The URL can be used to link to this page

97-1026CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCIL FILE NO. - 17 �' p S� SO FINAL ORDBR By File No. S97 96-597100 Voting Ward 7 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597096 - West side Algonquin Ave from Stillwater Ave to Case Ave 597097 - Both sides N Hazel St from E Fifth St to Margaret St & East side N Hazel St from E Fourth St to E Fifth St 597098 - Both sides N Howard St from Wilson Ave to Conway St & Both sides Howard Court from N Howard St to Cul-de-sac 597099 - Both sides Margaret St from N White Bear Ave to N Hazel St 597100 - Both sides Tower St from Wilson Ave to Conway St ��_�Da�G *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, tWO or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front £oot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � � '" � �� approved ��`$' . � °�� h � The Council of the City of 5aint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays 1/Blakey �strom �llins �rris �egard �rton Thune — ��Ser�,� �In Favor �_Against � ��Qse.YV� Adopted by Council: Date�9`� Certified Passed by Council 5ecretary Sy � , lils° �L c Mayor �ublic�Hearing Date — August 13, 1997 RE 6-6-97 �Z � OEPARSMENT/OFFICFIGOUNCIL �^��T�^� GREEN SHEET r,o.�$�� Public Works Sidewalks 5-21-97 INITIAVDAiE INR E WNTACTPERSON&Pk�NE pEpppS}J,Ef7T�fRECTOR �CfSYCAUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 A��'N CITYATTORNEV �CITVCLERK NUMBHtFOR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(�ATE) ( �R BUDGE7DIRECTOR �F1N.eMGT.SERVIGESDIR Must be in Council Research Office MAVOF(OfiASSISTM7T) 1�Couna7 Research TOTAL X OF SIGNRTUNE PAGES j _(CIIP ALL LOCA710t1S FOR SIGNATURE) ASSOCIpTE � NTAL ACCDUMANT ACTION pEWES7ED �'�✓�� Construd 8 Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 7(See attached list) 9 - RECOMMENDA r�s:upprae(fqoraejea(� pEpSpNALSEflVICEC:ONTRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEWLLONflNGW1ESTIONS: PLANNING COAiMISSpN CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has ihispersorVfmt ever wo�ked under a contrac[ fw Nis depsrttnen[? — EY S NO CIB CoMMf17EE 2- Has this personlfirm ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A S7AFf 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normaly possessed by arry curtent aty — — employee? _DISTRICTCOUNCIL�.? Z _ YES NO SUPPORTS VhiiCH COUNCII �iECTNE? �P��^ �� Y� ansxrers on separate sheat and aitaeh to g�een sheet � INITIATING ROBL M, ISSUE, OPPORiUNIN (NMO. WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WFR�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freerthaw cycles, service i'rfe limks, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVEO: The community will benefi[ from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk coMracts are executed by private contractors, so d follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DtSAOVANTAGES IF APPROVFA: Histor'�cally, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of cnnstruction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detesi assessmenis, and despite the fact up to one-halt the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEp: This option would ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTHANSACTIONS 23��2Fi.8� COST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSWRCE 97-�M°0667 A, PCA 9� _. 557,000 pCITVITYNUMBEH C97�2T729>078k-27012 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B�, AST � 3�Q-�OOO " c, eEa 97 = 5o,aoo SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 7 59�D�� /�O(7 ��` PROJECT: CONSTRUCT & RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS W.S. AI.CONQUIN AVE. from Stillwater Ave. to Case Ave. IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complai�its and an inspection of the walk. ERISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and cracked panels. PRO�TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. N. HAZEL ST. from E. Fifth St. to Margaret St: & E.S. N. HAZEL ST. from E. Fourth St. to E. F�fth St. AHITIATING ACTION; This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of six (6) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, setfled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTT2UCT SIDEWALH B.S. N. HOWARD ST. from Wffson r Q /� Ave. to Conway St. & B.S. HOWARD COURT from N. Howard St. to Cul-De- � ! I �q$ Sac. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. , �V[� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. MARGARET ST. from N. White Bear Ave. to N. Hazel St. I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1J signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. -2- �� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. TOWER ST. from Wilson Ave. / b �� to Conway St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works )q�`�v as public necessity on the basis of nine (9) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... � � �� -�� b� *ESTIMATED CON5TRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstx (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the ^long side" of the property. ML3LTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2. 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., 9.n the Counci.l Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COL7I3CILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey ✓�ostrom �llins �rris �gard �rton �ne � In Eavor � Against Adopted by Council: Date ��i��(� Certified Passed by Council Secretiary By �� - _ �,\� _� Mayor CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCIL FILE NO. - 17 �' p S� SO FINAL ORDBR By File No. S97 96-597100 Voting Ward 7 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597096 - West side Algonquin Ave from Stillwater Ave to Case Ave 597097 - Both sides N Hazel St from E Fifth St to Margaret St & East side N Hazel St from E Fourth St to E Fifth St 597098 - Both sides N Howard St from Wilson Ave to Conway St & Both sides Howard Court from N Howard St to Cul-de-sac 597099 - Both sides Margaret St from N White Bear Ave to N Hazel St 597100 - Both sides Tower St from Wilson Ave to Conway St ��_�Da�G *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, tWO or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front £oot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � � '" � �� approved ��`$' . � °�� h � The Council of the City of 5aint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays 1/Blakey �strom �llins �rris �egard �rton Thune — ��Ser�,� �In Favor �_Against � ��Qse.YV� Adopted by Council: Date�9`� Certified Passed by Council 5ecretary Sy � , lils° �L c Mayor �ublic�Hearing Date — August 13, 1997 RE 6-6-97 �Z � OEPARSMENT/OFFICFIGOUNCIL �^��T�^� GREEN SHEET r,o.�$�� Public Works Sidewalks 5-21-97 INITIAVDAiE INR E WNTACTPERSON&Pk�NE pEpppS}J,Ef7T�fRECTOR �CfSYCAUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 A��'N CITYATTORNEV �CITVCLERK NUMBHtFOR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(�ATE) ( �R BUDGE7DIRECTOR �F1N.eMGT.SERVIGESDIR Must be in Council Research Office MAVOF(OfiASSISTM7T) 1�Couna7 Research TOTAL X OF SIGNRTUNE PAGES j _(CIIP ALL LOCA710t1S FOR SIGNATURE) ASSOCIpTE � NTAL ACCDUMANT ACTION pEWES7ED �'�✓�� Construd 8 Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 7(See attached list) 9 - RECOMMENDA r�s:upprae(fqoraejea(� pEpSpNALSEflVICEC:ONTRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEWLLONflNGW1ESTIONS: PLANNING COAiMISSpN CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has ihispersorVfmt ever wo�ked under a contrac[ fw Nis depsrttnen[? — EY S NO CIB CoMMf17EE 2- Has this personlfirm ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A S7AFf 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normaly possessed by arry curtent aty — — employee? _DISTRICTCOUNCIL�.? Z _ YES NO SUPPORTS VhiiCH COUNCII �iECTNE? �P��^ �� Y� ansxrers on separate sheat and aitaeh to g�een sheet � INITIATING ROBL M, ISSUE, OPPORiUNIN (NMO. WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WFR�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freerthaw cycles, service i'rfe limks, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVEO: The community will benefi[ from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk coMracts are executed by private contractors, so d follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DtSAOVANTAGES IF APPROVFA: Histor'�cally, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of cnnstruction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detesi assessmenis, and despite the fact up to one-halt the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEp: This option would ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTHANSACTIONS 23��2Fi.8� COST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSWRCE 97-�M°0667 A, PCA 9� _. 557,000 pCITVITYNUMBEH C97�2T729>078k-27012 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B�, AST � 3�Q-�OOO " c, eEa 97 = 5o,aoo SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 7 59�D�� /�O(7 ��` PROJECT: CONSTRUCT & RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS W.S. AI.CONQUIN AVE. from Stillwater Ave. to Case Ave. IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complai�its and an inspection of the walk. ERISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and cracked panels. PRO�TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. N. HAZEL ST. from E. Fifth St. to Margaret St: & E.S. N. HAZEL ST. from E. Fourth St. to E. F�fth St. AHITIATING ACTION; This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of six (6) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, setfled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTT2UCT SIDEWALH B.S. N. HOWARD ST. from Wffson r Q /� Ave. to Conway St. & B.S. HOWARD COURT from N. Howard St. to Cul-De- � ! I �q$ Sac. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. , �V[� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. MARGARET ST. from N. White Bear Ave. to N. Hazel St. I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1J signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. -2- �� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. TOWER ST. from Wilson Ave. / b �� to Conway St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works )q�`�v as public necessity on the basis of nine (9) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... � � �� -�� b� *ESTIMATED CON5TRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstx (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the ^long side" of the property. ML3LTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2. 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., 9.n the Counci.l Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COL7I3CILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey ✓�ostrom �llins �rris �gard �rton �ne � In Eavor � Against Adopted by Council: Date ��i��(� Certified Passed by Council Secretiary By �� - _ �,\� _� Mayor CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCIL FILE NO. - 17 �' p S� SO FINAL ORDBR By File No. S97 96-597100 Voting Ward 7 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597096 - West side Algonquin Ave from Stillwater Ave to Case Ave 597097 - Both sides N Hazel St from E Fifth St to Margaret St & East side N Hazel St from E Fourth St to E Fifth St 597098 - Both sides N Howard St from Wilson Ave to Conway St & Both sides Howard Court from N Howard St to Cul-de-sac 597099 - Both sides Margaret St from N White Bear Ave to N Hazel St 597100 - Both sides Tower St from Wilson Ave to Conway St ��_�Da�G *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, tWO or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front £oot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � � '" � �� approved ��`$' . � °�� h � The Council of the City of 5aint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays 1/Blakey �strom �llins �rris �egard �rton Thune — ��Ser�,� �In Favor �_Against � ��Qse.YV� Adopted by Council: Date�9`� Certified Passed by Council 5ecretary Sy � , lils° �L c Mayor �ublic�Hearing Date — August 13, 1997 RE 6-6-97 �Z � OEPARSMENT/OFFICFIGOUNCIL �^��T�^� GREEN SHEET r,o.�$�� Public Works Sidewalks 5-21-97 INITIAVDAiE INR E WNTACTPERSON&Pk�NE pEpppS}J,Ef7T�fRECTOR �CfSYCAUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 A��'N CITYATTORNEV �CITVCLERK NUMBHtFOR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(�ATE) ( �R BUDGE7DIRECTOR �F1N.eMGT.SERVIGESDIR Must be in Council Research Office MAVOF(OfiASSISTM7T) 1�Couna7 Research TOTAL X OF SIGNRTUNE PAGES j _(CIIP ALL LOCA710t1S FOR SIGNATURE) ASSOCIpTE � NTAL ACCDUMANT ACTION pEWES7ED �'�✓�� Construd 8 Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 7(See attached list) 9 - RECOMMENDA r�s:upprae(fqoraejea(� pEpSpNALSEflVICEC:ONTRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEWLLONflNGW1ESTIONS: PLANNING COAiMISSpN CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has ihispersorVfmt ever wo�ked under a contrac[ fw Nis depsrttnen[? — EY S NO CIB CoMMf17EE 2- Has this personlfirm ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A S7AFf 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normaly possessed by arry curtent aty — — employee? _DISTRICTCOUNCIL�.? Z _ YES NO SUPPORTS VhiiCH COUNCII �iECTNE? �P��^ �� Y� ansxrers on separate sheat and aitaeh to g�een sheet � INITIATING ROBL M, ISSUE, OPPORiUNIN (NMO. WHAT, WHEN. WHERE. WFR�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freerthaw cycles, service i'rfe limks, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVEO: The community will benefi[ from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk coMracts are executed by private contractors, so d follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DtSAOVANTAGES IF APPROVFA: Histor'�cally, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of cnnstruction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detesi assessmenis, and despite the fact up to one-halt the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEp: This option would ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTHANSACTIONS 23��2Fi.8� COST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDINGSWRCE 97-�M°0667 A, PCA 9� _. 557,000 pCITVITYNUMBEH C97�2T729>078k-27012 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B�, AST � 3�Q-�OOO " c, eEa 97 = 5o,aoo SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 7 59�D�� /�O(7 ��` PROJECT: CONSTRUCT & RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS W.S. AI.CONQUIN AVE. from Stillwater Ave. to Case Ave. IIvITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complai�its and an inspection of the walk. ERISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled and cracked panels. PRO�TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALS B.S. N. HAZEL ST. from E. Fifth St. to Margaret St: & E.S. N. HAZEL ST. from E. Fourth St. to E. F�fth St. AHITIATING ACTION; This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of six (6) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, setfled and cracked panels. PROJECT: RECONSTT2UCT SIDEWALH B.S. N. HOWARD ST. from Wffson r Q /� Ave. to Conway St. & B.S. HOWARD COURT from N. Howard St. to Cul-De- � ! I �q$ Sac. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. , �V[� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. MARGARET ST. from N. White Bear Ave. to N. Hazel St. I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1J signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. .................................................................. -2- �� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg B.S. TOWER ST. from Wilson Ave. / b �� to Conway St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works )q�`�v as public necessity on the basis of nine (9) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... � � �� -�� b� *ESTIMATED CON5TRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstx (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the ^long side" of the property. ML3LTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2. 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., 9.n the Counci.l Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COL7I3CILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey ✓�ostrom �llins �rris �gard �rton �ne � In Eavor � Against Adopted by Council: Date ��i��(� Certified Passed by Council Secretiary By �� - _ �,\� _� Mayor