Loading...
D11272 C I T Y OF S A I N T P A U L OFFICE OF THE MAYOR roved Copies to: ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: -City Clerk(Original) BUDGET REVISION -Finance Dept.'s Accounting Division -Requesting Dept. No: 1 Date: 1.1-17- ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, Consistent with the authority granted to the Mayor in Section 10.07.4 of the City Charter and based on the request of the Director of the Department of Executive Administration to amend the 1990 budget of the General fund, the Director of the Department of Finance and Management Services is authorized to amend said budget in the following manner: DEPARTMENT&DIVISION: Executive Administration CURRENT APPROVED AMENDED FUND AND ACTIVITY: BUDGET CHANGES BUDGET FROM: 00103-0252 $6,255 ($2,500) $3,755 00103-0114 $111,571 ($8,000) $103,571 00103-0259 $1,050 ($800) $250 00100-0114 $345,349 ($5,000) $340,349 00101-0111 $286,594 (7,500) $279,094 ($23,800) TO: 00100-0222 $2,700 $300 $3,000 • 00100-0223 $3,640 $500 $4,140 00100-0245 $150 $1,000 $1,150 00100-0251 $2,800 $6,000 $8,800 00100-0252 $2,250 $2,000 $4,250 00100-0253 $1,600 $500 $2,100 00100-0255 $200 $300 $500 00100-0276 $936 $800 $1,736 00100-0285 $5,600 $1,300 $6,900 00100-0299 $832 $3,600 $4,432 00100-0255 �-o $7,500 $7,500 23,800 TOTAL CHANGES $0 This Administrative Order reallocates spending authority according to the needs and priorities of the Scheibel administration. The 1990 budget was prepared by the previous administration. 11111111111pared by: Activity M ager Efate Approved by: fAayor Date R ested by: Department Director Date swanson/LOT90resolu bons/AOM AY/12-12-90 -DI DEPARTM T/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATh ("'` go GREEN SHEET I�° _ 13055 CONTACT ERS &PHONE ©DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR NITIAUDATE ❑CITY COUNCIL INITIAUDATE zL/��l �3p23 ASSCITY ATTORNEY ®CITY CLERK ST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) NU BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN.&MGT.SERVICES DIR. RO- � ORMAYOR(OR ASSISTANT) TOTAL/# OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: �� �.z..�r�•� e--rc�e�- J".0 a��occt� � G!!/Y��' G/ RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? _ CIB COMMITTEE YES NO STAFF 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? _ — YES NO DISTRICT COURT 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why): Lee K- doQS lelf ANTAGES IF APPROVED: 7Za DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: Mi NK 'CITY CLERK TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN)