10-648City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT
AMENDED 6/16/2010
COUNCIL FILE NO._1C2-��`1L._
� �
By % <"L I �
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
a�
J1002V1 (108905) towing of abandoned vehicles from private properiy during November, 2009 at 298 Jenks
Ave.
LAID OVER TO 06/15/10 LEG HEARING AND 06/16/10 PUBLIC HEARING
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment
having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be�ayab�i�r9�i€
6C�-1�ktStd��li�€iitrr. de le t e d.
Adoption Ce�rtified by Council Secretary
BY� // //Jifi� �i`!lSCJ�
Approved b a. Date 2 Z_ �
BY� � r,t .-��
�
Reques by nt of. Finance�l S ices
BY� � � �i
Approvedby O€f�se-af,F�' �c,} Se i"
J � / �
By: � Il i/
Approved by jty Attom y /�
BY� �J � • !/G�
Approved ay for S 'ssion o o�lmcil
By:
Adopted by Council: Date ��1L>fad�p
Ciry of St. Paul
Office of Financial Services
Real Estaxe Section
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT
COUNCIL FII,E NO. CI /�-
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
J1002V 1(108905) towing of abandoned vehicles from private property during November, 2009 at 298 Jenks
Ave.
LAID OVER TO 06l15/10 LEG HEARING AND Q6/16/1Q PUBLIC HEARING
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
The Financial Services Real Estate Section hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the
expendihxres necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total costs
DSI Admin Fee
Pazks Admin Fee
Charge-Code Enforcement
Real Estate Service Charge
Attorney Fees
$79514
$150.00
$
$
$ 20.00
$ 5.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Charge To
Net Assessment
$970.14
$970.14
Said Financial Services Real Estate Section further reports that it has assessed and levied the total amount
as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $97014 upon each and every lot, part or pazcel of land deemed benefitted
by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or pazcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred
thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, idenrified by the signature of the Real
Estate Manager, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by said Real Estate Section, and which
is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may b sidered proper.
Dated 5 yl �f� �������t
� Real Estate Manager:
Green Sfiee�reen�heet Gree�Sheet Green Sheet Gre She� r�en sh�e
� /yr ♦ (�
)epartrnentlOffice/Council: Date Initiated: ` /o —`� �"
FS — FinanciaiServices p�ry�qyp010 Green Sheet NO: 3112456
Contaet Person & Phone:
Lynn Moser
266-8851
Must Se on Council Agenda by (Date):
Dx. Type:OTHER (DOESNT FITANY
CATEGORI�
E-0oeumentRequired: Y
DocumentCOnWct: �mRanweiler
ContaM Pbone: 266-8856
�
Assign
Number
For
Routing
Order
Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip !Uf Loeations for Signature)
0�'ioanciatServiar I� DaveNeison I �I "�ei�
1 ity Attemey ( — Lisa �Ith —{ )
At CounciPs request this item was laid over to 06/IS/10 LEG HEARING and 06/16/10 PUBLIC HEARING, towing of abandoned
velricles from private properry during November, 2009 at 298 Ienks Ave. File No. 71002V I
Recommendations_ Approve (A) or Rejec[ (R):
Planning Commission
CIB Committee
Civil Service Commissiort
Pe'sonal Service Contracts Must Answer 1he Following Questions:
7. Has lhis persontfirm ever worked under a contract for ihis departrnenY?
Yes No
2. Has this personlfirm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this personlfirtn possess a skill not normally possessed by any
currenl city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on sepa2M sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, lssues, OppoRunity (Who, What, When, IMiere, Why):
Property owners or renters create a health hazazd at various fimes throughout the City of Saint Paul when their properiy is not kept up.
The Ciry is required by Ciry code to clean up the property and chazge the property owner for the clean up.
Advanqges HApproved:
Cost recovery programs to recover expenses for summary abatement, grass cutting, towing of abandoned velucles, demolitions,
garbage hauling, tree removal and boazdings-up.
DisadvanWges If Approved:
None
Disadvantages tf Not Approved:
If Council does not approve these charges general fund would be required to pay the assessment.
Total Amount of $970.14
Trensaction:
Funding Source:
Financial Information:
(Expiain)
CosURevenue 8udgeted:
Activity Number:
I properry owner will be notified of the public hearing and charges.
"E: ;ffr���t
��!r`sl G ;'; ��i�t#
May 21, 2070 9:54 AM Page 1
June 15, 2010 Legislative Hearing Minutes
Page 2
Smmnary Abatement Assessment refened back by Council on 5/19: `u�`� D
J1002V Towing of abandoned vehicles from October to November, 2009
298 Jenks Avenue (J1002�
Owner did not attend the May 4 LH.
Mr. Essling stated that orders were issued on November 12, 2009 to remove three abandoned
vehicles from the property with a compliance date of November 18. The property was re-inspected
on November 18 and was not in compliance. Tluee work orders were sent to the SPPD who
removed the vehicles from the property on November 23, 2009 for a total assessment of $970.14.
There was no retumed mail.
Tom Dondlinger, property owner, stated that he had lived at the property for the past 12 years and
for whatever reason, the USPS stopped delivering his mail to him at his home. He went so far as to
talk to the district manager who assured him that there would be no fi�rther problems with his mail
delivery. He said that if he had received the orders, he would have donated the vehicles rather than
having them towed.
Ms. Moermond responded that she understood he had ongoing issues with the USPS and that he
didn't take care of it in a timely manner. She said she would delete the assessment; however, she
would not forgive any future assessments against the property.
�
G
i�
F
L
v
Q
R
�
N
O
a
O
�
Q
0
o�
ti =
0
U =
d O
O y
aa
i
y Q
i Q
a c
9 O
T �
� 6;,
c ce
m
E
v
�
C
�
7
i
a
.�
s
❑
a.
�
N
N
0
�
.°.
i
��
�0
i�
�~
� N
� N
;d
I M ,
�
1
la o o O a
0 0 0 -
�� o o vi o
� ^ N Hi h
� r Fn c�
v� v3 vj
I
I
I
IC O O O
O O O
iP O - .�
�
I
O O O O
I �N'^
I
� *
I
I Y
� w a
I R
� F
I� N'�O C
� y t°-'d � <C
� C � [y
�oa ;°. � c
� Q' Q+ C O
m � `o *
I P Vl v � �
I 4C1cG¢
�
�
�-
�a
�o
IF
��
�°
�o
��
�
I
I
I
I
I
I o
I N W O
� � M � �
G o , � N
�b � � �
ia��,x w
Q ¢v, z o
I W Y � � � m
C
� Y � 'O �p
����"N3a
IFN�� ..
l
•I
L
C
�
�
c
�
V
�
0
V
m
0.
L
L
G
X >
x
cCa
° c�=
a x o
� % £
c °
o¢
- v'a
F�KC
�
z
�
W���
a $ $ �
* 000
333
� O O O
vi o o �n
� � � �
f9 f13
ti
1 1 :
/
O
c
�
Q
:'
F
w
C
R
Q
�
Q
�?
F
�
w
G
.�
v
Q �
N w
+ T
W m
� �
�i�
:'. �'
F F
�
0
�
Vj
\�.J
U
L
R tQ
o v R�
�"� O�
d L d
• R k
i 0+ [�1
a.�o
��o-���