Loading...
10-287Amended 3/17/2010 City of St. Paul RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT COLtNCIL FILE NO. 10-287 � " By l File No. SEE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW Voring Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for �� J1003G1 (108855) providing weekly gazbage hauling during November, 2009 to Februvy, 2010 at 720 Euclid St. (Combined All). A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects�ati€tad: deleted. I2����H� z�tm��stattment- Yeas Nays Absent Adopted by the Council Bostrom �/ Date: 1' ��7��d�d Carter �/ Harris ✓ Certified Passed b the Council Secret Helgen r/ By: ���� �.���� Lantry ✓ Stark ✓ Mayor: Thune '� � � � City of St. Paul Real Estate Division Dept.of Technology & Management Serv. REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT COUNCIL FILE NO. 10-287 File No. SEE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW Voting Wazd In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for J1003G1 (108855) providing weekly garbage hauling during November, 2009 to Februaty, 2010 at 720 Euclid St. (Combined All). To the Council of the City of St. Paul The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby repofts to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz: Total costs Park Service Fee Code - Enforcement Service Fee Real Estate Service Fee Attorney Fee $650.00 $ $120.00 $ 30.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES Charge To Net Assessment '.:11 11 $800.00 Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $800.00 upon each and every lot, part or pazcel of land deemed benefitted by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, idenrified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper. Dated: For Valua n and Assessment Engineer: ��o��-/D ��G�,Ch-i"h�c� Na �� i��� ��— 3-i� iL1 �o , � Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet � DeparbnentlOffice/Council: Date Initiated: FS —FinanaalServices p4FE62010 Green Sheet NO: 3100216 Contad Person & Ph e• Departrnent SeM To Person InitiaUDate Lynn Moser (�J/ y o �anci� se�,•;ces L m Moser 266-8851 V 1 ouuu7 Ma Erickson �� 2 i Cierk ' Clerk Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): Number _ For Routing Doc.Type:OTHER(DOESNTFITANY Order CATEGOR� E-0ceument Required: Y Document CoMact � Ranwei{er ContaM Phone: 226-8&56 � ToWI # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature) Action Requested: ' Set date of public hearing and approve assmts for weekly ga�'uage hauling during Nov, 2009 to Feb, 2010 at 720 Eulcid St. (Combined All). File No. J1003G1 RecommendaUons: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Pewonal Service Contracts Must Mswer the Following Questions: Planning Commission _ �, Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this departmenl? q8 Committee Yes No � Civil Service Commission 2. Has this persoNfirm eve� been a city employee? Yes No 3. Does ihis person/firm possess a sldll not nortnally possessed by any current city empioyee? Yes No ExQlai� all yes answecs on separate sheet and attach to green sheet. Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): Property owners or renters ereate a heakh hazard at vazious times throughout the City of Saint Paul when their propeity is not kept up. The Ciry is required by City code to clean up the property and charge the properiy owner for the clean up. Advanqges If Approved: Cost recovery programs to recover expenses for summary abatement, grass cutting, towing of abandoned vehicles, demolitions, garbage hauling and boazdings-up. Disadvantages HApproved: None DisadvantageslfNOtApproved: - If Council does not approve these charges general fund would be required to pay the assesstnent Tota� Amount of Trensaction: $8��'� CoStlRevenue Sudgeted: Funding Source: Activity Number: � Financiai Infortnation: � (Explain) 1 property owner will be notified of the public hearing and chazges. February 24, 2010 1:42 PM Page 1 10-287 February 16, 2010 Legislative Hearing Minutes 720 Euclid Street (J0921G} and (J0922G) Property owner Michelle VanGuilder appeared. Page 10 Mr. Essling read the Summary Abatement History into the record: Orders to provide refuse service by a licensed hauler were sent on October 22, 2009, with a compliance date of October 30. The property was rechecked on November 3 and was not in compliance. A work order was sent to Parks and the work was performed on November 18 and November 25. The assessment amount was $100 plus a$25 service charge. Mr. Essling said there were at least five additional weeks of service, and that he would like to recommend deleting the assessments J0922G through J0102G as long as the assessments for drop off, pick up, and the first week were paid or approved. Ms. Moermond asked for a clarification of the fees listed. Mr. Essling said there were 13 weeks of service at $50 a week, plus $50 each for drop off and pick up, and a$25 fee. He said he recommended deleting all but $175. Ms. VanGuilder stated that the city had dropped off a container but it had never been used. She said her parents had arranged for service by a licensed hauler the same week the city container was delivered, and she had called the number listed on the letter and been told the city service would be cancelled. Mr. Essling said DSI agreed with that. Ms. Moermond asked about the history at the property. Mr. Essling said there had been a tall grass and weeds complaint in 2009, and snow complaint in 2010 with compliance on inspection. Ms. Moermond asked Ms. VanGuilder how her mother managed the yard work and shoveling. Ms. V anGuilder said she and her brothers helped. Ms. Moermond asked Ms. V anGuilder whether her parents owned the house ouh Ms. VanGuider said they did. Ms. Moermond recommended that the total of all assessments be the staff recommendation less $50 ($125) and deleting all future assessment for garbage hauling service at the property. io-ZS� � € ti F � �o c � � 0 E e�n 3t O � ,. o n .. 0 � o m m •o a 0�. d .m. n�- .? c c 4��. L � � V m �= x Q a a E d h d C d � 7 m E V a1 O M N a R -: � i� i� �° i� t" N I N �� I M � � I o O o 0 0 0 0 0 Io 0 0 0 `+� N m O I � EA W fA 69 69 1 � � l o 0 0 0 0 0 lo � e �� � � �o c o I- o vi t � � � � � � � w a. c '� � � "� F, 9 '� I � Q °' `' x � w � � .. � c 1L W � � �y O � �C�7 � C > 0 0� Z �- .k ��m�o I m F � � � 0 Q O � ` I C � h Q IOY�O � oa�z I c.� ',a Orn I41Y��H pU-O i 3E�i ° ¢� H .. � � � � � � o � y � o 9 y � � � � '� � N I- c o F N �a f. V] � �, �n Q 4' � vl � O I� ����� � � Q � a .. ❑ I N i S�' `o O t� G -a i y O '•L N N Ic 3 A a L U ._ .� c � O V L O 0. � x � Y � rncc coo 0 + � � ° o ° c � � ' � � � ° o [ _�__=_. ��CN v ° z < � no� �.,<� - Po o O o O O 3 ooc00000 0 _ 000 O O O O o O O O O � 69� ti W ❑ �M � �� c�C Q .T, :� N � y c� W p � � a. F i F F w d � Q � E'^ O O O u�s N = V R � O � '�: ��,�'.. Q U d � U � W iS O a. .. o