10-597City of St. Paul Amended 6/2/2010
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT
COUNCIL FILE N0. �0 ^ S°I}
;:
By '�� �
J �[
File No. SEE BELOW T�
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Wazd In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
J1002A4 (108897) smnmary abatement (property clean-up) on private property at 1187 Edgerton St on January
22, 2010.
LAID OVER TO OS/18/10 LEG HEARING AND 06/02/10 PUBLIC HEARING
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment
having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in a11 respects�. deleted
' -' ' ' - - - ..
Yeas
Bosvom
Carter
Harris
Adopted by Council: Date { A%�a�G�/!�
_ :, -� - � e;:.r ; -
� � /��tl/�
- • '
_ �. ' �� • -� . - i�6.- . i. ..
� /�i��i
� �- -
.,, , -.. .
� : � : �' ,
Adoption Certified by Counc' Secretary
By: �
Approvedb ay : Date �O 1�f J� ��
By:
Approved y Mayor for Submission to C uncil
By:
1n-59�-
City of St. Paul
Office of Financial Services
Real Estate Section
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT
COUNCIL FILE NO.
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
J1002A4 (108897) suuunary abatement (property clean-up) on private property at 1187 Edgerton St on January
22, 2010.
LAID OVER TO OS/18/1Q LEG HEARING AND 06/02/10 PUBLIC HEARING
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
The Financial Services Real Estate Section hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement ofthe
expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total costs
DSI Admin Fee
Parks Admin Fee
Charge-Code Enforcement
Rea1 Estate Service Chazge
Attorney Fees
$160.00
$
$
$115.00
$ 20.00
$ 5.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Charge To
Net Assessment
$300.00
$300.00
Said Financial Services Real Estate Section further reports that it has assessed and levied the total amount
as above ascertained, to-wit the sum of $300.00 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted
by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or pazcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred
thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the Rea1
Estate Manager, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by said Real Estate Section, and which
is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper.
Dated � f � j'� �
Re 1 Estate anager:
� o �� � ��= io � o ��-�- � a-1�
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet
� ca. ce'L
�
DeparlmentlOffice/Council: Date Initiated:
- - • �
FS-FinancialServices 1pMAY2010 Green Sheet NO: 3110436
Contact Person & Phone• �enartment SeM To Person Ini i ate
Lynn Maser � 0 inancial Services L n Mo er
26s$aS� 1 ' AttorneY Lisa
A55ign Z �nancialServica Ma aretKeO
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): Number 3 or's Office Ma or/Assismnt
For
Routing 4 ooncil Ma Erickson
Doc. T OTHER (DOESNT FIT ANY Order 5 i Clerk Shari Moore
�� CA7EGORl�
E-DOCUment Required: Y
DocumentCoMact: kmRanweiler
ConpctPhone: 266-8856
ToW10 of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations forSignature)
Action Requested:
At Council's request this item was laid over to 5/18/10 LEG HEARING and 6/2/10 PUBLIC HEARING, summary abatement
(property clean-up) on private property at 1187 Edgerton St on January 22, 2010. File No. J1002A4
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Mswer the Following Questions:
Planning Commission 1, Has this persoNfirm ever worked under a contract for this department?
CIB Committee Yes No
Civil Service Commission 2. Has ihis persoNfirm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this personlfirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, lssues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Property owners or renteis create a health l�azard at various tunes throughout the City of Saint Paul when their property is not kept up.
The City is required by Ciry code to clean up the property and chazge the property owner for the �lean up.
AdvanWgeslfApproved:
Cost recovery programs to recover e�cpenses for summary abatement, grass cutting, towing of abandoned vehicles, demolitions,
gazbage hauling, tree removal and boardings-up.
Disadvantages N Approved:
None
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
If Council does not approve these chazges general fund would be required to pay the assessment.
Total AmouM of �.,- � ����
Transaction: $300.00 CosURevenue Budgeted:
��',
Funding Source: Activity Number:
� ti'��
Financial informatiorr. E F4� i�'' ����
(Explain)
1 properly owner will be notified of the public hearing and chazges. �' ��
May 10, 2010 11:21 AM Page 1
ln - Sq}
May 18, 2010 Legislative Hearing Minutes
J01002A Property clean ups from January 15 to January 28, 2010;
1187 Edeerton Street (J1002A)
Property owner failed to attend the April 20 hearing.
Page 3
Mr. Yannazelly stated that this was a category 2 vacant building which file was opened on October
10, 2007. A letter was sent on January 14, 2010 to remove snow/ice from the public sidewalk with
a compliance date of January 17. The property was inspected on January 19 and was not in
compliance. A work order was sent to Pazks who cleazed the walk on Januazy 22, 2010 for a total
assessment of $300.
Van Nguyen, property owner, stated that she had pixrchased the property on July 22, 2009 and
admitted that she was unawaze that she needed to mow the lawn and shovel the snow. She was now
aware that it was her responsibility; however, she never received the letter.
Mr. Yannareily stated that the letter was mailed to Van Nguyen at 1187 Edgerton Street and to the
occupant. There was no retuined mail. Ms. Nguyen responded that the post office would not
deliver mail to a vacant building and that she lived in Blaine. She said she had gone through the
sale review process, had paid the vacant building fee and they should have had her address. Mr.
Yannarelly reviewed the records in STAMP and noticed that the vacant building fee had been paid
by check on October 20, 2009 and DSI should have had her correct address.
Ms. Moermond stated that she was concerned with her admitting that she had not shoveled the
walk; however, since she did not receive proper legal notification, she recommended deleting the
assessment.
�
a`'
ti
F
N
G
L'
�
a
O
�'.
Q
�
o�
o=
0
•, '
V �
U L
�� a
P.
.
.7 q
c �
�,, m
R �
N �r"
�+ a
�a
s
�
¢
C
G
>
L
a
�
�
0.�i
0
N
�
�
N
ti
ti
i
lo
lo
i°
I�
IN
IN
f�
I
I
I
�0000 0
000 o
�°;N� S
I���' �
I
I O O O O
O O O O
I� � ti �
I ti r.
I
I
I O O O O
I'�N'^
I
I
I
I C F4
I °' c
� „ E
�� a�a
�Q ❑ � w
IE¢W E
�
O
I� Q � Q
�
lo�'m
F
lz�"
�°�o
I
I , N �
I���
��ao
� �aa
t- u.
O
�u
I w <r
�
�
�
�
I
I
L
C
�
� a
0
'
G
E
Y
Yti
C
.�
Ca
a
:
�
ro
�
F
�
c
O
iF
0
i N
� �
z
�
a ^
c. a
I N1 � O
N M !n �
I z� ,�
� � j � O �.,
c"�� o
� `"
C O '� W
�T m�Z� m
�
i o'4�3�w c
-7+ F'i W CJ l� y'C
I>
�
x
i
L
3
0 0 0 0
O O O o
� h 0 �
�O ^ N� f1-�
4f3 £A
N
N
� w
� �
� E
.o w ¢
Q L�" N
E¢ N
W
� � �
� Q �i
m ia m
�['i h F
w
v
�
�
Q
a
H
0
O
�
O
�
y
U
.. y�
R R
F v a
a�i s�. a'�i
' R k
i a W
Pr .r O
to- 5�}