D00122.
�
Approved Copies to:
— City Clerk (Original)
— Rnance DepYs Accounting Division
— Requesting Dept.
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER:
BUDGET REVISION
No: � � 2.2
Date: ,5 - 3�4y
ADMINISTRATNE ORDER, Consistent wAh the autfiorily granted to the Mayor in Section 50.07.4 of tfie City Charter and based on
the request of the Director of the Office of City Attorney
to amend the 1994 budget of the Generel Fund fund, the Director of the
Finance and Management Services Department is authorized to amend said budget in the following manner.
DEPARTMENT & DIVISION:
LEDGER, FUND, AC7IVITY, O&IECT, PROJECT
General Government Accounts
City Attorney
Worker's Compensation
GL-001 09020-0131 Certified — Temporary
GL-001 09020-0442 Temporary Total
GL-001 09020-0444 Permanent Partial Disabilny
GL-001 09020-0446 Retraining Benefrts
GL-001 09020-0448 Ancillary Cost
00'I 09020-0450 Temporary Partial Disabifity
A�I Other Activity Spending
CURRENT
BUDGEf
0
600,000
355,000
85,000
675,000
180,000
1,170,048
3,065,048
��rl�'
Date
11 � �l
Date
Date
APPROVED
CHANGES
21,707
(2,633)
(5,265)
(5,849)
(5,095)
(2,865)
0
0
AMENDED
BUDGEi
21,707
597,367
349,735
79,151
669,905
i 77,135
1,170,048
3,065,048
•
A'pproved by: Budget Director
�i o0�22
DEPAHTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE MRIAiED
cit Attorne Q i.�t, GREEN SHEE N_ 20684
CONTACTPEflSONdPHONE �DEPARTMENtDIPECTOfl OCIT'COUNCIL IN(fIAVDATE
Bruce Ferrario 266-8767 ASS�GN �CRYATfORNEV �CRVCLERK
BE ON WUNCIL AGET3DA BY (DAT� pp��� � BUDGE! DiAECiOfi O NN. 8 MGI SERVEC£S DIP..
OPOEN OMpYOR(ORASSISTAN'i) � Finance/A
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL I.00ATIONS POH SIGNATURE)
ACTION FiEDUESTED:
Approval to transfer existing spending authority to cover expenditures for the
Modified duty worker program.
RECOMMENDAnONS: Approve (q) or Rejeet (R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTFACTS MUSY ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS:
_ PLANNMG COMMISSION __ CIVIL SEflVICE COMMISSION �� Hd5 tt115 pBfsO�fin eVef WOfked u0def 8 ConVaCt fOf thi5 departmBM?
_ CIB CAMMI77EE _ YES NO
2. Has this personfirm ever been a city empfoyee?
_ STAFF _— YES NO
_ DISTRIC7 CqUH'r _ 3. Does this perSOMirm possess a skill not nortnally possessad by any current city employee?
SUPPOFiTSWHICHCOUNCILO&IECfIVE7 YES NO
Explain ell yea answers on separete sheet and ettaeh to green sMeet
INITIATING PROBLEM. �SSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, Whet, When. Whare, Why):
F]nployee on Work Comp with permanent injury needed job change. Original department was
unable to re-hire. This was "pilot" or "test" case of Modifiecl Duty Worker Program.
ANTAGES IF APPROVED
Dnployee able to work permanent light-duty job in Purchasing Department.
�, -
� �..,,.,s.....,3 i i
`ti� �" �
DISADVANTACaESIFAPPROVED:
�EC�.1VE1� At�� 9 � =�94
None. � - 3199� �UQ�'�T OFfl�E
C►T� CLER1�
DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVED:
Employee would have to go back on workers' comp, which is a slightly higher cost to City,
than to have her employecl.
TO7AL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 4� 1�O 1 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIHCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDINGSOURCE O9OZO ACTIVI7YNUMBER 09020-04XX
FINANCIAL INFORMATION (EXPLAIN) /y �,�/
C1 v�y