95-644, ' �at
CITY OF Si. PAIIL
FIHAL OfiDEg
i"
ORIGINAL
J� ;
Green-.�eet 9634340
COIINCI�ILP NO �J �
B t`rr �'i /�/�a'�i�'
File No. 595036
Voting Ward 3
In the liatter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
at 1737 Lincoln Avenue.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRIICTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Becoastrnction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev constrnetion
(where no walk eaisted) - 100Y of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.15 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTZ-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.25 per square foot.
under Preliminary order � S ^� Q j approved �l q, ,� S
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing
upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as
prescribed by the City Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Conncil has heard all persons, objections and
recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully
considered the same; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order
that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers
are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the
proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall
report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City
Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
B�.ak ey
+�yimm
✓G�erin
✓fIarris
M�gard
✓R���man
vThune
Adopted by Council: Date �{S
��ose v.�
Certified Passed by Counci Secretary
{ Favor
✓ QAgainst
� �bS�w�
'I�I�.. � ��+,
I�
.
�
Public Hearing Date - June 14, 1995 RE 4-7-95 � 3�3��
DEPARTMENIIOFFICEWUNCLL oA�wRw-�o GREEN SHEET NO.
Public Works Sidewalks 3-2&95 iNmnuoA MRUUOAr�
coNrncr�asoNanwNe �o�aannFxroiaECroa ❑cmcourccn.
ThomasP.Keefe-266-6121 ��� �cma�rroaNer �CIIYCLEFiK
MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY�DA7� 4 �T�� �BUDGEfDIFECTOq �FIN.LMGT.SERVICESDIR.
Must be in Council Research Office °�D� wnoaroaass�srar.m t� Counal Research
no later than noon Frida 4-14-95 ❑
TOTALiOF91GNATUNEP�GE3 j _ (CIJPALLLOGA7qN5FOR9GNJ1NNq �ASSOCNiE � AIACCWNTAN!
ACTION IiEIX1E5TED � ' ��
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward�(See attached list)
File No. 595036
pECOMMENDATIONS: Appmle (!q a Reject (R) PEHSONAL SERVICE CONTHACTS MUST ANSWER tHE FOLLOWING OUES710N5:
PLANNING CdAMISS10N _CNIL SEflVICE COMMISSION i. HaS ihi5 pefSOn/fllffi evBf Nrofked uMef a COntr3Ct fOr UIiS dEpeftrnent?
'CIBCOMMITTEE VES NO
— 2 Has tliis perSOMirm ever been a edy employee?
A STAFF _ YES NO
^ DISTRICT WUNCIL — I�F s. Does this person/firm possess a skill not norma�ty possessed by any curcent ary
— — empioyee?
SUPPOR75NMICHCWNCILOBJECTNET YES NO
Explain all yas anawen on se{+ente shM and anach to green shwt
Neighborhoods Ward 3
VWTIA7ING PROBLEM, iSSUE, OPPOANhIN �WrtO. WriAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): �
The probiem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, delaterious subgrade matarial, akernating free/thaw cycles,
service I'rfe limits, chemical add8ives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annua( basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigffiions.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPFOVED:
The communiry will benefit from this project because B will provide sate detect free sidewalks fior its marry citize�ns. sidewatk
contrads are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs ar �;as�a.r�sEHeb� titisaac��vity.
;€�., .�. _
�� � � ����
p=�
_ =-�_ . .
�.,..:.,�.....�_...�._.._..�__-_' -
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: -
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simpiy stated, psoperty owners dete�t assassments, aad despite the fad up to one-half the assessment is City s�bsidized, if still
remains coniroversial.
D�.SADVANTAGES 4F NOT APPROVED:
This option would ailow the infrastructure of sidewaik stodc to deteriorate, which in turn, wiil generate more personal injury suits,
uftimately resulting in the expenditura of larger doilar amounts in eventual repairs and/or repiacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTALAMWNTOFTRANSACTpNt �F�S.00 COST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) � NO
FUNDINGSWRCE 95-M-0664 A. P!A 95 = 515,000 ACIiY1SYNUMBER �95-27727-�784-27oto
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (E%PLAIN) B� AST -� � 6� OOO
C. CIB 95 = 50,000
�s��
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERlNG RECOMMENDAT19NS
Wardlr 3
�c�So36 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. LINCOLN AVE. from Amherst St.
fo S. Wheeler St. at 1737 Lincoln Ave. Oniy.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and
an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches and
settled panels.
............................................................................................
qG�'�iTY OP
�,�.�� ;�
c �. x :
o — a
' t1671��tt111 9
y it►tt �it II �
J m �
�l
l � �85�
Saint Paul City
Public Hearing
Public Improvement
OWNER OR TAXPAYER
Council � 9s_ ��
Notice
Construction
COUNCIL DISTRICT #3
PLANNING COUNCIL q14
FILE # €535�35'- . i `..
PROPERTY ADDRESS
_.. _ __.._
PARCHL ID
PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION
��:�.�_.::f �'.�;�»...'�;; �mi?i�r
`ai k' :o !:J°.+�
THE TIME: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1995 AT 3:30 P.M.
PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall-Court House
HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner will be considered by
the Council at this hearing.
PURPOSE
ESTIMATED
ASSESSMENT
INFORMATION
ESTiMATEC
ASSESSMENT
CALCULATION
To consider approval of the proposed project as follows:
Reconstruction of sidewalk at 1737 LINCOLN AVENUE.
If the City Council approves the project, all or part of the
cost wiil be assessed against the benefitted properties. The
ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is $:
THIS AMOUNT WILL NOT NEED TO BE PAID ALL AT ONE TIME!
Please see PAYMENT INFORMATION on the reverse side of this
notice and also the enciosure for additional project information.
CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE: 05/26/95
qs_���
ESTI?J-ATED RATES
RESZDErTIAL RATES (One, two cr three £a;,iily stzuctures) -
Recoastru�txoa (replace;,�ent of old sideralk) -$7.04 per frcnt foot
�Por a five""'�5� foct wide side�alk and 8.46
() $ per front foot for a
six (6) foot wide sidewalk. Ali other widths will be prorated
accordingly. 2:e_w ;co3stiuetian (where no �,alk existed) - 100% of
,.,. :. .: :
the zctual cost"'esti-�ated`"to be approxirately $3.15 per square
£oot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the
first 150 £eet of t�ew or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting
the lo�g:�;;sAids of the property.
Y.ULTZ-RESIDENTIAL (Ncre than three fzmily structures) znd NoNRESI-
DENTIAL RATES - For r.ew and reconstructed sidewalk: 100% of the
actual cost estinated to be approxirately ;4.25 per square foot.
PLEASE NoTE: Reconstruction aill be at the existing width. Public
Works uill reconstruct so;,,e existinq side»alk that is 6 feet wide
down to 5£eet wide ia all cases where this is practical. This
smaller width (5 £eet) is to keep the assessr,�ent at the lowest
rate. Z£ your ualk is 6 feet wide and you and your neighbcrs
prefer that width and are willing to accept the higher assessnent
rate, please contact the Side•.:alk Division at 266-6120 to request
. .... ......... .. .........
your pseference. A13 `new .'side�.aikspvzil-�b'e��,�zoastructed SyPeef°
> .. .:.: : <: , . . . : .: : : . . ::. : : : .. .
,....._:... _ ...........:..::::....�:..:...:.:::::::::: :..:......:...::._..:.:::.::,:,._�.....:,.. > ..:� ::.:;,.:..::.. ,:..�.
wide.
Sidewalk reconstruct_on ;.�ay ce;.sist of replacing £rom or,e panel to
all of the panels in £ront o£ your property. The £STIY.ATED
ASSESS*:ENT CALCULATZCN on your notice shows the numbeY of feet to
be replaced. Per c•aestions regarding the construction and/or
reconstruction o£ yo::r side»alk, please call 266-6120.
QR1G1�'�L /4 �[
CISY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCIL FI E N0. q s-67�
PBBLIIiZAABY ORDEE By���l ��2�
File No. S9�
Voting Ward 3 --���
In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
at 1737 Lincoln Avenue.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstrnction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev constrnction
(where no walk existed) - 1007 of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.15 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feeC of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.25 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby
resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE
for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and
1995 Public Improvement Aid.
2
3.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 14th_ day
of June, 1995,, at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of
the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in
the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of
hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof
as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas/ Nays
✓` Blakey
✓jGrimm
i/�uerin
� arris
Pf'egard
✓ ettman
�Thune
Adopted by Council: Date � i� .1 l l�
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
� In Eavor By
' �
� Against
ayor