09-759City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT
COUN L FILE NO. 09-759
B ��
File No. S0904
Assessment No. 010773
Voting Ward
Green Sheet No. ✓�
In the Matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for construction of a new sidewalk and
perforated drain tile system at 546 and 552 Mount Curve Boulevard as requested by the property owners in
connection with the Griggs-Jefferson RSVP Project.
Preliminary Order: 09-247 approved 3/4/09
Final Order: 09-363 approved 5/6/09
WHEREAS, A public hearing having been had upon the assessment far the above improvement, and
said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally
satisfactory; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in
twen equal installments.
Yeas Nays Absent
Bostrom ,�-
Carter
Hazris ,/
Helgen �/
Lantry r i
Stark `
Thune v
Adopted by the Council: Date: 7,S��G
Certified Passed by the Counc9l Secretary
l
BY �'i �
' Mayor
City of St. Paul
COUNCIL FILE NO. 09-759
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMEN'I' By
File No. 50904
Assessment No. 010773
Voting Wazd
Crreen Sheet No. •3o
In the Matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for consmxction of a new sidewalk and
perforated drain tile system at 546 and 552 Mount Curve Boulevazd as requested by the property owners in
connection with the Griggs-Jefferson RSVP Project.
Preliminary Order: 09-247 approved 3/4/09
Final Order: 09-363 approved 5/6/09
To the Council of the City of Saint Paul:
The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of
the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total construction costs $ 1,245.00
Engineering and Inspection $ 0
Valuation and Assessment Services $ 87.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,332.00
Charge To:
Net Assessment $ 1,332.00
TOTAL $ 1,332.00
Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and levied the total
amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $ 1332.00 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of
land deemed benefited by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or pazcel of land in
accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto
attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made apart hereof, is
the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action
thereon as may be considered proper.
Dated � �� �"/ L0.7��I�QI�/
aluation and Assessment Engineer
09-759
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
DepartmentlOffice/Council: Date Initiated:
FS -FinancialServices �4MAY-09 Green Sheet NO: 3070438
------ --- ------
Contad Person & Phone- Department Sent To Person MiUaVDate
Dan Haak o inanaal Services �
26fr6084 1 ounr�7 Ma Erickson
A55ign Z ' Cierk ShariMoore
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): Number 0
15JUL-09 For 3
Routing 4 �
Doc. Type: PUBLIC HEARING Order 5
(RESOLUTIONj
E-DOCUmentRequired: Y
DocumentConWCt: LynnMoser
Contact Phone: 266-8851
Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature)
Action Requested: �
Appmve the assessment for constmction of sidewalk and perforated drai� tile system at 546 and 552 Mount Cucve Boulevard as
requested by the property owners in connection with the Griggs/Jefferson RSVP project.
FileNo.S0904 AssessmentNo.010773
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): personal Service Contracts Must Mswer the Following questions:
Planning Commisslon �. Has this person/firtn everworked under a contract for this department?
CIB Commiltee Yes No
Civif Se�vice Commission 2. Has this person/firm ever been a ciry employee?
Yes No
3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normaily possessed by any
curtent city employee?
Yes No
F�cplain all yes answers on separate sheef and attach to green sheet
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Ratifica6on is necessary in order to begin collecting assessments to help pay for the project.
Advanfages if Approved:
Same as above.
Disadvantages If Approved:
Property owners wilt have assessments payable via property ta�es.
Disadvantages If NotApproved:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistant with city policy.
Total Amnuat nf
Transaction: $�� CosURevenueBudgeted:Y
Funding Source: ASSBSSIf1BfIfS Activity Number:
Financiai Information:
(ExPlain) � � � � � �
6
I�F§t i C' [li��
May 14, 2009 11:46 AM Page 1 ��� #"�aa��f ��re�s
�
"
i � i � i
o lo la I
I� I� I
— I M I ri �
N N
� I N I N I
I � I W I
' I � �
� O O
0 I C i O I
a. �� I� I
� I� Ie° I
� I I I
I I {
� I�o S �oS o �
a I� ; � I�a �^ I
� I��' � 1��' � I
� I I I
� I I I
I I I
I O O I C O I
R I n� I n � I
I � I � I
I I I
I � �
� I O O I O O I
a I .r .-� I .r I
� I I I
� � � �
� � �
I I I
I O� I p y I
�c: I `w I
� I� � lY�� I
g c E c E
'� I � � �� � �
°' I � � 'd � � h �
E � � � � � � �
Y ��a ��a �
�I � I I
I w `^ I o I
lwoo lo� !
I`°c-�".�w I�o I
o � z � � � O w �
� � W N' �Zm {
� � W O �'"a �' �
ca 1, I�
;. I��oN fa� 1
� �Q[-E-x I¢F�.� �
� ��00� ��Oo�
� � �
� � �
� � �
� � �
� � F �
Q x Q
� ����,I �>�a�,l
p O 3m��Oo
I W �' o
a I r/ z �� fx N I(-. F 7.�-. � N I
c6 I W O a V�i U N I x� j v�i U N I
v�
F tQ % I U z E,U, �' o � c�.' `t �� F" o
� f„ .�¢�a.�� "����a� �)
� �W'�'O�� � �q Oa� K�
3 I aQ`O �'� °c ' I 4�� o• � °��'
O �'cL ',Z v�'i v �: � q q� r *:�
�
Q
R
�
r
r
O
�
Q
a
O
�
V
N
O
a`
a on
�
.�
x
�
�
d
4
�
v
m
0
a
�`
a
0.
O
�
�
a
v
N
�
0 0
0 0
� �
� �
69 N
�
�
� o
w �
�w
�a o
� �
N �/
;� x
w3
m °J
N a
� �
� Y
E- E
0
0
M
M
6H
Y
i
:°• p.
0
E+ " p,
d
a�i s a�i
" R 1<
� aw
F. N O
09-759
�
�
f
I
�
V
�
�