The URL can be used to link to this page

95-988i a�, .�x T � � Cl2Y OF ST. PAIII. FIAAL ORDEB COUN L FILE NO�. l��Y BY � .Gei'r�b'.� �l+tw�».. 3�.��7 FileNo. 595106 Voting Ward 7 In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location{S):�" on both sides Reaney Avenue from Nortonia Ave. to N, Ruth Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTBUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAI. RATES (One, two or three familp structures) Beconstrnetioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All othet widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev constrnction (where no walk existed) - 100°l, of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.15 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abueting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.25 per square foot. under Preliminary order `` �j — Cn''� � approved__�\� * 1!�s The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Conncil has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefoce, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the Citp of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays '� �akey ✓Grimm � u e r i n � ��s.t.,�,� tJ.arris ✓I�,egard ��R� ttman t/Thune � � t � t � � � � In Favor � Against � - t - s�s�x�� Adopted by Council : Date �, r,n .�,�� c� Certified Passed by CouncilSecretary ♦� ♦ � �. ' � �i u » '" J � ��/Jll . Public Works Sidewalks 6-9-95 �' �g C �'� ] ry ' � v GREEN SHEET ,,{{�' NO. 31 INITIAUDATEe�_Y.� 1NITIAUDATE ., DEPAR7MENTDIPECTOP [_JC17YGOUNC�L_ ClTYATTORNEV �jCffYCLERK Bl10GETDtRECTOR QFIN.&YGT.SERVICES MAYOft(ORASSISTAFfi) 1❑ COLLf1CII F Li OF SIGNANHE PAGES i _(CUP ALL LOCAiIOtIS FOR S{GNATURE� � A3SOCIA7E u DEPA EMOL M..COUNTANr Ni REOUESTED " y� � .- � Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 7(See ffitached listy ' Eile No. 595106 tNMENDA7WNS: Approve (A) or Rejatt (F� PERSONAI SERYICE CONTRACTS MUST ANS WER THE FOLLAWIN6 QUESTIONS: PLANNMIGCAMMISSION _CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION �� S�iES��NO�worketlunderaCOntreCtfOtShi5deP3r411Bi1t? CIB COMMI77EE 2. Has thls pefsoNfifin ever been a tily etnployee? — VES NO SinFF 3. Does this personlfirm possess a skill not rwrmally possessed by any current ciry — employee? �ISTF2ICTCAUNCIL— Z YE9 NO �� ,��_ Exp{ainaflyesanswersonseparateshaetandattachtogreeasheet WaYd 7 The problem "detective sidewaik" was created because of tree roots, deleierious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corr�cted an an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condi[ion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian +njuries trom falls and possi6le litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The communi[y wiii benefit trom this project because it will provide safe detect iree sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it tollows that private sector jobs are cre ed as rGSUtt of t's , roiry. ��sSs�°� ;;��, � �� v� �e � � �� iF nPaaaveo: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessme�t. Simp{y stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is Ciiy subsidized, +t still remains controversial. This option would aliow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, w+ll generate more personal injury suits, ultimaiely resuiting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs andlor replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWMOFTRANSACTIQNS C 907.00 COSTlREVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUND�NGSWACE 95—t� A. PFA 95 = 515,000 qCITVITYNUMBEH C95-2T727-078A-27070 =MANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLpiN) 6, AS T = 416 x OOO c, crs 95 = 50,000 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIpN � S. q g8, Ward 7 S�ISI � 6 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT S{DEWAL►C B.S. REANEY AVE. from Nortonia Ave. to N. Ruth St. iNiT1ATiNG ACTlOt1: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on the basis oi two (2) complaints, a petition with one (i ) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scafed, settled and cracked panels. � 5 -qg8 ESTIMATED RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) - It;econ��ru��zozi (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per £ront foot £or�'a"'five (5) foot wide sidewalk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide sidewalk. All other widths will ba prorated accordingly. I?��r";:cti�St�"ua�ioi� (where no walk existed) - 100 0 of the actual cost�"esfimate3'�to be approximately $3.15 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the 2oaq`:;;side of the property. MULTI-RESIDEISTIAL (More than three Pamily structures) and NONRESI- DENTIAL RATES - For new and reconstructed sidewalk: 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.25 per square foot. PLEASE NOTE: Reconstruction will be at the existing width. Public Works will reconstruct some existing sidewalk that is 6 feet wide down to 5 feet wide in all cases where this is practical. This smaller width (5 Peet) is to keep the assessment at the lowest rate. If your walk is 6 feet wide and you and your neighbors prefer that width and are willing to accept the higher assessment rate, please contact the Sidewalk Division at 266-6120 to request your preference. 3�11'�tew Sxdei?�lks �1�.7.1:be coAStrt�c£ed 5-fee� . .._.,, _ - . . . .. , . . _... , ... wi�t�.< .. . ...:... . ..., , . ,: ...: Sidewalk reconstruction may consist o£ replacing from one panel to all of the panels in front of your property. The ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCIILATION on your notice shows the number of feet to be replaced. For questions regarding the construction andJor reconstruction of your sidewalk, please call 266-6120. 6��'� OF ST. PAIIL PEELI2iINAFY OBDER �� public hearing be given by the Charter, stating of the improvement and In the Matter o£ Sidewalk reconsCruction at the following location(s): on both sides Reaney Avenue from Nortonia Ave. to N. Ruth Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev constrnction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.15 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL Chan three family structures), NON-RESIAENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.25 per square foot. The Council of the City of SainC Paul having received the report o� the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1945 Public Smprovement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 16th_ day of August, 1995 , at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the CiCy Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Pau1. 3. That notice of said the manner provided hearing, the nature as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas / Nays ✓B,.akey t/�' i mm ✓Guerin ✓�r�rris i/Mygard ti'k� ttman i/fihune '1 In Favor � Against 3� `t s - `t88' COUNnC LtinrlLE N . __^� By ✓, ,t,..«� FileNo. 595106 Voting Ward__ _7_ __ to the persons and in the time and place of the total cost Chereof Adopted by Council: Date �.� 1�� Certified Passed by Counci Secretary By - \ � c..�,.., �. .�._�� ayor �� pITY OpWJ� s �.'� a s� , 6 ,�..� ; - o � .� ' - ��';sF .�`€�_ .-:.I ,� �F=-= er_e II ' 9 n E G ^ r � r !� �ssa Saint Paul City Public Hearing Public Improvement OWNER OR TAXPAYfiR Council � Notice Construction 9 s -qg8' COUNCIL DISTRICT #7 PLANNING COUNCIL #02 FILE # S95'!08• • ' PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION �"u� :��aa'�a ��L?s J!!L 2 4 1995 THE TIME: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 16, 1995 AT 3:30 P.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Fioor City Ha11-Court fiouse HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner will be considered by the Council at tfiis hearing. PURPOSE To consider approvai of the proposed project as follows: Reconstruction of sidewalk on both sides REANEY AVENUE from Nortonia Avenue to North Ruth Street. ESTIMATED If the City Councii approves tne project, all or part of the ASSESSMENT cost w+il be assessed againsi the benefitted properties. The INFORMATION ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is $ THIS AMOUNT W{LL NOT NEED TO BE PAID ALL RT dNE TIME! Please see PAYMENT INFORMATION on the reverse side of this notice and aiso the encfosure for additional project information. ESTIMATED ASSESSMEN7 CALCULATION CONTINUED ON REVERSE SlDE NOTIFlCATIQN DATE: 07/28/95