Loading...
D001912CJ CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA OFFICE OF TkiE MAYOR AflM1NISTRATIVE ORDER BUDGET REVISION No: o � a 1 City Clerk 2 Financial Services Date: ' D 3 Dept. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, Consistent with the authority granted to the Mayor in Section 10.07.4 of the Gity Charter and I�ased on the request of the Director of the Department of Planning & Economic development to amend the 2000 budget of the PED Operations Fund, the Director of the Office of Financial Services is authorized to amend said budget in the foliowing manner: � � $pendinr� lan 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 36010 36012 36020 36030 36045 36070 36075 0219 0219 0219 0219 0219 0219 0219 126 36010 0251 126 36012 Q251 126 36026 0251 126 36030 0251 126 36075 0251 126 126 126 126 126 36010 0252 36012 0252 36020 0252 36030 0252 36075 0252 126 126 126 126 126 36010 0253 36012 0253 36020 0253 36030 0253 36075 Q253 Current Amended Budget Change Budget 73,910 20,000 20, 000 35,100 20,000 20,000 0 (73,910) (20,000) (20,000) (35,100) (20,000) (20,000) 189,010 0 0 0 0 0 0 189,010 3,500 4QQ 1,500 2,000 0 2,000 600 1,200 1,500 0 700 350 1,300 2,000 0 (3,500) (40Q) (1,500) (2,000) 7,400 (2,000) (600) (1,200) (1,500) 5,300 (700) (350) (1,300) (2,000) 4,350 0 0 0 0 7,400 0 0 0 0 5,300 0 0 0 0 4,350 Dool�l oZ • • S�endin� Plan 126 36010 0255 126 36012 0255 126 36020 0255 126 36030 0255 126 36075 0255 126 36012 0256 126 36020 �256 126 36030 0256 126 36070 0256 Current Amended Budget Change Budget 26,100 575 200 1,235 0 (26,100) (575) (200) (1,235) 28,110 0 0 0 0 28,110 6,908 4,700 2,900 0 (6,908) (4,7Q0) (2,900) 14,508 126 36010 0259 126 36012 0259 126 36045 0259 126 36070 0259 126 36075 0259 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 36010 36010 36012 36012 36020 36020 36030 36030 36045 36045 36070 36070 36075 36075 0111 0161 0111 0161 Q111 0161 0111 0161 0111 0161 0111 0161 0111 0161 100 100 8,933 8,933 0 498,633 27,874 845,287 47,252 1,097,478 61,349 1,218,603 68,120 772,869 43,203 856,137 47,858 0 0 (100) (100) (8,933) (8,933) 18,066 (498,633) (27,874) (845,287) (47,252) (1,Q97,478) (61,349) (1,218,603) (68,120) (772,869) (43,203) (856,137) (47,858) 5,289,007 295, 656 0 � 0 14,508 0 0 0 0 18,066 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,289,007 295,656 . fJvotala • S ending Plan 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 36010 36010 36012 36012 36020 36020 36030 36030 36045 36045 36070 36070 36075 36075 0438 0439 0438 0439 0438 0439 0438 0439 0438 0439 0438 0439 0438 0439 Net Change • Prepared by: Activity Manager y� equest epartment Director Current Amended Budget Change Budget 69,841 (69,841) 81,182 (81,182) 118,395 (118,395) 137,621 (137,621) 153,718 (153,718) 178,680 (178,680) 170,683 (170,683) 198,400 (198,400) 108,252 (108,252) 125,830 (125,830) 119,915 (119,915) 139,387 (139,387) (740,804) 740,804 740,804 861,100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,601,904 [�] �. `�_ ! .., , _, ,,, , ' 2 � � �ic�c�r7 Date • IIEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCII,: DATE INITIATED ��Q � 6I � Pl anninn & Economic Dev. Augast 1, 2000 GREEN SHEET No.: 101940 CONTACI' PERSON & PHONE: C- /�� — II�liinuDal'E Tom Meyer 6-6667 � 3 DEPARTMENL DIR ci� covr�cu. ST BE ON COUNCII. AGINDA BY (DATE) �IGN CITY ATTORNEY 5 CITY CLERK NIJMBER 4 FINANCIAL SERV/ACCTG 1 TOM MEYER �H1 �$ fJ� FOR �YOR (OR ASST.) 2 CAROLE OTTO ROUT"ING pgpgg RE1'ORN TO TOM MEYER-1400 C1TY IIALL ANNEX TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1_(CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ncriox xEQt�ES�n: Approval of Admiuistrative Order - Budget Revision RECOM[vvSENDAI'IONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAI. SERVICE CON'PRACfS MUST ANSWER 1�E FOLLOWIlVG QUESTIONS: PLP.NNING COMbIISSION I. Hu this person/fum evet worked under a connact for this departrnent? CIB COMNII71'EE Yes No - CIVIL SERVICE COMIvIISSION 2. Has this persodfi:m ever been a ciry employee? Yes No 3. Does this persodfirm possess a skill not nomtally possessed by any cunent city employee? Yes No Ezplaiu ali yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORI'IJNTTY (Who, Wpa[, When, Where, Why): The 2000 budget for the PED Operarions Fund was prepazed and adopted based on organizaUonal structure no longer in existence. There is no net increase to the budget as a result of this revision. ADVe1N'CAGES IF APPROVED: The budget will reflect the organizational structure under which actual spending is being incurred in 2000. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: DISADVANI'AGES IF NOT APPROVED: TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACITON: Net effec[ 0 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED: YeS FUNDING SOURCE: PED Opera600s Budget ACTIViTYNi7MBER: FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) R�C61��fl uc G\SharerN[ILVER�gmmshtrneyerl.wpd �c rni! �.rl l i VLU,a•