The URL can be used to link to this page

97-1024CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. 1� �IO � �� FIAiAL ORDER � Fi No. 597089 Vo ng Ward 5 In t8e Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): East side o£ N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per £ront £oot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. Mi7LTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), I30N RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order `� — 1 S� approved � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays 7� lakey ✓B�ostrom follins 1� arri s � �Megard � �j�jSzr�,T i/MOrton Thune ._ '��cSe„�r,� Adopted by Council: Date -�..��. �T�q� CJ Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By a - �Against L � �� Mayor 'Public Hearing Date - August 13, 1997 RE 6-6-97 a'1-�,� DEPAflTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DATEINITIAIED GREEN SHEET NO.- Public Works Sidewalks 5-2�-97 �NI77AVDATE INfT1AL/DATE CONTACTPERSINJBPHONE �pEpppTMENTDIflECTOR �CfiYCOUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 �e�� C[iYATfORNEY ❑crrrc�wc MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DA7E) (��'L5� � � OgUpCE'(DIpECTOR ❑FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office MAYOPiOFASSISTAN� � Counal Research b noon Frida 6-13-97 � TOTALlOFSIGNA7UNEPAGES j _ (CIJPALLLOCA7iOi14PoRSIGNANNk] �nssocw� DEPAflTMENTALACCOfJNTANr ACTION flEWES7ED YJ' �a,� ,�} Reconsiruct Sidewalk in Ward S(See attached tist) °�� pECOMMENWi70NS:lypruve (tq or aeject (R) pEqgpNpL SERVICE CONiRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLON7NO �UESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CNIL SEPVICE COMMISSION �. � m � E �, �S � NO �� Under a ootlVact fof this departrnetlt? CIB COMMITTEE 2. Has this persorVfirtn ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A S7AFF _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not rrortnalty possessed by any cunent ciry — employee? _DISTRICTCWNCILr�o _ YES NO SUPPORTS NMICH COUNCIL OBJECTNE? ExWain all yes awwars on separou sheat and anaeh to grean sheet INIT TI G LEM, ISSUE, OPPOfl1UNIN (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WFIY): . The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, altemating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemica4 additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a ci[ywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuriss Srom iatls and possibfe fitigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Tfie community will benefit from this project because it will provide sate detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this ac[ivity. OISADVANTAGES IF APPpOVEO: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simpfy stated, properly owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to ons-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains co�troversial. t ,�� JUN p� 1��' DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This opifon would allow the i�rastructure of sidewa4k stock to deteriorate, which in turn, �vill'gen�rate'more persoital injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNTOFTH0.NSAC710NE 2sSO3.LO COST/pEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO RINDINGSWRCE �J`'M^��J A PPA 97 �? pCITVITYNUMBER C47 �2T729�0784-27G12 PINANCIALMFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� I{ST � 3QO c, CFa 97 $ 50,000 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMII�NDATION ��- -�-� /01`1 Ward 5 i ��i ./ PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg E.S. N. HAMLINE AVE. from W. P,rlington Ave. to W. Nebraska Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settied and cracked panels. ................................................................... CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER �,�-►o�y COUNCIL FILE NO. �� J'\4 B � F' No._597089 v t'ng Ward_5 in tha Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(sj: East side of N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave *ESTIMATED COI3STRUCTIOI3 RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruct9.on (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wicle walk. All othez widths will be prorated accordingly. L3ew construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o£ the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More tlian three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construct�.on rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey '�ostrom ��ollins Harris � gard �rton ciPliune �In Favor QAgainst Adopted by Council: Date_rt�„_��(��q'� �1 � Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY � � �- � ,�J�..�,-_.�._ Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. 1� �IO � �� FIAiAL ORDER � Fi No. 597089 Vo ng Ward 5 In t8e Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): East side o£ N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per £ront £oot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. Mi7LTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), I30N RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order `� — 1 S� approved � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays 7� lakey ✓B�ostrom follins 1� arri s � �Megard � �j�jSzr�,T i/MOrton Thune ._ '��cSe„�r,� Adopted by Council: Date -�..��. �T�q� CJ Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By a - �Against L � �� Mayor 'Public Hearing Date - August 13, 1997 RE 6-6-97 a'1-�,� DEPAflTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DATEINITIAIED GREEN SHEET NO.- Public Works Sidewalks 5-2�-97 �NI77AVDATE INfT1AL/DATE CONTACTPERSINJBPHONE �pEpppTMENTDIflECTOR �CfiYCOUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 �e�� C[iYATfORNEY ❑crrrc�wc MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DA7E) (��'L5� � � OgUpCE'(DIpECTOR ❑FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office MAYOPiOFASSISTAN� � Counal Research b noon Frida 6-13-97 � TOTALlOFSIGNA7UNEPAGES j _ (CIJPALLLOCA7iOi14PoRSIGNANNk] �nssocw� DEPAflTMENTALACCOfJNTANr ACTION flEWES7ED YJ' �a,� ,�} Reconsiruct Sidewalk in Ward S(See attached tist) °�� pECOMMENWi70NS:lypruve (tq or aeject (R) pEqgpNpL SERVICE CONiRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLON7NO �UESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CNIL SEPVICE COMMISSION �. � m � E �, �S � NO �� Under a ootlVact fof this departrnetlt? CIB COMMITTEE 2. Has this persorVfirtn ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A S7AFF _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not rrortnalty possessed by any cunent ciry — employee? _DISTRICTCWNCILr�o _ YES NO SUPPORTS NMICH COUNCIL OBJECTNE? ExWain all yes awwars on separou sheat and anaeh to grean sheet INIT TI G LEM, ISSUE, OPPOfl1UNIN (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WFIY): . The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, altemating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemica4 additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a ci[ywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuriss Srom iatls and possibfe fitigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Tfie community will benefit from this project because it will provide sate detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this ac[ivity. OISADVANTAGES IF APPpOVEO: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simpfy stated, properly owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to ons-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains co�troversial. t ,�� JUN p� 1��' DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This opifon would allow the i�rastructure of sidewa4k stock to deteriorate, which in turn, �vill'gen�rate'more persoital injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNTOFTH0.NSAC710NE 2sSO3.LO COST/pEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO RINDINGSWRCE �J`'M^��J A PPA 97 �? pCITVITYNUMBER C47 �2T729�0784-27G12 PINANCIALMFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� I{ST � 3QO c, CFa 97 $ 50,000 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMII�NDATION ��- -�-� /01`1 Ward 5 i ��i ./ PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg E.S. N. HAMLINE AVE. from W. P,rlington Ave. to W. Nebraska Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settied and cracked panels. ................................................................... CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER �,�-►o�y COUNCIL FILE NO. �� J'\4 B � F' No._597089 v t'ng Ward_5 in tha Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(sj: East side of N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave *ESTIMATED COI3STRUCTIOI3 RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruct9.on (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wicle walk. All othez widths will be prorated accordingly. L3ew construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o£ the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More tlian three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construct�.on rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey '�ostrom ��ollins Harris � gard �rton ciPliune �In Favor QAgainst Adopted by Council: Date_rt�„_��(��q'� �1 � Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY � � �- � ,�J�..�,-_.�._ Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. 1� �IO � �� FIAiAL ORDER � Fi No. 597089 Vo ng Ward 5 In t8e Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): East side o£ N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement o£ old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per £ront £oot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. Mi7LTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), I30N RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. under Preliminary order `� — 1 S� approved � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays 7� lakey ✓B�ostrom follins 1� arri s � �Megard � �j�jSzr�,T i/MOrton Thune ._ '��cSe„�r,� Adopted by Council: Date -�..��. �T�q� CJ Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By a - �Against L � �� Mayor 'Public Hearing Date - August 13, 1997 RE 6-6-97 a'1-�,� DEPAflTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DATEINITIAIED GREEN SHEET NO.- Public Works Sidewalks 5-2�-97 �NI77AVDATE INfT1AL/DATE CONTACTPERSINJBPHONE �pEpppTMENTDIflECTOR �CfiYCOUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 �e�� C[iYATfORNEY ❑crrrc�wc MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DA7E) (��'L5� � � OgUpCE'(DIpECTOR ❑FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office MAYOPiOFASSISTAN� � Counal Research b noon Frida 6-13-97 � TOTALlOFSIGNA7UNEPAGES j _ (CIJPALLLOCA7iOi14PoRSIGNANNk] �nssocw� DEPAflTMENTALACCOfJNTANr ACTION flEWES7ED YJ' �a,� ,�} Reconsiruct Sidewalk in Ward S(See attached tist) °�� pECOMMENWi70NS:lypruve (tq or aeject (R) pEqgpNpL SERVICE CONiRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLON7NO �UESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CNIL SEPVICE COMMISSION �. � m � E �, �S � NO �� Under a ootlVact fof this departrnetlt? CIB COMMITTEE 2. Has this persorVfirtn ever been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A S7AFF _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not rrortnalty possessed by any cunent ciry — employee? _DISTRICTCWNCILr�o _ YES NO SUPPORTS NMICH COUNCIL OBJECTNE? ExWain all yes awwars on separou sheat and anaeh to grean sheet INIT TI G LEM, ISSUE, OPPOfl1UNIN (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WFIY): . The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, altemating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemica4 additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a ci[ywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuriss Srom iatls and possibfe fitigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Tfie community will benefit from this project because it will provide sate detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this ac[ivity. OISADVANTAGES IF APPpOVEO: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simpfy stated, properly owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to ons-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains co�troversial. t ,�� JUN p� 1��' DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This opifon would allow the i�rastructure of sidewa4k stock to deteriorate, which in turn, �vill'gen�rate'more persoital injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNTOFTH0.NSAC710NE 2sSO3.LO COST/pEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO RINDINGSWRCE �J`'M^��J A PPA 97 �? pCITVITYNUMBER C47 �2T729�0784-27G12 PINANCIALMFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B� I{ST � 3QO c, CFa 97 $ 50,000 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMII�NDATION ��- -�-� /01`1 Ward 5 i ��i ./ PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALg E.S. N. HAMLINE AVE. from W. P,rlington Ave. to W. Nebraska Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settied and cracked panels. ................................................................... CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER �,�-►o�y COUNCIL FILE NO. �� J'\4 B � F' No._597089 v t'ng Ward_5 in tha Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(sj: East side of N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave *ESTIMATED COI3STRUCTIOI3 RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruct9.on (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wicle walk. All othez widths will be prorated accordingly. L3ew construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" o£ the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More tlian three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City o£ Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construct�.on rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey '�ostrom ��ollins Harris � gard �rton ciPliune �In Favor QAgainst Adopted by Council: Date_rt�„_��(��q'� �1 � Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY � � �- � ,�J�..�,-_.�._ Mayor