09-537Coancil File #— i��
Green Sheet # 307 0�{ O l
��
Presented by
„
1 BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul, based on a review of the legislative
2 hearing record and testimony heard at public hearing on May 6, 2009 hereby memorializes its decision to
3 certify and approve the Apri130, 2009 decision of the Legislative Hearing Officer for the following
4 address:
6 ADDRESS
8 1751 Bush Avenue
APELLANT
Dennis Peabody
10 Decision: Appea] granted for the Vehicle Abatement Order; appeal denied for the Summary Abatement
11 Order and extension granted to May 13, 2009 to bring into compliance.
Yeas Nays Absent
Carter ✓
Bostrom ,�
Harris ✓
Helgen J
Lanriy `
Stark r /
Thune „i
� .�-
Adopted by Council: Date ��aG��(�-r/
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
C
g � i
Appro e y yo� ate ��— 7
By:
RESOLUTION
PAUL, MINNESOTA
Requested by Department of:
�
Form Approved by City Attomey
By:
Form Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
�
� Green Sheet Green Sheet
Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet
/��I-L����
�
DeparhnenUOfficelCouncil: Date Initiated: � �
co-�°°°��� 13-MAY-09 Green Sheet NO: 3070401
CoMact Person & Phone: Department SenF To Person 4nitiallDate
Marcia Moermond � ^��� 0
6-857� 1 omcH De artmen[ Director
Assign Z �p•Clerk Ci Clerk
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): Number 3 �
For 4 0
Routing
Doc. Type: RESOLUTION ��def 5 O
E-DOCUment Required: Y
Document Contact: Mai Vang
ConWct Phone: 6-8563
Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature)
Action Requested:
Resolution memodalizing Ciry Council action taken May 6, 2009 granting the appeal for the Vehicle Abatement Order and denying
the appeal for the Surrmiary Abatement Order and extension granted to May 13, 2009 to bring into compliance for properiy at 1751
Bush Avenue, per the recommendation of the Legislative Aearing Officer.
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Answer the Following Questions:
Planning Commission 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this departmenl?
CIB Committee Yes No
Crvil Service Commission 2. Has this person/irm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
AdvantageslfApprovad:
DisadvanWges IfApproved:
DisadvanWges If NotApproved:
Total Amount of
Trensaction: CosURevenue Budgeted:
Funding Source: .4ctivity Number:
Financiat l�ormation:
(Explain)
May 13, 2009 10:31 AM Page 7
.z, a
R ;2
0 j;
�,� i1li�il� i �
�
April 22, 2009
Dennis Peabody
1751 Bush Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55106
RE: 1751 Bush Ave.
Dear Mr. Peabody:
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
O� `���
Your application for an appeal has been received and processed.
t� �, 30 `il�.��
Please attend the public hearing before the Legislative Hearing Officer on �es�ay, April 30,
2009 at�-a.m. in Room 330 City Hall and Courthouse to consider your appeal concerning
the above referenced property. At that time the Legislative Hearing Officer will hear all parties
relative to this action. Failure to appear at the hearing may result in denial of your appeal.
Sincerely,
.���,ll�t� G i���
�-�
Shari Moore
City Clerk
cc:
Paula Seeley, Code Enforcement Qfficer
Marcia Moermond, Legisiative Hearing Officer
Jerry Hendrickson, Deputy City Attorney
15 LVEST KELLOGG BOULEVARD, SUITE 310 SAINT PAiJI, MINNESOTA55102 Tel: 651-26(r8688
Fac:651-ffi68574 wws»stpaul.gov
M Affumative Action Equal OpportuniTy Employer
D�
APPLICATION FOR APPEA����,���
Saint Paul City Clerk
15 W. Kellogg Blvd., 310 City Aall �.p� L L �QQ�
Saint Paul, Nlinnesota 55102
Telephone: (6�1) 266-8688 �1T�' CLERK
Address of Property being Appealed:
j C� I:,�;v1 N�C
s, . �a�L rr,.,� ss/o(
2. Number of Dwellin� Units: I 3. Date of Letter Appealed:
4. NameofOwner: �C`�'*'�� �C��onY
Address: �� 5 ` � � S �t �� City: 5 � � a �L State: n'' ^-' Zip: 5 5� c, 6
i
PhoneNumb usiness Residence Cellular 6 3S`'� �j�'
Signature: '�C/-2�+v.,�..
5. Appellant / Applicant (if other than owner):
Address: City: State: Zip:
Phone Numbers: Business Residence Cellular
�Signature:
6 State specifically what is being appealed and why (Use an attachment if necessary):
r'I(,y� CY-� �� �IC �J � O� 7��✓G �'�/ Pi rl"��
_ �OvjvT�'�. T.{'( �5 f�'�v O���Cr /� �Tl OC{�SO^J
J�C TO LGu.� �N?C i(Z���623 /jn-0 Sc,:�{ ��C-�v Sg��
rr' L �i T(Luz�t wbh� c�/ �S fi�9� Kc�O a.✓ l�i2Avtc. �y �,� v�c.,f�.�
levSy�C�Tu6Z wa,�� ��L TRa��-�S, 7lL�cx �r�J �Hr�cc-s /�C
�jOtt'� t3�1 1��(t�i / ��J�/ � � wAr�i �/ So 'yo� cqv
o:<.N , ��o,(�C(z-��/ ��o � w��� mcvC ;c R FI�CETowR/ 9�
�w� r(�om (�,c�A�o 2S
NOTE: A$25.00 filing fee made payable to the City of Saint Paul must accomnany this application as a
necessary conditxon for filing. You must attach a copy of the original orders and any other correspondence relarive
to this appeal. Any person unsatisfied by the final decision of the City Council may obtain judicial review by
timely filing of an action as provided by law in Dishict Court.
For Office Use Only �
Date Received: Fee Received: Receipt Number: Date of Hearing:
�/:�,���a`�
Revised 4/252007
SAINT
PAU'L
�
AAAA
CTTY OF SAINT PAUL
DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY AND INSPECTIONS
DIVISION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT
375 Jackson Street, Suite 220
Saint Paul, MN 55101-1806
VEHICLE ABATEMENT ORDER
Dennis 7 Peabody
1751 Bush Ave
StPaul MN 55106-4213
Apri115.2009
Inspection
�
' ea _ (in:c)
09 - 054114
0 � -�3��
Yog Lais tias koj Lais lus Hmoob thiab koj tsis w taub tsab mawv no, hu mu tus Wiais lus ntawm (651) 266-8989. Nws yog pab dawb zwb.Si necess�ta un trnductor,
por Savor llamanos al (651)2668989. No costo. '
As owner or person(s) responsible for 1751 BU5H AVE
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT THE FOLLOWING VEHICLES ARE IN VIOLATION
O�'i'FIE $AIt�T PAUL LEGISkATIVE
#1
Ford
Violation
A, E
#4
VIOLATION CODE: A- Lacks current
B - Open to enhy/unsecured
C - Missing vital parts/dismantled
GHAPTERS 45, OR 763:
#2
#5
D - Appears undriveabie
E - Unimproved surface
F - Other violation
FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULTS IN TAGGING AND/OR TOWING.
#3
#6
CHARGES: If the City impounds and disposes of the velucle(s), the charges assessed to the above
property will be approgimately $1,000.00 for each vehicle. This charge does not include impound fees
and other related costs for release of vehicle(s).
Velucles found to be in violation on or after April 27, 2009 will be removed, impounded and disposed of in
accordance with law. The cost of tlus abatement will be charged against the property as a special assessment to be
collected in the same way as property taaes. Noncompliance with this order and repeat violations will result in the
issuance of criminal citation
Issued by: Paula Seeley Badge Number: 364 Phone Number: 651-266-1916
Anneals: You may appeal this order and obtain a hearing before the City Council by complering an appeal applicarion with the Ciry Clerk before the
appeal deadline noted above or seven (7) days after rhe date mailed, whichever wmes first No appeals may be filed after that date. Yov may obtain
an appeal applicarion from the City Clerk's Office, Room 310, Ciry Hall, St. Paul, MN 55102. The telephone number is (651) 266-8688. You must
submit a copy of this Vehicle Violation Norice with your appeal applicarion.
'*WARNING Code inspec6on and enforcement trips cost the taxpayers money. If mulriple trips within a yeaz to your properiy are required to insure
eompliance with the ]aw, you may be charged for the cost of inspections and enforcement trips to yow properiy. Such chazges aze in addifion to any
other fines or assessments which may be levied against you and your property.
Va2 p2 60159 09/08
� � w. lJ..`n
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
DEPAR"I'MENT OF SAFETY AND INSPECTIONS
DIVISION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT
375 Jackson Street, Suite 220
Saint Paul, MN 55101-1806
SUMMARY ABATEMENT ORDER
Anri115.2009
lion te
Dat M '
/
M Y )
09 - 054114
Yog hais tias koj hais lus Hmoob tiriab koj tsis to taub tsab ntawv no, hu rau ws txLais lus ntawm (651) 266-8989. Nws yog pab
dawb zwb.Si necessita un iraductor, por favor llamanos al (651)266-8989. No costo.
Dennis J Peabody
1751 Bush Ave
St Paul MN 55106-4213
�hc�"`��p��e, b�j-���
�.(zC� ��
3�0 ���� ��'��
As owner or person(s) responsible for: 1751 BUSH AVE you are hereby ordered to eliminate all '
nuisance condifions which are in viola6on of Chapter 45 of Saint Paul Legislative Code.
� Remove improperly stored or accumulated refuse including: gazbage, rubbish, discarded furniture,
appliances, velucle parts, scrap wood and metal, recycling materials, household items, building
materials or rubble, tires, brush, etc., from yard areas. ( Including metal fencing, tires, wood,
buckets, metal gates, re-cycling, all improper storage under tarps and in the trailers)
� Other: Remove the several trailers wluch are parked on an un-proved surface in the rear yard.
If you do not correct the nuisance or file an appeal before April 27, 2009, the City will correct the nuisance and chazge all
costs, including boarding costs, against the properry as a special assessment to be collected in the same way as property tases.
Chazees: If the City corrects the nuisance, the charges will include the cost of correction, inspection, travel liwe, equipment,
eta The rate will be appro�mately $260.00 per how plus expenses for abatement.
You must maintain the premises in a clean condition and
provide proper and adequate refuse storage at all times
FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN A CRIMINAL CITAT�ON
Zssued by: Paula Seelev Badge Number 364 Phone Number 651-266-1916
If you have any questions abouY this order, the requirements or the deadline, you should
contact the Inspector listed above, Monday through Friday.
Aoneals� You may appeal this order and obtain a hearing before the CiTy CommcIl by completing an appeai applicacion with the CiTy Clerk before the
deadline noted above or seven (7) days after the date mailed, wbichever comes fust. No arooeals wav be filed after ttiat date._You mav obtain an aon
Cosechon Order with vour anoeat awlicatlon.
'WARNING Ccde inspection and enfoccement trips cost ihe taxpayeis money. If the violadons are not colrected within the time period required in this
notice, the ciTy's costs in conducring a reinspecdon after the due date for compliance vrill be collected from the ovmer rnther thap being paid by the tacpaye�s of
the ciry. If additicaal new violations are discovered within ihe next following 12 months, the ciry's costs ia conductiag additionai inspecaons at tUis same
locarion within such 12 moaths will be collected from fhe owuer rather than being paid by the tacpayeis of the ciTy. Any such future costs will be collected by
assessment a° ina tLe real pmperty and aze m addirion to any other fines or assessmerns which may be Ievied against you and your property.
Sa2 p2 60158 03l09
Excerpu from City Of Saint Paul Lea slauve Code
RE: Pazlang
Sec. 34.08. Eaterior propertv areas. � ��� �
The owner of any premises regulated by This sectioq as specified in section 34.03, shall comply with ihe following requirements:
(7) Parked or stored vehicles. All pazking spaces shall be paved wiih aspk�alt, concrete or other durable, dustless surfacing, or
with crushed rock as determined by the enforcement officer. Before auy existing spaces may be paved, site plan approval must
be obiained as speciSed in the Saint Paul Zoning Code and the loc must be developed in conformance vrith such approval.
Sec. 60Z17. P.
Parldng. The placement of automobiles, trucks, �aileis, seuuuailers, intermodal cazgo containers, or other vehicles for five (5)
or fewer days.
Parkingfaciliry, off-street. Al] azeas, spaces and structures designed, used, required or intended to be used for the pazldng of
more than three (3) motor vefucles. Ttus definition is intended to include adequate driveways, accessways, pazking bays,
gazages, of a combination thereof, but does not include public roads, streets, highways and alleys.
Parking space. An azea of definite length and width designed for pazldng of motor vehicles; said azea shall be exclusive of
drives, aisles or entrances giving access thereto.
Sec. 61.402. Site plan review (all districts).
(a) Plan to be submitted. A site pian shali be submittzd to and approved by tne planning commission befure a pern;! is issued ior
grading or the erection or enlazgemeat of gross floor azea for any development except one- and two-family dwellings, but
including the following:
(10) All off-street parking faciliries except as noted in section 63202.
Sec. 63.202. Site plan required.
A site plan approved by the planning commission skiall be required for the establishment of a new off-street paridng faciliry, for
the paving of an unimproved off-sReet pazldng faciliry and for the repaving of an off-street parking facility whose existing paved
surface is removed. These faciliries shall meet all standards and rea lations for parking faciliries and site plans contained in this
zoning code, and all paving shal] require a building permit pursuant to chapter 33 of the I,ea slarive Code. A site plan shal] not
be required when a new coating is applied over an existing paved surface. Site plans for one- to four-family dwellings may be
approved by the mning adminisirator.
Sec. 63312. Setback.
Except as otherwise provided in section 66.442(c) or section 66.431(b) off-street puking spaces shall not be within a required
front or side yard and shall be a minimum of four (4) feet from any tot line. For housing on Irvine Avenue, a guest pazMng space
may be provided on the driveway or elsewhere. If it is provided elsewhere, a guest pazking area is esempt from setback
requirements for parking spaces and it may be paved with gravel.
Sec. 63316. Paving.
All pazking spaces, driveways and off-street pazking facilifies shatl be paved with asphalt or other durable, dustless surfacing or
of material comparable to the adjacent street surfacing in accordance with other specifications of the zoning administrator. The
parking azea shai] be paved within one (1) yeaz of the date of the permit except as provided in secrion 61.402(e).
Sec. 63.501. Accessory buildings.
Accessory buildings, except as othenvise provided in this code, shall be subject to the followin� reeulations: -
(b) Accessory buildings, structures or uses shall not be erected in or established in a required yazd except a rear yard. Passenger
vehides may be pazked in front yards providing they aze located on an approved driveway that leads to a legai pazldng space.
On corner lots, accessory buiidings, structures or uses shal] be set back from the street a distance equal to that required of the
principal shvcture.
When an accessory building, structure or use is constructed in a reaz yazd which adjoins a side yazd or front yazd, the accessory
building, structure or use shalt be set back from the interior lot line a distance equal to the minimum side yazd required of the
principal shvcture.
Sec. 65.910. Accessory use or accessory.
A building shucture or use which is clearly incidental to, customarily found in connection with, and (except as provided in
section 63.300) ]ocated on the same zoning lot as, the principat use to which it is related.
V✓hen "accessory" is used in the trat, it shall have the same meaning as "accessory use."
An accessory use includes, but is not ]united to, the follovring:
(a) Accessory off-street pazking spaces, open or enclosed, subject to the accessory off-street pazking regulations for the district in
which the zoning lot is located.
Date:
File #:
Folder Name:
PIN:
April 15, 2009
09 - 054114
1751 BUSH AVE
272922440041
HP District:
Property Name:
Survey Info:
������
Date:
File #:
Folder Name:
PIN:
April 15, 2009
09 - 054114
1751 BUSH AVE
272922440041
FIP District:
Property Name:
Survey Info:
v � -53 -�
Date:
File #:
Folder Name:
PIN:
April 15, 2009
09 - 054114
1751 BUSH AVE
272922440041
HP District:
Property Name:
Survey Info:
� �� 53�
Date: April 15, 2009
File #: 09 - 054114
1751 BUSH AVE
PIN: 272922440041
Folder Name:
HP District:
Property Name:
Survey Info:
0�-53�
Date:
File #:
Folder Name:
PIN:
April 15, 2009
09 - 054114
1751 Bi35H AVE
272922440041
HP District:
Property Name:
Survey Info:
d�-�3�
Date:
File #:
Folder Name:
PIN:
April 15, 2009
09 - 054114
1751 BUSH AVE
272922440041
HP District:
Property Name:
Survey Info:
b�l �/->�j7
Apri130, 2009 Legislative Hearing Minutes D � 5 �� Page 10
10. Appeal ofDennis Peabody to a Summary Abatement Order and Vehicle Abatement Order
for property at 1751 Bush Avenue.
Dennis Peabody, appellant, appeazed.
Ms. Moermond asked for a report from Inspector Seeley. Ms. Seeley stated that a complaint was
received on April 9 regarding garbage/rubbish in the backyard. She inspected the property on April
15 and issued orders to remove excessive refuse and two over-sized trailers with improper storage
from the yard with a compliance date of Apri127. She also issued orders to remove a vehicle which
had expired tabs and was parked on an unimproved surface. She presented pictures of the property.
Mr. Peabody stated that he was retired and disabled and took care of his neighbors yards by mowing
and removing snow. He said that he had talked to Mary Montgomery in Zoning and since he had
provided an affidavit from his neighbor indicating that he had gravel for a parking surface since
1972, he was grandfathered in and allowed to have gravel for a driveway. He said that he intended
to add more gravel to the surface this summer. He presented a copy of the letter from Ms.
Montgomery along with the affidavit of verification from his neighbor. He said the vehicle listed
on the order was not a Ford and he also had current tabs on the vehicle. He presented a picture of
the license tabs on the vehicle which were current.
Ms. Seeley confirmed that the vehicle was now in compliance. She said that she had also confirmed
with Mary Montgomery that Mr. Peabody was approved to park on the gravel in front of the garage
doors, off the alley. She said that the trailers were over-sized and were not parked on approved
surfaces and according to the code, he could not park them all over the yard. She said that one of
the trailers appeared to have wheels on it which would also not be allowed. She also said that the
only approved parking surface would be pavers, asphalt or concrete and would be subject to site
plan review for approval.
Mr. Peabody responded that he was working with Mary Montgomery on a site plan for his trailers.
He said he did not have room in his garage far the stuff on the trailers that he had outside. He said
the boat trailer was approximately 6 by 12 feet, did not have wheels on it, it was on concrete and
was used to store two canoes, a crawdad, a row boat, and a chair for a deer stand. He did have a
tarp covering it until one of the neighbors' trees fell on it and destroyed the tarp. He used another
one of the trailers which was approximately 5 by 7 for hauling his lawnmowers, rototillers, snow
blowers and used another trailer for recycling materials. He said that there was a trailer which he
planned to cut up and dispose of sometime this summer.
Ms. Moermond reviewed the summary abatement order which included the standard violation
language with the addition of the following: remove metal fencing; tires; wood; buckets; metal
gates; recycling; all improper starage under tarps and in the trailers, and remove several trailers
which are parked on an unimproved surface in the rear yard.
Mr. Peabody stated that the fencing was going to be used on an 80 acre garden plot a guy was going
to let him use in Wisconsin. He said all of the fencing material would be gone within the next
couple of weeks as it was too muddy to take it and put it up right now.
Apri130, 2009 Legislative Hearing Minutes Page 11
b � �537
Ms. Moermond asked Ms. Seeley to explain the photographs and indicate which trailers were
allowed. Ms. Seeley indicated that she had concern with the trailer with the boats on it which
appeared to have wheels on it, as well as the large green box which had wood on top of it and
appeared to be used for storage. She said there was also a large, red commercial vehicle which she
believed was overweight and would not be allowed to be stored there. The little lawn trailers would
be allowed; however, all of the excessive starage would need to be removed as there was so much
stuff she could not maneuver around the backyard. She believed Mary Montgomery was scheduled
to inspect the property for zoning review.
Mr. Peabody asked what gave an inspector the right to come onto private property. Ms. Moermond
responded that the Legfslative Code allows inspectors to go on properties to inspect. Mr. Peabody
responded that he wanted the inspectors to stay out of his yard because it was a private yard.
Ms. Moermond recommended granting the appeal for the Vehicle Abatement Order as it in
compliance. She recommended denying the appeal on the Summary Abatement Order and granting
an extension to the close of business on May 8 to bring the property into compliance.