The URL can be used to link to this page

97-320M . ,,. f 4�' r, ,, cxxx o� sx, pntr�. �� Caunci2 has heard a21 peraons, abjections and reaommendatioxis praposed impzovemeat and has fu1Zy aonsiciared tk:e szn;e; now, __ AIU.�_�ii6..:-`l iII� �B�L*� _ u.�� Tu the Matter g£ Cgnv�ru�ti.an and;gi rac�nstnioti.on oT �idewalk �t thY fv2t:,wir_s� 3oce=iUr,s: �U6 Juna Ave; 213� Reyar� Ave; 2127 Highie Pa 2173 Scheffer A?e; �18� Ifnapp o�: �335 � 239� V�ien±ine Fve; 2�22 � 217fi§ E. E`curth �t .. �MT:. . _ . • . _ _ 4\ , . pv'SIU�. ..ATES {OYs2 *;vo 't,`Y t:YY`e° f3..^iilTy' s�PUCtL:�e$} Rscenstructiou (replscement of old sidewalkl -�S7.il yer front Pavt for a Yive (5} fect wid� w�lk_ and 83.54 per fic?izt fc�t fcr ��ix (6} foot c�rid� walk. A11 other widths iaill be proreted accordingly. New aarsstruatina iw}iere n�, cvalk e�istedj - 10�� - vz" �l actuai cost e�ti:nate� tc k,� apnroximately $3.23 per sc�uare Poet. g11 corner residentia2 pro�,erties wil2 receiu� � credit up te the first 15C? feet oi new or reconstructed sidewalk a2ong an� abutting the "long �ide" of t?ie pr6�erty. } {Mrt�� '�j�$Tl '��Yi'2? fami3y St�llC$liT'26} ��TCYN RT'�ETTiF,'�TAT j3ATF.0 Far new and reaonstruct�� i�ehtalk; 100'k of act�aal co�t estimated tc� be appro:€imataly $4.35 per sc;uar� fovt. unuer Prelimir�ary S� °I'l - 3 a e� � T2xe Cauneil af th� Cit}+ af us3rit Fau1 has candu�tec� a pubiic he�ring u�on the ab+�ve imgro��anent, due n�itic� +_h�reof havinq besn �iven as presoriaet� ;�y tha City C2,�rEer; and WHEREA� Th� pertaininq to said ±her?fore, h� it R'�SOZVED, That the Ccuncil c-f th� City oP Saint Faul �3oes herehy crder that the abuve-described improvemEnt be made, antl the proper :.ity Off1CBT5 ara liereby diracted srd a�±t2iotirEC *o �roceed with ths imprav2�nent, a:�� e it FU'RTr�,R FtEvi.LV�l'3, That upon ti�� ca�plati�r. �f s�id i��ra�amer_•�, tiza proF,er Lity o€fiaers ahal"i aelcu3ate �12 ex�ens�s incurrad Lherain and �hall re�art thE asme t� che C:ity Council in accordance saith Chapter 14 of the City Charter. �4Ui�GILFEk8t7T3S Yeas 23ays �Iakey ✓soetroin ✓�arris l � Mor+'oN ��e� 3rd �ettman ✓'�iax:e �ic�opted by Ga Bate o 1 �, ��{ q'� CertiFied Pa��ad by Gvunci3 �ee-retary �ZkY E'&YGZ $� . �. ��_ , ./ /�. / �Againsc C�e/Lj �� ! `�� ?H�y^r Public Hearing Date — 3-26=97 Public Works Sidewatks } RE 1-2-97 —17-97 GREEN SHEET CONTACT PEfl50ti & PHONE � pEppp7MEN7 DIAECTOA Robert A. Lissick - 2666066 �N C17Y A7TOANEV NUMBHi WN MUSTBE014COUNCILAGENDRBY(DAS")c 2-5-9� MUSt be � BUOGETDIRECTOF in Gouncil Research Office by noon OMAYOR(ORASSISTMIT) Pri:da 1-24-97 TOTAL i OF SIGNANRE PAGES j _(CLIP ALL LOCA7IONS FOR SIGNANB� ASSOCViTE AGTION REIXlESTED +� �N,;''� Reconstnrcf Sidewalk in Ward 2tSee attached list) F►tE .Vp. 596051 _CNIL SERVICE CO1dMISS10N CIB COMMRTEE STAFF ' t�9� �Z� ;.1L OBJECTNE4 CLERK 8 MGT. SEFiVICES DEPARTMEFf�AL ACCOUMANi PEHSONAL SEHVICE CONTHACTS IAU3T ANSWEH THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: 1. Has ihis p�rs�n!F(m ever wo�ked under a contract for Wis departrnent? EY S NO 2. Nas this persoMim� ever been a ciry empioyee? YES NQ 3. Does ihis pereon/firm possess a skill not normally pwsessed by any curtent dry employee? YES NO Fsplain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green shaet ITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORiUNIT' (WHO. WHAT, WHEN, wHENt, wHr7: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akernating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These prob�ems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The cnmmunity will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk cnntracts are executed by private contractors, so it foflows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activiry. DiSADVANTAGES iF APPAOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still �af *�, remains controversial. yaaw�i4 �""""��" � �', '"� �a�h G9n$��' �'"� . :, �4;�� 2 � ��7 d r..e `?. .. .��. tADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROYE�: . - - - - - - This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in fu n will generaie more personal injury suits, ukimately resufting in the expenditure ofi iarger dollar amounts in eventual repaiTS andlor repfacemeM, as weli as cfaim payouts. � � - 3a o N O. �G'��''"'�— MITIAUDATE � fOTALAMOUMOF7RAN5ACT10NE 465.56 CAST/REVENUEBUDGETEO(CIRCLEONE) � NO FuNOwcsouace 96�hi-0665 A, eiA 96 = 53S:o0D ACRVITYNUMBEFi C96 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� A�T = 43Z,o0D C. Ct6 96 = 50,000 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION ��-� a a Ward 7 = r PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. FOURTH ST. from Pedersen St. to N. Winthrop St. at 2082 & 2084 E. Fourth St. Only. T ' �. i0�` IIHIT�ATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CQIQDITIOI�TS: This walk is poured concrete with off�ade and scaled panels. ................................................................... SUMMARY OF ENGII3EERING RECOMMENDATIOIV ��,�� t� Ward 2 � `' PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. JUNO AVE, from S. Victoria St. to S. Milton St. at 906 Juno Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade and asphalt patches. .................................................................. �t O SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS � I"�� Ward 3 , ! PROJECT: RECOI�ISTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BAYARD AVE, from S. Finn St. to S. Cretin Ave, at 2135 Bayard Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: T'his order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked paneis. PROJECT: RECONSTRi3CT SIDEWALK N.S. HIGHLAND PKVJY. from S. Cretin Ave. to Mt. Curve Blvd. at � j7 Highland Pkwy. Only. IPiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with offgrade ar�d scaled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. SCHEFFER AVE. from S. Finn St. to S. Cretin Ave. at 2173 Scheffer Ave. Only. IPTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. SUMMARY OF E]VGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS ��-- 3 a-d Ward 4 � z PROJECT; CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. KNAPP ST. from Como Ave. to Knapp Pl. 2i 8' b XivA/� st. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from St. Anthony Park School. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is first time construction. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. VALENTINE AVE. from Como Ave. to Keston St. at 2315 Valentine Ave. Only. IDTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with offgrade panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. VALENTINE AVE. from Brompton St. to Eustis Ave. at 2394 Valentine Ave. Only. ITiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with tree heaves. ................................................................... ��f�i �I��l'i! CITY OF ST. PAUL PXELIMINARY ORD$R �In Favor q'1- � a ,� �" � l . t�� 2.3,9,7 Tn the Matter of Construction endlor reconetructien of sidewelk et the fallowing looation9: 906 Juno Ave; 2135 Bayard Ave; 2117 Highland Parkway; 2173 Scheffer Ave; 2180 Knapp �t; 2315 5 2399 Velentine Ave; 20&2 � 2Q84 E. Fourth St Fi � : � � , . RFSTPENTt T, nm q(p two or three family �tructures) Reaonstruation (rEplecement of old sidewalk} - 87.21 per frvnt foot for e five �5) foet wide walk and $8.64 per fr�nt foot for a six (6) fe�t wlde walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. 13ew constxvction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.23 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will reosive a aredit up to the firat 150 feet of new or recanstructed sidews2k along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MITLTT- F�g D NTT T(More than three €amily structurea), 130N-REg7I}.NT7A7 AT S F�r new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actusl cost estimeted to be spproximstely $4.35 per n9uare foot. The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 havinq teceived the repart of the Mayor upon the above improvement, eiid having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no altErnatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE AAOVE foi estimated conatruction rates, financed by asseasmezzts and 1996 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearinq bs had on said improvement on 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chamhers Caurt Hau�e Buildinq in the City of 8aint Paul. � �;h the 7�}r day of Marcti, of the City Hsll and 3. Thet notice af said public hEaxinq re qiven to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimatad. COUNCILPER3QN5 Yeas Naya ��,akey ✓o trom �ris �E2 ��I ard �/R�tman ✓hune � AqRinst �� e No. ing F Rdepted by Covncil: Date . �__�yq � Certified Fassed by Counci ecretary BY ��, c� �/V�_�r� *--�. Mayor M . ,,. f 4�' r, ,, cxxx o� sx, pntr�. �� Caunci2 has heard a21 peraons, abjections and reaommendatioxis praposed impzovemeat and has fu1Zy aonsiciared tk:e szn;e; now, __ AIU.�_�ii6..:-`l iII� �B�L*� _ u.�� Tu the Matter g£ Cgnv�ru�ti.an and;gi rac�nstnioti.on oT �idewalk �t thY fv2t:,wir_s� 3oce=iUr,s: �U6 Juna Ave; 213� Reyar� Ave; 2127 Highie Pa 2173 Scheffer A?e; �18� Ifnapp o�: �335 � 239� V�ien±ine Fve; 2�22 � 217fi§ E. E`curth �t .. �MT:. . _ . • . _ _ 4\ , . pv'SIU�. ..ATES {OYs2 *;vo 't,`Y t:YY`e° f3..^iilTy' s�PUCtL:�e$} Rscenstructiou (replscement of old sidewalkl -�S7.il yer front Pavt for a Yive (5} fect wid� w�lk_ and 83.54 per fic?izt fc�t fcr ��ix (6} foot c�rid� walk. A11 other widths iaill be proreted accordingly. New aarsstruatina iw}iere n�, cvalk e�istedj - 10�� - vz" �l actuai cost e�ti:nate� tc k,� apnroximately $3.23 per sc�uare Poet. g11 corner residentia2 pro�,erties wil2 receiu� � credit up te the first 15C? feet oi new or reconstructed sidewalk a2ong an� abutting the "long �ide" of t?ie pr6�erty. } {Mrt�� '�j�$Tl '��Yi'2? fami3y St�llC$liT'26} ��TCYN RT'�ETTiF,'�TAT j3ATF.0 Far new and reaonstruct�� i�ehtalk; 100'k of act�aal co�t estimated tc� be appro:€imataly $4.35 per sc;uar� fovt. unuer Prelimir�ary S� °I'l - 3 a e� � T2xe Cauneil af th� Cit}+ af us3rit Fau1 has candu�tec� a pubiic he�ring u�on the ab+�ve imgro��anent, due n�itic� +_h�reof havinq besn �iven as presoriaet� ;�y tha City C2,�rEer; and WHEREA� Th� pertaininq to said ±her?fore, h� it R'�SOZVED, That the Ccuncil c-f th� City oP Saint Faul �3oes herehy crder that the abuve-described improvemEnt be made, antl the proper :.ity Off1CBT5 ara liereby diracted srd a�±t2iotirEC *o �roceed with ths imprav2�nent, a:�� e it FU'RTr�,R FtEvi.LV�l'3, That upon ti�� ca�plati�r. �f s�id i��ra�amer_•�, tiza proF,er Lity o€fiaers ahal"i aelcu3ate �12 ex�ens�s incurrad Lherain and �hall re�art thE asme t� che C:ity Council in accordance saith Chapter 14 of the City Charter. �4Ui�GILFEk8t7T3S Yeas 23ays �Iakey ✓soetroin ✓�arris l � Mor+'oN ��e� 3rd �ettman ✓'�iax:e �ic�opted by Ga Bate o 1 �, ��{ q'� CertiFied Pa��ad by Gvunci3 �ee-retary �ZkY E'&YGZ $� . �. ��_ , ./ /�. / �Againsc C�e/Lj �� ! `�� ?H�y^r Public Hearing Date — 3-26=97 Public Works Sidewatks } RE 1-2-97 —17-97 GREEN SHEET CONTACT PEfl50ti & PHONE � pEppp7MEN7 DIAECTOA Robert A. Lissick - 2666066 �N C17Y A7TOANEV NUMBHi WN MUSTBE014COUNCILAGENDRBY(DAS")c 2-5-9� MUSt be � BUOGETDIRECTOF in Gouncil Research Office by noon OMAYOR(ORASSISTMIT) Pri:da 1-24-97 TOTAL i OF SIGNANRE PAGES j _(CLIP ALL LOCA7IONS FOR SIGNANB� ASSOCViTE AGTION REIXlESTED +� �N,;''� Reconstnrcf Sidewalk in Ward 2tSee attached list) F►tE .Vp. 596051 _CNIL SERVICE CO1dMISS10N CIB COMMRTEE STAFF ' t�9� �Z� ;.1L OBJECTNE4 CLERK 8 MGT. SEFiVICES DEPARTMEFf�AL ACCOUMANi PEHSONAL SEHVICE CONTHACTS IAU3T ANSWEH THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: 1. Has ihis p�rs�n!F(m ever wo�ked under a contract for Wis departrnent? EY S NO 2. Nas this persoMim� ever been a ciry empioyee? YES NQ 3. Does ihis pereon/firm possess a skill not normally pwsessed by any curtent dry employee? YES NO Fsplain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green shaet ITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORiUNIT' (WHO. WHAT, WHEN, wHENt, wHr7: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akernating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These prob�ems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The cnmmunity will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk cnntracts are executed by private contractors, so it foflows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activiry. DiSADVANTAGES iF APPAOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still �af *�, remains controversial. yaaw�i4 �""""��" � �', '"� �a�h G9n$��' �'"� . :, �4;�� 2 � ��7 d r..e `?. .. .��. tADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROYE�: . - - - - - - This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in fu n will generaie more personal injury suits, ukimately resufting in the expenditure ofi iarger dollar amounts in eventual repaiTS andlor repfacemeM, as weli as cfaim payouts. � � - 3a o N O. �G'��''"'�— MITIAUDATE � fOTALAMOUMOF7RAN5ACT10NE 465.56 CAST/REVENUEBUDGETEO(CIRCLEONE) � NO FuNOwcsouace 96�hi-0665 A, eiA 96 = 53S:o0D ACRVITYNUMBEFi C96 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� A�T = 43Z,o0D C. Ct6 96 = 50,000 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION ��-� a a Ward 7 = r PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. FOURTH ST. from Pedersen St. to N. Winthrop St. at 2082 & 2084 E. Fourth St. Only. T ' �. i0�` IIHIT�ATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CQIQDITIOI�TS: This walk is poured concrete with off�ade and scaled panels. ................................................................... SUMMARY OF ENGII3EERING RECOMMENDATIOIV ��,�� t� Ward 2 � `' PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. JUNO AVE, from S. Victoria St. to S. Milton St. at 906 Juno Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade and asphalt patches. .................................................................. �t O SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS � I"�� Ward 3 , ! PROJECT: RECOI�ISTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BAYARD AVE, from S. Finn St. to S. Cretin Ave, at 2135 Bayard Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: T'his order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked paneis. PROJECT: RECONSTRi3CT SIDEWALK N.S. HIGHLAND PKVJY. from S. Cretin Ave. to Mt. Curve Blvd. at � j7 Highland Pkwy. Only. IPiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with offgrade ar�d scaled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. SCHEFFER AVE. from S. Finn St. to S. Cretin Ave. at 2173 Scheffer Ave. Only. IPTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. SUMMARY OF E]VGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS ��-- 3 a-d Ward 4 � z PROJECT; CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. KNAPP ST. from Como Ave. to Knapp Pl. 2i 8' b XivA/� st. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from St. Anthony Park School. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is first time construction. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. VALENTINE AVE. from Como Ave. to Keston St. at 2315 Valentine Ave. Only. IDTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with offgrade panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. VALENTINE AVE. from Brompton St. to Eustis Ave. at 2394 Valentine Ave. Only. ITiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with tree heaves. ................................................................... ��f�i �I��l'i! CITY OF ST. PAUL PXELIMINARY ORD$R �In Favor q'1- � a ,� �" � l . t�� 2.3,9,7 Tn the Matter of Construction endlor reconetructien of sidewelk et the fallowing looation9: 906 Juno Ave; 2135 Bayard Ave; 2117 Highland Parkway; 2173 Scheffer Ave; 2180 Knapp �t; 2315 5 2399 Velentine Ave; 20&2 � 2Q84 E. Fourth St Fi � : � � , . RFSTPENTt T, nm q(p two or three family �tructures) Reaonstruation (rEplecement of old sidewalk} - 87.21 per frvnt foot for e five �5) foet wide walk and $8.64 per fr�nt foot for a six (6) fe�t wlde walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. 13ew constxvction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.23 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will reosive a aredit up to the firat 150 feet of new or recanstructed sidews2k along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MITLTT- F�g D NTT T(More than three €amily structurea), 130N-REg7I}.NT7A7 AT S F�r new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actusl cost estimeted to be spproximstely $4.35 per n9uare foot. The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 havinq teceived the repart of the Mayor upon the above improvement, eiid having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no altErnatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE AAOVE foi estimated conatruction rates, financed by asseasmezzts and 1996 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearinq bs had on said improvement on 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chamhers Caurt Hau�e Buildinq in the City of 8aint Paul. � �;h the 7�}r day of Marcti, of the City Hsll and 3. Thet notice af said public hEaxinq re qiven to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimatad. COUNCILPER3QN5 Yeas Naya ��,akey ✓o trom �ris �E2 ��I ard �/R�tman ✓hune � AqRinst �� e No. ing F Rdepted by Covncil: Date . �__�yq � Certified Fassed by Counci ecretary BY ��, c� �/V�_�r� *--�. Mayor M . ,,. f 4�' r, ,, cxxx o� sx, pntr�. �� Caunci2 has heard a21 peraons, abjections and reaommendatioxis praposed impzovemeat and has fu1Zy aonsiciared tk:e szn;e; now, __ AIU.�_�ii6..:-`l iII� �B�L*� _ u.�� Tu the Matter g£ Cgnv�ru�ti.an and;gi rac�nstnioti.on oT �idewalk �t thY fv2t:,wir_s� 3oce=iUr,s: �U6 Juna Ave; 213� Reyar� Ave; 2127 Highie Pa 2173 Scheffer A?e; �18� Ifnapp o�: �335 � 239� V�ien±ine Fve; 2�22 � 217fi§ E. E`curth �t .. �MT:. . _ . • . _ _ 4\ , . pv'SIU�. ..ATES {OYs2 *;vo 't,`Y t:YY`e° f3..^iilTy' s�PUCtL:�e$} Rscenstructiou (replscement of old sidewalkl -�S7.il yer front Pavt for a Yive (5} fect wid� w�lk_ and 83.54 per fic?izt fc�t fcr ��ix (6} foot c�rid� walk. A11 other widths iaill be proreted accordingly. New aarsstruatina iw}iere n�, cvalk e�istedj - 10�� - vz" �l actuai cost e�ti:nate� tc k,� apnroximately $3.23 per sc�uare Poet. g11 corner residentia2 pro�,erties wil2 receiu� � credit up te the first 15C? feet oi new or reconstructed sidewalk a2ong an� abutting the "long �ide" of t?ie pr6�erty. } {Mrt�� '�j�$Tl '��Yi'2? fami3y St�llC$liT'26} ��TCYN RT'�ETTiF,'�TAT j3ATF.0 Far new and reaonstruct�� i�ehtalk; 100'k of act�aal co�t estimated tc� be appro:€imataly $4.35 per sc;uar� fovt. unuer Prelimir�ary S� °I'l - 3 a e� � T2xe Cauneil af th� Cit}+ af us3rit Fau1 has candu�tec� a pubiic he�ring u�on the ab+�ve imgro��anent, due n�itic� +_h�reof havinq besn �iven as presoriaet� ;�y tha City C2,�rEer; and WHEREA� Th� pertaininq to said ±her?fore, h� it R'�SOZVED, That the Ccuncil c-f th� City oP Saint Faul �3oes herehy crder that the abuve-described improvemEnt be made, antl the proper :.ity Off1CBT5 ara liereby diracted srd a�±t2iotirEC *o �roceed with ths imprav2�nent, a:�� e it FU'RTr�,R FtEvi.LV�l'3, That upon ti�� ca�plati�r. �f s�id i��ra�amer_•�, tiza proF,er Lity o€fiaers ahal"i aelcu3ate �12 ex�ens�s incurrad Lherain and �hall re�art thE asme t� che C:ity Council in accordance saith Chapter 14 of the City Charter. �4Ui�GILFEk8t7T3S Yeas 23ays �Iakey ✓soetroin ✓�arris l � Mor+'oN ��e� 3rd �ettman ✓'�iax:e �ic�opted by Ga Bate o 1 �, ��{ q'� CertiFied Pa��ad by Gvunci3 �ee-retary �ZkY E'&YGZ $� . �. ��_ , ./ /�. / �Againsc C�e/Lj �� ! `�� ?H�y^r Public Hearing Date — 3-26=97 Public Works Sidewatks } RE 1-2-97 —17-97 GREEN SHEET CONTACT PEfl50ti & PHONE � pEppp7MEN7 DIAECTOA Robert A. Lissick - 2666066 �N C17Y A7TOANEV NUMBHi WN MUSTBE014COUNCILAGENDRBY(DAS")c 2-5-9� MUSt be � BUOGETDIRECTOF in Gouncil Research Office by noon OMAYOR(ORASSISTMIT) Pri:da 1-24-97 TOTAL i OF SIGNANRE PAGES j _(CLIP ALL LOCA7IONS FOR SIGNANB� ASSOCViTE AGTION REIXlESTED +� �N,;''� Reconstnrcf Sidewalk in Ward 2tSee attached list) F►tE .Vp. 596051 _CNIL SERVICE CO1dMISS10N CIB COMMRTEE STAFF ' t�9� �Z� ;.1L OBJECTNE4 CLERK 8 MGT. SEFiVICES DEPARTMEFf�AL ACCOUMANi PEHSONAL SEHVICE CONTHACTS IAU3T ANSWEH THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: 1. Has ihis p�rs�n!F(m ever wo�ked under a contract for Wis departrnent? EY S NO 2. Nas this persoMim� ever been a ciry empioyee? YES NQ 3. Does ihis pereon/firm possess a skill not normally pwsessed by any curtent dry employee? YES NO Fsplain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green shaet ITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORiUNIT' (WHO. WHAT, WHEN, wHENt, wHr7: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akernating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These prob�ems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The cnmmunity will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk cnntracts are executed by private contractors, so it foflows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activiry. DiSADVANTAGES iF APPAOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still �af *�, remains controversial. yaaw�i4 �""""��" � �', '"� �a�h G9n$��' �'"� . :, �4;�� 2 � ��7 d r..e `?. .. .��. tADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROYE�: . - - - - - - This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in fu n will generaie more personal injury suits, ukimately resufting in the expenditure ofi iarger dollar amounts in eventual repaiTS andlor repfacemeM, as weli as cfaim payouts. � � - 3a o N O. �G'��''"'�— MITIAUDATE � fOTALAMOUMOF7RAN5ACT10NE 465.56 CAST/REVENUEBUDGETEO(CIRCLEONE) � NO FuNOwcsouace 96�hi-0665 A, eiA 96 = 53S:o0D ACRVITYNUMBEFi C96 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� A�T = 43Z,o0D C. Ct6 96 = 50,000 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION ��-� a a Ward 7 = r PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. FOURTH ST. from Pedersen St. to N. Winthrop St. at 2082 & 2084 E. Fourth St. Only. T ' �. i0�` IIHIT�ATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CQIQDITIOI�TS: This walk is poured concrete with off�ade and scaled panels. ................................................................... SUMMARY OF ENGII3EERING RECOMMENDATIOIV ��,�� t� Ward 2 � `' PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. JUNO AVE, from S. Victoria St. to S. Milton St. at 906 Juno Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade and asphalt patches. .................................................................. �t O SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS � I"�� Ward 3 , ! PROJECT: RECOI�ISTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BAYARD AVE, from S. Finn St. to S. Cretin Ave, at 2135 Bayard Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: T'his order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked paneis. PROJECT: RECONSTRi3CT SIDEWALK N.S. HIGHLAND PKVJY. from S. Cretin Ave. to Mt. Curve Blvd. at � j7 Highland Pkwy. Only. IPiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with offgrade ar�d scaled panels. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. SCHEFFER AVE. from S. Finn St. to S. Cretin Ave. at 2173 Scheffer Ave. Only. IPTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. SUMMARY OF E]VGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS ��-- 3 a-d Ward 4 � z PROJECT; CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. KNAPP ST. from Como Ave. to Knapp Pl. 2i 8' b XivA/� st. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from St. Anthony Park School. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is first time construction. ................................................................... PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. VALENTINE AVE. from Como Ave. to Keston St. at 2315 Valentine Ave. Only. IDTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with offgrade panels. PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. VALENTINE AVE. from Brompton St. to Eustis Ave. at 2394 Valentine Ave. Only. ITiITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with tree heaves. ................................................................... ��f�i �I��l'i! CITY OF ST. PAUL PXELIMINARY ORD$R �In Favor q'1- � a ,� �" � l . t�� 2.3,9,7 Tn the Matter of Construction endlor reconetructien of sidewelk et the fallowing looation9: 906 Juno Ave; 2135 Bayard Ave; 2117 Highland Parkway; 2173 Scheffer Ave; 2180 Knapp �t; 2315 5 2399 Velentine Ave; 20&2 � 2Q84 E. Fourth St Fi � : � � , . RFSTPENTt T, nm q(p two or three family �tructures) Reaonstruation (rEplecement of old sidewalk} - 87.21 per frvnt foot for e five �5) foet wide walk and $8.64 per fr�nt foot for a six (6) fe�t wlde walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. 13ew constxvction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.23 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will reosive a aredit up to the firat 150 feet of new or recanstructed sidews2k along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MITLTT- F�g D NTT T(More than three €amily structurea), 130N-REg7I}.NT7A7 AT S F�r new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actusl cost estimeted to be spproximstely $4.35 per n9uare foot. The Council of the City of Saint Pau1 havinq teceived the repart of the Mayor upon the above improvement, eiid having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no altErnatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE AAOVE foi estimated conatruction rates, financed by asseasmezzts and 1996 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearinq bs had on said improvement on 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chamhers Caurt Hau�e Buildinq in the City of 8aint Paul. � �;h the 7�}r day of Marcti, of the City Hsll and 3. Thet notice af said public hEaxinq re qiven to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimatad. COUNCILPER3QN5 Yeas Naya ��,akey ✓o trom �ris �E2 ��I ard �/R�tman ✓hune � AqRinst �� e No. ing F Rdepted by Covncil: Date . �__�yq � Certified Fassed by Counci ecretary BY ��, c� �/V�_�r� *--�. Mayor