08-1407Council File # � � ���
Green Sheet # 3064515
RESOLUTION � �
CITY OFSAINT P,,AUL, MINNESOTA
Presented by
1 RESOLVED, that the City of Saint Paul, Police Department, is authorized to enter into the attached Joint Powers Ageement
2 wluch has an indemuification clause, with the City of Windom acting through its Police Department for participation in the
3 Intemet Crimes Against Children Task Force. A copy of said agreement is to be kept on file and on record in the Office of
4 Financial Services.
Yeas
Boshom y s
Carter ,i
Harris ,i
Stark
Thune
Adopted by Council: Date /�/v�3
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
BY� � < //f � � ��
Approved by Mayor: Date f� as aa�
sy: �� r� /? �� �
3 byl�/5`---�e�f PJ �( � fz
/
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet ��
� DepaRmentlOffice/Couneil: i Date Initiated: v � J �� "
� PD- Po1i ��P artment �; 20-NOV-0B ���: Green Sheet NO: 3064515
;, Contact Person 8 Phone: � �
. Chief John Hartinpton '
266-5588
� Assign
: Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): ! Number
Por
' Routing
I ; Doc. Type: RESOLUTION '�. Order
i
�i E-DOCUment Required: Y I
� Document Contact: Evette Srarver i
, ConWCtPhone: 26&5541
0 Rati e Department � Police Department �
1 Po&ce Deoartmeut �� PoJice Departmenf ,i �
2'City Attoroev ' i CiN Attornev
3
4
Tofal # of Signature Pages r (Clip AII Locations for Signaturej
Signatures on the attached council resolurion authorizing the City of Saint Paul, Police Departrnent, to enter into the attached Joint
Powers Agreement wtih the City of Windom, acting through its Police Department.
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R):
Planning Commission
CIB Committee
Personal ServiCe Contracts Must Answer the Following QuestiOns:
1. Has this persoNfirtn ever worked under a contract for this department?
Yes No
Civii Service Commission 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this personlfirm possess a skill not �ortnally possessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separaM sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
The City of Windom Police Department will participate in the Intemet Crimes Against Childten Task Force (ICAC) of the Saint Paul
Police Depar[ment. Authorization is needed.
Advantages If Approved:
Opportuniry to network with outside agencies to bring successful prosecutions in cluld pronography cases.
Disadvantages If Approved:
None.
��� , �������
���
� ,. �
Disadvantages If Not Approved: ���p i
Lost opportunity to use gant funds to successfully prosecute child pornography pezpetrators. � j� A1��R�EY
ToWI Amount of
Trensaction:
Funtling Source:
Financial lntormalion:
(Explain)
CostlRevenue Budgeted:
Activity Number.
November 20, 2008 1:28 PM Page 1
DK'IG�D�
Minnesota Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force
Multi-Agency Law Enforcement Agreement
This Multi-Agency Law Enforcement Agreement, and amendments and supplements
thereto, (hereinafter "AgreemenY') is between the City of Saint Paul, acting through its Police
Deparlment (('n•autee) and Citv of Windom, acting through its Police Department (444 Ninth
Street VJindom, Mn. 56101 (hereinafter "Undersigned Law Enforcement Agenc�') both which
aze empowered to enter into joint powers agreements pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.59, Subd. 10
& 12, and is further empowered to enter into this Agreement by Minn. Stat. § 626.76; and
WheTeas, the above subscribed parties have joined together in a multi-agency task force
intended to investigate and prosecute crimes committed against children and the criminal
exploitation of children that is committed and/or facilitated by or through the use of computers,
and to disrupt and dismantle arganizations engaging in such activily; and
Whereas, the undersigned agencies agree to utilize applicable state and federal laws to
prosecute criminal, civii, and forfeiture actions against identified violators, as appropriate; and
WheTeas, the Grantee is the recipient of a federal grant (attached to this Agreement as E�ibit
A) disbursed by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention ("OJJDP") in
Washington, D.C. to assist law enforcement in investigating and combating the exploitation of
children which occurs through the use of computers by providing funding for equipment,
training, and expenses, including travel and overtime funding, which aze incurred by law
enforcement as a result of such investigations; and
Whereas, the OJJDP Internet Crimes Against Children ("ICAC") Grant Manager has been
established representing each of the existing ICAC Task Forces to oversee the operation of the
grant and sub-grant recipients.
Now Therefore, the parties agree as follows:
The Undersigned Law Enfarcement Agency approves, authorizes, and enters into
this Memorandum of Understanding with the putpose of implementing a three-
pronged approach to combat Internet Crimes Against Children: prevention,
education and enforcement; and
The Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency shall adhere to the OJJDP
ICAC Task Force Program Standards (attached to this Agreement as E�ibit
B), in addition to state federal laws, when conducting undercover operations
relative to ICAC; and
6g-l�{a�
2. All officers contributed by the Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency to
the Minnesota ICAC Task Force shall be licensed peace officers or found by
the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training to have
comparable qualifications; and
3. When a contributed officer of the Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency
acts on the behalf of the Minnesota ICAC task Force within the scope of
this Agreement, the officer's actions are within the officer's line of duty and
course of employment to the same extent as if the officer had acted on
behalf of the officer's employing Agency; and
4. The Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency shall indemnify, save and hold
harmless the Grantee, its representatives and employees from any and all
claims or causes of action, including all reasonable attorney's fees incurred
by the Grantee, arising from the performance of this Agreement by the
Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency's officer/s/; and
5. All members of the Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency shall continue
to be employed by the same Law Enforcement Agency employer which they
were employed before joining the Minnesota ICAC Task Farce and all
services, duties, acts or omissions performed by the member will be within
the course and duty of that employment, and therefore, are covered by the
Workers Compensation programs of that employer; will be paid by that
employer and entitled to that employer fringe benefits; and
6. The Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency shall submit all requests for
undercover ICAC related operations in writing to the Commander of the
Minnesota ICAC Task Force for presentation to the OJJDP ICAC Task
Force Board of Directors; and
7. The Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency must first submit a written
request for funds and receive approval for the funds from the Grantee to
receive any funds from the Grantee; and
8. The Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency must supply original receipts to
be reimbursed on pre-approved requests; and
2
68-/C/�7
9. The Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency shall maintain accurate records
pertaining to prevention, education, and enforcement activities, to be
collected and forwarded monthly to the Minnesota ICAC Task Force
Commander or his designee for statistical reporting purposes; and
10. T`he Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency shall participate fully in any
audits required by the OJJDP; and
11. The Undersigned Law Enfarcement Agency shall make a reasonable good
faith attempt to be represented at any scheduled regional meetings in order
to share information and resources amongst the multiple entities; and
12. The Undersigned Law Enfarcement Agency shall be solely responsible for
forwarding information relative to investigative targets and victims, to the
ICAC data system pursuant to the OJJDP guidelines; and
13. The Undersigned Law Enforcement Agency shall provide the Minnesota
ICAC Task Farce Commander in a timely manner all investigative
equipment acquired through grant funding as a result of this Agreement in
the event that: future federal funding is no longer available, the Agency
decides to dissoive its binding relationship with the Minnesota ICAC Task
Force and the Saint Paul Police Department, or the Agency breaches the
Agreement.
bg �1�4�
Terms of this agreement:
This ag�eement shall be effective upon signatures. Nothing in this agreement shall otherwise
limit the jurisdicfion, powers, and responsibilities normally possessed by an employee as a
member of the Agency.
John M. Harrington,
Director of Office of Financial
Police Department
The Windom Police Department certifies that the appro
has executed the Aereement on behalf of the
0
`�' �
s. / f �
d t lt VIK��,/ i�
Deparhnent o£ Justice �� � / �� �
� A ,,, ' Office of Iusece Pro�3'dlns
Office of the Assistan[ Attomey Genera] Woslwgwq D.G 2053]
May 2, 2006 �
ChiefJohn Hanington
City of Sain[ Paul
IS West Kellogg Boulevud
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Deaz Chief Hazringon:
On behaff of Attomey General Alberto Gonzales, rt �s my pleasure [o mform you tha[ the Office of Jus[ice Progams has
approved your apptication for funding under Ihe In[emet Crimes Agams[ Children Task Force Program m the amount of
$500,0p0 foc CiCy of Saint Paul.
Enclosed you witl find [he Grant Awazd and Special CoMiuons documenu. This award is subjut to all admmis[ra4ve and
financial requiremwis, including the hmely submiss�on of all financial and programmallc reports, resoluuon of all m[enm
audit Fndings, and the main[enance of a minimum level of cuh-on-hand. Should yov no[ adhere [o these requirements, you
wi11 be in v�olation of the [em�.s of tk�is agreemen[ and [he awazd will be subject to [ermina[ron for cause or other admimstrative
action u appropria[e.
If you have questions regazdmg this award, please contact
Program Quesfions, Christopher Holloway, Progam Manager at (202) 3�5-9838�, and
Finanaal QuesUOns, the Office of (he Comptroller, Customer Service Center (CSC) a[
(800) 458-0786, or you may con[act the CSC ai ask.oc@usdoj.gov.
CongaNla6ons, and we look forward to working witk� you.
Sincerely,
.��, � ����
Regina B. Schofield
Assistant Attomey General
Enclosures
bg-l��
� �
�
May 2, 2006
Chief John Hazrington
City of Saint Paul
1S West Kellogg Boulevazd
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Deparhnent of Jus[ice
Office of Justice Programs
Office for Civil Rights
Wns)wgmnD.0 20531
Deaz Chief Hunng[on:
Congtamlations on your recent awazd. In estabhshing financtal assistance progruns, Congress linked the receipt of
Federal funding m compliance with Federal civii nghts laws. The Office for Civil R�ghts (OCR), Office of Justice
Programs (O7P), U.S. Department of Justice is responsible for ensunng that recipienu of financ�al aid from OJP,
its componen[ offices and bureaus, the Office on Violence Agains[ W omen (O V W), and the O�Ce of Commumty
Oriented Policir,g Services (COPS) comply wi[h applicable Federal civi] nghts stam[es and regulations. We a[
OCR aze ava�lable [o help you and your organzation mee[ the civil rights requvemen[s Iha[ come wi[h Justice
Department fundmg,
Ensuring Aceess to Federally Assisted Ptograms
As you know, Federal laws prohibn recipients of financtal ass�stance from discr�minanng on the basis of race,
color, national origin, religion, sex, or disability in fundeA programs or ac[iv�ves, no[ only m respec[ to
employmen[ prnc[ices but also in the delrvery of services or benefits. Federal law also prohibits funded progams
or ac[rvifles
from discnminahng on the basis of age in the detivery of secvices or be�fits.
Providing Services [o Limited English Pro6ciency (LEP) Individuals
in accordance with Depaztrnen[ of Jusuce Guidance pertaining [o Title V I of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42
0.S.0 § 2000d, recipients of Federal financial assistance mus[ take reasonabie s[eps [o provide meaningful access
to their programs and activities for persous with lim�ted English proficiency (LEP). Fot more informa[io� on the
civil rights responsibili[ies tha[ rec�pienLS have in providing language services [o LEP md�viduals, pleue see the
websi[e at http://www.lep.gov.
Ensuring Equal Treatment for Faith-Based Organizations
The Depaztmen[ of Justice has pubLshed a regulation specifically pertaznmg to the funding of faith-based
organizations. In general, Ihe regulaUOn, Participauon m JusUCe Depaztmen[ Programs by Rel�gious Organ�zaUOns;
Providing for Equal TreaUnent of ail Jus[ice DeparUnent Program Pazticipants, and known as Ihe Equal Trea[men[
Reguta[ion 28 C.F.R. part i8, requires S[ate Admmistering Agencies to trea[ these organiza[�ons the same as any
other applican[ or rec�p�ent. The regulabon prohibiu Siate Adm�mstermg Agencies from makmg awazd or gran[
administration decis�ons on the buis of an organizadon s rehgious charac[er or affiliavon, religious name, or the
religious compostGOn af its boazd of direcmrs.
The regulation also prohibits faith-based organizavons from usmg financial usistance from Che Department of
Justice to fund inherently rehgious acUVifies. V✓hile faith-based organiza[ions can engage m non-funded
inherenUy religious activities, they must be held sepazately from Ihe Departmen[ of Jus[ice funded progam, and
customers or beneficiaries canno[ be compelled to pazlicipa[e in them The Equal Treatrnent Regulanon also makes
clear that organizations participating m programs funded by the Depamnent of 7ustice are not permrt[ed to
discriminate in the provis�on of services on ihe basis of a beneficiary's religion. For more mformat�on on [he
regulanon, please see OCR's websrte a[ http://www.o�p.usdoj.gov/ocdettUo.htm.
b8' 1 �7
State Adminis[ering Agrncies and faith-based orgaivaations should also note that the Safe Streets Ac[, as
amended; [he V icums of Crime Ac4 as amended; and the Juvenile lusuce and Delinquency Re�ention Act, as
amended, cont2io prolubitions agains[ discriminaGOn on t6e buis of retigion in employment. Thue empioymen[
provisiont have been specifically incoxporated into 28 GF.R. Part 38.1(� and 382(�. ConsequenUy, in many
c"ucumstances, i[ would be impermissible for faith-bazed organizavons seelung or rueiving funding autf�onzed by
tLeSe siatutes [o have polic�es or practices thal wndiUOn lilring and otf�er employment-xelated duisions on Ihe
rel�gion of applicants or employees. Progrnms subject to these nondiscrimination provisions may be found on
OCR's website at http9/www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ocr/. Quesfions about tLe regulaUOn or the siaNtes [ha[ prohibi[
discnmination in employment may he direc[ed to dus Office.
Enforcing Civ� Rights Iaws
All recipients of Fedefal financial azsis[ance, regardless of the particulaz funding source, the amount of the grant
awazd, or [k�e number of employees in the workforce, are subject [o Ihe prohibi5ons againsi uniawful
discrimmaVOn. Accordingly, OCR invesUga[es recipienu that aze the subject of discnminatlon compiaint5 from
both indiv�duals and groups. In addilion, based on regulamry rnteria, OCR seluts a number of recipients each year
for wmpliance rev�ews, audtts If�ac require reciQients ro submn data showing Iliat they are providing services
eqmtably [o all segments of their serv�ce populahon and tha[ thev employment prectices meet equal employmen[
oppoRUnity standazds.
Complying with the Safe S4eets Act or Program Requirements
In add�tion [o these geueral proh�bitions, an organization which �s a reapien[ of financial assistance sub�ect to
tkie nondiscrimination provisionc of the Ommbus Crime Control and Safe Streeu Ac[ (Safe Streets Ac[) of 1968,
42
U.S.C. § 3789d(c), or o[her Federal gant pmgam reqmrements, must meet [wo add�tlonal reqUirements;(1)
complying wi[h Federal regulations pertaining [o the developmen[ of ari Equai Employmen[ Opponuni[y Plan
(EEOP), 28 CF.R § 42301-.308, and (2) submitti�g to OCR Findmgs of IDscrimmation (see 28 C.F.R. §§
42205(5) or 31 202(5)).
1) Meeting the EEOP Requirement
[n accordance with Federal regutaUOns, Assurance No. 6 in [he Standazd Asswances, COPS Assurance No. 8.6, o�
cettain Federal gan[ program requ'sements, your organization must comply w�th the following EEOP reporting
requireme�ts:
If yow orgamzation has received an awazd for $500,000 or more and has 50 or more employees (counting both
full- and part-[une employees bu[ excluding poli�cal appoin[ees), then �t hu ro prepare an EEOP and submi[ it to
OCR for review within 60 days from [he date of this letter. Foc assistance m developing an EEOP, please
consult OCR's website at http://www.ojp,usdq.gov/ocdeeop.htm. You may also request technical ass�stance from
an EEOPspecialis[ a[ OCR by diating (202) 6163208.
If your organization received an awazd between $25,000 and $500,OOp and has 50 or more employees, your
organization s[ill hu ro prepaze an EEOP, but n does no[ have to submit ti�e EEOP to OCR for review. Ins[ead,
your organizatio� has to mamtam tl�e EEOP on file and make i[ available for renew on reques[. In addiuon, your
orgamzation has [o comple[e Sect�on B of the Certification Form and re[urn i[ [o OCR. The Certrfication Form can
be found a[ hrip://www.o�p.usdoj gov/acr/eeop.htm.
If your org�wzation [eceived an awacd for less than $25,00�; or if your organiza�on has less than 50 employees,
regazdless of the amoun[ of the awazd; or �f your organizatlon is a medical ins[imtion, educauonat msntution,
nonprofit organ�za[ion or Indian hibe, [hen your orgamzation �s exempt from the EEOP requiremen[. However,
yow orgamzation must complete Secuon A of the CerGfication Fortn and rehun it to OCR. The Certifica[ion Form
can be found a[ http://www.o)p.usdq.gov/ocdeeop.h[m.
2) Submitting Findings of Discrimination
In the eveu[ a Federal or State court or Federal or Sta[e administraiive agency makes av adverse findmg of
discrimina4on agamst yow orgamzation after a due process heazing on tt�e gound of race, color, religion,
nffi�onal ongm, or sez, your organ�zatron must submrt a copy of the finding to OCR for renew.
rg -1r� �
Ensurmg the Compliance of Subre�apienfs
If your o aanizarion maku svbawazds to other agencies, you aze responsible for assuring that subrecipients also
comply with al] of ihe applicable Federal civii nghts laws, including the requiremenu pertaining to developing
and submitting an EFAP, teporting Fmdings of DiscnminaUon, and providing language serv�ces to LEP persons.
State agencies thaz make subawards mus[ have m place standard gant ass�sances and review procedures [o
demonstrate ihatShey are effectively monitoring ihe civii rights compliance of sub=ecipienu.
If we can azsist you in any way in fulf'illing your crvil rights responsibililies as a recipient of Federal fundmg,
please call OCR a[ (202) 307-0690 or visi[ ow website at http://www.o�p.usdoj.gov/ocd
Sincuely,
�f a. r�----
Michael L. Als[on
Director
cp Grant Manager
Financial Analyst
Department of Justice D � �� �Q �
- Office of 7usvice Prog-nms
� >.�'
Office of Comptroller
Washington, D.C. 20531
May 2, 2006
Chief ]ohn Hazrington
CiTy of Saint Pau1
1S Wrst Ke]Iogg Boulevazd
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Referrnce GranWumber. 20p5-MC-CX-K008
Supplemental Budge[ Number: 1
Dear Chief Hazrington:
1 am pleased to mform you Ihat my off�ce has approved the following budget categories for the aforemen[ioned grau[ award in
the cost categories identlfied below:
Category
Personnel
Fringe Benefits
Travel
Equipment
Supplies
Construction
ConVacmal
Other
Total Direct Cos[
Ind�rect Cos[
Tatal Project Cost
Federal Funds Approved:
Non-Federal Shaze:
Progam Income:
Prior Budget Supplemental Budget
$222,665 �231,834
$66,380 $86,133
$60,390 $77,770
$0 $0
$8,100 $4,050
$0 $0
$9,000 $0
$83,465 $100,213
$450,000 $500,000
$0 $0
$450,000 $500,000
$450,000 $SOO,WO
$0 $0
$0 50
Totai
$454,499
$152,513
$138,160
$0
$12,150
$0
59,000
$183,678
$950,000
$0
$950,000
$950,000
$0
SO
If you ftave questions regazding this award, please contacC �
- Rogram Questions, Christopher Holloway, Program Manager az(202) 305-9838; and U " J/ ��
- Financial Questions, the Office of the Comp�oller, CLstomer Service Center(CSC� az(800) 458-0786, or you may
contact the CSC a[ ask.oc@usdoj.gov.
Congawlations, and we look forwazd tn working with you.
Sincerely,
/ /a�r.o_ K \^ °ci
I
Mazcia Pau]]
Acting Comphollei
og-l�4'I
Department of lustice
� � Office of Sustice Programs
== Office of Javenile Jusfice
�"� and Delinquency Prevention
Cooperative Agreement
PAGE 7 OF 3
1_ REC7PIEN'lNAME AND ADDRFSS Qvc(ud'mg Zip Code)
Ciry of SamtPaW
IS Wes� i(eliogg Boulevard
Sam[ PaW, MN 55102
IA GRAN7EEIR5/V6NppANO.
416005521
3 PROSECf T7TLE
Inremet Cnmes Agains[ CLildren Tack For¢
i
i
4. AWqRD NUMBER: 2005-MGIX-K008
5 PAOIECI' PERiOD� FROM Ol/012005 ]TJ I?/31200]
BUDGEI'PERIOD�FROM OI/Ol/7A05 TO 12(i120�7
b. AWARD DA1E OSiD7R006 � 7. ACI70N
8 SUPPLEMEMPNUMHER SupplemevW
01
9.PREVIOUSAWAR➢AMOUM 54SO,ppp
lO.AMOlJNTOFTHISAWARO $Spp,ppp
IITOTALAWARD ---"–_—' �§950.000
12. SPECIAL CONDITIONS
TF� ABOVE GRAM PROJECf IS APPROVEO SUBIECT TO SUCH CONDITIONS OR LIMITATIONS AS ARE SET FORTH
ON TI-� q79'ACHED PAGE(5).
13. STATVTpRY AUTHORITY FOR GRAM
77us prqu[ is supported under 42 U.S.C. 5775 (017DP- M�ssmg Chiidren)
15 Iv�LHOD OF PAYb�NT
PAPRS
— AGENCYAPPROVAL _
16. TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF APPROVING OFFlCIAL
Regina H. Sc6ofield
Ass�stap� Aryqrney Geouai
� GRANTEEACCEPTANCE —
18. NPED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORtZED GRANTEE OFFlCIAL
loM Harring[on
Chief o£ Police
17 SIGNATUREOFAPPROVMGOFFICIAL
���5���
79 SIGNA7UREOFAUTHORIZEDRECIPIENTOFfIC1AL I 19A.DATE
AGENCY QSE ONLY -
?A ACCOUN'17NG CLASSIFICATTON CODES 21 MC067UOOp7
FlSCAL FUND BUD. DIV.
YEAR CpDE ACI'. OFC REG SUB. PoMS AMOUNT
X C MC �0 00 00 SOOU00 I
OJP AJRM 40002 (REV, 5-87) PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLEI'E
OIP FORM 4000/2 (AEV. 488)
Og-l�D�
���
r� �
z�
�ICE��`-
Department of Justice
Office of Justice Progarns
Office of Juvenile
Justice and Delinquency
Prevention
AWARD CONTINUATION
SHEET
Cooperative Agreement
! PAGE 2 OF 3
�O��NUMBER 2003-MC-CX-K008
AWARDDA'[E OSN220p$
SPECIAL CONDIIIONS
1_ The recipient agees to comply with [he financial and adminisllabve requiremenGC set forth in the current ed�tion of [he
O�ce of ]usnce Rogcams (OJP) Financial Guide.
2. The ruipien[ acknowiedges [ha[ failu�e [o submi[ an accepiable EqUal Employmen[ Oppotturlity Plan (if recipien[ is
requued to submi[ one pursuant [0 28 C.F.R. Section 42302), Ihat is approved by the Office for Crvil Rights, is a
violation of �GS Certified Assurances and may resul[ in suspens�on or [eimina[ion of funding, un[il such time as the
rectp�ent �s in comptiance.
3. The recip�ent agrees to comply w¢h the organiza[�onal audrt requirements of OMB Circulaz A-133, Audits of Sta[es,
Local Crovernments, and Non-Profit OrgamzaUOns, as fuRher described m the cutrent ediUOn of the OJP Financial
Guide, Chapter 19.
4. Recipient understands and agees that rt cannot use any federal funds, either d'uectly or mdirectly, in suppott of fhe
enacunent, repeal, modification or adopUOn of any law, regulafion or policy, at any level of govemmen4 w�thout the
express pnor written approval of O1P.
5. The re.cipiem shall submit semtannual progcess reports. Progess reporis shaf7 be submitted w�thin 30 days after [he end
of the reporting periods, which are June 30 and December 31, for ti�e hfe of Ihe award. These repor4s will be submitted
o�hne tluough [he Office of 7ustice Programs Grants Managemen[ Sys[em.
6. The recipien[ ag[ees [o submit quartedy financial repores on Standazd Form SF 269A. These repor[s w�il be submi[ted
within 45 days afrer [he end of the calendaz quarcer, and a fina( ceport is due 120 days foltowmg ihe end of d�e awazd
perrod. The reports ca� be filed online tfu'ough the Internet at: https://ganLS.ojp.usdoj.gov/.
7. The Project D'uector and key program personnel designated in the applicatlon shall be replaced only for compelling
reasons and with the concurzence of OJP. OIP will not unreasonably wi[hhold concurrence. All successors [o key
personnel must be approved, and such approval is con[ingent upon su6mission of appropnate infom�aUOn, mctuding,
bu[ not limited [o, a resume. Changes in o[her program personne] requ'ue only notificaeon to OJP and submission of
resumes, unless otherwise designated in the awazd document
8. The recipient agrees to comply wi@� ffie ICAC Task Force Program S[andards as estabhshed by [he ICAC Task ForCe
Advisory Boazd and approved by O]JDP.
9. '17�e recip�ent agrees W forwazd reports of ICAC Tuk Force Program Monthly Performance Measures to the OJJDP-
designa[ed site.
10. The rec�pient agrees to designate one of [he regjonal task forces as its representa[ive to {he ICAC Task Force Advisory
Board, This des�o at�on mus[ be in wnting and forwazded m O7]DP for approval withim m�ety days of awazd.
OR FORM 40002 (REV.488)
b� -i��7
��
-s.. ��
, _
c; .
^ "!''G'm�C.e e �
Depaxm�entoflustice I
Office of Iustice Pro�ams �
Office of Juvenile i
Justice and Delinquency ;
Prevenfion ;
AWARD CONTINUATION
SHEET
Cooperative Agreement
PAGE 3 OF 3
PROJECTNUkBER 2(p5-MGCX-K008
AWARDDA'IE OSN]120pb
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
11. The Office of Juvenile Jus4ce and Dehnquency Prevention has elected to enter mto a Coopera9ve Agreement rather
ihan a gran[ with the recipient Th�s decision refluu the mumal in[erest of @�e recipient and OlIDP in the opera[ion of
the project az well as the anticipated leve] of Federal involvement in tlus pro}ecG OI1DP's patticipamcy cole in the
project is as follows: �
a. Review and approve major work plans, indudiug changes [o such plans, and key deasions pertaining [o projec[
operaGOns.
b. Revtew and approve major pro�ect generated documents and matenals used m the provision of prqec[ services.
Provide guidanCe in signiEcant project planning meetings, and parficipate m project sponsored training events or
conferences.
12. prior to the expendiWre of co�denual funds, the recip�en[ and any subrecipientr agree [o sign a cer[ifica[ion indicaung
[hat he or she has read, understands, and agtees W abide by all of the condi[ions pertaming to confidential fund
expenditures as set forth in the OJP Financial Guide.
OIP FORM 4ppp/2 (REV. a88)
b��1�07
� `<
� � �;
� ;�
� oF,
,,.«r
Memorandum To: Officia] Grant File
Department of Justice
Office of Justice Progams
O}Jice of Juvenile Jusace and Delinquency Prevention
Woslungmn, D.0 20531
Rrom: Donn Davis,lVepa Coordinator
Subject: Categorical Exclusion for City of Saint Paul
The cecipient agrees to assist OJJDP to comply with the Nationa] Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
other related federal environmental impact analyses requuements in the use of these grant funds ei[her
directly by the recipient or by a subreciptent. Accordingly, prior to obligating gant funds, the grantee
agrees to first determine if any of the following activities will be related to [he use of the grant funds and,
if so, to advise OJJDP and request fur[hei NEPA implementation guidance. Recipient understands that
Ihis special condition applies [o its activities whether or no[ they are being specifically funded with [hese
grant funds. That is, as long as Ihe activity is being conducted by the recipient, a subrecipient, or any
third party and the activity needs to be undertaken in order to use these grani funds, this special condition
must first be met. The activities covered by this special condrtion aze: a, new construction; b. minor
renovation or remodeling of a property either, (1) listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register
of Historic Places or, (2) located within a 100-yeaz flood plain; c. a renovation, lease, or any other
proposed use of a building or facility that wil] either, (1) result in a change in its basic pnor use or; (2)
significantly change its size and; d. Implementation of a new progam involving the use of chemicals
other than chemicals that are; (1) purchased as an incidental component of a funded acUvity and; (2)
traditionally used, for example, in office, household, recreational, or educahon
�
Cc�. ur�
� � �.
, Ao.
. �1�5t
➢epanmeotofl�nce j
offuorJ,�e�an� i �
Office of Juvenile Justice and ';
Delinquency Prevention
Th�s projut is supponed under 42 O.S C 5775 (O11DP - Missing Children)
7. STAFF CONTACT (Name & felephone number)
Christopher Holloway
(?A2) 305-9838
3a TITLE OF THE PROGRAM
O11DP FY 2006Intemet Gimes Againct Children Conanuanm (CPD)
4. TITLE OF PROJECT
Inremet Cnmes Against Children Tack Force
S NAME & ADDAFSS OF GRANTEE
City of Saint Paui
I S West Keltagg Baulevard
Samt Pau7, MN 5902
7. PROGRAM PERIOD
FROM: Ol/012005
9 AMOUNTOFAWARD
$ 500,000
l I. SECOND YEAR'S SUDGE7
13 THIRD YEpR'S BUDGET PERIOD
74. TH[RD YEAR'S BUDC'EI' AMOONT
IS.SUMMARYDESCRIP7'IONOFPROIECC(Seemshucnononreverse) �
The FY 199g lusnce pgpcopciations Act, Pubhc Law (OS-l19 auNonzed $2 4 miliion m D13DP to atimula[e the creat�on of "Stare antl locai law
enforcement cyber umts [o investigate childsexual ezploi�auon" by offenders usmg tl�e Intemet or oNme communmaoons [echnology. O1JDP
developetl the ICAC Task Force Proe am [o atsist S(aCe md local law enforcement agencies to acquire the necexsaly knowleAge, eqmpment �tl
personnel resowces to preven4 mterd¢t, or mves�gate ICAC offevses.
d��l�d7
�
GRANT MANAGER'S MEMORANDUM, PT. I: �
PROJECT SUMMARY
Cooperative Agreement I
PROIECT MIMBEP, j I
! PAGE I OF 1 1
2005-MCLX-K008 i ,
2 PROIECT DiRECTOR (Name, address & telephone number)
AmyHrown
Ruearch Antl Gmnrs Managu
IS W. Keliogg Blvd .
Smnt Paul, MN 55702-2295
(65 p 26&5507
36 POMS CODE (SEE INSTRUCTIONS
ON REVERSE)
6. NAME & ADRESS OFSUBGRANTEE
8 BUDGETPERIOD
TO. t2/31/Z007 FAOM: 07/072W5 TO 1Y31/2007
(
10. DATE OF A W ARD
osrovzooa
12 SECOND YEAR'S BUDGET AMOUNT
OIPFO[ZM40pp2(REV 488)
ag-l�a �
. In FY 7998, ¢n agencies (ls[Tier) fecerved ICAC Tazk Force cooperytive a�eementt. Subsequevt aunuai fundmg Las allowed for Ne expaasio�
, of tLe ICAC progam m gow m 45 Tazk Frorces. Under rhis progam, thrse agercies serve az rcg�ouai sowces of pmventlon, educatloq and
, ivve5[igative expe�vsa m pcovide azsistaze.em pazencs, �¢3chers, law enfortement, and INher professimia4s wo:king on child vicmmzanon issues.
i 'Nith fundin� provided by Ne Fiscai Year 1JJ06 Appmpriauortt Act providu3 m O1JDP, Ne C�ty of SL Paul and the St PaW PoLce Deparm�ent wtll
I conun� iLC mulri-ageMy, muiti- discioi�nary resportse to ICAC offenses rhat is composed of federal, State, antl lacal law enforcemmt agencies
i znd child welfare orgamzavons [a 1) covduct reachve v�d proactive [CAC mvest�gauoat, 2) urve az a fo[ensic �esowce, 3�ffect�vely prosecure
� cases az the local, stare. and federal IeveLs: 4kngage in law enforcemen[ and wmmuniry ou¢each actlnues [o ixlutle: naining, tecim�cal
a¢istsnce, and preventiov aad educauon acuv�ties, S�erve az a resouxce far all communines and age�eeies widim the geo�aphic azea of
I mspoasibihry; b�ffarive(y respo� m a umely manner [o refertais from agencia (other task Porces, fede[al parme[s, Cybenipli�re, etc, 7)fortnalize
law en(orcement parmerships through wriuen ageemente (for example, memorandums of untlerstanNng); $)provide financul aesstance ro partnu
i aveK�u; 9) require Ihat pam�et agex�es adopt )CAC TaSk Force Imuhga6ve Sundards ae pohry. 70) Poily partic�pa'e in nat�onally coordmaretl
� inves[igafions (for uaznpie, Peer Precisiov. CA/CF
LAR' ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE
I�] .�, t
�
b��i�D�
Intcrnef !Cri�es r�ga�ir�st Childrea
T��l� �
�rr��
OPERATIONAL
��
INVESTIGATIVE STANDARDS
Revised: Feb 1, 2007
ICAC Program Operational and Investigative Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE Dg' ��07
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Forward
Defmitions
Section 1: Oversight
Section 2: Selection and Retention of ICAC Task Force Personnel
Section 3: Training
Section 4: Case Management
Section 5: Information Sharing
Section 6: Victim Identification
Section 7: Community Education and Crime Prevention
Section 8: Media Relations and Releases
Appendix A: ICAC Communication Plan 2005 - 2008
Appendix B: Regional ICAC Task Force Contact List
Appendix C: ICAC Training & Technical Assistance Contact List
Appendix D: National Child Victim Identification Program
ICAC Program Operational and Investigcztive Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
February 1, 2007
LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE D� � ��a �
Forward
The mission of the Intemet Crimes Against Children (ICAC)
Task Force program is to assist state and local law enforcement
agencies in developing an effective response to cyber enticement
and child pornography cases. The Intemet Crimes Against
Children (ICAC) program is a national network of coordinated
state and local task forces engaged in proactive investigations,
forensic examinations, effective prosecutions and community
education. The ICAC program was developed in response to the
increasing number of children and teenagers using the Intemet,
the proliferation of child pornography, and the heightened online
activity by predators searching for unsupervised contact with
underage victims. By helping state and local law enforcement
agencies develop effective and sustainable responses to online
child victimization and child pornography, the ICAC program
delivers national resources at the local level. In addition, the
ICAC program believes that building partnerships will reduce
child victimization, both in the United States and internationally.
The purpose of this document is to set minimum uniform
operational and investigative standards. These standards promote
consistency in investigations, referrals, prosecutions and other
aspects within the ICAC Task Force program. This document
does not intend to prohibit officials from using discretion and
best judgment in matters where personal or community safety is
at stake.
ICAC Program Operataonal and Investigative Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
February 1, 2007
Law Enforcement Sensitive �g ' � �Q /
Definitions
As used herein, the following definitions shall apply:
"OJ7DP" is the Office of Juvenile 7ustice and Delinquency Prevention.
"NCMEC" is the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
"CEOS" is the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Criminal
Division of the Department of Justice.
"ICAC" is the Intemet Crimes Against Children program composed of
Regional Task Forces and Affiliates.
"REGIONAL TASK FORCE" is defined as an ICAC law enforcement
agency designated by OJJDP to act as a Regional Task Force.
"AFFILIATE" is defined as a law enforcement agency that is working in
parinership with a Regional Task Force and has agreed in writing to adhere
to ICAC Operational and Investigative Standards.
"PARTNER" is defined as an agency assisting a Regional Task Force absent
a written agreement.
"NATIONAL INITIATIVE" is defined as any investigative proposal which
relies on the cooperation and resources of all Regional Task Forces or
mandates action by OJJDP.
`BXECUTNE COMMITTEE" is defined as the chair and the vice-chair of
the Working Group and the co-chairs of the Working Group committees.
"CVIP" is the Child Victim Idenrification Program.
For the purposes of this program, crime is defined as any offense that
involves the exploitation of children facilitated by technology.
ICAC Program Operational and Investigative Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
February 1, 2007
Dg -1�f0�
Law Enforcement Sensitive
Investigative interest is established when there is reasonable suspicion that a
screen name or other potentially idenrifiable entity has committed a crime or
that enrity is engaged in a sequence of activities that is likely to result in the
commission of a crime.
A proactive investigation is designed to identify, investigate and prosecute
offenders, which may or may not involve a specific target, and requires
online interaction and a significant degree of pre-operative planning.
A reactive investigation involves the investigation of a complaint of a crime.
Reasonable suspicion is established when su�cient facts exist to lead a law
enforcement officer to believe that an individual or organization is involved
in a definabie criminal activity.
ICAC Program Operationad and Investigative Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
February 1, 2007
Law Enforcement Sensitive v � /�� �
1• Oversight
1.1 Each ICAC agency shall haue supervisory systems and procedures, which shall
provide for observarion, documentation, and periodic review of ICAC activity.
Such system should comply with the principles of quality case management and
ensure that ICAC activities comply with both agency and ICAC Standards.
1.2 Regional Task Forces shall submit all proposed national initiarives to the Working
Group Chair and OJJDP prior to project initiation. All proposed national
iniriatives must be reviewed and approved by the Working Group Execurive
Committee prior to implementation.
13 The Executive Committee at its discretion may suggest amendments to the
original proposal following consultarion with the presenting Task Force.
ICAC Program Operational and Investigcrtive Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
February 1, 2007
���/
Law Enforcement Sensitive
2. Selection and Retention of ICAC Task Force Personnel
21 Managers and supervisors should evaluate prospective ICAC candidates for work
history that indicates prior investigative experience, court tesrimony skills, ability
to handle sensitive informarion prudenUy, and a genuine interest in the protection
of children.
2•2 Given the graphic nature of evidence routinely encountered in ICAC related
cases, the mental healtb of investigators working such cases is a great concem.
Task force supervisors at all levels aze encouraged to make reasonable efforts to
ensure that all assigned officers remain fit for duty in accordance with applicable
departmental policies and procedures.
ICAC Program Operational and Investigative Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
February 1, 2007
Law Enforcement Sensirive �g' � �J'�' �
3. Training
3.1 All Invesrigators will be supplied with appropriate iraining consistent with the
ICAC Operational and Invesrigarive Standards.
3.2 Working group members aze responsible for ensuring that the individuals
nominated for ICAC sponsored training are employed by agencies that have
agreed in writing to adhere to the ICAC standards of invesrigation and that
any prerequisite requirements for the training session have been met.
3.3 ICAC task forces may give regional training. The training shall comply with
current ICAC standards. Any subsequent support required as a result of the
regional training shall be the responsibility of the task force providing the
training.
ICAC Program Operational and Investigative Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
February 1, 2007
Law Enforcement Sensirive � / l � �
4. Case Management
4.1 Case Predication and Prioritizaiion
4.1.1 Cases may be initiated by referrals from the CyberTipline, Intemet service
providers, or other law enforcement agencies, and by information gathered
through subject interviews, documented public sources, direct observarions of
suspicious behavior, public complaints, or by any other source acceptable under
agency policies.
4.1.2 ICAC supervisors aze responsible for determining investigative priorities and
selecting cases for investigation. Assuming the information is deemed credible,
that detemuna6on should begin with an assessment of victim risk and then
consider other factors such as jurisdiction and known offender behavioral
characteristics. The following prioririzarion scale shall be considered:
a) A child is at immediate risk of victimizarion
b) A child is vulnerable to victimization by a known offender
c) A lmown suspect is aggressively solici2ing a child(ren)
d) Manufacturers, distributors or possessors of images that appear to be home
photography with domiciled children
e) Agb essive, high-volume child pornography manufacturers or distributors
who either are commercial disiributors, repeat offenders, or specialize in
sadistic images
fl Manufacturers, distributors and solicitors involved in high-volume
ttafficking or belong to an organized child pomography ring that operates
as a criminal conspiracy
g) Disiributors, solicitors and possessors of images of child pomography
h) Any other form of child victimization.
4.2 Record Keeping
4.2.1 ICAC agencies shall be subject to existing agency incident reporting procedures
and case supervision systems. At a minimum, a unique identifier shall be
assigned to each ICAC case.
ICAC Program Operational and Investigative Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
February 1, 2007
Law Enforcement Sensitive �$ � I � �
4.2.2 All affiliated agencies will report theu activity to theu respective Regional Task
Force VJorking Crroup Member by the l Oth of each month using the ICAC
Monthly Performance Measures Report.
4.23 Regional Task Forces will compile and submit their monthly performance
measures report to the OJJDP designated location before the end of the following
calendar month. This monthly report does not replace the semi-annual progess
report required by the Office of Justice Program's Financial Guide.
4.3 Undercover Investigations
43.1 Carefully managed undercover operations conducted by well-ttained officers are
among the most effective techniques available to law enforcement for addressing
ICAC offenses. Undercover operations, when executed and documented
properly, collect virtually unassailable evidence regarding a suspecYs predilection
to exploit children.
4.32 ICAC supervisors are responsible for ensuring that ICAC investigators receive a
copy of the ICAC Operational and Investigative Standards.
4.3.3 ICAC investigations shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the principles
of law and due process. ICAC investigators aze encouraged to work in
conjunction with their local, state or federal prosecutors.
43.4 The following minimum standards apply to ICAC invesrigarions:
a. Only swom, on-duty ICAC personnel shall conduct ICAC investigations
in an undercover capacity. Private cirizens shall not be asked to seek out
investigative tazgets, nor shall they be authorized to act as police agents in
an online undercover capacity.
b. ICAC personnel shall not electronically upload, transmit, or forward
pornographic or sexually explicit images.
c. Other than images or videos of individuals, age 18 or over, who have
provided their informed written consent, and at the rime consent was given
were employed by a criminal justice agency, no actual human images or
videos shall be utilized in an invesrigation. Employee is defined as a
salaried or compensated individual.
d. During online dialogue, undercover officers should allow the investigative
target to set the tone, pace, and subject matter of the online conversation.
Image transfer shall be iniriated by the target.
e. Undercover online activity shall be recorded and documented. Any
deparhxres from this policy due to unusual circumstances shall be
documented in the relevant case file and reviewed by an ICAC supervisor.
ICAC Program Operational and Investigative Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
Februazy 1, 2007
Law Enforcement Sensitive 60 � ��/� �
4.4 Evidence Procedures
4.4.1 The storage, security, and destruction of invesrigative information shall be
consistent with agency policy. Access to these files should be reshicted to
authorized personnel.
4.4.2 The examination of computers and digital media shall be consistent with agency
policy and procedure.
4.4.3 Child pomography is contraband and should be maintained pursuant to each
agency's policies regarding such. It is recommended that absent a court order
specifically ordering othenuise, evidence containing child pomography shall not
be released to any defendant or representative thereof.
4.4.4 The transfer of evidence containing child pornography among law enforcement
shall be done in a secure manner. Methods of transfer may include hand-delivery,
transmission of digitally protected files, delivery via a service which tracks the
shipment, or other methods consistenYwith agency policy and practices.
4.5 Workspace and Equipment
4.5.1 ICAC computers and softwaze shall be reserved far the exclusive use of agency
designated ICAC personnel. When possible, undercover computers, softwaze,
and online accounts shall be purchased covertly. No personally owned equipment
shall be used in ICAC investigations and all soflwaze shall be properly acquired
and licensed.
4.5.2 ICAC personnel shall not use ICAC computers, software or online accounts for
personal use.
4.53 Absent exigent or unforeseen circumstances, all ICAC online invesfigations shall
be conducted in govemment workspace as designated by the agency. Exceptions
must be approved in advance by an ICAC supervisor.
ICAC Program Operational and Investigative Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
February l, 2007
Law Enforcement Sensirive ��� J j�� 7
5. Informa�ion Sharing
51 Conventional boundaries are virtually meaningless in the electronic world of the
Intemet and the usual constraints of time, place, and distance lose their relevance.
These factors increase the possibility of ICAC agencies targeting one another,
investigating the same subject, or inadvertently disrupting an ongoing
invesrigarion. To foster coordination, collaborarion, and communication, each
ICAC agency must contribute basic case informarion to a common database.
5.2 Each ICAC agency shall contribute case information on all active investigations
(local, interstate, reactive and proactive) to a common database as designated by
the ICAC Working Group. This information should be submitted at the earliest
practical opportunity.
53 If any common tazget is identified, the initiating ICAC agency is responsible for
contacting the other law enforcement agency targeting the suspect.
5.4 Iniriating ICAC agencies should also consider contacting other local, state, and
federal agencies which may be involved in similaz investigarions.
ICAC Program Operational and Investigative Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
February 1, 2007
Law Enforcement Sensitive b�'/"i ��
6. Victim Identification
6.1 Identifying child victims is a critical element of the ICAC Program. DO7 and
O7JDP require all Task Forces to submit child victim images to the CVIP as a
means to improve child vicrim identificarion. Absent exigent circumstaaces, child
vicfim images will be sent to the CVII' consistent with NCMEC guidelines. In
addirion, ICAC agencies aze encouraged to collaborate with NCMEC to identify
children depicted in child pomography.
6_2 A focus ofthe ICAC Program is to protect children. In circumstances where
reporting of child abuse is not required under existing laws, ICAC agencies aze
strongly encouraged to report instances in which a child may be at risk for abuse
or exploitation.
63 Absent exigent circumstances, victim identifying informarion should be protected
from pubiic disclosure.
ICAC Program Operational and Investigative Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
February 1, 2007
Law Enforcement Sensitive Qg' ��Q �
7. Community Education and Crime Prevention
7.1 Prevention education acrivities aze a critical component of the OJJDP ICAC
Program. ICAC agencies should foster awazeness and provide practical, relevant
guidance to children, pazents, educators, librarians, and other individuals
concemed about child safety issues.
72 Presentations to school staff, parents, and community goups aze excellent ways
to promote awazeness. These presentations shall not depict identifiable victims,
not otherwise in the public domain; nor shall they use pomographic or sexually
explicit images. Presenters shall not discuss confidential investigative techniques.
7.3 No member of an ICAC Task Force may endorse any product or service without
the express consent of an OJJDP Program Manager. While appearing at public
presentations, ICAC members may indicate a preference for a product or service,
but to avoid an implicit endorsement, such ICAC members should indicate
adequate alternatives.
ICAC Program Operational and Investigative Standards
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
February 1, 2007