09-904City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION RATIFYTNG ASSESSMENT
CdUNCIL FILE NO. D�l ' 6 `7
By ��
File No. 19052
Assessment No. 010766
Voting Ward
Green Sheet No. 3071822
In the Matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses far conshuction of the Hamline/Thomas
streetscape by xeplacing bituminous boulevard with concrete unit pavers, planting trees, and reconstruction of
cracked sidewalk panels.
Preliminary Order: 09-597 approved 6-3-09
Final Order: 09-654 approved 6-17-09
WHEREAS, A public hearing having been had upon the assessment far the above improvement, and
said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally
sarisfactory; naw, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in
twen equal installments.
Yeas Na s Absent
Bostrom �/
Carter �
Hanis ✓
Hel en ,i
LanW ✓
Stark rr
Thune y
Adopted by the Council: Date: ��l��A,
Certified Passed by the Council Secretary
BY i _- .` d�
Mayor
/�ub l�'L ����ri��' �-1 q Dg
Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Greea Sheet
�°����
)epartmenUOffice/Council: Datelnitiated: GI�PiP.II SIIP•P.L NO 3071822
FS —FnancialServices 2&JUN-09 ,
CoMact Person 8 Phone:
Dan Haak
266-6084
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date):
19-AUG-09
Doc. Sype: PUBLIC HEARING
(RESOLUTION}
E-Document Requiretl: Y
Document Cantact: �Ynn Moser
Contact Phpne: 266-8851
y
ASSign
Number
For
Routing
OrUer
0
i
2
3
4
5
Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip All lowtions fw Signature)
ACtion Requestetl:
Approve the assessment for construction of the HamlineJThomas streetscape by replacing bihuninous bou4evazd with concrete unit
pavers, planting trees, and reconstruction of cracked sidewalk panels.
FileNo.19052 AssessmentNo.0107b6
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R):
Ptanning Commission
C18 Commikee
Civil Service Commission
Personal Service Contracts Must Mswer the Following QuesGons:
1. Has this personlfirm ever worked under a contred for this department?
Yes No
2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
Ye5 No
3. Does ihis person/Srm possess a sftili not normaliy possessed by arry
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answere on 5eparate sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, {ssues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Ratification is necessary in order to begin collecting assessments tA help pay for the project.
Advantages If Approved:
Same as above.
Disadvantages If Approved:
Property owners will have assessments payable via properry taxes.
Disadvantages If Not Approvetl:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistant with city policy.
7ota1 Amount of $16,800.00
Transaction:
Funding Source: ASS8SS0'1enfS
Financia{ InFormation:
(F�cpiain)
CosURevenue Budgeted: Y
Activity Number:
June 22, 2009 12:57 PM Page 1