10-802City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT
NO. 10-&02
�oR
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voring
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
VB 1002B (108922) collection of delinquent vacant building fees (re-invoiced) Febniary, 2010 at 223 Robie St. E.
LAID OVER TO 07/06/10 LEG FIEARING AND 07/21/10 PUBLIC HEARING
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment
having been further wnsidered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One
equal installments.
Bostrom
Carter
Harris
Stark
Adopted by Gouncil: Date
Adoption Certified by
By: _ _���
�
�
Secretary
Reques b nent f: ' ci 1 Services
By:
Approved by ce
By: F�A�
Approved by City Atton
By: I�GC (/f,
Approve M or Eor
By ' — — —'
�
1d-�r�a
3uly 21, 2010 City Council Action Minutes Page 14
64. Resolution Ratifying Assessment — 10-802 — In the matter of the assessment of
benefits, cost, and expenses for collectian of delinquent vacant building fees (re-
invoiced) in February 2010 at 223 Robie Street East [VB 1002B] (GS3115356-
Ward 2) (Legislative Hearing Officer reeammends reducing the assessment from a
total of $1,235 to a total of $835)
Adopted as amended Yeas — 5 Nays — 0
�.o-LN - o7-a� �t� Lo �'�l-07 �-i�
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
r l 1
DepartmenU�ce/Council: Date initiated:
w O�, 1U-25U1
FS –FnancialServices 2�,1UN2010 Green Sheet NO: 3115356
Contact Person & Phone: Denartment SeM To Person �
LynnM05ef � 4 �nancialServices DaveNeLson ��
2fi68851 1 xv Attorney Liss Vvth
Assign Z �nan�ialServices etKe
Must Se on Councit Agenda hy (Date): Number 3 a or's Office MavodAsastant
For
Routing 4 onnc�l � Mary Ericicson
Doc. T �THER (DOESNT FIT ANY Order 5 ' Clerk 56ari Moore
�� CATEGORI�
E-0xument Required: Y
Document Contact 1Cmi Ramr+ei�er
Contaet Phone: 2668656
Totai � of Signature Pages _(CYp All Locations for Signature)
Action REquested:
At Council's request this item was laid over to 07-06-10 LEG HEARING and 07-21-10 PUBLIC HEARING collection of
delinquent vacant building fees (re-invoiced) February, 2010 at 223 Robie St E. File No. VB 1002B
Recommendations: Approve (A� or Reject (R): persnnal Service Contracts Must Answer the Following Questions: <
Planning Commission 1. Has this person/firtn ever worked under a conUact for fhis department?
CIB Committee Yes No
Civil Service Commission 2. Has ihis persoNfirm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Dces this persoNfirtn possess a skill not noimally possessed by any
cu�rertt city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on uparate sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Ptoperty owne�s must register vacant and unoccupied structures with the Depar[ment of Safery and Inspections and pay an annual
vacant building fee.
AdvanWges If Approved:
Co1lecNon of delinquent vacant building fees.
DisadvaMages B Approved:
None
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
The general fund would be required to pay the assessment.
ToWI Amount ot
Transaction: $1 ,235.00 CostlRevenueBUdgeted:
Funding Source: Activity Number. ���'���
Financial Information:
SE�cplain) - �. �.
I property owner will be norified of the public headng and chazges. ��� y � f �� ���
i�� ����&8�
fl.�,(�
�
June 21, 2010 8:07 AM Page 1
July 6, 2010 Legislative Hearing Minutes
Summary Abatement Assessments referred back by Council on 6/I5:
VB 1002 Co1lection of de]inquent vacant building fees re-invoiced in February 2010
223 Robie Street East (VB1002)
10-802
Page ] 0
Mr. Yannarelly stated that this was a category 2 vacant buitding which file was opened on lanuary
4, 2008. The vacant building fee went to assessment in the amount of $1,235; however, a certificate
of code compliance was issued on June 1], 2010.
Dan Baler, Buy Rite Companies, explained that the building was not completed timely because the
general contractor had baled on the groject. He asked that the fee be xeduced oi forgiven.
Ms. Moermond stated that the building was vacant for more than half the year; therefore, she
recommended reducing the assessment from a total of $1,235 to a total of $835.
io-so2
�
a
G�
5
F
L
R
Q
�
N
W
O
E
«
Q
�
0
0
a =
� o
u �
d o
L �
a a
� w
m
m q
a a
9 O
Q �+�'
a "
a;
C(� C4
m
E
d
d
C
�
0
L
.�
.c
a
0
O
N
W
�
T
° o
�
i
IQ
�o
���
��
IN
I N
��
�
�
� p
Io 0 o O
I O � O V�
O N cn
I ^• .-. 69 N
L .� !a4 �
IEP fH
S'
I
I
I O O O
�IO��
�r'�
I
�
� 0 0
a I�^N
c l
I
�
I �
IN W
C � k' �
' l a w Q
�� �'� ,C v
h'�� �
W
m I m v� c`�i
" I>qc4
� �'¢
�^
��
� �o
�j
. ` W
I F ,
¢ N
G I n, x
a
i. I w m
d F C
N
L I O F
� I � O
�
�
�
�
�
�
� � `� W
m I� p N F
�R`�� W
x � o � y �
� Iv�:,�p
� � � �
c � � � � M
,Z a � P" N
I W N V] #
>`
�
�
4
�
F�
�
�
O
:
0
0
�
�
�
N tp
' d '
C
'�O C
3a
k iF
F �
O
z
�
a�
0 0 ° o
O �n O
O � �
.-� �
�
�
ai W
W �
� ' �
= 6 W �
Q� E' m
� Q L�
>Qcu
yC iC N
'r� F F
c
0
V1
M
N
GA
H
V
R R
o � p"
E"' = o.
c� L Y
' R k
y P+ Fzl
QI nM Q