09-262City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION RATIE'YING ASSESSMENT
COUNCIL FILE NO. Dy� �� �
By ���
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
��
0802LDSRP (4921) Replacement of Lead Water Service Lines as requested by the property
owner from July to December, 2008.
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above
improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and
having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects
ratified.
RESOLVED EURTEiER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to
be payable in One equal installments.
Yeas Nays Absent Adopted by the Council
Bostrom ,/ Date: �
Carter �
Harris ✓ Certified Passed by the Council Secretary
Helgen � By: i
Lantry �
r '
Stark �/ Mayor
Thune ,/
City o£ St. Paul
Real Estate Division
Dept.of Technology � Management Serv
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSt�NT
COUNCIL FILE N0. �� / ��
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
0802LDSRP (4921) Replacement of Lead Water Service Lines as requested by the property
owner from July to December, 2008.
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the
following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in
connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total costs
Water Dept Service Fee
DSI Administration Fee
Code - Enforcement Service Fee
Real Estate Service Fee
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Charge To
Net Assessment
$184,464.00
$ 3,080.00
$
$
$ 3,080.00
$190,624.00
$190,624.00
Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and
levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $190,624.00 upon
each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted by the said improvement,
and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits
conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto
attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer,
and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is
herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered
proper.
n
Dated: Valu�a 'on and ssessment E gineer:
�� ��� � �����
�to L�. tf�e ��{ - 3-y-D�
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet reen Sheet �
(l9 �.?<<2 0�''
OeparfinenUOfficelCouncil: Date In"diated: � '
FS - Financial Services 06-JAN-09 Green Sheet NO: 3065717
Contact Person & Pt9bn Oeoartment Sent To Person Initial/Date
Lynn Maser ',}� ��. � D �nancial Serricn L n Moser
266-8851� d - . ] oana7 M Erickson �
� 2 Clerk G Clerk '
Must Be on Council A enda by (Date): Number
3 � �� . �� For '
Routing
Doc. T OTHER (DOESNT FIT ANY Order
�� CATEGORY}
E•DOCUment Required: Y
Document Contad: �m Ranweiler
Confact Phane: 266�856 �
Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip AII Lowtions for Signature) �
Action Requested: _ ,
Set date of public hearing and approve assmts for replacement of lead water service as requested by the property owner from Juty to
December,2008.
File No. 0802LDSRP .
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Personal Serviee Contracts Must Answer the Following Questions:
Planning Commission �_ �}ry�s personlfirtn evet worked under a contractfnr this depaAment?
CIB Commiriee Yes No � _
Civi7 Service Commission 2. Has this person/firtn ever been a city empioyee?
Yes No
3. Does ihis persoNfirm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any
curtent city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Property owners replacing their lead water service connections have requested that the cost of the work be paid by assessment. Work
has been done, and City has paid for the work
Advanfages If Approved:
RaGfication of the assessments will allow City to begin recovering the cost of the work done.
�isaMantages If Approved:
None
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
City would not recover the money already paid out for the lead replacement work done.
Total Amou�t of $�90,624.UQ CosflRevenue Bud eted:
Transaction: 9
Funding Source: Activity Number.
Financiai lnformation: � � -
(Explain) 77 Property owners will be notified of the public hearing and chazges. .
January 6, 2009 3:09 PM Page 1