10-598City of St. Paul
Amended 6/2/��i1 � CIL FILE NO. l�— 5�1$
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT By
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
y,�'
J1002A1 (108894) smmnary abatement (property clean-up) on private property at 1778 Margazet St on January
28, 2010.
LAID OVER TO OS/18/10 LEG HEARING AND 06/02/10 PUBLIC HEARING
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment
having been fitrther considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects�. deleted.
�." _ _ \ _ � � _ ! Y. "" _ : ' ' '" "." . �.-_ _ ,.�. ' " : a t:,t:lYi:..:: �aiiYl:�� A �
Bosffom
Carter
Harris
Stazk
Thune
Adopted by Council: Date
Yeas Na s Absent Requested f. ' 9nci�tl S fvi �s
✓
/ By:
�
✓
'� Approved by the Office of c al 5�i' es
� �
✓ B Y'
✓
a�iv
Adoption Certified by Coi '1 Secretary
By: (_ �
Approved o. Date U� ( �{ Zo /,�
By: ���%�—,
Approved by City Attorney
BY� �!'rS�(/l �. �,�
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
BY. �� ^ �
to - Sal�b
City of St. Paul
Office of Financial Services
Real Estate Section
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT
COUNCIL FILE NO.
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
J1002A1 (108894) sununary abatement (properiy clean-up) on private properiy at 1778 Mazgazet St on January
28, 2010.
LAID OVER TO OS/18/10 LEG HEARING AND 06/02/10 PUBLIC HEARING
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
The Financial Services Real Estate Section hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement ofthe
expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total costs
DSI Admin Fee
Parks Adxnin Fee
Charge-Code Enforcement
Rea1 Estate Service Chazge
Attorney Fees
$240.00
$115.00
$
$
$ 20.00
$ 5.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Charge To
Net Assessment
i� :1 11
$380.00
Said Financial Services Real Estate Section further reports that it has assessed and levied the total amount
as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $380.00 upon each and every lot, part or pazcel of land deemed benefitted
by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred
thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the Rea1
Estate Manager, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by said Real Estate Section, and which
is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper.
Dated � /O D \
Re Estate Ma ger:
� a � N �=� � �o �Q ��- � a �o
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
ta-ca.�
DepartmenU�ce/Council: Date Infiated:
.• . s,
FS —FinanciaiServices ,o,,,A.fzo,o Green Sheet NO: 3110336
Conqct Person & Phone: Deoartment Sent To Person Initia ate
LY�n MOSef � 0 ioancial Services L n Moser
266$$51 1 i Attome Lisa V�h
Assign Z �nan�ialServices Ma aretKetl
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): Num6er 3 a or's Office Ma or/ASSistant
/r a f�K For
Roufing 4 onac� M Erickson
Doc. T OTHER (DOESNT FR ANY Order 5 ' Clerk SLari Maore
�� CATEGORI�
E-DOCUmentRequired: Y
DocumentContact: �mRanweiler
Contact Phone: 266$856 �
� �
ToWI # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations forSignature)
Aetion Requested:
At Council's request this item was laid over to 5/18/10 LEG HEAI2ING and 6/2/10 PUBLIC HEARING, summary abatement
(pmperty clean-up) on private pmperry at 1778 Margazet St on January 28, 2010. File No. J1002A1
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Mswer the Following Questions:
Planning Commission 1. Has this personlfirm ever worked under a conUact for this departmenY?
CIB Committee Yes No
Civil Service Commission 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does ihis personffirtn pwsess a skill not nortnally possessed by any �
curtent city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Property owners or renters create a health hazard at various times throughout ihe City of Saint Paul when theu property is not kept up.
The City is required by City code to clean up the property and chazge the properiy owner for [he clean up.
Advanpges If Approved: �
Cost recovery programs to recover expenses for snmmary abatement, grass cutting, towing of abandoned vehicles, demolirions,
garbage hauling, tree removal and boazdings-up.
DisadvanWges If Approved:
None
Disadvantages If NotApproved:
If Council does not approve these chazges general fund would be required to pay the assessment.
��' Y�.,�V�L./
Total Amount of
Transadion: $380.00 CosVRevenue Budgeted: Ad�`� 5 r���a
�' t l�
Funding Source: Activity Number:
Rnanciallnformation: ���� ��}���
(Explain) ' d �
1 property owner will be notified of the public hearing and chazges. �
May 10, 2010 10:13 AM Page 1
�d-5a$
May 18, 2010 Legislative Hearing Minutes
J01002A Property clean ups from January 15 to January 28, 2010;
1778 Mar2aret Street (J1002A)
Property owner failed to attend the Apri120 hearing.
Page 4
Mr. Essling stated that a letter was mailed on January 21, 2010 to remove snow/ice from the public
sidewalk with a compliance date of January 24. The property was inspected on January 25 and was
not in compliance. A work order was sent to Parks who cleared the walk on January 28, 2010 for a
total assessment of $380. He said he believed the correct amount of the assessment should be $300
and recommended reducing the cost. The letter was mailed to Tamer Azzazi at 457 Snelling
Avenue N in St. Paul and to the occupant. There was no returned mail.
Jeannette Skipper, tenant, admitted that she had received the letter; however, she had injured her
back in a car accident and had attempted to cleaz the walk the best she could.
Ms. Moermond asked to see the video which showed Parks had cleared the walk the full width and
opened the corners at White Bear Avenue and Margaret Street.
Ms. Moermond stated that it is the property owner's responsibility to maintain the property and
clearly the city had done the work. She recommended reducing the assessment from a total of $380
to a total of $300.
ln` S°1°
d
G
F
F
v
W
G
R
P
�
O
�'.
rl
N A
O C
O Q
5 i+
'3
u �
v m
�a a
a`
a
A
=q
.7 �
= O
�y �
A �
d �
xa
d
s
d
d
�
�
0
C
r�r
a
Pn
0
.r
O
N
h
c�
v
e�l
e
..
I
��
� O
O
� 'y
��
j N
� N
IM
I
I
I
� 0000 0
a000 0
�a�o� o
C N 69 >J
I N ^ �f3 r�
'�f3 Efj Ff3
I
I
I
I O O O O
O O O O
I p h .. .-.
iN �
I
I O O O O
I��N'^
I
I
I
I *
x
� �
I� w �
E °
� F�
� � �
� � w d �
4 a m"
� � � ' � 3
� �• Q' (-� L'
o �
�v =
�
lo
F
I�
�o
I�
I ri w
Ipk
U�
I@'�
��p
I cJa
I
I
I
I
I �
0 0
I � �' p
I �
N 7+ � � �
I N R 7 N � �
�
I N N¢ z(' p
N Q � � �
I �v m rn A" �° '� :o
i ~^ l� u l� � CJ
����* 3a
i
L
a
i
� 3
� �
0
0
L
U
Ca
v
�
0
u
A
L
d
P
K
F
i
L
0
F �
O
W
ah
a �.,
* o
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
o� ovi
N ^ 6 N n 69
sH v3
�
�
N 'y'
N
�w
d c
N 'O
� Q
�
F F
N
w
C.
�
6 �
N w
W �
O
C4 Q
� Y
HF
0
0
C
�
�
y.
'v
U
Y
CQ R
0 v Qr
F � y
u u �
� � k
s�. F W
a..o