191023ORIGINAL TO GtITY CLERK • s��
CITY OF ST. PAUL FILE NCiI NO.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
COUNCIL OSOLUTION— GENERAL FORM
PRESENTED BY R //�
COMMISSIONED , DATA
RESOLVED, that upon appeal of Charles J.�Mishek, M. D.
from the decision of the Commissioner of Parks, Playgrounds
and Public Buildings, the south property line along Larpenteur
Avenue between Lexington Avenue,,and Dunlap Street, as it
pertains to Lots 6 and 7, Block 1. Clifton Dale Ramsey
County, Minnesota, is. hereby established as the building
line on said property.
COUNCILMEN
Yeas Nays
DeCourcy
Holland
Mortinson
Peterson
Rosen
Winkel
Mr. President, Dillon
5M 5.5s QW 2
Council File No. 191023 —By Bernard
T. Holland —
Resolved, That upon appeal of
Charles J. Mishek, M.D. from the de-
cision of the Commissioner of Parks,
Playgrounds and Public Buildings, the
south property line along Larpenteur
Avenue between Lexington Avenue
and. Dunlap Street, as it pertains to
Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, Clifton Dale
Ramsey County, Minnesota, is hereby
established as the building line on
said property.
Adopted by tlje Council February 17,
1959.
Approved February 17, 1959.
i (February 21, 1959)
FEB 17 1959
Adopted by the Council 19—
FEB 17 1959
Approve cam\ 19—
►r Z
Mayor
OFFICE OF CITY CLERK
BUREAU OF RECORDS
386 City Hall and Court House
St. Paul 2, Minnesota
Mr. Marshall F. Hurley
Corporation Counsel
Building
Dear Sir:
e--.— ..,*
February j, 1959
4c'
JOSEPH R. OKONESKI
Ci +y Clerk
HAROLD J. RIORDAN
Council Recorder
191 023
I
The City Council requested that you prepare a resolution granting the
attached a eal of Charles J. Mishek, M. D. for relaxation of parking
lot standa 9 RBMSS tRc�hgegb ttF @ia @)of Larpenteur Ave. between
Lexington Ave. and Dunlap St., also described as Lots 6 and 7, Block 1,
Clifton Dale Addition, in accordance with plans approved January 8, 1959•
Very truly yours,
�a
City Clerk av/
1
FEB 6 - 9015$
MINNESOTA
8<D.
0
................
: ;' RD OF ZONING, CITY OF SAINT PAUL
••••• ? ?: k #•�t............
741 -733 -733 1013 CITY NAIL AND COURT NbUS1 .SAINT PAUL 2, IN
...........................
........................
February 4, 1959
Mr. Joseph Okoneski
City Clerk
Building
Dear Sir:
This is in the matter of the application of,Cbarles J. Misbek, M.D. for a permit
to install and operate a 20 car private parking lot for staff and patients, and
an appeal to relax the parking lot standards on property located adjacent to the,
south side of Larpenteur Avenue bbtween Lexington Avenue and Dunlap Street. The
legal description of the property is Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, Cliftondale Addition.
This property was reclassified from "A`° Residence to Commercial by the City Council
on January 9, 1959, C. F. 190402, for the purpose of erecting a one story doctor's
office building with off-street parking accessory thereto.
This property has a frontage of 120 feet along Larpenteur Avenue and a depth of 125:5
feet which results in an area of 15,060 square feet.
The adjacent land uses are as follows: north across Larpenteur Avenue is the new
Roseville Shopping Center; west and adjoining is vacant undeveloped land; farther
west across Dunlap Street, in the next block, are the California Drive Apartments;
south across an alley are single family residences fronting on California Avenue;
east and adjoining is a liquor store and parking lot accessory thereto; east of the
liquor, store is a grocery store and customer parking lot.
The Traffic Engineer has approved the layout and operation of the parking lot, and
the plans, with one exception, meet the standards for this type of facility. It
is necessary to appeal the required front yard set back in order to have a sufficient
area for the parking lot. The present required parking lot set back from Larpenteur
Avenue is 121 feet, and the'applicant is asking for a set back of zero (0) feet.
Field investigations discloses that the relaxation of the set back from Larpenteur
Avenue will not be detrimental to the adjoining or surrounding properties based
on present and probable future land use development in the area.
In consideration of the above factors, the Board of Zoning recommends the granting
of the permit for the parking, lot, and the approval of the appeal to relax the
front yard set back requirements on the above described property, all in accordance
with plans approved January 8, 1959.
Sincerely,
Herbert C. Wieland
f Planning Director
HCW:FGI
Encl .,
1 "
F
N
y
RICHARD E. KLEIN
ATTORNEY AT LAW
WEiT FIRST NATIONAL BANKoBUILOING
SAINT PAUL 1, MINNESOTA
January 8,-1959
Hon. Mayor and City Council
City of St. Paul
Court House
St. Paul 2, Minnesota
Re: Appeal of Chas. J. Mishek, M. D.
Gentlemen:
CAPITAL 4 -4911
As attorney for Dr. Mishek, who has made application
for a parking lot which does not conform with the - ordinances, I am
writing this letter of appeal. The information pertinent to the
appeal is as follows:
1. Name of Applicant:
Chas. J. Mishek, M. D.
2. Legal Description of Premises:
Lots, 5, 6 & 7, Block 1, Clifton Dale Addition
3. Street Location:
Property is located on the South side of Larpenteur
Avenue approximately 160 feet west of Lexington Parkway.
4. Proposed Development:
It is proposed to construct a doctors' building as per
the attached plans for the care and treatment of
patients. It is proposed to provide in connection
with this doctor's building adequate off street parking
for patients and also for the staff.
5. Purpose of Appeal:
The purpose of this appeal is that the proposed design
of the parking area is contrary to the provisions of
the Legislative Zoning Code,.Chapter 60.23, paragraph
5, sub - sections (c) and (d) ,which provides for a' set back
from the street and also for no parking closer than
eight feet to the adjacent property.
6. Necessity of Appeal:
It is necessary for this appeal to be taken to-obtain
Hon. Mayor and
City Council
V 1 ✓
-2- 1 -8 -58
a relaxing of the provision relating to the set back
of the required distance from the adjoining property
as the strict enforcement of the provisions would
leave only spaces for parking seven patient's vehicles
which would be entirely inadequate, while relaxing
of these provisions, as can been seen from the attached
plan, would permit the parking of seven additional
vehicles, or a total of fourteen patients' vehicles.
Any number less than the fourteen would be inadequate
and would work a hardship on the doctors and patients.
7. Sections Under Which Appeal is Taken:
Legislative Zoning Code, Chapter 64.03, paragraph(�,)and
Chapter 64.03, paragraph (t).
8. Parking Capacity:
Upon the proposed plan as submitted, there would be
parking provided for six cars of the members of the
staff and fourteen cars of patients. If the Legislative
Zoning Code, Chapter 60.23, paragraphs 5 (c) and (d)
were strictly enforced, there will be only parking for
the six vehicles of the staff members and seven patients'
automobiles.
9. General Information:
While this area for'the proposed parking lot adjoins
"A" residential district, which by the zoning code
would require the set back, it is felt that this
provision should not be strictly enforced by the very
nature of the area in which this proposed clinic is
located. Directly to the east are four lots zoned
"Commercial" and which are used for commercial purposes
including off street parking. Directly to the north,
while not within the corporate limits of the City of
St. Paul, is a large shopping center with off street
parking extending from the property line at Larpenteur
Avenue north severalfeet to the building lines.
The lots directly to the west of this proposed doctors'
building and parking area, although zoned "A" residential,
are not used for such purposes today and by their very
location it would seem highly doubtful that they would
ever be used as a practical matter for class "A" residency.
Yours very truly,
OICHAWRDE. KLEIN
ter * & -7
Est. o+�hc �D t
�.I�ro.t� n�at.� AontYtood
[Sr, rAUL M1NNEiISOTN
-- Ail. cp
SOLO
FaTawic I
i DERT&L
NJI LID 1.14G
i
IM A.N --
LA�PEN � E.VP
��oi�s� -D Do�ToP.S �v � L�Di�Ca
L��. C+1�S • J M►SHIC 4 'b12,
a`!
+f
�NVE . DEC 1958
cill U
pa ,
Paul, Minnesota
IFo�
TFi oS . W. V GTFE L.
T� •vU . Jo¢1NSO1�l
- 'S7.