1909 (21) T Pt
4 r
Bd F No. 3901 -,_,y Aid. Montgomery—`
Whereas, t was heretofore pre
sented tor to t ; of Aldermen, one
of the brand, the Common Coun-
" 'cil of the City , t. Paul, the petition
7 of Rufus C. sj'L ,,,an and others, the
f owners of all the land and property
1 ,, i abutting upon and adjoining the street
YY! * ^ hereinafter described, praying for the
,„ vacation of that portion of La Salle
street lying between.thty, outherl.y line
g• '�� I of Charles street and'at:liile parallel
¢ with the southerly line,of said Charles
• °` F „ 'i �m '4'''70,7 street and 113 feet southerly there-
w r' from, in the City of St. Paul, Minnesota,
r` and more particularly d and
< shown upon the plat annexedescribed to said
petition, which said petition is duly
verified, as required by,law, and sets
forth the facts and reasons for such
�r� vacation; and
WHEREAS, There was heretofore pre,sen tei Whereas, the said Board of Aldermen
+ deemed it expedient that the matter
therein referred to should be proceeded
Aldermen, one of the branches of the Common C o unc�:with and ordered said petition and ac-
companying plat to be filed of record
in the office of the 'City Clerk of said
city, and ordered said City Clerk to
give Paul , the petition of Rufus C . Jefferson and other;cal paper by'publ city in the manner paper of said city lnthe manner,
and for the time required by law, that
said 'petition and the subject matter
the land and property abutting upon and adj oinin= :thereof would be heard and considered
_- by the Committee on Streets of said
Board of Aldermen at its regular meet-
ing to be held in the Council Chamber
described, praying for-the-vacation of that port ioi Bulidhi n°sa pit on�the' ist day
of December, 1900, at 4 o'clock p. m.,
lying between the southerly line of Charles street which said notice was duly published
> > and given; and I
Whereas, said Committee-on .Streets,
of said Board of Aldermen did meet
with the southerly line at the time and place above mentioned
y of said Charles street and and apointed therefor, and did then
and there duly investigate and consider
the matter of said proposed vacation,I
therefrom, in the City of St . Paul , Minnesota, and and did d.hen and there ed on all testa
a
many nd evidence rldu on, the part'
of said petitioners and. other'-persons
interested in the matter of said pro-.
i pro-
posed vacation, and did take proof of
cribed and shown upon the plat annexed to said pet the Matters averred in said petition,
and being of the opinion that the
prayer of said petition should be grant
petition ' a f ' e , s ed upon the terms hereinafter stated,
is duly verified as required by law and a did duly report its conclusions to said.1
Board of Aldermen, recommending the
adoption of an appropriate resolution
reasons for such vacation; and declaring said vacation; now therefore,.
it is hereby '
Re, ierl.,4.1__the Common Council of
WHEREAS, The said Board of Aldermen de U 07 ui29q oapis i am la a e""a'�luod
`aaa,r4s rd i- -.urn
the matter therein referred to should be proceededl? uu� gaeP�e 4"e 44Oat;svu149 4uBluu
v -an¢ a, of `laa3 S9i 4 rddrssrssr rr
-urbaq .aprs34s�ea o ti4.rouo}aa aua44 nu
4
petition and accompanying plat to be filed of recd -r.xdns•4srxa loours); apra4sur[Ou7seB
{ pacu-au U r aaagm 4uaurao 4ua o
City- �i 4sallctaKau}�a3loasat4 �o vI aPrsa4ura
Clerk of said City , and ordered said City Cie, jEzL4v� _ Wi,,, ,, s
?..:,x°pis;
publication in the official paper of said City in the manner and for the
time required by law, that said petition and the subject matter thereof
would be heard and considered by the Committee on Streets of said Board
of Aldermen at its regular meeting to be held in the Council Chamber in
the Court House and City Hall Building in said City on the 31st day of
December, 1908 , at four o'-clock P . M. , which said notice was duly publish-
ed and given; and
WHEREAS, Said Committee on Streets of said Board of Aldermen
did meet at, the time and place above mentioned and appointed therefor,
and did then and there duly investigate and consider the matter of said
proposed vacation, and did then and there hear all testimony and evidence
adduced on the part of said petitioners and other persons interested in
the matter of said proposed vacation, and did take proof of the matters
averred in said petition, and being of the opinion that the prayer of said
petition should be granted upon the terms hereinafter stated, did duly
report its conclusions to said Board of Aldermen, recommending the adop-