08-1273.. w � -, :.
Presented By
�
Referred To Committee: Date
AHEREAS, in 2008 the assessment rate for street paving, including curb and gutter in
connection mith the Residential Street Vitality Program (RSVP) was $35.79 per assessable
foot; and
WHEREAS, in 2008 the assessment rate for the modified lantern style lighting was $6.33
per assessable foot, and the alternative bent straw lightinq was $3.97 per assessable
foot; and
Wf�REAS, Watershed requirements have increased construction costs; and
WHEREAS, it has been a City policy to assess approximately 25$ of the construction
costs; and
WFIEREAS, in recent years actual assessments collected are approaching 20$ of the
construction costs; and
WHEREAS, bond £inancing regulations require a mi.nimum o£ 20$ be assessed to bene£iting
property owners; and
WHEREAS, a 8$ rate increase will bring assessment collections to agproximately 26.98� o£
the construction costs; now the=e£ore be it
RESOLVED, that in order for the assessment to reflect the increased constxuction costs
and benefit to the property owners, the assessment rate for street paving in connection
with RSVP is increased 8.0$ £xom $35.74 to $38.65 per assessable foot fox a11 such RSVP
projects approved by Final Order a£ter October 1, 2008, to be constructed in 2009; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the assessment rate for the modified lantern style lighting
is inc=eased 8.0� from $6.33 to $6.84 per assessahle £oot, and the alternative l�ent
st=aw lighting inc=eased 8.0$ from $3.97 to $4.29 per assessable foot fo= all such RSVP
projects approved by Final Order a£ter October 1, 2008, to be constructed in 2009
Yeas Navs Absent Reques�ed by Department of:
Carter �—
Bostrom ,/
Harris �/
He1nPn ✓
Lantrv ✓
Stark I/
Thune
�
Adopted by Council: Date f��lf,��
Adoption Certi�ied by Council Secretary
By: i .
Approved Sy r: Date t{
B y' r�� ! lA�✓�,�Y�-
Council Fi1e # ��"/a
RESOLUTION �reen Sheet � 5�b�s6�
CITY OF SAfNT PAUL, MINNESOTA
By:
Approval Recommended by ��yet Director� 1) �
By:
Form Approved by City Attorney:
$Y� �) SA� rJ1 ' �.U�F_-�
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council:
B � � ��.-�o/-/v-a��'
�
.,.��`,�
-� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
i (pJ /
Departrnentl0fficelCountil: Datelnitiated: ` �
Pw_PublicWorks o�-o�T-�$ Green Sheet NO: 3060567
Contad Person & Phone:
Dan Haak
266-6084
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date}:
Doc. Type: RESOLUTION
E-Document Required: Y
Document Contac8 Mike Thcemke
Contad Phone: 266-6087
�►
Assign
Number
For
Routing
Order
Total # of Signature Pages _(Cfip Af{ Locations for Signature}
5 7 Clerk I I �-i�Y �-�erK I
G'�^'J +5'�fA'no..� t�r�'
: �IVE�
Action Requested: ' - �� '�°,'? ��- j �
Approval of resolurion establishing the year 2009 Residendal Street Vitaliry Progrem Assessment Rates '��'� _� �'�-' a�z ��;
Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Answer the Following Questions:
Pfanning Commission 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this departmeni?
CIB Committee Yes No
Civil Service Commission � 2. Has this personlfirm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this person/i�rm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
curtent ciiy employee?
Yes No
Expiain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
In 1990, the City Council adopted a resolution calling for the assessments for CSSP projects to be adjusted each yeaz according to the
previous year's change in Minneapolis-Saint Paui Urban Consumer Price Index (90-1459). In 1995, the City Council adopted a
similaz resolufion for the ResidenYial Skeet Paving Program (95-1127). We are proposing to increase assessments rates for 2009 by
8.0% for street paving and lighting. It has been a City policy to assess approximately 25% of the construction costs; we aze very neaL
20 The Minneapolis-Saint Paul Consumex Price Index has not kept up with inflation in the Construction Industry. Sonding cequires
that a minimum of 20 must be assessed to the benefiting properties. Watershed requixements have also increased conslruction costs.
Advantages HApproved: ,
RSVP pxojects can move forward.
Assessments will meet the minunum requirement of 20% being assessed.
Disadvantages If Approved:
Assessments will be 8.0% higher for residents for Residenrial Sfreet Paving and Lighfing in 2009
ROITi'E TO f iN1T1AL
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
If the bonding requirement that a minimum of 20% must be assessed to the
funding for RSVP must be secured.
Total Amount of
Transactlon:
Funding Source:
Finarwial fnformation:
(Explain)
CosURevenue B
Activity
Accounting
DATE
i�
October 24, 2008 2:54 PM Page 1
C
r
�i3
V
d
O
L
a
�
�
�
aw
_ �
N
m �
C �
d
G �
Na
N C
N R
Q y
� �+
R O
v U
N
'�^
v/ d
W �
W �
N H
� W
O
Q
�
d
i
N
�
0
�
N
� � ° � E
O m 0 � �
W m m O
Q S F
m a '� m �
� m � y
� � = 0
°� � m
� c V �
� a e a :
N O h M �N
�n C V O m
[� N N N N
O ^ {O N (O
m �o r v
�n � m �n w
n N � � O
m o n < o
� � � M
� �
M 4 t0 N �q O]
J �� O b c) IM1 fD
O C �` O � O �
1- O b3 � M �
m �y
� � � �M � �» �
N C
�b
c
a o
¢
- m m o'� m ° o
<o v �o 0
m �w v m o ° v
y tA t9 tR e9 N
a �
o m
� � �
J F m o �o
�/1 i � v
O 2 O o o m
F U v cv ci
� � �
C T � � y
� O O G O
� N tL O �
m y c m � {+j �
� � 3 ` a� O
J `� m S
o �� = �
E �
� c m `v
y � 7 �
,� o 0
J r O
O O O
4n O O
N Q M
O tD h
� W
b N C
� � �
O O O
� � �
N N �
� F N a m
F NI c` o v
0 oi �o M N
F VI v �v M
� � �
`'. a �
� m �
N o jp O
W n c Q
� � `o ¢
LL
01
� O �O
J � J o �
o� C � O
� m vi a
a W ci �
w �
a
o m
N p A
O�i N V
� � �
O O O
O O O
ui o 0
� N N
� � �
m n a
o �n
m � �
�
� N tO
� O f0 O
d m � rn
o � � �
m .l y
� c � m
a W � � rn
c W W o 0
_m � � �
�. � d � C
N � �2 - 0
N
� � U N
rn
m
m
�
O
O
H
�
�
m
m
0
�
m
0
O
�
O
° o
�
�
c�i
m
D
N �
m r
a
�� n
o a
m o � �
$ n 2'w
y
L � $ O
9 .t_ " n
0 m �
N
.� j > N
O y a y
� y � W
t y u o
` y � N
m
�' m n�
T 11
O Q � �
�
E� mm
C a M V
W 3 y
m ^ N m
� 0 py 0
m m N N 1
0 0 � m w%
oQ � ¢�
° 2 m N o
�a� �Q
d y � o
S y w m� m
m m a o a
r p
Q y m N y
d � � m O
mmo Q'm
o a � � m
� �
�
N m �
N v
m � O � �
N � � m N
� % � �
pf m W M .
2`m� m
N �
C U 0 Q �
v o a s `
a
>. n'3 o m
s 3'Q
0 0
_ W
'°°' �
� d E a m
m T m
N y� C V °
£ ¢�
W N N
N q � �
C � y V
7 N y
O % N �F'j
� o a a m
'�ym c o
c � m N ¢
mn= a
E d —° o> >
m o � o a
h � R
Q � C d LL
Q LL
� �
p8-r��3
0
O
O
m
a
N
N
U
U
e
a