The URL can be used to link to this page

95-135..- � , � CITY OF ST. PAIIL FIAAL OBDSB ORIGINq�. FIL$ N0. By , .,si✓l.�- File No. ! S 'yo�ing W�rd_ In the Ha�tea of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s): at 18 Summit Court. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES 3� RESIDENTZAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Beconstrnct!ion (replacement of old sidewalk) —$6.84 per fronU fooS for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.22 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev consirncEion (where no walk existed) — 100% of �he actual cost estimated to be approximaGely $3.10 per square foot. All cotner residen�ial properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstruc�ed sidewalk along and abu�ting the "long side" of the property. MULTI—RESIDENTIAL (More than three #amily structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.15 per square foot. under Preliminary Order q� � � � � � apptoved � r't-� � `� � � - � � �� The Council of �he City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon &he above improvement, due no�ice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charher; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining 'to said proposed improvement and has fully considered �he same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the Ci�y of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above—described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, Tha� upon fhe completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey ��C t� i mm �j uerin arris egard Ret�man �hune � In Favor Q Against Adopted by Council: Date �_`) )� � � Certi E�'i Passedby Council Secretary ayor Public Hearing bate — February 8, 1995 RE 12-2-94 Q S-13 � , DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/CIX1NCk DATE�NRWTED GREEN SHEET NO Public Works Sidewalks 11-21-94 �rzuwATE x�iTiamA� CONTPGTPEpSON&PHONE DEPARTMINTDIfiECTOH �CiTYCOUNCH. Thomas P. Keefe - 266-6121 A� � �RY ATTOFiNEV � cmr a erix MusTe�«+cour�ci�a�eroae�'ca�T� 12-21-9 �� BUDC�TDIfiECTOH ❑FIN.&MGT.SEqVICESDIR AG Must be in Council Research ffice � MAY � R �� T �� a�� no later than noon Frida 12-9-94 ❑ TOTALxOFSPGNANAEPAGB I ^ (CtiPALLLOCAT70NSFORSIC,MATpNA �ASSOCIATE �OEP INTALACODUNTANT ��N�o�� 0�� d Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 2(See attached list) ,, C.� `I�f Os RECOMMENDA7pNS: AppaalA) u Rejat (Fp PERSONAL SERVICE CONTMCTS NU3T ANSWEP TNE FOLLOWING WESTIONS: PLANNINGCOMMISSqN _CIVR SERVICE COMMISSqN �. �{ ihis perso�rtn everwaked under a contract for this deparbne�i? q8 COMMI77EE � � — — 2. Has this peraoNfirtn ever bean a dry empbyee? A siAFF — YES NO DISTfi�TCIX1NCIL �� 3. Does ihis persoNfirm possess a skill rat narmally possessed by any curcent ciry — empbyee? SUPPOiiTSWHICHCIXINCILOBJECTIVE? YES NO 9 � Explain a11 yes anawers on separete aheet a�d attach to grean sheet W I�y¢Q 2./ INITIATING PPOBLEM. ISSUE.OPPORTUNITV (WHO. WHAT. WHEN. WHERE. WHh: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freetthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variatans, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPqOVED: The community will benefit from this project hecause it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contradors, so ft follows that private sector jobs are creat as a of th' ivft�y. +�J�'�7a?:>�1 5?�t !v� a%e.F,o � � �a�JY DISADVANTAGES IF APPfiOVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstruc[ions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fad up to one-haif the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastrudure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury su'rts, uftimate(y resumng in the expenditure of larger doltar amounts in eventuaf repairs and/or reptacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSAC710NS ] COSTIREVENUEBUDGETED(GHCLEONE� YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 4Et'�^p�.3 A Pt'A 9�f � 4 g5 a 00 � pCRVITYNUMBER �9�#e�2T]Z�<^D7fS�F-27009 FINANqAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) � � AST � 400 �OOQ C, CPB g4 = 50,0�0 5�� WAIVER OF NOTIF1GATlON The undersigned, owner or agent thereof in fee of property, (egal described partially as follows: LOT 10, SUMMIT COURT 9s-i�s states that it was entit(ed to receive notification under Chapter 13 of the Saint Paui City Charter prior to the construction for a pubiic improvement. Said 'improvement to be reconstruction of the sidewalk in front of 18 SUMMIT COURT. Nothwithstanding failure to receive such notice and concurring in the action by the Council, the undersigned does hereby waive said notification requirements for the public improvement to be approved by the Council of the City of Saint Paul. The undersigned does hereby agree to pay the assessments for the benefits received from said improvement. �, \ i , t� BY : .,\ � �� _�_ �+_� David �Liily Date: T ��'/ � �� {Waiver) �llMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATlON Ward 2 9S - 13S PROJECT: RECOh(S7RUCT SIDEWALK E.S. SUMMIT CT. from Summit Ave. fo Grand Hill at 18 Summit Ct. Onfy. tt3f7fATIhIG AGTtON: This order was initiated from property owner request. EXfSTlHG CQNDITtOIVS: Reconstruct 4.7' wide special scored concrete waik. Siy�o� PO/� ............................................................ CITY OF ST. PAIIL PgELIHINA$Y OBDSR ORIGINAL Zn Ehe Ma88er of Sidewalk reconstruc�ion at the £ollowing location(s): at 18 Summit Cour�. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two oz thzee family structures) Reconsgruc&ion (replacement of old sidewalk) —$6.84 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.22 per front foot for a six {6) £oo� wide walk. A11 ohher widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. Hev cons�rnc�3on (where no walk exzsted) — 100Y of the actual cos� estimated to be approximate2y $3.10 per square foot. All corner residential proper�ies will receive a credit up �o the firs� �50 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abu�t3ng �he "long side" of the ptoperty. MULTI—RESIDENTIAL than Ghree family sGrucLures), NON—RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cosL estimated to'be approximakely $4.15 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of Ghe Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. Tha� the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and Gha� the esEimated cost Chereof is *SEE ABOVE for es�imated construction rates, financed by assessmen�s and J994 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the Sth day of February, 1995 , at 3:30 o�clock P..M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said the manner provided hearing, the nature as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas /' Nays �/B�Yakey y /G , � imm ,/G erzn �rris gard ttman Thune public heazing be given to the persons and in by the Charter, stating the time and place of of the improvemen� and the total cost thereof �In Favor QAgainst �s_135� �� NQ ile'No.�S941 oting W d 2 Adop�ed by Counc3l: Da�e �� 9 Certified Passad by Council Secretar� By� �-._ a. F �iys � c ayo �'GliY OF F�` s Saitnt �'aul C�ity � �� ,� - � � II�E�� ublic �eaz�itng ±� �� Publi�c Inapxoveznent J ��`Rj�, �85• � OWNER OR TAXPAYER Council (/�� NOt10E Construction g s_�3s COUNCIL DISTRICT #2 PLANNING COUNCIL #16 FILE ri 59410� PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL ID PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION ��:;,� i �,,, i:<:;aii:�l cdhilV � u Ev�� .. : -,.;.. � THE TIME: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1995 AT 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City HaII-Court House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner wiil be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE ES7tMATED ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT CALCULATION To consider approval of the proposed project as follows: RECONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWA�K AT 18 SUMMIT COURT. If the Cify Council approves the project, a(I or part of the cost wili be assessed against the benefitted properties. The ESTIMATED assessment for the above property is $ THIS AMOUNT WILL NOT NEED TO BE PAID ALL AT ONE TIME! Please see PAYMENT INFORMATION on the reverse side of this notice and also the enclosure for additional project information. � CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE: Ov2o/s5