09-423City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT
COUNC NO. �` ����
BY ' ��
File No. S0803
Assessment No. 0769
Voting Ward
Green Sheet No. ��1�� �� ��
In the Matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for construction of a new sidewalk on the south
side of East Geranium Avenue from Payne Avenue to Greenbrier Street at 1115 Greenbrier Street only.
Preliminary Order: 09-71 approved 1/21i09
Final Order: 09-193 approved 2l18/09
WHEREAS, A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and
said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally
satisfactory; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby deternuned to be payable in
twentv equal installments.
Yeas Na s Absent
Bostrom ,i
Carter �
Harris ,i
Hel en
Lan
Stark ,�
Thune ;i
�
Adopted by the Council: Date: �/i�/d5'
Certified Passed by the Council Secretary
BY i td
�
Mayor
City of St. Paul
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT
courrca, r-� No. b 9 �/�-�
I'.��
File No. S0803
Assessment No. 0769
Voting Ward
Green Sheet No. J �� �
Tn the Matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for construction of a new sidewalk on the
North Side of St. Anthony Avenue from North Griggs to North Lexington Parkway.
Preliminary Order: 09-71 approved 1/21/09
Final Order: 09-193 approved 2/18/09
To the Council of the City of Saint Paul:
The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of
the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total constmction costs
Engineering and Inspection
Valuation and Assessment Services
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Charge To:
Net Assessment
TOTAL
$ 2,045.00
$ 614.00
$ 186.00
$ 2,845.00
$ 2,845.00
$ 2,845.00
Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and levied the total
amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $ 2,845.00 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of
land deemed benefited by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in
accordance with the benefits confeired thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto
attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made a part hereof, is
the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action
thereon as may be considered proper.
Dated
(
�- i 9-0 9 ��.����
t�C1 Valuation and Assessment Engineer
�� .
���b�r� �a��n� �l�s/o9
� Green Sheet G een Sheet Green SFfeet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
Deparbnentl0fficelCounciL• � Date IniGated: .
�J�� .
; FS -F��a���a�SeM�s ,9_FEB-o9 Green Sheet NO: 3067046
, Contact Person & Phone:
� Nlan Ccaia
26
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date):
15-APR-09
Doa Type: PUBLIC HEARING
(
� E-Document Requiretl: Y
'i Document Contact: Lynn Moser
i Contact Phone: 26Cr8851
y
Assign
Numher
For
Routin9
Order
0 Fivantial Servicu '
1 CounN ' MarvEricWon
2 Ciri Clerk SLari Moore
3
4 ;
5 '
Total $ of Signature ➢ages _(Clip All Lncatinns for Sigrtature)
Action Requested:
Approval of assessment for conshuction of a new sidewalk on the south side of East Geranium Avenue from Payne Avenue to
Greenbrier Sheet at 1115 Greenbrier Sheet only.
File No. S0803 Assessment No. 0769
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject {R):
Planning Commission
qB Committee
Civil Service Commission
Personal Service Contracts MustAnswer the Following Questions;
t. Has this persoNfirtn everworked under a contract for this department?
Yes No
2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does tfiis perso�rm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating ProBlem, lssues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Ratification is necessary in ordet to begin collecting assessments to help pay for this project.
Advantages If Approved:
Same as above.
DisadvanWges If Approved:
Property owner will have assessment payable via property tvices.
i DisadvantagesNNotApproved:
� To not assess the benefit would be inconsistant with City policy.
�
Total Amount of $Z g45.00
Trensaction:
Funding Source: ASS2SSm2f1iS
Financial lnformation:
(Explain)
Cost/Revenue Budgeted: Y
Activity Mumber:
February 19, 2009 12:53 PM Page 1
N
W
4
a
i5
�
F
m
�
n
0
a
H
S
m
a
0
m
ri
0
M
H
ti
I � I
1 �
Q � N
H � O
N � N
N � � +
a��H
W � N A.
O� � N ,�
O � W
a��x
a�ryw
� � r
m
� N
I
U} 1 O O 11 O
H� O O II O
Z �II �
,7 � O� tp 11 N
O i u� N II c
� ; l9 rl II m
-[? II
� N II N
a � vr n� i
O � i�
E � n
U � A
a� ��
w � n
mioo
H�oo
H t O O
� + O O I
i ti � i
a i �
O �
E
U i
4�
w �
w � o 0
H�oo
aioo
a�
���
E in m
H �i l0 ri
� � N �
' I I
I
I
I
�nW
� � W
I U W
W � W
� ; Qi w 1
Z � .'Y. H
a>
a�cex �
o�3w
F � W rn �
U�q i
�HW
w��na
N F W
� � q O O
�H �m �a �
�u oz�a rorNo
� oN w ��u� �
2 � w .-+>w �oam F �
o�x Nw ��aNFo
H � � Y.q�m[]�G'mwa �
W � O .]�nhH2�nHOq �
�� F o7 z Q� O FC O �� Z M i
f�
v�z �� m x�
m � o ra�Na'wwha �
Q � f+.70 �.
� i-+ � .] x .] .7 N .] IR <n �
`r� I qL4 �d'2��zA� v�i W F �
(d � r1 W V O F .] O�
W� • m r1E Oh qo i.7,-a �
o � "' ��na y h a ��a M �a ��
W � z
�� w O i- A��� � FC 7 E�
� woa�r�m�,xN
�
�
�
� x �
�� �
i H i
� .� o i
� zUHN�
w � W x`��a �
N� m F cL o W•
FC � .7a W.yH W
a � aa��,ao �
�� x 4 z 2 W�
�2UWSW �
i
O i-a W a L7
° � �w�a
CC � 2U' RC�1❑ I
w � H �na.�2
� � �p.�H�-
O W,-+�� x �
0 o n o
0 o il o
•11
m � II N
tn w II C
io ri II m
- Lr 0 -
N II N
� u m
u
u
u
u
i
u
u
u
u
��
��
zwii
O W n
uwn
awii
U II
k H II
a>na
v FL I! a'
3 W n E
q�ii�
H [x] II
�n a u F
II U
aanw
aa��h
F E n O
O O n fk
F E n a
m
a
w
a
a
E
a
w
W
ti
�
a
w
U
�
a
H
b�l- �i0 /