10-707• ; _ ,, �, � � i �
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT
COUNCIL FILE NO. %� - � Z��
By � �
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
►1%�
CRT1001B (108911) collection of delinquent certificate of occupancy fees (re-invoiced) at 1738 University
Ave W in January, 2010.
LAID OVER TO 06/15/10 LEG FIEARING AND 07/07/10 PUBLIC HEARING
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment
having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified.
I�E�f3b�
eq�l�nns�k�t�
assessment is
of $515.00 to a
Bostrom
Carter
Harris
Helgen
Stazk
Thune
Absent Requested �ac� t: Financ" 1 ervi es
By:
Approved by i e' e
By: NA
Approved by City Attorney
BY� l.SGL o 1 ��
Adopted by Council: Date 7�7�o7jJ// Approved��y'1Gi�y for Submission t�
Adoption Certified by Co cIl Secretary B ��
�
By:
Approv� DaYe � f 5
/ ��fiL�N��
By: �
� -i
City of St. Paul
Office ofFinancial Services
Real Estate Section
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT
COLTNCILFILENO. J�'�-U�
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment I�Io. SEE BELOW
Voring
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
CRTl001B (108911) collection of delinquent certificate of occupancy fees (re-invoiced) at 1738 University
Ave W in January, 2010.
LAID OVER TO 06/15/10 LEG HEARING AND 07l07/10 PUBLIC HEARING
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
The Financial Services Real Estate Section hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the
expenditures necessarily incurred for and in wnnection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total costs
DSI Admin Fee
Pazks Admin Fee
Charge-Code Enforcement
Real Estate Service Charge
Attorney Fees
$380.00
$115.00
$
$ 20.00
$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Charge To
Net Assessment
$515.00
$515.00
Said Financial Services Real Estate Section further reports that it has assessed and levied the total amount
as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $515.00 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted
by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or pazcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred
thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature ofthe Real
Estate Manager, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by said Real Estate Section, and which
is herewith s� D ubmitted to the Council for such action thereon as may co �r proper.
Dated ��l �
Real Estate Manager:
: La LN - �-�s-ie �o ��- - 7-7- ��
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
>n e'
DepartmentlOfEicelCouncH: Date lnitiated: i v - � v
FS -FinancialServices p4JUN2010 Green Sheet NO: 3114296
ContaM Person & Phone: Deoar6nent Sent To Person InitiaUDate .
Lyf10 MOSef � 0 inancial Services Dave Nelson �(, �(1.�
266-8851 1 ' Attorn Lisa Veith
Assign 2 inaocialServices Mar tKell
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Dafe): Number ; or's Ofiice Ma or/Assisfaot
For
Rouflng 4 oaucil Ma Erickson
Doc. Order 5 " Clerk ShariMoore
CATEGORI�
EAocument Required: Y
�ocumentConWet: �mRanweiler
Contact Phone: 266-8856
ToWI # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Lowtions for Signature)
Aetion Requested:
At Council's request this item was laid over to 06/15/] 0 LEG HEARING and 07/07/10 PUBLIC HEARING; collection of delinquent
cerlificate of Occupancy fees (re-invoiced) at 1738 University Ave W in January, 2010. File No. CRT1001B
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Persona! Service Contracts Must Mswer the Following puestions:
Plannirg Commission t. Has this personlfirtn ever worked under a cordract for this department?
CIBCommittee Yes No
Civil Service Commission 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this person/firtn possess a skill not normally possessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, WhaR �en, Where, Why):
Proper[y owners pay for an inspecdon on commercial buildings or buildings for residen[ial occupancy indicating an existing struct�re
complies wi[h all state and local safety codes.
Advantages IfApproved:
Collection of delinquent payments for certificate of occupancy inspections.
Disadvanqges If Approved:
None
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
The general fund would be required to pay ihe assessment.
,.-- %s.t� �1�
TotaT���o^. $515.00 CosURevenue Budgeted: `yy
Funding Source: Activity Number: -. _' � iu
Fnanciai Inf (� bn� ��� u ����y�
lain � °� a�
I property owner wili be norified of the public hearing and chazges.
June 4, 2010 9:59 AM Page 1
0
S
�
a
n
9
5
1
O �` 'y
h r -e
X y �
3 � T
: �. o
� m
�
�
�
O
O
���
O O O
ID � �
�OC�
rn � rn
m
`7 u-°n
� .�
o �
n�
p. o -c
� co v
_ �
�
rn
� � w
N � o0
O V� O
O O O
O O O
+ .X- ,.U.' N �„ I
� � F+ O O
= � a ^ � _
�. ,y W : �' = �
� =��
� � Z z m a � o
o .. c �I
: C _ y K
� C7 °° 3�
�z�
w
�., rn w r I -
o .a c � I
o �
C I�
� ��
�
OT�
'� O � z
O
-� � I Z
°°�
a >' cy
o��
�E� �.
r-I
OQ �
O�I -j
�Po�
n
ti
* � d � � m
� � 3
� �Q��
� w � p� H
� � � � I �
fl. a� a r
� rn a+ � p
� �
` 6 y � �
K � I
� I
3F I
I
I
1 �.
O tn r �
O O O I
O O O
I
I
WI W �
_
� �- O
O O O
O O O I
I
I
I S
Z
v�i 6s� w�
� o�,ol a
0 ooa a
0 000�
�
�
w{
� � b
W �
p � �
o i C7
�I
I
o *
o �
"' m
>
z
0
'< ,-�i
g �
N