Loading...
09-326Councit File # d -l /-..3�� Green Sheet #���! Y� RESOLUTiON PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented by �� 1 WHEREAS, adverse action was taken against the Massage Practitioner and Massage Center —B 2(Home Location) licenses held by Christopher J. Wallen d/b/a Recovery Massage (License ID 3#20060001235) for the premises located at 1650 June Avenue in Saint Paul by Notice of Intent to Suspend 4 Licenses dated February 20, 2009, alleging licensee failed to pay delinquent license and late fees of 5$259.0�, submit current certificates of General and Professional Liability insurauce, Proof of Affiliation 6 and a cunent list of massage practitioners operating on site with their license numbers; and 7 8 WHEREAS, the licensee did not respond to the Notice of Intent to Suspend Licenses to contest the 9 allegation, request a public hearing or pay delinquent license and late fees of $259.0�, submit current 10 certificates of General and Professional Liability insurance, Proof of Affiliation and a current list of 11 massage practitioners operating on site with their license numbers; and 12 13 WHEREAS, the Notice of Intent to Suspend Licenses stated that if the licensee failed to contest the 14 allegation, request a public hearing or pay delinquent license and late fees, submit current certificates of 15 General and Professional Liability insurance, Proof of Affiliation and a current list of massage practitioners 16 operating on site with their license numbers by March 2, 2009, that the matter would be placed on the 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 consent agenda to unpose the recommended penalty; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Massage Practitioner and Massage Center —B (Home Location} licenses held by Christopher 3. Wallen d/bta Recovery Massage are hereby suspended for failure to pay delinquent license and late fees. The licensee is also ordered to pay a matriz penalty of $500.00 for failure to subxnit current certificates of General and Professional Liability insurance, Proof of Affiliation and a current list of massage practitioners operating on site with their license numbers. Payment of such penalty sha11 be made within thirty days of the date of the adoption of this resolution. Requested by Deparhnent of: ��� Bv: ' �..�J �} 2�..� � Adopaon C�erti�fie by Cou�n Secretary BY� // /,//�7L1i/ //�%��,/L- Approved by May Date 3� ,? p f�� BY � �IAr,.. a,. � Form A�o� by Cit y At��ey BY� M J� � � / F rov d b or fo u sion Council By: � Green Sheet Green ��1-��� Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet � DepartmenUOffice/COUncil: Date Initiated: S � _ Dept of Safery 8� Inspections os-�naR-os Green Sheet NO 3067607 ContactPerson $ Phane: DeoartrneM Sent To Person InitiaVDate RachelTiemev � o coesate &ms eceons � 26fi-8710 1 t of Safetv & 7ns ecfions De anment Director Assign 2 " Attornev �� Must Be on Couneil genda by (D te): Number � 3 vos's Office Ma or/Assutant 18-MAR-09 � For �—� � Routing 4 ouncil �----{ Doc.Type:RESOWTION Order 5 i Clerk Ci Clerk E-0ocument Required: Y DocumentConWct: �ulieKraus Contact Phone: 266-8776 Totai # of Signaiure Pages _�Clip AJI Locations for Signatu�e) Action Requested: Approval of fhe attached resolufion to take adverse action against the Massage Practitioner and Massage Cenfer - B(Home Locarion) licenses held by Christopher I. Wallen d!b/a Recovery Massage (License ID #20Q60001235) foc fhe ptemises Iocated at 165o Juno Avenue in Saint Paul. Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Persanal Service Contracts Must Answer the Foflowing questions: Planning Commission 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? qB Commlttee Yes No Civil Service Commission 2 Has this person/firm ever 6een a city employee? Yes No 3. Does this person/firm possess a slall not normally possessed by a�y current city employee? Yes No Fxplain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet. Initiating Prohlem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why1: Licensee failed fo pay delinquent license and late fees of $259.00, submit current certificafes of General and Professional Liability insurance, Proof of Affiliation and a cun'ent lisf of massage pracfifioners operating on sife wifh fheir license numbers. Aftex nofificafion, licensee did nof cespond to the Notice of Intent to Suspend License. Adva�rtages IfApproved: License suspension and imposifion of $500.00 matrix penalty. Disadvantages ff Approvetl: Disadvantages H Not Approved: iotal Amount of Transadion: CostlRevenue Budgeted: Funding Source: Activify Numher; Financial lnformation: (E�lainj March 6, 2009 3:26 PM Page 1 d� �� OFFICE OF THE CITY AT1'ORNEY John J. Chor, CiryAttomey SAfNT PAV L CITY OF SA1NT PAUL � Civil Division Chnsfopher 8. Colemaq Mayor 400 CiTy Hall Telephone: 651 266-8710 15 West Keilogg Blvd Facsimile: 65l 298-5679 AAAR SaintPaul, Minnesota 55t02 February 20, 2009 NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUSPEND LICENSE Christopher J. Wallen Recovery Massage 1650 Juno Avenue St. Paul, MN 55116 RE: Massage Practitioner and Massage Center — B(Home Location) licenses held by Christopher J. Wallen d/b/a Recovery Massage for the premises located at 1650 Juno Avenue in Saint Paul LicenseID #20060001235 Dear Mr. Wallen: The Department of Safety and Inspections (DSI) has zecommended suspension of the Massage Practitioner and Massage Center — B(Home Location) licenses held by Christopher J. Wallen d/b/a Recovery Massage for the premises located at 1650 Juno Avenue in Saint Paul. The basis for the recommendation is as follows: On July 8, 2008, you were sent a letter from DSI stating that your Massage Practitioner and Massage Center — B(Home Locarion} licenses had expired on Apri17, 2008. As of today's date you now owe $259.00 in delinquent license and late fees. You were also asked to submit current certificates of General and Professional Liability insurance with a 30-day notice of cancellation and naming the City of Saint Paul as an additional insured, Proof of Affiliation and a current list of massage practifioners operating on site with their license numbers. You were given until July 28, 2008 to pay the delinquent license and {ate fees and submit the required insurance, proof of affiliation and employee information. As of today's date, neither the payment nor the required information has been received. AffiTiTl3tiVe ACtion Eaual nnn�rtunitv F.mnlnvrr o'� ��� Recovezy Massage February 20, 20�9 Page 2 In addition to the suspension of your licenses for non-payment of delinquent license and late fees per Saint Paul Legislative Code §310.05 (m) (2), the licensing office will also recommend a$5�0.00 matrix penalty for failure to submit required documents to maintain your license. At this time, you have three options on how to proceed: You can pay the $500.00 matrix penalty, license and late fees of $259.00 and submit the requested insurance, proof of affiliation and employee information. If this is your choice, you should send the payments and informarion directly to the Department of Safety and Inspections at 375 Jackson Street, Ste. 220, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1806 no later than Monday, March 2, 2009. Payment should be directed to the attention of Christine Rozek. A self-addressed envelope is enclosed for your convenience. Payment of the $500.00 matrix penalty, license and late fees of $259.00 and submission of the requested insurance, proof of affiliation and employee information will be considered to be a waiver of the hearing to which you aze entitled. If you wish to admit the facts but contest the penalty, you may have a public hearing before the Saint Paul City Council, you will need to send me a letter with a statement admitting the facts and requesting a public hearing. We wiil need to receive your letter by Monday, March 2, 2009. The matter will then be scheduled before the �ity Council for a public heazing to determine whether to impose the $500.00 matrix penalty and suspend your license. You wiil have an opporiunity to appear before the Council and make a statement on your own behalf. If you no longer wish to do business in the City of Saint Paul, you will need to send a written statement to that effect to the Department of Safety and Tnspections (DST), at 375 Jackson Street, Ste. 220, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1806 no later than Monday, March 2, 2009. Information should be directed to the attention of Christine Rozek. If you have not contacted me by that date, I will assume that you do not contest the imposition of the $500.00 matrix penalty and suspension of your license. In that case, the matter will be placed on the CounciPs Consent Agenda for approval of the recommended penalty. If you have questions about these options, please feel free to contact me at 266-8710. Sincerely, �0.� �� Rachel Tierney Assistant City Attorney cc: Christine Rozek, Deputy Director of D5I STATE OF MINNESOT ' ` �� �� � ss. AFFIDAVIT OF 5�.. dICE BY U.S. MAIL COi3NTY OF RAMSEY ) Julie Kraus, being first duly swom, deposes and says that on the 20'�' day of February, she served the attached NOTICE OF IN'TENT TO SUSPEND LICENSE by placing a true and correct cogy thereof in an envelope addressed as follows Christopher J. Wallen Recovery Massage 1650 Juno Avenue St. Paul, MN 55116 (which is the last known address of said person) depositing the same, with postage prepaid, in the United States mail at St. Paul, Minnesota. �ll�J� �� �t�U�i.'+l./ Julie Kraus Subscribed and swom to before me this 20�' day of Februazy, 2009 �� �� � � Nbtary Public RITA M. BOSSARD f DTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA MV COMNtl5510N EXPIRES JAN. 31. TO 1 0 Chapter 310. Uniform License Procedures Page 1 of 2 �%-�� m} Presumpfive penalties for ce�fain vio�ations. The purpose of this section is to establish a standard by which the city council determines the amount of fines, the fength of license suspensions and the propriety of revocations, and shall apply to aif license types, except that in the case of a violation involving a liquor Iicense § 409.26 shall apply where a specific violation is listed. These penalties are presumed to be appropriate for evesy case; however the council may deviate therefrom in an individual case where the council finds and determines that there exist substantial and compelling reasons making it more appropriate to do so. When deviating from these standards, the council shall provide written reasons that specify why the penalty selected was more appropriate. TABLE INSET: Type of Violation Appearance 1st 2nd 3rd 4th (1) Violations of conditions $500.00 fine $1,000.00 $2,000.00 fine Revocation placed on the license fine and 1�-day suspension (2) Violation of provisions of $500.00 fine $1,000.00 $2,000.00 fine Revocation the legisfative code relating fine and 10-day to the licensed activity suspension (2) Violation of provisions of the legislative code relating $500.00 fine $1,000.00 $z,000.00 fine Revocation to the licensed activity, fine and 10-day other than violations of the suspension food code (3) Failure to permit 5-day 10-day 15-day Revocation entrance or inspection by suspension suspension suspension LIEP inspector or police (4) Commission of a crime other than a felony on the 5-day Revocation premises by a licensee or �700.00 $1,500.00 suspension employee (5) Commission of a felony on the premises by a $2,000.00 Revocation n/a n/a licensee or employee (6) Death or great bodily 30-day 60-day harm in establishment suspension suspension Revocation n/a related to violation of law or license conditions (7) Failure to pay license Revocation fees (8) Critical violations under $1,000.00, 5- Revocation 331A $250.00 $500.00 day suspension (9) Non-critical violation $15�.0� $25�.0� $500.0� $1,000.00 under 331A (i) Fines payable without hearing . A. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 310.05(c), a licensee who would be making a first or second appearance before the council may elect to pay the fine to the Department of Safety and Inspections without a council hearing, unless the http:l/library4.municode.com/4472/DocView/1 006 1/1/3 1 7/3 1 8?hilite=310 05; 2/12/2009 Chapter 310, Uniform Licznse Procedures Page 2 of 2 /�9-��� notice of violation has indicated that a hearing is required because of circumstances which may warrant deviation from the presumptive fine amount. Payment of the recommended fine wifl be considered to be a waiver of the hearing to which the licensee is entitled, and will be considered an "appearance" for the purpose of determining presumptive penalties for subsequent violations. B. For adverse action initiated under Chapter 331A of th+s Code, a fine may be paid without a hearing regardfess of how many prior appearances that licensee has made before the Councii. The above council hearing requirement applies to violations under Chapter 331A unless the fine recommended by the Department of Safety and Inspections is equal to or less than the fine amount outlined in the above matrix. Payment of the recommended fine will be considered to be a waiver of the hearing to which the iicensee is entitled, and will be considered an "appearance" for the purpose of determining presumptive penalties for subsequent violations. A non-critical violation under chapter 331A shall not be considered an "appearance" for purposes of determining presumptive penalties for non-331A violations. A council hearing is required if the Department of Safety and Inspections recommends a fine that is an upward departure for the amount outiined above. http:/llibrary4.municode.com/4472/DocView/IOOblil/317l318?hilite=310 O5; 2I12/2009