10-526City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT
COIJNC� F�L$ NO. 10-526
B ��ll ��1
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Wazd In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
1001LDSRP (104927) replacement of Lead Water service lines as requested by the property owner, 2009.
A public heazing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment
having been fiu-ther considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTI-IER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in twen
equal installments.
Yeas
Bostrom ,i
Carter ,/
Harris ✓
Helgen ,/
Lantr3' ✓
Stark
Thune �/
Absent Adopte
Date:
Certifie
By:
✓ Mayor:
1
by the Council
��J 1 �al�/11
n�v L�� i�e �-� �i�
�
5 �9 1�
t � 10-526
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
FS —��nancia4Services
CoMact Person & Phonec
Lynn Moser
266-8851
on Couneii Agenda by (Date):
Uoe.
E-OccumentRequired: Y
24MAR2010 � Green Sheet NO: 3'l03976
�
Assign
Number
Por -
Routing
Ordef
ANl'
Document ConWet: 1Gm Ranweiler
Confact Phone: 266-8856
ToW � of SignaWre Pages _(Clip Ail LoeaYrons for Signature)
Action Requested:
Set datc ofpublic hearing and approve assmts for replacement of lead water service Lines as requested hy the property owner, 2009.
File No. 1001LDSRP
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R):
Plan�ing Commission
CIB Committee
Ciw7 Service Commission
Personal Serviee Contracts Must Mswer the Following 4uesHons:
7. Has this persoNfirtn ever worked under a contract for Mis department7
Yes No
2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this person(fimf possess a sfdll nat nortnatiy possessed by any
curtent city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Property owners replacing their lead water seivice connections Lave requested that the cost of the work be paid by assessment. Work
has been done, and Ciry has paid for the work
Advanfages If Approved:
Ratification of the assessments will allow Ciry to begin recovering the cost of the work done.
Disadvantages If Approved:
None
Disadvantages H Not Approved:
City would not recover tfie money a�ready paid out for the lead replacement work done.
TotalAmountof $�Q440.00
Transaction:
Funding Source:
CosURevenue Budgeted:
Activ'Ny Ttumber.
Financial lnfnrmation:
t�� 3 proper[y owners wi11 be notified of the public hearing and charges.
Ma�ch 24, 2010 7:18 AM
Page 1
City of St. Paul
Keal Estate Division
Dept.of Technology & Management Serv.
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT
COLTNCILFILENO. io-5z6
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELO W
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
1001LDSRP (104927) replacement of Lead Water service lines as requested by the property owner, 2009.
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement ofthe
expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total costs
Water Dept Service Fee
DSI Administration Fee
Code - Enfarcement Service Fee
Real Estate Service Fee
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Charge To
Net Assessment
$10,200.00
$ 120.00
$
$ 120.00
$10,440.00
$10,440.00
Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer fiulher reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as
above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $10.440.00 upon each and every lot, part or pazcel of land deemed benefitted
by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, pazt or pazcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred
thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said
Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed byhim, and which
is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper.
Dated:
3�zy�p
�
� � Valuation and Assessment Engineer:
� ����°�
m
�
F
�
L
F
G
�
�
�
�
Q
z
��
A �
0
oa
0
��
V �
d
L
a
Y
E
r� A
on �
a �
'C .
v � '.C' i
m
�
N
N
4
G
�
>
0
E
..
�
a
a'.
0
M
M
N
i
I�
i�
I o
�
I�
��
N
��
I �
1�
�
�
�aSS o
�odo 0
W a a �
I ^� EA 69 N
N N
I:i3 V3
I
I O o 0
000
,�__
I ry"
�
I
�O O O
I�°°
I
I
I
I `
,
.
I �
I L� L1
� a '�
� F
w¢ �
� C C N
O' � y
�� -0 3
°' 4 '�,'
�U Q � O
�
�
��N
l
��
� a
u
la
�,
� `'
V
��
I
I
I
I
I
I o
I O 3: O
I N� N
�a �
I °� m '� F M
��°z
I.�W c�� �
�n O
� � � � �
w b1J M
I �'i ..°J. cC V� . c
�o > � � r 'Q �o
1 � � W 0.�,3CL
�'C] C7 -- r�n � «
�
�i
w�
a
�
.�
8
G
.
O
m`
i
a,
�
F
L
O
v
i
I
i�
�
IM
f�
I M
N
IN
'o
�
�
j�oo 0
c o 0 0
lo 0 0 0
ovv o�
I N 6^ 69 N
1� �
�
I
I O O O
000
,
I
I
�
�O O O
I�°°
I
I
i
1 `
.
.
I �
I �J N
w a
I c �
� w ¢ 9
I �
C C N
w
O' N
� � � 3
��¢`� O
o in �
�OC�c4 *+
�
�
��
I�
��
� ,
�� m
�g o
� z
w
a "
�a w
I � o.
I � .
I
I
I
I
I
f
{ � o
N p
I � O � M
f � -- x
N N
I °�'QoU "'
��3 ��Q a
��=oz�� m
L � � � �1
I � � � y � � 9
,G N O � O+ N �
U
IccwN�n:
�
(
IM
��
� N
I M
� N
IN
� M
�
i
j000 0
0 0 0 0
�o 0 0 0
N V V O
I W £1? V3 G1
V R
I f9 e4
I
I O O O
000
,o__
` I�
I
�
iO O O
I�°�
I
I
i
I `
.
�
I �
a> T
I N N
w � � °
� � ¢ '�
I C C N �
O " � N
� � % 3
Q
�c � O
�UQ� .
�
� r1
�
{y
��
IO.,
�Qm
�Q�
z �-
��
���
I
I
I
I
I
� c
I M O
I �� N
�¢ N
�� �o "'
I � ¢ y�j z p
Iw Gz� �
I � � �' Q " �
�
a 3Wzi�
�N W �r'� c
lvaa
O O O
0 0 0
O O O
N ^ ^
o ��
�n
�
w
�
w �
O G N
Y
U b �
N Q
V (-� '�,
� y �
E-� [-� F
O
O
O
�
�
0
v�s
�
U
L
R R
F: � a
a
U U E
N Y d
' R Yt
y QI W
P.no
10-526