10-599City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT
�
to- sqq
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Wazd In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
��
J1002A2 (108895) suumiary abatement (properry clean-up) on private property at 1161 St Clau Ave on January
27, 2010.
LAID OVER TO OS/18/10 LEG FIEARING AND 06/02/10 PUBLIC HEARING
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment
having been fm�ther considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One
equal installments.
Adontioa.Ge�tified y o mcil retary
/' '
By:
Approved_ � or: Date ��7��(��
(/,) '
By: L��
Requested b� pep r�a ici d Se ic
B:
Approved by the Offi , e�
!
By:
Approved b Ci Attomey
BY� �i,5 GL �, ���
Approved b Mayor for Submission to Council
BY� �G'!/C�/.�Y.P,tr`�_/
Adopted by Council: Date (p �� , � �j��
�o-Sqq
City of St. Paul
Office of Financial Services
Rea1 Estate Section
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT
COUNCIL FILE NO.
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
J1002A2 (108895) suimnary abatement (property clean-up) on private property at 1 l61 St Clair Ave on January
27, 2010.
LAID OVER TO 05/18/10 LEG HEARING AND 06/02/10 PUBLIC HEARING
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
The Financial Services Real Estate Section hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the
expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Tota1 costs
DSI Admin Fee
Parks Admin Fee
Chazge-Code Enforcement
Rea1 Estate Service Charge
Attorney Fees
$160.00
$
$
$115.00
$ 20.00
$ 5.00
�����w�►���.���rr� ��y
Chazge To
Net Assessment
$300.00
$300.00
Said Financial Services Real Estate Section further reports that it has assessed and levied the total amount
as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $300.00 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted
by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or pazcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred
thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the Real
Estate Manager, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by said Real Estate Section, and which
is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper.
Dated �� ��
Re Estate ager:
� D - L � - � i� l(� L �-��-� �-/�
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Shee �
�------....._ ._ _ . . ... . . Io- S9°►
FS —F�nancialServices
ConWd Person 8 Phone:
Lynn Moser
266
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date):
Doc. Type: OTHER (DOESNT Fff ANY
CATEGORI�
E-0ocument Required: Y
Document ContaM: wm Ranweiler
Conpd Phone: 266-8856
Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip Ail Lowtions for Signature)
At Council's request tlils item was laid over to 5/18/10 LEG HEARING and 6/2/10 PUBLIC HEARING, suwwary abatement
(property clean-up) on private property a[ 1161 St Clair Ave on January 27, 2010. File No. J1002A2
Recommenda6ons: Approve (A) or Reject (R):
Planning Commission
CIB Committee
Civil Service Commission
Inkiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why);
Property owners or renters create a health hazazd at various times throughout ihe Ciry of Saint Paul when theu property is not kept up.
The Ciry is required by City code to clean up the property and chazge the property owner for the clean up.
Advantages If Approveil:
Cost rewvery progams to recover expenses for sumtnary abatement, grass cutting, towing of abandoned vehicles, demolifions,
garbage hauling, tree remova( and boazdings
DisadvanWges HApproved:
None
,a�YZO,o I Green Sheet NO: 3110376
�
Assign
Number
For
Routing
Order
PeYSOnaI Service Contracts Must Mswer the Following Questions:
t. Has ihis person/firm ever worked under a contract for ihis department?
Yes No
2. Has ihis persoNfirtn ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does ihis person/firm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any
curtent city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and aNach to green sheef.
DisadvanWges B Not Approved:
If Council does not approve these charges general fund would be required ro pay the assessment.
Total Amount of $300.00
Transaction:
Funding Source:
CostlRevenue Budgeted:
��`y . .�tU�D
Financial Information:
(ExpWin)
Attivity Number:
1 property owner will be notified of the public hearing and charges.
x°3�7 S �' i�f!1
May 10, 2010 10:35 AM Page 1
lo-Sqq
May 18, 2010 Legislative Hearing Minutes
J01002A Properiy clean ups from January 15 to January 28, 2010;
1161 St. Clair Avenue (J1002A)
Property owner failed to attend the April 20 hearing.
Page 5
Mr. Essling stated that a letter was mailed on January 20, 2010 to removed snow/ice from the public
sidewalk with a compliance date of January 22. The property was inspected on January 23 and was
not in compliance. A work order was sent to Parks who cleazed the walk on January 27, 2010 for a
total assessment of $300. The letter was sent to Wolkowicz Family LP at 885 St. Paul Avenue.
There was no returned mail.
Joe Wolkowicz, property owner, stated that he had believed the assessment was for graffiti for
which he had already signed a waiver.
Ms. Moermond asked to see the video which showed the sidewalk had been plowed in with snow
which Parks cleared the full width and put down sand and salt.
Mr. Wolkowicz stated that he would have to tell his snow plowing crew that they needed to do a
beuer job keeping the walk clear after the clear the lot. He again asked about a graffiti assessment.
Mr. Essling reviewed the records on STAMP and said that there was a graffiti assessment for the
property and that the new computer system did not record the waiver being on record.
Ms. Moermond recommended approving the assessment far the snow removal and recommended
deleting any pending assessment for graffiti removal.
to-5qq
�
�
F
F
N
R
e
�
N
m
0
£
N
N �
O =
O �
ti i�
',
u �
v m
�o a
a`
d
w m
a°
pp o
c �
� U
d �
x �,
�a
d
d
Q
Y
d
G
E
a
QI
O
b
h
.°»
�
H
i
i�
i�
i°
�
i�
i�
I
I�
,o
i
�
l o 0 0 0 0
o a o 0 0
�o_o�.i o
'V N 69 O
r' H3 M
IfA fP fF
I
�
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
o�n -" -�
I .. ^.
�
�
�o 0 0 0
I .-. .-+ N Vl
I
I
I
I *
� a> >.
I� � �
� c
� � � � �
�a �
� w d � m
I ¢ G � �,,
��%'� � 3
I � d W c
`o �
i �nQw�'E' .
I ¢"
I °' a
�y�
.���
��o�
Iy
�2 ��;,
�
�No
���
�' `' F
V (a
Q
��°"
I
I
I
I
I
I
� o
la ° o W N
T ¢ �
� N
�E „^,x
I'N h Q� W
m N a o
� N--�U m
V � N
�3w � c
o �.-, �a
I Y Vl ttl � N�'
13��; 3a
,.
�
L
U
� a
� Y�
c
.
d
Ca
Y
.,
C
�
Ca
L
O
L
d
F
L
F N
z
ti
¢
aa
� O
O
0 0 0 0
0 0 o O
o�o�
\O N fi3
69 69 �
N
w
�
�
���
� W Q ei
¢ A N w
� ,� +-�'+ T
�a d W �
m �
v] Q C� �
� � � y
F F F H
0
O
0
O
b�9
d
U
L
Y �
p v 0.
F Q,
d i d
' R it
� QI W
P: .. o