09-1128Couucil File # �'� � �� c r S
Green 5heet #3075496
CITY
Presented
AUL, MINNESOTA
�y
1 BE IT RESOLVED, that the city council authorized the Ciry of Saint Paul, Police Department to enter into the
2 attached Auto Theft grant agreement with the State of Minnesota, which includes an indemnification clause. A copy
3 of said ageement is to be kept on file and on record in the Office of Financial Services.
of.
Adopted by Council: Date \ C7 I �/,�( p G'�
Adopti rtifie�by C c' ec er ��—
By� I ,��%
Appxoved by y Date �U
By:
RESOLUTION
By: _
.
Approved y Mayor for Submission to Council
s �E1c�,�.�. �
�
�t-����
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet
- -- --- -- -- --- - -- ----,
� DepartmentlOffice/Councfl: , Date Initiatetl: �
; Pp _ Police Department �, ��_pUG-09 ' GPeen Sheet NO 3075496
------ '------ '------------------
ConWct Person 8 Phorre: , Deoartrnent Sent To Person InitiallDate '
' Chief John Harrinqton • y 0 Pofice Department �� � Police Dep artment __ ___ �
' 266-5588 ; I I�ohce DeDartment Polue Deparimeot �
__ �_ __
- - - - � - - ' Assi9n , � � -
__ _ ___ _ _ -_ _ _- _- .
2 C�t�Attomey C�ty Attomev � .
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): ' Number � .- ,-- ,
_ -_—
' ; For 3 �'ioaocial Se . __ _ _ _ _ __ � i Directo_�F __' _ �
' ____ __- . —_
`��--�-- ��------------ � Routing : 4 r hlayor'sOffice___ _!,__ M ayor '
�
'� Doa Type: RESOLUTION Order ' S Coancd ��--- __ _ __ __--�- --' �-__ Counci --___ _ __ _ _ '�,
. ____. ._... _ _
� - ___ -_ _ ____----
' � 6 C iiv Clerk _ � � Ci ty Cler I '�
_ _ _-.__. _ _ _ —_ ___—
__.__- __-.________ _- �_ �_- -4- ___,- P- ��
,, E-Document Required: Y �. '� 7 yotice De arlment ___ i Police De artment �___ __ I,
Document Cofrtact: Evette Scarver i l '�
I ! �_. __. . ___- ___._-_____i
Total # of Si nature�Pa es _ Cli All Locations for Si I
Contaet Phone: 26& 541 ;
- -
; � - - - _� -- ---- -- ---- -
- - --- -- -- - � --- --- - --
' 9 9 ( P 9nature) :
�_.__. __.__- ____._. _ �_ ______.. _ _________ . _____ --__ -_. _ -___- __ _ .._ __- _-_ -___..._ ___ ---___-_ �
� Action Requested:
� Signatures on the attached council resolution authorizing the City of Saint Paul, Police Deparhnent to enter into the attached ��
�, agreement with the Minnesota Departrnent of Public Safety. ,
�- � - ----- ------ -- --------- -- -- ---------- ------- - i
� Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): �� I Personal Service Contracts Must Answerthe Foilowing Questions. � '
� Planning Commission j �. Has this persoNfirtn ever worked under a contract for this department?
CIB Committee � Yes No
� Civil Service Commission � 2. Has this personlfirm ever been a city employee? �I
., ' I Yes No i
3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not nofmally possessed by any i
i ourrent city employee? �
, Yes No
; Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet. '�
I ___ .___ _ � . ___ _ -_ __- _ _- _ __ �__ __.-__.__
' __- _ - _ _'__'-- _—" __. —'_-'. _"_'- - J
�I Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): I
�' Ttte City of Saint Paul, Police Deparhnent has received an Auto Theft grant from the Minnesota Deparhment oF Public Safety. I
I Authorization is needed to enter into an grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety. ',
I
---- � - ---- - �---
- - --- .. .. - ---- - ___ ._ ---- ------- ---- --- --
AdvanWges If Approvetl: �
The Auto Theft grant provides funding to teduce incidence of automobile theft.
�---- ---- -- ------------ --------- --
I Disadvantages If Approved:
I None.
I I
� -- - --------- -- ----------- --�-------_._----
� Disativantages If Not Approved:
! Lost of gtant funds available to reduce the incidence of automobile theft.
I
j __.__-_- _______. __-__— __ . _-- __-_- ___- —__.__.____— _-____
Total Amount of
' Trensaction: $242,896.00 CosURevenue Budgeted:
' Fundiny source: State of Minnesota Activity Number: 34160
Financial Information:
(Explain)
August 11, 2009 3:34 PM
��.� � y . , ,
_ � �i,' t_.., :�
I
�,'. ::., .. , _�.... �
,� + =e s
Page 1
STATE OF D�IIIVNESOTA 09-1128
GRANT CONTRACT
This grant contract is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Commerce ("State") and Saint
Paul Police Depamnent, 367 Grove Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 ("Grantee").
Recitals
1. Under Minn. Stat. § 299A.01 and § 65B.84, the State is empowered to enter into this grant.
2. The State is in need of projects to reduce the incidence of automobile theft.
3. The Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this grant contract to the
satisfaction of the State.
Grant Contract
1 Term of Grant Contract
1.1 Effective date: July 1, 2009, or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes Section
16C.05, subdivision 2, whichever is later.
The Grantee must not begin work under this grant contract until this contract is fully executed and the
Grantee has been noti5ed by the State's Authorized Representative to begin the work.
1.2 Expiration date: June 30, 2011), or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first.
1.3 Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this grant contract: 8. Liability;
9. State Audits; 10. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property; 12. Publicity and Endorsement; 13.
Governing Iaw, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and 15 Data Disclosure.
2 Grantee's Duties
2.1 Activities. The Grantee, who is not a state employee, will perform the necessary duties and tasks for the Auto Theft
Prevention Project identified in grant RFP and the applicaYion submitted by the Grantee which is attached and
incorporated into this grant contract.
A. A successful Auto TheR Prevention Project will have one or more of the following outcomes:
1. Reduce the incidence of automobile theft.
2. Support protracted or complex investigations or programs that tazget repeat offenders.
3. Improve the techniques or expand the resources of existing auto theft prevention investigation,
apprehension, or prosecution activities.
4. Support multi jurisdictional projects combining the resources of different agencies in a task force approach
to prevent, investigate, and prosecute auto theft.
5. Identify and apprehend organized auto theft rings.
6. Increase the availability of education and training programs to develop the expertise of auto theft
investigators, the judiciary, prosecutors, and driver and vehicle services exam inspections staff.
7. Make available training and public education programs on a statewide or local level.
8. Increase public awazeness of the common methods of automobile thefts, the automobile models most likely
to be stolen, and the times and locations automobile thefts aze most likely to occur.
9. Increase the availability of specialized equipment including, but not limited to: locks, alarms,
tracking/surveillance devices, and specialty tools intended to prevent or deter auto thefts.
B. Post awazd requirements
1. All certifications governing compliance with State requirements such as worker's compensation, data
privacy, fmancial compliance, and affirmative action are included as part of the contract.
Grant (Rev.11/OS)
,
,
o9-i i2s
2. There must be an original fully-executed resolution from the goveming body of the applicant agency
authorizing that entity and signatory to enter into a contract with the State.
3. A Memorandum of Understanding must be submitted that is signed by all partner agencies which
delineates the role(s) of each partner in the project.
4. This is a cost reimbursement gant. Grantees will only be paid for eligible expenses that are incurred and
aze consistent with the negotiated budget. Non-profit agencies may request a one-month's cash advance at
the beainning of the grant period. Grant funds may not be used to address theft from automobiles or thefts
of other types of vehicles such as boats, snowmobiles, construction equipment or all-terrain vehicles.
2.2 Reporting Requiremenu. Grantee shall report to the State as specified in the Grant Manual of the Office of
Justice Program, which is posted online at �rw�v.oio.state.mn.us!GrantsQAC!Grant Manual.PDF and is
incorporated by reference into this grant contract.
(1) Financial Reporting. Grantee shall submit a fmancial reporting form to the State's Authorized Representative
utilizing the format identified by the State within 30 days after the end of the reporting period.
(2) Progress Reporting. Grantee shall use forms prescribed by the State to submit a quarterly progress detailing
progress achieved towazds the accomplishment of the program goals and objectives within 30 days after the
end of the reporting period.
(3) Other Requirements. Grantee shall submit such other reports and attend meetings and training as State shall
reasonably request.
(4) Evaluation. State shall have the authority, during the course of this grant period, to conduct an evaluation of
the performance of the Grantee.
(5) Requirement Changes. State may modify or change all reporting forms at their discretion during the grant
period.
(6) Special Requirements. The State reserves the right to include in the grant, at any time during the term of the
grant, special administrative requirements deemed necessary to assure the Grantee's successful implementation
of the program. The State will notify the Grantee in writing of any special administrative requirements.
3 Time
The Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this grant contract. In the performance of this
grant contract, time is of the essence.
4 Consideration and Payment
41 Consideration. The State will pay for all services performed by the Grantee under this grant contract as follows:
(1) Compensation. The Grantee will be reimbursed an amount not to exceed $242,896.00, according to the
breakdown of costs contained in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated into this grant contract. The
Grantee will submit any revisions to Elchibit A as described in Section 4.2 (2) of this grant contract and the
revised budget must be approved by the State's Authorized Representative before any expenditures may be
made based on the revised budget.
(2) Travel Expenses. Reimbursement for travel and subsistence expenses actually and necessarily incurred by the
Grantee as a result of this grant contract will be paid in the same manner and in no greater amount than
provided in the current "Commissioner's Plan" promulgated by the commissioner of Employee Relations
which is incorporated into this Grant Contract by reference. The Grantee will not be reimbursed for travel and
subsistence expenses incurred outside Minnesota unless it has received the State's prior written approval for
out of state travel. Minnesota will be considered the home state for determining whether travel is out of state.
Gran[ (Rev.lt/08)
09-1128
(3) Total Obligation. The total obligation of the State for all compensation and reimbursements to the Grantee
under this grant contract will not exceed $242.896.00.
$121,448.00 is available from July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010. Funds not expended by the Grantee for
this program through June 3Q 2010 will be available to the Grantee until June 30, 2011.
$121,448.00 is availabte from July l, 2010 tluough 7une 30, 2011.
4.2. Payment
(1) Invoices. The State will promptly pay the Grantee after the Grantee presents an itemized invoice for the
services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. Invoices
must be subanitted timely and according to the following schedule:
Itemized invoices will be filed in arrears at least quarterly, but not more often than monthly, and within 30
days of the period covered by the invoice for services satisfactorily performed.
The fmal invoice pertaining to each state fiscal year of this grant conVact must be received by July 31 of
that calendar yeaz. Reimbursements from the next state fiscal year(s) may commence on or after July 1 of
that calendaz year. The fmal invoice must be received no later than 30 days after the Expiration date of
this grant contract.
Expendihues for each state fiscal year of this grant contract must be for services performed within the
applicable state fiscal yeaz. Every state fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30.
(2) Federal funds. (Where applicable, if blank this section does not apply) Payments under this grant contract
will be made from federal funds obtained by the State through Title CFDA number of the
Act of . The Grantee is responsible for compliance with all federal requirements imposed
on these funds and accepts full fmancial responsibility for any requuements imposed by the Grantee's failure
to comply with federal requirements.
Conditious of Payment
All services provided by the Grantee under this grant contract must be performed to the States satisfaction, as
determined at the sole discretion of the State's Authorized RepresentaUve and in accordance with all applicable
federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. The Grantee will not receive payment for work
found by the State to be unsatisfactory or perfozmed in violation of federal, state, or local law.
Authorized Representative
The State's Authorized Representative is Martin Aarris, Grant Manager, 85-7`" Place E, St. Paul, MN 55101, 651-
282-4307, or his/her successor, and has the responsibility to monitor the Grantee's performance and the authority
to accept the services provided under this grant contract. If the services are satisfactory, the State's Authorized
Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment.
The Czrantee's Authorized Representative is Kenneth Reed, Saint Paul Police Department, 367 Grove Street, Saint
Paul, Minnesota 55101, (651-266-5663). If the Grantee's Authorized Representative changes at any time during
this grant contract, the Grantee must immediately notify the State.
Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Grant contract Complete
7.1 AssignmenL The Grantee may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this grant contract
without the prior consent of the State and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by
the same parties who executed and approved this grant contract, or their successors in office.
7.2 Amendments. Any amendment to this grant contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it has
been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original grant contract, or
their successors in office.
Grant (Rev.11/08)
.. . o�-� � �zs
7.3 Waiven If the State fails to enforce any provision of this grant contract, that failure does �9t $✓h�it& the
provision or its right to enforce it.
7.4 Grant Contract Complete. This grant contract contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and
the Grantee. No other understanding regarding this grant contract, whether written or oral, may be used to
bind either party.
S Liability
The Grantee must indemnify, save, and hold the State, its agents, and employees harmless from any claims or
causes of action, including attomey's fees incurred by the State, azising from the performance of this grant contract
by the Grantee or the Grantee's agents or employees. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies
the Grantee may have for the State's failure to fulfill its obligations under this grant contract.
9 State Audits
Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, the Grantee's books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and
practices relevant to this gant contract are subject to examination by the State and(or the State Auditox or
Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six yeazs from the end of this grant contract.
10 Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property
10.1. GovernmentData Pracuces. The Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data
Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this grant contract, and
as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Grantee
under this grant contract. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to
in this clause by either the Grantee or the State.
If the Grantee receives a request to release the data referred to in Uais Clause, the Grantee must immediately
notify the State. The State will give the Grantee instructions concerning the release of the data to the
requesting party before the data is released.
11 Workers' Compensation
The Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. § 176181, subd. 2, pertaining to workers'
compensation insurance coverage. The Grantee's employees and agents will not be considered State employees.
Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any
claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no
way the State's obligation or responsibility.
12 Publicity and Endorsement
12.1 Publieity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of this grant contract must identify the State as the
sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State's Authorized
Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press
releases, research, reports, signs, and similaz public notices prepazed by or for the Grantee individually or
jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided
resulting from this grant contract.
12.2 Endorsement. The Grantee must not claim that the State endorses its products or services.
13 Goveming Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue
Minnesota law, without regazd to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this grant contract. Venue for all legal
proceedings out of this gant contract, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent
jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota.
14 Termination
The State may cancel this grant contract at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days' written notice to the
Grantee. Upon termination, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services
satisfactorily performed.
Grant (Rev. I1/08)
[II'���3
15 Data Disclosure
Under Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, Subd. 3, and other applicable law, the Grantee consents to disclosure of its social
security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, akeady
provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state
obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state ta7c laws which
could result in action requiring the Grantee to file state tax rehuns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any.
1. STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION
lndividua! cerHfies that junds have b¢e bered as
reguired by Minn Smt. "{ 6A.15 16C.05.
Signed:
Date:
CFMS Grant contract No.
2. GRANTEE
The Grantee certifi �at the appropri, e pers (s)
have executed th t contract on b alf of the ntee as
required by appHcable acticles, byla s, resolution or ordinances.
By:
\
Title: Chief of Polic�
Date.
B
Title: Citv Attornev
Date:
By:
Title: Director. Financial Services
Date:
i
By: /
Title: Mavor /
Date:
By:
Title: Director Auman Ri hts E u
Date:
Distlibution.
Agency
Grantee
State's Authorized Represeniative - Photo Copy
Grant (Rev. 1 U08) S
� - r��-�r ���
09-1128
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Office of Justice Programs
Request for Proposals
AUTO THEFT PREVENTION PROGRAM GRANTS
Due May 15, 2009
PURPOSE
The Auto Theft Prevention Program is designed to reduce motor vehicle theft and its consequences
in the State of Minnesota by funding programs that aid in the reduction of automobile thefts, increase
education and awareness of the pubiic, respond to automobile theft incidents, and prosecute
offenders.
APPLICATION DEADLINE
Applications must be postmarked no later than Friday, May 15, 2009. Delivered appiications must be
received by 4:30 P.M. the same day. Mail or deliver applications to:
O�ce of Justice Programs
Justice and Community Grants Section
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 2300
Saint Paul, MN 55101-2139
Faxed or late applications will not be accepted.
ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS
State and local law enforcement agencies, county attorney's offices, the judiciary, community-based
organizations and business organizations.
FUNDS AVAILABLE
Approximately $3.5 Million in funding is available.
Grants will be awarded for two years: July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2011.
Grant size will range from $5,000 -$300,000.
No matching fund requirement.
SOURCE OF FUNDS AND LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY
M.S. 656.84
GRANT GOAL
Proposals must be based on the prevention of auto theft.
PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
To be considered for funding, a proposed grant project must have measurable goals that support one
or more of the following outcomes:
Reduce the incidence of automobile theft.
Support protracted or complex investigations or programs that target repeat offenders.
Improve the techniques or expand the resources of existing auto theft prevention
investigation, apprehension, or prosecution activities.
09-ll 28
• Support multi-jurisdictional projects combining the resources of different agencies in a task
force approach to prevent, investigate, and prosecute auto theft.
� Identify and apprehend organized auto theft rings.
■ Increase the availability of education and training programs to develop the expertise of auto
theft investigators, the judiciary, prosecutors, and driver and vehicle services exam inspections
staff.
� Make available training and public education programs on a statewide or local level.
• increase public awareness of the common methods of automobile thefts, the automobile
models most likely to be stolen, and the times and locations automobile thefts are most likely to
occur.
• Increase the availability of specialized equipment including, but not limited to: locks, alarms,
tracking/surveillance devices, and specialty tools intended to prevent to deter auto thefts.
NOTE: Grant funds mav not be used to address theft from automobiles or thefts of other
tvpes of vehicles such as boats, snowmobiles, construction eauipment or all-terrain vehicles.
Priority may be given to grant applications that 1) establish or enhance a coliaborative effort between
two or more agencies, 2) include counties or regions with the greatest rates of automobile theft, 3)
employ proven or promising strategies that reduce the incidence of automobile theft, or 4) address
automobile theft that is perpetrated as part of a criminal enterprise.
APPLICATION CONTENT
The application will consist of the following four components:
1. Project Information Sheet (Form 1)
This form details contact information for the applicant agency should the program receive
funding. Designate an authorized representative whose name could appear as a contact person
in the body of the grant contract (this person does not need to have signatory authority); the
person who is the program contact for the grant, the fiscal contact for the grant, and a contract
mailing contact. Include your agency's federal and state ID numbers, and whether the proposed
program is new or existing.
2. Narrative
Applicants will address the following in a document using 12 point font size. (2-4 pages):
A. Project Overview (20 points)
• Provide a brief description of the project to be implemented. How does this project relate to
your needs statement and why do you think it will lead to the expected results? Describe
the rotes that each of the collaborative partners wili play (if applicable).
B. Needs AssessmenUPlanning Process (30 points)
Describe the planning process used to develop this initiative, including an analysis of the
• current response to the probiem (what is working, what is not working, identify gaps, etc)
• Describe the service area to be served by the project
• What is the population of the service area?
■ What was the number of reported auto thefts in the service area in 2006?
• Auto thefts per capita in the service area calculated from the numbers above.
■ If your auto theft prevention program is a collaborative effort befiveen two or more
agencies; identify ali the agencies that will share grant dollars andlor participate in the
project.
• Address your need for grant funds based upon automobile theft issues and trends in your
proposed project service area.
C. Demonstrated Results (for current Auto Theft Prevention Grantees only)
Briefly detail the results you have achieved due to the activities funded as a part of your
current grant award. Support your statement with any data that you have collected. How does
your new proposed project build upon the lessons learned from your currently funded project?
3. Work Plan (Form 2) (40 points)
This form details the objectives, activities and performance measures for the two-year period.
The objectives are the short-term results of the project and are specific, measurable approaches
to achieving the goal. Strategies are the specific activities that will be undertaken to reach the
objectives. Include the frequency of activity, time frame, and person responsible for each
strategy/activity.
You will use one form for each measurable objective that will result from project activities.
Examples of ineasurable objectives include but are not limited to:
- Reduce the incidence of auto theft;
- Increase recovery rate of stolen vehicles;
- Increase the number of auto theft cases prosecuted or convicted;
- Increase public awareness of auto theft;
- Increase the number of successful auto theft case closures.
Finally, you will describe the methods you will use to measure the impact of your project. For
example, you may collect data on the number of vehicle recoveries per quarter in 2008 and
compare that with the number of recoveries from the same quarter in 2007 to measure the impact
of grant related recovery activities.
4. Budget (Form 3) (10 points)
• Budget form will be used to describe planned expenses, including explanations of how
budget amounts were determined and/or calculated.
• Submit a two-year (24 month) budget.
• Budget items need to support activities listed in the Work Plan.
� All expenses must be ifemized and directiy chargeable to the grant.
POST�AWARD REQUIREMENTS
[Il'�ii►.I:3
■ Grant contract process. After being selected for funding, grants staff will work with the
applicant to finalize the budget and work plan. The formal grant contract will then be initiated,
all signatures obtained, and fully executed. It is then a legally binding agreement.
• Conditions. All certifications governing compliance with State requirements such as worker's
compensation, data privacy, financial compliance, and affirmative action will be included as
part of the grant contract.
■ Resolution. There must be an original resolution from the governing body of the applicant
agency authorizing that entity and signatory to enter into a contract with the state. A fully
executed resolution must be submitted as part of the grant contract process. A sample
resolution is available upon request.
• Memoranda of Understanding. After being selected for funding, a Memoranda of
Understanding (MOU) must be submitted that is signed by ail partner agencies which
delineates the role(s) of each partner in the project.
■ Reporting. Grantees will be required to submit quarterly reports in a prescribed manner and
cooperate with statewide evaluation efforts.
■ Grant payments. This is a cost reimbursement grant. Grantees wili only be paid for eligible
expenses (after the grant contract is fully executed) that are incurred and are consistent with
the negotiated budget. Non-profit agencies may request a one-month's cash advance at the
beginning of the grant period.
APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS
This is a competitive application process. A review committee will read and rate applications
according to a standardized scoring system. Final decisions will be made by the Commissioner of
Commerce.
A�plications will be scored on the followinq scale:
Project Overview
Needs AssessmenUPlanning Process
Work Plan
Budget
TOTAL
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
20 points maximum
30 points maximum
40 points maximum
10 points maximum
100 points maximum
For questions regarding the application, please contact:
09-1128
'Jocelyn Van Knight at 651-201-7346 or jocelvn.vankniqht(a)state.mn.us
NOTE: Any information updates regarding this Request for Proposals wi11 be posted on the Office of
Justice Programs website at www.oiq.state.mn.us.
Right of Cancellation
The State reserves the right to cancel this solicitation if it is considered to be in its best interest. The
State reserves the right to negotiate modifications to the application or to reject any and all
applications received as a result of this Request for Proposals. The State does not intend to award
a grant contract solely on the basis of any response made to this request, or pay for information
solicited or obtained.
6�
Legal Name: Saint Paul Police Department
Address: 367 Grove Street
City21P: Saint Paui, MN 55101
2. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Name: John M. Harrington
Title: Chief of Police
Address: 367 Grove Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101
City21P:
3. OPERATING AGENCY
Name: N/A
Address:
City21P:
DIFFERENT
4.
5. PROGRAM CONTACT
Name: Kenneth Reed
Title: Commander, CAPROP
Address: 367 Grove Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101
City21P:
Name:
Title:
Address:
City21P:
Research & Grants Manager
367 Grove Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Phone: 651-266-5588
F�� 651-266-5542
�
�
Phone: 651-266-5588
Fax: 651-266-5542
E-mail: �ohn.harringtonC�ci.stpaul.mn
.us
Fax:
E-mail:
Phone: 651-266-5663
Fax: 651-266-5848
E-mail: Ken.reed@ci.stpaui.mn.us
Phone: 651-266-5507
F�� 651-266-5542
E-mail: Amy.brown@ci.stpaul.mn.0
s
7. PROJECT INFORMATION ❑ New Pro'ect ✓ Existin Pro'ect
Project Name: Project Start Date: Project End Date: Project Funds Requested
SPPD Auto Theft Project 7/1/2009 6/30/2011 $242,896.00
Service Area—City(ies) Judicial District: Match Provided:
and/or County(ies): Second Judicial District (Ramsey None
Saint Paul, Minnesota County) Minnesota Tax ID #
008025095
Federal ID #
41
I. Project Overview
1
�F PV
, g� �`�, OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
? II 11
��,,��� j" Project Information Sheet (Form 1)
09-1128
"I'his application seeks funding for the continuation and growth of an exciting auto theft prevention strategy
that the St. Paul Police Department was able to h during the last half of the previous funding cycle due to the
flexibility allowed by the Auto Theft Prevention Program grant. The investrnent of grant funds to purchase a
License Plate Rewgnition (LPR) system, in concert with our investigative strategies, coordination with the
Juvenile and Special Investigations (SITJ) units, training, and special detection/enforcemenUeducation details has
provided a substantial posirive impact on our ability to combat auto theft crimes. Saint Paul is seeing a
downward trend in motor vehicle theft.
We aze requesting funding to purchase additional mobile LPR units to provide greater coverage of the
geographic gaps, "hot-spots" that do not receive LPR coverage when the few units we have are in use elsewhere,
patrol shifts which aze not afforded the use of LPR when in use by other districts or patrol shifts, and overtime to
fund LPR details when the activities require an extension of the normal eight hour workday or have to be
scheduled outside the normal work week to accommodate the detail.
Funding is also requested, at a reduced but maintainable level, far the continuation and maintenance of
previous successful strategies funded by past Auto Theft Prevention Program grant funds which have helped the
St. Paul Police Deparhnent meet auto theft prevention and reduction objectives. These include the maintenance
and deployment of the "bait cars" (which recently resuited in the arrests of two of St. PauP s more prolific Honda
Civic thieves) and "bait bike"; training; enhanced Auto Theft, Juvenile Unit, and SIU motar vehicle theft
investigations; and communications.
We know through the use and development of previous grant-funded progam activities that support
infrastructure specific to our auto theft project is critical to meeting the objectives of our program. Without
support from our communicarions technician with the "bait car", technical support from our IS Systems
Specialist for the LPR, bookkeeping, data enhy, data analysis, accounring, etc, our objectives would not be met
without geat difficulty and without tying up the time of our three investigators keeping them away from the
critical wark the grant funds to reduce and prevent motor vehicle thefts. Along with the support of our IS
Systems specialist, we aze asking for funding to cover the monthly data access fees to sources applicable to auto
theft investigations.
The departxnenYs ability to purchase and fund these strategies on its own has suffered correspondingiy with
state and local budget cuts resulting from the economic conditions faced on the state and national level. This
reality means this grant is necessary for the department to be able to continue its auto theft reduction and
prevention efforts and the future results foretold by the exciting results of our past efforts outlined in the next
two sections.
�
09-1128
II. Needs Assessment/Planning Process
The City of St. Paul covers 56.16 square miles with a combined population of273,535 according to the 2006
population esrimate by the United States Census Bureau. In 2007, there were 2,076 vehicles stolen in the City
of St. Paul. While the final figures have not been reported, it appears there were 1,818 vehicles reported stolen
in 2008. This represents a.066 per capita auto theft rate, and a percent decrease from 2007 to 2008 of 12.4%.
The St. Paul Auto Theft Unit is staffed by three full-rime investigators who work exclusively on auto theft
related crimes. The St. Paul Juvenile Unit and SN unit also conduct auto theft-related investigations with an
offender-specific orientation: SN looks primarily at organized crime activity involving outlaw motorcycle
gangs, while the Juvenile Unit deals with youthful offenders. These three units work together focusing on crnne
activity involving stolen automobiles and its related perpetrators. Significantly, intelligence gathered by SN
investigators during auto theft-related invesrigarions often is used to prevent or solve other serious crimes.
In St. Paul, perpetrators favor particulaz makes and models of cars. The Honda Civic and Honda Accord
consistently rank on our "top 5" list, followed by the Toyota Caxmy, Acura Integra, and either the Buick Cenhuy
or the Dodge Caravan. Many of the Hondas and Acura's are stolen from parking lots such as those located at
public housing and retail outlets. Some of these are harvested of parts and left abandoned by the suspects who
operate mobile "chop shops" in vacant gazages and other secluded locations. Many of our stolen automobiles
are found abandoned in other jurisdictions, including in other states. Conversely, we aze finding many stolen
automobiles from other jurisdictions being abandoned in our city.
A growing number of our cases involve individuals taking cars from someone known to them, or an ex-
significant other. Many times upon interviewing the ofFender, we find an addicfion to methamphetamine as a
background to the theft. Even one of our more prolific auto thieves, caught in our "bait car" and admitting
responsibility for a large number ofHonda Civic thefts, confessed that "meth" was the core ofhis problem—we
recommended drug treatment as part ofhis outcome. Prosecution ofthese acquaintance-type cases is sometimes
difficult. The best outcomes can often be either catching the offender while he/she is in the car, or the quick
recovery of the car to restrict the use of the car to the offender and return it to its rightful owner.
Cold winter weather brings with it a conesponding increase of vehicles left running and unattended with the
keys in the ignition making for an easy crime of opportunity. Damage done to the vehicle is generally minimal
in these cases. As with vehicles stolen by persons known to the owner, the best outcomes are either catching the
offender while he/she is in the car, or the quick recovery of the car to restrict the use of the car to the offender
and rehun it to its rightful owner.
W e are still experiencing thefts involving low-value vehicles, or vehicles in a state of disrepair, that end up,
if found at all, at salvage operations locally or elsewhere. Thefts of Harley-Davidson and other makes of
motorcycles remains low, but every yeaz pops up as crime trend needing to be addressed. Intensive and
cooperative investigation is required to address these types of theft operarions.
09-1128
The St. Paul Police Department began implementing a License Plate Recognition (LPR) program by
purchasing and installing one (1) compiete mobile LPR unit including the associated softwaze and required
systems components. This was designed as a trial implementation to assess the efficacy of the LPR system to
meet the objecrives ofthe St. Paul Police Department and the Auto TheftPrevention program. Policy/procedure
development, installation, and training were completed and the program went "live" on June 16, 2008. 'I'he
single LPR unit was deployed to the three patrol districts based on bi-weekly and monthly auto theft trend data
analysis. Between then and September 30, 2008, even with the distraction of the Republican National
Convention, thirty-five (35) unoccupied stolen automobiles were recovered, and two more recoveries resulting in
arrests were accomplished with the assistance of that single LPR unit. In October 2008, the St. Paul Police
Department submitted a gant revision request which allowed the pwchase of two (2) additional LPR units. The
winter months saw a reduced rate of recovery, yet through April 30, 2009, the program resulted in the recovery
of sixty-nine (69) vehicles stolen in St. Paul, forty (40) vehicles stolen from other jurisdictions, six (6) arrests
involving occupied stolen vehicles, one (1) arrest for burglary, one (1) felony warrant arrest, and the recovery of
a missing juvenile.
We discovered early on the importance of having customer service assured through the purchase of the
annual maintenance and service agreements. While the LPR was stable and would work without fault for long
periods of time, because of the size of our depamnent, and the variety of hardware and software in use,
integration issues cropped up from time to time as changes made in one part of the departmenYs overall
technical system had unforeseen impacts on the LPR system. Our contractor's technical support was available
and responsive 24/7, as well as the availability of replacement parts (provided at no extra charge) when
necessary. Keeping annua] maintenance agreements in place is essential and worth the cost.
Other significant positive benefits that were not foreseen have accrued from the LPR program: 1) In October
of 2008, because the data format used by the LPR system allowed, we were able to incorporate "scofflaw"
informarion into the data-set read and processed by the LPR cameras ("scofflaw" means five or more unpaid
fickets listed to a registered motor vehicle). This has resulted in the towing of three hundred and one (301)
"scofflaws" through April 30, 2009. This represents through the recovery of unpaid fines a minimuxn amount of
$37,625.00, and is surely significantly higher although there is as of yet no concrete way to retrieve the true
amount. 2) The LPR program is maintained and managed by the Auto Theft Unit. The LPR is deployed to
qualified LPR patrol officer operators in the patrol districts based upon "hot spots" determined by crime and
geographical data. The increased contact and regular collaboration between the investigators and patrol
personnel specifically focusing on auto theft and related issues has helped increase awareness, provided for
numerous formal and informal training opportunities, and we have seen better reports and increased crime scene
processing, all of which helps make better criminal cases and increases the likelihood of securing criminal
chazges.
�
09-1128
III.
Demonstrated Results:
a.
b.
c.
Auto thefts decreased 12.4% from 12J31/07 (2,076) to 12/31/2008 (1,818).
Auto thefts decreased 31% from 1996 (2,638) to 12/31/2008 (1,818).
Number of stolen/recovered vehicles:
20071ocalllocal— 831; 2007 OOC/local - 460
20081ocaUlocal- 1,117; 2008 OOC/local - 430
d.
e.
f.
g•
h.
i.
J•
k.
1.
m.
n.
o.
Vehicle theft invesrigations assigned 7/1/07 - 3/31/09: 4,020*
Number of azrests (Adult):
■ 2007 - 303
• 2008 - 288
Number of arrests 7/1/07 - 3/31/09 (Juvenile): 132
Number of cases charged 7/1/07 - 3/31/09 (Adult): 330
Number of cases referred 7/1/07 - 3/31/09 (Juvenile): 132
`Bait Car" deployments - 65
"Bait Caz" activations - 10
"Bait Caz" arrests - 3
LPR recovered sixty-nine (69) vehicles stolen in St. Paul (6/16/08 — 4/30/09).
LPR recovered forty (40) vehicles stolen from other jurisdicrions (6/16/08 — 4/30/09).
LPR resulted in six (6) arrests involving occupied stolen vehicles (6/16/08 — 4/30/09).
LPR resulted in one (1) arrest for burglary, the recovery of a missing juvenile, and a felony
warrant arrest (6/16/08 — 4/30/09).
p. LPR resulted in towing of three hundred and one (301) "scofflaws" (6/16/08 — 4/30/09).
q. Investigation outside the normal hours of business resulted in Sergeant Mueller arresring and
charging Justin Bye - one of our tow truck-using thieves. Found guilty by jury 4/24/2009.
r. Investigation outside the normal hours of business resulted in Sergeant Reed and Gang Unit
Sergeant Straka working a possible chop shop on the city's East Side. They recovered a number
of stolen cars and stolen parts from gang-related auto thieves.
s. Investigative effort outside the normal hours of business enabled SN and Auto Theft
investigators to cover two locally-held motorcycle shows and recover a number of stolen parts,
secure valuable intelligence information, and make good contacts.
t. Personnel overtime funds allowed Auto Theft Unit investigators to more thoroughly prepare
cases slated for trial while ensuring that the investigators day-to-day obligations were not in any
way neglected. Review of interview transcripts, photo development and computerized map
making were typical prosecutor requests of investigators.
u. Personnel overtime funds allowed invesrigators the opportunity to more fully investigate
numerous in-custody cases so that these same cases could be presented to prosecutors for
charging considerafion while the suspects remained in custody.
v. Inteiligence gathered from a suspect arrested in a bait car detail outside the normal hours of
business led to the identification of numerous other auto theft suspects, several of whom later
admitted to some of their crimes both in St. Paul and other jurisdictions.
w. Training funds allowed investigators to attend the 2007 IAATI training conference in Phoenix,
Arizona; and the annual AVCAM conferences in Minnesota.
*(cases assigned minus cases closed — no invesfigator)
0�-��?�
. ;:.; ;,,; w
,'""`., � Y O
2�.,-. ?'� ' "6 vi f.'
�� 'O 'O 'O � O � O
:'^ "� � N N �' � T d c�G
_�:: w . � L: R�. R�. �,. fl, y s,
, �, �! :_� C Q C c3. � .+ a� •O
. _ y a7 N "r". � ". . � o � a>
y y
o �� CG � `.G 3'�° � ���.�c _�
> � �, fse Q Q Q :�� O ,.�'�, o °� � �
v o �: U U U '� O �'� o �
;�_ .� Oi"'- . . � ' � � o w � .�
G .--i N M
C. O
'RS. - � "' v � s�r �+'" s� �
0 .�I y Y �i'� y N� 0
� .. � � ' � � y � � '�n � � � � � . � � � � � �
�... � �: .�C � W � Y W Ll t. , y Y �y y
N � .,
„ ' .'�.+ � .',: C� y � ,� p ' � N � ..s"' X '� J . '�. U 'O O ca4 '�"' Q
�: � f,7y ' � Y'�' O W Q m� O W "�' . F�. y�r' N..�'.
� � � " � � .'�� ° •° .� � '� � ;y � � � � � c�c
- ��., ` j � � :- � O''� o � ° O �'b o �. � ^ � � .° a.
� .. � 2' : � _ ,Ny y � � .�r CC Y � � xi � W1 � 1,q y
� ." ' aN �: a Q aIN �� � �" � � �.� °' �
`r'�` ! p 4 . �--� �--� � "O N M '. � 'O ,+'�3 W` ❑ p '�' cC � N
7" j ° � N� y �'A '3 '� 'O
Q ' y ., �`�U' O� Q O o" C7
� � � � , T i � y 3 � � � �
- ",� . N `+r ` � cd � -'`�QS �r w . � bA ."-� O �
'O �
� oq rtm' ' '� a�i �- ��� a�i >' y 3�' U
� � : � � � a � > v �
��;,�; �i � ; a .� .ti � �p��. E � � 3 0 �a
. ° �, aj o �
�; C�tl �+ � C 4 T+�' � N
:� �: y � a; cd V cC � ��ki�i � c� +�' y s�.
%R � . V tf � � � � � �: � � y .H � � �ti
'' �� °� `� �; c � i `� '� U v ��'� �`� a� y t° v
�� ^ � a�r : � °: a O 'b �'"`"' � �s c�i � o �° �
��s. ,� y � 1 O� � ���. � p.� p a., a� a�
w,-'� � �T'4 ` .-� 'Y N cn Q �`�; H Q U cG t�-� 'y �
. n �. '-.. � ,
��s . y �'FS"4 .. � �"::
. ;� � � � � y =': ,.� � �'� .t
�"- .. a vi +� � f.' �cC � �rv �"8 ��-' ^ r �4
V Y w°`2..c':�- N O�
��26_. V ��v�. N Y GJ p y � ro t 7� py I`2in
a�t7� � �� � O �'O N � U a �n - ',�3`��� O O x � ��
� � ;:� � N � y ..f ; � � 0.� � � S� � N � . �+ �'"' �.�. y�,� "���. �
��"��'°'�"`6 � ,".�=''r�`, b�0 F-1 �^ A, ��j rn O "�vxr�,
t; 0 y -��'�'v � 0 pq � Y � p C,�� �r . y�-. ��-'�'N
�...� O ��*�r� �� �C t � k� vi cC i�� � O r� �
�r��y A�'' �4 . '� N 'C y . ¢� �. '
-�' t CJ 7�k �� m 7J �" �'" W N.:." .�-� N " ��.�, -;} q,
� y .� . �� . C'i V i-i ir C �Y � '�O J � 3 � �O �y S r �i
t � � 'SSf � ;� U � `+�+ � N .� � x 4J � � i� 0 � sew. .,
_ v cC a U� a+
i� N
�� �: � � �x � � � � � � rM � x � � ����� � O �����
'1
Q (� Yl LI V � [�`�.
�� o o ��� ° � A p�, a� � �.°� 3 � ' `'���� ° � `� �"
#' o « � o v, � on �'��, " :���kz
"'§W ty i� .."'n �'' "y'. V1 LL a N 4J . �� C '� .] � y "� �u:
�s N N 'C ;�CS.r d m �.
�' ��:. � U c� �� � £i' �. V• t�3 � � tFK ' �7 y � �-�'
x ��. � � • c 3 v-o w y �� a ��
"� �, � '� �-`� �' °' °' ' � .y y � v :o �.� � � ��
� y ,,�„ -o � > �,
� ' c i .�� `�` -o � w °, .n e�n.� � 3 � o � � a��i �� �;�,
;��: y V p P y �� � v � O� Q cC � c�0 x F+ '� '� f, " bD �'g.,
�� , y �y � �y � ' '� '.s N t� o i.: i'. 'C �"��ar° •� s`�, ����,
° � . c�a �.�. � "��,"' , �Q, w Q+ �" � A. � •s.�. � � s�. �e '. c �n a � a `'q;,
« �.. r r/- �� �'s ..+:
L .. �'a U C O r � "� �,� � m N� 3 ��-+ 4J Ir '� 4 � V.G' ""a #Di`'��
-w " � F Si c0 � w' GJ � c�C O � c�C , ..�.� y F'^'�E'"•
"'.e &� � �` � � .aF ,S7 � N c0 � � ',L7 ,y" �� Q a�srrae� .
�k, i� t�se,� � a "�'' 'y P. � °�' � � a �Q � � � O �-
�; � ;at�- � a.� ... U a o - � a o a. O � � � �; �;
� � "� � ��' � _ �
��� �
�..w: + ��, �� •3 � a
� F
; �� r, N t� .°�� � y � . �yw,
� . C$t� "-�„� � ' .�7 q � a
�;, r. F"� c� 5 '','
_ y "i�i �"*{,,,_: �.
0
�� \ \?$
�; � ._ �
� v � � � y ^ � y c� y y �. � ° �
�... ❑... a...�, � o .�
�� �.� C7 �� C7 a�i .� C7 a�i a�j a�i a y r�n "w � �
_ _ �p,� ;v, s7 y
- :" H O ``�f s�' .C`�. 7 �" L`�. 7 L'"' -N. � '� R: � 'z+ .� i" •r. �
A v, R�, � Q.�'.. � Q."�.. � Q�(� Q.�'i a1 �y d��U � y r� .0 v�i .,.,
d a�i"�� Q 00 �� 00 �'� �� ca bA � m bA A� S�_ � L �
>� y a' U v1 � �, c/� y �, � y>, v� �>, v� U� '" o � .,
°: °' �� � o ti � oti � p � p . v G;; � � .c
-.1'i� � - .-. R�. 0.. ... Ri F.� -� -N. G. N R= 0.. M C Z+ '6 ; O� N
� � �
W a" W m h � . �
' � Y � y � y � �: �=' O � O � �
U
. 'C - a�_.. � h"A �D � � bD a0 :m; � ^O ¢ Q �
" .�` ' � W W w W W w ..m.o.�' C�'. y P-i r-.
� �� � p p ;�., .� bA Q
. -.'d : , �: ' � c�J O p O C. G .f. 'J " Q +�.' W � L�
� FT�., O� � . O O O "J �=� N� P-�. 0..
G � G p� • CC �C CG �O (� CG � a�.+ U � Y
�i s.. s.� s+ s � ty y :' s. �
�i�.i .� A,� N y�'i D R '� R R "� S"' ��r O N� P-i � cC
�: �'_ ��. ,� Ati � Q Q Q Q Q Q �+' � bA r. � Pr
s, � � cC V1 . �
� � n � �
- � � :, .� � .� � � b N M 7 ^�, En' U � � � s:
tp" �. ' 'w'G ' 3'; '-�" N � � b
� �� a �+' ` ,� '�. A � �. O �
°' ar�r -. "� � m m Q m m rn - m
�� � � :, � ca o �a o c� c ro ca �d � a'"i � � � �
� ar� v � o � � . ,�, o � .o � �� o. � � o � �
4., � -o '� 'b '� c� � -o '� � � m p., U � o
�k `� �,�� �p �,a �a ��� o �` 6 "'� -o i�
' T ' �' `' a � , ' o ?i r�i, s�•�• f�i, �" v � i 7' r�i, T ,x �° '-. � �" �° �° � � '�cC
� � F � �. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
N �7 o� Y Y�- " c�d y � o s �-�+" � a� w "; >, -cj ,��.. %Z o
�. a. ti� . � 0- •�+ 0 7, .-� j, .b ��, . j, .� C. 3� a Y a.
y,i r t'� t; -"^� n '� Q y .O �^3 p y O b� -�' �. . ..C' 1 GJ ..4'
N
o���": E�' a� �-c�aa��c W�.� z '�a'', q o ��'�
fr. ,��,�.r ' �,, v, v v, a� v, a� m a� Q. � y
z� cv ..fl ca � ti ca N�ci c� aJ R� . V P. `� `� �r �
� "�S , `W� : r. .-. U Q^- U Q^• U r.' N U Q M V m V] � �G � ^� � C7
� � Y�� I F �i e.� �k1FA
" �j , 3 � -0 3 `� � . ������
a ��� .� , ,= r " � � ��
P.� i'�a: .w`� ��. � 'V N m vi o `�? - C � ;��
r P {� 0 � � b � � `4�$j f 4 : � Sz ���
!� �,. � W v� O'C �' N v. c�d .�' ��'� O Y
�;
� ��E � � `� � � o �°' y N � o � � � � >, �-�'��: a��i ���� e
� �� '� a � �f � O '�. � � V R$ f� � � -�1'� �i � 2 Y k �y .,i.x�'�� x
� o .a -0 3 ro � � � � ,� , �.� i �� �_� � �
� w �S o '� .� � � o co � '� 'c c'"i s�. �o y •� fi��te ,� -�, �^�,�,�
� . � .� � ` o s. a� � " ° 3 '� a �' .° v .y y �,� �: y �x��� �
� d �, ° ^fl o ou � � •.-, c° p b � .d �,- o � � � � ��
�� � � t �� � ������ �"°�° a'� Y 3 ���ya� � ��;�x�
vi J v � � s. ca � � � �� �.s
. .�C "�` t-� r; > >.. 7 � O .n `n �' � cC � � `C� t 7 "".�� w
u � G vi �' O N� y��� N.y c�C �,� p� y T � ` O s �� "w"v � nf.
,��" �'�. Q' +zy-`i� i, Or m s. 4) m.� p p .t," s. F'. U �`�d � �Y; .�,�.'
�� � �', y ��t�. ° ° a. 3 3 o a� � '� � � � .� °�' o »�� � o ' ���'z;:
� a� ,� "� °�° a � � o ��'� 3 •y 'y � � N � � , �t-��` � ���Sm��:
��- � ,`'�''�. .q '� a :�' o � o � � � a � c��o c�d � � ,*'� � '�'� `�;;
�'° � ,�,`�,'c�,; w " co •� >,.� 3 � ° w "" � � °n `� � �-��
Y -� O �r �
�a.�`! �. •--• J7 ctl �-, .'O p p9 "-' A " d� � .� �a i
��� � ,�� ' � � � 'O ?t cd q � y , � � � 'C� � �� 'Y ��+���
i „� � � ti "65 � � y' , y f"' �L "' cJ af ^ O y �,� x ai W "P �Vi -� ' C .� , ��,,�''°'"
' `` �"� ; � p ^ O O o, v, �" a3 c� U p ; � �. �?p. e .
�r � ��r� n�� .� � �m � 3 � � a i a �- � ~ � �,-„ o �
� �r;� ,n v� ou � � .o o a. � o a� � o p �„ • • �. ��
,ej �. '� q � ' .�i C�$ y Y Xi ti � Y. V �'"� c`5at'
4 � h: � ,�, � h � y 3 .N cC cC y " N � T " �" �' �° , '� � �..� m� `�` _
r ;�., Ri �' �; N � � ,� � ¢, � � � � y � O r0 ^y ,� � ar �,'�'�
��M1 � r
`� i �t �Y^ T!�.� •i� � "�' N� 7� O O U y O O � p Yy�" cd .� ��
� w�'„i .`7 ti �'O .'� �U .� .� 3 U .� .� � Q cd C..) �',i�.r � � �' .,.>,
� �i �?. y �E � o �N ..
,� i� � � � -3 Y a ' �°
�..
�' `� � .-� c�i ri V '�s _ .... � V -�� . . �.�'
� '`�•�' �. � ��, •� N
�' ��� N �.ic �. hy'K_ F"' '.�7-
.... � _: ' .., _. ..... xn?.. _'tti@' � W
�
��'
• � � -� b �
;�:. � � w
� � o
w_� � � � � � � � � �
m
a� a� v °' ?,. a� �'n
_ . ' �y ;II. � � � � � _.: . - � v�, a�i a�
m
i� �` � � N � ,'�':-�_ m V Y
a ° �.. � � `.G 3 . � � a� �,., ...
a� 0 y 0.1 C0. � � �--. .� w L� o '�
r. a� o �a c .'�
> _ � � 0.�r. �'n �'n �1 C� , _ " �. o
.� a� zn rn U U �. . y��'�, �
� ' pK - � °' ` o � � � ,�
°� '.
� c�i ri v A ; � � � _o ,b F.
"��� _ �+ «+ ^i � `' 7 � C.' U N �
�m_., : ; �' �' �J ,; - � o �'..i d .�' R
?C..z ' - � � � � r o w o p �
, � : ; -,'�,�,� �� �A �0 � .� a�'i-; .:_. ° N O °� � •� G�
, N 01 � o O c3 , v � N Ri .� O
°�+ ` N b '� - y". q � V 01 � y.i � OJ L+ C"
���r.; F! (�:.: O O a'd � �,—. t% .� O � p...�. F �
N ctl
'a�, ; �, �t i: � N '� � � � ts ° � a v •ti a�
r.
: �"= P ^' � a m a, y � N �.'' � .ti � �o � �;
;� �_ � � �` Ca L� .-� � � t� o � . ;, �o � � � -� �
,,a.., � ,� c�i ri c� � V � �. �. ° m '"
s. ':, a� �,� � .� ry � �. m
� _. � �.�.r�F� °' � � 4 ' � �
0
�.°'; � '� ' t�:,��,; � i •� � � �
� � c�C c�C � O� V f� cd �
-1+
y� Q U � O
'.. � y C� G� � L} s. 'O
� � �r-+ � ` � � � � u � � � � � �
�'-�.} "� � +�. ��i `C n 'O v, ,� � � a� L1
=4.� � 'p C �m 'f" �m � �'�r�' �.�j N � 'C� ro 7 ❑ J
'�?Q v r�i� .''� a:H cef � cC Rf U .-y rr'*�'`r�'° t ' . .' P V c C p q �
Lz ' O ""s� � A S) A� �:.SS= � 4+ CCi
�L�1 Ic, � � � b�A .�y � b�D � � ^� N �,'`�'�� V i-I � VJ VJ ,
yi �; O ^� ''. N• a> y . v, "�" ^,� `�'� � N aS y
�"Ci .. .+ O . O v, N "d '� �� , `� ."� .� ]„" v,
� y � ,� � °° o � °° V °" � ` ��i�.yc. m c '�' � v, �
��a" �.." "r'�. � ,-. O s�, N O� M C' r �',3� E"� E L,�" A U �i
'%a�t� � W r . , t s
�, y
��- naa t�. �,�A,"'... � bU � �ay�,:. .� t�.�d��
� y � V] .� -fi eLd' ' � � !�$`��.;
k''�` .. i�E. Vl . "" 3 i� � bA W �J"a'°'� N O �'�'�£'a�
=��' v �£ � � O w � d '-� � �r py( ' ! ' �� �''� y ��„ � y+� .'�
.. � .�.a ����. � w U U 4J CJ ��„ � Q �7.�3�T�, � � � � 5.
w �v
c,�: N t q3 i C� yr d
�' a�� } Y � �:' i 'L U V � N W m C� U A � �k 'O i'�' t `r-� ",
"5 e T .� ; +' V 'L�, '� C (: '� y � ,� dC � r'3 .t: �t`;a�k
o � �. '� a� m o � o o ca w � � '` o ° � , ��;!
� � CO cC N U . � �,��.�C.
; � 4 ��'e `, N � `� � � U � � �' bA y�..�..d '� r�ii
� O .-. a) m 't�"� a ,;
' � F'e ���� i• � � � Q N i � � td � L1" � � t O � ks � ; � :
�� ' ��. O - y � Q . � ^O O �i O � � � 'N, � a�„ �.
�t,�-`�.''. �" � y,� N.��., � Q O N O��, N p � y� ��vl
+,��y o.,w W ?k �� oi N cC � � � 0.i Q" •�,;, � �"a..�` j � ? ,�
�;q µ � .. , y �,�, � � °' � � +- a � v � ��";� ¢' .� �``
x F-r ^� yly .:. O bD � �. b�q � y 'd � a w� s :
'+tG"'� .� � r�Y� "�" (n .� 'O ,� bq O � "O .� �a-�e'�� 'O � +� ��
tE+ e a• �. m . . s, �,' '� .r�. .... �,�".. a> U .�'s�7
�� � a' a . v � ° m � ,o . o ���° � s�.�
, _"�'' ° c � -o o .. � ca �a o ai � r�� , a� a�'i ��,��
� ,�; `a �'"�' °� a � i a � i b� v � o� o ca �"'. a c�'o ��
1 i � � Z�J: ��+ � �y � ' . �}{'�� Y� � O ��� 34 (� �a
�� A 1�� -fi � V � VI Q W 1..� '� V � 3 .. � O ��i;..:
� ° £3 " "� a� .� '� � � c o p.' � y'� � m m `�.
��¢ f� �,c`",S � c� o� c` P. s �� � v ��` w.o
� �i vi 6a v' � P" � � i.�., 'O � c �" .� 4 � .: T � �' '� s
� � '� ��"� y " - � ! � N �+ O � O b �' .,
��< 4� V N � � �. � Q� � Y .r�Y � � J ~ fA ' �w'�: (� � ����;
� '�^ � Y �
�� dli..� �� � �� '� .�' � U .� C�. .n L , wl fi . $_I CC f��5� �'� $ '�.���
�� ", s � � � - � o�n � o .� � � � � � ,� �� � � p�P
r „ � ,s�r�:_ C s .� s� � a o �' o � ° � > �?�=" a"i °> � *:v
a�a,� - � � C� 3 � V .�'-i .� R� R.P. v�', .�' � .� y*3 . �.' A. � """�4
��� �' . cC , .3:L
v ��'� • N M V � � �
. � :� b �"�7�` ~ .y��a'�' .� � V -
' �i M �� E cC . 'f�' �"
::a5v _.t. -r.r ,m�` "
-1 \Z�S
�t � �Z�
Form 3
�„ aF>��,�
4 =='` 9m OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
' `;� II II
� � sp ; Detailed Budget Worksheet `
'�oF��'
Organization: Saint Paul Police Deparhnent
Progam: SPPD Auto Theft Project
BudgetPeriod: from 7/i/2009 through 6/30/2011
Line Item Detail
Auto Theft Investigator OT 365 hrs x$56.89
Juvenile Unit Investigator OT 125 hrs x$56.89
SIU Investigator OT 125 hrs x$56.89
Police Officer LPR OT 365 hrs x$46.52
Accounting Tech -$66,078/yr x.07 x 2 years
IS Systems Specialist - 68,411lyr x.045 x 2 years
Office Assistant -$34,259/yr x.075 x 2 years
Communications Tech -$57,962Jyr x.0135 x 2 years
G
Funds
$20,765.00
$7,111.00
$7,111.00
$16,980.00
$9,251.00
$6,157.00
$5,139.00
$1,565.00
TOTAL
$74,079.00
0
�t-\ \2.�
2 Auto Theft Investigators: NCRC/IAATI Midwest MV Theft
conference - Chicago or TBD
Airfare 2 x $300.00 = $600.00
Ground Transport (est) 2 x $63.00 = $126.00
Hotel 2 x 3 days x$217.50 =$1,305.00
Meals $68.35 X 2 x 3=$410.10
Registration $385.00 x 2 = $770.00
3 Auto Theft investigators: 2 AVCAM conferences (local)
IAATI dues and registration, 3 investigators @$35 each (annual)
NCRC dues and registration, 3 investigators C$10.00 each
TOTAL
Grant Funds
$3,212.00
$750.00
$105.00
$30.00
��
10
c� ��Z�
TOTAL GRANT FUNDS REQUESTED $242 ,896.00
11