Loading...
95-987••�..»st Cl2Y OF SY. PAIIL FZNAL OBDEE ORIG{f�AL __ ..�� ; CODNCZL F.ILE/�IO. S J��� B �`r-%`�� �---- 3�sgl FileNo. S" 5105 Voting j�7ard 2 In the Matter of Slocking up of building opening (trap door} and casting a new sidewalk at 480 North Robert Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Beconstrnction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per tront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8,46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. $ev eonstrnction (where no walk existed) - 100°1, of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.15 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of Che property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 160% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.25 per square foot. under Preliminary order � �- _. �, `-} ('y approved� d„ � 1 � � �— The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due natice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WAEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hetebp directed and suthorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas� Nays B�akey ��G�r'i mm ✓G rin tis ard ettman �3'1�i u n e Adopted by Council: Date ,� �S"' Certified Passed by CouncilSecretary ` In Favor By � e (� Against Mayor Public Hearing bate — PARTMENTlOFFICElCAUNGI �biic Works Sidewalks MTAC7 PEq$pN & PHONE iomas P. Keefe - 266-6121 IST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DAT� Must be in Council Re lb, 1995 RE 6-9-95 GREEN SHEET DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR cm arroaNEv BUDGET DIEiEGTOA MAYOR (OF ASSISTANT) __ 1 _(C(1P ALL LOCATIONS PoR 9GNANR� u ASSOCIAiE Block Up Buiidirig Opening & Cast New Walk in Ward 2(See attached listj File No. 595105 r_*...m.�mu MAMENDpiIONS: ppprova (A) or Rejea (R� pEpgppp� SERVICE COtiTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLqNNiNG COMMISSION _ CNIL SERV7CE CAMMISSION 1. Ha5 ihis pefs �e�vet Worked undef a coniract fo[ ihis department? YE CIB COMMYTTEE 2. Nas N�is PerSONGrm evec heen a ciry employee? — YES NO STAPF 3. Does ihis persoNfirm possess a 5kill noC normally passessed by any arrent Ciry ' _ "_a — emPioyee? DISTRICTCOUNqL — l� YES NO ____ .__ __. ,__.,_.__ _ — Ezplain aIl yes answers on separete sheet and atlach to grean sheet f�iP. WaYd 2 (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, The pro6lem "defective sidewafk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, attemating free/thaw cycles, service liie limits, chemical additives, e�reme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Iftigations. The crommunity will benefit irom this project because it will provide saie detect free sidewalks for its many citizens, The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. Et��,v� �s e�,.��9�i �i,pi'd v � �..'�Se7� ij Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one•half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. This option wou{d aflow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ukimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. No. 31591 CITY COUNCIL CITYCLEflK FIN. 8 MGT. SF iOTAL OAAOUNTOFTRANSACTION $ 1. jQO. QO COSTlREVENUE BUDGETED (CIpCIE ONE) YES NO FlINDINGSOURCE 95-h1�0664 A, P1'A 95 = 575,0�0 ACRVITYNUMBER C95-2T727-0784-27070 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� AST = 4 S 6 x OOO C, Cl6 95 = SO,Q00 /_ _, SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION F���g� Ward 2 S9,j/OS PROJECT: BLOCK UP BUILDING OFENiNG & CAST NEW WALK E.S. N. ROSERT ST. from E. Seventh St. to E. Ninth St. at 480 N. Robert St. Only. iNiTiAT1NG ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDIT10tJS: improvement would be to biock up building opening and cast new waik. ............................................................................................. pS G1TY p��R�i ; ti'' s �•, , m `. O � j � €?g_"=1'ztli y c � =s== a€t .'ll a � �� s - s, A F I �+;� �859 �p� Saint Paul City Public Hearing Public Improvement OWNER OR TAXPAYER Council � Notice Construction ,��_��� COUNCIL DISTRICT #2 PLANNINCs COUNCIL #17 FILE # 595405 ° ` PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION �a�"�� .. ��� ���° �l�L � � 19�5 THE TIME: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST '16, �995 AT 3:30 P.M. PUBLIG PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall-Court House HEARI(JG Written or orai statements by any owner will be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE To cons+der approval of the proposed project as follows: 8locking up of building opening (trap door) and casting a new sidewalk at 4S0 NORTH ROBERT STREE7. ESTIMATED If the City Council approves the project, al{ or part of the ASSESSMENT cost will be assessed against the benefitted properties. Tha INFORMATfON ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is g THIS AMOUNT WILL NOT NEED TO BE PAID ALL AT ONE TfME! Piease see PAYMENT lNFORMATION on the reverse side of this notice . �xcdc�ads�cat��c�ot�s�cexk�a�a��sii�w����a�cxs ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT GALCULATION CONTiNUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICA7lON DATE: o7/2s/95 OR1Gl�lAL CITY OF ST. PAUL P&ELIMINAgY ORDEE .3D �� �� ILE N0. ileNo.��105 oting W rd 2_ In the Hatter of Blocking up of building opening (trap door) and casting a new sidewalk at 480 North Robert Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Beconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a five (5) fooe wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev constrnctioa (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.15 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to Che first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the properCy. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.25 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received Che report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That Che said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1995 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 16th_ day of August, 1995 , at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said the manner provided heating, the nature as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays B akey `��rimm ✓�uerin t/�arris gard R� Ctman r/'"fhune the persons and in time and place of total cost thereof Adopted by Council: Date ` �,S Certified Passed by Counci Secretary �In Favor &y � , R ���-c�(�� l� Against Mayor public hearing be given to by the Charter, stating the of the improvement and the