10-600City of St. Paul Amended 6/2,f�p�1AdCIL FILE NO. � (�t�o
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT By���� �
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
Y�
J1002A3 (108896) siuniiiary abatement (property clean-up) on private properry at 699 Virginia St on January 20,
2010.
LAID OVER TO OS/18/10 LEG HEARING AND 06/02/10 PUBLIC HEARING
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment
having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to b�-9t�e
-@���: �read the payments over three (3) years.
Bostrom
Carter
Hazris
Stazk
Thune
Yeas
r
Adopted by Council: Date �o
Adoption Certified by Coun ' ecretary
By: �
Approved b yo � Date CL/ � j � I�{�Zorp
BY� ^ ��/�d,[X-('itilr�(!Y��
Requested by I�e�art� nt o� ��1 rv'
B y' � 0
Approved by the Office of m �
By: �-(�
Approved by Ci Attorney
BY: ��� � �'�ti�
Approved by vIayor for Submission t�Council
BY� 9.�I�1/��� �c�
�o- t000
City of St. Paul
Office of Financial Services
Real Estate Section
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT
COUNCIL FILE NO.
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Wazd In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
J 1002A3 (108896) sixuunary abatement (property clean-up) on private property at 699 Virginia St on January 20,
2010.
LAID OVER TO OS/18/10 LEG HEARING AND 06/02/10 PUBLIC HEARING
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
The Financial Services Real EstaYe Section hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the
expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total costs
DSI Admin Fee
Pazks Adinin Fee
Charge-Code Enforcement
Rea1 Estate Service Charge
Attorney Fees
$270.00
$
$
$115.00
$ 20.00
$ 5.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Chazge To
Net Assessment
$410.00
$410.00
Said Financial Services Real Estate Section fiu•ther reports that it has assessed and levied the total amount
as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $410.00 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted
by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or pazcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred
thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature ofthe Real
Estate Manager, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by said Real Estate Section, and which
is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper.
Dated 5 /� /!� �-
Real�state ager:
�� �.� � i �- it� ��- �'� � a ��
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
,__-�---....�- •� - •._ _ . . ... . . �� ` ��D
FS —FinancialServices
ContaM Person & Phone:
Lynn Moser
266-8851
Idust Be on Council Agenda by (Date):
Dot. Type:OTHER (DOESNT FITANY
CATEGORY)
E-0ocument Required: Y
DocumentContact KmRarn✓eiler
ConpM Phone: 266-8856
10 MAY 2010
�
Assign
Number
For
Rouling
Order
Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature)
Green Sheet NO: 3110417
0 inancial Services
i " Attorn
2 inaocialServices
3 a oPSOffice
4 ounc�
5 i Clerk
At Council's request this item was laid over to 5/18/10 LEG HEARING and 6/2/10 PUBLIC HEARING, summary abatement
(property clean-up) on private property at 699 Virginia St on January 20, 2010. File No. J 1002A3
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R):
Planning Commission
CIB CommiKee
Personal Serviee Contracts Must Mswer the Followi�g Questions:
1. Has ihis persoNfirtn ever worked under a contract for this department?
Yes No
Civii Service Commission 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this person/firtn possess a skill not normally possessed by any
curtent city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, lssues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Properiy owners or renters create a health hazard at various times throughout the Ciry of Saint Paul when their pmperty is not kept up.
The City is required by City code to clean up the property and chazge the property owner for the clean up. �
Advanfages H Approved:
Cost recovery programs to recover expenses for snmmary abatement, grass cutting, towing of abandoned vehicles, demolitions,
gazbage hauling, tree removal and boazdings-up.
Disadvantages If Approved:
None
Disadvanhges H Not Approved:
If Council dces not appmve these charges general fund would be required to pay [he assessment.
Total Amount of $410.00
Trensaction:
Funding Source:
Financial Information:
(Explain)
CostlRevenue Budgeted:
Activity Number:
1 property ownet will be notified of the publc hearing and charges.
���m ����E�
�?�te .�. 8. ����
May 10, 201011:12 AM Page 1
June 1, 2010 Legislative Hearing Minutes
Summary Abatement Assessment refened back by Council on 5/5:
J01002A Property clean ups from Januazy 15 to January 28, 2010
699 Vireinia Street
ic�— c��
Page 2
Zhi Kai Yu, property owner, appeared. John Choy, Betmar Language, appeared and provided
Chinese translation for the property owner.
Mr. Essling stated orders were issued on January 7, 2010 to remove refuse and household items at
the rear of the yard and by the alley with a compliance date of January 12. The property was re-
inspected on January 11 and was not in compliance. A work order was sent to Parks who did the
work on January 20, 2010 for a total assessment of $410.
Ms. Moermond asked to see the video which showed junk in the backyard and by the alley which
was removed by Parks.
Mr. Choy stated that the property was rental and Mr. Yu had asked the tenants to remove tbe items.
They had removed some stuff and then he also removed some additional stuff that the tenants had
failed to get rid of. When he went back to the property, he saw the stuff was gone and thought the
tenants had removed the items until he received the notice for the hearing. He also had two bills for
property clean ups that had been done at 470 Edmund. This was a financial hardship to him having
to pay such high assessments.
Ms. Moermond stated that she could not consider the appeals for assessment which had alread�
been ratified by the City Council. As for the assessment which was before her, the city clearly did
the work and she recommended approving the assessment and spreading the payments over three
years.
d
a`'
h
E^
Y
b0
G
�
�
�
O
£'.
f7
O �
O �
�. O
� a
V �
N Y
�� a
M
v
., n
a Q
p� o
R
L rJ
N G"i
x '�
�a
d
e
d
a
a
�
>
O
s
6
�
Fw
0
O
N
b
h
�
ti
�
i
Im
lo
I�
IM
IN
l� I M
�
�
�
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
I o � o vi o
C� N v3
I69 £A � �
I
{
I
I O O O O
O O O O
O ^ -: �
I N --�
I
I
I O O O O
I � N �
I
I
<
s
I �
I C [y 6
I� c m
I a � v � F'
�d C v °�' �
w ;,
�� ° 3
I � � � O O
v� Q f�.' Q' a�
I
IF
Ia
lo
Iz
I�rv
6m
I%t�
I� N
0
5 .�
I `JQ
�
�
�
I
I
I � o
�n o
I � N
H �
I O � �
Q
I � V�i � O
� � 'C C7 m
'�' �M � N�. � bp
I � Y' � L'
� ' u , � � N C
.� a 0.� a� 3 0.�
IN� �*°• +
c
�
fi
L
Z
�
� C
0
Ca
N
c
L
Q
0
0.
L
F
L
d
C
Wo
O �"
z
�
¢
<
�
wrn
� o
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
� ^ N �
6 69 �
�
�
c'� �
�
p w
Q �
.�
� �
�
� Q
� �
E"" i L r
N
w
�
�
�
N
Y
F
�
�
F
w
N
�
�
H
0
0
O
R
�
y
U
L
R a
[� v
d
U U E
^ R iG
• L � W
p." o
lo- l000