10-630Council File # �
Green Sheet # � o�l f ((�
RESOLUTION
CITY F SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented by
�
1 WAEREAS, the Wa s i lock, commonly known as 189 — 191 East Seventh Siseet (tl�e "Site"), is a duly
2 designated Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Site. The Walsh Block is also listed on the National Register
3 of Historic Places. Occupying the site is a single, ttu�ee-story, red brick commercial building. This
4 building was designed in the Victorian Romanesque style by nineteenth century Saint Paul architect
5 E.P.Bassford. Construction was completed in 1888. The building's exterior is lazgely intact. The highly
6 ornamented, commercial storefronts consist of recessed entrances made from cast iron with a single fluted
7 column. The storefront windows on the main faqade are also highly ornamented with molded brick
8 pediments; and
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
WHEREAS, on or about January 20, 2010, the City's Department of Safety Inspections ("DSI") received
a complaint that new commercial signage had been installed on the Site_ DSI performed a site inspection
and determined that new commercial signage had been installed at the Site without having been reviewed
by the Heritage Preservation Commission ("HPC") and without the required sign permit; and
WHEREAS, by letter dated February 8, 2010, DSI informed Eric Burg, d/b/a/ Capital Guitars, LLC
("Capital") that the Site was a designated historic preservation site; that permits for exterior work
including sign installations were required; that permit applications must be reviewed and approved by the
HPC or its staff before any permits could issue; that sign installations must meet HPC design review
guidelines; and, that signage had been installed which did not comply with historic guidelines applicable to
the Site without the required permits. In particular, the DSI letter stated (1) the dome shape is not a
traditional shape and cannot be approved; (2) awnings must be installed within window openings and
cannot wrap the comer or extend across a whole building fapade; (3) the awning must be a canvas (fabric)
and cannot be shiny vinyl or plastic; (4) any writing or graphics on the awnings or sign must be reviewed
and approved and the enforcement notices further provided that the individuals could appeal this matter;
and
WHEREAS, on or about February 22, 2010, Capital duly filed an appeal from the February 8, 2010
enforcement letter and requested "after the facP' approval of the following signage installation proposal as
set forth in an HPC staff report dated March 18, 2010:
Capital has installed a 2' x 9' straight awning sign across the store front at 189 Seventh Street
East and a 2' x 19' 6"/2' x 9' L-shaped awning across the storefront and around the corner of 191
Seventh Street East. Both awnings are dome shaped, dark green in color, and constructed of
"Enlighten" fabric. Awnings contain text in an unknown font, reading: CAPITOL GUITARS; two
circular business logos; and one graphic image of an electric guitar. Awnings also have an 8"
free-hanging valance containing the following text in an unknown font: GUITARS, BASSES,
AMPLIFIERS, ACCESSORIES, LAYAWAY, LESSONS, REPAIRS, CONSIGNMENT, 651-
225-888, and CAPITOLGUITARS.COM. All text and images are predominantly white in color.
The awnings have been placed above the transom windows and extend to the outermost edge of
the pilasters demarking each bay. The staff report further noted that a similar awning had been
installed in 2002 by a previous business.
GF /t� -l030
:.
:•
r'1
�
e
e-
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Saint Paul, on May 5, 2010, duly conducted a public hearing
where all persons interested were afforded an opportunity to be heard regazding CapitaP s appeal and, at the
close of the hearing, based upon all the records, files, and testimony presented to the City Council, moved
to deny the said appeal concluding that Capital had failed to show that the HPC had made any error in its
facts, findings, or procedures relative to the HPC enforcement of the permit requirements and orders for
the said Site; NOW,
95 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOVED, that the appeal by Capital from the HPC's orders dated March 25,
96 2010 is herby denied for the reasons set forth herein; AND,
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
BE IT FUItI3TER RESOLVED, that Capital, having failed to demonstrate any enor in the facts,
findings, or procedures of the HPC in this matter, the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby adopts as its
own the findings and conclusions of the HPC as set forth in the FiPC staff report and findings dated March
18, 2010 and as communicated to Capital in the HPC letter dated Mazch 26, 2010; AND,
BE IT F'INALLY RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall immediately mail a copy of this resolution to
Eric Berg, d/b/a Capital Guitars, G&S Walsh Properties, LLC, the Zoning Administrator, the Building
official and the HPC.
Yeas Nays Absent Requ ed by D,Q ent of:
✓ Y
✓ �
B
Approved by the Office of Financial Services
Thune
Adopted by Council: Date _ ��/ly
Adoprion Certified by Coun 1 Secretazy
BY� �`/��/` f i
Appxoved� a y i.9 Date j w� �(p
BY� __��;� ,r V C/�f`_��,
By:
Approved by City Attorney
B . c% v�,�.— 6- Z— i �
Appro e y 1ay r for S 'ssion to Council
By:
C.f ID-( .30
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
: Department/Office/COUncii: � Date Initiated:
�A-°��^tt°meY 03JUN2010 Green Sheet NO: 3114216
' Contact Person 8 Phone: � Department Sent To Person {nitial/Date
JerryHendrickson � o c;ivanornev '
266$710 � �� i City Attornev Denartment Director
Assign 2'Cqty Attornev ' CtiN Attomev (s •�T- C+ �
Must Be on Council Agenda by ( atej: Number 3 Mavor's Office MayodASSistant
' 16JUN-10 �e,tj� `�, �� For ; .
. Routing - 4 Cauncl CiN CounN ,
�, Doa Type: RESOLUTION ! Order ', 5 Ciry Clerk Citv Clerk ' ,
E•DOCUmentRequired: Y
Document Contact: Julie Kraus
ConWct Phone: 266-8776
Total # of Signature Pages
(qip All Locations for Signature)
Action Requested:
Memorializing CiTy Council's May 5, 2010 motion to deny the signage installation application submitted by Eric Burg d/b/a Capital
Guitars, LLC for the property commonly Imown as Walsh Block at 189-191 East Seventh Street in Saint Paul.
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R):
Planning Commission
CIB Committee
Civil Service Commission
Personal Service Contracts Must Answer the Following Questions:
1. Has this personlfirm ever worked under a wntract for this department?
Yes No
2 Has this personlfrm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this personffirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, issues, Opportunify (Nlfio, What, When, Where, Why):
The Council is required pursuant to City Charter to have its actions reduced to writing either in the form of an ordinance or a
resolution dependent upon the nature of the mater before it. The decision of the Council in this matter required a written resolution in
order to comply with the Charter.
Advantages If Approved:
Disadvantages If Approved:
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
Total Amount of
Transaction:
Funding Source:
Financial Information:
(6cplainJ
Cost/Revenue Budgeted:
Activity Number:
June 3, 2010 1:57 PM Page 1
�
CTTY OF SAINT PAUL
Chrrstopher B Coleman, Mayor
April 19, 2010
Ms. Mary Erickson
City Council Research Office
Room 310 City Hall
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Dear Ms. Erickson:
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNMG &
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Cecrle Bedar, Onecmr
25 West Four(h Street
Sa:nt Pau1 M,1' SJ 102
CF 10-630
Q
Telephone 65l-266-6700
Facs+mde. 65/-228-3210
I would like to confirm that a public hearing before the City Council is scheduled for
Wednesday, May 5, 2010 for the following heritage preservation case:
Appellant(s):
File Number:
Purpose:
Location:
Staff
Recommendation:
Commission:
Eric Berg, Capitol Guitars, LLC
10-015
Appeal of a Heritage Preservation Commission decision denying
a proposal to install two vinyl domed awnings on the Walsh
Block. The proposal was completed without proper HPC review
or a sign permit (After-the-fact Review).
191 E. 7`� Street, Walsh Block, Heritage Preservation Site
Denial
Denial, including removal of the completed work within 90 days
of the date of the HPC decision (8 to 0).
I have confirmed this date with the office of Council Member Dave Thune. My understanding is
that this public hearing request will appear on the agenda of the CiTy Council at your earliest
convenience and that you will publish notice of the hearing in the Saint Paul Legal Ledger.
Thanks!
Please call me at 266-6714 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
s'"'- .� ._--
C ..,..-� ✓.;<=_�--�
Amy Spong-�'�
Historic Preservation Specialist
CC: Council Member Dave Thune
Peter Warner, CAO
Eric Berg, Appellant
File
NOTICE OF PUBLIC AEARiNG
1`he Saint Paul City Council will con-
duct a pubtic hearing on Wednesday, �May
5, 2010 in the City Councll Cl�amtiers.
Third Floor, City flall-Court House, 15
West Kello� Boulevard, to consider the
appeal of Eric Berg, Capitol Guitars, LLC
to a decision of the Heritage Preservatton
Commission denying a proposai to install
two vinyl domed avmings on the Wa7sh
Block at 191 East'7th Sh Walsh Block,
Heritage Preservation Site. [10A153
Dated: Apri121, 2010
MARY ERICKSON
Asslstant city CovnCil SeCretary
{April 26)
=s= 81: PAIIL IEGAL iE11GER = __—
227�9898d .
Document2
AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
IIEPARTMENI' OF PLANNiNG &
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEVT
Cecile Bedar, Drreclor
CF 10-630
�
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
Chns!opher B. Coleman, Mayar
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council Members
CC: Peter Wamer, CAO
Donna Drummond, PED
FROM: Amy Spong, HPC staff�•
RE: HPC appeal for 191 E. 7`" Street,
DATE: April 28, 2010
25Ules(FaurhStreet Tetephone 657-266-670:
SaeniPaul, �YlN�5102 Facsimrle: 6�1-218-3220
Walsh Block, Heritage Preservation Site
The following attachments highlight the main events that have taken place and relate to
the HPC review of the application to insta{I two vinyl domed awnings. The HPC review
was an After-the-Fact Review as the work was done without HPC approval or a sign
permit application:
_•
•
Document2
Page 1
Notice to City Council to schedule appeal.
�age 2
Grounds for an appeal by appeilant Eric Serg, Business Owner.
Pages 3 to 9
The Enforcement Notice from DSI-Zoning upon HPC staff learning of the awning
installation with proper approvals. There is also an email between zoning and HPC staff
address'rng the history of the previous awnings which were installed in 2002 with a sign
permit but without the proper HPC review and approval. E-mails between the owner and
HPC staff regarding the review process for After-the-Fact Reviews are aiso included.
Pages 10 to 32 '
The staff report recommending denial and site photos. Preservation Brief #44: 7he Use
of Awnings on Historic Buildfngs was also cited and given to HPC members for the
Public Hearing. The Brief is also included.
Pages 33 to 36
The application with attachments.
Pages 37 40 38
Unapproved summary minutes from the March 25 pubiic hearing.
Page 39
The finai decision letter denying the awnings and recjuiring that the current awnings be
removed 90 days from the date of the HPC decision.
AN AFFIRMATNE ACTION EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
e
5;>:.,:':
p �S�i�, EL .
�;
�ltAAA�
9
CI lY OF SAINT PAUL
Christopher B. Coleman, Mayor
tlpril 19, 20i 0
1bIs. Mary Erickson
Cify Council Reseazch Office
Room 3 I D City AaII .
SainfPaul, MN 55102
� � � DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & � ..
. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMb1QT � � -
� Cecile Bedar, D6ector . .
� � 25 Aest Fourth Street
. _ Scm[Paul, MN55102
�
^ CF 10-630
L�.
Telephone: 651-266b700
F¢csimile; 657-Z28-3220
Dear Ms. Erickson: �
I wo�ld tike to confirm that a public hearing 6efore the City CounciI is_ scheduIed for
Wednesday, May 5, 2010 for ihe foIlowing heritage preservation case:
Appellant(s): Eric Berg, CapitoI Guitars, LLC
File Number: 10-015
Purpose: Appeal of a Heritage Preserv2tioa Cam�tission decision denying.
a proposal fo install two vinyl domed awnings on the Waish
$lock. The proposal was completed without proper HPC review
or a sign permit (After-the-fact Review).
LocaHon: 19I E. 7`� Straef, Waish BIock, Heri�age Preservatian Site
Staff
Recommendation: Denial"
Cammission_ Denial, including removal'of the completed work•within 90 days
of the date of the I�C deczsion (8 to 0):
I have confirmed this date with ttie offiee of Council Member Dave Thune. My understanding is
that this public hearing request Fvill appear on the agenda of the City Council at your earliest'
convenience and that you will publish notice of the hearing in the Saint Paul Legal Ledger:
Thanks! .
S mcerely, ,
_: � ,
��_
F�ny Spon �_�`--�-
i�istoric Preservation Speciaiist '
CC: Council Nlember Dave Fhune
Peter Waraer, CAO
Eric Berg; Appelfant
File�
Flease call me at 266-6714 if you have any questiores.
k�."ocument2 . �� - . . � - � . � . . . � . - .
. - - AN AFFIRMRTIVE ACTION EQUAL�OPPORTUNITY�EMPLOYER
�
�
CF 14-630
� Capitol Guitars
191 7�' Street E
Sa?ntPaul, NL� 551�?
aor�19, 2010
.Tohn Manning
C�air of HPC '
Re: Appeai �o City Council, F�C �le � 10-015
After consideration we have decided to appeal the HPC's decision on fi1e'�I 0-015 to the
City Council.
We disagree with the HPC decision to deny our applicafion on the grounds that a sib
permit for these awnings was successfuily issued to tfie former tenant by the DSI in 2002
(permit #02-Q98522). They ha�e only been re-covered by us. We now understand that we
need a aew perrait, but we feel that if a permit was issued befare then it should not be
denied this time.
We feel that the awnings do not detract from the appearance of the building or
neighboring azea. There aze many similar awnuigs in the downtown area, inclucling other
kustoric buildings.
. Sincerely,
� ��
Eric Berg
Capitol Guitars LLC
��� — � 2��4
•
Z
� � CF 10-630
•
CITY OF SALrIT PAUL
Cnristopher B. Colemmz, Mayor-
DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY AND INSPEC7'IONS
Bob Kessler, Darector —
375Iac;son Sbeef, Smte 220
Saint Paul, ?vfinnesota 55101-1 H06
Telephane: 6�1-266-8984
Facsimrle: 6�1-266-9124
YJeb: www slpauT oaddri
ENFORCEMENT NOTICE
February 8, 2010
William Bergeron, Michaei Berg, Eric Berg
Capitaf Guitars LLC
534 Saint Peter Street
' Saint Pauf, MN 55101
RE: 189-191 Seventh Street East
•
•
Gentlemen:
A complaint was received regarding signage at the above referenced address. This property is
iocated in a B5, Central Business-Service Zoning Districfi.
During an inspection of the property ori January 20, 2010, I noticed the following:
Awnings with signage had been installed on the bui4ding front without permit approval by the
Department of Safety and Inspections (DSI) and the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC).
Section 64.203 (a) and (b) of the St Paul Legislative Code states:
App/ications for sign and/o� sign structure pe�mits sha/1 be submitted to the zoning
administrator. Each applicatioa sha// contain the names and addresses of the owners of the
disp/ay structure and property; the add�ess at which any sig�s a�e to be erected,• the /ot,
block and addition at which advertrsrng signs are to be erected and the street on which they
a�e to front; and a comp/ete sef of plans showing the necessary eleuations, distances, size
and detai/s to fully and dear/y represent the mnstruction and p/acing of the dispfa� structure,
App/ications sha// be accompanied by an a�dauit of a lease in fo�ce o� deed indicating the
consent of the owne�s of the p�operty on which the disp/ay st�uctu�e is to be erected.
This property is designated as a historic preservation site and all permits for exterior work must be
reviewed and approved by the HPC or HPC stafF before they can be issued. Signage must comply
with HPC design review guidelines. According to HPC staff, there are options for compliance but t(�e
signs that were instailed do not comply with the guidefines for the foflowing reasons: _
1. , Tfie dome shape is not traditionai shape and cannot be approved.
2. Awnings must be installed within window openings and cannot wrap the corner or extend
across a whole truilding fasade. -
3. The awning must be a canvas (fabric) and cannot be shiny vinyl or plastic.
4. Any writing or graphics on the awnings or signs must be reviewed and approved.
An Equal Opportunity Employer �
(�_
1!Ji[fiam Be�geron, Michaef �ery, cric 6erg
February 8, 20f0
Page.2
�� �ae�ci�r �o firarag �his ps�p�rty in�o Zae�ancg �oc�apt�anee yoaa aneas�:
o�emo�e ttse �xxest'sng awatisagsJsog�aa�e iss��eediateEy, csr .
m Stcbeaa6t a§¢gn per�aait a�{sla�a�aon to ttay aiten�eorr at D�I anef ask the �P� ��r a
� .� �nraierer �f the ge�ideli�es. &dPC� y�'f cam inf�re�s �os[ of the wai9a��m 7'he
ur�approv aenres6ngs sh�t( t2e revaewed by �he HPC at a psabi6c Iaearin�._
a�or€�ae� Pi�� s�a� at 651-2��-Ca?is to c�e�rss� a propcssal f�r s6g€sage%a�si�easg�.
. that evi[[ co�taply �i�h the guBdelines. Cors�p9e�e aasc4 subetti� a de�ign reerie�r Q �� �:
aPp{ication a�ri�Fa re�ised sig�a p8aies tFe�� c�m�a�y w�Els �he ge�ideEi€ses t€z ise ,
r��F�wred fa� staSfi arad/or �he EiP�. ;- �L'�
a As t9ais �ig�a e�as it���a6i�d �i��sou� a€a ap�ar�a�e€4 s�gaa p�re�i�, a do��s�e fee �o-6E be 7�. `° .
, p9ac�d oes �h� perasa6t. - �S
��
You may appeal this order and obtain a hearing before the 6aard of Zoning Appeals. The
app[ication for aa appeal must fiied and tf�e fee subm[f�ed ta t�5e Zoning Administrator within_ten
(10) Hays of the date this order was mailed. No appeal may be filed after that date. Applications
are availab(e at the Departrnent of Safety & rnspecf7ons main office ar on the G�y of St Paul
website (htt�:Uwww.stqauLqov). If you have any quesiions regarding this maiter, you rriay
contact me at 651.266.9�84. .
Yours trufY, .
�
` � � �`�,, _ � � � .
(<aren Zacho
Zaning Inspec`
c. .G & S Walsh Properties .
�i GFirist�ne BouEware, HPCstai�
�
F
_—
• .
�
- . _ " - . � - �- � - f •_.. �.
C� 10-630
� � c���-�� t
�:�< �oulware - RE: Heritage PreservatiQa Design ??eaiesv appiicatie�
= � cs�:
:c:
����.
S�s ;�e�_:
�? c - 2c�:�e3?s:
Hi Christine,
<eric(a�capi ioigtzitars. com>
°Chrisiine Boulware" <CYuistire.Boulware@ci.stpauLm.n.us>
2/22/20 1 0 3:33 P?vI
RE: Heritage Preservauon Design Review apptication
CG HPC application,pdf; Sc�n_Doc0003.pdi; PB250I13.7PG; PB25011 l.JPG; ��alshbidg.jpg
Thanks for calling me back, sorry I missed your cafl again. I figured email might be easier, i just had a
coupfe questions about the required plans & photos, since this is being done "after the facc".
Ratner than asking more questions, I am attaching what I have nght now: the application, photos of the
awnings, dimensions, etc. T'm aVso attaching a photo of the awnings before they were recovered in case
you need it (from when the previous tenants were here).
Please let me know if you need anything else,
Thank you so much for your help,
-Er�c Berg
e r ic@ca pitolg u ita rs, co m
www.capitolg uitars.com
�1-2Z5-8888
------- Original Message -------=
Subject: re: Heritage Preservation Design Review application
From: "Christine Bouiware" <Christine.Boulware@ci.stpaul.mn.us>
Date: Wed, February 17, 2010 11:48 am
To: eric@capitolguitars.com
Hi Eric,
Per our conversation this morning, attached is the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)
design review checklist and appiicacion� Piease call or email with any questions.
Rega rds,
Christine
Christine Boulware
� Me Historic Preservation Planner
Pfanning and Economic DevelopmenY
ZS Fourth Sireet West, Suiie 1400; Sainc Pau{, MN SSIOZ
P: 651-266-6715
F: 651-2Z8-3220
0���
Making Saint ?aul the Most Livable City in America
�
ziie:/!C:\Docu� and Settings\bouiwarc\Lccal �eitin�s�Temp\XPgrpwise\4B82A3DEmaildpo3... 2/221Z010
� � ��g�o��z
Christine Boulware - RE: Heritage Preservation Design Review application
From:
IC•�
Date:
Christine Boulware
eric@ ca pitolg u itars.com
2/23/2D10 4:52 PM
Subject: RE: Heritage Preservation Design Review application
Eric,
Do you want the HPC to review the work that was already completed that does not comply with the guidelines, or do
you want to work with staff to create an appiication that wiil compiy.
Going forward with the awnings as they are, staff would have to recommend denial and removal in the report to the
HPC for the public hearing.
Staff could review and approve canvas awnings of an appropriate size, shape and color that would be located within the
window frames and not wrap the corner. We would also look at the lettering/graphics on the awnings.
Please let me know ASAP if you are planning to go to the HPC for public hearing as I will have to get public notifications
mailed this week.
Regards,
Christine
� Christine Boulware
Historic Preservation Planner
Planniny and Economic Development
25 Fourth Street West, Suite 1400; Saint Paul, MN 55102
P: 651-266-6715
F,: 651-228-3Z20
christine boulwareCa�ci.stpaul.mn.us
r„�.•�
�-.�,n,.�� YBitf�€ ;��
Making Saint Paul the Most Livable City in America
»> <eric@capitolguitars.com> 2/22/2010 3:31 PM »>
Hi Christine,
Thanks for calling me back, sorry I missed your cali again. I figured email might be easier. I just had a
couple questions about the required plans & photos, since this is being done "after the fact".
Rather than asking more questions, S am attaching what I have right
awnings, dimensions, etc. I'm also attaching a photo of the awnings
you need it (from when the previous tenants were here).
Please let me know if you need anything else.
TFank you so much ior your h°Ip,
-Eric Berg
e r i c@ ca p i to Ig u ita rs. co m
www. ca p i to I g u i ta rs, co m
�1-225-8888
s�ow: the application, photos of the
before they were recovered in case
�
file://C:�Documents and Settings\boulwarc\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4B8407B8maildpo3l..: 2/23/2010
. __ _ � . - - � �
-- Original Message --------
Subject: re: Neritage Preservation Design Review appiication
f From: "Christine Boulware" <Christine.Boulware@ci.stpaul.mn.us>
I Date: Wed, February 17, 201D 11:48 am
; To: eric@cap'rto(guitars.com
; �
Hi Eric,
' Per our conversation tliis maming, attached is the Heritage Preservation Coinmission (HPC)
design review checklist and application. Please calE or email with any questions.
'. ��� � �. E�i
�
Regards,
Chri=tine
Christine Boulware
� Me Historic Preservation Planner
Planning and Economic Development
ZS Fourth Street West, Suite 1400; Saint Paul, MN 55102
P: 651-266-6715
F: 651-228-32Z0
i uo�o
Making Saint Paul the Most Livable City in Ameriea
n
•
�
�
tzle://C:U�ocuments and Settings\boulwarc�L,ocaT SettSugs\Temgl�gzpwise\4B8407B&maildpo3l... 2/23/2010
� � ��°l��
Christine �oulware - HPC review of awnings -
- �. _..���_. � z��-�����
From: Christine Boulware
To: eric@capitolguiCars.com
Date: 2/25/2010 8:56 AM
Subject: HPC review of awnings
CC: Spong, Amy
Hi Esic,
I got your message and tried calling this morning, but you're probably not at the store this early.
As for a"waiver" of the guidelines.., it doesn't exist. Karen in zoning wrote the letter and used zoning terminology. The
way the process works for HPC review is:
l. If the proposal for work complies with the guidelines NPC staff can review and approve the application
2. If the proposal does not comply, then the Heritage Preservation Commission reviews the application at a public
hearing.
The installation at the Walsh Block does not comply with the guidelines.
So, we could work on an application for awnings/signage that would comply and staff could review, or the HPC could
review the awnings/signage as an after-the-fact review at the next public hearing in March. 7fie dead�ine for an
application for the March 25th public hearing would be March 4, so you have a 4itt{e while to decide how you would like
to proceed.
gards,
ristine
Christine Boufware
Historic Preservation Planner
Planning and Economic Development
25 Fourth Street West, Suite 1400; Saint Paul, MN SS10Z
P: 651-266-6715
F: 651-228-3220
christine boulwareCa�ci stoaul mn us
Flu'd?�MLtysa � �^���� ,�
ki2�nFCrsks " �4 € LVIS
Making Saint Paul the Most Livable City in America
�
�
fi1e://C:\Docusnents and Settings\boulwarc\Locai Settings\Temp�YPgrpwise\4B863B4Cmaildpo3l... 2/25/2010
�, � �����oj.
:. .a
Frotn:
To:
�ate:
Ss�b7ec�:
Karen Zacho
Boulware, Christine
3/15/20 10 3:49 PM
189 E 7th Street
Hi Christine-
We do not have a copy of sign permit #OZ-0985Z2, issued in 2002 for the above address as it is nof on the state -
retention schedule to be permanently maintained. There is nnthing in our fiies docup�eatiaa�orovai from the Historic
Preservation Commission. °'�
On May 1, 2009, bSI sent a letter to Phoenix Food & Tobacco requesting a certificate of insurance for their projecting
sign/awning. Due to no response, on June 30. 2d09. YaYa Diatta, zoning inspector, verified the sign/awning had b�
removed. Once a sign has been removed from a property, a business owner must
appfy for a new permiE and meet all code regufations prior to the installation as indicated in the foliowing code seciion:
Section 64, 401(aJ of the Saint Pau! Legislafive Code:
/No person sha/I p/ace, erect o� maintain a srgn, no� sha// a lessee o� ov✓ne� pemrit property under hrs contro! to be
used for such a sign, which does not conform to the following requirements and without first obtaining the requisite
permit fo� such sign.
Any other questions, please !et me knowt.
Karen
Karen Zacho
Zariing "- Cffy of SY Paul �
Deparfinenf of SaFety & Inspections
375 ]acSson Stv Suite 220
St Pau/, MN SSZ OZ
Tel; 651.266.90&4
Fax: 65i366.9124
emarl: karen.zacHo(�cr.stoau/.mn.us
r 1
�
`�
. . _ _ - � , � . � � - - . .. _ � � -.
frle://C:�IIocusents and Settings\bouiwarc\Local Settings\Temp�XPgrpwise\4B9E56EEmaildpo3l:.: . 3/26/2010
CF 10-630
Agenda ltem V.l. B.
. CtTY OF SA{NT PAUL
• HER{TAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
FILE NAME: 191 Seventh Street East
DATE OF APPLICATION: February 22, 2010
APPLICANT: Eric Berg, Gapito! Guitars LLG
OWNER: G& S Walsh Properties LLC
DATE OF HEARING: March 25, 2010
HPC SITE/DISTRICT: Individual Site = Walsh Block
CATEGORY: Sign Permit
CLASSIFICATION: Pivotal
STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: Amy Spong
DATE: March 18, 2010
A. SITE DESCRIPTIOIV:
The Walsh Block is a highly ornamented, three-story, red brick commercial building
constructed i� 1_888. The building was designed in the Victorian Romanesque style by one
of St. Paul's leading nineteenth century architects, E.P. Bassford. The siorefronts are stilf
intact, basically unscathed by typical modern commerciaf storefront design. They have
recessed entrances and are made of cast iron, with a single fluted column. 7he windows on
the main fa�ade. are highly ornamented with mofded brick pediments.,
• B. PROPOSED CFIAIVGES:
The applicant is seeking approva{ for a sign permit to install a 2' x 9' straight awning across
the storefront of 189 7 Street E and a 2' x 19' 6" / 2' x 9' L-shaped awning across the
storefront and around the corner of 191 7 Street E. Both awnings,are dome shaped, dark
green in color, and constructed of "Enlighten" fabric. Awnings contain text in an unknown
font, reading CAPITOL GUITARS; two circular business logos; and one graphic image of an
electric guitar. Awnings also have an 8" free-hangi�g valance containing the following �ext in
an unknown font: GUITARS, BASSES, AMPLIFIERS, ACC�SSORIES, LAYAWAY,
LESSONS, REPAIRS, CONSIGNMENT, 651-225-8888, and CAPITOLGUITARS.COM. All
text and images are predominantly white in color. Awnings are placed above the transom
windows and extend to the outermost edge of the pilasters demarking each bay.
C. BACKGf20UF1D:
A similar awning was instalfed in 2002 for a previous business. The packet includes a IetteP
from DS{ explaining that a sign permit was approved but there is no recorcf that an HPC
design review appl+cation was submitted and reviewed at that time. Given zoning
regulafions, if a business vacates a space, the signage must be removed after one year.
There were orders to have the previous awnings removed and zoning stafF verified that they
were.
D. GUIDELIIVE CITATlOfVS:
Preservation Program for the Walsh Block:
• The exterior appearance of the Walsh Block should be preseived in a manner consistent with the
originai design intent. (Tiiis applies to the south and east facades.) Onginal fenestration shoufd be
preserved. Signs and ofher attachments should not conceal archifectura! detai/, cluffer fhe buildrng's
image nor distracf from the unity of the facade, but shou(d be integrated in a manner which
1 ��
CF IO-530
complemenfs the o�ierall design.
Agenda Item V.I. 8.
Lowertown Des�gn Gurdelines: �he.bui(dfig is notf.ocafed wifhin the distrrcf but the district �s across
the street and these gurde(ines are rnc/uded fo show fhe bur(dings across the street fiave simr(ar
guidelines to fol(dw forsignaqe and awnings.) -. .
� wnisegs and Canopies: .
flwrings and canapies should not be used when they canceal richZy cZetaiZed entries and windows. ,4luminum or
plastic awnings should nat be used. Large or garish lettering shouZd not be used on awnings.
8igns and Accessories
Signs should be compatible with the charaeter of the Disirict and blend with tke chctracter of the sbuctuxes on or
near which they are placed. Signs shouZd not conceal architectural detail, clufter the bu.iZding's image, or _
distract frorn the unity of the facade but, rather, shouid camplement the overall design.
,4, li9aterials: -
Sign materials should complement the materials di the related building andlor the adjacent buildings. Surface
design elements should not detract from or conflict with the related structure's age and design in terms of
identifcation,symbol ([ogo), lettering, and related patterns or pictures. Materials used shouZd be the same as
those usedfor signs during the period of the building's consYruction, such as wood, wrought iron, steel, and
metal griZZ work Newer materials such as exiruded aluminum and plastics may not be kppropriate.
B. TYFes: .
The sign type should enhance the building's design and materials. There are a number oftypes ofsigns which
�nay be used: (1) single faced; (2) projecting double faced; (3) three-dimensional; (4) painted wall signs; and
(5) terreporar,� signs. New bitlboards are not permitted in the Lowertown District.
C. Eocatian and Method afAtlachment.•
There should be no sign above the cornice Zine or upperma.stportion of a facade wa11. Signs should not disfigure
ar canceal architectural details. Painted signs rnay be permisszble on glass windows. and doors. The facade
should not be damaged in sign application, except for mere attachment. The method of attachment shoulcl
respect the str-ucture`s architectural integrity and should became an extension of the architecture. Projecting
signs should have a space separaring them from the building. (Protectian of architecture in method of _
attachment shal! be regardecl as a basis for granting variarzce of the normal zoning code prohibition againstguy
wire supports for projech'ng signs.) �
D. Lighting: -
Location of exterior lights skould be appropriate to the structure. -Signs should generally be. lit from an the sife.
There shouZd be no flashing, blinking, moving or varying intensity lighting. Subdued lighfing is preferred. _
$acklit fluorescent or e posed neon are generally inappropriate.
The SecrefaN Qf �1�� Interior's Sfandards €or P.eh�bifitation:
9. A properfy shall be used for iPs hrstoric purpose or be ptaced rn a new use that requires.minimal.
change to the defining charactens6cs of fhe building and r�s siie and environment.
2. The historic character of a propeify shal! be retained and preserved. The removal of historic
materiats or atteration of features and spaces that char�cterize a property shali be avoided.
3. Each property shall be recognized as a physka( record of ifs time, p(ace, and use. Cf�anges that.
create .a fa(se sense of hisfonca/ deve%pment, such as adding conjeciuraf features or
archrtectura! elemerzts fmm other buildings; sha(1 not be undertakeR.
4. Most properties change overrime; those changes that have acqur2d hisforic srgnificance in their
own nght shall be refained and preserved.
5. Distincfive features, frnishes, and construcfion techn,iques or examptes oi craf'csmanship fhat
characterize a property shal! be �reserved.
�
•
•
�
!1
CF 10-630
Agenda ltem V.1. B.
6. Deteriorated historic featu�es shall 6e �epaired rather than �eplaced. Whe�e the seventy of
• deterioration requires �ep(acement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in
design, color, textu�e, and othe� visua! qualitres and, where possible, materials. Replacement of
missing features shail be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictoria! evidence.
7. Chemicai or physical freatments, such as sandblastrng, that cause damage to historic maferia(s
� shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structu�es, if appropriate shall be undertaken using
the gentlest means possible.
8. Signifrcant archeological �esources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. lf such
resou�ces must be distu�bed, mitigation measures sha(� be unde�taken.
9. New addifions, extenor alterafions, or related new construction sha/I not destroy historic matenals
that characterrze the properfy. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be
compatible Yvith the massing, size, sca/e, and archrtectu�al features to protect the histonc integnty
of the property and its environment.
10. New additions and adjacent o� related new const�uction sha// be Lndertaken in such a manner
that if removed in the future, the essential form and infegrity of fhe historic properfy and its
environment would be unimpaired.
R. FIPlDIPlGS:
1. The Waish Block is listed both on the National Register of Historic Places and is
fndividually designated as a St. Paul Heritage Preservation Site.
2. The proposal does not comply with the Preservation Program for the building as the
awnings "clutter(s) the building's image° and "distract(s) from the unrty of the fa�ade."
The installation of wrapping the awning around the corner does not integrate it `Sn a
manner which complements the overaU design."
• 3. Preservation Briefi #44 addresses historic awnings and discusses appropriate design and
detailing of new awnings, "A �ew awning should be compatible with the features and
c(�arecteristics of a historrc building, as wel( as wrt/� neighboring bui/dings, or the historic
dist�icC, if applicable. Historic photographs of simila� neighboring buildings with awnings, can
also be i�elpful in choosing an approp�iate installation. When selecting and installing a new
awning, a number of othe� factors should be considered: shape, scale, massing, placement,
signaqe, and coion ° The virryf fabric, dome shape, fighting from inside and placement are
all details that detract from the architecturai integrity of fhe property.
4. The awntings do not compiy with the guideline which states "Aluminum or plastic awnings
shou(d not be used. Large or garish lette�ing should not be used on awnings." The fabric
is of a plastic and the letfering is large.
5. The awnings do not comply with the guideline which states "Backlrt fluorescent or
exposed neon are generally inappropriate." Lighting should be from the front of the
awning.
6. The placement of the awning does not comply with the guidelines as awnings should be
installed in individual window ope�ings and traditionalfy would not span over more than
one or two storefront bays.
7. As instal{ed and designed, the awnings have a negative impact to the historic landmark.
� -
3
/�
CF 10-530.
Agenda Item V.(. B.
�T��F F2ECE?�7ilRE�4DATE��':
8ased on the fndings stafi recornrriends deniaE af �ne appGcation and the installation of fhe •
���rrtings. The awnings sha(1 be removed wifhin 90 days fram the date ofi the decis'ton.
e�uring that time period, the applicants may work tvith sfafF to ir�sta!! new awnirigs that ar2:
shed shaped, canvas with loose vafances, !it irom ihe front, placed within the storefront
openings and wifh appropriafely scaled signage.
�
�
� �
�.�
f=
• �
�
4
C�
•
� CF 10-630
� �.
� �
� 4
h �{
�
Preservation Brief 44: The Use��f Awnings on Historic Buildings: Repa�Replacement, a...Pag�� ����
• �l`£��r����� ��`����
7et;h.�ica1 �resenta:ign ��;vices
'fhe lJ�e o� A�lrlings
�- r° � . � . �,
... ' . - :: - �;- .
Ch�d ISancil
�
•
» Introduction
»Historical Back4round
»Preserving Existing Historic AwninJc_s
»Snstailing New Awninqs
»Awninq and Canop�Requlation
»Summarv
�'
�:ct!£Jl":c ��? K $2i"YiCB
A NOTE TO WR USERS: The web versions of the Preservation Briefs dif`er somewhat from the pnnted versions.
Many illustrations are new, captions are simphfled, illustrations are typically m color rather than black and white, and
some complex charts have been omitted.
I9'���'Oi�69��9�a"@
A shopkeeper rolls out an aw�ing at the beginning of the workday; a family gathers
under a porch awning on a late summer afternoon. These are familiar and compelling
images of earlier urba� and residential life in America. For two centuries, awnings not
only played an important functional role, they helped define the visual character of our
streetscapes. Yet, compared to historic photographs of downtowns and neighborhoods
with myriad awnings, today's streets often seem plain and colorless.
Throughout their history, awnings
have had great appeal. Alo�g wrth
drapes, curtains, shutters, and blinds
they provided natural climate control
in an age before air conditioning and
tinted glass. By blocking out the sun's
rays while admitting daylight and
allowing air to circulate between
interior and exterior, they were
remarkably eiiiciert ard cost eiieciive.
Awnings permitted window-shopping
on rainy days; they protected show
window displays from fading due to
sunlight. On the primary facade and
near eye level, they were centrai to a
buiiding's appearance. Manufacturers came up with attractive, attention-getting awnings
featuring distinctive stripes, ornate va{ances, and painted lettering and Iogos. With a
http://w�,vw.cr.nps.gov/hps/tps/briefs/brief44.htm 10/6/2005 �(�
Storefront awnings over sidewalks and entrances were typical
features of American streetscapes for much of the 19th and 20th
centuries. Photo of Larimer5treet, �enver, ColoYada, c. 187Q
DenvBr Public Li6rary, Wesfern History Co[lection, x-22058.
Preservauon Brief 44: "I`he Use�f AFV�ings on Flistoric Buildings: Repa'sT Replacement, a... Fag�� Y� J�S��
� �
wide range of color and pattern choices, owners could select an awning that
complemented the building and get both,style and function in a relatively afFbrdable
package.
In recert years, building owners and athers interested in historic buildings have
rediscovered awnings. Local "main street" preservation programs encouragina-and in
some cases funding-rehabilitaiicn work have helped spur che awning's return. Continued
concerns over energy e�ciency have �°� � ;_�, ��:.
also persuaded building owners and ��7'����'�r=: � �,
developers to use awnings to reduce � �� �� �
heat gain, gfare, and cooling costs. F ��
Because awnings were so common ;q, t" �"' � _
- _ �' +��� # . _ .
until t[�e mid-twentietF� century, they � � � '�
are visually appropnate for mzny � �
historic buildings, uniike some other
means of energy conservation.
This Preservation Brief provides
histor�cal background information
about diverse'awning applications in
ihe United States; suggests ways
that historic awnings can best be .
mafntained, repaired, and preserved; and recommends the varying circumstances in
which replacement in kind, or new awning design may be appropriaca for hisioric
buildings.
•
�
�is�ori��! ��c���°�a���f
Rwnings are remarkable 6uilding features that have changed Iittle over the course oi
history. Records dating back to ancient Egypt and Syria make note of woven mats that
shaded market stalls and hames. In the Roman Empire, large retractabie fabric av✓nings
sheitered the seating areas of amphitheatres and stadiums, including the Coliseum: The
Roman poet Lucretius, in 50 B,C., Iikened thunder to the sound thai "linen-awning,
stretched, o'e`r mighty theatres, gives forth at times, a cracKing roar, when much 'tis
beaten about, betwixt the poles and cross-beams." Over the n2xt iwo millennia awnings
appeared ihroughout the world, while the technalogy used in their construction changed
IittEe.
Av+rscss�g� in ��ae ].9�� Cee�tus�
When awnings began to commonly appear on
American storefronts-during the first half of the 19th
century-they were simpie, often improvised and
SL!'f utilitarian assemblies. The bas I��I'C{N�'dt'°
consisted of timber or.cast iron posts set a(ong the
sidewalk zdge and linked by a front cross bar. To
fend supporc to larger instaflations, angked rafrers
linked the front cross bar to thz buiiding facade, The
upper end o; the canvas was connected to the facade
with nails, with grommets and hooks, or by lacing
the canvas io a headrod bolted ta the facede. The
other (projecting) end of the canvas was draped
�
k�:/fcwvw.cr.nps.gov/kgs/tps/brefs/brief44.h�z I O/b/2005 1 �
Awnings were zn ezsy way to dress up and disfinguish homes of
virtua7ly any sfyle. lmage: Otis Amting Fakrics Company 6roch�r�, c.
192�s.
coveriags stretched beEVteen the 6uitding
Preservation Brief 44: The Us�^f Awnings on Historic Buildings: Repat� eplacement, a... Pa�31�f��a
�
facadeandpost-supportedfrontbars. OV2f, or laced to, a front bar with the edge often
Projectingframeworksofexfensionbarswere hanging down to form a va(ance. On ornate
� nof common un.il laterin the cenfury. Photo: �
Second5treei,Philadelphia,c.1841,Printand examples, metal posts were adorned with filigree
PhofoCollection,7heFreeLi6reryof and the tops decorated with spear ends, balls or
an��aaeiPma. other embellishments. On overcast days or when rain
did not threaten, the covering was often rolled up against the building facade; during
the winter months proper maintenance calied for the removal and storage of awnings.
Photographs from the mid-1800s often show the bare framework, suggesting that the
covering was extended onfy when necessary. Canvas duck was the predominanc awning
fabric. A strong, closely woven coiton doth used for centuries to make tents and sai4s,
canvas is a versatile material with a relatively short lifespan compensated for by its low
cost. �
Awnings became a common feature in the years after
the Civil War. Iron plumbing pipe, which was quickly
adapted for awning frames, became widely available
and affordab{e as a result of mid-century
industrialization. It was a natural material for awning
frames, easily bent and threaded together to make a
range of difFerent shapes and sizes. At the same time
the advent of the steamship forced canvas milis and
sail makers to search for new markets. An awning
industry developed offering an array of frame and
fabric options adaptable to both storePronts and
windows.
• �perabie 6awroings. In tne second half of the 19th
century, manufactured operable awnings grew in
popularity. Previously, most awnings had fixed frames-
the primary way to retract the covering vdas to roll it
up the rafters by hand. Operable systems for both
storefront and window awnings had extension arms
that were hinged where they joined the facade. The
arms were lowered to project the awning or raised to retract the awning using simple
rope and pulley arrangements. Because the canvas remained attached to the
framework, retractable awnings aifowed a more ffexibfe approach to shading-
shopkeepers and owners could incrementally adjust the amount of awning coverage
depending upon the weather conditions. When the sun came out from behind clouds, the
awning could be depfoyed with ease. In case of sudden storms, owners couid quickly
retract the awning against the building wall where it was protected from wind gusts.
•
But the early operable awnings had their own
drawbacks. When retracted, the coverings on
eariy operable awnings bunched up against
the building facade where it was still partia4ly
exposed to inclement weather. (In fact,
deterioration was often accelerated as
moisture pooled in the fabric folds.) Aiso, the
retracted fabric often obscured a portion of
the window or door opening and unless it was
folded carefully, presented an unkempt
appearance.
f8oller.4enrnings. Addressing the drawbacks
of the original hinged awning, new roller
http://www.cr.nps.gov/hps/tps/briefslbrief44.htm lOf6/2005 Z�
�urfng the second half of the 19th cert}ury,
iron plumbing pipe became a popular
maferiai for fixed awning frames. Here, a
pipe frame without ifs canvas covef
extends around the corner of a building in
Washington, �.C. Photo: Library of
Congress, Prints and Photographic
Division, LC-USZ62-121160.
A 19th centun/ shoe store in Richmond, Virginia fiad an
oQera6le awniag retracted against the buitding facade.
Hinged extension artns were raised and lowered
Preservatiou Brief A 4: T1xe Us�Awnings on Histonc Buildings: Kep�Replacement, a... Fa�s�,4 ��p
atfovring for an awaing tonfigu2fion easity changed in
r�sponse to we2ther conditions. This photo sfiows how
ihe fabric gafhered and was ezposed to �e elemen�
When retracted - Rart of the reason ro17eY awnings later
@ecame prevaient Photo: Li62ry of Congress, Prints
artd Photogmphic Division, LGUSZ62-9@053. ,
awnings featured a wood or metal cylinder
around which the canvas was stored when
the awninc� wes retracted. When fuliy
retracted, oniy the velance was visibie.-The
rol4er was usuaily boited to a bacfcboard sec
against the buifding and psotected beneath a
wood or gaivanized metaf hood. In some cases it was installed in a recessed box buiit
into the facade. A iong detachable hand{e (ca4Red a"winding brace"), or a gearbox and
crankshaPEattached to the b�i[ding, was used to tum the rofler. Some later mode(s were
aperated by electric motor. Ro[fers, especially those on window awnings, er'ten contained
a spring that helped retract the awning and kept the canvas from sagging excessively.
Mosc 19th century roller awnings had fixed arms that were
similar to those found on the earifer operabte awnings. Tne
arms hinged flush to tfie building when the awning was
rerracted and, with the help of gravity, straightened out aver
the sidewaik wh�n extended. V�fhen a stocefront awning's
projection exceeded its drop by more than a foot, its long
arms were connected to an adlustab[e slide rod rather chan
hinged directfy to Yhe building facade-increasing head room
along.the sidev.�aik.
S6�ap�s and Stripes. An expanded variety oP available
canvas colors; pattems, and valance shapes also appeared
during this period. Some coverings were dyed a solid color;
shades of slate', tan, and green were especiafiy popular.
O_hers had painted stripes on the upper surFace of the
canvas. Awning companies developed a colorful vocabulary of
awning stripes that enhanced the decorative schemes of
buifdings, and in some cases, served as a building's primary
decorative feature.
The ro[ler bar at the fop ot a iixea-
artn awning is cranked to release
fhe fabric. As fhe canvas unfur(s
Lhe verticaf arms swing dovmward
from fhefr Iower point Because fhe
pichcred awning had a large
prnyectioq e�cfending far from fhe
buifding watl, the Iower hinges
Were mounted on vertical slide
rods affIXed to the facade. When
the awning is lowered, the 6ofTOm
hinges of the arms travels vp fhe
stide rod to increase headroom
beneath thefuity extended awning.
Phofo: NPS files.
s�mp y
provide shelter from rain aad sun. Homeowners found
that the new generation of awnings could enhance
exterior paint schemes and increase the 'visuai appeal
of tl�eir homes._
The broader choice of frame
and canvas optidns
encouraged the
reassessment of awnings
t as a means to
Manu�acturers develooed new awtting shapes, �olors;
.AwideselecfionofstripedpatternsrooKme patcerns and hardware to Flt difFerent house, door,,
awsting begond its originai, utili.arizn
{unc5on Yo serve zs a decora6ve and window and porch stySes. They were an affordab e,
aFpea[ingbuildingEeature.Photo:Li uick and sim le improvement. They afso proved io be
Congmss, Prin� and Phafogmphic Divisfon, Q p �
LGD�;�-62u72. oil Ed>}� TicdtlS Gf Ca'a�Ui"iliG OUtSl�ic' S�aCe.
Homeowners could use a�rning-covered balconies,
posches and patios a� �ny time oi day� arocery stores were able to convert sidewalKs to
outdoor disp(ay areas protected from suniight and quick_ changes in thz weather. On
�izin Street, businzsses used the expanded repertoire of awnings to draw aitention to
their buildings wich bright colors, whimsical stripe patterns and exotic scaltops. Avdnings
increasingly functioned as signs iaencifying the proprietor's name, goods on ofier, or
year of establishment. IC was a trend that wouid cu(minate over a ceniury later with
av:ming insta(lations in whYCh shefter t�ras secondary to advertiszmer,t..
.
•
C�
' 16/6/Z005 2 t
http://wFrw.cr.ngs.govihps/tpslbriefs/t�riei44.hsm _
Preservation Brief 44: The Us,e�^fAwnings on Historic Buildings: Repa�Replacement, a...Pa�,e"�5 p� �p
�=
•
•
Awnings in the 20th Century
Awning developmeni during the eariy twentieth century
focused on improving operability. Variations in roller awnings
addressed the need to provide an increasingly customized
product that accomodated a wide range of siorzfront
configurations and styles.
New iolding-arm awnings appeared that operated either
vertically or horizontally supplementing the fixed-arm awnings
developetJ in the latter 19th century. Vertical folding arms
were made up of smaller hinged arms that crossed like
scissors. Operated by gravity the arms extended outward
pulling the covering off the rolier. Like a fixed-arm awni�g,
the pitch of a scissors-type awning varied depending on
whether it was fufly or only partially extended.
ScissoY artn awnings have a pair
of vertical, hinged arms on eifher
sideoftheassemblysupporting Somewhat different was the "lateral arm
thefrontbar.Tounfuritheawning, aW�IfIJ a horizontally operating awning
therolleriscrankedandthearms thatworked like a human elbowwith the
extend outwartl pulling the cover
awayfromtherol4ecPhoto:NPS spring action in the arms pushing outward
nies. toward the street, unfurling the cover from
the roiler and maintaining tension. Lateral arm awnings featured a
shaflow drop that remained relatively constant regardless of how far
the arms were extended Scissor arm awnings have a pair of vertical,
hinged arms on either side of the assembly supporting the front bar.
To unfurl the awning, the roller is cranked and the arms extend
outward puiling the cover away from the roller. Operable awnings,
whether fixed arm, scissors arm, or lateral arm, rapidly gai�ed
popularity as customers came to appreciate the flexibility, concealed
appearance, and longer �ifespan made possible by roller units.
Lateral-arm awnings
were preferzed on long
elevations, especiaily
those with sheet giass
(where vertical artns
could not tie fastened
iHew Coverin s. Slower to chan e was the fabric used to cover tothebuildingfa�ade).
9 �g When lateral arm
awnings. Canvas duck remained the common awning fabric during awningswereinstalled
the first half of the twentieth century. However, its tendency to across a broad
storefront or porch,
stretch and fade, and its susceptability to mildew, and flammable manufacturers
materials like cigarettes and matches motivated the awning industry theacrosadedspacing
to search for alternatives. Shortly after World War II, a vinyl plastic approximatety eight
coating that increased fade and water resistance was first applied to foot intervais. Photo:
the canvas. Sy the 1960s, vmyl resins, acrylic fibers and polyester NPS files.
materials were all being used to provide a longer-lasting awning cover. Ironically, just
when these innovations promised more durable awnings, the fabric awning industry felt
the debilitating impact of changing architectural fashion, the widespread adoption of air
conditioning, and the increasing availability of aluminum awnings.
�
Modernism dominated commercial architecture durina the postwar era. The style's
signature form-austere stee{, glass, and concrete boxes-had littfe use for fabric awnings.
Colorful awnings seemed old-fashioned, an unwanted distraction from the smooth lines
of the machine aesthetic. The preference, instead, was for perforated structural screens
or brises-soleil (French: "breaks the sun") that integrated shading functions with riew
building forms. It was assumed that new buildings had no need for awnings. Widely
avaiiabie for the first time, mechanical air conditioning threatened to make the awning
an unnecessary vestige of an earlier era. Awning companies fought back with arguments
that traditional shading systems could reduce the required size and investment in air
http://www. cr.nps. gov/hps/tps/briefs/brief44.htm
10/b/2005 ��i
i reservation Briei 44: The Us�Awn?ngs on �Tistoric Buildings: Rep�Keplacement, a... Pag� qfp1�30
conditioning systems. Though canvas awnings continued to be used or, contemporary
bui(dings, new types were oP�en selecc°d to do che job, afuminum and fiberglass
avanings.
Widefy available by the 195Qs, aiuminum awnings were touted as Ionger-!asting and
fower-maintenance than traditionaE awnings. Though used en small-scale commercial
structures, they were especially popular �rrith homeowners. Aluminum awnings were
made with s(ats ca((ed "pans" arranged horizontaily or vertically. For variety and to
match the building to which they werz applied, difr'erent caored siats cou(d be arranged
to create stripes or ofher decorative patterns. Whife afuminum awnings were usually.
fixed, in the I96Qs several operable rofler awnings were developed, induding one with
the trade name Ftexafum Rofl-Up.
A[so during this period, manufac�ured flat-
metal canopies were an increasingly popular
feature, used in new commercial constructio�
and when remodefing existing storefronts.
They were particuiarly common in the Sou±h
where shading was critical to the comfort of
bath window shopRers and score inieriors.
Often�made of aluminum, the canopies couid
stretch across a single facade, or be
connected to extend along an entire block.
spring-loadetlrollerintofhefrontbacPhoto:NPSfiL= �y�� ����es. A� increasing reliance upon
fixed aluminum frames and plastic coverings,
spurred the development of new awning shapes during the 1970s and 1980s. Often, the
awning served as a business's primary s'rgn. Mansard atrvnings, concave awn'tny"s,
quarter-round awnings, and quarter-rounds wiih rounded dame ends appeared with
increasing frequency. Most had vinyl or other plas[ic coverings that were touted as being
more resilient than traditional materials. Featuring bold lettering and colors that were
often emphasized by illuminating the awnings from within, these awnings were common
on new commercial strips and were even popular inside enclosed shopping centers and
food ccurts. They were afso applied, less successfully, to older or historic buildings
where their shape, size, and mateeial bore little resemblance tv traditional awnings.
Aichough ihe 1950s and 196�s saw the end of �he canvas awning's ubiquiiy on Main
Street, it remained a moderately popular fieature of residential architecture, New
materials and technologies such as lateral arm operators, acry[ic febric, and aluminum
kapi the awning relevant to the postwar ranch house and afforded an economical uvay to
update older structures. Colorful awninys helped suburban dwe!fers distinguish their
homes from other, similar, mode[s in the neighborhood.
��r���� ���a�
Teda„ a:vnings mme in a variety ef shapes, s'rzes, frames aad fabr'res. Fixed, G.�arter-
round, back-fit awnings with broad faces featuring company names, Vogos,'ohone
numbers, and street addresses function more as s'tgns thar surtshades. Restaurants and
other commercizf chains use ifluminated awnings with nationa(fy recognized brand
graphics and stripe and color patterns to attract customers along suburban s_rips. The
rriangu[ar shed �rame shape has enjoyed a resurgence af papularity in recent years, in
many cases playin9 off nostalgia for the traciitional awning. Relatively new "stap{e-in"
�wnings wi�h a shed shape are commonly used on new commerciai construction. .This _
system has a_welded frame af e; truded aluminum with a slot on the outer edge. The
•
C�
� J
http:f(www.cr.nps.gov/hps/tps/briefs/brief44.htm I6/6/2005" ��
The years after Wodd War II saw the widespread
adoption of-aluminum awnings on boYh storefrontr and
residences. Opemble aluminum awnings incorporafed a
Preservation Brief 44: The Use-�f Awnings on Historic Buildings: Repai* Repiacement, a... Pag�� ����
� �
.
fabric covering is pulled taut, and the ends are secured in the groove with galvanized
steel staples. A vinyl trim bead covers the groove, protecting the fabric edges and
providing a flush appearance.
Apart from the strip mali, awnings are also reappearing in historic business districts and
residential neighborhoods. In these locations, new awnings typically feature fixed irames
or operating lateral arms-both diiFering little from the awnings of one hundred years
before. Fixed frame awnings have frames made of either aluminum or Iight-gauge
ga�vanized or zinc-coated steel pipes welded together. Frames are secured to bui�ding
facades with clamps, z-shaped clips, and other hardware. Until recently, operable �
awnings found in historic commercial districts were primarily those with historic irames
and hardware that had survived to the present, But new lateral arm awnings with
powder-coated aluminum frames are an increasingly common choice for building owners
who want the convenience of an operable system.
Solutio�-dyed acrylics and acrylio-coated polyester-cotton blended fabncs are often used
to repiicate historic awning coverings. These relatively new materials resemble canvas in
appearance and texture, yet offer greater strength and durability. Because acrylics, are
woven (with the stripes and colors woven directly into the fabric rather than painted on
the surface), they are durable a�d allow light to filter through while keeping heat out.
They dry quickly, there6y reducing damage caused by mildew, and co�tain a UV
inhibitor that further reduces sunlight damage. Poly-cotton fabrics coated with a thin
acrylic iayer that repels dirt and resists abrasion are a{so used. Both acrylic and poly-
cotton fabrics do not stretch or shrink like traditional canvas so they are generally easier
to measure, cut, and instail.
•
��e��^rvsng E�a�tarag Nistos�ac Avvra�rag�
This 1%Os-era dry cleaner has an
afuminum awning that, with its
verticai pattern and alternating
• sfripes, complemenfs the facade's
porcelain enamel panels and
aluminum muliions. The awning
forms an essenYial element of the
building's historic character. Photo:
NPS tiles. �
If awnings already exist on a historic building, they should be
evaluated to determine whether they are appropriate to the
age, style, and scale of the building, using the criteria
identified be4ow. Backlit awnings and dome awnings are
usually inappropriate for 19th century and other historic
buiidings, while aiuminum awnings may be perfectiy
compatible with buildings from the 1950 or 60s. The time is
approaching when some aiuminum awnings may even be
considered appropriate to older buildings, if the awnings
formed part of an updated storefront, or are central features
of an intact postwar refashioning of the building's exterior.
When an existing awn+ng is determined to be appsopriate to
the building, a program of repair and regular maintenance
shouVd be developed. The condition of its covering, hardware,
connections between the hardware and the building, and the
awning's operability sh,ould be evaluated. Hardware such as
arms, rollers, and gearboxes may only need clea�ing and
lubrication. in other cases more substantial repairs by an
awning company familiar with historic hardware may also be
needed.
Awning Repair and Maintenance. The best preservation
http://www.cr.nps.gov/hps/tps/briefs/brief44.him 10/6/2005 �r�
PreservationBrief44'� The IJs�Awuings on Histoxic Buildings: Rep�Repiacement, a...Pag��$ ��_1�5��
practice is to maintain and repair historic features. The proper
care aad mainteRance of existing awnings and canopies w+ll extend the Jife of both -�
h�rdware and covering whi�e ensuring the safety of those passing beneath them. Parts
for historic hardware can sti[f be obtained from some supp[iers, either from existing
stock or as newlymanufactured pieces. In some cases, new marine and boating _
hardware can substitute r'or missing historic awning hardware. Damaged pieces of the
still popular galvanized pipe framss can easily be bent back into shape or, ii necessary,
replaced wi�h virtually identical material.
Ongoing maintenancE`consists of keeping all pivoi points and gears
lubricated and clean of debris. Regular inspections shoufd also
include checking for rust on the frame and hardtn�are, Such areas
should be promp�(y scraped and painted, as rust may disco{or a�d
deteriorate fabric coverings. When awrring hardware is properly
repaired and maintained, its lifespan can be significantly extended.
Exposure to the.elements.and the limited lifespan of even new
acrykic fabrics mean the repair and replacement of ihe covering will
probably occur more frequently than any work o� the frame,or
hardware. The iongevity of any fabric covering is largely dependent
upon where it is installed and how it is cared for. Awnings beneath
overhanging trees, for example, are vulnerable to sap, fruit, and
animal droppings that contain acids, which can deteriorate and
discolor fabrics. Branches, flags, banners or other objects brushing
against an awning can abrade the awning fabric. With proper care
ac.rylic fabrres on fixed awrtings have a service tife of eight to Ffteen
years of year-round exposure.
These flberglass
"clart15fie11" awnings,
although not as old as the
7930s 6uiiding fo wfiich
fhey Were affixed, are
impottant features ffiaf
have acquired
sign�rance. They acere
Re ular cleanin will len then the lifes an of an awnin About ��'nedwhentt�e
9 9 9 P �/ g• building was recently
once a month the covering should be hosed down with clean water. ronaaa��a. Pnoto: Has
Choose a sunny day so thai the fabrEc dries quickly and thoroughly. f
Keep retractable awnings extended untii they dry completely. The awning underside can
be kept clean by brushing 'tt with a household broom. Regular cleaning helps prevent dirt
irom becoming embedded in the fabric. At least twice a year the awning should be
gentfy scrubbed using a soft brush and a mifd, natural soap (not a detergent) and rinsed
wit5 a garden hose. Every two or three years, professional cleaning is recommended.
During this process, ihe covering is usually removed from the building, wash�d, and
treated with an appropriate water repellant solution. Loca! awning companies may offer
this service or the building owner can ship the covering to a speciafty awning cleaning
firm. Qependirg on the frame styie and fiabric, some awnings may be cleaned without
being removed.
N�hile mest fixed awnings remain in place year rou.nd, they l�st longer if taken down at
�ne er�d of the �rrarm weather season. PreferabVy, coverings shouid be removed by an
awning service that can.clean them, restitch seams 'tf necessary, and store them for the
winter. °; oper'} c�vners removing awnirg cnverings themseives need to stcre them in a
dry pface wi'th good �ir circu(ation.
u
�
£� a covering t�egins to sag between cleaninas, the cause (an object on top stretching
tt2e rrtaterial, loose Iaces, a darrcaged seam) musi be addressed as saon as poss'tble.
Nlhen oNher maintenance or repair work is undertaken on the buiiding, it is advisable to •
remove fixed awnings �emporari[y, as �hey are easi(y damaged or stained by materials
dropoed from above.
htC;�://vr�nv.cr.nps_gov/hps/tps/briefs/briei44.ht�n IQ/6/20�5 !��
- �
Preservation Brief 44: The Use�^f Awnings on Histaric Bufldings: Repa�� eplacement, a... Pa�9
Although more durabie than in tlmes past, awning covers can still develop tears and
holes caused by ladders, fal�ing trees, and vandafism. Fabric nearing the end of its
• service life is most vul�erable to tearing along the seams. Though awning companies are
usually called to underEake repafr work, enterprising owners can undertake some work
themselves. If the damage is minor, repair work may be done while the awning remains
in place. Small holes or tears in acrylic coverings can be immediately treated with a hot
needfe or awl that will melt the frayed edges and prevent the damage from spreading.
Patch kits are availabie that function like band-aids, keeping the torn edges together.
These patches, glued or sewn to the fabric, let the awning color show through but do
have a semi-91oss sheen to them. Significant damage requires removing the covering
and, usuaNy, sending it to a sewing shop. There, work may include inserting a patch,
restitching seams, or repfacing an entire fabric panel. If the awning is relatively new it is
possible to obtain a good match between replacement and original material.
r ' - . :.,
Since awning fabrics are subject to weathering and deterioration and hardware is
exposed to the elements, some awnmgs may be beyond repair. Depending on the
circumstances, new awnings may replace deteriorated existing awnings in kind or be
installed where awnings were once in place as seen in pictorial or physical
documentation. Sn other instances, they may be nevvly installed where no awning
previously existed, provided they are compatible with the historic buifding. Whatever the
circumstances, rt is important to seiect an appropriate awning shape, materiai, frame
dimensions, signage (if any), and placement on the facade.
• If the condition of a historically appropriate existing awning
is beyond repair, it should be used as the basis for selecting
a replacement. When a historic awning is missing, owners
shoufd first fook for evidence of a previous awning
instailation. Evidence can be either physica! or documentary.
The existence of surviving hardware-ro{lers and arms,
gearboxes, c{amps and other fasteners-or signs that
hardware was once in place, such as bolt holes or recessed
roller boxes-are the most likeiy forms of physical evidence.
Storefront remodeling projects often uncover concealed and
disused awning hardware that can either be repaired or at
least suggest what type of awning was formerly in place.
This is especially true for awnings that had an operating rod,
gearboxes, and perhaps motors concealed in recesses within �'��
the building wail. Protected from the e{ements, these items �
are likely to survive in repairable condition. Sometimes
physical evidence of earlier awnings can be found in the A9earbox,sliderod,rolleqfrontbar,
and extension arm revea( thaf fhis
basement or upper fioors where hardware and even oid t9th centuryfacadeoncefeatureda
COVcCLi may t7ave be2n stcred a'f'i beiny removed f COiTi ��"��h�kea�+r.ing.Itisli�eSytha;
with minor repairs the survtving
the facade. Clamps, fasteners, and bolt holes in an exterior hardware could again be made
wal� can reveal the position, type and d'imensions of a oPe�bie, recoveretlwithacanvasor
acTylic fabric, and reused to service
missing awning installation. Fittings or other marks on the fhestorefronf Phofo:NPSfiles.
side of the entrance or windows, for example, suggest that a
• fixed-arm awning was present rather than a lateral-arm awning. Gearboxes point to a
retractable rather than a fixed awning.
http://www.cr.nps.gov/hps/tps/briefs/brief44.htm 10/6I2005 ��
Preservation Brief 44: The Use�of Awnings an Historic Buildings: Rep� ReplaceLnen... Page p� ��p
Nistoric photographs and drawings are a primary
documentary resource used to determine an earlier
awning configuration, Photographs have the added
benefit of providing information about the covering, such
as s�rEpe pat�ern, valance type, and [eitering. When aId
pha�ographs indicate that the historic character of a
buifding was defined in part by distinctive awnings, it is
appropriate to insfalf new awnings that repiicate tfieir
appearance. Ii there is evidence that awnings were once
present but no information about their cokar or signage is
available, a color should be selected that is in keeping.
with ihe historic character of the buiiding and district
the ftrst i7oor. Phota; Frances Widmeyar yy�ese no awning
a°a°ek"Kes�°Ke`. currentty ezis�s, and
there is no evidence of a past one, it may still be _
possiSle to add an awning to a historic buildir.g without
aftering distinctive Peatures, damaging histaric fabric or
changing the buiiding's histaric character. A new awning
should be compatible with the features and
characieristics of a historic building, as well as wit�
neighboring buildings, or the hisioric district, iP
applicable. Historic photographs of similar neighbor'tng
buildings with awnings, can also be hefpfuf in choosing
an appropriate instalfation. When selecting and inata[ling
a new awning, a number of oiher factors should be
co�sidered: shape, scale, massing, placement, signage,
and co!or.
Sh�pe. Traditionalfy, both residentiai and
commercial awnings were triangu(ar in section,
usuafly with a vafance hanging down the outside
edge. Early examples of these "shed" awnings had
simple frameworks consisting of pipes or planks
angting out from the building facade and supported
on posts. Early retractable versions continued this
triangular form.
Italianate houses and commercial
rnatching to�s.
New awning shapes appeared in the (ater 19th
century to accommodate.the expanding variety of
door and window configurations. Casement window
awnings were box-[ike in shape to accommodate
ihe oufward swing of the verticai sash. Window
openings with arched tops, such as those found on
buildings were o�ien shaded by awnings with
Generally, �reditional shed awnings are appropriate for most -
historic window, door, and storerronts insiallations. St is
preferabfe.(and in some historic districts, required) that these
awnings have free-hartging valances, the flapping bottom pieces
so characteristic of historic awrings, quarter-round awnings,
modertt m�nsard awnings� and cther contemporary cammerc'ta(
designs with distended,_fixed vafances have no precedent in
http://www.cr.nps.gov/fi�s/tps/brieis/�?ief44.htr.z
�
•
�
1Q/6(2005 ?i�
Simpie shed-type awnings with acrylic or canvas
coverings and Free-hanging valances are -
appropriate for mosf hisforic residences featuring
reciilinearopeniags. Fhofo: PJPS ftes.
Llsing fhe historic photos as a guide (see
phofo, above, ler"E), new awnings wifh a
similar shape and stripe pattem were
insfa(t_d inc%asing tfie comfcrt of
emaloyees and proTecfing county records
from directsuntight. Pfioto; NPS fiies.
1Nhen fhe couhty cler& in Morgan Counfy,
4Vest Urginia vms looking to reduce gfare
in the courthouse o�ces she located a
194�s photo showing sets of awnings on
Pieservation Brief 44: The Use of Awniugs on Historic Buildings: Rep� Replacemen... Pag��'1]�f(��p
�
�
•
weather conditions.
•
traditional awning design and are usually inappropriate for
historic buildings.
Likewise, staple-in systems are not recommended for historic
buildings. One of the distinctive features of a staple-in sysiem is
an exceptionally taut and wrinkle-iree appearance; indeed, this
is a chief appeal qf ihe system when app{ied to new construction.
Historic awnings, however, were either retrectable or built with a
covering laced onto a frame. Both forms had a fair amount of
give in the fabric. Staple systems, especially those with long
valances, usually present an appearance more suited to newer
construction. While �ot recommended for installation on most
historic buildings, they may be appropriate for infill construction
within a historic district.
Scale, hiassing, and
A dome avming was an
inappropriate addition to this
circa 1S90s buildi�g. In order
to quality for historic tax
Placement. Because their creditsthenewvinylawning
was replaced with a shed
primary purpose was functional awningwithacanvas[ike
ratherthan decorative, awnings wovenacryliccoveri�g.Photo:
NPS files.
were traditionally installed only
where necessary. Window awnings were most
commonly found on building efevations with southern
exposures in the northern areas of the United States
and on elevatio�s with both northern and southern
exposures in the southern United States. They were
also found on east and west elevations, and someiimes
just on selective windows. Retractable awnings were
originally more common in northern climates where
awnings required additional protection from extreme
The design of a particular commercial building influenced, the
placement of its awnings. Some storefronts with traditional
glass transoms had the awning p(aced below the transom,
others had the awning installed aliove the transom. On both
commercial and residential buildings, awnings were only wide
enough to cover the window openings that they sheltered; a
single awning rarely covered two or more bays. On storefronts,
they were not higher up on the buifding fasade than was
necessary to shade the entrance and display window. Thus, it is
important when installing new awnings on historic buildings to
ensure that the covering not obscure the building's distinctive
architectural features.
Also, new awning hardware shouid not
be installed in a way that damages
historic materials. Clamps and faster2rs
used to attach awning frames shouid
penetrate mortar�oints ratherthan brick
or other masonry surfaces. If new
These window awnings today
match wfiat would have
appeared in the iSth ceniury.
The fabric is slighfly toose on
the frames, the valances ha�g
freely, each window bay has its
own awning, and the awning
backboards and rollers are i�stafled, care framesaresetwithinthe
openings. Photo: Mike
needs to be taken not to damage .lackson.
cornices or transoms. Finally, awning
piacement, size, and shape must be compatible with the historic
character of the buildi�g..
http://www.cr.nps.gov/iips/fps/briefslbrief44.hfm
10/6/2�05 �. �
Single awnings shouid not 6e set over
more than one door orwindow 6ay. A
separate shed awning with a camas or
acrylic covering woWd be more appropriate
over each of these openings. Photo: NPS
files.
Preservation Brief 44: T1�e L7s�af Awn?ngs on F3istoric Buildings: Rep�, Replacemen..: Page�' ����
� � � � � � � '
ihis postwar aluminum
2wnirtg does rtot contribute to
u'�e chaacter of this 79tfi
century residence and coufd
be replaced during a
rehabili�Eon projecT wifh a
Ybric shed advning more in
�a�eriai. Historically, awnings were covered with canvas that
was eitf�er solid 'rn color or paEnted with stripes:.DUring the
second half of the twentieth century cartvas fell out of favor and
was suoerceded by vim/I ar.d" other synfhetic.textiles. For various
reasons - particularly its reflectivity and texture-vinyl is generally
a,� unsuitable materia! for awnings on histaric buildings. Many
historic revizw commissions note ihe inappropriateness ci vinyl in
their guidelines and cal! for the use cf canvas, canvas b[ends, or
acryiics that resemble canvas.
Weatherresistant acrylic fabrics such as solution-dyed acry[ic
and acrylic-coated polyester-coiton approximate the historic (ook
of canvas coverings, yet afiord a new Ievel of durability, colar-
fastness, and ease of use, quality poly-coiton coverings may be
more appropriaze in some cases because, like traditiona!
awnings, the co;ors ar�d stripes are painted directly on the upper
surface, whife ihe underside remains a pearl gray color,
keeping wiYh fhe building's ������a. In addit:on to
age aad appeardnce. Fhota SFt2l shoppers and
Masr�es. �erchandise, and rzducing glare
and temperatures, awnings on commerciai buildings
ofrer va(uabie advertising space. Photographs from the
mid-19th century sh,ow a wide range of lettering artd
Iogos- business names, types of trade (hosiery shop,
telegraph house}, street numbers-on the sloped
coverings and side flaps of awnings. The most common
placement of a shop proprietor's business name or
service was on the valance hanging down from the
awning edge. The frant valance provided a flat surface
visible whether the awning was retracted aaainst the.
building wall or fully extended. Many establishments;
however, left their awnings unadorned without any lei#ering
Today creating large leitered signs on a new awning as part of a rehabilitation project
requires special care and is not approprlate in all cases. Used long befo�e any Iocal
signage control, historic examples of such lettering often reflected the character of a.
district, with.more upscale retail areas, for 2xample, being more reserved than
wholesale districts. Contemporar�� awning lettering can add visuat interest and
commercial identity but should be desig�ed in !<eeping with che historic character of,a
huilding and its historic district.
�Q!�r. As in the past, variety in awning color is an
appropriate characteristie when reintroducing awnings
in historic districts. Since the 19th century, awnings
have feaiured a range of difr"erent stripe pafterns and
an exrensi:�e co!or pa!eiie. These lively, e��en
whimsical, designs embel;ished builcinq facades tike a
nzcktie or scarf does a suit. The vibrancy they lent to
city scree'ts and neighborhoods is part of ihe history oF
inese environments znd similar results can be acyieved
today as wetl.
r1
�J
•
•
http://wwcv.cr.nps.gov/hps/tps/briefslbrief44.i��n IO/E/2005 ��
Appropriafe lettering, as on this roiler
awning valance, can function as distinctive
signage wifhout detracfing from fhe historic
chamcter of Etie building. Phofo: NPS files.
The green and burgundy stripes that
d�mrate these porch awnings comp�ement
the mafching shutEer and brick facade.
Preservation Brief 44: The Use ofAwnuigs on Historic Buildings: Repair, Replacemen... Pag�lF3 �g��
� �
•
Avvvrqis�g and C��sopy Itegu9ation
Because commercial awnings often extend into the public right-of-way, municipal
building departments usually regulate their use. Regulations specify construction type
(materials and dimensions of framing members, the use of flame retardant fabrics),
minimum height above the sidewalk (usually between seven and ten feet), minimum
distance between the projecting edge and the curb (usuaily between one and two feet),
and maximum projection from the building wall. Such regulations are meant to ensure
that awnings are securely built, do not pose a threat to pedestrians, and are not at risk
from widely-Ioaded trucks. Lettering, color, and the relationship to adjacent awning '
designs may also be subject to building department review and approval.
; -���
�r,; _ ��
�.���,, ,.,��.,�..,��,��...�.�....�
•
�
Local historic district commissions and neighborhood
improvement associafions oHen publish awning guidance on
their websites. Image: Ripon Main Street, Inc.
Awning work on buildings located in
historic districts wilf likely be reviewed by
a historic district commission (HDC).
NDCs may also review grant app4ications
and recommend approvals for facade
improvement programs, where such
programs are in place. Though
commissions look at projects on a case-
by-case basis, many have established
guidelines that address general issues
and local concerns relating to awnings
and canopies.
Often, local design guidelines are modeled
upon The Secretary of the Interro�'s
Standa�ds and Guidelines for
Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. These
standards set forth principles meant to ensure that new elements are added sensitively,
do not damage historic fabric, and are compatible with the histocic character of the
boilding.
�
Like all exterior building features that are subjected to snow, rain, sunlight, wind, and
pollution-awnings need regular attention. Covered even with modern materials, they
require maintenance, repair, and eventually replacement. Awnings are often the first
feature to be altered when historic buildings change owners or uses. 7hey often have a
significant role in contributing to the h'tstoric character of a building. It is important that
owners, architects, engineers, historians, and others consider this when planning work
on a historic building.
�.avni�gs arad the S�sn
• Although their eifectiveness can be affected by many factors including location, climaCe,
window size, and glass type, the energy efficiency advantages of awnings are clear.
According to the Department of Energy, awnings can reduce heat gain up to 65% in
south facing windows and up to 77% on windows facing east. Awnings reduce stress on
http:l/www.cr.nps.govllips(tps(briefslbrief44.htm 10f6/2005 � �
PreservationBrief 44: I'he Use�oi Awnings on F�istoiic Buildings: Rep� Replacemen... Page ���
existing air conditio.ning syst°ms, and make it possible to instal! new HVAC systems with
smalfer capacity, thus saving purchasirg and operating costs. Air conciitioners need 'co •
work less hard, less aiten. When used with air conditioners, av�mings can lower tl�e cost
ef coo[ing a buiiding by up to 25%.*
F,wnings offer a nurr�ber of benefits to ownars or' nisEeric buildings. Awnings can make
unnecessary a host of other alterations made to bui{dirrgs in the name of energy
efFiciency. Awnings provide nearly comparabfe glare reduction and reduced heat-gain as
Linted windows or wihdow flms, yet are 'in �ceeping with the hiscoric appea2nce of a
bui{ding facade. They help protect historic windows and storefronts, and allow windows
to renain open, and cool air to circufate, even during inclement weather. In warm --
c!imates, chey reduce the need to replace existing windows with rew units with
insufatirg g(ass for the purpos2 of erergy co�servation.
���a�E�s� ��r�a�a� a�d �a��m� V'�'�� �S
In some commercial districts, Ioczl "main street" associations, chambers of commerce,
or business improvement district ofFices offer assistance far awning rehabilitation
projects. Such organizations may sporsor grant programs or Io�N-interest (oan programs
with funds that can 6e used for awning work. These initiatives, often bundled with
facade improvement and signage proyrams, enhance the visua( character of a street or
neighborhood, encaurage conformance with guideiines, and offset what is in some cases
the higher cost nf a historicat(y appropriate instatfation. When a. building is Iocated within
a historic district, additional grants, loans and tax incentives may exist. The availability
af funding assistance, in these cases, is usuafly contingent upon completing
rehabilitation work in keeping with estabiished preservation practices.
�e���,���$ ��@
American Society of Heating, Refriaerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Handbook
Chapt2r 30: Fenestration, Atfanta: ASHRAE, Z001.
�"Awnings Back in Sty(e," Traditional Buifding, January/�ebruary 19°7, 7fi.
ChandEer, Emest, Atimings and Tents Canstruction and Design, New York: Ernest
Chandler,-1914,
"Fusion af dId and New," Fabrics and Archit°cture, S°ptember/October 19S4, 42-45.
Muckenfuss, Laura A, and Fisher, Charies E., Preservation T2ch Noie, "Wirtdows Nunber
7, Wirdow Awnings" Washington, D.C.: National Park Service, U.S. Departmeni of the
Tnterior, and Georgia lnsCitute ofTechnology, 1984.
f�orent,erg, Steve, "Awnings Through �he Ages," Industrial Fabric °raducts RevieN�,
September 1993.
U.S. Department of cnergy, Cooling Your Home Naturatly, Oiiice or Energy Eff[ciency ard
Renewabfe Energy Factsheet, DOE/CHICOS3-22Z, October 199�.
•
?Nhite, Anthony G. Awnings, Canopies and Marquees: .4 Selected Bibliography� Vance .
Bib(iographies, Architec�ure Series:�Bibltography TA, 1986.
�c�C€a��av����� €����s
htCg://www.cr.aps.gov/hps/fps/hriefs/brief44.htn � 10/6/2005 � �
PzeservaiionBrief44: The Use ofAwnings on Historic Buildings: Repair, Replacemen... Page�FS Q�_��
�' �
•
r1
�
CE€ed Ra;:dl is an Archr�eccural Historian wi�h Technical Preserva�ion Services, Heritage
Preservaiion Services Division, Nationzl Cen�er �or Cuitural Resources, Nacicnal Par;c
Service in �^•:ashington, D.C.
The au_hcr wishe=_ to thzn'e zhe iol(ovJng for th�ir assiscance in ihe preparation and
re��iew of ihis orie�. Scotc Massey of P.wring Cleaning induscr;zs; Wal:er �. Conine oi
)ohn Boyie & Company; inc.; Jacob i. Luker o` Muskegcn Awning; Steve Morenberg of
Reeves Brothers, Ir,c.; Karen �iusech oi the Indus�naf Fabrics Associa[ion internatror,a!;
Rober Mon�gcmery of Nontgomery SFade & Awning, Ltd.; Michelle Capel; of tne Asiru�
Company; Bruce N. Wr'rghi of Fabric Architeccure; Linco{n H, Chrisiensen of anchor
?ndustries, Inc.; Mike Jackson, FA?A, of ihe Iflinois Histonc Preszrvation Agency;
Stephen Stowell of the Lowell Historic Board; Sharon C. Park, FAIA, Micha2l ]. Auer, Key
D. Weeks, Anne Grimmer, L�uren Van Damm°, and Charles E. Fisner of HeritUge
Freservation Serv;ces, Naiional Park Service.
�s°cat�t crsve� itnag�: �.r�ctss; snd�strEe�, Ine.
This publica�ion has been prepared pursuant co the National Historic Preservation Act, as
amended, which directs the Secretary of the Inter:or to develop and make available
information concerning historic properties. Comments about this publication shoufd he
directed`to: Charles Fisher, Technical Publications Program Manager, Technical
Preservation Services, National Park Service (Org. 2Z55), 1849 C Str2et, NW,
Washington, DC 20240. This publicaiion is not copyrighted and can be reproduced
wi'thout penalty. iVormal procedures for credit to the author and the National °ark
Service are appreciated. Unless otherwise indicated, photographs are irom NPS files.
Excepting NPS photos, the photographs used in this publication may not be used to
iliustrate other publications without permission of the owners.
TSSN: 0885-7016 Apri{ 20�5 U.S, Government Printing Off'tce: 2064 d24-005-012Z2-Z
Technical Preservation Services � Order Brief � Preservation Brieis � Search �
guestions/Answers
KD W
5/17/OS
� �
�a�,eaa'��� SertPce
Pnvacv & Disdaimer
•
h�tp://www.cr.nps.gov/hps/tns/brieis/brief44.ht�n 10(6(2005 3 �
� � "����� � �,� a
SaintPaulHeruage Preservatian Camirzu�sion
• _ Depc�imcmt af Safety and Znspections
37� Jwlrran S1rzet, Suite 120
G SaintPaul,1✓IN55 7 0 7-1806
n� Phone.� ,/65I) 266-9078
�RITr�G� i'�S�R�A`TI�i�T ��I�I�SSI(3N
DE�I�N REV1�V6' A���IC��'IOI�
Tnis application must ba completed 'm addition to the aporopriate city pe�nii applicaiiar, ii the a�'ected
propetTy is an individually desi�ated landm�k or located w$hin an historic district For applicadons that
nust be reviewed by ffie Heritage Preservation Commission refer to the HPC Meetina schedule for meeting
darss and deadIines.
_ .. . _ . . ._ ._ . .. . .. . . ... .. . :. . .. . . - -
_. _
1. -CATEGOI�� �
Ptease check the category that be,st describes tBte proposed work
❑ Repair/RehabiTitafion j�KSigu/Awning ❑ New Constructian/Addition/
❑ Moving ❑ Fence/Itetaining Wa11 Alteration
❑ Demolition ❑ Qther ❑ Pre-Application Review Only
•
•
Street aad number: 1 �
3. APPLICi4ItiT Il�'FY?I81VIA
`����� �- Zip Code: `�SIO (
I3ameofcontactperson: ��L ��-�-
Company: C APi�c, G u t�{j' !._.d_ L
Stseet and number: ( Gl I
Cify: �'J`t' Qft17 �.- State: M IJ 'Lip Code: 5� i O 1
Phonenusnber: S( 2 e-mail: c�-iG� «Pr'�o�Cs����.Lo%-'�
4. PROPERTI' O�'VNEA(S} I�TF'OT2NJATIQN'(If different feom apQIicant)
Name: G 'T S w�-5 N d'F-oP�-t �E �--�- L
S�eetandnumber: ,5 J (-1 ��Dt>� D(L,
Ciiy: St����� State: ��.,/ ZipCode: �s�a'� _
Phone number: 051 aa`S - �{'3 t� e-mai1:
0
�3
�
�
�
Cotttactperson: N(A -
Compzuy: _
Street an_d number:
CitS�: State: Zip Code:
Phone aiunbez: (_� e maiS:
• G. PI20�EC3':I9�SCR�PTiOI�I , - - .
Comptete�y �eseribe AT�, e�erdor changes being gmposad for tke property. Iuc[u�e
e�anges to xrc€�itea:ti€ra[ deiails such as windows, doors, sidina, rai€iags, steps, triw, raof,
faciudatioce ar �ore�es. Attae�h spc�ea&eatia[cs for dcors, �indoavs, Ligh#ing and ot3�sr
features, if agg€icaoie, iucI�cdiag color a�€d material samgis.
�£!}��--t' NC3 c��' Ext�j f1t7-����t {{z1JNf1�6S 4bt��
��f�f �Vzo: �t'�Aov'�b E�a�`r— �x"t��- �':�i�-1?vUL-
4'��,,, ; tN tz" .
CF 10-630
.
�
Attaeh additiannl sheets if neeessary I
)
- ,. - . . _.. _ . ..
7. A'�'T`A�IIlF�IO'TS
Refer to tlie Design Review Process sheet for required information or attachments.
*xIl�'�E�'1Y1�PLET� ?�'P�.IC9TrtC)AF� �+7Si<1L BE F�+3TJILR'���*
AP�: Z'ff�+ N�C�+ SSe°�Rg' AiTAC.`�f1�i'L+"l�"T5 A1�T� i1�'i3ILt�IL4��P� dPdCLd113�D?
,
�i s'ES
Wi[I aay federal money be used in this project?
�^,rz yau app2yir g for the Znvestment Tzx Credi�s?
1'E� 1°IQ X
uE� . � 1Y� h
•
2
� [
� �, CF 10-630
I the undersi�ned, understaad f�af the Desi� Review Applicarion is limited to the aforementioned work to
• ihe affecTed prop�iy. I fiuther understand that any a�itional e�er�or work io be done under my
ovmership must be sebzritted by applicaGOn tn the St. Pzul Herirag° Preservation Commission. Any
unauthorized work witl be rzau¢�d to be removed.
Signature of applir�nt:
Date: !'�'�����
Signature of owner:
Date reeeived. L �� ,� �� ' �
D1strl�tt %Tntl�t Ldual Site
.. _ -_ „' �.%
lype ofwork:7VlinozJ
��
�:<�
•
r 1
L J
Bate:
� � " �t2Q� .U7 � �.�� c�Gt ,�� - ' '_ .- .
� ! 6 � lra�vi � �O �iz� r�� ��� �:G.� �
_. ������
��► �
6b �5- tJ� . . .
� ',.-
a �PPartaveJ ,,.: . �
�_, _ `
�r" .. ,
� Reqnires Commission review
Sa�mitied:_ : . _
a ;.3 '�`eCS"of;Ylans
o` " 1 Sei of Plans reduced to 8%"' �
b y_ 1"1 or �11''�by I7' _
'.: �`7'hotbgaplas . ' � �
��C�ty Peimits�p�i�ca�on -
,,.
�.;.-,�..:,, , l�caYiba `-_�. : --- -� ,:. �
�:�aPF� � �
HearingID'ate,setfor: �J ' � < 0.�.
Ciry Pe�miY # � � - � � C,, � 2 (�
3
�J
_ Recpv�ires staff rea�iew
CF 10-630
•
6"
v �
� J
� �
� 7
� �
2 � i�1
? .S 2
� � �
� �P �J
� �
� � � !
� �r
m a M .
g •
�"
�
��
J+ =
� �'S
�
•
3�
CF 10-630
UNAPPROVED EXCERPT
SIJMMIIRY NIINUTE5 OF THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMNIISSTON
. CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Lower Level — Room 40, City-HalUCourt House, 15 West Kellagg Boulevard
March 25, 2010 ,
Present: Robert Ferguson, Jennifer Haskamp, Pat Igo, Rich Laffin, 7ohn Manning, David
Riehle, Steve Trimble, Diane Trout-Oertel
Absent: Sherry Enzler (unexcused), April Haas (excused), Matt Mazanec (excused),
Lee Meyer (excused), Mazk Thomas (excused) _
Staff Present: Azny Spong, Christine Boulwaze, Michelle Wood
PUBLIC HEARING
CALL TO ORDER: 5:05 PYI by John Manning (Chair)
I. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA — Laffm, Igo (8-0)
TI. CO�iTFLICTS OF INTEREST — Agenda Item VI.D. — Ferguson & Nianning
III. CHAIR'S ANNOiJNCEMENTS — Appoint a commissioner to sit on the Public Art
Saint Paul Stewardship Committee. Commissioner Laffm volunteered. 'I`hey will meet
Wednesday, March 31 at 10:30am. ,
IV. S"F'AF'F ANNOUNCEMEIVTS —l�ew meeting room set up and equipment. The new
. microphones are very sensitive. Anyone presenting to tlie commission or giving
testanony shouid sign in at the front desk or at the podium.
V. I�T�W �USZI�ESS/I335CU�S�Ol�T
A. Phalen Park Arch Bridge Rehabflitation — presentation by Scott Nesvold, Olson &
Nesvold Engineers, P.S.C.
The bridge has been determined eligible far the National Register of Historic Places. The
work that is proposed will require an Army Corp of Engineers permit and that will kick in
the Section 106 process. MacDonald and Mack, Mead & Hunt and TKDA have been
working on this project along with Olson & Nesvold Engineers.
A presentation on the bridge condition and proposed renovation/reconstruction was
shown. Commissioner Trimble questioned why the design was not going back to the
oziginal 1910 design, but the 1934 WPA design. The WPA design has been on the bridge
longer and is best associated with it. The decking on the bridge wiil be lowered so that
the rail height from the inside will be 42 inches. Commissioner Laffin had comments
about avoiding future spa�ling. Nesvold explained the new approach panels would move
the water further from the bridge. Trimble stated he would have liked to see both designs
for the bridge project.
VI. PERMIT REVIEWlPUBI.IC gIEARINGIA�+TER-THE-FACT REVIEW
A. 325 Laurel Avenue, Hi11 Historic District, by Saint Paul Public Housing Authority,
for a building permit to instali solar panels on the roo£ File #10-014 (Boulwaze, 266-
6715).
• Staff presented the report recommending denial of the application. Al Hesfer was present
to testify along with other SPPHA staff. He acknowledged the challenge between energy
efficiency and the built environsnent. He stafed they received a 3 million dollas stunulus
1
3�°°
CF 10-630
grant and that solar e�ergp would augment fbe boiiers at the site. Cammissioner Trimbte
asked why the SPPHA did not discuss the projectwiih HPC staff earlier in the pzocess
since they Iaiew it was in a hisforic district. Hester siated that he wished they had,-but
had to move quickly to meet the deadline. A resident, Iv1ary Ann, tesfified that emissions
have an affect on the historic district.
"F'he public hearing ivas closed. Commissioner Riehle mo�ioned to approve the
application as proposed. Commissioner Laffrn seconded tha motion. Commissioner
Trimbte offered an amendmentlo add screening on the north side of the roof. The
amendment was not accepted by Cominissioner Riehle citing that screening the so1aT
panels wiil not alter the overall negative impact of tke building on the historic dist�icT,
Trimble off�red the amendmant that the owner/applicant eaplore screer,ing of the solaz
panels on the north end of the roof to blend with the btiilding. The amendment was
approved 7-1 (Riehie). Chair Manning �ated this is the first of the solar panel
installation requests with HPC wi11 review. Coauxiissioner Trout-Oertel asked if the
panels could be relocated to have less impact. Com,-nissioner Laffin replied they cannot
be stacked on the east wzng. The motion passed as amended 7-1 (Igo). Coxnmissioner
Igo stated the solaz panels wi11 have a tremendous visual impact on the historic district. -
�. i41 S�ventT� Siree� �ast, Individual Site —�Jalsh Block by Capitol Guitars, for a
sign parmzt to install awnings. Wark was coznpleted without HPC review or a sign
permit. 1�a�e #10-0�5 (Boulware; 266-5715).
Staff preseneed the report recoaimending deaial of the app&catiott. Eric Berg and Bill
Bergeron, owners, were present to testify. They sYated they did not intend to circumvent
the system and that their contractor did not get the pernut to do the work. They stated
that the landtord had removed the awnings and thought they coUld just reinstall them.
The applicants added that they invested $2500 to install the awnings and that new
awnings would cost them $3500. Mr. Berg showed examples of awnings in Lowertown
and downtown to the HI'C. Commissioner Laffin stated he sympathized wit7i the expense
and offered the example of the pmcess that Golden's Defi had gone tbrough after
instaliing awnings without a pernut or HPC approvat. Chair Manning stated the -"
applicants may have some issue with the property owner and sign company.
Commissioner Riehle commended the applicants for coming to the HPC and iheir .-
research and added that the sign company shovld be responsible, as they did not receive
approval for their work.
Rzchel Westermeper owner of 1935 Summit Avenue, tesfified that she has awnings on
her home and worked with her company and the HPC. Ms. Westermeqer suggested the _
applicant work with a company that could superunpose an appropriate awning design on
plans for HPC review.
`I'he public heazing was closed. Caasamissnor�er Trout-Oertel snot�on�d for de�aa3 of
khe application based on staff recoffimendations. Commissaoffier �ergusoa seea�zde�
t�e �aotaon. Commissioner Laffin commented on the color of the awning and suggested
the Capitol Guitaz iogo oa the T=Shirt as an appropriate Iogo for their awningslsignage.
�emu^ussiener Trimble suggested sending a let*.er te the a��uing compar!y rega.rding the
violafion and Comsnissioner Igo stated that the property owner has some responsibility in
this matter.. Tise motzon to deny passed 8-fE.
� �. 2'�3 �ates Avers�e, Dayton's $luff Historic Dismct, by GlobaI Systems Inc, far a
bnilding peimit to add a dormer/egress and ne.w stairs and landings to the west eleuatian
af the building. �ite #10-Q16 (Boulware, 266-6715). I,aad over.
•
.
•
, 3�
CF 10-630
•
�.tl k �F' .Sn��V2 iliV�.
Christopher B. Coleman, Mmjor
�farch 26, Z010
DEP,�RT�IRENT OF PI.Ai�fiv'fiiG &
ECONOM.IC ➢EV cJ]FMe!vT
Cecile Bedor. ��rec:ar
25 West Fossrch Street
SaiatPauL HO: 55iQi
__
lelephoree 65i-26n-670G
FacsrmlLe.' 6�l-22d-3210
Eric Berg
Capitol Guitars LLC
`. �41 Seventh�tre�T�t
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Re: 191 Seventh Sh�eetEast, Walsh B1ock=Individual Designated Site
March 25, 201Q - Agenda Ftem VI.B., HPC File #1Q-Q15 (After-the-Fact RevSew}
Dear Mr. Berg:
As you know,ithe Heritage Preservation Commission: (HPC) considered at its March 25, 2010 meeting
• your application for a sign permit to insiaP, arvffi¢gs at the properiy listed above, Awnings were installed
w;thout a permit or HPC review. The HI'C voted 8— 0 to denyyour application. This decision was
based on the discussion at the puhiic hearing, puhEie testimony and fmdings by HPC stafF.
You or any aggrieved parry ftas the right to appeal the Heritage Preservation Commissian's decision to the
Sai��t Paul City Council under Chapter 73 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. Such an appeal must be
filed within I4 days of the date of the HPC's order and decision. Chapter 73 states:
(h) Appeal io city council. ,The permit applicant or atzy party aggrieved by the decision of the heritage
presernation commissron shall, within fourteen (14J days of the d¢te of the heritage presernalion commission`s
, order and decision, have a Yight to appeal such arder arut decision ro the ciry eouncii. The appeal sha(I be
deemed perfected upon recetpt 6y ihe drvision ofp[anning ofirvo (2) capfes ofa rzatice ofappeal and statement
set�ing forth ihe graunds for tfie aPpeal. 77re divi.�ion of plannirtg shall transmit one copy of the notice af
appeal and ssafement io ihe-city corxncil and one copy ta fhe heritage preservation commissian. The
commission, rn any writCen order detryittg a per..mit appfic¢tion, shatl adr�ise ?he epplicarrt of the right ?e appeal
to the ciry council and inc&+de this paragraph in all such orders.
.
Please feel freato caIl staff at 651-266-9078 to discuss creating an applica6on for awnings and/or '
signage at your business that wouid camply Euith the preservation program for the building and could be
reviewed a.dm�nistrativety.
Sincerely,
$ ° -
�
Christine Boulware
Historic Preservation Ptanner
cc; Karen Zacho, ASI
G& S W aish Properties LLC, acvner
File
AN AFFIRMATSVE ACTS02�3 EQUAL OPP4ItTUN1TY EMPLOYER
�J' J
CF 10-630
May 5, 2010
Amy Spong
Historic Preservation Specialist
Department of Planning and Economic Development,
City of Saint Paui
Heritage Preservation Commission
1400 City Hall Annex
25 West Fourth Street
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Dear Ms. Spong •
My wife Nancy and I moved from our 1887 condo on Ramsey Hili to one in Wacouta Commons
5 years ago and I been active in the neighborhood since that time, I am currently serving my
second term on the Capital River Council.
The Mayor's office has been working to expand on the recent successes of Lowertown as the
perfect time for expanding the North Quadrant to the vigorous Wacouta neighborhood. Greg
Miller has tumed 500 Jackson Street into the headquarters of Interstate Partners. Greg has
covered the old yellow block building with warm brickwork and has capped it off with a roof top
garden and patio. And Aeon, which converted the Crane-Ordway building into housing, will
begin tuming the Renaissance Box in to 65 units of affordable housing this summer.
More excating yet is the addition the Capitol Guitar shop where failed groceries used to be the
location for open drug-buys under their yellow awnings. The historic Walsh Block building has a
far greater problem and concern for citizens with its inhabitant than it does with the look of its
awning. I believe the entire neighborhood views it as an improvement and i for one support Eric
Berg and welcome him in to the neighborhood.
His retail success is an important part of building our urban community and I support the awning
as it exits.
Best regards
j �"G� � /�'rx'$'°"_._""---
Mark Karason
490 Temperance Street #301
CF 10-630
Page 1 of 1
Amy Spong - File # 10-015
�
From: JAnde2428 <jandef2428@aol.com>
To: <amy.spong@ci.stpaul.mn.us>, <spong@cistpaul.mn.us>
Date: 5/5f20101:29 PM
Subject: File#10-015
Amy,
I live at 209 8th street east, and would just like to say the improvements to the building and the new awning look
very nice. I am glad we have a new business in this location that cares about their image.
Sincerely,
Jordan Anderson
President
Midway Uniform
file:NC:lDocuments and Settings\spongamylLocal Settings\TemplXPgrpwise\4BE172A8ma... 5/5(2010
CF 10-630
Page I of 1
Amy Spong - Re: File 10-015 sign on Walsh building
From: <gmarsha11519@aol.com>
To: <Amy.Spong@ci.stpaul.mn.us>
Date: 5/3/2410 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: File 10-015 sign on Walsh building
Dear Amy Sprong, Thank you for the nice letfer. You are absolutly correct in everything you said.and the young
men were wrong .I just hope the HPC can give them some time to correct their signage until their business is a
littie more established in that location. The Walsh building is a lovely building. Thank you G Marshall
---Original Message-----
From: Amy Spong <Amy.Spong@ci.stpaul.mn.us>
To: gmarshaN519@aol.com
Sent: Mon, May 3, 2010 10:32 am
Subject: Re: File 10-015 sign on Walsh building
Dear Gretchen,
Thank you for your testimony. It will be included with paperv✓ork and forwarded to the City Councit. The frst
Public Hearing was held by the Heritage Preservatian Commission because the building is a designated
Landmark in St. Paul. The role of the HPC was to determine if the awnings put up camplied with historic design
�eview guidelines. The decision made was less about the fact that it was done without proper approvals and
more about the historic design review guidelines in place for designated historic properties. The properties that
you refer to on 10th and Jackson are not locally designated by the City Council for historic preservation. The City
Council will hear this matter on Wednesday, May 5 where your testimo�y will 6e lncluded. I've included the HPC
staff report and decision letter for your reference.
Thank you, Amy Spong
Amy Spong
Historic Preservation Specialist
Department of Planning and Economic Development,
City of Saint Paul �
Heritage P�eservation Commission
1400 City Hall Annex
25 West Fourth Street
Saint Paui, MN 55102
(651) 266-9078 main
(651) 266-6714 direct
»> <gmarshall519@aol com> 5/2/2010 2:07 PM »>
i have lived in the 9th street lofts for almost 6 years. I support the young men that opened the guitar shop. Their
sign would not be my first choice but they were willing to take a chance and open a store on that corner. In the
past it has been a gathering place fior homeless and drug dealers. I do not know what the HPC has done to
attract new business to this area. It seems that the only type of business that the city council is interested in are
bars and liquor stores. Even though they did not go through the correct channels I believe they should keep their
awnings and signs. Walk up to Jackson past 10th street if you want to see ugly sgins. The liquor store that has
temporary signs plastered all over their windows. These must comply? I would much rather see a business with
less than perfect signage rather than an empty store front. Gretchen Marshall
file:J/C:�Documents and Settings\spongamy\Loca] Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4BDFl0E5ma... 5!4l2010
CF 10-630
(5l3/2010) Amy Spong - awnings Page 1
From: Mary Lou Walbum <maryloa@railwave.com>
To: <amy.spong@ci.sipaul.mn.us>
Date: 4/30120'10 3:46 PM
Subject: awnings '
To whom it may rAnczm:
Once again the C(ty of St. Paul stands reatly to punish the smail
business community for trying to use their time and money to creafe a
business community in lhe downtown community. Priof to ihe Guitar
business began rastoring the property at 191 Seventh Street East ft
was a Nndown dfrty building. Now, thanks to thefr hard work and
money a fresh Uean establishment has emerge. So what'rf awnings
were put up withaut HPC approval. The building Iooks great and is an
welcome addition to our area. No one was preserving the 6uilding .
It was an eyesore. Please allow the awnings antl put your tima and
eKod into the pazking issue so customers have a piace to paric
without the parking vulture nabbing anyone who wander Into the feW
places thal are open.
Mary Lou Walburn
209 8th Street #305
St. Paul, MN 55101-
CF 10-630
Page 1 of 1
Amy Spong - Appeal for Awnings on 7th Street
From: Marjorie Abrams <abramsmaz@gmail.com>
To: <amy.spong@ci.stpaul.mn.us>
Date: 4(30(2Q1Q 5:52 PM
Subjeet: Appeal for Awnings on 7th Street
To VJhom It May Concern:
The purpose of this email is to support the appeal for awnings at 191 7th Street East.
I am shocked that the Cily Council denied the installation of two vinyl awnings. The Council should be
supporting the efforts of an small business owner who is ]ocating in what appeared to be a blighted
building. I am guessing that egos were hurt since the business owner did not request a permit. Do not
penalize the owner for actually improving the corner. The awnings look great, Pigeon droppings on the
side walk were certainly ugly?
I live in a condo about half a block away, on Wacouta and 8th. As a neighborhood resident, I hope you
will approve the installation and support the business as it deserves.
Marjorie Abrams
238 8th Street East
St. Paul, 55101
file://C:\Documents and Settings\spongamy\Local Settings\TemplXPgrpwise\4BDB 18E9ma... 5/3/2010
CF 10-630
Capitol Guitars
191 7`" Street E
Saint Paul. b�IN 55101
April 9, 2010
John Manning
Chair of HPC
Re: Appeal to City Council, HPC file # 10-015
After consideration we have decided to appeal the HPC's decision on file #10-01> to the
City Council.
We disagree with the HPC decision to deny our application on the grounds that a sign
permit for these awnings was successfully issued to the former tenant by the DSI in 2002
(permit #02-098522). They have only been re-covered by us. W e now understand that we
need a new pernu�, but we feel that if a pernut was issued before then it sbould not be
denied this time.
We feel that the awnings da not detraci from the appearance of the building or
neighboring area. There are many similaz awnings in the downtown area, including other
historic buildings.
Sincerely,
�i���
Eric Bexg
Capitol Guitazs LLC
a�� _ �, ,,,,<�
, �.� : cLw.
DEP.4RiMh.1'TOt PLAKNING&
ECCNOY:�C DEVE:.OP�c\'
Ceule 6ednr D�muor
Cj'1'l� GiF,' S'� P� 75 H'�v Fowrh Sirze! 7elzplrore �
C'!v a�opher E Cnlen+an ?ia} a. Jam Povl af^; �_ J�� F¢csnnde� b_
R�(arch 26_ 2010
Eric Berg
Cavitol Guitars LLC
i91 Seventii Stree'e Euse
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Re: 191 Seventh Street East, Walsh Biock— Individual Desigasted Site
March 25, 2010 - Agenda Item VI.B., HPC t�ile #10-015 (After-the-Fact Review)
Dear NIr. Berg:
As you tcnow, the Heritage Preservation Canmission (HPC) considered at its March 25, 201 D ineeting
your applieatSon for asign permit to instalE awpings at the property listed �bove. A�vnings were installed
without a permit or HiPC reviet�. The HPC voted 8— 0 eo d€ny yoL�r applieation. This deeision was
based on ihe discussion at the;pub(ic hearing, public testimony and findings by HPC staff.
You or any agerieved pactu has the rigt,t ro appeal [he Haritage Preservation Commission's decision to the
Saint Paul City Cotmeil under Chaptcr 7? of [he Saint PaLd Legisiative Code. Such an ap��eal must he
filed within 14 days of the da$ie of the I-IYC's order and clecisioi�. Chapter T states:
(h) Appeat m ciry �eanncit The pern�i� applecan� or any parry aggrleved bp the clecisian af rhe Ire��itage
preserv¢tioi� commirs�ran shall, u�ilhrn foin'taen (14) days ajthe dale of /he )verrtage presemnlio�� comrnission'a
order anc[ decision., have a rlght tn �ppeal smch order and dec�s+mv to the crry co�mci! The appeal s6aP be
daemed perfectecl xpon receipt by the drv+siom of pinnntna of noo (2) eopies o('n notrce of appeo! and ara�ement
settirtg forth �he gi J�r the appeaC 7he d"n�ision nf Plonning sHn!l Frpnsmit one copv of the �vouce af
appea! and s'tatenrent to the ciry councd and o��e cqoy ro tlm he!'i�age pre.een•atinn commia�sion. Thz
commrssia:r. i� cmy +vrftten rr'der denyin�: a pe�'mit c:pplrealion shnP adris't ?tre applicarst of�the rig6t te ��ppea/
ro!he citv coxrvarl and inclucle this paragraph ne aU semh o+�ders.
Alease fee( free to ca11 staff at 651 �66-4078 to discuss creating an application for awnings and/or
signa�e at your business Thai would comply wiYh the preservation program for the bvi(ding and could be
reviewed adminisTtaTivety.
Sincerely,
;!9 x e : � � F�,.
� ��� ��++
� �:'0��br,��'����SS3�'�?ii' '''^`uRfi.n'�`n"a�,s��.�•�%�.45
4� -
Christine &oulware
Historic Preservation P(anner
cc: Karen Zacho, DSI
G& S Wa}sh Properties LLC, owner
File
AA' AFPIRSvtA7IVE AC710N EQU�I. OPPORTUh�ITY 6MPLOYER