Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
D10775
White — city Clerk CITY O F SAINT PA U L Pini*. — Finance Dept. Canary— Dept. OFFIGE OF THE MAYOR No: 'Dlogg5 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER I —I I^q0 • Date: ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, In the matter of that certain contract known as Activity No. 29081 for street lighting on FLANDRAU/CASE, City Project No. 89-V-8039, Collins Electrical Const. Co.-, ,Contractor.. the specified date of completion is Nov. 30, 1989, and the Contractor did not complete the contract by said date of completion because of unavoidable construction delays, and it is hereby ORDERED, That the City of Saint Paul, through its Mayor, extends the time of completion to March 31, 1990, and it is FURTHER ORDERED, That the City of Saint Paul hereby waives all claims for liquidated damages and that no engineering and inspection costs on this project will be charged to the Contractor for such extended period. z MEK:kaj APPROVED AS TO FORM Assistan City Attorney a • /A;Date q 7 trative Assistant to Mayor - 71 107'75 DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL JNUSIBER TE INITIATED Public Works GREEN SHEE NO. 765,1' CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE I IAL/ T ITIAL/DATE �CTOR''� F7 CITY COUNCIL f 1 i k e K o t i l a 292-7863 IGN ITY ATTORNEY ®CITY CLERK FOR SST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) UTING BUDGET DIRECTOR 9:1 FIN.A MGT.SERVICES DIR. DER ©MAYOR(OR ASSISTANT) TOTAL #OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: s a 7 Approve attached Administrative Order for Contract Extension RECEIVED JAN RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) COUNCIL COMMITTEEIRESEARCH REPORT (OPTIONAL) ANALYST P ONE N PLANNING COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION _CIB COMMITTEE _ A STAFF COMMENTS:OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR —DISTRICT COURT _ DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? '!-ND MANAGEMENT SERVICES INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why): The contractor was unable to complete the project by the specified completion date. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The contractor would not be unfairly penalized. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: N/A RECEIVED JANi olm CITY CLERK DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: The contractor • would be unfairly penalized. DOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ N/A COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO N/A C89-2T622-0784-29081 FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN)