09-838City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT
Assessment No. 010767
Voting Wazd
Green Sheet No. 3071500
�7
In the Matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for reconstruction of a 40' x 10' bus pad in
front of 791 and 799 Grand Avenue as requested by the property owner.
Preliminary Order: Q9-228 approved 2/25f09
Final Order: 09-361 approved 4/01109
WHEREAS, A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and
said assessment having been fiu considered by the Council, and having been considered finally
satisfactory; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in
twen equal installments.
Yeas Nays Absent
Bostrom ✓
Carter ✓
Hanis ✓
Hel en �/
Lantry ✓
Stark
Thune
'a- O O
Adopted by the Council: Date: � S��{
Certified ssed b the Council Secretary
By
�
Mayor
FILE . ��I -��
City of St. Paui
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT
COUNCIL FILE NO. _O��
�
File No. 50713
Assessment No. 010767
Voting Ward
Green Sheet No. 3071500
In the Matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses foz reconstruction of a 40' x 10' bus pad in
front of 791 and 799 Grand Avenue as requested by the property owner.
Preliminary Order: 09-228 approved 2/25/09
Final Order: 09-361 approved 4I01J09
To the Council of the City of Saint Paul:
The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of
the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total conshuction costs
Engineering and Inspection
Valuation and Assessment Services
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Charge To:
Net Assessment
TOTAL
$ 3,356.55
$ 1,006.97
$ 234.96
$ 4,598.48
$ 4,598.48
$ 4,598.48
Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and levied the total
amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $ 4.598.48 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of
land deemed benefited by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of Iand in
accordance with the benefits confened thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto
attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made a part hereof, is
the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action
thereon as may be considered proper.
Dated
�-��'�� � �����/
aluation and Assessment Engineer
� Green Sheet Green Sheet
Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet
IJ�'�C:Gti fl
�
Uepartment/OfficelCouncil: Date Initiated: ✓ � v '� �
Fs _F����tsem� - --_ - ,a��N=o9- - -- Green Sf�eet NO:_ 3D715UQ
Contact Person & Phone: Department Sent To Person InitiallDate
AIIanCzaia o inancialserv;�w 0
266-67�$ I onnp7 M Erickson
Assign 2 lerk SLariMoore
Musi Be on Council Agenda 6y (Date): Number 3 �
05-AUG-09 For 4 �
Routing
Doc.Type:�UBLiCHEARING Order 5 �
(RESOLUTIONj
E-DOCUment Required: Y
Doeument Contact: Lynn Moser
Contact Phone: 266-885'I
Total # of Signature Pages _(C1ip Atl Locations for Signature)
Action Raquested:
Approve the assessment for reconshvc[ion of a bus pad in front of 791 and 799 Grand Avenue as requested by the property owner.
File No. 50713 Assessment No. 010767
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Mswer the Following Questions:
Pianning Commission 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department?
CIB Committee Yes No
Civil Service Commission 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this personffirm possess a skill not normaily possessed by any
cunent city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on sepa2te sheet and attach to green sheet
Initiating Probiem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Ratification is necessary in order [o begin collecting assessment to help pay for the project.
Advantages IfApproved:
Same as above.
Disadvantages If Approved:
Property owners will have assessments payable via propeity taxes.
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
To not assess the benefi[s would be inconsistant with city policy.
7otal Amount of $4,598.48 CostlRevenue Budgeted: Y
Transaction:
Funding Source: ASS@SSfT1Ef1fS Activity Number:
Financial Informa[ion:
(Explain)
June 10, 2009 2:00 PM Page 1
m
�
e
� a
� �
.a Q
��
d U
R
� y
� �
r �
b �
O
O
�•' �
a
z
.�
� �
..
�
$
U
N
O
QI
C
O
�
A
d
�
bD
W
x
�
d
e
�
a"
�
d
d
0
E
U
0
F
0
.�
d
O
L
d
0
F
a
0
0
N
O
e
F
F
0
v
0
.�'.
a
i
�
�
I N
��
I�
� �
N
I �
N
I N
0
I
I
I
I � �
a a
I� �
� �
� �
la a
I �' "
�
I
I�
I�
I�
I O
I
I
I
I
I
I C
I o
� �
C
� U
I
0
I �
I'��.�z�
IH�a��
I°�`°Q�
��
�o�H o
0
xa
I�a�ino,°
�>N4F">
�LI�x�Q
w���W
��[
�
�
I z
I a
I �
o �
U o 0
�n � o
I�aM �
i�dF�� a
W � � Q w
Z Qi W �q O
�w 2
IO Xri ��N m
I z W x ¢ "��
>°ot�-�°i3w
I Q U m � * � •
�
v
�
v
vj
a
O
.
Q
U
Y
H
�
�
ca
�
�
e"
vi
�
�
A a
F y p,
u c�i �
� e�C i�C
° a W
�
G .. O
D °(-f53�
y
4
J�
cn
y l
A
�