The URL can be used to link to this page

97-399� . .� . . �.t ` CITY 6F ST. PAUi. ga� ��. � �,3�� CCiiSNGIL FSLE NCa. - - IR ;' r � !C4_z��..: ,�"�f� �,� Y'lt2 1�JG. l 3_i�Cil� �4�1FS.'�. T !';�it'? '� Izx ttas Matter af Reconstruc4i�n of sidevraik at the f�liowina ln^�ti�ns; v3 �a�� -��n si �ev Hu.htar z 2'i�s. frcnl Fr1r ;t. t:, Alt3ir�e St. =a�a td?st sirte �'ry St, frr��e Hui+bgrd Av?. tc+ �nglewood Ave. '� . 'j'TpRATR' rQ�rSTj�U T7 j3T AT F�' rD .°dTTF�� nm .� {�z'ie, t:aa or *::re2 fsmi2;� stY'uctures; } itscoxistxuction ,reF.iacement af oId sidewalkl -$7.45 per front foat far a five t5:} � faer_ °rri+�e ws1A and .°,8. �� er f*ont foct for a st�? { 6} fc�e*_ wide walk. A11 c+ther widihs wi21 'be proreted accor�ingSy. Nex eonstruatioa ;wherE no walk esisted} - lt?0£ af the artua2 oost estamat�d ta �ae approximately $3.33 per square foot. P11 corner residentir�l pxoterties wi21 receive a aredit up to tT�e first 15C� feet of new or recorzstruated sidewalk alozg and abuttinq tlie "2oxzg side° - vf the �raparty. , Mt3TTT-RR. T .P7TTAF. {�SQiE C�tBTi 'C�iY'�U fB.E!1�.]+ 5'GTttf;tll2'�8; l NC1N RESIS7EII`1'It'tTU- R71TE° For new and reconstructed sidevralk; 100g of aotual aost estimate� ta be s��+ro:i�:ately $4.5Q �er �quara f3ot. under Freii.-�tinaiy ord�r 1 `'- 1�� approver3 y� . l c�. . t� � q� The Gounail vP tY�e City of Saint Faul Y.as c�n3uc*_ed a pu�lia heari�7c� v�,on tt�e above impravement, due nctice thereof Yiavinq bean giver �4 prsst.ribec� 3�y the City �,har£er; and WYEREA.°, The C�uncil has heard ail �eruons, objeaticns end rec�mxc:enctatiorss pertaininq 4� saicl prcgc�sed isnprovemsnt and "nas fully considEre� 4'r.e ssme; na�a, therefere, b� it rcES'�I,'TEll, T:at the Cvusicil of tne City �+f �eint Fsu2 ;3c�� h�i�by erc�er tisat t2:� abave-desari33ed imgrovement he made, anci the prop�r City ofPiaers are herel�y 3irectecl an� aut� t� pr�a<et3 v;ith th� im�; anu be it r^URTHER ItE;;c3LVE�, 2'hat uyon the c�mpietion o€ said impro�amanE, the proper Gity affiaErs shail calculate a12 expenses incurres3 t??ereir a�ct sha�2 repart t�?e ��me to the City Ccsuncil in sccordance *�zith Chagver 14 af the City Charter. C()JY3C 2LPEkS�23S Y2as /� Pdays V �I�keLLr � y/ �a ris �J�ae�' �.or�'CSV� �gard Retiman — - A�j.setii- �/'��ane Adopted Yy C;ounail: UatE��q4", - ' - ��=� - �r Cerf.ifisd rassed by C:ounci2 �ecretary t� In r �vc�r Q r�yainst � �}bsen�'" fiY �-- . ��.-��i� �.-� � :; �GZ� r��t,. n.A� 9�-�99 Public Hearin Date — A ril 9, 1997 RE 1-31-97 � O �� DEPARTMENT/OFFICFKOUNCIL DATEINRIATED GREEN SHEET NO. a__._2 Public Works Sidewalks 1-9-9� INITIAUDATE IryRIAL/DATE CAMACT PERSON 8 PHONE � pEpA(yTMENT DIRECT�R � C{7Y CpUNC1l Robert A Lissick - 266-6086 ^��N cmarTOanEV �CliYCLEflK MUSS H£ ON GOUNCIL AGEHDA BY (DA'fE) NUMBB7 FOR 2-19-97 ��' &JDGETDIAECTOA �FIN.BMGT.SEFNICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office �p MAYOfl(OflA5515TANn 1�Coundl Research b noon on Frida 2-7-97 � TOTAL ft OF S�GNATURE PAGES 1 __ (GLIP ALL LOCA710N5 FOfi SIGNA7UR� ��C�1iE � �EPAqTMENYAIACCOUMANT ACTION PE�UESTED Reco�stcuct Sidewalk in Ward:_ tf (See attached list) Finance File No. 5970/3 RECOMMENDATIONS=Apprwe (!a or Rejea (Po PERSONAL SERVICE CONTNACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: _ PLANNING CAMMISSION _ CNIL SERYICE COMMISStON I- � m� �jES � NO � Worked untler a contrac[ for this depaNnent? _CIB CoMMI77EE 2. Nas this Perso�rm ever been a city employee? — YES NO p STAFp , 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normalty possessed by arry current city DISTqICTCOUNCIL — � � employee? YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTNE? �P��^ all yes anawers on separata sheet and attaeh to green sheet � Neighborhoods Ward �f INITIATING PR09LEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITY (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE. WNY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, eta These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corracted on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPPOVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for fls many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contracfors, so it folfows that privaie sector jobs are created as a resuk of tfiis activity. DISADVANTMaES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area ofi construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. r,�,_� , .. --°'.- .��y� �d�d�� : bi'�� OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more per�onal injury suits, uflimately resulting in the expenditure of Iarger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTRANSACTIONS CbST/HEVENl1EBUDGETED(CIPCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSWHCE A, PlA 97 ACITVRYNUMBER FINANCIAIINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B, AST C. CIB 97 SUMMARY OF EI3GINE R3I3G RECOMMEATDATIOI3S �� -��I�l Ward 4 ; e17 p�3 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. HUBBAFtD AVE. from Fry St. to Aldine St. & W.S. FRY ST. from Hubbard Ave. to Englewood Ave. INITIATING ACTION: T'his order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of seren (7) complainis and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... GI9Y � �� F S i p � 2 .� a �I¢Q�� ElIlI a III[ � [1 fI a M1 C � +as� � Saint Paul City Council Fublic Hearing Notice Public Improvement Construction OWNER OR TAXPAYER � ��l -��l`j COUNCIL DISTRICT #4 PLANNING COUNCIL #11 FILE # S4��i3;':��:;=:� :.':; PROPERTY ADDRESS ,..;�:..,: s:€>;�: �€::;'>�';;;;>�>a�z;.:;:';;:`.:� ::::::.:::::.:�:; -; _::::::;::>;;_:;.:::_:.:_�;:: :�.'..G1":l PARCEL ID PROPBRTY TAX DESCRIPTION �:. � , : ;�°; ��;b� .mn-> � h :.;�s THE TIME: WEDNESDAY. APRIL 9, 1997 AT 4:30 P.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall-Court House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner will be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approval of the proposed project as foilows: RECONSTRUC710N OF SIDEWALK ON BOTH SIDES HUBBARD AVENUE FROM FRY STREET TO ALDINE STt2EET AND WEST SIDE FRY STREET FROM HUBBARD AVENUE TO ENGLEWOOD AVENUE. If the City Council approves the project, ali or part of the cost wili be assessed against the benefitted properties. The ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is NOTE: THIS IS NOT A BiLL! Piease see PAYMENT INFORMATiON on the reverse side of this notice. � CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE: 03/21/97 q ��aq CITY OF SR. PRUL 0 R I G 1 N A L G�CZL F`ILE 23U. �'1 �� PRELII�tARY ORDER By '„ .t✓ File No. �97013 Vatir.g War� 4 In the i�ttsr of Re�csnstruction cf sidewsik at the follawing locations: 897413 - Eath sid�s Hubbard AvE. from Fry St, tc, Aldine St. and West side Fry St. from Hubberd Ave. to Enalewood Ave. ■MS A Jl RFS7a NTrAi am �{pne, two or three family structurea) Reoot�atruat3on {replacement U£ �ld sidewalk} -$7,45 per fror:t fact fe•r a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.99 per front foot for a six {6} foot wide walk. All �ther wi�3ttis will be prorated accardingly. Nsw construction {v.here no walk existed} - 1U0� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.s3 per square foot. F11 corner residential propertiea wiil receive a credit ug tG trie first 1��J feet of new or reconetructed sic�ewa2k a2ong and abutting the "lonq side" c+f the prapErty. �3t•ms-uF�;fn pTTAT {More than three family atructures), NUN- F�T �,N T T, A ,�", For new ar,d reconstructed sidew�lk; 100�s of actuel cast estimated to be appr�ximately $9.50 per square foc,t. The Counci2 of the City af Seir�t Faul havir�g received the report of the Msyor upon thE ak,ove im�rovement, ar.d having oansidered ssid report, hereby resolves; 1. fihat trie said report and the same is hereby c�,provec� witl no alternatiees, and that the estimated cost thereoY is *SEE ABOVE for esti.mated construction rates, financed by asseasments and 1997 Public Impzot�ement Isid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 9th day c.f Ar=r;t t�97 at 4:30 r��nt.,�s n k,� in the C�uncil Chambers of the City Hsll and Covrt House Buildinq in the City of Saint Paul. 3. Th�t notice of said public hesring be given to the persons frnd in the manner provided by the Ctiarter, stnting the titne and ylace of hearinq, the nature of the impravement end the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCZLPEfi8Q13S Yeas � Naya ✓Bl +/�ostrom �rris � er L�8rc1 �tman hune � In Favoz �Against Adepted by Conncil: Date �� qr� Certified Passed by council Secretary &Y � � �ir��,-c�-� _� � Mayor � . .� . . �.t ` CITY 6F ST. PAUi. ga� ��. � �,3�� CCiiSNGIL FSLE NCa. - - IR ;' r � !C4_z��..: ,�"�f� �,� Y'lt2 1�JG. l 3_i�Cil� �4�1FS.'�. T !';�it'? '� Izx ttas Matter af Reconstruc4i�n of sidevraik at the f�liowina ln^�ti�ns; v3 �a�� -��n si �ev Hu.htar z 2'i�s. frcnl Fr1r ;t. t:, Alt3ir�e St. =a�a td?st sirte �'ry St, frr��e Hui+bgrd Av?. tc+ �nglewood Ave. '� . 'j'TpRATR' rQ�rSTj�U T7 j3T AT F�' rD .°dTTF�� nm .� {�z'ie, t:aa or *::re2 fsmi2;� stY'uctures; } itscoxistxuction ,reF.iacement af oId sidewalkl -$7.45 per front foat far a five t5:} � faer_ °rri+�e ws1A and .°,8. �� er f*ont foct for a st�? { 6} fc�e*_ wide walk. A11 c+ther widihs wi21 'be proreted accor�ingSy. Nex eonstruatioa ;wherE no walk esisted} - lt?0£ af the artua2 oost estamat�d ta �ae approximately $3.33 per square foot. P11 corner residentir�l pxoterties wi21 receive a aredit up to tT�e first 15C� feet of new or recorzstruated sidewalk alozg and abuttinq tlie "2oxzg side° - vf the �raparty. , Mt3TTT-RR. T .P7TTAF. {�SQiE C�tBTi 'C�iY'�U fB.E!1�.]+ 5'GTttf;tll2'�8; l NC1N RESIS7EII`1'It'tTU- R71TE° For new and reconstructed sidevralk; 100g of aotual aost estimate� ta be s��+ro:i�:ately $4.5Q �er �quara f3ot. under Freii.-�tinaiy ord�r 1 `'- 1�� approver3 y� . l c�. . t� � q� The Gounail vP tY�e City of Saint Faul Y.as c�n3uc*_ed a pu�lia heari�7c� v�,on tt�e above impravement, due nctice thereof Yiavinq bean giver �4 prsst.ribec� 3�y the City �,har£er; and WYEREA.°, The C�uncil has heard ail �eruons, objeaticns end rec�mxc:enctatiorss pertaininq 4� saicl prcgc�sed isnprovemsnt and "nas fully considEre� 4'r.e ssme; na�a, therefere, b� it rcES'�I,'TEll, T:at the Cvusicil of tne City �+f �eint Fsu2 ;3c�� h�i�by erc�er tisat t2:� abave-desari33ed imgrovement he made, anci the prop�r City ofPiaers are herel�y 3irectecl an� aut� t� pr�a<et3 v;ith th� im�; anu be it r^URTHER ItE;;c3LVE�, 2'hat uyon the c�mpietion o€ said impro�amanE, the proper Gity affiaErs shail calculate a12 expenses incurres3 t??ereir a�ct sha�2 repart t�?e ��me to the City Ccsuncil in sccordance *�zith Chagver 14 af the City Charter. C()JY3C 2LPEkS�23S Y2as /� Pdays V �I�keLLr � y/ �a ris �J�ae�' �.or�'CSV� �gard Retiman — - A�j.setii- �/'��ane Adopted Yy C;ounail: UatE��q4", - ' - ��=� - �r Cerf.ifisd rassed by C:ounci2 �ecretary t� In r �vc�r Q r�yainst � �}bsen�'" fiY �-- . ��.-��i� �.-� � :; �GZ� r��t,. n.A� 9�-�99 Public Hearin Date — A ril 9, 1997 RE 1-31-97 � O �� DEPARTMENT/OFFICFKOUNCIL DATEINRIATED GREEN SHEET NO. a__._2 Public Works Sidewalks 1-9-9� INITIAUDATE IryRIAL/DATE CAMACT PERSON 8 PHONE � pEpA(yTMENT DIRECT�R � C{7Y CpUNC1l Robert A Lissick - 266-6086 ^��N cmarTOanEV �CliYCLEflK MUSS H£ ON GOUNCIL AGEHDA BY (DA'fE) NUMBB7 FOR 2-19-97 ��' &JDGETDIAECTOA �FIN.BMGT.SEFNICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office �p MAYOfl(OflA5515TANn 1�Coundl Research b noon on Frida 2-7-97 � TOTAL ft OF S�GNATURE PAGES 1 __ (GLIP ALL LOCA710N5 FOfi SIGNA7UR� ��C�1iE � �EPAqTMENYAIACCOUMANT ACTION PE�UESTED Reco�stcuct Sidewalk in Ward:_ tf (See attached list) Finance File No. 5970/3 RECOMMENDATIONS=Apprwe (!a or Rejea (Po PERSONAL SERVICE CONTNACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: _ PLANNING CAMMISSION _ CNIL SERYICE COMMISStON I- � m� �jES � NO � Worked untler a contrac[ for this depaNnent? _CIB CoMMI77EE 2. Nas this Perso�rm ever been a city employee? — YES NO p STAFp , 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normalty possessed by arry current city DISTqICTCOUNCIL — � � employee? YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTNE? �P��^ all yes anawers on separata sheet and attaeh to green sheet � Neighborhoods Ward �f INITIATING PR09LEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITY (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE. WNY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, eta These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corracted on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPPOVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for fls many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contracfors, so it folfows that privaie sector jobs are created as a resuk of tfiis activity. DISADVANTMaES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area ofi construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. r,�,_� , .. --°'.- .��y� �d�d�� : bi'�� OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more per�onal injury suits, uflimately resulting in the expenditure of Iarger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTRANSACTIONS CbST/HEVENl1EBUDGETED(CIPCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSWHCE A, PlA 97 ACITVRYNUMBER FINANCIAIINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B, AST C. CIB 97 SUMMARY OF EI3GINE R3I3G RECOMMEATDATIOI3S �� -��I�l Ward 4 ; e17 p�3 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. HUBBAFtD AVE. from Fry St. to Aldine St. & W.S. FRY ST. from Hubbard Ave. to Englewood Ave. INITIATING ACTION: T'his order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of seren (7) complainis and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... GI9Y � �� F S i p � 2 .� a �I¢Q�� ElIlI a III[ � [1 fI a M1 C � +as� � Saint Paul City Council Fublic Hearing Notice Public Improvement Construction OWNER OR TAXPAYER � ��l -��l`j COUNCIL DISTRICT #4 PLANNING COUNCIL #11 FILE # S4��i3;':��:;=:� :.':; PROPERTY ADDRESS ,..;�:..,: s:€>;�: �€::;'>�';;;;>�>a�z;.:;:';;:`.:� ::::::.:::::.:�:; -; _::::::;::>;;_:;.:::_:.:_�;:: :�.'..G1":l PARCEL ID PROPBRTY TAX DESCRIPTION �:. � , : ;�°; ��;b� .mn-> � h :.;�s THE TIME: WEDNESDAY. APRIL 9, 1997 AT 4:30 P.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall-Court House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner will be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approval of the proposed project as foilows: RECONSTRUC710N OF SIDEWALK ON BOTH SIDES HUBBARD AVENUE FROM FRY STREET TO ALDINE STt2EET AND WEST SIDE FRY STREET FROM HUBBARD AVENUE TO ENGLEWOOD AVENUE. If the City Council approves the project, ali or part of the cost wili be assessed against the benefitted properties. The ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is NOTE: THIS IS NOT A BiLL! Piease see PAYMENT INFORMATiON on the reverse side of this notice. � CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE: 03/21/97 q ��aq CITY OF SR. PRUL 0 R I G 1 N A L G�CZL F`ILE 23U. �'1 �� PRELII�tARY ORDER By '„ .t✓ File No. �97013 Vatir.g War� 4 In the i�ttsr of Re�csnstruction cf sidewsik at the follawing locations: 897413 - Eath sid�s Hubbard AvE. from Fry St, tc, Aldine St. and West side Fry St. from Hubberd Ave. to Enalewood Ave. ■MS A Jl RFS7a NTrAi am �{pne, two or three family structurea) Reoot�atruat3on {replacement U£ �ld sidewalk} -$7,45 per fror:t fact fe•r a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.99 per front foot for a six {6} foot wide walk. All �ther wi�3ttis will be prorated accardingly. Nsw construction {v.here no walk existed} - 1U0� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.s3 per square foot. F11 corner residential propertiea wiil receive a credit ug tG trie first 1��J feet of new or reconetructed sic�ewa2k a2ong and abutting the "lonq side" c+f the prapErty. �3t•ms-uF�;fn pTTAT {More than three family atructures), NUN- F�T �,N T T, A ,�", For new ar,d reconstructed sidew�lk; 100�s of actuel cast estimated to be appr�ximately $9.50 per square foc,t. The Counci2 of the City af Seir�t Faul havir�g received the report of the Msyor upon thE ak,ove im�rovement, ar.d having oansidered ssid report, hereby resolves; 1. fihat trie said report and the same is hereby c�,provec� witl no alternatiees, and that the estimated cost thereoY is *SEE ABOVE for esti.mated construction rates, financed by asseasments and 1997 Public Impzot�ement Isid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 9th day c.f Ar=r;t t�97 at 4:30 r��nt.,�s n k,� in the C�uncil Chambers of the City Hsll and Covrt House Buildinq in the City of Saint Paul. 3. Th�t notice of said public hesring be given to the persons frnd in the manner provided by the Ctiarter, stnting the titne and ylace of hearinq, the nature of the impravement end the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCZLPEfi8Q13S Yeas � Naya ✓Bl +/�ostrom �rris � er L�8rc1 �tman hune � In Favoz �Against Adepted by Conncil: Date �� qr� Certified Passed by council Secretary &Y � � �ir��,-c�-� _� � Mayor � . .� . . �.t ` CITY 6F ST. PAUi. ga� ��. � �,3�� CCiiSNGIL FSLE NCa. - - IR ;' r � !C4_z��..: ,�"�f� �,� Y'lt2 1�JG. l 3_i�Cil� �4�1FS.'�. T !';�it'? '� Izx ttas Matter af Reconstruc4i�n of sidevraik at the f�liowina ln^�ti�ns; v3 �a�� -��n si �ev Hu.htar z 2'i�s. frcnl Fr1r ;t. t:, Alt3ir�e St. =a�a td?st sirte �'ry St, frr��e Hui+bgrd Av?. tc+ �nglewood Ave. '� . 'j'TpRATR' rQ�rSTj�U T7 j3T AT F�' rD .°dTTF�� nm .� {�z'ie, t:aa or *::re2 fsmi2;� stY'uctures; } itscoxistxuction ,reF.iacement af oId sidewalkl -$7.45 per front foat far a five t5:} � faer_ °rri+�e ws1A and .°,8. �� er f*ont foct for a st�? { 6} fc�e*_ wide walk. A11 c+ther widihs wi21 'be proreted accor�ingSy. Nex eonstruatioa ;wherE no walk esisted} - lt?0£ af the artua2 oost estamat�d ta �ae approximately $3.33 per square foot. P11 corner residentir�l pxoterties wi21 receive a aredit up to tT�e first 15C� feet of new or recorzstruated sidewalk alozg and abuttinq tlie "2oxzg side° - vf the �raparty. , Mt3TTT-RR. T .P7TTAF. {�SQiE C�tBTi 'C�iY'�U fB.E!1�.]+ 5'GTttf;tll2'�8; l NC1N RESIS7EII`1'It'tTU- R71TE° For new and reconstructed sidevralk; 100g of aotual aost estimate� ta be s��+ro:i�:ately $4.5Q �er �quara f3ot. under Freii.-�tinaiy ord�r 1 `'- 1�� approver3 y� . l c�. . t� � q� The Gounail vP tY�e City of Saint Faul Y.as c�n3uc*_ed a pu�lia heari�7c� v�,on tt�e above impravement, due nctice thereof Yiavinq bean giver �4 prsst.ribec� 3�y the City �,har£er; and WYEREA.°, The C�uncil has heard ail �eruons, objeaticns end rec�mxc:enctatiorss pertaininq 4� saicl prcgc�sed isnprovemsnt and "nas fully considEre� 4'r.e ssme; na�a, therefere, b� it rcES'�I,'TEll, T:at the Cvusicil of tne City �+f �eint Fsu2 ;3c�� h�i�by erc�er tisat t2:� abave-desari33ed imgrovement he made, anci the prop�r City ofPiaers are herel�y 3irectecl an� aut� t� pr�a<et3 v;ith th� im�; anu be it r^URTHER ItE;;c3LVE�, 2'hat uyon the c�mpietion o€ said impro�amanE, the proper Gity affiaErs shail calculate a12 expenses incurres3 t??ereir a�ct sha�2 repart t�?e ��me to the City Ccsuncil in sccordance *�zith Chagver 14 af the City Charter. C()JY3C 2LPEkS�23S Y2as /� Pdays V �I�keLLr � y/ �a ris �J�ae�' �.or�'CSV� �gard Retiman — - A�j.setii- �/'��ane Adopted Yy C;ounail: UatE��q4", - ' - ��=� - �r Cerf.ifisd rassed by C:ounci2 �ecretary t� In r �vc�r Q r�yainst � �}bsen�'" fiY �-- . ��.-��i� �.-� � :; �GZ� r��t,. n.A� 9�-�99 Public Hearin Date — A ril 9, 1997 RE 1-31-97 � O �� DEPARTMENT/OFFICFKOUNCIL DATEINRIATED GREEN SHEET NO. a__._2 Public Works Sidewalks 1-9-9� INITIAUDATE IryRIAL/DATE CAMACT PERSON 8 PHONE � pEpA(yTMENT DIRECT�R � C{7Y CpUNC1l Robert A Lissick - 266-6086 ^��N cmarTOanEV �CliYCLEflK MUSS H£ ON GOUNCIL AGEHDA BY (DA'fE) NUMBB7 FOR 2-19-97 ��' &JDGETDIAECTOA �FIN.BMGT.SEFNICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office �p MAYOfl(OflA5515TANn 1�Coundl Research b noon on Frida 2-7-97 � TOTAL ft OF S�GNATURE PAGES 1 __ (GLIP ALL LOCA710N5 FOfi SIGNA7UR� ��C�1iE � �EPAqTMENYAIACCOUMANT ACTION PE�UESTED Reco�stcuct Sidewalk in Ward:_ tf (See attached list) Finance File No. 5970/3 RECOMMENDATIONS=Apprwe (!a or Rejea (Po PERSONAL SERVICE CONTNACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: _ PLANNING CAMMISSION _ CNIL SERYICE COMMISStON I- � m� �jES � NO � Worked untler a contrac[ for this depaNnent? _CIB CoMMI77EE 2. Nas this Perso�rm ever been a city employee? — YES NO p STAFp , 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normalty possessed by arry current city DISTqICTCOUNCIL — � � employee? YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTNE? �P��^ all yes anawers on separata sheet and attaeh to green sheet � Neighborhoods Ward �f INITIATING PR09LEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITY (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE. WNY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, eta These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corracted on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPPOVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for fls many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contracfors, so it folfows that privaie sector jobs are created as a resuk of tfiis activity. DISADVANTMaES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area ofi construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. r,�,_� , .. --°'.- .��y� �d�d�� : bi'�� OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more per�onal injury suits, uflimately resulting in the expenditure of Iarger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTRANSACTIONS CbST/HEVENl1EBUDGETED(CIPCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSWHCE A, PlA 97 ACITVRYNUMBER FINANCIAIINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B, AST C. CIB 97 SUMMARY OF EI3GINE R3I3G RECOMMEATDATIOI3S �� -��I�l Ward 4 ; e17 p�3 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. HUBBAFtD AVE. from Fry St. to Aldine St. & W.S. FRY ST. from Hubbard Ave. to Englewood Ave. INITIATING ACTION: T'his order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of seren (7) complainis and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and settled panels. ................................................................... GI9Y � �� F S i p � 2 .� a �I¢Q�� ElIlI a III[ � [1 fI a M1 C � +as� � Saint Paul City Council Fublic Hearing Notice Public Improvement Construction OWNER OR TAXPAYER � ��l -��l`j COUNCIL DISTRICT #4 PLANNING COUNCIL #11 FILE # S4��i3;':��:;=:� :.':; PROPERTY ADDRESS ,..;�:..,: s:€>;�: �€::;'>�';;;;>�>a�z;.:;:';;:`.:� ::::::.:::::.:�:; -; _::::::;::>;;_:;.:::_:.:_�;:: :�.'..G1":l PARCEL ID PROPBRTY TAX DESCRIPTION �:. � , : ;�°; ��;b� .mn-> � h :.;�s THE TIME: WEDNESDAY. APRIL 9, 1997 AT 4:30 P.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall-Court House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner will be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approval of the proposed project as foilows: RECONSTRUC710N OF SIDEWALK ON BOTH SIDES HUBBARD AVENUE FROM FRY STREET TO ALDINE STt2EET AND WEST SIDE FRY STREET FROM HUBBARD AVENUE TO ENGLEWOOD AVENUE. If the City Council approves the project, ali or part of the cost wili be assessed against the benefitted properties. The ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is NOTE: THIS IS NOT A BiLL! Piease see PAYMENT INFORMATiON on the reverse side of this notice. � CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE: 03/21/97 q ��aq CITY OF SR. PRUL 0 R I G 1 N A L G�CZL F`ILE 23U. �'1 �� PRELII�tARY ORDER By '„ .t✓ File No. �97013 Vatir.g War� 4 In the i�ttsr of Re�csnstruction cf sidewsik at the follawing locations: 897413 - Eath sid�s Hubbard AvE. from Fry St, tc, Aldine St. and West side Fry St. from Hubberd Ave. to Enalewood Ave. ■MS A Jl RFS7a NTrAi am �{pne, two or three family structurea) Reoot�atruat3on {replacement U£ �ld sidewalk} -$7,45 per fror:t fact fe•r a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.99 per front foot for a six {6} foot wide walk. All �ther wi�3ttis will be prorated accardingly. Nsw construction {v.here no walk existed} - 1U0� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.s3 per square foot. F11 corner residential propertiea wiil receive a credit ug tG trie first 1��J feet of new or reconetructed sic�ewa2k a2ong and abutting the "lonq side" c+f the prapErty. �3t•ms-uF�;fn pTTAT {More than three family atructures), NUN- F�T �,N T T, A ,�", For new ar,d reconstructed sidew�lk; 100�s of actuel cast estimated to be appr�ximately $9.50 per square foc,t. The Counci2 of the City af Seir�t Faul havir�g received the report of the Msyor upon thE ak,ove im�rovement, ar.d having oansidered ssid report, hereby resolves; 1. fihat trie said report and the same is hereby c�,provec� witl no alternatiees, and that the estimated cost thereoY is *SEE ABOVE for esti.mated construction rates, financed by asseasments and 1997 Public Impzot�ement Isid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 9th day c.f Ar=r;t t�97 at 4:30 r��nt.,�s n k,� in the C�uncil Chambers of the City Hsll and Covrt House Buildinq in the City of Saint Paul. 3. Th�t notice of said public hesring be given to the persons frnd in the manner provided by the Ctiarter, stnting the titne and ylace of hearinq, the nature of the impravement end the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCZLPEfi8Q13S Yeas � Naya ✓Bl +/�ostrom �rris � er L�8rc1 �tman hune � In Favoz �Against Adepted by Conncil: Date �� qr� Certified Passed by council Secretary &Y � � �ir��,-c�-� _� � Mayor