09-1374Council File #�G�����L-�
Green Sheet # �
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAWT PAU_L, MWNESOTA
Presented
`f3
WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul, Police Department has been awarded the 2009 Internet Crimes Against Children grant from
the Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; and
WHEREAS, this grant provides funds to support and enhance the Minnesota Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force
activities, including identification, apprehension and prosecution of child sexual predators. This gant will fund a full time
forensic examiner for the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, purchase updated forensic workstations and digital storage for
investigative purposes; and
WHEREAS, a 2009 financing and spending plan needs to be established for these funds; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor pursuant to Section ] 0.07.1 of the Charter of the City of Saint Paul, does certify that there are available
for appropriation funds of $120,000 in excess of those estimated in the 2009 budget; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor recommends that the following addition be made to the 2009 budget:
Current Changes Amended
Budget Budget
0436-Police Special Projects Fu�d
FMANCING PIAN
34243-20091CAC
3099-Other Federal Direct Grants In Aid
Total Changes to Fi�ancing
SPENDING PLAN
34243•2009 ICAC
0219-Fees-Other Professional
0253-Registration Fees
0370-Computer Equipment
0389-Other Miscella�eous
0848-Capitalized Equipment
Total Ghanges to Spending
o i2o,oao tzo,000
o �zo,000 i2o,000
0 5,000 5,000
0 1,000 1,000
0 5,000 5,000
0 25,000 25,000
0 84,000 54,000
o i2o,000 i2o,000
THEREFORE BB IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul Ciry Council approves these changes to the 2009 budget.
by �epa�n�nt of:
Adoption Certified by Council cretary
BY� ` f �
Approved by Mayor: Date � Ti 2 Z Q�_ _
BY� �M � �CICILF 1
By: °J (Y/ `�
Appr ed � ity At orney
By: _
Appro�ed or for Submiss'o to Co cil
By:
Adopted by Council: Date �-Z�/�/d -�/
e�
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
DepartmeM�OfficelCOUncit: - - � ' " Date fnitiated: - � �- - - � L. � J � �� �
PD � PoliceDepartment ' 06NOV2009 � GCeeCI S{1eEt NO 3087619
-�— �---- . . _ - - - - - - -� -- --'---- ----- - - - - � �- - - --
Contad Person & Phone: ' Deoartrnent Sent To Person _ Initial7Date
� ChiefJOhnHarrington o Parceueparm�ent_ _ , _ Poticeuepsrm�ent _ __ ___
266-5588 ', , 7�otice Departmeut _ � Police Department . _ L �
_ - _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ . _ _ ' AsSign 2 GtY Attomey f C�ty Attorney __ _ _ _. _
� Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): �� Number -- ` _' - � - - - - -� �
For � 3 F�nancial Services . _ D�recto s FSO _ _ _ _ _ _ ,
- - - -- - Routing �I 4 MayoYs �ce_ _ . '; Mayor_ _ '
, Doa Type: PUBLIC HEARING Order 5 CouncB_ __ _ Covncil _; __ __ _ ,
' (RESOLUTION) . � 6 ,_ _ _ CiryClerk __ _ __ _ ,
E-DOCUmentRequired: Y i 7,PoliceDepartrnent __ i �l _PoliceDepartment , j
�' Document Contack Evette Scarver ' '�,
, ConWCt Phoae: 266-5507 ' I �
�I ToW I# of Signature Pages ="� (Clip All Locations for Signature)�
.----- --- ---
' Action Requested:
j Sstablishing a financing aod spending plan for the 2009 Intemet Crimes AgainsY Childcen grant.
P � ` ' ' �YY N �� - i
�a� � 5 �aog — �'�
��;� g � �
1 i ���5"�'��� l i
-- - - --- - - � -
- -
; Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): � Personal Service Contrects Must Answer the Following Questions:
�I Planning Commission 1. Has this personlfirm ever worked under a conlract fof this depadment�
I GIB Committee I Yes No
�I Civil Service Commission � 2. Has ihis persoNS�rm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
I 3. Does this personffirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
� i curzent cRy employee?
�
� Yes No
i �
, 'I Explain alI yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet.
L . _ _ ___ __ _ _ __ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ __ -- _ __ ._- _ __ .
� lnitiati�g Problem, Issues, OppoRunity (Whq What, When, Where, Why):
I The 2009 Intemet Crimes Against Clilldren gi'ant will fund a full time forensic examiner for the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension,
I, purchase updated forensic workstations and digital stotage for investigative purposes. Authorization is needed.
i
-� - - - - -- -- - - - ---
h- - -- - -- -- -- -� - - -- -- ---- -- -- --- -� -- - - - -
' AdvanWges IfApproved:
� Ability to use grant funds consistent with tl�e 2009 ICAC gcant.
�-------'----- � --- - - � - � -- �-� -- - -
� DisadvanWgeslfApproved:
i None.
I
- ------------ - ----
rDisadvantages If Not Approved:
� Lost opportunity to use grant funds.
_ _ _. _______ __._ __ _.___-__ __ _.__ ._ __ ________9_ _ . ._ _ ___
_ ____.__ _._. -____-_ -_ -
'i Total Amount of
T[an5antion: $�20,000.00 CosURevenueBud etetl: i
� 436 Acciviry Numbec: 34243
� Funding Source: I
�' Financiallnformation: �
I iExpiain) �
- --- --- --- --- --�,
I
-- — — �
November 6, 2009 1.28 PM Page 1
� "'"'�- Departmen[of7usdce
�' ' Officeof7usticePrograms
' f:3 �=" Office of Juvenile Justice and
� " '�"'"' ' Deli¢quency Prevention
�, ,-�
� L RECIPIENT NAME AND ADDRESS Qncluding Zip Codc)
Ciry of Samt Paui
i ISW.Kc3bg�Btvd.
� Samt Paul, MN >SIO2
I
i
j IA. GRAMEE IRSNErDOR NO.
'i 416005521
r a. pROIECT T(TLE
� Mmnnsorz ICAC Pro�wt
Cooperative Agreement
�� 4_ A WARD NUMBEA: 2009-MGCX-KOi9
5 PROIECT CERIOD. FROM
BUDGET 4ER40D: PROM
� fi AWARDDATE 09Afi2009
I 8. SUPPLEMENT NUMBEA
� 00
_ I9.PR6V�OUSAWARDAMOUNT
�
10_ AMOUNT OF THIS AW ARD
� ll.TOTALAWARD
1
09-1374
ATTACHMENT A
� PAGE t OF i '
07107I2009 TO o6Ji012010 i
6i/01l2�09 TO �3020I0 '�
I
, 9_ACTIO� I
Imual
I i
I �
_____"' _' ' _ _ _'_ "
I2. SPECIAL CONDITIONS
TH6 ABOVE GRANT PR03ECT IS APPROVED SUBIECT TO SUCH CONDITIONS Oft LIMI7ATIONS AS ARE SET FORTH
ON THE ATI'ACHED PAGB(S).
_ _ -____ _'_ ' __ _ _ _ _ "_ _ " __
13. STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR GAANT
'IL�s pco�cct �s suppoRCd vndcr FY09 (OADP iCAC) USC 1761 Ll]fil7
]5. METHOD OP PAYMENT
PAPRS
SO
5 355,ffib
$ 355,R26
______ —'_"" _—_____ "— ."' _
�--AGENCYAPPROVAL_ — I — GR4NTEEACCEP7ANCE —
I6. TYpED NAME AND TITLE OP APPROVING OFFICIAL � I8. TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GRAMEE OFPICIAL
Mary Lou Leary I lohn Hamington
Acbngp.s,sismntqttomcyGencml � Ch�cfofPohcc
__--_—_____'____"_ ______{_'___'_—_ '_ ____
ll SIGNATUREOFAPPROVINGOPF(GAL I �q �GNATUREOFAUTHORIZEIlAECIPIENTOFFICIAL I l9A.DATE
'"4�..��1..�..., A.,,�e� , /� I % /,+3j
�
---- - - - --� � -- � --�. - - -- - �- - -- - - - ��/_��J f
AGENCY S ONLY
-_'_"_-' _._.__ ___- " - __' - � - _ -'-_'____.__"_ -_ -_ - ____ ___'--
20.ACCOUMING CLASSIFICAiION CODES I 2 �MCTGT08I4
FISCAL FUND BUD. DIV.
YEAR G06E ACT OFC R6G. SUB- 1'OMS AMOUNT �
X C MC J9 W 00 355626 �
O1P FORM 40002 (REV 5-8]) PKEVIOUS EDITIO�S AAE OBSOLETE.
OIP FORM 4000/2 (AEV 488)
,
Q ZGTUF,.� s_
p ���
� � _
`l.(
Departrnen[oFJustice �
Office oflusnce Programs �
Office of 3uvenile Justice and ',
Delinquency Prevention
AWARD CONTINUATION
SHEET
Cooperadve Agreement
,
09-1374
i
�AGE 2 OF 5
i
'— �PROJECTNUMSER 2W9-MGCX-K039 AWAADDATE 09!l62009 . � � �_� �
I SPECIAL CONDIT/ONS
� i. The recipient agrees to comply with the financiai and admimstrative requirements set forth in the current edition of the
I Oftice of Justice Programs (OlP) Financial Guide.
�� 2. The rec+pient acknow]edges that failure to submit an acceptable Equat Employment Opportuniry Plan (if recipient is
� requited to submit one pursuant [0 28 C.F.R. Section 42302), [hat is approved by the Office for Civil Righis, is a
i violation Of its Certified Assurances and may result in suspension or terminatton of funding until Such fime as Ihe
� cecipient is in compliance.
3. The tecipient agrees to comply with the organizational audit requirements of OMB Grcular A-133, Audits of Scates,
Local Govemments, and Non-Profit Organizations, and further understands and agrees that funds may be withhelb, or
other related requirements may be imposed, if ou4tandmg audit issues (if any) from OMB Circulaz A-I33 audits (and
any other audits of OJP grant (unds) aze not saiisfactorily and promptly addressed, as fucthec described in che current
edition of the OJP Financial Gmde, Chapter 19.
4. Recipient understands and agrees that it cannot use any federal funds, euher directiy or indirectly, m s�pport of the
enactment, repeal, modification or adoption of any law, regulation or policy, at any level of govemment, without the
exptess prior written approval of 03P.
5. Tha recipient must promptly refer ro the DOJ OIG any credib7e evidence tbat a principal, employee, agent, contrector,
subgrantee, subcontractor, or other person has either 1) submitted a false claim for grant funds under the F21se Claims
Act; or 2) committed a criminal oz civil violation of taws pedaining to fraud, conFlict of incerest, bribery, gratuity, or
similar misconduct involving grant funds. This conditio� also applies to any subrectpien[s. Potwtiai fraud, waste,
abuse, or misconduot shoWd be repomd to fhe OIG by -
mail:
dffice of the Inspectot Generni
U.S. Department of Justice
Investigations Division
950 Penosyivania Avenue, N.W.
Room A706
Washington, DC 20530
e-mail: oig.hotlineQo usdoj.gov
botline: (contac[ informahon in English and Spanishf. (860) 869<t499
or hotline fac; (202) 616-9881
Addi4onal information is avaiiabie from the DOJ DIG website at www.usdoj.gov/oi�.
6. The reCipient agrees to comply wrth the OJ7DP approved ICAC Task Force Opera[ional and Investiga6ve Standards
Z'(he rec�pient agrees to fotward repocts of iCAC Task Force Program Mon[hly Performance Measures to Ihe OJJDP-
designated site.
OIP FORM 4000/2 (AE V 48R)
I
I,
,�}�
V `�
�
09-1374
p ..C7 v�
T � f
Departmentof7usfice ;
O�Ce of lustice Programs �
Of£ce of Juvenile Jus6ce and '
Delinquency Prevention ;
3009-MGCX-K039
AWARD CONTINUATION
SHEET
Cooperative Agreement
AWAA7JDATE 09/I62009
SPECIAL CONDITIDNS
�� PAGE 3 OP 5
� 8. ICA Annual Reports
; The recipient agcees to submit annual repotts m OIP that set forth the following:
�, (A) Staffing levels of the task force, incinding the number of investigators, prosecuton, education specialisis, and
� forensiG specialisLS dedicated to investigating and prosecu[ing Intemet crimes against children.
I (B) Imestigation and prosecution perfarmance measures of the task force, including--
(i) the number of investigations initiated related to intemet crimes against childre�;
� (ii) the number of anests related to Intemet crimes against children; and
� (iii) the number of prosecuhons for Internet crimes against children, induding--
I (I) whetliec Che prosuution resulted in a convic[ion For such crime; and
� (Ii) the sentence and the statutory maximum for such crime under State law.
i (C) The number of teferrals made by [he task force [o the United States Attorneys office, including whether the refettal
I was accepted by the United States Attamey.
� (D) Sta[ishcs that accwnt for the disposition of investigations that do not result in artes4s or prosecutions, such as
j refenals to ot6er law enforcement.
(k� The �umber of i��vestigative technical assistance susions that the task force provided to nonmember law
i enforcementagencies.
� (F)'i'he numbet of computer forensic examinations that the task force completed.
I (G) The number of law enfomement agencies participating in Intemet crimes against children program standards
estab3ished by the tesk Some.
9. The Office ofJuvenile Justice and Deiinquency Prevention has elected to enter into a Cooperative Agreement rather
than a grant wi[h ehe recipient. Thi> decision reflects the mutual interest of Uie reapient and OJJDP in Ihe operation of
[he projec[ as well as [he anticipated ievel oFFedernl involvement in this project OJ1bP's participatory roie in the
pcojecf is as follows:
a. Review and approve major work plans, including changes to such plans, and key decisions pertaining to pro�ect
operations.
h. Review and appxove majox prOject generated dceuments and materials Used in the provision of project services.
Provida guidance in significan[ project planning meaNngs, and participate in project sponsored training events or
confere�ces.
10. Prior to the expenditure of confiden6al funds, the recipient and any subrecip�ents agree to sign a cenification indicanng
that he or she has read understands, and agrees [o abide by all of [he conditions pertaining [o confidential fund
expendiiures as set forth in the OJP Financial Guide.
11. The Project Director and key program personnel designated in the apptication shall be replaced only for wmpeNing
reasons and with the wncucrence of OJP. OJP will not unreasonably wi[hhold wncurrence. A�I successors to key
personnel musi be approved, and such approval is contingent upon submission of appropriate information, inCluding,
but not limrtPd W, a resume. Changes in other program personnel reqwre only notification to OJP and submission of
resumes, �nless otherxise designated in che awazd document.
12 No portion of these federal grant funds shall be used towardc any par[ of the annual cash compensation of any
employee of the grantee whose total annual cash compensa6on exGeeds I 10"/0 of [he maximum salary payable to a
member of the Federal govemmenYs Senior Exewtive Serv'rce at an agency with a Certifiad SE5 Performance
Appraisa! System for that year.
This prohibition may be waived on an mdividual basis at the discretion of the Assistan[ Attomey General for OSP.
OIP FORM 40002 (REV. 488)
I
I
��
�
09-1374
�- - - -- -,
"� DeparhnentoF7ustice ; �
OfficeoflusticePrograms AWARDCONTINUATLON �
�' Office of Juvenile Jusfice and .�' 5FIEET rnce a oF s j
' � ;
� _ Delinquency Prevention Cooperative Agreement
, '`-ti.��,. � - •
j �
i
I
,, PROIECr NUMBER 2009-MCLX-KO>9 AWARD DATE Q9llfi/2��9 � � � � � � � � � � . � � � �� �,
_ - I
�,___ _ _ _ __ " I
, SPECIAL CONDITIONS �
� 13. Grnnt Ponds may be u5ed only for the purposes in [he recipient's approved applicahoa The recipient shall not �
,� undertake any work or activities that are not described m the grant applicatioq and that use staff, equipment, or other �
� goods or servicu paid for with OSP grant funds, without prior written approval from OJP. �
�
I 14. No federal funds shall be used ro pay for any part of air travel that mcludes b�siness or first ciass seating except as �I
I authorized for govemment travei (as described in OMB Circular A-122) a�d authorized by the gran[ manager prior to I
baoking such tickets.
I�
I
�
O1P FORM 4000/2 (REV 4-RS)
et�`'''» �
a 3 T:
.r�:S:Y.'.-
i
Departmentof3usfice �
O�ce of Justice Programs !
Office of Juvenile Justice and ;
Delinquency Prevention I
AWARD CONTiNUATION
SHEET
Couperative Agreement
09-1374
rncE s oF s
I
I '� ---- -----
'i --- �-------------- � �---------- ---�--� -- -- -
, PROJECENUMSER 2009-MGCX-K039 AWARSJDATE 09/16P_009
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
' I5. Wi[hin 45 days aker the end of any conference, mee[i�g, retreat, seminar, symposium, [raining acfivity, or similar event
� funded under this award, and che fotal cost of which exceeds $2Q�00 in award funds, the recipient must provide the
, program manager with the following infortnation and itemized ws[s:
1) name of evenr,
�
i 2) eve�t dates;
3) Iocatiort of event;
4) numbec of fedeeal attendees,
5) number of oon-federal attendees;
6) costs of event space, mcluding rooms for break-out sessions;
7) cosrs of audio visual services;
8) o[her equipment costs (e.g., compuier fees, telephone fees);
9) costs of pnnting and d�stribution;
10) costs of inea{s provided during the event;
17 ) costs of refreshments prwided during the even[;
12) cosis of event planner,
13) oosts ofevent facilitetors; and
14) any other costs associated with the event.
The �ec�p�ent must also i[emize and renort any of Ihe following attettdee (mduding paeticipants, presente�s, speakers)
costs that are paid or reimbursed wi[h cooperative agreement funds:
1) meals and mcidental expenses (M&IE portion of per diem);
2) Iodging;
3j transportation to(from event Iocafion (e.g., common carrier, Privately Owned Vehicle (PO�); and,
4) (oCal traasportation (e.g., rental car, PQV) at event looa[ion.
i
Note that if any item is paid for with reguha.tion Cees, or any atHer non-awazd Cunding, then that portion of the expense �
does not need ta be reported. I
I
OJP will prov�de further ins4ucfions regarding [he submission of this data at a latet tirne. I
i
� I
O1P FORM 4000R (REV 488)
04-1374
� �"�* DepartmentofJustice
;
t � Office of Justice Programs
. °�...�.� �;
��-`" Office oJJuveirile Jvstice and DeZdnguency Prevention
Wosbngmn.DC 2053I
Memorandum To: Off'acial Grant File
From: Kathi Grasso, OJJDP NEPA Coordinator
Subject: Categorical Exclusion for City of Saint Paul
The recipient agrees to assist OJJDP to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
other related federal environmental impact analyses requirements in the use of these grant funds either
directly by the recipient or by a subrecipient. Accordingly, prior to obligating grant funds, the grantee
agrees to first determine if any of the following activities will be related m the use of the grant funds and,
if so, to advise OJJDP and request fuxther NEPA implementation guidance. Recipient anderstands that
this special condition applies to its activities whether or not they are being specifically funded with these
grant funds. That is, as long as the activity is being conducted by the recipient, a subrecipient, or any
U�ird party and the ac5vity needs to be undertaken in ordet to use these grant funds, this special condition
mast fixst be met. The activities covered by this speciai condition a�e: a_ new c�nstruction; b. minor
renovation or remodeling of a property either, (I) listed on or eligible for listing on ffie National Register
of I3istoric Places or; (2) located wiChin a 300-year flood plain; c. a renovation, lease, or any other
proposed use of a building or facility that will either; (I) result in a change in its basic prior use or; (2)
significantly change its size and; d. Impletnentation of a new progam involving the use of chemicals
other than chemicals that aze; (1) purchased as an incidental component of a funded activity and; (2)
traditionally used, for example, in of&ce, liousehold, recreational, or education environments.
r
� Departmentof7ustice
I - OfficeoFJUS[iceProgams
� r ' OfficeofJuvmileJusticeand
, ,` `4,;, `�^ Delinquency Prevention
�'
7LIS pro)ec[ a supponeA uvder FY09 (011DP ICAq USC 1 i67 L1761 ]
L
i 1_ STAFF CQNTACT (A'ame & tefephone oombe�)
I
WiIID Bronsov
j (202)305-2427
09-1374
�
f GRANT Mlu�'AGER'S MEMORANDUM, PT. L•
f PROJSCT SUMMARY
Cooperative Agreement
� RROJECTNUDIBER � � � -� � '� � ��
' PAGE 1 OF I �
� 2009-MGCX-K039 � '
' 2 PROIEQ DIRECTOR (Name, address & telephone number)
Amy Browo
'� Research And Granrs Managet
� ISW.KelloggStvd
� Samt Pa�l, MN 55101-2295
i (651)266-5507
_'_______ ____ _..__ '___ ___ __
3a. TITLE OF THE PROGAAM
OJJDP FY 091ntemet Crimes Agamst Children Task Force Rogrnn Continvauon
_'_— ___ — _"_ __.' _ _ _ . _ _ __ _ _ _
4. TITLE OF PROJECT
Mimwota ICAC ProJect
_ ' _ . _ . ' _ _ _._ _ _ _ _ _
I 36. POM3 CODE (SEE INS7RUCTIONS
' ONREVERSE)
i
�
�
_____ _—_'___ __'_____ . _._____ -_ -___-_ -,__'__-_ _____ __ --_-- ___'_ _ _ __._- _--____
5. NAME & ADDRESS OF GRANTEE fi. NAME & ADRESS OF SUBGRANTEE
Ciry of Saint Paul
SS W. Kellogg Blvd. I
Saint Paul, MN 55102
____'__ _.__-_'__-__-_-_____._ _ _._
7. PAOGRAM PERIOD
FROM. 0'1l01/2009 TO. 06f30l2�30
'_ ____'_ '_'_.___ . ___ _ _. _-_' ___ _
9.AMOUN70FAWARD
$ 335,826
11. SECOND YEAA'S BU➢GET
___.____. _ __
l3. THIIiD YEARS BUDGeT PERIOD
____ - _ _ __ _ _ _ --' _ _ _ ___ _ __'_ -_—_
8. BUDGET PERIOD
PROM� 07lOtY2009 TQ. ON3020t0
_ . ___-__'_--___'_-______'_'____—�_
10 DATEOFAWARD
09/16/20D9
L2. SHCOND YEAR'S 6UDGEC AbIOUNT
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ '_ _ _. _ ...
lA. THIRD YEAR'S HUDGET AMOUNT
__'._._"__'__ ___'_- ._--____ ' _ _ __ . __ _ __ _ I
I5. SUMMARY DBSCRIPTION OF PR07ECi (See mstruetim� an reverse)
Using OADP funds, the Saint Paul Polue Depaztment ICAC will h've a full tune forensic eumi¢er and pwchase updared foreusic workstxnons and dighat storage
for invesngative pvrposes. In addinon, fiese funds will allow for the purc6ase of imesngauve software and rover the costs of an mkme[ safety carn�a�gn.
Further, the Saint Paui Police Department wili contmue ro opeate �ts Intemet Cnmes Against Chddren pCAC) Task Force as pazt ofthe nanonallCAC progrem I
opemfed by OIIDP.
I
I
OSP FORM 4��012 (REV 488) _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ __ _ _�
09-1374
T6e Saint Paut Potice Departmeot tCAC Task Force, pursuant to Settion 104 of t6e PAOTECT A�v, shall — 1) wnast ofSUte and local
i¢vestiga[ors, prosecutors, Forensic spuialists, and education speCialis6 who are dedicatcd ro adkessi¢g the goak of (the) task force, 2) e�lgaSe in
proactive in�atiga[iorts, foreas�c examinaGO¢s, aud etTective pmsecunons oflntemet crimes agaws[ chlidreq 3) provide forensic, prevenrive, s.ud
investiganve assisrance ro parents, educaror, prosecutors, law enforceme.�4 �d otLer wncemed with lnreme crimes against children. A) develop
mulci)urisdiUionat, multiagen<y iespon�s a�d pazlnetsltips w Intemet crimtt againrt cpildrzn offensa llvou�h ovSo�S ��orma[iona4
admilusIIafive, and mchnological support co othet Sfate and lacal law enforceme¢t agesuies, u a mexos for such agencie: to acquire tite necessary
knowledgq personnel, aud sp�ialized equipmeni to investivafe and prosecute such offenses, 5) ryvtiapate in nationally coordioaced iovestiganons
m any case in which tbe Attomey Generzl derertnines such participa�ion ro be necessary, az permitted by Yhe availabM1e reso�uce of suc6 issk force;
� estsblisp or adopt investigative and prosecutton standards cons�stent w�th vo�ms, m wluch sucb tazk force sha17 comply; 7) in�esngate, and seek
prosecudon oq nps relazed m latemet cnves ageinst children, inciuding �iPS Irom Ope2tion Fa'vpiay, the Na6onal Ivtemet Crimes Agau�st
Children 4ata Sys�m, ttte Natiooat Cenrer fac Missing aad Exploaed GLildren's Cybu7�piine, ICAC task forrez aud otherFederal, Stam, avd
Iocai agencies, vrith prioriry being givenio investigace leads chac iadicafe possibility of identifying or ceccuing chdd vi<tims, includina
investigahve teads lltat inditare a iiketilmod of unousness of offense or dangerousness to the comsnuniTy; 8) develop psocedwes for handhn�
seized evidev<e; 9) maintain report5 requ'vrd by O13DP and other reErorts aod records az detetmined byWe Anomey Generel; ard 10) seek to
comply with nanoual umdazds regarding the mvestigaRon and proucuuoa of luremet crimes agains� cLildrea es set for[U Dy the Attomey
General, W t6e exrent suck standards are consistent wRh the law of ihe Srace where the task force is located.
NCAfCF
I
09-1374
� ��.b.
- Department of Jus6ce
Office of Justice Programs
�i O�ce ofthe Chief Financial Officer
. s--.� .
�>
Washington, D.G 20531
September 16, 2009
Chief John Hazriagton
CiTy of Saint Paul
IS W. Keilogg Blvd.
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Reference Grant Number. 2009-MGCX-K039
Deaz Chief Hardng[on:
I am pleased to inform you that my office has approved [he following 6udget categones for the aforementioned grant award in
[he cost categones ideNified below:
Category Budget
Personnei
Fringe Benefits
Travei
Equipment
Supplies
Conshuction
ContracNal
Other
ToCal Direct Cost
Indirec[ Cost
Total Project Cost
Federal Funds Approved:
No�-Federal Share:
$0
$0
$13,000
$ (46,030
$0
$0
$SQ764
$146,632
$}55,826
$0
$355,826
$3i5,82b
$0
Proglam Income: $0
Ma[ch is not required for ihis grant program.
09-1374
3f you have quesTions regattling 16i5 award p��se contact:
- Progrnm Questions, Wtill D. Bronson, Program Manager ac (2Q2) 3�5-2427
- Financial Ques[ipns, the Office of Chief Financial O�cec Customer Service Center(CSC)
at (800) 458-0786, or you may con[act thc CSC at ask.ocfo@usdoj.gov.
Congratuiafions, and we look forward to working with you.
Sincerely,
/ 'a�nu, x �
Marcia K. Paull
Chief Financiat O�cer
04-1374
DepartmentofJustice
� Office of lustice Programs
� �°""� ��� Office for Civi1 Rights
Washiagron, D C 2053!
September 16, 2009
Chieflohn Harrington
City of Saint Paul
) 5 W. Kellogg Blvd.
Saint Paul, MN 551o2
Dear Chief Harrington:
CongraNlaUons on your recent award. in establishing financial assistance programs, Congress linked the reCeipt of Federal funding to
compliance with Federal civil rights laws. The Office for Civil Rights (OCR), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), U.S. Aeparlment of 7ushCe
is responsible for ensuring that recipienis of financial aid from OJP, its component offices and bureaos, the Office on Violence A�aiost
Women (OVFVj, and the Oftice of Community Oriented Po�icing Services (COPS) comply with applicable Federal civii nghts staNtes and
regulafions. We at OCR are availabie to help you and your organisation meet the civil rights requirements that come w�th lustice
Deparhnentfunding.
E�suring Access to Federally Assisted Programs
As you k�ow, Federal laws prohibit recipients of financial assistance from disariminating on the basis of cace, coloi, nacional origin,
religion, sex, or disability in funded progrnms or activities, not only in respect to employment practices bu[ also in the delivery of services or
benefits. Federal law also prohibits funded programs ot activrties 6om discnminating on the basis of age in the delivery of services or
benefits.
Providing 5ervices Co Limi[ed English Proficiency (LEP) Individua3s
In accordance with Department of Justice Guidance pertaining to 1'itle VI of the Civil Righta ACt oE 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d, recipients of
Federal financial assistance must take reasonable steps to provide meaningful acczss ro theirprograms and ac[ivities for persons w�th limited
English proficiency (LEP). For moce infocma6on on the civil rights responsibili6es that recipients have in providing language services to
LEP mdividuals, piease see the websiCe at http:!{www.lep.gov.
Eqsuring Equal Treatment for Faith-Based Organizations
The Ilepartment of 3ustice has published a regulation specifically pectaining to the funding of faith-based organizationa Ia general, the
reguladon, Participation in SustiCe Department Programs by Religious Organizations; Providin$ for Equal Treatment of ail Justice
Department Program Part+cipants, and known as the Equa! Treatment Regulation 28 C.F.R. part 38, requires State Administering Agencies
to treat these organizapons tNe same as any other appiicant or recipient. The reguVation prohibifs State Administering Agencies from making
award or gmiit administration decisions on the basis of an organiza[ion's religious character or affiha8oq religious name, or [he religious
composinon of iu board of directors.
The regulatioa atso prohihits faith-baSed organizatiorts from using financial assistance from the Departmen[ of Iustice [o fund inherently
retigious activities. While faith-based organizations can engage in non-funded inherently religious aetivities, they must be heid sepazately
from the Department of 7ustice funded program, and customers or beneficiaries cannot be compelled to participate m them. The Equal
Treatrnent Regulation also makes clear ttiat organizafions participating in programs Eunded by the Department of Sustice aze not persniued to
discrimmate in the provision of services on the basis of a beneficiary's rcli�ion. For more informahon on the regulation, please see OCR's
website ac http:(fwww.ojp.usdo}.gwlocr(effbo.htm.
State Administering Ageocies and faith-based organizations should also note that the Safe Stree[s Act, as amended; the Vichms of Gime
Aet, as amended; and the Juvenile Justice and Delinquemy Prevention Act, as amended, contain prohibitions against discrimination on [he
basis of religion m employment. Desplte these nondiscrimiiiation provisions, the Justice Department has concluded that the Religious
Freedom Restoradon Act (RFItA) is ceasonably conshued, on a case-6y-case basis, to requice that Rs fu�ding agencies petmit faith-based
organizations applymg for funding under the applicable program statutes both to receive DOJ funds and to continue considedng religion
when hiring staff, even if the stamte that au[horizes t6e funding program generally forbids considering of religion m employment decisions
by grantees.
Questions about the regulation oc the app(ication of RFRA to the staNtas that peohibit disCrimination iu emptnyment may be directed to [his
Office.
09-1374
Enforcing Civil Rights Laws
All recipien45 of Federal financiai assistance, regardless of the particular funding souree, the amount of the grnnt award, or the number of
employees in the workforce, are subject to fhe prohibitions against unlawful discrimination. Accordingly, OCR investigatc recipients that
are the subject of discrimination complaints from both individua75 and a oups. ln addition, based on regutatory criteria, OCR seiects a
number of recipients each year for compiiance reviews, audits fha[ require recipienfs [o submit data showing that they aze providing services
equitably [o all segmenu of [heirservice population and that their employment practices meet equal employment oppoRUnity standards.
Complying with the Sate Streets Act or Program Requirements
Sn addi[ion [o these general prohibitions, an organization which is a recipient of financial assistance subject [o the noodscrimination
provisions of the Omnibus Crime Conhol and Safe S[reets Act (Safe Streets Ac[) of 1968, 42 U.S.C. ¢ 3789d(c), or other Federal grant
progtam requirements, must meet two additional requirements:(i) complying with Federal regulations pertaining to the development of an
Equal Employment Opportunity Plan (EEOP), 28 C.F.R. § 42301-308, and (2) submitting to OCR Findings of Discrimination (see 28
C.F.R §§ 42.205(5) or 31.202(5)).
1) Mee6ng the EEOP Requirement
In accordance wi[h Federal regula[ions, Assurance No. 6 in Ihe Standard Assurances, COPS Assuxance No. B.B, or certain Fedenl grant
program requirements, your organization must comply with [he following EEOP reporting requvements:
If your organization has received an award for $500,000 or more and has 50 or more employees (counting both full- and part-time
employees but excluding political appoin[ees), [hen i[ has to prepare an EEOP and submit i[ [o OCR for review within 60 days from the
date ot this letter. For assistance in developing an EEOP, please consult OCR's websce at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ocdeeop.htm You
may also request technical usistance from an EEOP specialist at OCR by dialin� (202J 616-3208.
If your ocganixation received an award between $25,040 and $500,000 and has 50 or more emptoyees, your organization still has to prepue
an EEOP, but R does not have to submit the EEOP to OCR for review. [nstead, your organization has [o maintain t6e EEOP on file and
make it available for review on request. In addition, yout organiza6on has to complete Sec[ion B of the Certification Fonn and retum it to
OCR. The Certification Fomt can be found at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov(ocdeeop.htm.
If your organizacion received an award for Iess than $25,000; or if your organizacion has less than 50 employees, regardless of the amount of
the awatd; or iFyour organi�ation is a medical insciWtion, educa6onal institution, nonprofit organiza[ion or [ndian tribe, Ihen your
organization is exempt from tlie EEOP requiremen4 Howeve�, you� ocganization must complete Section A of the Certification Fo[m and
retum it to OCR. The Certification Form can be found aI http:!(www.ojp.usdo}.gov(ocrfeeop.htm.
2) Submitting Findings of Discrimi»ation
in tlie event a Federal or State court or Federal or State administra[ive agency makes an adve�se hnding of discrimination against your
organization afier a due process hearing, on the ground of race, color, religion, natlonal origin, or sex, your organization musf submit a copy
of the findmg to OCR for review
Ensuring the Compliance oP Subrecipients
if your organization makes subawards to other agencies, you are responsib{e for assuring that subrecipients also comply wii6 all of the
applicabie Federai civil rights laws, including the requirements peAaining to developing and submitting an EEOP, reporting Findings of
Discrimina4on, and providing language services to LEP persons. 5tate agencies t}iat make subawards must have in place standard grant
assurances and review procedures [o demonstra[e that they are effectively monitoring the civil rights compliance oPsubrecipients.
If we can assist you in any way in fulfiiling your civi7 rights responsibilities as a recipient of Federal funding, please Call OCR at (202) 307-
0690 or visit our website at h[lp://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ocr/.
Sincerely,
�--/ a. �---
Michael L. Alston
D�zectoz
cc: GraotManager
Financial Analyst
09-1374
�,� ->:a
r Department of 3usfice
�, � Office of 7ustice Programs
� _ ��
Office of the Assistant Attomey General ivosh;ngma DC 2n331
September 16, 2009
Chief 7ohn Aamngcon
Ciry of Saint Paal
I S W. Kellogg Blvd.
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Dear Chie£ Harrington:
On behalf of Attomey General Eric Holder, it is my pleasure to inform you that the OPfice oP Justice Progrnms has approved
your application for fundmg under the FY 09 intemet Crimes Against Children 1'ask Force Program Contmuation
in the amount of $355,826 for City of Saint Paul.
Enclosed you wilt find the Grnnt Award and Special Canditions documents. This award is subject to aIl administrative and
finawial reqwrements, including the timely submission of aU financial and programmatic reports, resolution of all intenm
audie findin�s, and the maintenance of a minimum Ievel of cash-on-hand. Should you not adhere to these reqarements, you
will be in violation of the certns of chis agreement and the award will be subject to tecmination for cause or other adminishative
action as appropriate.
If you have questions regarding this award, please coniact:
Rogram Quesiions, W ill D. Bronson, Program Manager at (202) 305-2427; and
Financial Questions, the O(fice of the ChieEAinaneial Officey Customer Service Center (CSC) at
(800) 458-07$6, or you may contact the CSC at ask.ocfo@usdoj.gov.
Congratulations, a�d we look forward to work9ng with you.
Sincerely,
''l�`�+.�,.�. t.w., S...ka.,�,,t
ti �
1
Mary Lou Leary
Acting Assista�t Attomey General
Enclosures
09-1374
St. Paul Potice Department Program Narrative
Table of Contents
1.0 PROJECT ABSTRACT' ....................................................................................................3
2.0 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEMfPROGRAM NARRATIVE .............................4
2.1 Nature and Scope of the Problem ...................................................................................4
2.2 Effects of the Problem on the Target Population and Target Community ...............4
2.3 PreviousJCurrent Attempts to Address the Problem .................................................5
2.3.1 Creation of MICAC Task Force ...........................................................................5
2.3.2 Collaboration with Forensic Affiliates ...............................................................6
2.3.3 Recent MICAC Investigations .............................................................................6
2.4 Applicable Research and Evaluation Studies ...............................................................8
3A IMPACT/OUTCOMES AND EVALUATION/ PERFORMANCE MEASURE
DATA COLLEC'ITON PLAN .........................................................................................9
3.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................9
3 .2 Goals ...................................................................................................................................9
3.3 Objecrives .........................................................................................................................10
3.3.1 Forensic Examiner Position ...............................................................................10
3.3.2 Forensic Hubs......_ ..............................................................................................11
3.3.3 Equipment and Training ....................................................................................12
3.3.4 Statewide Internet Safety Campaign ................................................................ i 4
3.4 Performance Measures ...................................................................................................14
4.0 PROGRAMjPROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION ..........................16
4.1 Correlation of Strategies and Goals ..............................................................................17
4.2 Use of Local ResourcesJGrant Sustainability .............................................................17
4.3 Adherence to PROTECT Act .........................................................................................18
4.3.1 Provision of Forensic, Preventive, and Investigative Assistance .................19
4.3.2 Partnerships with Other Agencies and Jurisdictions .....................................20
4.3.3 Participation in Investigations/Adherence to Established Standards........21
4.3.4 Invesfigation of Tips ...........................................................................................21
4.3.5 Procedures, Processes, and Reporting .............................................................21
4.4 Logic Mode1 .....................................................................................................................22
OJJDP FY 69 internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 'I of 24
CFDA # 16.543: Missi� ChildreNs Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Departmeni Program N a r r a ti v e
4 .5 Timeline ........................................................................................................................... �2
S.Q CAPABILITIES/COMPETENCIES .............................................................................22
5.1.1 Organizational Structure ....................................................................................23
5 .1.2 Personnel ..............................................................................................................23
5 .1.3 Contractors ...........................................................................................................23
5.1.4 Previous Experience ...........................................................................................24
5.1.5 Memoranda of Understanding .........................................................................24
OJJOP FY 04 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 2 of 24
CFDA q 76.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department Program Narrative
1.0 PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Saint Paul Podice Departrnent (SPPD) is the grantee for the Minnesota Crimes
Against Chiidren (MICAC) Task Force. In partnership with the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension (BCA}, the SPPD proposes to use these grant monies for two purposes:
• Enhancing existing efforts in the identification, apprehension, and prosecution of child sexual
predators, and
• Providing Intemet safety education and awareness.
The two papulations served are children (identi&ed and unidentified) who are victims of
Intemet exploitation and parents, cazetakers, and other professionals who interact with children.
Proposed grant activities include the following;
• Introducing a statewide Internet safety campaign,
� Creating regional computer forensic and cell phone analysis hubs,
■ Funding one half-time (.5 FTE) forensic examiner position,
• Funding Internet investigative training,
� Funding computer forensic and cell phone analysis training, and
• Updating hardware and software to enhance investigative efforts.
Our short-term goals are to introduce a statewide Internet safety campaign and identify
regional computer forensic and cell phone analysis hubs. Our intermediate goal is more timely
investigations that result in prosecurion. Progress will be measured through accountability data
reported monthly to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP).
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Cnmes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 3 of 24
CFDA N 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department Pr Narr
2.0 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEMlPROGRAM NARRATIVE
2.1 NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE PitOSLEM
The State of Minnesota has recognized the need for additional resources to help protect
our children from sexual predators. We cunently have 14,460 registered sex offenders in
Minnesota. Since 1991, there have been a total of 19,099 identified child vicrims of sexual
violence.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that children are increasingly exposing themselves to the
risks of exploitatiot� through their own dangerous behauior by engaging in self-manufacturing of
pornography (i.e., sexting). Public education into the risks of Cyber exploitation seems to be
inadequate compared to the number of children using the Intemet and exposed to these dangers.
The nutnber of children who can be rescued from online sexual predators—and the number of
child sexual predators who can be incarcerated—is limited only by the availability of
investigative resources and the MICAC Task Force's subsequent ability to analyze recovered
digital evidence.
2.2 EFFECTS OF TNE PROBLEM ON THE TARGET POPULATION AND TARGET
COMMUNITY
A growing body of research documents the prevalence of Intemet crimes against children
(for example, see reports such as the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children's
(NCMEC's) 2006 Online V?ctimizatioK of Youth: Five Years Later). However, research on the
effects of such crimes on children and others (e.g, Internet users, pazents of victims, and law
enforcement personnel who investigate these crimes) is less available. Anecdotal evidence of
negative effects includes, but is not limited to, v3ctim suicide, disintegration of the victim's
OJJDP FY 09 lnternet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 4 of 24
CFDA 11 16.543: Missing Chtifdren's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police DepaRment Program Narrati
family structure, community ostracization of the victim and hislher family, and an increasing
demand for mental health counseling services. Some resources—such as the Dr. Sharon Cooper
videos on the www.netsmartz.org website—reflect effects to collect anecdotal data on topics
such as online hazassment and the negative impact of sexual images on children.
2.3 PREVIOUS/CURRENT ATTEMPTS TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM
2.3.1 Creation of MICAC Task Force
The SPPD was first awarded a U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) ICAC grant in June
2000. With that iniCial grant, the SPPD created the statewide MICAC Task Farce. The SPPD
uses DOJ grant funds to pay the salaries of the MICAC Commander and a forensic examiner,
and also to provide computer hardwarelsoftwareltraining support to affiliate agencies.
In 2006, the Minnesota Legislature and Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty established
an ICAC unit within tbe BCA. This unit has dedicated nine FTEs to the ICAC effott in
Minnesota. In 2007, a formal partnership between the MICAC Task Force and the BCA's ICAC
unit was established; both entities are currently housed at the BCA's St. Paul headquarters. The
BCA is fully commitYSd to meeting all 1CAC responsibilities listed in the PROTECT Act. All
funding decisions regarding the MICAC Task Force aze reviewed with the BCA to ensure
maximum statewide impact. The BCA has become tHe primary MICAC statewide investigative
and forensic resowce for the State of Minnesota.
The MICAC Task Force includes 53 affiliate law enforcement agencies throughout the
5tate of Minnesota, as well as the FBI Cyber Crimes Task Force. Every MICAC affiliate agency
has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the SPPD. Every affiliate has made a
OJJDP FY 09 Intemet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Contlnuation Page 5 of 24
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department
Program Narrative
formal commitmene to investigate technotogy-related child sexual exploitation cases and has
allocated part-time investigative resources to these investigations.
2.3.2 Collaboration with Forensic A�liates
Twenty-one (21) ofMICAC's 53 affiliates are forensic affiliates (FAs) that provide
forensic evidence analysis not only for their own jurisdictions, but also for ICAGrelated cases
outside their jurisdictions. They receive training and equipment from MICAC, which allows
them to conduct most of their own investigations. Our partnerships with FAs are an essential
component to MICAC's success.
2.3.3 Recent MICAC investigations
In 2008, MICAC investigated nearly 500 Intemet child sexual esploitation cases. These
cases included ttie possession, distribution, and manufacturing of child pornography, as well as
the solicitation of children via electronic communicatiott. ApprQximately 250 investigations were
in response to Cybertips, which are investigative leads regarding Internet crimes that ar� sent to
the task farce by NCMEC. The other nearly 250 cases included a�liate casework and proactive
efforts in the areas of undercover chat investigations and Peer Precision (i.e., peer-to-peer)
mvest�gattons.
Undercover chat and Peer Precision investigative efforts have a proven record of
identifying child sexual predators, rescuing unknown vietims, and gaining quality prosecutions
and convictions. Of the entire MICAC caseload, 50 such investigations have resulted in the anest
andlor prosecution of a child predator.
OJJDP FY 09 intemet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page b of 24
CFOA q 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department P rogram Narcative
Undercover Chat lnvestigatio»s
Undercover chat investigations are conducted by trained, sworn law enforcement officers
who pose as children in Internet chat rooms. In those cases, child sexual predators contact the
child, who is actualiy an undercover officer, and solicit either sex or trave( to meet the child for
sex. For example, we conducted one undercover chat operation over a three-week period in
2007. As a result of that operation, 18 chiid sexual predators were identified in Minnesota.
Peer Precision lnvestigations
Peer Precision is a DOJ/national ICAC investigative tool that allows investigators to
identify suspects within their jurisdictions who are offering to distribute child pornography via
the Internet's peer-to-peer file-share programs. For example, the Wyoming ICAC Task Force's
Operation Faisplay used this tool in February 2009 to idenrify nearly 4,500 independent IP
addresses in Minnesota that have shared chiid pornography via file-sharing networks.
A recent MICAC investigarion using the Peer Precision tool led to the identificaTion of
three unknown child victims. In a similaz case, we recovered thousands of child poznography
images and videos from one suspecY s computer and identified four unknown victims that the
suspect had molested while producing child pornography. The suspect, Aaron Lemon, was
prosecuted by the US Attorney's Office as part of MICAC's and that office's commitment to
Praject Safe Childhood (PSC). The investigator, Bill Haider, was awarded the 2009 National
Missing and fixploited Children's Award for his efforts in uncovering forensic evidence and
building this case. Haider was recognized at a Congressional Breakfast in Washington, DC on
May 12, 2009.
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Chitdren Task Force Program Continuation Page 7 of 24
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department Program Narrative
2.4 APPLICABLE RESEARCH AND EVALUATION STUDIES
As summarized in the following examples, the Intemet's ever-expanding role in
contributing to the sexual exploitation of children has been well documented.
• In 2007, an undercover chat investigaflon conducted in Minnesota identified one suspect for
every ten hours an investigator posed as a child in local chat raoms.
� A 2005 NCMEC study demonstrated that, among all children using the Internet, I in 7 were
victims of a sexual solicitation, and 1 in 25 were victims of an aggressive sexual solicitation.
• A 2004 study by Andres E. Hernandez, PsyD, Director, Sex Offender Treatment Program,
Federal Bureau of Prisons, determined that 7b percent of offenders convicted of the crime of
Possession of Child Pornography had committed undisclosed physical contact sexual crimes.
This statistic suggests that approximately 75 percent of the 4,500 suspects identified in
February 2009 (see the Peer Precision Investigations narrative in the previous section) couid
have akeady committed a sex crime.
Tn addition to reviewing published studies, MICAC identifies and reviews unpublished
locai information on Intemet crimes against children as that information becomes available. For
example, we routinely receive data from the 3acob Wetterling Resource Center in Saint Paul,
MN—such as a March 2009 "Sexting Prevention" tip sheet that included data on the number of
teenagers who sendlreceive sexually suggestive photos via their cell phones.
Information from both published and unpublished sources helps demonstrate the
increasing prevalence of Internet crimes against children and MICAC's need for additionai
funding to investigate these crimes.
OJJDP FY 091ntemet Cnmes Against Childreo Task Force Program Continuation Page 8 of 24
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Lhildren's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department Prog Narr
3.0 IMPACT/OUTCOMES AND EVALUATIONi
PERFORMANCE MEASURE DATA COLLECTION PLAN
This projecYs goals and objectives aze intended to help MICAC and its FAs improve
effectiveness in responding to online enticement of children by sexual predators and child
exploitation, child obscenity, and pomography. This projecYs goa]s also include increased public
awarenessleducadon regarding Intemet and technology safety issues. For each goal, MICAC
witl conduct ongoing quality assurance, data collection, and internal performance monitoring.
3.1 OVERVIEW
The sophistication of cyber-suspects—as well as the sheer mass of digital evidence that
must be analyzed—has created an investigative bottleneck that routinely hampers aggressive
prosecution efforts. To conduct effective investigations, we require (1) sufficient personnel and
(2) advanced training and tools to identify, track, and analyze the technology used by cyber-
suspects (e.g., oeil phones, personal digital assistants [PDAs), gaming devices, and unique
storage devices).
In addition to inherent investioative challenges, we must also address.children's own
dangerous behavior regarding their use of technology and the consequence of that behavior:
exploitation. To help heighten the awareness of children and adults regarding the potential
dangers of such behavior, we require fiznding to implement a statewide public information
campaign on Internet safety.
3.2 Goa�s
MICAC has identified the following goals far this project:
OlJDP FY 09 lnternet Crimes Against Children 7a5k Force Program Continuation Page 9 of 24
CFDA # 76.543; Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paui Police Department Program Narrative
L Maintain curtent forensic efforts through the funding of one .� FTE forensic examiner
position,
2. Increase forensic efforts by the creation of 10 forensic hubs throughout the State of
Minnesota,
3. Obtain state-of-the-art technology (e.g., computers and cell phone hardware and
software) and provide related training, and
4. Conduct a statewide public information campaign on Intemet safety.
3.3 OBJECTNES
Oiu explana6on of how we will accomplish the above-stated goais is pzesented in the
following subsections:
• 5ection 33.1. Forensic Examiner Position
• Section 3.3.2, Forensic Hubs
• Section 333, Equipment and Training
• Section 33.4, Statewide Intemet Safety Campaign
3.3.1 Forensic Examiner Position
MICAC currently uses ICAC grant funds to pay the one FTB forensic examiner's salary.
This examiner is employed by the BCA, and 100 percent of the forensic �aminer's time is
dedicated to MICAC examinations.
In 2009, the BCA obtained a COPS grant fhat funds 50 percent of this position's salary.
Consequently, we are requesting that 50 percent of this position (i.e., .5 PTE) be funded through
OdJOP FY Q9 Intemet Crimes Against Children Task Force P�ogram ContinuaCion Page 70 of 24
CFDA $ 16.543: Missi� Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Pauf Potice Department Program N
this iCAC grant. This position is essential to maintaining the MICAC's day-to-day forensic
responsibilities.
3.3.2 Forensic Hubs
MICAC is requesting grant funding to create 10 forensic hubs throughout the State of
Minnesota. Currently, MICAC forensic needs aze met through a two-pronged approach that
includes Storage Array Network Architecture (SANA) and Forensic Affiliates (FAs), Each is
discussed below.
Storage Array Network Archifecture
The first prong is the BCA's Storage Array Network Architecture (SANA), in which
suspecYs hard drives are imaged onto the BCA's server. Investigators travel to the BCA, view
the contents of the hard drives, avd bookmark the evidence they want packaged for prosecution.
A forensic examiner does both the imaging of the suspect's hard drive and the subsequent
packaging of the evidence the investigator has discovered. Long-range vision of this concept
includes each investigator's abilaty to view evidence stored at tbe server at BCA headquarters
from remote locations around the state.
Forensic Affiliates
The second prong is the support of the 21 FAs throughout the state. The FAs not only do
forensics for their own jur'rsdictions, but they also often do the forensic analysis for other
MICAC cases. In early 2009, the BCA developed the following concept of forensic hubs:
• We would create 10 forensic hubs throughout the state, with each hub housed in a MICAC
affiliate law enforcement agency.
O1JD7 FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Chitdren Task Force Grogram Contmuation Page 11 of 24
CFDA # '16.543: Missing Children's Assistante
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department Program Na
■ Each hub would be provided with a forensic machine and cell phone analysis equipment and
software to support forensic analysis.
• Investigators in sunounding MICAC affiliate agencies would be trained to use the tools at
the nearest forensic hub.
• Collectively, the 10 forensic hubs would support the forensic needs for many agencies
besides the 10 host agencies.
• The BCA would use the forensic hubs as the remote viewing tocations for the SANA. The
BCA would also facilitate the storage of all digital evidence imaged at the forensic hubs on
its BCA server in St. Paul, thereby relieving investigators throughout the state of the need to
retain and secure the diaital evidence.
3.3.3 Equipment and 7raining
Internet crime investigation requires proactive and reacrive e£forts when using technology
to identify victims and pezpetrators. MICAC's objective in this area is to provide equipment and
training related to the identification and investigation efforts of Internet crimes.
Equipmenf
The purchase of inemory for the SANA system is essential to maintaining curtent levels
of foreneic analysis. Fourteen (14) terabykes of digital storage is needed to store all forensic
evidence and cases on our Storage Area Network (SAN). Every time that a fozensic image or
copy of a suspecYs hard drive or any other electronic evidence is made, it is stored on the SAN.
The entire case is processed using the SAN. Our current forens'sc backlog has our SAN at near
capacity.
OJJDP FY 09 IMemet Gimes Against Children Task Force Program Contmuation Page 12 of 24
CFDA # 76.543: Missing Childreds Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department Program Nattative
To create and support our 10 forensic hubs, we aze also requesting funds to purchase the
following equipment:
• 10 computer forensic workstations,
• 10 ceil phone analysis tools (e.g. Cellibrite, Parabin)
• Computer peripherals (e.g., write-blockers, hard drives, and servers), and
• Software and Iicensing for those 10 workstations (e.g., Accessdata's Forensic Tool Kit,
Webcase Oniine Investigations, Encase, and Camtasia Suite).
Training
Training in the use of hardware technology and forensic software tools is needed to
maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of ttie forensic hub model. The top priority will be to
ensure that a11 FA examiners achieve a minimum level of proficiency. Advanced training or
unique training will be determined by the MICAC Commander based on each examiner's ability
to meet a regional or unique MICAC need.
Computer forensic training is constantly evolving as new software tools are created, and
the training sessions needed over the next year may not have been created yet. MICAC will
determine training needs on a statewide basis. The locations and frequencies of training sessions
will be scheduled after the forensic hubs have been set up. We will ensure that all affiliate
investigators using the hardwarelsoftware wall receive comprehensive training in a timely
manner.
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Porce Program Continuation Page 13 of 24
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Chifdren's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department
Program Narrative
Requested training provided under this grant also includes the M1CAC Commander's
attendance at mandatory quarterly DOJ ICAC Commanders' Meetings, Fox Val3ey ICAC
Prosecutors Training, and out-of-town for forensic training and the ICAC National Conference.
3.3.4 Statewide internet Safety Campaign
Recent studies suggest that many children exploited via the Intemet aze putting
themselves in hann's way due to their cavalier or dangerous behavior while using the Internet.
The BCA's public outreach efforts to date have exposed a glaring lack of knowledge andlor
understanding by parents as to the risks their children face in the cyber worid.
In 2009, the BCA proposed a statewide Internet safety campaign that the BCA would
coordinate through the Office of the Govemor for the State of Minnesota. MICAC is requesting
fundiug for public service announcements, billboard campaigns, handouts, and parent and
teacher education forums to support this campaign. This campaign will include both coiporate
and nonprofit partners.
3.4 PERFORMANCE MEASURES
If awarded funding, MICAC acknowledges our obligation to meet mandatory OJJDP and
TCAC program requirements, including submission of reports to OJJDP within 45 days after the
end of each reporting quarter, as well as the semi-annual program report.
The six ICAC performance measures and their respective data collection methods are as
follows:
• PercenY increase in arrests related to technology-facilitated child sexnal exploitation
and Internet crimes against children — FAs submit reports to the MTCAC Commander
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Confinuaiion Page 14 of 24
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department
Program Narrative
and BCA Supervising Agent in Charge, (SAIC) on investigative, anest, and prosecution
totals related to ICAC crimes. This information is quantified and reported to OJJDP monthly.
• Percent increase in staff dedicated to investigating and prosecuting internet crimes
against children — Reports submitted to OJJDP wi11 include reports from FAs and
compilation of statewide data in the following azeas:
- Number of investigators dedicated to investigating Intemet crimes against children
- Number of prosecutors dedicated to prosecuting Internet crimes against children
- Number of education and forensic specialists dedicated to Intemet crimes against
children
- Number of invesrigafions inifiaCed related to Internet crimes against children
- Number of prosecutions for Intemet crimes against children — The BCA, in
partnership with MICAC, has defined a goal of 80 prosecutions related to ICAC
crimes for FY2009. Each agency, reporting monthiy to tha MICAC Commander and
BCA 5AIC, wiil conrinue to identify ICAC cases that are submitted for prosecution.
This information is quantified and reported to OJJDP on a quarterly basis.
• Percent increase in computer forensic examinations compieted by ICAC task forces —
Each FA, reporting monthly to the MICAC Commander and BCA SAIC, will identify the
number of hazd drives and digital storage devices that aze analyzed. This information is
quantified and reported to OJJDP on a monthly basis.
■ Percent increase in investigaflve technical assistance sessions provided by ICAC task
forces to non-member law enforcement agencies — MICAC wil] continue its outreach
relationship with non-affiliate Iaw enforaement agencles in Minnesota by offering
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Lhildren Task Force Program Continuation Page 15 of 2d
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Potice Department Progrem Narrative
investigative support, technical support, and training. These efforts will be included 3n the
total report numbers provided to OJ.1DP each month.
• Number of law enforcement agencies participating in the ICAC program operational
and investigative standards established by the task force —MICAC will continue its
efforts to add an affiliate ageacy every month, with the emphasis on tribal communities and
probation and pazole agencies. These data aze reported monthiy to OJJDP.
4.0 PROGRAMlPROGRAM DESIGW AND IMPLEMENTATION
ICAC investigations continue to be on the cutting edge of police work. As technology
evolves and the sophistication of crime increases, ICAC teams are chailenged to design models
of service delivery graunded in evidence-based practice. This granYs project design embraces
the ueed for greater public awareness related to Internet safety issues, as well as increased
emphasis on the investigative model of dissemination, collection, evaluation, collation, analysis,
and prosecution. We wili focus on the following activities:
� Conducting a statewide Internet safety campaign,
• Disseminating technology support systems (i.e, hardware/software) to FAs as part of the
development of a statewide networking system to share evidence and expand invesrigarive
capabilities by designated affiliates and non-affiliates,
• Collecting data regarding investigative efforts, with monthly reports submitted to the MICAC
Commander and, in tiun, to OJJPD,
• Analyzing investigative effofts using accountability data related to the identificarion of
perpetrators and victims and subsequent prosecution of ICAC crimes, and
OJJDP FY 09 Intemet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 16 of 24
CFDA # 16.543: Missitw Children's Assistance
09-1314
St. Paul Police Department Program Na
• Preparing monthly and quarterly analyses/reports that allow for adjustment and redirection of
investigative efforts as needed.
4.1 CORREIATfON OF STRATEGIES AND GOALS
Our proposed strategies are directly correlated to the five goals identified in Section 3.1:
1. Continue to fund the .5 FTE forensic examiner position,
2. Increase forensic efforts through the creation of 10 forensic hubs,
3. Obtain state-of-the-art technology (e.g., computer hardware and software) and provide
related training, and
4, Conduct a statewide Internet safety campaign.
All four goals support the ICAC goals identified in the PROTECT Act. The public
campaign meets onr primary focus of prevention, while the other three objectives address the
ongoing need to develop new processes and procedures to better manage investigations related to
ICAC crime. The creation of ten forensic hubs, the acquisition of appropriate hardware/software,
and training on new technologies will maximize the use of the [echnological tools and the FA's
related invesYigative skills.
4.2 l3SE OF LOCAL RESOURCES/GRANT SUSTAIPIABILITY
MICAC, in collaboration with tbe BCA, cunently operates under the following grants:
• ICAC Grant (through 12(31(04) — This is a renewed grant that provides for one FTE
cornmander's salary, one FTE forensic examiner's s salary, training, training-selated travel,
and computer hardware/software/peripherals for FAs.
0.]JDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Chitdren Task Force Program ContSnuation Page 17 of 24
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Chifdren's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department Progrem Narrefive
■ Building Forensic Capacity Granf (through 12/31109) — In 2007, MICAC was awarded a
Buitding Forensic Capacity supptemental grant to enhance the forensic capabilities of the
task force. This grant has allowed MICAC to create a unique forensic evidence system,
whereby investigators are able to view and identify their own digital evidence. By using this
model to analyze our ever-increasing amount of digital evidence, we maximize our ]imited
forensic examiner resources.
• Community Oriented Policing (COP) Grant (through 9/20/10) —The BCA, in
partnership with MICAC, was awarded a COP grant in 2008. Monies from this grant are used
to identify investigative tools, undercover chat, and peer-to-peer techniques, with the goal of
identifying and arresting an additional 80 child sexual predators over a two-year period.
These three gra�its serve the same areas and target popularions as those proposed in this
grant application. MICAC will apply for new grants and renewals of existing grants, as
appropriate, to enswe continued operations.
In addition to operaring funds received through grants, MICAC activities are supported
by an established collaboration between the SPPD and the BCA. The BCA's contribution to the
MICAC effort is approximately $750,000(yeaz. BCA personnel resources—including clerical
support, office space, equipment and systems (vehicles, computers, etc.)—are funded through an
established formula.
4.3 ADHERENCE TO PROTECT ACT
Section 103 of the PROTECT Act specificaily tazgets increasing the investigative
capabilities of sfate and local law enforeement agencias. In alignment witYi Section 103, this
grant's funding will support the cunent MICAC model. In addition, it wili provide for the
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children 7ask Force Program Continuation Page 18 of 24
CFDA # 76.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department Program Narrative
expansion of investi�ative efforts to improve the timeliness and effectiveness of investigations
(both proactive and reactive).
The SPPD uses OJJDP a ant funding to pay the salary of a full-time MICAC commander,
who in concert with the BCA's statewide network has proven to be an effective method of
ensuring that Minnesota is meeting the goals mandated in the PROTECT Act. This joint model
of MICAC Commander and BCA SAIC has expanded the investigative capacity of the state by
dramatically increasing the number of affiliate agencies from 13 in 2005 to the current 53
agencies that pursue child predators. The partnership has al]owed the task force to refocus its
energies from being almost exclusively a reactive investigative entity to becoming a highly
proactive entity; our cuirent rate of more than 70 percent of MICAC anests and prosecutions
results from proactive investigations. This focus on both reactive and proactive investigations, as
well as the increased number of affiliate law enforcement agencies, has resulted in a 25 percent
increase in statewide prosecutions each of the last three years.
4.3.1 Provision of Forensic, Preventive, and Investigative Assistance
In coilaboration with the BCA, MICAC currently responds to approximately 300 cyber
tips per yeaz. In the past two years, we have trained more than 1,700 law enforcement personnel
and facilitated Internet safety presentations for more than 32,000 children and adults. Training
and outreach continue to be a high priority. The full-time commander position allows for
adequate identification, support, and coordination of these efforts.
Another critical activity undertaken by the MICAC Commander and BCA SAIC is
forging relationships with private partners, county attorneys, and probation and parole officers.
Over the past two yeazs, the commander has met often with the Project Safe Childhood (PSC)
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 79 of 24
CFDA �i 16.543: Missing Childreds Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department
Program Narretive
coordinator, as well as the U.S Attomey for the District of Minnesota, to ensure that all
prosecutions goals are met.
4.3.2 Partnerships with Other Agencies and Jurisdictions
MICAC and the BCA have many established partnerships, including but not limited to
the following:
• A full commitment to the Depaztment of Justice's Project Safe Childhood (PSC) initiative,
� An MOU with the District of Minnesota United States Attomey's Office (USAO), with joint
meetings occurring regulazly to discuss and coordinate federal prosecution efforts of chiid
predators,
• A partnership with the U.S. Marshals Office (USMS) for the District of Minnesota,
• A partnership with Minnesota county attorneys who prosecute child sexual abuse cases,
which includes providing investigative/technical assistance and law enforcemenUprosecution
training throughout the state,
� An MOU with the FBI Cyber Crimes Task Force,
• A partnership with ICE, and
• A partnership with the Jacob Wetterling Resource Center.
In addition, MICAC and the BCA have a close working relationship with probation
officers and correction officials throughout the state. We have trained probation and correction
officers in the techniques of monitoring and detecting probationers' restricted or illegal Internet
use. And, although we do not yet have a formai MOU with tribal communities, we will continue
to contribute resources to tribal efforts to protect children who live in those Minnesota
communities.
OJJDP r'Y 09 Inremet Crimes Against Chitdren Task Force Program Continuation Page 20 of 24
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's AssisWnce
09-1374
St. Paul Poiice Department Program Narcative
Overall, these multi-jurisdictional, multi-agency partnerships provide ongoing
informational, administrative, and technology support. They help MICAC and other local/state
law enforcement agencies acquire the necessary knowledge, personnel, and specialized
equipment to investigate and prosecute Intemet crimes against children.
4.3.3 Participafion in Investigafions/Adherence to Established Standards
MICAC is capabie of pazticipating in nationally coordinated investigations in any case in
which the Attomey General determines such participation to be necessary. Participation will
occur as permitted by MICAC's available resources. As participants, MICAC and the BCA will
apply and promote investigative and prosecution standards that are consistent with established
norms.
4.3.4 Investigation of Tips
The addition of forensic investigators will enhance MICAC's ability to investigate tips
related to Internet crimes against children and to seek prosecution, as appropriate. W e have an
established track recard of investigating tips from sources such as Operation Fairplay, the
National ICAC Data System, NCMEC's CyberTipline, OCAC task forces, and other federal,
state, and local agencies. Our priority is to investigate leads that indicate the possibility of
identifying or rescuing child victims, including leads that indicate a likelihood of a serious
offense or danger to the community
4.3.5 Procedures, Processes, and Reporting
MICAC and the BCA follow mandated "chain of custody" procedures, including but not
limited to maintaining such reports and records as are required by the Attomey General.
Furthermore, we comply with national standards regarding the investigation and prosecution of
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against CMldren Task Force Program Continuation Page 21 of 24
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department
Program Narrative
Internet crimes against children, as set forth by the Attomey General, to the extent such
standazds are consistent with Minnesota law.
MICAC, in cooperation with the BCA, will provide any support necessary to the
evaluation of projects supported through this solicitation and managed by the National Institute
of Justice. Such support includes our availability to provide data and supporting documentation
on request.
4.4 LOGIC MODEL
This application includes a logic model that illustrates how the performance measures are
related to this projecYs problems, goals, objectives, and design. Per application requirements,
this logic model is submitted as a separate document in "MICAC Logic Mode16-09.pdf' file.
4. TIMELINE
A timeline chart that indicates major tasks, assigns responsibility for each, and plots
completion of each task by month or quarter for the duration of the award is included in this
grant application. Per grant appiieation requirements, the timeline is submitted as a separate
document in the "MICAC Timeline 6-09.pdf' file. Upon receipt of award, the timeline may be
revised based on training and technical assistance provided by OJJDP.
5.0 CAPABILITIES/COMPETENCIES
The Minnesota BCA ICAC unit and the St. Paul Police Department MICAC Task Force
are located at the BCA headquarters in St. Paul, Minnesota. The two agencies joined their
respective units in August 2007.
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 22 of 24
CFDA N 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department
5.1.1 Organizational Structure
Program Narrative
The BCA ICAC unit, which is supervised by SAIC Eric Knutson, comprises ten full-time
members; Knutson reports directly to BCA Superintendent Timothy O'Malley. Commander Neil
Nelson, head of the St. Paul Police Department MICAC Task Force, supervises one staff
member and also manages the MICAC Task Force FAs; Nelson reports d'uectly to St. Paul
Police Department Chief John Hamngton.
Knutson and Nelson are engaged in daily dialogue related to overall ICAC investigative
and forensic responsibilities. They have frequent meetings to discuss staff development, training,
a�d future ICAC needs and direction. The chain of command and lines of communication will
continue throughout the course of the grant and beyond.
5.1.2 Personnel
Key personnel far this project include Commander Neil Nelson, 5AIC Eric Knutson. and
the following employee:
■ Forensic examiner — This .5 FTE individual's primary responsibility will be as a forensic
examiner. He or she will assist in training other investigators on how to conduct forensic
examinations and how to conduct on-scene triage.
Resumes and position descriptions for Nelson and Knutson and the forensic examiner are
presented in the "MICAC Resumes and Position Descriptions 6-09.pdP' file submitted as part of
this application.
5.1.3 Contractors
No contractors will be use as part of this project.
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 23 of 24
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Ass�sWnce
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department Program Narrative
5.1.4 Previous Experience
MICAC's experience implementing projects of similar design/magnitude as that
proposed in this application are highlighted in Section 2.3, Previous/Current Attempts to Address
the Problem, and Section 4.3, Adherence to PROTECT Act.
5.1.5 Memoranda of Understanding
The following documents are included with this application:
� The SPPD's Memorandum of Understanding between OJJDP, U.S. Attorney and ICAC Task
Force (effective February l, 2008) (see MICAC MOU 6-09.pdfl, and
• Minnesota Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Multi-Agency Law Enforcement
Joint Powers Agreement between the SPPD and the BCA (effective through December 31,
2009) (see MICAC JPA 6-09.pd fl.
OJJDP FY 09 Intemet Crimes Against Children Task Force Progrem Continua[ion Page 24 of 24
CFDA tf 16.543; Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
Saint Paul Police Department Budget Detail Worksheet
Table of Contents
1.0 BUDGET DETAIL WOItKSHEET
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 1 of 3
LFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paui Police Department
1.0 BUDGET DETAIL WORKSHEET
A. Consultants and Contratts
Posiflon Annual Cost Percentage of Cost in $$
Time Devoted to
Project
ForensicExaminer(.SFTE) $50,164.00 100 $ 50,164.00
TOTAL $ 50,164.00
:P 3 � p � Q} � 3.. l P.: 3. ' 3 �� i �- ; s ] .' .�` .
F.. �� GI�1LLy11�.: 2 � 3 P
oT[. v��. I � ". S:.P +Y`n � -
Item Y ComputaHon Cost in $$
Forensic Workstations 10 @ $4,000 $ 40,000.00
Cell Phone Analysis Tool 10 @$3,500 35,000.00
SANA Digital Storage (14 terabytes) 1@$ 60,000 60,000.00
ToTn[. $ 135,000.00
y s�, "' r ¢ 3�,d � o?�� � �Nr r,��,="x,�, ��.'° '� *M� `�Y,�'�"'a`�,°t��^�t` 5 z��'� ��.: -; � 3 `��' ' � „ ,�,� '�'� ,
�.. ^�. rs.td+a �n . r �. �;c.-: � r a 4� a.. as ��
�x,u" ��.'���,���..4'�`¢" �..a- ��:��,..,.�...�a'i��a'^s�"� �"„'• �,-�..'...4�"�y{ ��- �a� r � 3iec„@ � �i���
._aF :�e.: :,:h, �. _�.,L9v �r.r� .. ..K'�..
Item Computation Cost in $$ �
Write Blocker Set 2@$1,600 $ 3,200.00
1.5-Terabyte Hard Drive 30 @$160 4,800.00
Network Storage Enclosure(Server) 6@$505 3,030.00
Softwaze: Access Data FTK 13 @$2,350 30,550.00
Software Licenses: Access Data (12-month) 5@$684 3,420.00
Sofiware: Webcase Online Investigations 15 @$600 9,000.00
Software: Encase 3 @ $3,000 9,000.00
Software: Camtasia Studio 17 @$200 3,400.00
Training: Access Data FTK Boot Camp Training 30 @ 1,600 48,000.00
Training: Cell Phone Forensics 2@$2,000 4,000.00
Training: Macintosh Forensics 1@$ I,500 1,500.00
Training: Encase 1 @ $2,000 2,000.00
Internet Safety Campaign: Billboard Advertising -- 10,000.00
Internet Safety Campaign: School Training — I5,000.00
Package
Internet Safety Campaign: Parent/Child — 10,762.00
Handouts
ToTa[. $ 157,662.00
OJJDP FY 09 Inteme[ Crimes Against Chitdren Task Force Program Concinuation Page 2 of 3
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department
D. Travel
Purpose of Location, Item Source of Computafion Cost in $$
Travel If Known Travel
Policies
Applied
TBD Airfare Applicant 10 trips @$SOO/trip $ 5,000.00
TBD Lodging Applicarit 10 trips; 5 nights/trip; 5,500.00
Training $110/night x 50 nights
N/A Per diem Applicant 10 trips; 5 days/trip; 2,500.00
$50/day x 50 days
TOTAL $ 13,000.00
; . _. .,. _ ,s. f:a. . .: r . . , _..__..,.�, ... _.
,- _
' s� t�
Budget Category Cost in $$
A. Consultants and Contracts $ 50,164.00
B. Equipment 135,000.00
C. Other Costs 157,662.00
D. Travel 13,000.00
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 355�826.00
FEDERAL REQUEST $ 355,826.00
NON-FEDERALAMOUNT $ .00
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 3 of 3
CFDA # 76.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
Saint Paul Police Department Budget Narretive
Tabie of Contents
1.0 BUDGET NARRATIVE ....................•••••••........•••........
1.1 Forensic Examiner Position .........................................
1.2 Equipment ......................................................................
1.3 Other Costs .....................................................................
1.3.1 Computer Software ...........................................
1.3.2 Peripherals .........................................................
1.3.3 Training ..............................................................
1.3.4 Travel ..................................................................
1.3.5 Statewide Internet Safety Campaign ..............
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
............................................3
............................................3
............................................4
............................................4
............................................5
............................................6
............................................6
Page t of 6
09-1374
St. Paul Police
1.0 BUDGET NARRATIVE
This narrative explains and justifies each budget item presented in the Budget Detail
Worksheet. For each budget item, we also reference the corresponding section of the Program
Narrative.
Overhead costs and indirect costs were not included because they are not applicable. There
will be no subgrant awards.
MICAC acknowledges that the grant period runs from June l, 2009 through May 31, 2011.
We will comply with all PROTECT Act requirements, including but not limited to tracking
and reporting requirements.
'I.'I FORENSIC EXAMINER POSITION
MICAC is requesting the continued grant funding for one .5 FTE forensic examiner
position to meet MICAC's staffing needs. This individuaPs time is 100-percent-dedicated to
MICAC activities. The individuai who fills this position will be a BCA employee, and the BCA
will bill SPPD for their time; for purposes of MICAC administration, this is a contract position.
The salary calculation is presented in the table below. Fringe benefits are included in the
salary totals but are not calculated separately because this is a contract position. The toYal cost for
the one .5 FTE forensic examiner position for the grant period (Fiscal Year 2009-2010) is
$50,164. 00.
Position Total Cost
One .5 FTE Forensic Examiner $ 50,164.00
TOTAL COST FOR POSITION FOR ONE-YEAR GRANT PERIOD $ SO,164.00
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Cnmes Against Children Task Porce Program Continuation Page 2 of 6
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police
For more information on justification for this position, please see Proposal Narrative
Section 33.1, Forensic Examiner Position.
1.2 EQUIPMENT
MICAC is requesting $135,000.00 for equipment. Requested equipment includes the
following items:
10 computer forensic workstations — This equipment will be used in the 10 forensic
hubs created under this grant. The cost for this equipment is $40,000.00.
• 10 cell phone analysis tools — This equipment will be used in the 10 forensic hubs
created under this grant. The cost for this equipment is $35,000.00.
SANA digital storage equipment — This equipment will be used at the MICAC
headquarters in St. Paul. The cost for this equipment is $60,000.00.
Equipment costs are summarized in the table below. For more information on justification
for this equipment, please see Proposal Narrative Section 33.3, Equipment and Training.
ltem Quantity Cost Per Item Total Cost
Forensic Workstations 10 $ 4,000.00 $ 40,000.00
Cell Phone Analysis Tool 10 $ 3,500.00 35,000.00
SANA Digital Storage (14 terabytes) 1 $ 60,000.00 60,000.00
TOTAL EQUIPMENT FOR ONE-YEAR GRANT PERIOD $ 135,000.00
1.3 OTHER COSTS
Other costs include computer software, peripherals, training, uavel, and the statewide
Internet safety campaign. Each is discussed separately below.
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program ConTinuation Page 3 of 6
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Childreds Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police
1.3.1 Computer Software
MICAC is requesting $55,370.00 for software to meet our forensic and investigative needs.
We will use the funds to purchase and renew software licenses that include, but are not limited to
the following: Accessdata, Encase, Webcase Online Investigations, and Camtasia Suite. New
software will support the ten new forensic hubs that will be established and supported under this
grant. Renewed software licenses are needed to maintain the current level of forensic support
provided to MICAC by our FAs.
Software licenses vary greatly in price—from $200 for Camtasia to thousands of dollars
for Accessdata and Encase tools. MICAC requests that these funds be allocated on an as-needed
basis throughout the grant period.
Software costs are summarized in the table below. This budget item is discussed in
Program Narrative Section 333, Equipment and Training.
Item Quantity Cost Per Item Total Cost
AccessData Forensic Tooi Kit 13 $ 2,350.00 $ 30,550.00
AccessData Monthly Maintenance 5 $ 684.00 3,420.00
(12-month licenses)
Webcase Online Investigations 15 $ 600.00 9,000.00
Encase 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00
Camtasia Studio 17 $ 200.00 3,400.00
TOTAL SOFTWARE FOR ONE-YEAR GRANT PERIOD $ 55,370.00
1.3.2 Peripherals
MICAC is requesting $11,030.00 for computer peripherals. Funds will be used to purchase
items that include, but are not limited to, write-blockers, hard drives and servers. These and
similar items are needed to conduct forensic examinations and maintain digital evidence.
MICAC requests that these funds be allocated on an as-needed basis throughout the grant period.
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 4 of 6
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Childreds Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police
The costs of peripherals are summarized in the table below. This budget item is discussed
in Program Narrative Section 3.3.3, Equipment and Training.
Item Quantity Cost Per Item Total Cost
Write Blocker Set 2 $ 1,600.00 $ 3,200.00
1.5 Terabyte Hard Drive 30 $ 160.00 4,800.00
Network Storage Enclosure (Server) 6 $ 505.00 3,030.00
TOTAL PERIPHERALS FOR ONE-YEAR GRANT PERIOD � I I�O3O.00
1.3.3 Training
MICAC is requesting $55,500.00 for training registration. Training sessions are needed for
the following personnel:
• Affiliate MICAC personnel who will be supporting the new forensic hubs established
through this grant and
• FA examiners who need to keep current with new software tools, as well as new and/or
advanced techniques.
Training topics will include, but not be limited to, AccessData and Encase software,
Macintosh computer operations, cell phone training, and personal digital assistant (PDA)
training.
Training costs are summarized in the table below. This budget item is discussed in
Program Narrative Section 333, Equipment and Training.
ltem Qaantity Cost Per Item Total Cost
AccessData FTK Boot Camp Training 30 $ 1,600.00 $ 48,000.00
Cell Phone Forensic Training 2 $ 2,000.00 4,000.00
Macintosh Forensic Training 1 $ 1,500.00 1,500.00
Encase Training 1 $ 2,000.00 2,000.00
TOTAL TRAINING FOR ONE-YEAR GRANT PERIOD $ SS�SOO.00
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Chitdren Task Force Program Continuation Page 5 of 6
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police
1.3.4 Travel
We request grant funding for travel, lodging, and per diem expenses for a total of 10 out-
of-town training sessions for the MICAC commander to attend mandatory quarterly DOJ ICAC
Commanders' Meetings, Fox Valley ICAC Prosecutors Training, and out-of-town for forensic
training and the ICAC National Conference. We have estimated travel expenses at $13,000.00.
Travel costs are summarized in the table below. This budget item is identified in Program
Narrative Section 33.3, Equipment and Training.
1.3.5 Statewide Internet Safety Campaign
MICAC requests grant funding for a statewide Internet Safety Campaign. The BCA will
develop and present this campaign in coordination with MICAC.
As noted in the table below, associated costs are estimated at $ 35,762.00. This budget
item is discussed in Pmgram Narrative Section 333, Equipment and Training.
Item Total Cost
Biilboard Advertising $ 10,000.00
SchoolTraining Packages 15,000.00
ParenUChild Handouts 10,762.00
TOTAL SAFETY CAMPAIGN COSTS FOR ONE—YEAR GRANT PERIOD $ 35�762.00
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 6 of 6
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
�� - 1 r ( �9'R�
_ , _ , _ z � �_
�J�innesota Intemet Crimes Against Children Task Force
Multi-Agency Law Enforcement Joint Powers Agreement
This Y[ulti-A�ency Law Enforcerneni .Toint Puwers .��teement, and amendments and
supplemenfs thereto. ("A�reemenf'} is betz�een the City of Saint Pattl acting throujh its Police
Department {"Cirantee"), empowered to cnfer u�to this Agreement pursuant to Mimi. Stat. �
47159, Subd. 10 � I2, and is further empowered to enter iuto this AgreemenT by Minn. Stat. §
626.76 and State af Mimiesota, actuig through its Comanissioner of Public Safety, Bureau of
Criminal Apprehensiau, located at 1430 �vIacyland Avenue E, St. Patil, Minuesota 55106
("Ltndetsigned Law Enforcement A�ency"), empowered ta enter into this Aarecment pursuan2 to
Minn. Stat. y� 471.59, subd. 10, and i�linn. Stat. y I�.�1 — 15.59,
�Vhereas, the above subscribed parties have jo9ned to�ether in a muiti-agency task force intei3ded
to investigate and prosecute crimes committed agains� children and the crimina3 exploitatioi� of
children tl�at is committed tuzd/or facilitated by or throu�uh the use of computers, and to c�isiupt
and dismantle organizafions enga�ing in sudl activity; aud
iT✓hereas, the lmdersigned agencies agree to utilize applicable state and federal laws to prosecute
criminat, civil, and farfeiture actions against ider�tified r iolaioxs, as appropriate; and
��'hereas, the Urantee is the i�cipieut aFa federal �ra��t (atTached to t11is Agreement as Exl�ibit A}
disbnrsed by the OCfice of Juvanile Justice and Deiinquency Prevention (`"OJ7DP") in
WashingCOn, D.C. to assist law enfarcement in investigating and combaCing the axploibation of
cliilciren which occws tluough t1�e ase ofcomputers Uyproviding funding far eyui�ment,
training, at�d expenses, inciuding travel and overPime fundin�, which are incurred by la�v
c;iforcement as a result of such ia�vestigations; and
y�`hereas, Yhe 07JDP Intemet Crimes Abaiust Cl�ildren (`ICAC") has established a Gi'orking
Group of Directors representing eacl� of the eYisting 1CAC Task Forces to oversee the operatian
of the grant and sub-grant recipients.
Now Therefnrc, the parties agree as follaws:
L The Undersigned I:aw Euforcement Agency approves, authorizes, and enters into titis
Agre�ment wiih the puipose of implertienting a thrce-prouged appro�ch to combat Intemct
Crimcs Against Children: precention, educatio�� and enforcement; and
2. The Undersi�ed La�v Enforcement Agency slta3l adhere to the OJ.TT�P ICAC Task Force
Proaram Sta»dards contained in Exhibit B attacl�ed to this Agreemc�it, in addition to Minttesoia
statc and federa! laws, when conducting undercover operations rela�i� Yo tCAC; and
3. Lxhibits A and S are incorporated into tlus Agreement and n�ade a part thereaf. In the
C'�DOCC�ICN7S ASDSL�'1I:�GS`.CK,IvUTSON\LOCALS}7T(NGS\�E3IPORARY M'CfRtiF"PFILEStOLK?EiiCt'fY pRAPCOF S`I'A'tti
lCAC AG2F'F.Mf;N1' Cti1NG C[Tq GFN ICAC FOKYI Q) UOC
09-1374
event of a conflict Uctween this Agreement and the ExhibiLS, the temis of the Exhibits prevail;
and
4. All officer; contributed by tl�e Undersi� ied La�v Enforcemenr �lgency to the vlinnesota
ICAC Task i�orce shall bc licen,scd peace officets or found by the �/Ii;mesota Board oT Peace
Ofticcr Scandai'ds and Training to hace comparablc qualitications; and
S_ ��1hen a contributed officer of the Undersi�ied La�v Enforcement Agency acts on tiie
hehalf of the Minnesota IC:AC task Force u-ithin the scope of this Agreement, the officer`s
actions are within the o Cficer s iine of duty and course of employmcnt to the same extent as il the
officer had acted or� beilalf of the officer s employing Agency; and
6. The Undersigc�ec3 L.aw Enforcement Agency and Ule Grantee aaree Qiai cacl� party wzll be
respousible for its own acts and thc results thereof to the extent authorized Uy lau� and shall not
Ue responsible for tlie acts of any others and the resiilts thereof. The L;ndersigned Law
Enforceinent Aeency's liabilily 5ha11 be governed by the provisions of tlle Miunesota Tort Claiiszs
Act, Mismesota Statutes, Section 3.736, and othea applicable law. The Grantee's liability sha13 be
govemed by the provisions af the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes, Secrion
�k6b.01- 466.15, aud olher applicable Law; and
7. All membcrs of thc Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency sl�all continue to be emptoye<I
by t�e sau�e Law Enforcevlent Agency employer which they were empinyed befo�e joining tbe
Minnesota ICAC Task Force a��d all sen�ices, duties, acts or omissions performed by the member
wiIl be wiihin the course aud duty of that employment, and thercfore, are covared by the Workers
C,ompeusation prou��ams of flzai employer; will be paid by that em�loyer and etttilled To that
eniployer fringe benefits; anci
3. The Undersig�ied Law Enforcement A�ency shall s�ibn�it a11 requests far undercover
ICAC related operations in wri6ttg to tlle Commandzr of the Minnesota LCt\C Task Force for
present�tiou to the OJ.TDP ICAC Task Foree Board o f Directoxs; and
9. The lindersigned Law En£orcetnent Agency must first submit a �urztien request Cor funds
and receive approval for the funds from the Grautee ta receive any funds from ihe Grantee; and
lfl. The Undersioned Law Enforcemeizt Agency must supply original receipts to be
reimbursed on pre-approved requests; an@ reimbursement will be paid direcilyby thc Grantee to
the Undersi�ucd Law Enforcement Agency within 30 days oP the daYe of invoice, with paym�nY
made out to the'Minnesota Depaztrnent of PuUlic SafeCy and mailed to che Mim�esota Dcpartmcnt
of P¢blic Safety Office of Fiscal & Administrative Services, Attn: Gary 7ohnson, 444 Cedar
SU Suice 126, Town Squarc, St. Paut, Miunesota �5101-5126.
I 1. The O��d�rsi�ed l,aw Enforeenteiat Ageney shatt maintain accuraLe reco3 pertaining to
prevention, edueatiou, and enfareemei�t acti�=ities, to be collccted and fm warded monthty to tlie
G'DOCI'rMG':tTS AND SETTINGS�PKNUTSC)NU�OCALSEt'CJNCSt�EMPORARY 3DTERSET �IGF.S�LKSE1CJlY DRAFT OP STATE
IC�C AGRFI;MLN i� LtS7;�G CPfY GEN 1CAC jORYl (2) DOC
09-1374
Miimesata ICAC Task Force Commander or his desi�nee for statistical reportin� purposes; and
i 2. The Lindersi�ned Iaw Enforcement A�ency shall participate fuliy in any audits required
by the OIJDP; and under Mirui. Stat. § 16C.0�, subd. 5, the Grantee�s and the lindersigned law
Enforcement Agency's books, records docmnents, and accounting procedures and practzces
relevant to this A�reement are subject to examination by the Undersi�ned (aw Enfarcement
Agency andlor the Minnesota State Auciitor or Legislatiae Auditor, as appropriate, for a
minimum oFsix years from the end date of this A�eement; and
13. The Undersigned La�c Enforcement Agency shall make a reasonable good faith artempt ta
be represented at auy sclaeduled c'cgional meetin�s in order to share iizforniatio�i and resources
amongst fl�e n�ultip3e entities; and
14. The Lflidersi�ned Law Enforcement Agency shall be solely responsible for fon��arding
inforniation relative to investigaTive targets to the Child Pomo3raphy Pointer System (CPPS)
pursuant to the O7JDP guideliues; and
] 5. Tl�e Undersiu�ied Law Bnforcement Agency shall provide the 1tiliTxnesota ICAC Task
Fc�rce Cominauder in a timely ix�anner alt investigative equipment acquired ihrough grant funding
as a resutt of this Agreement in the evant f�iat: future federal fimding is no longer avaiJable, the
Undersia �ed Law EnforcemenC Agency decides to dissolve iis binding relatianship with the
�'Vlinncsota ICAC Task Fo�ce and the Saii2t Paul Poliee Department, ar the Undersigncd Law
En£orcemeuT Agcncy breaches the A�•eement.
I b. That The Undersiu�aed Law Enforce�nent Agency shall provide, ai no cost To Yhe Uraniee,
office space at the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (F3CA) Central Office location,
located at I430 Ma�yland Avenue E.ast, in St. Paal, Minnesata for the Lise of the Urantee's two
ICAC Task Force law enforcement officers. Graniee's two ICAC "1'ask Force iaw enforcement
officers assigned by the Grantee to �rork out of the BCA Central Oft'icc location will work
independenfly and congntently with tl�e [Jndersigned Law Bnforcement Age:ncy's ICAC unit as
neecled and available, and as a�zthorized by law.
17. Thai the Grantee shall reirnburse, to a�i amaLmt not to exceed �80,000.00, the Undersi�med
Law Enforcemeut A�ency for tlac costs of a computcr forensic analyst to perform tlie followiiig
duties:
Provide coinputer forensic support to the Undzrsi�*ned Law Enforcement Avencv's
I��tarnet Criines A�ainst Children Unit on related cases as assidned by the Undersiened
Law Enforcemeni A�ene��so that evidence can b sei7ed identi fied, and uro»er
doeiimentaEion GvriYten - 70°/n of time
a. Scize a31 relevant computers and associated peripherals or any device that is
capabie of sforing di�ital evidenee. Or�ani•re, catalog and appropriatelp store a11
inves�igative data xelated to cri��es against children and other relevant cases.
b. Analyze a1l data involved ui cr'tmes against ehildren cases, or oiher cases assi�ed
by Che Undersz�ned Law Enforcement Agency eGSing apprayed and tested
C' :DOCUKENTS A�iD S[PPWGS'�FXVI.�iSON'10CA1_ SETTI\GS��F.MP02ARY IN7'FRNFF FILLS\O CKSE�CCPY DK.4Ff Oi� S 7"A�LF,
ICAC AGREF.MF�"C US3tili CtTY GFN ICAC F02M (2) UOC
09-1374
hard�vare, softwaze, methodology.
c. �'alidation o£ any cquipment and software used for farensic examinalions.
d. Maintain all forensic hardware and soli+,vaze up to dat2 and in good u�orking
condition.
Present all rele�-ant im�estivative material to incesti�ators - I S% of t9me:
a. Independently plan, organize and devise tlic approach necessary to obtain useful
forensic infonnation from the evidence submitted, in accordance with
Undersi,gned Law Enforcement Agency's reguiations, state and federal fa«�s.
b. Provide incestigators with w� sumtnary of findings and prep:u appropriate
fonns and paperwork as necessary
Is res�onsible for - �% of time:
a_ Mai�taining conYacY �vith onb nating agency or investigator on status of case.
b. Appearing i.n state or federa] eourt to pcovide information on invcstigativa
findings.
Provide computer forensic assistance to other sections of the Undcrsigned Law
L-nForcerrient A�encyor to c�ther law enforcement agencies in the Undersigned Law
Gnforcement Avenc '�mplex major ineestiaations -5% of tiine:
a. Provide coniputer forerzsrc examination assistance to other secUOns or agencies in
the L:ndersigned Law Enforcemcnt A�ency's complex; investigations cither at the
Minuesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension or onsite.
b. Assisi other sections and!or agencies in special casework assignmeuts.
To perform other d�atiesls� ial ass9�unents as clirected by the Ui�dersiaued Law
Enforcement A�encti's S�ecial A,ent In Charee - 5% of time:
a. Establish and maintain contacis in fhe Minnesota tatv c�lforcemeni eon�mmuty.
b. Attend ail training sessions and staff mcetings as scheduled.
18_ Any amendmeiit io tlus Agreement xvust bc ixs writing and 1��i11 not be efFectice untii it has
bsen executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approced the ori� na]
agreement, or their successors in offce.
� 9. The Undersi�ned Law Enforcement Agency and the Grantee may Yem�inaTe this
AgreemenC at any tisne, with or without eause, upon 30 days' written notice to t1�e otl�er pariy.
T1xe Undersigued Law £?nforcement Agency n�ay iilnnediately terminate Iliis Agreeme�it if it does
not obtain fimding from Uie Yiinnesota Legislature, or other fu�iding source; or if fimding cannot
be conYinued aL a teve7 suff'icient to allow for ihe payntent of the services covered here.
Tennination must hc by written or fax notice to the Grantee. 1'he Undersi,�,ned Law Euforce�ucnt
Agcncy is not obligated to pay for ariy services that are ��rovided after notice a�1d effective dafe of
tennination. However, the Grantee will be enritled Yo payment, determined on a pro rata basis.
for scrvices s�tisfactorily pe��ornied to the extent that fmids are available. The State wi11 noY be
assessed any penalty if the A� eement is terminatec3 because of the decision of the Minnesota
Legislature, or other ftmding source, not to appropriate funds. The State rnust provide the
�rantee natice of the lack of fimding w�ithin a rzasouabie time of the State's receiving that no4ice.
C:1K1<'UbiEVLS fu�iD SE'I7'iVGS�EK;�UTSONIIAC.AL SHTCNGS�P.Nt1'ORARY 1�1TERNP,'I' i'11,k'.5VOLK�E:C,ITY DftAk'I'Oh Sl'nl'FC
�CA0.aGREbM1itiNT USING CI'fY Gfi?V iCAC 6"OAivt (2].DOC
09-1374
20. Terms of this agreement:
This .4greement shall be eFiective on the date the Undersigned Law Enforcemcnt Agency obtains
all required signatures under Minn. Stat. § 1bC.05, Subd. 2, and sl�all remain in effecti�•e thraugh
December 31, 2007 unIess tezminated or canceled. tipon the effective date of this Agreement,
the Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency zvi[t be entitIed to reimbursements approved b}
the Grantee dating back to July 1, 2006 for equipmenY, training and eapenses. Nothnlg in
tl�is Agi�ement shall oiherwise limit the jurisdiccion, powers, and responsi6ilities normally
pq"s,sessed b} an einplayee as a memUer of the L"ndersigned Law Enforcement A�ency.
M. Harrington, Cl�ief of PoGce
Paul Police Department
.-. -�
`� ' "� �'" ,�-�
y,�� ,,� �✓
_ �� —s' .,,�.mq c
, "°�.---
��� t_ � .
-r L J
D'a#e
L.=.`� 17 ^!�'—'' 1
J Date
�� � ���
Date
�'' �� °� �
Date
� -~ � `�� � �1 �
Date
tlndersiqned Law Enforcement Aqency certifies
thaf the appropriate person(s) have executed the
Agreement on behalf of the Undersiqned Law
Enforcement AgencV and its iurisdictional
qovemment entity as required bv appiicable
artides taws bv-laws resolutions: or or����'��— �������
��� _ � ���<
By and Title :-eG� 3 4,� s Date
MN DepartmentofAdministra5on �"�` `'�` �����"`��
(With deleqated authoritv)
C:?DOCUMLV'TS AND SFT3'I�GSR.tXNU PSON\LOCAL SP ]7iNGSW�B�dPORARY INTLANCI Pll,.h.SlOLKSE.CCSY DRAS� F OI' STATE
(GaC AGRFF:IrtEN1' C57�°G C7TY liliN ICAC FORYl {2) DOC
Human Rights Dfrector
09-1374
� � �: "
�" C%'L� ����.��'i_.,!
Ivlayor
City of Saint Paul
r
. �-
�:' �il �
C� ��
Date •
ANf�NllDtEN1' NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. t-1949 09-1374
t'his amendmenY is by and befweeu the State of Minnesota, aeting through its Commissioner of Public Safery, Bureau of
Criminal Apprehension ("lindersigned Lai� Enforcement Aaency ') and the City of St. Paul, actin� through its Police
Depart�zent {`Grantee"}.
Recitals
l. The L;ndeisi��ed Lau- Eniorcement �gency has a caniract with the G:antee identified as Rlinnesota Intemet Crin�es
A�ainst C3uldren Task Fosce h1uIv-_'�aency Iau Enforcement Joint Powers A�reement, identified as Cuntract r i-
1949 ("Ori�inal AereemenY') to join togeiher in a multi-aeency task foice intc:nded to investigate and prosacuce crimes
committed against ehildren and tbe crinvnal exploitation of children thaf is conu*vtfed ancL'or facilifated by or tlirough
the use of computers, and to disru�at and dismantle er�anizations engagin� in snch act;�zty.
2. This amendment is needed to extend this pro�ram through December 31, 2Q09 and increase the total reimbursement
amount ailacvable to flie Undersi�ned Law Enforcement .A�ency for hiring a eomputer £orensie analyst.
3. The Undersigned L�aw Enforcement Agency� and the Grantee are �viliing to amend.the Original t'tgcement as statetl
below.
Agreement Amendment
In this Amendment deTeted agreement terms will be struck out and tl�e uclded agreernem ter x�ll be ttn�erlined.
REVIS70A' 1. "I'he 4`�' Paragraph is amended as follows:
Whercas, the Grantee is the recipient of a federal grant {aYt�aohed to fhis Ageement as �xbibit A��d amended_in
E�ubiC B also a�hed) disbursed by ths Office of Juvenile Justice and De!'rnqnency Prevention {"C�JJDP") in
Washin�ton,1�.C. To assist Iaw cnforcement in inrestigatang and combaiuig the exploitacion of chiidren which accurs
through ehe use of computcts t�y providing funding f'ar equipment, trainin� and expenses, ineluding iravcl and oveitime
fundrng, �uhich are incurred by ]aw enfarcenacat as a result of such investlgations; and
REVISION 2. Sectian 17., the First Sentcnce is amended as follows:
That the Grazifee shall reimburse, to an amount not ta e�ceed 589 �230,000.00, the Undersigned La�+�
Enforcement tlgency for tl�e costs of a campute� Lc3rensic anaiyst to perform th� Eoliawing duties:
ItEVtSION 3. Section20., °`Terms aFthis Agreement" is amended as follotus:
This Agreemant sltall be ef#'eetive on £he date she Undcrsri�ed Law Bnforcement r�gency okrtaias all reqc�ired
si� atvres under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, 5ubd. Z, and sha11 remain in effertive zhrough ����,�;�, ^— '�? December
31 2�09 unless lerminaYed or canceled. C?pon the effective dflte of thzs f��eement, thc Undcesigaed T.avr En£orcement
lgency wilt be entitled to reimburse�nents ap��rovad by the Gran[ea dating back to July l, 2006 for equipnsent, trainang
and expenses. V othSng in this A�•eement ahull otherwise limit tl�e jurisdietion, powers, and cesperosibi3ifies namsally
passessed by an emgIoyee as a member oCtE�e Undersi�med Lnw Enforcement A�ency.
(THE REMr�I�IiNG POR`I'tON OF "I'I-iIS P�1�E W'AS TNTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
r�g�, or2
AMF,ND114F,NT NO. 1'CC) CONTRACT NO. I-1949
incorporated into this amendment by reference.
' �fS
Daic
Z-� ^ 0°�
Daie
City of int Pau1
t� �
r .. � �
Offic�ofFinan ial Sen�ices I�irector
City of Saint Paul
�� A ,
�r ��.
Mayor
City of Saint Paut
�
.�
su �,a m�r��: �
t3ndersigned Zaw n orcement Agency
� � O` t�
Bate
� �/� �
Date
7 �G��
Da e
�- /��0�
Date
09-1374
Unders'sgneci Law Enforcement �ency ceztSfies that flie appropriate perscm{s} have execuicci the Amendment on behalf of
t11� Ut7dersip�sd La�s• Ln£orceinenY Agency arrci its jurisdictional goverrunertC entity as rec}uired by appticable artieles,
la�vs, by-la��s, reso[uYions, or ordinanc�s_
��
i3y an Ti
Iv1NDepar�ment of 9dministration
(tYith deleglted autharityJ
Pa��e 2 of 2
�.1����
v�te
�J hn i11. I�arrintrtor., ChEef of Police
aint Paul Police D�artment
09-1374
W
U
Q
F-
�
N
�
a
�
Z
W
�
0
J
_
V
(�
Z
�
c �
C
M
d'
�
�
�
Q
G
�
U
U
U C
G
J
W
�
O
�
V
C7
O
J
E
L
d
�
� �
W �
� J
7
�
Q
W
�
W
�
0
H �
� �
0 F
�
O
t
�
�
W
�
�
Q
W c
G
�
a
h-
�
O
�
W
H
>
F
U
Q
N
�
W
J
m
O
�
a
m
�
�
�
w
J
m
0
Q..'
a
L ti
� o _ C ¢ w = m
O
c�i o o w � 00 � 3�
� 'Y �
.� 3 0. °�� v° o 0
i V r N� �� I� Z
y.. C tJ �' O N r N t�
F.O G O Y O N� a�+ �i N�CJ ��y .
w. o o e o�;� o����s �c
��.�As ��w..,zxt
� �; r; a �
h � � y \ �
�o c�:� m���� u a,,3 3 a,� � b 3 E.'�.` a
ww w a P.Uw �-� P�. G° s° c .�. �U "'v�.� ��
.� c�i ri v
�
09-1374
�
�
.�
L
�"'
d
U
a
3
A
a
C
.�
y
L. 0
�
i � G
v, m
_ � U
i y �f
a��
E `�'
d �
V `� o
� Q �c
c
U W
N
d
x
W
U
�
S:
T
p
�
T
O
E
�
F
w
W
(.)
� U
u
d �
A ""
� �
�
d ^
t3 �
d
� U >
C '.� L '
� .
� U
m R,
� �
0
y y N y
� U � �
a i.+ (� <J Q(� CJ v. U C�J Q(� 'V C'
a�... W dU pa� V qQU p
= YC] � ^��C�y� G]��
i� P.. csti ^ rr. C. cc�a C� m-o
CC r Cr � C C� � CJ Pw '^�+ L" Cr :-: C
a, �„ v � w m v� w �s v� w F v� � ca
d Q ¢ C
Sb �'n I5'n o"n
0 0 0 0
� �
� o
o �
f". � U N
C � .� � O G ro
a+ % � w P+ � .�. A. ..'�,
v� ie G ❑
i w � o � c�i � °J
0 �!
61 � V F.' � U G
�i � � � .�O � N L' L
� � 'O O cC � ,� 7
n' ��' ❑ C U� W O�
� �� `� o a 3 i a? a�i C
� w �. � � y . 'n C � '� s�.
� O s. � iC � LL �.'�+
°� a3 aw� v�3
L'+.�D .V
�
� O .� �
� �n � p Y�
�
�J y .'3 4.' w �n
^ � O N °' � N
s�, � o 0
'�..� c�) V CA n, � R
U j O � � O�A
y �n
n � �.����
O .. �o c> � q
o y
d .n L v� O 'O � �
� U ��' 'j ,� ..
y � � O cd
� � � ��
� ,� � 'L7 .� � R
� N � � c�d W �
� � .L' c s. V W �' � 0�9
U '�U �� �'iy �
c � � ��� O
z
C � N � N
�
N
W
0
U
�
Pr
�
0
.�
�
�
.�
O
U
�
�
O
a
N
I y
'w
�
m
� U
N �
� �"'
.--� .
U • y
�
C'. �
C'
W i�+
a�i =
� �
y � b0
U �
N �
� �
H M
O N
��
ti
w x�
Q�
O A
09-1374
d
�
.�
�
�
d
U
a
�
�
a
G
.
w
.y
d
e
L
�
P.
C
O
6�i �
d
i
G �
O 0
� �
� W
Y
u
d
Y �
W L1
Vf N
� .�+
U �
�U � �U
¢¢ v¢¢
c> U CC ci U
�� Ci���
o: � a. a: zs
6 m � d m
�}�
O11
� �
�; g
�, .c
U � W Y'-`
� � 17 .
o .� � y
❑ °' 3 � �
° -y a� ° .
c
w
G t3 � vi W
N
Y '
d .!.' � � Q
R' i y S.' G
� P�.. � 4� a
h
�
�
v, .0
ro �
O U
� y y
� 4'
E o w
� ""' o
Q � w
� y L
> °= °� ro
U Cf' � �
d � � �
A � � m
� � � �
b �
i �Tc�eQ wT
z R aw �
�
C �
� N
¢ E Q
U U U
a O � � �
_ � � � �
L �j r tC
C.. d Q ¢
y, �"„ U U U
cR.�aw ro w
a
Y
U
d
Y �
WA
c
0
i
Q
�
�'
�
G
H
G
W
q C
F �C
� �
� Q
b b
W LL�
E �"
� m
E � b
� � �.
w U p '°
� � � �
w "" A «
� � �
� � � �
� �
� L � � a �
Y � �
v' C� N N �
�.. �- w �. �'. � .0 . �
�
� � � V �
•G � '�O '� � ¢, N
O
�
ro �
CL
h �
N�
ii N
w �
� cu
N ni
� °' .. a "
� � - o 0
�
d � � ro �
R O 'O U 'O
� � � A m
� � M � �
b b
y O � � �
� c � co 'O
�
C � � �
�
N
O
N
�
cn
:�
y
�
0
.�
�
O
U
�
0
0.1
N
�
w
�
m
� U
L7 „�
� �
"D e'
.�'i
U "
y h
� p
� i
� �
�s
� U
„ bn
U .�
� �
s C . '`i
N '�
L�" M
� �
o �
ti
w�
Aq
O U
09-1374
Saint Paul Police Department Budget Detail Worksheet
Table of Contents
1.0 BUDGET DETAIL WORKSHEET
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 1 of 3
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
St. Paul Police Department
1.0 BUDGET DETAIL WORKSNEET
A. Consultants and Contracts
Position Annual Cost Percentage of Cost in $$
Time Devoted to
Project
Forensic Examiner (.5 FTE) $ 50,164.00 100 $ 50,164.00
TOTAL $ 50,164.00
' -� Lx q��llie�.G �w i+ � i�. '' E i y �' .; tY � t y k_ `
x.h :F,, .S _�
_.� v . . _,. .�... .. . . , . ._.. .. . . ._., .. .�_ . _ .... ...v.. ....
Item Computation Cost in $$
Forensic Workstations 10 @ $4,000 $ 40,000.00
Cell Phone Analysis Tool 10 @$3,500 35,000.00
SANA Digital Storage (14 terabytes) 1@$ 60,oQ0 60,000.00
Write Blocker Set 2@$1,600 3,200.00
1.5-Terabyte Hard Drive 30 @$1b0 4,800.00
Network Storage Enclosure (Server) 6@$505 3,030.00
TOTA[, $ 146,030.00
e �' �- � �"-�+��:�� ��..h¢'�, � :� 'f �t F'*f �r�,.�yn�� � w� ��:� L , �s ��..s� �:i�= -:
� ����t� �,�L5����'�� '� s s� j ����`� � "`�� y �,� ���� '.� � !� ��� k z `�`� . '
; i�-ic:; �:� � x ti. -s���, an fi ��'. . �m'-c�._,�.� § , ;N'"t�'-p'^n.: �? �k� ;�' ,..4 n_CS '�S`.x��'a tt, �`i R :i
.s�s.. ....�� � 9 x i� , k'.s �i �s��
Item Computation Cost in $$ n
Software: Access Data FTK 13 @$2,350 $ 30,550.00
Software Licenses: Access Data (12-month) 5@$684 3,420.00
Sofiware: Webcase Online Investigations 15 @$600 9,000.00
Software: Encase 3 @ $3,000 9,000.00
Software: Camtasia Studio 17 @$200 3,400.00
Training: Access Data FTK Boot Camp Training 30 @ 1,600 48,000.00
Training: Cell Phone Porensics 2@$2,000 4,000.00
Training: Macintosh Forensics 1@$1,500 1,500.00
Training: Encase 1 @ $2,000 2,000.00
Intemet Safety Campaign: School Training 75Q @$3333 25,OOQ.�O
Package
Intemet Safety Campaign: Parent/Child 10,762 @$ I.00 10,762.00
Handouts
TO'rp[, $ 146,632.00
OJJDP F1' 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 1 of 3
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
St. Paul Police Department
09-1374
D. Travel
Purpose of Location, Item Source of Computarion Cost in $$
Travel If Known Travel
Policies
Applied
TBD Airfaze Applicant 10 trips @$500/trip $ 5,000.00
TBD Lodging Applicant 10 trips; 5 nights/trip; 5,500.00
Training $110/night x 50 nights
N/A Per diem Applicant 10 trips; 5 days/trip; 2,500.00
$50/day x 50 days
TOTAL $13,000.00
_ _
Budget Category Cost in $$
A. Consultants and Contracts $ 50,164.00
B. Equipment 146,030.00
C. Other Costs 146,632.00
D. Travel 13,000.00
ToTnL Pao�ECT Co5rs $ 355,826.00
FEDERAL REQUEST $ 355,826.00
NON-FEDERAL AMOUNT $ .00
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 2 of 3
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assirtance
Saint Paul Police Department Budget t�Iarrat�ve
Tabie of Contents
1.0 BUDGET NARRATIVE .........................................
l.l Forensic Examiner Position ....................................
1 .2 Equipment .................................................................
1 .3 Other Costs ................................................................
1.3.1 Computer Software ......................................
1 .3.2 Training ..........................................................
1 .3.3 Travel .............................................................
1.3.4 Statewide Internet Safety Campaign.........
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's AssisWnce
.............. 2
.............. 2
................................................. 3
................................................. 4
................................................. 4
Error! Bookmark not defined.
................................................. 5
................................................. 6
Page 1 of b
St. Paul Police Department
09-1374
1.0 BUDGET NARRATIVE
This narrative explains and justifies each budget item presented in the Budget Detail
Worksheet. For each budget item, we also reference the corresponding section of the Program
Narrative.
Overhead costs and indirect costs were not included because they aze not applicable. There
will be no subgrant awards.
MICAC acknowiedges that the grant period runs from June 1, 2009 ttu�ough May 31, 2011.
We will comply with all PROTECT Act requirements, including but not limited to tracking
and reporting requirements.
1.1 FORENSIC EXAMINER POSITION
MICAC is requesting the continued grant funding for one .5 FTE forensic examiner
position to meet MICAC's staffing needs. This individual's fime is 100-percent-dedicated to
MICAC activities. The individual who fills this position will be a BCA employee, and the BCA
will bill SPPD for their time; for purposes of MICAC administration, this is a contract position.
The salary calculafion is presented in the table below. Fringe benefits are included in the
salary totals but are not calculated separately because this is a contract position. The total cost for
the one .5 FTE forensic examiner position for the grant period (Fiscal Year 2009-2010) is
$50,164. 00.
Position Total Cost
One .5 FTE Farensic Examiner $ 50,164.00
TOTAL COST FOR POSITION FOR ONE-YEAR GRANT PERIOD $ SO ,164.00
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 2 of 6
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
St. Paul Police
09-1374
For more information on justification for this position, please see Proposal Narrative
Section 33.1, Forensic Examiner Position.
1.2 EQUIPMENT
MICAC is requesting $146,030.00 for equipment. Requested equipment includes the
foliowing items:
10 computer forensic workstations — This equipment will be used in the 10 forensic
hubs created under this grant. The cost for this equipment is $4Q000.00.
10 cell phone analysis tools — This equipment will be used in the 10 farensic hubs
created under this grant. The cost for this equipment is $35,000.00.
• SANA digital storage equipment — This equipment will be used at the MICAC
headquarters in St. Paul. The cost for this equipment is $60,000.00.
Equipment costs are summarized in the table below. For more information on
justification for this equipment, please see Proposal Narrative Section 3.3.3, Equipment
and Training.
■ Peripherals - MICAC is requesting $11,030.00 for computer peripherals. Funds will be
used to purchase items that include, but are not limited to, write-blockers, hard drives and
servers. These and similar items are needed to conduct forensic examinations and
maintain digital evidence. MICAC requests that these funds be allocated on an as-needed
basis throughout the grant period. The costs of peripherals are summarized in the table
below. This budget item is discussed in Program Narrative Section 33.3, Equipment and
Training.
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Cnmes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 3 of 6
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
St. Paul Police
09-1374
Item Quantity Cost Per Item Total Cost
Write Blocker Set 2 $ 1,600.00 $ 3,200.00
1.5 Terabyte Hazd Drive 30 $ 160.00 4,800.00
Network Storage Enclosure (Server) 6 � 505.00 3,030.00
TOTAL PERIPHERALS FOR ONE-YEAR GRANT PERIOD $ 11,030.00
Item Quantity Cost Per Item Total Cost
Forensic Workstations 10 $ 4,000.00 $ 40,000.00
Ceil Phone Analysis Tool 10 $ 3,500.00 35,000.00
SANA Digital Storage (14 terabytes) 1 $ 60,000.00 60,000.00
Peripherals See above 11,030.00
TOTAL EQUIPMENT FOR ONE-XEAR GRANT PERIOD $ 146 �030.00
1.3 OTHER COSTS
Other costs include computer software, peripherals, training, travel, and the statewide
Internet safety campaign. Each is discussed separately below.
1.3.1 Computer Software
MICAC is requesting $55,370.00 for softwaze to meet our forensic and investigative needs.
We will use the funds to purchase and renew software licenses t1�at include, but are not limited to
the following: Accessdata, Encase, Webcase Online Investigations, and Camtasia Suite. New
software will support the ten new forensic hubs that will be established and supported under this
grant. Renewed software licenses are needed to maintain the current level of forensic support
provided to MICAC by our FAs.
Software licenses vary greatly in price—from $200 for Camtasia to thousands of dollars
for Accessdata and Encase tools. MICAC requests that these funds be allocated on an as-needed
basis throughout the grant period.
OJJDP FY 09 Inteme[ Crimes Against Chitdren Task Force Program Continuation Page 4 of 6
CFDA # 16.543: Missing Children's Assistance
St Paul Police
Sofiware costs are summarized in the table below. This budget item is discussed in
Program Nanative Section 333, Equipment and Training.
09-1374
Item Quantity Cost Per Item Total Cost
AccessData Farensic Tool Kit 13 $ 2,350.00 $ 30,550.00
AccessData Monthly Maintenance 5 $ 684.00 3,420.00
(12-month licenses}
Webcase Online Investigations I S $ 600.00 9,000.00
Encase 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00
Camtasia Studio 17 $ 200.00 3,400.00
TOTAL SOFTWARE FOR ONE-YEAR GRANT PERIOD $ 55�370.00
1.3.2 Training
MICAC is requesting $55,500.00 for training registration. Training sessions are needed for
the following personnel:
• Affiliate MICAC personne] who will be supporting the new forensic hubs established
through this grant and
■ FA examiners who need to keep current with new software tools, as weil as new and/or
advanced techniques. Training topics will include, but not be limited to, AccessData and
Encase software, Macintosh computer operations, cell phone training, and personal
digital assistant (PDA) training. Training costs are summarized in the table below. This
budget item is discussed in Program Narrative Section 3.3.3, Equipment and Training.
Item Quantity Cost Per Item Total Cost
AccessData FTK Boot Camp Training 30 $ 1,600.00 $ 48,000.00
Cell Phone Forensic Training 2 $ 2,000.0� 4,000.00
Macintosh Forensic Training 1 $ I,500.00 1,500.00
Encase Training 1 $ 2,000.00 2,000.00
TOTAL TRAINING FOR ONE-YEAR GRANT PERIOD $ 55,500.00
OJJDP FY 09 Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program Continuation Page 5 of 6
CFDA # 16.543: Miuing Children's Assistance
St. Paul Police
1.3.3 Travel
09-1374
We request grant funding for travel, lodging, and per diem expenses for a total of 10 out-
of-town training sessions for the MICAC commander to attend mandatory quarterly DOJ ICAC
Commanders' Meetings, Fox Valley ICAC Prosecutors Training, and out-of-town for forensic
training and the ICAC National Conference. We have estimated travel expenses at $13,000.00.
Travel costs are sunnmarized in the table below. This budget item is identified in Program
Narrarive Section 3.3.3, Equipment and Training.
Item Quantity Cost Per Item Total Cost
Airfare 10 trips $ 500.00 $ 5,000.00
L,odging (10 trips @ 5 nights per trip) 50 nights $ 110.00 5,500.00
Per Diem (10 trips @ 5 days per trip) 50 days $ 50.00 2,500.00
TOTAL TRAVEL FOR ONE-YEAR GRANT PERIOD $ 13�000.00
1.3.4 Statewide Internet Safety Campaign
MICAC requests grant funding for a statewide Internet Safety Campaign. The BCA will
develop and present this campaign in coordination with MICAC.
As noted in the table below, associated costs are estimated at $ 35,762.00. This budget
item is discussed in Program Narrative Section 333, Equipment and Training.
Item Quantity Cost Per Item Total Cost
School Training Packages 750 $3333 $25,000.00
ParentrChild Handouts 10,762 $ 1.00 10,762.00
TOTAL SAFETY CAMPAIGN COSTS FOR ONE-YEAR GRANT PERTOD $ 35,'762.00
OJJDP FY 09 internet Crimes Against Chiidren Task Force Program Continuation Page 6 of 6
CFDA # t 6.543: Missing Children's Assistance
09-1374
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
between OJ3DP, U.S. Aitorney and 1CAC Task �orce.
PARTIES
The grantee, St. Paul Poiice Depa�tment, 3S7 Grove St., St. Paui, MN, 55101 is the
recipient of a United States Deparkment of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs
(OJP), Offiice of Juveniis dustice and Delinquency Pseven#ion (OJJDP) grant to enforce
laws regarding in#emet crimes against chiidren {ICAC), and the grantee utilizes this
grant for the soie purpose of administering and operafing an ICAC Task Force. The
grantee agrees to work with the dffice af the 1Jnited States Attorney for the District of
Minnesota to suppart and advance the goals of Project Safe Childhood, a DOJ fiitiative.
The parties to this Memorandum of Understanding (NVOU} ass the grantee, OJJDP, and
the United States Attomey's Oifice for the District of Minnesota.
OVERVIEW / MiSS10N STATEMENT
QJJDP administers the ICAC Task Force Program, which is a nationa! neiwdrk ot state
and focal taw enfoccement investigative units. The natiana( ECAC gragram assists stste
and local law enforcement agencies to develop an effective respanse to child
pornography cases and the sexual assault and abuse af children Eacilita#ed by
technology. Fi�anciai assistance from OJJDP provides monies fo� the investigative and
forensic work of the grantee, training and technicai assistance, vic#im services, and
community educatian. Due in large part to the technoiogicai aspects oi these cases, the
1CAC Task Force Program prorootes a multi jurisdictional, multi-agency approach to
investigating and prosecuting ICAC cases. Th� grantee acknowteciges that a(( tCAC
Task Forces act as partners in a nationwide ei#art to combat chiid exploitafion facilitated
through the use of Yechnaiogy.
ICAC's goals are to increase the invesYigafions and prosecutions of Internet crimes
against chiidren offenses, and to increase pubiic awareness and prevention oi ICAC
offenses. The nafional poticy objecfives for ICACs are: (1) increase the irnestiga#ive
capabilities, inciuding effec#iveness and e�ciency, of law enforcement offiicers in the
defectian, investigation of quaEifying affenses and the apprehension of offenders; (2)
IIlC�eBSe the RUt11b2T Of ICAC-gUatifylstg {State and federal) offenses being prosecuted;
{3) create a muiti-agency task force response to ICAC offenses; {4) enhance the
nattonw"sde response to tCRC of#enses; and {5) develop and deliver ICAC public
awareness and prevention programs.
09-1374
The primary purpose of the iCAC Task Force program is to investigafe, prosecute, and
deter the possession, production, and distribution of child pamography and the
utiiization of the Internet to seek children as sexual victims.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this MOU is to define the responsibilities o# the grantee, an ICAC Task
Force, and the LS.S. Department of Justice.
lNVESTlGATiONS
4CAC Taslc Fflrces may include investigators, supervisors or prosecutors from various
Iocai state, and federal law enforcement agencies who provide assistance subject to
availability.
}t is the mission of the graniee to identify and investigate individuals who exploit children
for sexua{ purposes through the use of #echno(ogy andior who ab#ain, distribute, and/or
produce child pomography. As pari of the primary mission, the ICAC Task Force must
be focused on presenting evidence of crimina! activity to pcasecutors which then leads
to the successfui prosecufion of individuals who have commitEed coercionlenticement or
child pornography offenses. 7he grantee musY also sponsor community education
efforts regarding the prevention oi internet crimes against chitdren and provide ICAC
training fio oYher state and Iocal taw enfiorcement officiais.
As paR of its primary mission, each ICAC Task Force will:
Conducf undercover ICAC investigations; and
2. Conduct reactive investigations for which venue lies within the lCAC Task
Force's jurisdiction{s}, including investigations of child pornography,
CYBERTIP refersals from the N�tional Cen#er for Missing and Exploited
Chiidren {NCMEC), Internet Service Provider and law enforcement
referrais, other ICAC-relaEed investigations and other sources.
The grantee will ensure tha#:
(1) only sworn taw en#arcement personnei wiil conduct undercover ICAC investigations,
(2} each investigatar involved with undercover ope�ations has received ICAC training
prior to initiating proactive investigations, and (3) ICRC investigations shall also be
govemed by the nationa[ iCAC program's Operational and investigative Standards
(aitached).
Violation of the 1CAC opera#ionai standards is eause for cancellation of the grant with
OJJDP.
09-1374
V`Jhere invest+gations reveal that the sa#ety of a child is at risk, it is of paramount
importance that the safety and well-being of the child cieariy oufweigh any consideration
being given to the continued investigation.
lCAC Task Forces have a substantiai number af ma8ers to inves#igate which requires
prioritization of these matters. The grantee agrees to use the guideiines in the 1CAC
Operational and investigative Standards to prioritize cases:
Rn additionai role of ICAC Task Forces is to educate both chiidren and parents
regarding online dangers, and empower them with infarmation so they may surf the
Internet in safety. Task farce personnei wiU conduct educatian and prevention
programs to foster awareness and provide practicai, relevant guidance #o chiidren,
parents, educatars, librarians, the business community, and other individuals concerned
about Internet chiid safety issues.
GOALS FOR CASES PROSECUTED
Cases investigated by the ICAC Task Force may be prosecuted in Federal or 5tate
Court.
The grantee agrees that the criteria for determining whether fo prosecute a particular
violation in state or federal court wiil be defermined based upon the forum in which the
greatest overali benefit to fhe pubtic witl be achieved. The parties agree that the
greatest overalf benefit to the pub(ic and victims wil! be achieved in fhe forum in which
the purposes of punishment wili be accompiished to the greatest passibie extent. The
perties agree that the sentences in tCAG cases should, to the greatest possibie extent,
(a) reflect the seriousness of the offense, {b} promote respect for the law, (c} provide
just punishment for the offense, jd} afford adequafe deterrence to criminal conduct, (s)
protect the public from further crimes of the defendant, and (fl to provide #he defendant
with needed educationat or vacationa{ train'sng, medica� case, or othar cosrectionaR
treatment in the most etfective manner. Given these goals and #he research regarding
the typica! hands-on offense histories of thase convicted as on-line predators and child
pornography offenders, incarceration is a desired oufcome in ICAC cases_
The United Siates Attomey's Office for the District of Minnesota will provide federai
prosecution support for the Task Force and has committed to prosecute cases
investigated by the ICAC Task Force Agencies.
�m
The grantee is responsibie and liabie for the acts and omissions of its own officers,
agents or emplayees in connection with the perfo�mance of their official duties under
this MOU.
09-1374
REPORTING STATl5T3CS
The grantee wilt provide quarterly reports to the Department of Jusfice on the iCAC
Case Tracking Form. The grantee is respansibie for reporting data of its subgrantees
as part of this unified report.
��
The grantee shal! make investigators designated as Task Force rnembers avaifabie for
applicabie speciaGzed training provided through the natianal ICAC program and other
appropriafe training programs.
iu � •
Media outreach on cases must be coordinated with the prosecutor to whom the case
has been or wiil be referred in order to ensure compiianee with appiicabie bar ruies.
CONFIDENTIALITY
It is understood that any confidential information pertaining #o investigations of Intemet
Crimes Against Chiidren +nriii be heit3 in the strictest confidence, and will only be shared
with participating ICAC Task Force members or other taw enforcement agencies w�ere
necessary or as afherwise permifted by federal andlar state law.
CONSISTENCY
No locak agreement can be inconsistent with any ptovision herein or impair achievement
of any provision herein.
09-1374
EFFECTNE DATE
This agreement shall be effective on February 1, 2008 and continue unfii such time as
#ederal funding for the Grant ends or the agreement is canceled by either party upon
wr�tten notice deiivered to both agency ditectors.
Forthe
Justice and
Prevention
the ICAC TasR Forc� ("grantee°}
;' , . , � a
z `t
,� �
��,{,!�'� � L� , . ��'E�'L �,•,_��
�
For the tlnited State.sAttomey`s C3ffice
� �� �� �
° Date=
�- -� �
Qate
�- f,������'
Date
City of Saint Paul
Interdepartmental Memorandum
To: Mazgaret Kelly, Finance Duector
From: Chris Eitemiller, Sr. Budget Analyst�
Subject: Police Budget Amendment to establish financing & spending plan for 2009
Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Grant
Date: December 2, 2009
The attached resolution accepts and establishes a financing and spending plan for a state law
enforcement grant. The grant is with the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. This grant will span both
2009 and 2010. The 2010 portion has been included in the 2010 technical amendments. The 2009
portion of this grant is for $120,000 and will pay for updated forensic workstations and digital storage
for investigations, as well as a full-time forensic examiner. The examiner would be a contract employee
and not a permanent position. I expect the department will make a push to keep this person beyond
2010, but that can be discussed during the 2011 budget process.
Because this will amend the Police budget, this will require a public hearing. It will be on the Council's
agenda December 16�`, as the first and third meetings each month aze the opportunities for budget
amendments.
This proposal seems reasonable, I recommend signing.
AA-ADA-EEO Employer