The URL can be used to link to this page

97-1025CITY OF ST. PAUL � �+�e�� CO ��C� FILE NO. 1 r`IO� � FINAL ORDER By ��Q��'fLt/ O File No. 597090-597095 Voting Ward 6 Ia the Mattar of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597090 - Both sides E Arlington Ave from N White Bear Ave to N Hazel St 597Q91 - Both sides Germain St from & Seventh St to Stillwater Ave 597092 - Both sicles E Idaho Ave from Atlantic St to Chamber St 597093 - Both sides E Idaho Ave from Hazelwood St to Germain St & the South side of E Idaho Ave from Germain St to Kennard St. 597094 - Both sides E Montana Ave from N White Sear Ave to N Hazel St — Za+c� o�E� -f� A��t �'7, iR9'7 597095 - Both sides Stillwater Ave from Hazelwood St to Germain St � *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIQN RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recoastruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � t l S � approved ��` \� V 1 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, there£ore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of Said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of tlze City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey �strom �lins arris Me ard}--��ise,.�- � orton Thune- ahS�}- J In Favor _QAga ins t � A-bseri Adopted by Council: Date�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary or Public'�earin Date — Au ust 13, 1997 BE 6-6-97 �i DEPAFThIENT/OFFICE/COUNCfL DAIEINRIA7ED GREEN SHEET �NO.38551�eS� Public Works Sidewaiks 5'2�-97 INITIAUDA7E INITIAWATE CONTACT PEFSON & PHONE � DFPARTMENT OIqECTOR � CIN COUNCIL RObert A. Lissick - 266-6121 N wx � cm arroqniEV � CRY CLEFiK MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(DAl'EJ (� p �BUDGEfDIRECTOF �FIN.BMGT.SERVICESDIF Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOFi(OFASSISTANT) 10 Coundl Research b noon Erida 6-13-97 � TMAL �` OF 31GNANRE PAGES 1 __ (CLJP ALL LOCA7WtLS WR 31GMATUR� 0.SSOCIATE PA EM/LL ACCOUKfAM f�T10NREQUESTEO J'�+G�OZ ( Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) ��L. � qECOMMENDA710N5: Appwe (A) w qeject (Fry pEpSONp� SERVICE CONTflACTS MUST ANSWEp THE FOLLOWING IXIESTIONS: _ PLpNNING COMMISSION _CNIL SEAVICE CAMMISSfON 1. NeS ihls pB(SOtVGtm�e Yrotked undet a EORtfaCC fof iFt15 depa[trnent2 Y CIB GOMMfREE 2. H25 iFlis p et50�ffilm evef bBBn a dty emplOyee? — YES NO A S7AFF 3. Does Nis parson/firm possess a skill not rwrmaly possessed by arry curren[ ciry �ois7Ric7coUtuci� �5 _ employee? YES NO SUPPOflTS WHICH COUNCIL JECTNE? �P�ai� all yBS ansWe�s on Sepafate she6t and attaeh to gfean Sheat NJRIATNJG PAOH EM, ISSUE, OPPOR7UNRY (WF70, WFfAT, WHEN, WHEAE, WHY): The probiem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating free/thaw cycles, service I'rfe lim@s, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk wndition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVAMAGES IF APPPOVED: The corhmunity will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for Rs many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so ft fiollows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply staied, property owners datest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. ��r� ��3�:`;m� .lUN Ey� 1�97 DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: � w.-..-d–. „... .... _.N «,s.zn This optio� would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiA generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs andlor replacement, as weil as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNTOFTMNSACTIONS 36.83S��S COST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(qRCLEONE) YES� NO FUNDINGSOURCE 9.��P'I°'OG6] A P�`A g] _� SS]s00O ACINITYNUMBEFi C "ZT Z^O Hl4-2 O�2 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAI� ��. AST = 3aa, o00 C, CIB 97 =. 50,040 � SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATIONS ..: �Z `� � PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. E. ARLINGTON AVE. from N. j �� D � White Bear Ave. to N. Hazel St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the waik. EIIISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, setfled and cracked paneis. ................................................................. s9?dql PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. GERMAIN ST. from E. Seventh St. to Stillwater Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was fnitiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and settled panels. ................................................................... �1�09Z PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. IDAHO AVE. from Atlantic St. to Chamber St. I1ITITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Pubiic Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1j signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. PROJECT: RECO1�iSTRUCT SIDEWAI.H B.S. E. IDAHO AVE. from j� nOQ� Hazelwood St. to Germain St. & S.S. E. IDAHO AVE. from Germain St. to < < Kennard St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection af the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves. asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... �9'?09H pROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI.S B.S. E. MONTANAAVE. from N. White Bear Ave. to N. Hazel St. -2- �� 7�� O� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) compiaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, off'grade, asphait patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... ��95 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. STILLWATER AVE. from Hazelwood St. to Germain St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, offgrade, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and setfled panels. ................................................................... ��T / 015 *ESTIMATED CON5TRUCTIOIV RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wallc. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Aa11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �akey � strom �11 ins �rris �gard �rton �e � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date l l``� Certified Passed by Counci Secretary or CITY OF ST. PAUL � �+�e�� CO ��C� FILE NO. 1 r`IO� � FINAL ORDER By ��Q��'fLt/ O File No. 597090-597095 Voting Ward 6 Ia the Mattar of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597090 - Both sides E Arlington Ave from N White Bear Ave to N Hazel St 597Q91 - Both sides Germain St from & Seventh St to Stillwater Ave 597092 - Both sicles E Idaho Ave from Atlantic St to Chamber St 597093 - Both sides E Idaho Ave from Hazelwood St to Germain St & the South side of E Idaho Ave from Germain St to Kennard St. 597094 - Both sides E Montana Ave from N White Sear Ave to N Hazel St — Za+c� o�E� -f� A��t �'7, iR9'7 597095 - Both sides Stillwater Ave from Hazelwood St to Germain St � *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIQN RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recoastruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � t l S � approved ��` \� V 1 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, there£ore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of Said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of tlze City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey �strom �lins arris Me ard}--��ise,.�- � orton Thune- ahS�}- J In Favor _QAga ins t � A-bseri Adopted by Council: Date�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary or Public'�earin Date — Au ust 13, 1997 BE 6-6-97 �i DEPAFThIENT/OFFICE/COUNCfL DAIEINRIA7ED GREEN SHEET �NO.38551�eS� Public Works Sidewaiks 5'2�-97 INITIAUDA7E INITIAWATE CONTACT PEFSON & PHONE � DFPARTMENT OIqECTOR � CIN COUNCIL RObert A. Lissick - 266-6121 N wx � cm arroqniEV � CRY CLEFiK MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(DAl'EJ (� p �BUDGEfDIRECTOF �FIN.BMGT.SERVICESDIF Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOFi(OFASSISTANT) 10 Coundl Research b noon Erida 6-13-97 � TMAL �` OF 31GNANRE PAGES 1 __ (CLJP ALL LOCA7WtLS WR 31GMATUR� 0.SSOCIATE PA EM/LL ACCOUKfAM f�T10NREQUESTEO J'�+G�OZ ( Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) ��L. � qECOMMENDA710N5: Appwe (A) w qeject (Fry pEpSONp� SERVICE CONTflACTS MUST ANSWEp THE FOLLOWING IXIESTIONS: _ PLpNNING COMMISSION _CNIL SEAVICE CAMMISSfON 1. NeS ihls pB(SOtVGtm�e Yrotked undet a EORtfaCC fof iFt15 depa[trnent2 Y CIB GOMMfREE 2. H25 iFlis p et50�ffilm evef bBBn a dty emplOyee? — YES NO A S7AFF 3. Does Nis parson/firm possess a skill not rwrmaly possessed by arry curren[ ciry �ois7Ric7coUtuci� �5 _ employee? YES NO SUPPOflTS WHICH COUNCIL JECTNE? �P�ai� all yBS ansWe�s on Sepafate she6t and attaeh to gfean Sheat NJRIATNJG PAOH EM, ISSUE, OPPOR7UNRY (WF70, WFfAT, WHEN, WHEAE, WHY): The probiem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating free/thaw cycles, service I'rfe lim@s, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk wndition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVAMAGES IF APPPOVED: The corhmunity will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for Rs many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so ft fiollows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply staied, property owners datest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. ��r� ��3�:`;m� .lUN Ey� 1�97 DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: � w.-..-d–. „... .... _.N «,s.zn This optio� would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiA generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs andlor replacement, as weil as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNTOFTMNSACTIONS 36.83S��S COST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(qRCLEONE) YES� NO FUNDINGSOURCE 9.��P'I°'OG6] A P�`A g] _� SS]s00O ACINITYNUMBEFi C "ZT Z^O Hl4-2 O�2 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAI� ��. AST = 3aa, o00 C, CIB 97 =. 50,040 � SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATIONS ..: �Z `� � PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. E. ARLINGTON AVE. from N. j �� D � White Bear Ave. to N. Hazel St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the waik. EIIISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, setfled and cracked paneis. ................................................................. s9?dql PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. GERMAIN ST. from E. Seventh St. to Stillwater Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was fnitiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and settled panels. ................................................................... �1�09Z PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. IDAHO AVE. from Atlantic St. to Chamber St. I1ITITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Pubiic Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1j signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. PROJECT: RECO1�iSTRUCT SIDEWAI.H B.S. E. IDAHO AVE. from j� nOQ� Hazelwood St. to Germain St. & S.S. E. IDAHO AVE. from Germain St. to < < Kennard St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection af the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves. asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... �9'?09H pROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI.S B.S. E. MONTANAAVE. from N. White Bear Ave. to N. Hazel St. -2- �� 7�� O� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) compiaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, off'grade, asphait patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... ��95 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. STILLWATER AVE. from Hazelwood St. to Germain St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, offgrade, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and setfled panels. ................................................................... ��T / 015 *ESTIMATED CON5TRUCTIOIV RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wallc. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Aa11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �akey � strom �11 ins �rris �gard �rton �e � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date l l``� Certified Passed by Counci Secretary or CITY OF ST. PAUL � �+�e�� CO ��C� FILE NO. 1 r`IO� � FINAL ORDER By ��Q��'fLt/ O File No. 597090-597095 Voting Ward 6 Ia the Mattar of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597090 - Both sides E Arlington Ave from N White Bear Ave to N Hazel St 597Q91 - Both sides Germain St from & Seventh St to Stillwater Ave 597092 - Both sicles E Idaho Ave from Atlantic St to Chamber St 597093 - Both sides E Idaho Ave from Hazelwood St to Germain St & the South side of E Idaho Ave from Germain St to Kennard St. 597094 - Both sides E Montana Ave from N White Sear Ave to N Hazel St — Za+c� o�E� -f� A��t �'7, iR9'7 597095 - Both sides Stillwater Ave from Hazelwood St to Germain St � *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIQN RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recoastruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order � t l S � approved ��` \� V 1 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, there£ore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of Said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of tlze City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey �strom �lins arris Me ard}--��ise,.�- � orton Thune- ahS�}- J In Favor _QAga ins t � A-bseri Adopted by Council: Date�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary or Public'�earin Date — Au ust 13, 1997 BE 6-6-97 �i DEPAFThIENT/OFFICE/COUNCfL DAIEINRIA7ED GREEN SHEET �NO.38551�eS� Public Works Sidewaiks 5'2�-97 INITIAUDA7E INITIAWATE CONTACT PEFSON & PHONE � DFPARTMENT OIqECTOR � CIN COUNCIL RObert A. Lissick - 266-6121 N wx � cm arroqniEV � CRY CLEFiK MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(DAl'EJ (� p �BUDGEfDIRECTOF �FIN.BMGT.SERVICESDIF Must be in Council Research Office � MAYOFi(OFASSISTANT) 10 Coundl Research b noon Erida 6-13-97 � TMAL �` OF 31GNANRE PAGES 1 __ (CLJP ALL LOCA7WtLS WR 31GMATUR� 0.SSOCIATE PA EM/LL ACCOUKfAM f�T10NREQUESTEO J'�+G�OZ ( Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) ��L. � qECOMMENDA710N5: Appwe (A) w qeject (Fry pEpSONp� SERVICE CONTflACTS MUST ANSWEp THE FOLLOWING IXIESTIONS: _ PLpNNING COMMISSION _CNIL SEAVICE CAMMISSfON 1. NeS ihls pB(SOtVGtm�e Yrotked undet a EORtfaCC fof iFt15 depa[trnent2 Y CIB GOMMfREE 2. H25 iFlis p et50�ffilm evef bBBn a dty emplOyee? — YES NO A S7AFF 3. Does Nis parson/firm possess a skill not rwrmaly possessed by arry curren[ ciry �ois7Ric7coUtuci� �5 _ employee? YES NO SUPPOflTS WHICH COUNCIL JECTNE? �P�ai� all yBS ansWe�s on Sepafate she6t and attaeh to gfean Sheat NJRIATNJG PAOH EM, ISSUE, OPPOR7UNRY (WF70, WFfAT, WHEN, WHEAE, WHY): The probiem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating free/thaw cycles, service I'rfe lim@s, chemical additives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk wndition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVAMAGES IF APPPOVED: The corhmunity will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for Rs many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so ft fiollows that private sector jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply staied, property owners datest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. ��r� ��3�:`;m� .lUN Ey� 1�97 DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: � w.-..-d–. „... .... _.N «,s.zn This optio� would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wiA generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs andlor replacement, as weil as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNTOFTMNSACTIONS 36.83S��S COST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(qRCLEONE) YES� NO FUNDINGSOURCE 9.��P'I°'OG6] A P�`A g] _� SS]s00O ACINITYNUMBEFi C "ZT Z^O Hl4-2 O�2 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAI� ��. AST = 3aa, o00 C, CIB 97 =. 50,040 � SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIMENDATIONS ..: �Z `� � PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. E. ARLINGTON AVE. from N. j �� D � White Bear Ave. to N. Hazel St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the waik. EIIISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, setfled and cracked paneis. ................................................................. s9?dql PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. GERMAIN ST. from E. Seventh St. to Stillwater Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was fnitiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and settled panels. ................................................................... �1�09Z PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. IDAHO AVE. from Atlantic St. to Chamber St. I1ITITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Pubiic Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1j signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. PROJECT: RECO1�iSTRUCT SIDEWAI.H B.S. E. IDAHO AVE. from j� nOQ� Hazelwood St. to Germain St. & S.S. E. IDAHO AVE. from Germain St. to < < Kennard St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection af the walk. E%ISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves. asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... �9'?09H pROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI.S B.S. E. MONTANAAVE. from N. White Bear Ave. to N. Hazel St. -2- �� 7�� O� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) compiaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, off'grade, asphait patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ................................................................... ��95 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALH B.S. STILLWATER AVE. from Hazelwood St. to Germain St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, offgrade, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled and setfled panels. ................................................................... ��T / 015 *ESTIMATED CON5TRUCTIOIV RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot £or a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wallc. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Aa11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �akey � strom �11 ins �rris �gard �rton �e � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date l l``� Certified Passed by Counci Secretary or