The URL can be used to link to this page

95-567_ ° X '�.e., - CIiY OF ST. PAIIL FIHAL OEDBH QRiG�f�AL 7� , � COU�NC �FILE i _j �- �� / B y `�� '�� ,_„^ � Fil No. ,, 5950 3 r �' -"'v Voting �a�rd 1�� In the �Satter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s): on the east side North Victoria Street from Summit Avenue to Portland Avenue and the south side Portland Avenue from Nor[h Victoria Street to approximately 100 feet east of North Victoria Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRIICTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Beconstrnetion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front fooC for a sis (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev coastrnction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.15 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100Y of actual eost estimated to be approximately $4.25 per square foot. under Preliminary order �S ��--� � approved j��S 1��5 The Couneil of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due noYice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard alI persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Couneil of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FIIRTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the pioper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the Citq Charter. COIINCILPERSONS Yeas� Nays ✓ �8lakey ✓�rimm �uerin Ij,arris �/ gard �ttman Thune [� Adopted by Council: Date M t^� �Sev�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor � Against � IyY�S�v� �� '� ��-� -� �. _ I� , /��'-�� _ � Public Hearing Date — May 24, 1995 RE 3-17-95 9�� DEPARTAENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINITIAiED GREEN SHEET �NO.31566 Public Works Sidewalks 3-10-95 iNmAwp� RIAUDATE COMACTPERSON#PHONE �pEppq7MENTDIfiECTOfl �CftYCOUNCI `� Thomas P. Keefe - 266-6121 ^�N crrv arrowuEr ❑ crtv c�aic MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABV(DAlE7 4-5-95 �n�'� gBUOGETDIfiECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIp. Must be in Council Researc6 Office Q�� ypyOfi(OflASSISTANi) � Counal Research no later than noon Frida 3-24-95 ❑ T0T1LL i OF 8Ni1MTURE PMiEB 1 _(C(1P ALL LOCA710N8 iON 9GW1NRk� � ASSOCIA7E � DEPA ENTAL ACCWNTANT ACTION FEIXIES7ED �,� } � � / Reconstruc[ Sidawa& in Ward t(See adtached list) File No. 595033 RECOMMENDATqNS: /ppae (A� w flejea (i� pEpgpNAL SEHVICE CAMflACTS IIIUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING W ESTIONS: PLANNING COMMISSION _CNILSERVICE COMMISSKKI 1. H2S IIItS p@lsOMlrttl ¢VEf WOlk2d Uf1dBt 2 COf1h3C[ fOf th15 dEP2MIMt? GacoMM�TiEE YES NO — — 2. Has this person/firtn ever 6een a dry employee? A S7nFF _ YES NO DISTaICTCOUNCIL 8 3. Doas thi5 {lef5o�fm possess a skill not nofmally poSSeSSBd by any CurceM ciTy — — employee? SUPPOqTSWHICHCOUNCIL08.lECTNE4 YES NO Explain all yes anawers on sepante sheat and attaeh to green she� Neighborhoods Ward 1 INITIAiING PqOBLEM, ISSUE. OPPOFTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHEflE. WFf�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating freetthaw cycles, service i'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These pro6lems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where B would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and poss��TiHgati�ns. � . ..:. :J�CD NAR 1 p 1 � 1 ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The communily will benefit from this project because k will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so ft follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. �. ._ . . ,, .-�� .i'w_....:t _ a.e.......:a5i A'v'faii�� :i.:"--„� i 6 1�95 DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: �� Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would albw the infrastruc[ure of sidewalk stodc to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resuking in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventuai repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNTOFTRAI�SACTIONS 2 G31.00 WST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES NO FUNDMGSOUpCE g5-M-0564 A, PtA 95 � 575,000 ACITVITYNUMBER C�5-2T7 27-0784-27010 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B, AST = 416 � QOO c, cte 95 = 5a,000 9�=�s6�_ Sl1MMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ward 1 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N.VICTORIA ST. from Summit Ave. to Portland Ave. & S.S. PORTLAND AVE. from N. Victoria St. E. 100'. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on the basis of a petition with one (i ) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with disintegrated, scaled and cracked paneis. ............................................................................................. � � IrY °p � Ra �! . � � � o — a � u[flHillill , � �IfF EII II� � �m h �� !86♦ � Saint Paul City Public Hearing Public Improvement OWNER OR TAXPAYER Council � `��7 Notice Construction COUNCIL DISTRIC'f �1 PLANNING COUNCIL #O8 _ FILE # S95t333>-:='.'- PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION �.�s rr„��;�`µt., `�',.-;�� .,u ' �44��w n 5 R �' — ;� v' ttf: ` �� THE TIME: WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1995 AT 3:30 P:Ak J PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall-Court House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner will be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ESTiMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approval of the proposed project as follows: Reconstrvction of sidewalk on the east side NORTH VICTORIA STREET from Summit Avenue to Portland Avenue and the south side PORTLAND AVENUE from North Yictoria Street to approximatelY '•00 feet east of North Victaria Street. If the City Councif approves the project, all or part of the cost will be assessed against the benefitted properties. The ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is $ Tf-IIS AMOUNT WILL NOT tSEED TO BE PAfD ALL AT ONE TiME! Please see PAYMENT INFORMATION on the reverse side of this notice and aiso the enciosure for additional project information. CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE: 05/05/95 qs-s�� ESTIMATED RATES RESIDENTIAL RATE3 (One, two or three family structures) - Recori��i�uc�:ioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot ;��:.:><._ for"'a�"five (5) foot wide sidewalk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide sidewalk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. li��[":co�st�ctiori (where no walk existed) - 100% of >.: , .... �..... ,:: �..,.:.,._,... the actual cost estiinated'"�'to be approximately $3.15 per square Poot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the 7:cng;�3Yd;e of the property. MBLTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures) and NONRESI- DENTIAL RATES - For new and reconstructed sidewalk: 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.25 per square foot. PLEASE NOTE: Reconstruction will be at the existing width. Public works will reconstruct some existing sidewalk that is 6 feet wide down to 5 feet wide in all cases where this is practical. This smaller width (5 feet) is to keep the assessment at the lowest rate. If your walk is 6 feet wide and you and your neighbors prefer that width and are willing to accept the higher assessment rate, please contact the Sidewalk Division at 266-6120 to request . ...:.. .....:.:......<,., .:. ...,,,::.......:..:.,.:;..,..�.,. ..:..... ..:....:..,.,:_:-::.... . .. ..:....... ...._..,:,:.. .:.::... .. .... your preference. AII;_�::rievt<;.:_s_i3ewa3k§- �t�3'1.::3�e:_';coastxt�ct:ed":i_ 5t �f�et .. ,..,_ - ........:....•,.::....... ::.:..... ....:.._.:..;.,.. >..... . . , ...: : ......... ......,.... . .........,.:.::;:: ..:,..::,> ,:.......::.:; ::..,:.. ..:::..» . wid�: ,..:.. ..:..>:. ...:.>:..:...;:::<:.>,:, Sidewalk reconstruction may consist of replacing Prom one panel to all of the panels in front of your property. The ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION on your notice shows the number of feet to be replaced. For questions regarding the construction and/or reconstruction of your sidewalk, please call 266-6120. CITY OF ST. PAIIL PRELIMIHAgY OHDEB ORIG�f�AL ��' 95- 5b� � .q , COUNCZL FILE N . ��.7�'�'OG� B y � !i File o. 950 Vot ng W d 1 In the Hatter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s): on the east side North Victoria Street from Summit Avenue to Portland Avenue and the south side Portland Avenue from North Victoria Street to approximately 100 feet east of North Victoria Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRIICTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstrnction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev constrnction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.15 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.25 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVS for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1995 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th day of Map, 1995 , at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That noCice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Gharter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas� Nays ✓BJ,.akey i�J.3 IrtIIl i /G` erin rris M� gard �/Rettman �hune * � In Favor �Against Adopted by Council: Date��g� CertifiedPassedby Council Secretary By R" - Mayor DEPARTMENT�OFFICFJCOUNGL DATE INITIATED PublicWorksSidewalks s-,o-ss GREEN SHEET No. �1566 INITIAUDATE � RIAUDATE CONTACTPERSONEPHONE pEppq7MENTDIRECTOR �Cf1YCOl1NCl � �� Thomas P_, Keefe - 266-6121 �N cm arroaNEr � CI7V CLERK NUNBFA FOR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABV(DATE� 4-5-9S �� BUDGETDIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Council Researcb Office � MAYOR(ORASSISTANn � Coundl Research no later than noon Frida 3-24-95 ❑ 707ALlOFSIGNANREPAGES 1 _ (Gl1PALLLOCA710N3iOR31GiL�TURE� �ASSOCIA7E �DEPA ENTALACCOUNTANT ACTION FC-0UESTED �' .� } � � � Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 7(See attachad list) File No. 595033 PECOMMENDATDNS: Appm�e (!q or RejsA (R) pEHSONAI SERVICE CONtRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PUINNING COMMISS�F! _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSIOM t, Hy5 piis personlfirtn eve� work� under a mntrac[ for rhis departrrten[? YES NO q6 COMMfTTEE — — 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a dry employee? N STAFF _ YES NO OISTRtc7CWWClt $ 3. Ooes this personlfirtn possess a skill rrot normaliy possessed by any current ary — — employee? SUPPoRTSWHICHCOUNCILOBJECTNET YES NO Esplain alI yas answen on separate sheat and attaeh to green shaet Neighborhoods Ward 1 iNITIATING PPOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORIUNfiY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem "defec[ive sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, akernating freetthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a c'itywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition xrould worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and poss�4SEtigsti�n c <.. ,.:: / MAR t � tg95 J ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The communiry will benefit from this projed because it will provide safe deted free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it foibws that private sedor jobs are created as a resuR of this activity. �,:_ .__ � ... _ ....�_F ;,.. ... _ � i�� DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVm: � � Historicaliy, the sidewalk reconsiructions have creffied negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPFOVED: This option would ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimateiy resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTIONS 2.fi31.O0 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDMGSOUHCE 95-�1-0564 P., PIA 95 = 515 ,��0 pCRVRYNUMBEB ��S-ZT]27-0]3tF FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPIAIN) a. AST =�i � C� QOO C. CIB 95 = 50,000