D002603CITY OF SAINT PAUL
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
• Approved Copies to:
• City Clerk (Original) Administrative Order
• FinancialServices—Accounting No.: �i'(� ���
• Requesting Department Date: ?-/a- /](p
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12,
13
14
1s
16
17
18
19
20
�
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, Consistent with the authority granted to The Mayor in Secrion 10.07 of the City Chapter and
based on the request of the Duector of the Depazhnent of Planning and Economic Development, to amend the 2005 budget. The
D'uector of the Office of Financial Services is authorized to amend said budget in the following manner:
Administrarive Order dishibutes pending projects budget to 2006 PED Administrative costs. Matching requuement for Block 4
(Minnesota Mutual) TIF Distdct.
City downtown Capital Projects Fund #149
SPENDING PLAN
149-76902-0547-68002 Pending CapitalProjects
149-76901-0547-69107 Local Match Block 4 TIF Dishict
149-76901-0299-69106 PED Admuustration
Total Spending Plan
Net Increase
�-�L F4��✓'�
Prepazed by: Activity Manager (Date)
G '
.
�\ _�
Reque ted b: Department Duector (D
Current Amended
Bud2et Chan¢es Bud¢et
z,soo,000 (i,000,000� i,soo,000
0 75,500 75,500
0 924,500 924,500
2,SOQ000 2,500,000
Approved by: D'uector Financial Services (Date)
•
bDO�-f�0�
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
; Departrnentloffice/counciL• ( Date Initiated:
� P -P��mg&�oa�;�De�e�o�� j 2¢�R� i Green Sheet NO: 3030514
'- ContactPersonBPhone: -,
� Surjeet Vertna
� 2G6-�672 /�ssign
i Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): Number
For
Routing
� Order
ContractType:
A6-0TNER ADMINISTRATNE ORDER
2 IPlannine & Economic Develoo � D"vec[or/T. Schertler �
3 �� _ naqcial Service5 _ NSnancial Services i
4 'N Clerk _ C5N Clerk
� 5 �lannine & Economic Develon Sorieet Verma
Total # of SignaW re Pages _(Clip All Locations for SignaW re)
Action Requestetl:
Administrarive Order to Downtown Capital Projects Fund F-149 that distributes pending projects budget to 2006 PED Admuustrative
costs� Matching requirement for Block 4 TIF District.
iaatlons: Approbe (A) or H
Planning Commission
CIB Committee
CiHI Service Commission
U¢peItRlEf1L senu o rewan
1. Has this personlfifin eeer wvrked under a contract for this department?
Yes No
2. Has this persoNfirtn e�er been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this persoNfirm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any
curtent city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separete sheetand attach to greensheet
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity(Who, What, When, Where, Why):
The 2006 budget placed an amount in the Pending Projects activity in anticipation of assigning project codes and further refinement of
spending decisions. Net change is zero to the budget. '
Advantages If Approved:
The budgets will now reflect spending plans and allow simpler treatment of the subordinated note expendihues.
Disadvantages IfApproved:
None.
Disadvanqges If NotApprovetl:
The process of accounting for the Suboidinated Note will be unduly complicated and possible double budgeting of projects will be
avoided.
Transaction:
Fundiny Source: 149-76902-0547-68002
Finan cial Information:
(Explain)
AcCnity Number. 149-76901
�
RECEIVED
�U� 1 2 2006
C17Y CLERK
CosURevenue Budgeted:
Apnl 24, 2006 823 PM Page 1