The URL can be used to link to this page

95-884ORIGIl�AL CZTY OF ST. PAIIL FINAL OgDEB (\ �� , � � �/�� S '�7 AMERDED �9 CO CIL FILE N0. /J'aa By . File No. 595093-595095 & 595102 Voting Ward 6 In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s): 595093 - on both sides Birmingham St. from East Arlington Ave. to East Nebraska Ave. 595094 - on the south side Case Ave. from Hazelwood St. to Kennard St. 595095 - on the north side East Cottage Ave. from Germain St. to Kennard St. S95096 - on both sides East Magnolia Ave. from Edgerton St. to Payne Ave. 595097 - at 1375 Mcafee St. S95098 - on the east side Nokomis Ave. from East Rose Ave. to East Maryland Ave. - . . -E as-t �_• L,.O, -f� ��.a3 �Y9s , *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) ReconstrucYion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev constrnction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.15 per square foot. All corner iesidential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.25 per square foot. �:� ,_ � _. ... �A.-: _ �::. , _ +, � , . ,.. , � . , ;,� " �:LL�:. �:� - under Preliminary order 95-601 45-��. .� �'��-�' ` � . � ,� � approved June 7, 1995 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Chartrer; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does he.reby order that the above–described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER BESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred there�n and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays �B3,ak ey �� mm ✓�y� rin t��.rris ✓Ffegard Rettman— {�hse*��' ✓l�hune �In Favor C3 Against 1 ��AS�e�T Adopted by Council: Date__�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary � �.��- G�i- .�aJ Public Hearin Date - Au ust 2, 1995 /�� ° T DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COl1NCIL DATE INITIATE� p Public Works Sidewalks 7-5-95 GREEN SHEE N_ 31475 CANTACT PERSON & PHONE INITIAVDATE INITIAVDATE O DEPAHRAENT DIRECTOF O CITY COUNCIL Thomas P. Keefe - 266-6121 ^��" Oc�nnrronNev �CITYCIERK MUST BE ON CAUNCIL AGENDA BV (DATE) T NUYBER FOP - PUB...IC ROUTING � BUDGET DIREC�OR � FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. F?EEiR�I�G�� $�T 3�0R`fY$GTiST 2; 1995. o"o�" O�YOF(ORASSISTANn � om il TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALl LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUREj ACTION flEOUESTED: To appxove AMENDED file number 545097 should be 1378 Mcafee St. RECAMMENDAT70NS: Approve (A) a Reject (R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TNE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _ PUINNING COMMISSION _ CIViL SERVICE COMMISSION �- Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for tbis department? - _ CIB COMMITTEE _ �'ES NO E1 StpFF 2. Has Mis personlfirm ever been a city employee? — — YES NO _ DIS7RICT C�3' COUriC�_ — 2 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any curtent city employee? SUPPORTSWHICHCOUNCILOBJECTIVE? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green shaet Neighborhoods Ward 6 INITIATING PROBIEM, ISSUE, OPP�RTUNIlY (Wlw, What, When, Whare, Why): "SEE ORGINIAL GREEN SHEET NUMBER 31589" ADVANTAGES IFAPPROVED. �iD4dP1�4� �T�i (;�i{4f JUL 0 7 1995 - --------�---.__ _..,� DISADVANTAGES tf APPROYED: DISADVANTAGES �F NOT APPROVED TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSAC710N $ COST/HEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) VES NO FUNDIHG SOURCE AC71VI7Y NUMBEH FINANCIAL INFOFMATION: (EXPLAIN) Public Hearin Date - Au ust 2 1995 RE 5-26-95 n Q^ 7EPARTMENT/OFFlCEdAUNdL DATEINITIA7ED GREEN SHEET NO. ` Public Works Sidewalks 5-9-9$ �NITIAUDATE INffIAVDATE CAMACT PE0.SON b PNONE � pFpqqTMENT DIFECTOR � CITY LOUNCIL Thomas P. Keefe - 266-6121 ASSIGH ❑ C1iV ATIOANEY � LITV CLERK NUMBFAfOR MUST BE ON COUNGII AGENDA BY (DA'fE) 6-14-g5 ROUTINC �gUDGET �iRECTOR � FIN. b MGT. SERVICES DI Must be in Council Research Office °pD� MAYOfl(ORASSISTANn t[]Coundl Research no ater than noon Frida 6- -9 ❑ TOTAL I OF SIGNANRE GAGES 1 _(CL1P ALL LOCAtIONS FOp 9GNATURE) � ASSOCIA7E D'ePAflTMEMAL A:.COUMANT ACTION FEOUESTED Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) �� . �� )�� File No. 595093-98, 595102 ° I RECAMMENDATIONS:f�prore (/Q or Rejeq (R) p@RSONAL SEflVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANS WEB THE FOLLO WING QUESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMMISSION _CNR SEflVICE CAMMISSION �- H � ��'`' � �` NOer worked u�der e co�Vacc tw Nis department? C1B COMMITiEE 2. Nzs Ni5 r50�rm evet 6een a City emp�oyee? — — YES NO A S7AFF � 3. Dxs this persoNfirm possess a skill not normally Aosses5ed try any curre�t ciry — — employee? DiSTRICTCAUrvCIL— Z YE$ NO SUPPOF7S Wr+ICH CoUNGI OBJECTNE4 Euplain all yes answers on separale sheat and attach to green sheat Neighborhoods Ward 6 IN4TU+TING GROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTt3N4TY (WHO. YAiAT, WHEN, YMERE, WViV): The probfem'defective sidewalk' was created because oS tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freelthaw cycles, service life limfts, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorreMed, the sidewalk condftion wouid worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from ialls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefit from this projeci because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for fts many citizens. The sidewafk contracts are executed by private contradors, so R folfows that private sector jobs are created as a resu% ot this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historicaliy, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the tact up to one-half the assessment is Ciry subsidized, it still remains coMroversiai. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: 'fhis option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of Iarger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTAL AMOUM OFTRANSACTION S 1� GO �. 00 COSTIREYENUE BUOGE7ED (CIRCLE ONE) YES nw FUNDINGSOUHCE 95-M-o664 A. PIA 95 � 515,0�� ACfiVITYNUMBER Cg5-2T727 -0784-27010 FINANCIAL INFORAIATION: (EXPIAIN) g, AST = 416 � OOO � c. cia 95 = 50,000 �. .... _.._ .. . „ ' • q � � � ' • 'T ` } Y • • • • A .. `�� .. {w-. .._ .. 2_-W CITY Ol� ST. PAUL BZLE NO. -!� FZNAL ORDSB , By / U �-(J..t.4 ^� -i — . Fiie i'vo. S95093-S95 9 & S s Voting Trlard. 6 :'� g Ia the tiatter of Sidewa2k reconstruction at the £ollowing 1� ioa(s?: S95093 - on both sides Birmingha� St. fron East Arlington Av . to East *iebraska Ave. / 595094 - on the south side Case Ave. frog Haxelwood St�'' Kenaard St.`Y - p �' �� ;�_'� 595095 - on the nflrth side East Cottage Ave, from G�*' in St. to Kennard 3t. ; 59�096 - on both sides East Magnolia Avee froa Ed,g rton St. to P&yne Ave. � � , -, 595097 - at 1398 Mcafee St� S95098 - on the east side I3okomis Ave. from Maryland-'Ave. ,� , 595102 - on the east side Winchell St. f $, ' Hoyt tive. �? r� � � , *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES t Rose Ave. to East East Nevada Ave, to Ea�st , RESIDENTIAL RATHS (One, two or t ree family structures) Eecon'attruction (replacement of 2d sidewalk) -$7.04 per fsont foot for a fiv-:e (5) foot wide walk and $8 46 per frant foat for a six (6} foot wide wal.k:',Al2 other widths will e prorated according2y. �ee cons[sucifvn (where no walk existed) - 10 % of the actual cost estimated to be approximatelg'$�,.15 per squ re foot. _ � Al1 corner residential �r ertias will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or. reconstru e3 sidewalk along and abutting the "long sird,�" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (Mor than ihree family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reccnstsu ted si�ewalk; i00% of actual eost estimated to be approximately $4.2-5 er square foot. J, q�- under Preliminary order �S — (_(`� � approved 1 �S The Council of the City of Saint Paul has con cted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof/ having been given as prescribed bq the City Charter; and WAEKEAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above–described improvement be m de, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to gro ed with the improvemenC; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the ompletion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate a 1 expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council i accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Blakey Grimm Guerin Harris Megard Rettman Thune Favor Against Adopted by Council: Date ' �-� Coumcil Sgcretary '�_ � i Mayor �. - ,; . :. . . '-,�a � A � � :'� � a� . , ...� - I` • : 'a , ' :� -; ,�, � , � t" L±_,z- ,',� under Preliminary order t� — C,� � appreve �,5 ` � � :�� _ r . �' ,. F' l / � _ � , l� �.S T_he �ouncil of the City of Saint Pau1 has cond"u ed a public hearing upoa the above iraprovement, due ^otice thereof'� aving been given as prescribed by the City Chartera an@ tdHERfiAS, The Council has heard all,'' p rsons, abjections and recomnen@a�ions pertaining to said pro�osed;' i provement and has fully considered the &ame; now, therefore, be it `� l „ RESOLVED, That the Council of the City%o Saint Paul does hereby order that the ahove—described :mprovement be made and the proper City afficers a2a herebq directed and authorized to proc`ee with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVEII, ThaL ugon thz co letion of said improvement, the psoper Gity officers shall calculaCa alI xpenses incurred therain and �hall repnrt the same to the City Couacil i�'a cordance with �hapter 14 of the Citp Charter. r , COUNCILF'EItSONS Yeas Nays Blakey Grimm Guesln Hasri,s Megard t�ettr�an Thune Zn avos % A ainst Adopted by Counc%I: Da Certifr�'d Passvd by Cou cil�5ecr.et.ary Bv ✓ Mayoz \ Yf U SUMMARY OF ENGII�'EERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 6 C �I J - 1 9 s-��y Sc�sde�3 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BIRMINGHAM ST. from E. Arlington Ave. to E. Nebraska Ave. J INITIATING ACTION: This order was iniriated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complainu and an inspecrion of che walk. EXISTIN(' ONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ............................................................................ Scjs�cJt� PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. CASE AVE. from Hazelwood St. to Kennard St. i INITIATING ACTION: T'his order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (l) signer and an inspection of the waik. EXISITNG C�NDITTdNS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settied panels. ............................................................................ S95Q9SPRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCVT SIDEWALK N.S. E. COTTAGEAVE. from Germain St. to Kennard St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXTSTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrere with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, setded and cracked panels. s'�e�t PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDE��ALK B.S. E. MAGNOLIA AVE. from Edgerton St. to Payne Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXTSTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with a�ee heaves, aspha]t patches, disintesrated, scaled and settled panels.. S9�pg7 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT STDE�'VALK E.S. MCAFEE ST. from TopicLane toB. Arlington Ave. at 1398 McAfee St. Only. y INITIATING ACTTON: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. _Z. t . EXISTING CONDTIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, settled andC�s ��y uneven panels. � ........................................................................... � PRO TE T• RECOI�'STRL3CT SIDE�'VALK B.S. NOKOMIS AVE. from E. Rose Ave. to ' 9 � E. Maryland Ave. � INITIATING ACTIOT: This order was inivated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXIS'FING COI�TDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and asphalt patches. -• ... ....................................................................... • SUM�7ARY OF EN(;1��ERTNG RECO?�4?�9E;�'DAT]ONS �� Ward 6 Ave. °� ��,� E.S. WINCHELL ST. from E. Nevada Ave. to - II�'TTTATING ACT30N: This order was initiated by the Director of Pubiic Works as public necessity on the basis of one (i) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspectton of the walk. BXI TTNC; CONDITIO�'S: This walk is poured concrete wich a�ee heaves, water pockets, disintegrated and settled panels. ............................................................................ Public Hearin Date — Au ust 2 1995 RE 5-26-95 3i589 OEPARTMENTIOGFICEICAUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. Public Works Sidewalks 5-9-95 INITIAUDATE INITIAL/DATE CANTACT PERSON & PF{ONE � DEPARTMENT DIRECTOq � CITY CAUNqL Q�T ThomasP.Kesfe-266-612t �`�GN �CITYAROflNEY �CITVCLERK NUAIBFR FOR M115T8EONWUNCiLAGEtiDABY��Al� 6-14-95 ROU7ING Og�p�E7DIflECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIF. Must be in Council Research Office �� MAYDR(OflASSISTANn 70 Counal Research no later than noon Frida 6-2-95 � TOTALxOFSIGNqTUpEPAGE3 1 _ (CLIPALLLOCATIONSWRSIGNATURE} �ASSOCIA7E DEPAfliMENTALACCOUMANT AC710N ftEQUESTED � �� Reconstsuct SidewaNc in Ward 6(See attached list) File No. S95093-98, 595102 REWniMENOa7roNS: Appmve {y a Rejeu (a) PERSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER TNE FOLL0IM1�NG QUESTIONS; _PLANNING COMMISSKKJ _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� H � m� �ES n �� NO er worked under a con[ract fo� mis departrnent? _qe COMMt7TEE _ 2. Has ih�s �ES � NO er been a ciry employee? A SrpFf 3. Does ihis persoNfirm possess a skill not normally possessetl by any current city — — employee? DtsTRtc7cAUNC�L — 2 YES NO SUPPOBTS WHICH COUNpL OBJECTNE? ExP�ain all yes answers on separate sheet and attaeh to gteen sheet Neighborhoods Ward 6 INRIATINO PP09LEM. ISSUE, OPPORTUNIN (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WFiERE. WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freefthaw cycles, sesvice lite limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condiiion would warsen to a state where it would be reridered unusabta and subject to i�reased pedestrian in}uries from tal{s and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPpOVED: The community xnll benefit from this project because it will provide sale detecl free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sec[or jobs are created as a resuk of this activiry. DISADVANTpGES IF APPROVED: Historicaliy, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area ot construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stil{ remains cornmversial. DISpDVANiAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doAar amounts in eventual cepairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. SS��s� , .v,� aTa"--}� A°,,;�k'U`Y "' :?y 7 <'� rt � :�::^9i f`ir i�va�'a TOTALAMOUPlTOFTAANSACTIONS �]�EO�.00 COST/REVENUEHUDGETED-(CIRCLEONE) YE$ No FUNDMGSOURCE 95-�M�o664 A, PPA 95 = 575 .��0 pCITVITYNUM6ER C95 T2j�2�'0�84^2�� FttJANC1AL MFORMATION: tEXPLAIM B, AS T = 4 � 6 r OOO � C, CPB 95 = 50,000 ORIGINAL Cl2Y OF ST. PAUL PBEI.IIiINAEY OEDBE /9 q s-�y CO NCIL FILE N0. � r By� vLC_ . Pil No. S95093 595098 fi 595102 Voting Ward 6 __ �JS�G� / In the Hatter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s): S95093 - on both sides Birmingham St, from East Arlington Ave. to East Nebraska Ave. 595044 - on the south side Case Ave. from Hazelwood St. to Kennard St. 595095 - on the north side East Cottage Ave. from Germain St. to Kennard St. 595096 - on both sides East Magnolia Ave. from Edgerton St. to Payne Ave. 595097 - at 1398 Mcafee St. S95098 - on the east side Nokomis Ave. from East Rose Ave. to East Maryland Ave. 595102 - on the ease side Winchell St. from East Nevada Ave. to East Hoyt Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Heconsttnction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$�.04 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. AL1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev consCrnction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.15 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTZ-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconseructed sidewalk; 100Y of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.25 per square foot. ��'�a/ The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the a6ove improvement, and having considered said report, herebp resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby apptoved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1995 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 2nd day of August, 1995 , at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Aouse Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing� the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas� Nays ✓ Blakey G imm �erin FjZrris �/hye ard t/ ttman Thune �� c.p Zn Favor � Against � flbSC r Adopted by Gouncil: Date rj � Certified Passed by Counci Secretary BY P�n—� � - � Mayor �� p1TY 0�1�� s ✓' .,w, � 4 1 . � C � � i=:=_=_ ==`=7 � v , ise' =ei:9 a i� ♦ M1G J � " Ili.� �854 � Saint Paul City Public Hearing Public Improvement OWNER OR TAXPAYER Council � ( Notice Construction S -�u I COUNCIL DIST #6 PLANNING COUNCIL �02 FILE � S95fl�3 PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION r �9 3 " ��'� ti:s..... �. ; �c��i n, < ��a "';�`si ? - 'u� �- � �� THE TIME: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1995 AT 3:30 P.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall-Court House HEARiNG Written or oraf staiements by any owner wiif be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approval of the proposed project as follows: Reconstrvction of sidewalk on both sides BIRMINGHAM STF2EET from East Arlington Avenue to East Nebraska Avenue. If the City Council approves the project, all or part of the cost wili be assessed against the benetitted properties. Tfie ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is g THIS AMOUNT WILL NOT NEED TO BE PAID ALL AT ONE TiME! Please see PAYMENT INFORMA710N on the reverse side of this notice and also the enclosure for additional project information. CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTiFICATION DATE: o7/�a/s5 � I S��V v � { ESTIMATED RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) - R3e`eoiis�ru?c:�icn (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot : :....:_:.:;.;.;�,.> :..:.::..:. .. for"�a��five (5� foot wide sidewalk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide sidewalk. All other widths will be prorated accordin 1 3ie�� `cti3xst�uc�.i,a.iY where no walk existed - 100% of g Y • .� � ) the actual cost"�estimated'"`to��be approximately $3.15 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the ;Iorir�;'s:=3e of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures) and NONRESI- DENTIAL RATES - For new and reconstructed sidewalk: 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.15 per square foot. PLEASE NOTE: Reconstruction will be at the existing width. Public Works will reconstruct some existing sidewalk that is 6£eet wide down to 5 feet wide in all cases where this is practical. This smaller width (5 feet) is to keep the assessment at the lowest rate. If your walk is 6£eet wide and you and your neiqhbors prePer that width and are willing to accept the higher assessment rate, please contact the Sidewalk Division at to request your preference. AI3� ne�4 SxdeW�lks vtzl�., �e �onst�uated : fi ��8t .. . .,. ,.. , ...... .. ...... . ........ . .... . ��:��:i: Sidewalk reconstruction may consist of replacing from one panel to all of the panels in front of your property. The ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION on your notice shows the number of Peet to be replaced. For questions regarding the construction andjor reconstruction of your sidewalk, please call 266-6120. 9 S' GiTY Q _ ti F 1J � ,�'t' S �i, � q l.��';� i'. :p 2 . � � � �ii==§:�=;sfl : Gia ''E== '_':; If a .� m �� r�� o 'J;� sasa _� Saint Paul City Council � Public Hearing Notice ��,� Public Improvement Construction �[ - OWNER OR TAXPAYER COUNCIL DIST-RICT #6 PLANNING COUNCIL #02 FILE # S9bi194 PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION ��'., !J > �^�°�?°�.3Ei�5 L�Sa�� ,' �C� JUL � � �`� THE TIME: WEpNESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1995 AT 3:30 P.M. PUBUC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall-Court House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner wiil be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ES7IMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approva! of the proposed project as foilows: Reconstruction of sidewalk on the south side CASE AVENUE from Hazelwood Street to Kennard Street. If the City Councif approves the project, all or part ot the cost will be assessed against the benefitted properties. The ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is $ TH{S AMOUNT W1LL NOf NEED TO BE PAID ALl Af ONE T{ME! Please see PAYMENT INFORMATION on the reverse side of this noiice and aiso the enclosure for additionai project information. CON7INUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE: 07/14/95 �� TY o �� F = F A�` � �5S f i � o r? Z � } �:;�= W ��-_: _!€'-_[ > ; m ti c t .�, , �� ??� �asa Saint Faul City Council Public Hearing Notice Public Improvement Construction OWNER OR TAXPAYER � �� s-�� y COUNCIL DISTRICT #6 PLANNING COUNCIL #02 FILE # 595495 PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION ;�- � �� ,� � p +�a� ,l�'L �_ � _ THE TIME: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1995 AT 3:30 P.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City HalhCourt House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner will be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approval of the proposed project as follows: Reconstruction of sidewalk on the north side EAST COTTAGE AVENUE from Germain Street to Kennard Street. if the City Council approves the project, all or part of the cost will be assessed against the benefitted properties. The ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is � THIS AMOUNT WILL NOT NEED TO BE PAID ALL AT ONE TIME! Please see PAYMEN7 INFORMATION on the reverse side of this notice and also the enclosure for additional project information. CONTiNUED ON REVERSE S1DE NOTIFICATION DATE: 07/14J95 qC'�GITY �� ° L �. s � � •l � o � ` � _�,=:.�, `=�E'':=�tt, >"` ;� �� ,, �. `:�,. �sz, Saint Paul City Council ��c Public Hearing Notice � Public Improvement Construction p'S��'� OWNER OR TAXPAYER �� . � ^. r J � `�`�J� lU � � - COUNCIL DISTRICT #6 PLANNING COi9NCIL �05 FILE # S95t796 PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION THE TIME: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1995 AT 3:30 P.M. PUBLtC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall-Court House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner will be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ESTlMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMA710N ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approval of the proposed project as fol{ows: Reconstruction of sidewalk on both sides EAST MAGNOLIA AVENUE �rom Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue. If the City Council approves the project, all or part of the cost will be assessed against the benefitted properties. The ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is $ TFiIS AMOUNT WILL NOT NEED TO BE PAID ALL Al' ONE TIME! Please see PAYMENT INFORMATION on the reverse side of this notice and also the enciosure for additional project information. CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFlGAT10N DATE: o7/ia/g5 �' � 1 T y �FIL� : R'�£ Pi '. � k {��? x o ,� e IFI_=`=;"�[I i r � � �. �S �J;� �859 Saint Paul City Council �� `� Public Hearing Notice pI 5--�'�ly Public Improvement Construction OWNER OR TAXPAYER PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION COUNCIL DISTRICT #6 PLANNING COUNCIL #02 FILE # 5954�? PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID � � .��'� �,��$�� JU� � �� i�^5 THE TIME: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1995 AT 3:30 P.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Fioor City Hall-Court House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner will be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approval of the proposed project as follows: Reconstruction of sidewaik at 1378 MCAFEE STREET. If the City Council approves the project, all or part of the cost will be assessed against the benefitted properties. The ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is $ THIS AMOUNT WILL NOT NEED TO BE PAID ALL AT ONE TIME! Piease see PAYMENT INFORMATION on the reverse side of this notice and aiso the enclosure for additional project information. CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE: 07/�a/s5 Saint Paul City Council � �''``��"� Public Hearing Notice 5 ��'� Public Improvement Construction � OWNER OR TAXPAYER COUNCIL DISTRICT �6 PLANNING COUNCIL k02 FILE � 595098' ` PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION � �.`.,��Y R�°=��t � � � � i99� JU� THE TIME: WEDESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1995 AT 1995 PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Fioor City Hall-Court House HEARING Written or oraf statements by any owner wiH be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE To consider approval of the proposed project as follows: Recanstruction of sidewalk on the east side NOKOMIS AVENUE trom East Rose Avenue to East Maryiand Avenue. **'**LONG SIDE - NO ASSESSMENT**** THIS NOFICE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY! THERE ARE NO ASSESSMEN7S AGAINST THIS PROPERTY. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL 266-8850. NOTICE SENT BY THE REAL ESTATE DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES ROOM 14U C1TY HALL-COUkT HOUSE SAINT PAUL, MN 55102 NOTIFICATION DATE: o�/ia/s5 = 4' CITY = �'� ��'.�'i : � ^. � ,', x ° � � a - li� �-__ : � �__= €::= tt� � � �r< 1� p l� �859 A Saint Paul City Public Hearing Public Improvement OWNER QR TAXPAYER Council � Notice �� Construction �S-� COUNCIL DISTRICT #6 PLANNING COUNCIL k02 FILE # 595102 PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION Jf, M � JU� 1 � 1995 THE TIME: WEpNESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1995 AT 3:30 P.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hali-Court House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner wiU be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ES7IMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approval of the proposed project as follows: Reconstruction of sidewalk on the east side WfNCHELL STREET From East Nevada Avenue to East Hoyt Aven�e. If the City Council approves the project, all or part of the cost will be assessed against the benefitted properties. The ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is $ THIS AMOUNT WILL NOT NEED TO BE PAID AlL AT ONE TIMEI Please see PAYMENT INFORMATION on the reverse side of this notice and also the enclosure for additional project information. CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE: o7/ia/95