07-975Council File # � 7 � % 7 'J�
Green Sheet # .�i
CITY OF
Presented By
RESOLUTION
PAUL, MINNESOTA
��
1 WHEREA5, David Heide Design Studio (hereinafter, the "ApplicanY'), in HPC File 07-179,
2 made application to the Heritage Preservation Commission (hereinafter, "the HPC") for a
3 building permit to undertake a construction project on a residential structure categorized as a
4 "contributing property" to the Sununit West Historic District and commonly known as 1760
5 Suumiit Avenue; and
6
7 WAEREAS, In a staff report dated May 17, 20�7, it was indicated that the Applicant proposed
8 the following conshuction at the said address which required the approval of building permits by
9 the HPC:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
3Q
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
1. Replace existing front retaining wall, walkway, steps. The retaining wall
has a brick coping and the applicant is proposing to install a limestone cap
instead. According to the applicant, the brick edging on the sidewalk does
not appear original and it is not proposed to be replaced.
2.
3,
4.
Widen existing driveway from 10 feet to 12 feet.
Rebuild front entry, using same footprint but adding a porch roof with
support columns.
Construct a small two-story addition at the southwest (rear) corner of the
house.
5. Construct a one-story addition at the southeast (side and rear) comer of the
house. Both additions would require the removal of original windows
with brick surrounds, brick and stucco walls, and some older railings.
(Unclear if original)
6. Replace the three existing wood exterior doors with similar design; and
WHEREAS, on May 24, 2007, after having provided notice to affected property owners, the
HPC conducted a public hearing on the said building permit application where all interested
parties were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, at the close of the public hearing, the HPC, based upon all the testimony and
records before it, moved the following. (1) to approve the rear additions as proposed on the
plans; and (2) to deny the proposed alterations to the front enhy as well as the proposal to
replace the brick coping on the retaining wall with limestone, subject to those certain conditions
stated below, based upon the following findings set forth in and amending the HPC's May 17,
2007 report, as provided to the applicant in a letter from the APC dated May 29, 2007:
The properiy is considered conh to the character of both local and
national registrar Summit Avenue West Historic Districts.
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
b5
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
2. The greatest changes proposed that will require the loss of character
defining features aze the front enhy changes, the brick retaining wall and
the infilling of the L-shaped plan with the one-story addition. Two of the
changes are at the front of the property, very visible from the avenue and
the addition is at the side and rear, which is minimally visible. The
guidelines state, "decorative azchitectural features such as cornices,
brackets, railings, and those around front doors and windows should be
preserved" and "all work should be of a character and quality that
maintains the distinguishing features of the building and the environment.
The removal or alterarion of distinctive azchitectural features should be
auoided."
Front entry - The proposal to replace the front entry hood and extended
over to the brick wall with new column supports does not comply with the
guidelines and alters an important feature of the house. In A Field Guide
to American Houses, for asymmetrical, front entry prairie style houses, it
states that the front entry is usually inconspicuous with the facade being
domanated by horizontal rows of casement windows having sharply
defined vertical detailing. Of course, many variations can occur, but the
enhy on this paxticular house is somewhat inconspicuous with bands of
casement windows. Adding a larger enhy porch with columns brings
attention to the new construction and is not compatible with the original
design intent.
4. Retaining wall, sidewalk and driveway - To replace and rebuild the
existing retaining wall using and salvageable brick with new closely
matching brick complies with the guidelines, however, changing the
coping from brick to limestone changes an important feature. The brick
coping relates to the brick coping on the entry wall and that band follows
around the entire perimeter of the house. While a ten foot wide driveway
is considered sufficient far a single family property, widening the
driveway will have minimal impact; however, the driveway apron width
should be maintained. The loss of the brick edging along the sidewalk
will also have minimal impact to the historic integrity of the site.
Two-story northeast corner addition - The two-story addition is at the back
of the property and would require very little loss of any character-defining
features. The existing windows do not haue the brick trim that is on the
rest of the house. There is also a setback on the new addition with the
main side elevation and the roof change is still dropped from the main
ridgeline of the house.
6. One-story addition - The overall design of the addition is compatible with
the size, scale, massing, height, rhythm, color and material of surrounding
structures in the area and complies with those guidefines. Given the large
backyard, the rhythm of greenspace to nearby buildings is still consistent
with existing patterns. The addition would require the loss of a large band
of casement windows trimmed with brick. These bands wrap azound three
sides of the west wing on two stories and are an important prairie style
feature. This addition is on a secondary elevation and wi11 not have a
negative impact.
a 7-g7�
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
Porches and Decks - The proposed stairs and brick walls at the ground 7 �
level are integrated into the overall building design and comply with the (/ 7'���
guidelines.
Provided that the Applicant abide by the following conditions of approval regarding the rear
additions to the said structure:
Any revisions to the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by
staff and/or the HPC.
The HPC stamped approved construction drawings remain onsite for the
duration of the construction project.
3. The existing rear elevations will be photo-documented prior to demolition
and new construction and submitted to the HPC for the files; and
WHEREAS, on or about June 6, 20Q7, David Heide Design Studio, pursuant to Legislative
Code § 73.06 (h) duly filed an appeal from the decision of the HPC and requested a public
hearing for the purpose of considering the action taken by the HPC; and
WAEREAS, on June 20, 2007, a public hearing was duly conducted before the City Council
where all interested parties were given and opportunity to be heard and, at the close of the public
hearing, the City Council, having heard the statements made and having considered the
application, the testimony, the report of the staff and the record, minutes and resolution of the
HPC; does hereby
RESOLVE, that the decision of the HPC approving those aspects of construction proposed at
the rear of the subject structure, subject to those certain conditions imposed by the HPC, is
hereby affirmed as the Appellant has not demonstrated any errors in the facts, findings,
procedures ar conditions imposed by the HPC and the Council adopts the findings of the HPC
made in this regard as its own; and be it
FIJRTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council finds error in the decisions of the HPC to deny
the proposed front entry construction as well as the proposal to replace the brick coping on the
retaining wall with limestone.
Notwithstanding the Council's finding of errar in the HPC's decision to deny replacement of the
brick coping, the Council finds that replacing the coping brick with limestone, as proposed by
the Appellant, will change an important feature of this contributing property. Therefore, the
Council approves using a new material as a cap on the retaining wall, subject to the condition
that the material used wi11 be mare compatible with the current visual characteristic of the wall
which is that it is mainly dark brown in color. Granting this aspect of the appeal by the
imposition of this condition will aid in complying with the guidelines of the Historic District
which state that the visual qualities of historic elements should be maintained.
The Council further recognizes the importance of preserving historic features in order to
maintain the integrity of historic districts. However, the Council finds that the HPC erred when
it denied the ApplicanYs request to extend a front entry hood. The Council finds that a covered
front entry on this contributing property can be accomplished provided that the new enhy feature
is designed appropriately. The Council approves such a covered front entry provided that the
Applicant presents a front entry design to the HPC far approval that better relates to the unique
qualities of this contributing properiy. Such a front enhy includes an extended entry hood with
or without columns, and be it
151 FURTHER RESOLVED, based upon the preceding paragraphs, that the Appeal of the David
152 Heide Design Studio is in part denied and in part granted to the extent noted herein and subject
l53 to the approval of the HPC; and be at
is4 67�1�5
155 FINALLY RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to the
Appellant, the HPC, the department of safety and inspections and the zoning administrator.
By.
Approved by
/d/L3
Requested byDeparGnentof
Fortn
�
B
Adoption Certified by Council Seqetary
Form Ap roved by City Attomey
g �f�fJa-,�- �'1 - z �- 0 7
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
b 7-97�
ca -c, A���
I ConWCtPerson 8 Phone:
� Peter Wamer
266-8710
Doc.Type: RESOLUTION
E-Document Required: Y
DocumentConWCt: JulieKraus
Contact Phone: 266-8776
03-OCT-07
�
Assign
Number
For
Routing
Order
Total tf of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature)
1. Has this personlflrm ever worViced under a contract for this department?
Yes No
2. Has this person/firtn ever been a city employee? '
Yes No
3. Does this personffirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
current ciry employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answere on separete sheet and attach to green sheet
Memorializing City Council's June 2Q 2007 motion to adopt the findings of the Heritage Preservation Commission made in this
regard to deny in part and grant in part the appeal of David Heide Design Studio for the properiy commonly known as 1760 Summit
Avenue in 5aint Paul.
iaanons: npprove (H1 or rt
Planning Commission
CIB Commiftee
Civil Service Commission
(nitiating Pro6lem, lssues, Opportunity (Whq What, When, Where, Why):
The Council is required pursuant to the City Charter to have its actions reduced to wnting either in the form of a resolution or
ordinance dependent upon the nahue of the matter before it. The decision of Council in thts matter required a resolurion in order to
comply with the Charter. Approving the attached resolution fulfills the Council's dury under the Charter. ,
AdvanWges If Approved:
None
DisadvanWges If Approved:
Failure to approve the resolution violates the Ciry's Charter requuement.
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
Transadion:
Funding SourCe:
Financial lnformation:
(Explain)
CostlRevenue Budgeted:
Green Sheet NO: 3044699
o c�ro nnoroev I I — yj � , ,, �
1 'tyAttomev I DeD�entDirector : Q'✓ w'?��
2 Ciry Attoruev I I
3 , ayor's Office I iYIavor/ASSisiant �
4 iCouncil ! '
5 'CiN Clerk Citv Clerk I
r���
Activity Number. , �((��
� ,. . ��. .. . f.': �..
October 3, 2007 10:22 AM Page 1
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
ChristopherB. Coleman, .Ltayor
June 6 2007
Ms. Mary Erickson
City Council Research Office
Room 310 City Hall
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Dear Ms. Erickson:
DEPARTMENT OFSAFETY ANDINSP6CTIONS
Bob Kessler, Daector / �� 7 �`
1/ / ���
COMMERCEBUILD/.VG Telephone 6.i1-266-9090
8 Fourth Stmet East, Surte 200 Facsrmile G�l-?66-9/1A
St Paul, Mrnnesola SJI07-1024 Web ��'�vw Lep us
I would ]ike to confirm that a public hearing before Yhe Ciry Council is scheduled for
�,'ednesday, June 20, 200? :o: the fo.lowing heritage p;ese:vation case:
Appellant(s):
File Number:
David Heide, David Heide Design Studio
07-179
Purpose: Appeal of a Heritage Preservatio❑ Commission
decision denying alteration of the &ont entry
canopy and altaration of a front brick retainiug wall.
Location
Staff
Recommendation:
Commission:
1760 Summit Avenue, Summit Avenue West
Historic Dish'ict
Lay Over (in order to consider other solutions and
resubmit)
Denial (6 to 2)
I have confirmed this date with the office of Council Member Pat Harris. My undersCanding
is that this public hearing request will appear on the agenda of the City Council at your
earliest convenience and that you will publish notice of the heazing in the Saint Paul Lega]
Ledger. Thanksi
Please call me at 266-9079 if you have any questions.
Sincerely, �
�°�
�
Amy Spong
Historic Preservarion Specialist
CC: Counci] Member Pat Harris
CAq Peter Warner
Appellant, David Heide Design
Owners, Paul Padratzik & Debra Asplund
File
AA-ADA-EEO Employer
NOTICE OF PUBLIC I�ARING
17ie Sa"u}t PavI City Council wili con-
duct a publ3c heazing on Wednesday,
June 2Q 2007, at 5:30 p.m. in the GYty
Covncff Chaznbers, Third Floor, C�ty Hall/
Courthouse, 15 West Kellogg'Boulevard,
St. Panl, MN, to consider the appeal of
David Heide, David Heide Design Studio,
to a dectision of the'Heritage Presecvation
Commission denying alteration of - the
front entry canopy and alteration of a
front brick retaining wall at 176b Sumu�it
Avenue, Summit Avenue West Historic
Dishict. (FYIe No. �7-179)� . �
Dated: June 6, 2007 - -
MARY ERICIiSON, �
Assistant City Covncff Secretary
(June ll)
__ _—= 31: PAUL LEfrAf. LEnGE& —s==�=
22140364 � � �
DEPAR OF SAFETY AND NSPECTIONS
Bob KeSSIer, Drrector D �
LJ
CITY OF SANT PAliL
Chrutapher B Coleman. ,blrryor
FROM: Amy Spong, HPC sta��
RE: HPC appeal for 1760 Summit Avenue, Summit West Historic District
DATE: June 13, 2007
COVfMERCE BUILDNG Telephone: 6�1-266-9090
8 Founh Street E, Suite 200 Facsimile: 6� 1-266-9121
$aint Paul, Minnesota 55I01-1024 \{'eb: wu1� ci stpaul mn usq�ep
Bob Kessler, DSI
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council Members
CC: Peter Warner, CAO
The following attachments high4ight the events that have taken p{ace and refate to the
HPC review of the permit application to add a columned porch at the front entry and to
alter the front brick retaining wall at 1760 Summit Avenue:
Page 1
Notice to City Council to schedule appeal.
Pages 2 to 37
Grounds for an appeal by appeliant David Heide Design Studio.
Pages 38 to 43
The staff report recommending a layover and reconsideration of certain items, including
the retaining wall and front entry changes.
Pages 44 to 67
The application with attachments.
Pages 68 to 71
Summary minutes from the May 24 public hearing.
Pages 72 to 73
The finai decision letter denying the retaining wall and the front entry proposal.
•
SAiRT
PAUL
�
AAAA
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
Christopher B Colen:an, 1layor
June 6, 200�
Ms. Mary Erickson
City Council Research Office
Room 310 Ciry Hall
Saint Paul, MN SS1Q2
Dear Ms. Erickson:
DEPARTMENT OFSAFETY ANDiNSPECTIONS
Bob Kesster, Director
0 7-9��
C0111fERCEBCILDI\'G Telephone. b�1-766-909D
8 Fowth Street East. Smte 200 Facsiinde 6� 1-266-9)N
StPaul..Nfnnesola�J101-107{ I1�eb- u'uv�.l+epus
I would like to confirm that a public hearing before the CiTy Council is scheduled for
Wednesday, June 20, 2007 for the following heritage preservation case:
Appel lant(s):
File Number:
Location:
Purpose: Appeal of a Heritage Preservation Commission
decision denying alteration of the front entry
canopy and alteration of a front brick retaining wall.
•
Staff
Recommendation:
Commission:
David Heide, David Heide Design Studio
07-179
1760 Summit Avenue, Summit Avenue West
Historic District
Lay Over"(in order to consider other solutions and
resubmit)
Denial (6 to 2)
I have confirmed this date with the office of Council Member Pat Harris. My understanding
is that this public hearing request will appear on the agenda of the City Council at your
earliest convenience and that you will publish notice of the hearing in the Saint Pau] Legal
Ledger. Thanks!
Please call me at 266-9079 if you have any questions.
Sincerely, �
���
Amy Spong
Historic Preservation Specialist
CC: Council Member Pat Harris
� CAO, Peter Warner
Appellant, David Heide Design
Owners, Paul Padratzik & Debra Asplund
File
AA-ADA-EEO Employer
�
6 June 2007
Amy Spong
City of St. Paul Dept of Safety and Inspections
8 E. Fourth St. #200
Saint Paul, MN 55101-1024
Re: 1760 Summit Avenue, HPC File #07-179
Dear Ms. Spong:
David Heide Design Studio wishes to appeal to the City Council the Heritage
Preservation Commission's denial of our proposed alterafion to the front entry and
replacement with limestone of brick coping on the retaining wa11 at 1760 Summit
Avenue.
Proposed reconstruction of brick retaining and entry sfoop walIs with new stone coping
(cap�grotmds for appeal:
1. Tbe existing brick coping is not original; iYs color and finish do not match the
wa11 below. The original coping material is unknown.
2. There is no evidence to suggest that the existing stone coping on the cheek •
walls of the front entry stoop is not original. It sets a precedent for the use of
stone on the property.
3. The e�sting brick coping on the reta.ining wall and the entry stoop has failed
and has compromised the wa11s below, necessitating their reconstruction. The
brick coping on the wa11 has atready been replaced at least once. Stone will
perform significantly better. With many fewer joints in the top of the walls,
the coping and the walls will last much longer. Though stone coping is more
expensive than brick coping, it is a better, long-term solution which the
propetry owners strongly prefer.
4. In recognition of the better performance of stone coping and the poor
performance of brick coping, there is a general precedent along Smnmit
Avenue, and a specific one for Prairie Sryle residences, for both new and
original brick walls with stone coping. The HPC's denial is, therefore,
inconsistent, azbitrary, and capricious. (See attached photos and building
permit. Also note precedent of house immediately to west at 1770 Sununit
which has brick coping at entry stoop and replacement front brick retaining
wall with stone coping.)
5. Replacement of the brick coping with stone would not be an insignificant
change, but it would not have a significant adverse impact on the historic and
architectural integrity of the pmperty.
�J
Z
S63 GRAifI EXCNflfYGE HVfL�fIYG, Mlfll'IET170LI5, MII'1fIESOTA 5541b re� 612.337.5060 F�x 612337.505➢ qa.oxD,md,o,om �
b7-��5'
�
Proposed front porch roof—grounds for appeal:
1. The proposed alteration would take the profile or shape of the existing entry
hood to create a roof over the existing front entry stoop. The roof design
acknowledges and reflects a porch and entry hood design commonly found on
Prairie Style houses of this type and period.
2. The proposed alteration is a reasonabie accommodation that is compatibie
with the azckutectural integrity of the house. The existing entry hood provides
practically no weather protection. The owners wish to have some weather
protection at the primary, front entry. In addition, the entry faces north and
there is a problem with ice accumulation. The proposed alteration is for
practical, and not aesthetic, reasons.
3. The asynunetrical, side-entry stoop (steps aze on the side—not the front)
makes a larger, bracketed hood very problematic and undesirable, as one
would walk into the bracket upon entering or departing.
4. There is a precedent for porches on Prairie Style residences of this type
throughout the city. (See attached photos.)
5. There is a precedent within the body of work of J. W. Lindstrom, a
Minneapolis azchitect who designed the subject house at 1760 Suminit
Avenue and authored a number of building plan books during the 1920s and
• 1930s, for Prairie Style residential buildings with front entry porches
supported by columns—including one with virtually the same entry porch as
that proposed. (See attachments.)
During the HPC's discussion of the proposed porch roof, commission members gave the
applicant the impression that they were okay with the concept of the front porch roof but
had some concerns about the details. The commission's action, however, was denial
rather than concept approval.
The property owners want to make a significant investment in the property. They also
understand and respect the historic integrity and significance of the property and the
historic district. They and we believe the proposed work that is the subject of this appeal
maintains the historic and azchitectural integrity of the property, conforms to the histaric
district guidelines, are reasonable accommodations for the continued use and long-term
maintenance of the property, and would not have a significant adverse impact on the
property's historic and architectural integrity.
1�
�
3
, , :.; , } ... ' :,, ; `�
.. = .' .. ... � N � � . A t #�
- A . 1 3 5➢- . �'`�
+� �� ..Q . � � � 1 �'`2q
Y $yY
1 '
� � a SI
� ; "� � , :c �r<.
. � i 4� � ��
�
� # � �
. ce � . Y :i � F x '�...
> 6 � �
;..�.. � � Y &
3 �� �
1 � � _ � �v
. x i '�� _k .?
7 � �
y
r �' � �� , � � `i . .; R� � .
' F . �_ F � .: -
s � � � � 5 +� � .. �= q�v_x
� isY i
�
+4 S`; � � �".' ,
£ y ,
' . � '�� 3 `� za .
�n 9 M1
d -'�q� . �u�'� �
�� 3 s ��� s
�
�f ^:, . .. �i �� _ �,r�`+.s � �, .
a � '� r � � ' ..,��.�
� t ,
.�:
� - � # _ � s�o-� �
d � ^} � �r�
i � s � �
� ���P.� _ � , b S �.`�
+ u ; , �5. � � = r" k g � �
��.�'m Ad . ` � C t s � � t � `''d
' y � �� ti,. t�"� .,���f . - x 3' a � 'z � 5� a s�--„�
�--r, ` � i 6 �,� '�ad
� � ���^�^�.�-`.��" " r s = .
� � ` � + :� � � � �� � �
� F k ��
s" �..""i"�F � t t t 't�h+�f.> i+u+ ^R`
� Trs.?� 4 's�� ` � �. .. � ° � �[ �— ,��'°"e�
�r � � _ � � � �� 3 s ..� T'"�; ;�
�� 1 �;' � ) . £ i '4 .+' cF €' � � �
e�3` '�m � `^S j '-�".�" „{� � � y
'�WA�� ��� 2' � .t �.�i'i� 5
� t _ �
3 � £ � i
A �
t �
���� r
?� `
'*+a�A. y�' S a _
N '
e =
� � 3 � p �e
� `9 � 't' R 5' rc 3 � '_P' � F'y ���'° � � •�?'� �� « F q w 5 � ._ � T.
r-
e � 'a�`'� � � � � f � j C � � ` � � 4' f g � ;
e 4 } �^ �.
sc" Y r *1-'` '- L. � C re � � � "� � # � .� a i � �^'�i � f � x
� � � ; 3
. q.�. �a"nY �"$
S � _ .� . 3 �� F � { F � � 3 �,
�..4 "� �� n . d �r`"'� � i"` i # . % � i
y` ,?"' E '�t�+ ^"^� )�
3 :'�� 5 Tx x,' �e2� _ $�-�� ,. � �'N �y�'" v'tac i i
�` .�� �� Y � � � � � a��n .
�� d ' '� � st';� y.fi '3' "z , � '�. �` � - -n,. � tT � � . .
!r' � � i� � � �
�� � 3 - '.N. �. 9 R�� ' .
i e `. 3 _ " � �..�
� b .. � } .. ..
j �',�.�F' _ 4 "�� � ���
�
s
��� +a: 6 _ x
- , '��� S� � .-
' ' � �'� ,p ' _
� � �� �
_ � ' ". . � r�� . `e ..� .
_ . . , .. _ �� i
...... b .,r �'� - i
� '
� _ . . � �x' ..
� �: �
'? �
a
. . . . . . . . � �.0 . � .. .
k°� { "��� � � £' :'�
r <��.� �
_ � � � ,�'� �"��
h � 6
% �� `'� � �
Y „J
� , _ � 1 �{¢����* �':
S 1
-�� h
Fl y s � � � ! � _ '.
4 `� y .T� F ; � !y � ��
; � se.Y.� � . ���� )
� '� �.��+'$'4�"� � .��
__..« �t ��4\ Y�'<si:..�±
..? ,����; ° �'-���
.e s� ` n � � � 7 �� ^-,
i ���`.�.u�-�
�c:`�'a �� „ .
� ���� � ��
f
i�. ` �.�� W`� � �
i � � ,
A, � ����
, �.., e p P .. �' .�'rp�
3` M -Tc
� �'� �'+ �, " .
� '- � �
`_ �.- ;
—� �
^� . �,�. �� ..
:�'4 F.
� `c � �. ;°
� � s
�,
' \ .. y tas. �
_ 9 4 .y .,
y b � 4 `L .
a
'� �
.. . _. .. 3. . , ly�
���
� ��
c+a�
� � T �
('
k
� � �;• �
� ��°�
� �
� ���
, _ .. �
�, p �� �;� "
;s" ' — �
� �• ��
x ` �
+�
��
, � -
� ��, -
� � -
�_ � �
Y i 3 S
fF �
P�]y � Y
�= a� ".
�. -., -
� K�� j�n l � . . _
9 � t�� � �
\ j
7�j � _. - ,_ �} � •�
F I
f-, j , �'_
� : ,�
t; ;;��
� �r �'t. � �rtY$ �'.
�
r : g kt .?��
a � 'S � } � �.
c� `' .'r r � � �
� �
� h 4�?: i � -.. r�i. -_
�� '� 3
' "#.. . :��::
��� 4 � A
2
C S � S 1 ��
P
r� ' . ' 4 A ��
4. , m
` N +2
� +
�
1 p �
t R �:
.:��z �?`. _
s 5s� ;:
�.t �..
°m
:
+o - i
Y
s
_ ,± %. ,
� .
�� � '
�, -�< ' -
, �'-'�`-
�' _ � _..
d. S d � �`�� -%
2 j^ �
S J��i * �iCG..
.. t � ,-
�. ��i�
T �
� �� �
.',�. :.,'� a �"�" , :
y -a
�� * �
� ��*��
��,
.y � ', �. F � ` Z
�
'z �1'
���� ,�:� � �
�
5.
a�
�
_ ,�
_ � � �� �
� � ��
�
-, i .
� �
�- i
�
` r
' _
� `'>
1 �'� � A .
4
� _'
' fi
_ �� �? �
d i
} .R 4
f j� � � ' . .., _
_ � k
� J J _
: t � g ` _
�� —
� <— _ �� � �
_.. §1`. �.: . .
r� E
� �
� - _
��"..:�- ']'.
� —
} 1 k _
a j
� � �# , _
��� � �
� � ,�
w �
�
'�1j 3 ��
��� .
� L Fi �"' ��.
L
��� �
d '� 4, .,�`' ��,.?��
3� �
-5- -./�. '•�
' 4� . �r
'�d�, � �* � -t: .
�� � �. `. ....,��,�Y°'.- r
�.A s: :'s,� :
_ � � f - �T' • v _t
i
'r �` d` �s �.�" ' `iT3
` � 5k
__ ��.." ���' �
a ,
� ,+ F , ��,� � -.
s k
-� s " �'ed�
��� �� � ,�<�.;_
_ �'i'.`: � �''.a �s�. _ _,
µ
"� �"'
�
�
„`S
x ,
u�
n ���'
.�t� ^ ".
s
��
%g
F` r '�
�
—. � :
` g -,
� :
t�,a' -
� .�
�,
; ki� ;
x
i.
a� �
� ��t�
> �"c�s �eu-:.
# t� `
' -
1�i�
� � ..
Y�� -�',�8,^. '� _
� ��
a �,t"� ,
�
��,�', v . , . �.a. . ..
C a
S
s: F
t
m�
�
h
� .
��':�
�. . . _�:,..._�.. _.�
���. � �
��
9 ,
�°.
t �
er�a
� � ��":��'.
#v ,.
. .. . . �-� �;
;�t�b
�� ��sr. "
�a� �Y ` � "`_
<� �: � �;��^��: ��� � �<.�
� s
� ���
R"' � �t i --�
�� .� °
� ��� � t,,a � _
� ��' �� � �q.� � ��„.
� '`� � �`�_ � � �°� ��:: '` :� ,
_ s _ �,
� _'. = �
,�M � �
� �
�
r�° � � �
� € �����
�
' a�
1 ��
� ; ��
� _ ��
��
� ��:
� # S
4
3 �
�:: . . ' . :..:.:_ .. . c?� ... :a:
C�
�
n
fo
r+
N
�
�
0a
, 1
�J
�
r.
O
7
�
n
0
-o
�
oc
�
�
0
�
�
�
�»
� •
�
v
.�
0
�a
�
�
� �
I
i g
i
E
43 rv:z - ^# �1.:+�'_
�� � F a
3 ' 4� ,
s � �� -' ?:
J- } � -
. � . S
2 . V /Yl 1 �' 'GL
4 ` � � y
t £ r�
� ,Y
' "<'.
. f
�i `
`� _ 9 �9
�' k � r
��', ' � �' ,.
P r l�rs
?� .�
r-.
_"'� �' ° R
a�'. ;''�'s4.
a; J T l��
a ��
/� � �,ps �s
f�'5��.P xfW i
� �� 4
. 9: .� � � °",�
�
is��
�S>
S,.i'
'� .
x„�q .,. �r � i
�� ,�.�: 3 � , k.#*.r`E�
`.
[ �_ n
�.:°, !
a F*e x ' s
�." . y .'. * i 'a
i ' � fm
� ��}�
'P
'�
; y °x
{ �t!X
: � z�
y �
��
�� � �
� � n a .'.�pF
rt .� 'q}
}i A�
t
� w `.�
T � • �-'
p a
. s n`�z�'-�+:.- �2ai
.,=, y
6
_
, y >�.,-. _.
�»-;, s �� '`: � t'�
�� � � K
�i'y '
� S� ,., v . �e� •
�.*
� �
� ��'.
4z '.
a
5....- txi.<.
c
.�-_�- o__
`,�. _
� .�.
z �`{' '•
# —�
3.
� :� �
� � 5 �
� � �
� ��� �_ �
t � � i�� 3
' i i
�w �
a� •
��:
� 5 , �
�
L
���' >
�� � t
� �V !� .� #T� u.
"Y F ,
;: ��.
� � �:
�S#
E 5' .
� s
4 E' 3
_ � i
{ Y
.. . �,�t : � t
��
k
r
�� ��
. , 1 � Y F�
�� ,
_ v�i� .l.. ����.
X
��
�
� �
6x a� .
. _ k ; r ^ 'i' � .
3g'
�
«�
�. � �
a ^�
v} � r
3�
x�
�� .
� � ���F, ...:��i3�S T . .
' �l` . `a;�4� •. • ..... .
,. � �� . �.r.
�� r� `
..¢ � ' ��'i d��.� � tn•j ' �
. � � �`j ,". t $ � e.
' 2 s �+< ��� � g.
��i��` '� . � �
::>j�r�� a�' � .�!!
__ C .i
. �� ,ar��Rt�. .:. . �
. . -� � �. -_ . r �� • ..- s
�_� d � .E �� .�
U 4 ' �t
�� iyy-
��n '�
i--.. :. �.. ,-
,}
l
��..
. '�Fe, ��..
— ` _. . �' I . . . f . n
� '
t a
' ,�.=
. .,� ""� - . _
�
a�+,
�
y
E� '
b
+�
�
, �
- - �
> $• '
l4 I=_
f
ait�
:?l S.
� .. ; :
# i � �
�� � .'
- x T
i � ( °
+ SJ � MiJ.
7 � S . � :_..# ."v
� � y d
r.r �
� �
� � �,� ?y .'�'�+ z 3"-..
ii . � 1;�
�
�
i¢
„� �:
�
i
�°u
� ��s' `23 S s�2��. .. .
, `�^� t u'h5? ��
t
� ,� '; ,� J �� x*., .:� � '
g � � pl d S
� � i��#' .,�'f 5 � '��;� r/Y � Tt. .
���i�"�� £ �.+% 't � � . 1
e ' fi ,.:< d '�.5� t U a . ��� ..z,.�.+zi. ��w'w�- „!��
aiY
�� �
i�
`ti �
�:._ ,-�
��
� �� - F �
.��_
__ '�� �
- •�`r-"" i�,�,. "^ .,
� , .... .B. 4: I
° . +�;, 4.;���.
�.
,.��+V,yr �Y �"=:
� _. ?t j��' . iPy�a! , �, ° y'
1 ' 1
� ... � ra4't ..9-."
Y 'w`R' �
� �. „- a + � r
e
� - `�
r
�` F ly M
i�v , ` "
F� �
� � r ?S
�,.sa'�'� .
y i �-, . .��:.
°
Z
r -v.:�_ .!. '�> .
�
£��
r
x Y ) �
�s:�e.� i � .
1 1 , �.
,�� �
L j
�`
� �� ?
.� � � � �
;�� �. � �'
� �.
' ��
� ��
_.�_ �:
z "'- .
� �
� �s3t
�`� �xcu;�:
n 3 qy��� 5
�..{. ��� ��
i_
#ti
.,.
a�
.
* .
i � µ .
�. `�'.'_.c,-
� � ��;�-
. ., �
4 .,� �
f4.
� "
- €� � ,.•_
-- e�
�`
.� � ,� E.
.�r'' .s � -t r-
�
y;> ;
- � �,
�°� ` - --s
5 �-?_.� a y . .
._!: ' F' � -' .
r ,� ��
� ✓ �` 'i ` ' '�
.� .-:�-.. ;�_:_
{ y • t
( 3�._: ��:.
; �� ��
;t rs
� r 'v'
p `�
� y � �
t� t �
5 „� � { _� �� ;
� t
� '�,4 1K ; �'�t` ^,
'� `i�2'7';
s �� � 3 � 3 .
v<fi �
� ��
$��. ��4..`>. � , m
k
v 1 "
:�
_ �` ��
f '�;}� , -�
�,_
�-�
�` .c.. ° ��s�x <
_ : � , '� ,
� i
��� �- � � � ,�
, � r �
F' - � t
if
� �' � { �
p � S ...;� �=�
3 .
_ _
� � ��<
K 1
„ z s, 4 ^. m � y ...
� k
..�..,.. , i �z�,''� �� t��
x'�
p 5,
� 9 f � '
i.
��
� c .. , . L2 � �� �"� �,a
: �`" , �. ° �,� � � � _ � _
b.� e k �'^)� 'q
'��'*%`.� Y?5..` '._ ,h _
�_ y � , . • � �'�':� -:;,u� $ �y
_ � . - i. . .
_ . ry AY .�°'`
� T
� � + n�'• P� y q� � �
� �z � �.
t
� i � " _ . ' }o. . -.. . ,.
4 (
� '°? '� EFL - _ "
x y �
.�;,�.`,�� . , .
e� a T��� . .. . _"
S� - � t
1 4' y�
,� '��' e � � ..
X
s1;5� �
��� L �
S££ •
{ �� �
y`.
�
r � -� �
� '� � " �
1 � �
�°> >� � - ,:,.
��
�. � �=
K 1� � fi f
{•
�
. .f •' b .� �
. .. .. . .. �.
— �+ .
.. � . � Y. �� y
� . , ,.v;.�`=�+4v'
�G •
..,� v ., +^ d
. � _.. _. . %_.
F ,�,q� 3 � _
�� � �T a�_ -
z_ .� - : ,
� � _ � �, . � �. . ,�„� .
, ,
_ . :„
4 ,
� � . , v. _ - '+ .
r '4 t
� � , . � ' ; ` _— ... '_- f�.
3 +.
'f
.. .. <- ._.�., . �` .<l�`�
! �
w
.. � ` =— . �`' 4 f�j y � �-�.
,� � � - � '
3 ��, � ;�
- �-_-`'-_ T,�;
- _ >� �__ �*-"�_'+
� ��� �s'€-�
�--. �` .�_ �'
x. � � ."���:.
r �` �
i � � �s ;
� a� �� ��
_ `, �
� � r � Y x �
� � �� P¢ 4 �
� ae
) �
� ��� .��� _ � . _ �
�`s..a- .."'
�—. . �
_. � �
r u :�
"{T x
Y" _
� }_
2=
�
C �
•
�
�
�
�:
0
�
0
v
rn
7
7
oa
�
m
r
0
7
�
O
H
n
O
7
�
n
N
M
N
�
d
�
�y
�
�
..
� •
�
�
'+
w
M
O
7
ru
n
O
'U
�
W
O
�
•
�
� V
�.i
r;-
�
�:
i �
q ,.
3` �.,
di .'
� .,
��� 3
' a �
� : ` �i�
#
1 �� .
$ w � ���
w
� ����;
. ,_ .,. ;�s�','
9 r <,
� f 4 ; } : ��'�� . - ? �
� . '• � g �`+� _ � .
�� L's , �i. � . .
j � �� 1 ° .-_�.
a '
.. .
. . �s ' ,k .'. a .� .
. t ..c...;..." ' _ .... , .
� , ° s
u �
Y �
x � a} _. ` �. z �� :
.�� - V ��'#� y , �#"� � �� � ^�.
}, - .. ` 's i i
�
� � � ty � �`�K } �c�� ��+ L � i'd :3
.. 4. . �'. iSY . � �s � e1�.ti:
"'r'."
�
�
^��
:
��
�
. � Lmn�.. ,�c �, _.
�''.
�' ' 'i
F
�
z
' Ct
i ,
�
.,. ;
si.i, «
:. �. � .. :,�
l
.
��
F �_
���
'v
�
� � �:�
�
�_
:`# '
M �'
i .
v .
T �L� .
y, r 6
$,
�y,.
� '
� i ��:
a , k.v'
3n .'
G:_
i,
3 .
u�`
� � .
$
A
: _y
�
#
§3
` �
� � �<,
� ... � � .. � � . ..,,;� x *,-` :
i M
� i�'
��
*v
i4. .t
3
�
. . �, � ,�*_
�.�.� ��'..,�.fi°
,. ��'�� �•� ��'`�.
, ,.
¢ ,,. . � .. , '�
4 �`
xnAfSW :.BN -� . .
-'^����. �.
{ __r.
,.. i�» z4 ..
i � `�� . _. . .
�- -
t iti'
1 ,'+'
-fc4::-s'Y'* -
�° °-
�
.�.� i;` _..
g �4_.
i
^5 . .
�
•
•
o �-y7�
�
a
�
n
�
�
r .
r+
0
�
�
�
b
y
�
m
1s
v
�
m
n
�
m
�
�.
0
7
to
m
'C
�
m
�
r.
0
�
0
n
7
�
�s
"t7
��
n
�
lq
�
�
�
�
n
0
�
n
,.
�
�*
�
n
m
^ci
0
�
�
d
f.
�
m
�.
� •
n
^c
�
�
0
�
�
n
m
'II
M
O
n
0
n
7
N
n
'c3
��
K
�
�
�
y
�"'
.
Zo
�
.
C J
�� -���
�
�
�
n
O
7
n
n
f>
r-'
fJ
n
d
'�
O
7
G
N
r*
'S
N
r+
^O
n
O
5
N
C
`G
�
N
0.
c7'
n
!)
n
w
b
y
ft
�
�
�
n
m
^O
�
O
n
O
*s
�
�
K
b
N
n
7
'c3
m
y
M
Z1
�
n
O
^CS
�
00
O
7
r*
O
�
O
n
C�
•
�
�
r*
'L3
Ys
O
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
•
C J
�trt C'. iikj a� �`+�ir:f `�'cite�
_ .�...U-. ��t ��1�� `�"�:�`
rw
N r'L•
w:a i....::a:.x,�.- . y
-rx C-�^t 4? ='r•.'. 7z�.:t 3•'J .b :^.'�.5, �:r.tar5. c.�.;_cy�e<� ot �ey_.^.CS C{� : rv^= .u�-a� : G<
d:G:,r�}.re+,str..�,@r..^r::,ra.�c' �:�inf�rc'x:_�Fa�S`re_,��y'R:sv.'�,�,�dSh�l,r._s:�
v �• 'aSc�^ a. ;`c 9Cr:Y"s'.:,', nClEdfp _�, . :-.� .r�s _. , ��
�`t�i� ESl�E'ti= Sf�' �t�l`2$fr9 C]i'_aG ] -�C � • � �
e�Eercati��., P5. _:CaS �.f sx- :-tv�'r.,L .�:-� �:ar E� .rc�rre:t or �trc cu:rcnL. de9•f�SN�: � n ts etb �
ihaL rei�s r° :.ay ir.�b��'��� C� $cm_ ti�� 555:�m �es sc a. kx c�� h.as cvr+� : a._
• -.r.
. �.: �.:.r7:.n �sa7ra 5i�.s�;' N.rS�kfar �S'J�,� F•@t Ri:tR � Y1�4 F`err'=: r�ny'.*.❑
C35 Pit E',A' � A'uE (
;
�7���°t3� V ,S?z'- , xt±?t:# {
�F`F vr- Ik � R. 'g �
� �
;
v.6 � � � '���=
� ? I
1, �
„�-,.'^` p r�c,ss
��F^n J? 23 Z :54 �
i
i
1
1
I
T�/sfi. Q?4a:' i.R'sCfLS:.:.QO f
F� P^: �+i��:.ii il.'��7' i
� or n]tl'*: 4.,: ,.x
.�,+�t� "�"* �
: ��r�9.� � r-.iiC.. . .t .r ��a;.- � ! .a'-.
d�� 1.4�,t � �
i+.�CR" FC�}2i � i'tc3 hC�e, r'r`a `- �
���
. '�d:3��s � a ii,t '.4?.' i
i
tip� 4:Y�.N� r�*_e5'r ..z}:.i�, i i
a.^,.rN Yse4'x'w. GAi"r�+� f '
a�e��v+i�r'�u�t.�°J. �
i
�.�ureiLR,`s��Jt�s': ( .
gy�c.:�t7. €�c�-trrv,�.rr pra.�t s:rt�� �
�a;�.?JT7A�E."�"�` � �`
dK�f ?'eFP3s1 � t � F �''�.
:' �:N`[t`f&' �fl4:�'.C=1t Ft:'...;•( '
� L�3rE G.: u.`ii 3G£ ����.
iF:.�Cr: rE.•'Z<;.€nm5 �
ra�szs: �t��3a:�u�+c.� ,
-:a9d'u »�bre' 3`�.'_��'�_C-u .
t�f D •':.3"=[ fl �','
ta�E'a�s. r .,�1 tt,�� ;
�.�. �" o r�r>s! .._ ��—
t34�:�'xe.n P c _ rt
�iFe C.r�•e Fa!n..�� I"i„e?iE;-4 ��•1f-,�rr
a;,�>ua GvY..e- Q$
y's;.t �aS?: �'.f'�;:'��'T"»
a�iP^C`3r*nr: Sd�+4TF°�r�; t+hci^r�f'
`,�.'_''^9.^.V 5 j
�LEAC'i�OiGild�i : < 's'�'4.i i._�
�yti.tt�� IK«S' 'f.'::L::: 5.^..:t' -
�'':.t£::itR1. �' 'tt Y'S'��:ff�; ..
� �'� ei'?":.L1s3.'. - +�-G(.�
�� �:?f
° : 3"s_
�'lrV �4w_ ��'.r_fv.SrL�^'�
i �
r�SCaE-C@{`wid?;Rj S'.4�YiY§+_ i
�'JiiS;:.�_t1�: Prc;prn��-3;r?'an _*s�._. :
2007 permit for masonry work at 1979 Summit
61-q7�
�
�
�
�
�
�
a .i. �
vu.� .- �
� �.
i�
�- r
[�'
�i-b
�
¢ ��
�§ �
� ����.
���
�
! ��
�
� ' ��
°+.^ Y
� p � 4 � x
� � w
'`w �w.v�-.c. � i
��' r � f� ` �, ..
� ` � '—.. � ?i.: . �' �:� '.�
' ? v . .
� �
$�; . .x � �,_
� � � -
.�
� .�
�^
,
r._ . ..� - s��r, t'�°.
.;
x:' = d.
�.;. .. .2 1 i. : 4 � +gqi�. y:.
; = � t ` �x ' °� ��
� ; . �; � � � a�:
� � �.�� � � � � ���#
i � : t� � . k, a� t� � � � e
> t' < 5 £ _ �" �"� � 7 � �\ '
, '} '�.�q n � `�S, L'� �
�ti i 4 ��� �� t� �
� � �- � ��� �� .
q
� aa i �ti
F � l � 'f �. `X f Y' t �T � w �'v�.i
� �
� � � �
. _ � F �� � ,. �at.���
� E §'*l '4 5 x
- !y. ` y �..
_ i,-�.�'Se�F} ���
. � - � .. . "� ,ti �� 3'>:
t' � _ .
� . �� . . . ':�'` °
�. _ .. ''a -'s
. __ — . _ .'�: Y'�.
� . .._ ' �.. � `��e�.'; �
�� ���'
� � ' '_ +,'-�j'
,� 4 �
'� '!{ f
, _"��3 �:r
'* ,
�
qj'
�i''�
.� �
' �,x
�
x j ��
u � _...'
� a
.. , � � .a%�i � ..`z
3
s � � ��.h
�„
, � �
� e . �,
�� �„
, � , � � ,
� �� ,. ,
�� =x
. ��� '�� :�;�'.
�
�����' `��
k t
� ���,: �
� �_ ��; � �
� �. �, ��;. _,�'s
� Q� � .�,� *�:
�� �„, 3 k`
V �� 3J
. . . z "F,v � . p a *.
�
. ' � �. � � .:�
� ,
. � �-Y�`- 4 ,
� � �
e �
_ y ��;�� :� `.:
�:
-i. �
f .��:
��
�.� �
y s _#�' -
�._ b Y 4
x }
�� I`- ��
t � �
sb
¢ � y �'f �"� `
K �t �
t C?_
� v
A:
i �". a � `
� yi: �
S
. � :
t � �
_ �� ; � � s
� � � bt�
� � �� �w
�P.,.� �u'�;
, �
, ��, �
r �> a �
„�
:,� ` �
�� ��� �
t
� �� ��
�! � . �::;- , . .
�a
i f ��
E
A
�� x
� i
�� '� fi ... ` `�,°
a k , � '
f .�,
1:;'
n�
� F � v
;
y A ' ° 'k
��� ,'.
4
F
° �,
; 3� ' � , " 3 ..� � �' °#�,} R� � ` � � ffiv � • �� t 9s� ��' .
!i, -v 'S� ��"+�+i � S ° - t � $- a � � T i-: �
y " . _�#" "�s a � `� � + s
- r ° ��}� � - l `' � �`��..��- � <' ,�� �� "�� ��i +:.
k �� � � p ��� � � .
�;�* ' t�' � �`" � .�' � �.` . }" r.'� '�r � � �
„� � �+ � 5� .a, S pY� � � � l��t ': � � �` .-_
� ✓ � y Irz � k � � 5' F i `_
� �ti� i t � {j � .�.�4 .9" � �i�� - �� ���� 3 .f .
F "� 7 # 7 ,,. �� Y 1 � F'_� z i �i
� �� y� P S* cr'� � E � a� � v ��,�' ?,
� � tz v �� �,. �. � x $ .3 r ' c.
. r �: }� , t i1 � � ,�' t �"''� '�� � :� "3� � � � 4 ` ` { ¢,{y' s
' � � �. � � . �t � at' � � � �� � � . .�,. � � �� � �#
t �� - t .a r _ i J �� e a u�' xf'c ", �: s`F A .� _� � r-a s=.
F r �
'.F s�� .A i+t A. Z : � � � A �4. '�i
� } R ' Y.-'�, , xd� �'$ F{ a,� . .� A' � � � � a a p �� } : � -
+� a s ' 4 . j r a`"t ` . k � c {Y � a � R� � '�', � �''�`'� "� �%r '4 .Y`�`�:.. �^' J
f _ T . r .� Z � . ��.�`�•� '
t �+ �?,
�� �. :�,- o =�'� � t n � �,H� s ��' a e � a -� _'1�'��,,������ _�a
r � �L �a £:Y^� }� i�t � ti �`+..: �„� 4 �+ v � �, �F�, � . . Y-0i ,,,
X ; �
1 L X �
� y x. �� ��,���i-� t� ��'� R .,� ,: �z S '� ��` �` -� °s 3, .
X � a �i
� a`�" � ,� �'" �� � � �` `� � � �,� � � � �- *�
� �< � �a f£��� ' $�� #"�� � ��7� "�`'� �`� s�$
�" `� �. *�� , � . � .� y
x
�� ���-:� �t � J e, 4 ',�,.> '�`. °�� e�- -�er
�� s - s �'
�� �� _^ r �:'d'�. �a ;+�,� �_ '� ���o
.. � ���
�r� Y� fi�. ai5: ' � li� , � 3
�
�'4a r 5 �'�' � , x - .?��.� � �� r r
,
� e
� �� ; ""�'" s �
�
F � �5 � �;
� ��
. +- ".�p ��. �•
� � ��
� �.. 'i �..�i i } ` ��+ � - .
� ; ` 3 i � _ �
�. .;= , _ -. . .' , �; r � :
i ��
c�
�.=
��
fi=
�
. �,� �-; ` , �.iz �.b
� — * ` s� �'��`�
� ��� _ "` �: �'�s�
r t�� �
� ' � � ����#J
:,�.:
�
�
�v �
� >
� � �, ,
�� , � �
6'
1 $��
r__
. . -. . LL _r �� �X.4
�' : 5
� , . •�� . .SS�d
; °�
, . . �1� a �+'�'i
:c l+
'P /?
; � � M
t:._ t ��
f r � .!• ..
... _ .._ , �`
�
��
.. -- � ' :�- i -? Y -
� '% � � ::. � -' '�• � i � _
_ r ,r . � �-a '
}�- .. 4 .� ; }' ��± i . a � �� s
� � s
_. - ..
�+ ' ' i ��
u�
. _ 1 ' �' .':; -� a � � -..
7: y � €3 �� .' '�:
, � � �=
4 ,'���g
� `
..�„ - - .
` r: -4t i r t,�-
`3 r. r y � i ,s
' -- t f �. �j s. �,. �'S'. ' . .. i �, s :°`
� - .: i�"""��'� � " ; S '� �K.eF3,
_- . a Ii . �.�; d� '? �"
_�. � i ,�� *, .� s
.� . _ . . � � � ��_;�
.`'��Jy -..
� 7 Y ' � s4. � : e °34
� �, .. t :. �'� ' ' i l
4 � r . . . , 4 - . « �� `5 . i<t �����
� - - � �` k4 � , . ;� �
, . ,� _ � ,�, .
� � r . �
� �� Lj` . '�' ,F:�`r 5r� t { K1 �
� . ,�,� . . ,lF�. i 1. � 6 � x 1 `,�F �3�3 �� a � �"t
� � � y � {�5�� es c ��i.``;-
y � �. � a .. q � ` K Y � � J � A •
�: �. � � . f.0 � y`F .�' y '. ? �
� T � ,,�� f'e F. : :n �'�e
; j
�v/ �i` y' i ? � L 4 �� ' f ��t t �,. ��f't
� s'3�'. � a '� �� 4,
�� � � ; � � ti��
� ��" .� �' � "" ,�-�
� � � p n
� ' � � � . ��� ��f;�� �
� a ,� ` . ` ��;,,� � r
� ���t �
� � : � ��°---� t �
f :.;dR ✓ .�b y- a "N �? y '�� . � � s "----.*r^ -, , � � , ° �
� 1 : � � q `s : D� ��a� � � � �' �� �y � �` Q
� >.' ��� `�c<p- 4 ,i a ys_, �„�, .F�,R� 1 �
�S ` "3 `i • �+" �S� �� -� e � _ ��. � # � �
` �� .
Y : �� a x ��' � � ���� `�'`s� �' x. ��^"
�
`�� •� ��x a"* � '- �s � .1 s" � *�4. �, ~ �• K
���` 3 �M� � ry e;s 4 £+ . �.
.,.. � ah 4 . . p � p ' ' . ,�
x� � � c � � > q� .d,�. v
s 3
1 �' , y , �. t j ` .
; � r^f � � �, ,� � �x. � : S <
� � � � x '` ' � �' ' . � , � °' a
a e�
_ , .� _ �—_...� � �a. e�.�r� �
� � ��� � ����� �,
i �
��*° � " -u�� ��� :
� „��...._.. S �R � 3 y r . �'� � }'� ' `S S 2 4
T . .��' ��{
>, �' �" F y ' i t ; : , , . . `s ;
S *
�, "'3�.m � �' 3 ?�` v� �x
� � � "��'.� �
���� � {� ,A
� �
f �. ' y �' s
� ,a�,.` Y, .�`dy���` �1' Y , ' 3� �� �Y � ;;: �`_a..
M' � t t v � L ��
' � i ,,� � ' � `t
¢ ° �� +� +��
. F _ : • a . . ��. ,�i�� �
" , y� .. �. :, � ` ` � �'���� :�� �. _
' . � � _ _ ,��.e?\" F ',�; _
1' .s
� . ' _ ' - � _ =-<:�" .
� � � �;; � � :.. . . � . �.+ �`�a' . '-z.
"�
� � � . - ��.�€ ; �� � -
> y ,
, _ ,. "�' y ,��.,',�� , - ��.a, °_
— � r '�
. ._ � �' .' L _ � � .. "��sk�'• j`�**3,,, ai, : ,
� -
�•,*- ;`� e.��.i�.'^�§'..'.�'+ms.�-''�a �"'' - • e x # '- "�`` �e
�,. . " ... `�.-ave .. ,_ _ ..s . . .,�«,_ `-�
...�.�.,_ s . . �„ ' _� ` �.Y('
� � s ., - . � :�,+� ` . �� _j,�
� � - , .
a �, " '
s � �g
� 3 �S'�
� `Y� � �
� " � '� �` �'`.± �:
t � �;, �; � _ � '_� � �
� � _ � -"-'� . �. _ ' � - - �"� -i
- �. . _ - ' _ tr . ���� _
-_ � . .'.�� i T St .
4 . .v1 }
. • 4 . . ' .. �Y
.. � ..� _ � � _
T�
. � r '_"'±��{5�.� \' }�''- y .��
i < �4. ?a� ! x � Y � ��� . �
, 'q ' � .. y-a: � #-y �.l.:.. . ��
' � i ` a_�„ l aF.
� ry :' c � ' k a ��;$' "° _
� � . �t b ' Y t+ r ',� L �_ ^ . t
�� � th L * ; ���} .d
� � I X
�E E ) � <
'� ) j H § `a� .�''F�
� � Y' S � §
�� . � ��� . �
3�� � � -�
_ � �� � r � � , •�;. ;� � � �� ,..,
_ � � £ : ; 3 � � }�
� ��.. .
� � �� � �
� _ } , .. -' ..,..-j �
� �
;{ Y �� ���.v
Sr S k '
`a: � . �-� �,-�.
� „ ,i ��
'� r< � � 3'� '
;'
� � , � �
� ..� � y� �� �{,..
a� ' v..__� y ���..
� i
� . . .�� ..... . _ �
S i �
r
�
� �.
k
�. �i. F �� � � � � 2 � �
Y f �A. r � r F. F
u�e. � �. � . . . � i -� * • � _ ;
6 ! � "_�' � Y �4 � �+�, '
s�7 ;� w;. ' � ,!�
� � � !� .. _. ` �. {� !.. .
a i . t� ,__.. -�` S ` ..���. 1 � ..
. .`{ h �- t .� . �' _ a �..
�� +) � : - -� � "..
T j f 4'
Y � �.& ; f � � y�, '_ :" f .
�� � 3 r � � .� �>, . ,�,a- � :
� '�� �. .....� �w '`�`• "' { � ' k ''�
� �
��
Y ' � , � �_ � -�: i' �3 _ �'' �� , '°• � ^•�.� '?3i�`:
K f M. � y
� YS 1 �.k � � ' d cY'�� 4.,
i_'. .<. i�' '� . � ' . . � .
_ S � $ "- i � ' - ' ' � N
�� � 4 �l: . � .
' � y � ' � �+. . � ���
Y i 4 � . i '�. . �. y
� j i .� Y . �`l
o � =+z ° �`:. 3 � S�
• . _ ' , _ - 4;
t �
.� y � '
� � 4 f .f ` � . � . , � ,
u .: . 1 a
b n
_ "�, . z � . ' ;�A- r�'T+.� �� d±
�3 � s 4 �� � • s� . '� � , a�y'1�� ; '
� + e - � s.. �?� .g
� 5 �+ ��d ' �$., . " a.. - � i�_._
,,. i r f i1.` c 4 a.. - ` •:i - � � ^�<_t 4, a.. i. ,
` � /
e �
S
- :- ' � '� �� �� � �
� � � 4 � d.:��' f r��.
* Yi. ( �s
� � '
�.
e �- - � � r � � � �- �'} �¢ b � � -
.... f i 'L- d 2
, j 1'3 �� f.�"ru}- S��pfe'��¢�'�
t.. ,� ;3!'.Y �.�'_� t� r�_*.Si_°��.� �A�'" 4 4 £ta���
�t
� 'i
� Y � �- �� c > �it ��.* �n ..
�` ..� �' � } t " �� t 7 � � �� ���`_°-_
X
. . . �� ���' f � � .� ,^: s i TM:�,� �
� �.. � #, ti 4 Y SY.
� � ! `� . •�� n 4 �`'ti
, y +i9 yy £ ,� 4` � •
� . 4 � '�y . � 'n T :;
�+�9l�"t x � t '� ' e
. � � y , - d . �l ! q 2 � 3 3 ��,�"
- ��j �_ ��` � � — . }��� { #�' �+Y
3 '
e
eS...� � _ � � �, ,. �'� � � �l- F- c ;'.
+� � 3 i: ''� f �`
ry.., .
s ' t �
� ' �+`�. +�t w.� � � �..
. .�u < � � — � � .� .
- �' � � �`� ; � � � � �
:� a - Z� � . r , 4-tr,� t ;
: �sF
u� . . � � � ��� *
' � € '
� .`
�
'���+'vs �__ i �au . mP'T
u� � i _
�'��
�� : �
r''T � µ' `. .. +¢ �'4 �94 ,-'.�.�
�4
p - � � �b .� �S ♦ 1� "t5,.,¢.�,
� . .i a 1 .� :, ( R 1 �R T�
.�� $r � e a� 9�,. S', Y '.
�, �" . � � �� � � � #� e '�.
�? � �, .�� � .
� � � �''��` ��` � °$� a�� ,
��',� � � � `m° �. : 11 k£� � A'�
-e , r�.�. �� .. k p� V �,' a
� i"sF . ,�,� � �: ,�e
'��'`� , � � '.�,�,��d ,.,�" �" i u vp, .,
� �
s, , m ° �
,q re� T � i # : �
� ` � i _ . ... L F' r f . � <T , . M s
- f � �
i rt^
� C � . . . �� � � W . ���,� d
M+
�s� °'nm�"'` Yff(,�i� ��il�
�.r . L *^ F'Fe�.'..vaa� �'�� �V '3 �fi .
�5"� t
" �'�. 4 6 6 �� '�.� S� y3
�° e
z � ry � �� ��� ��
_. � � T �
. _ �� �'� � - b
yh '. "��3
�� i b, � �"um� $nti '
'w `: s� *� � E � �-d g � , �
. . '�l '�� . ,. ��� � � '
, �� ;s < �3 . .Y.'x� a� t �. "` rv � g
ve 3 -`w`a3�`g��'��k.�r� d�.�� ��� z�,. � � �� � � s q �'''^ s
�
; �
� � � � � � � 4
"
�:.i _ ��, �,� " - - '.�� _ ``� -s..*-' 3c°
; _ �t,
�,� `�,,.�� � �,
�� ��`� °` � � ,� � �
_ ,,
� � ;, � �, a��� �
. � r� .
, o_
�° � �" � n �. r .` -� '
a� � t , � �
�� � "`% t� � z = $a,� . . .����
� �s�� t � £ .� ::
-� � '- ` y � ` c. �"� . . �
�
� � ., � . ��- � .� �" � '� .
, � � �� �
�
4�� > � `� � ' '
� �� �� s# �Z ` � °
�a� � ; :,� � Y �
, � � � -` �
a z� ��',�-«�� „ �� � �� -
- , ^� ,?
z
'� ' a '�?'�
-- _ :
,
w
L �, �
� i �.
� � g � _ � -° ' �
e _. � _ � ,
� : „ ,.,,..:, .: .`, �, ,.r .•x•� � , �' , ,_ .,--: °� . � :: i `�
C�
�
.�
�
n
N�
G
�
R
�
�
�
,` 1
u
�
n
O
7
r+
�
�
M
n
�
•
3n
4 3^�
�� �
. - 5 . x l '�"� = a6 � t �• j:, .
. � .. . � -' ,� s � � � �°� ar �
� � °'�t :� � "���-.�` '� a �'�°
' F � # � ,S 'F3 R � ,,:s* � p r
v � �� �.. } yi
y .. " i 4�.� ` �. 4 ,Y - e �x,Y t '.
:} � - -*a�.�. `.� � ' � � *,'-:
�t ' �� '�j ,tX- .�r
0 [
�.
°� 3 ` 4 � _ E _ _ \��"� � ��:
X � ((.�'�(-�' 4 ����at`.
. k _ . ��a���5 �'� - � 4- �k
_ �:E .°F,�: R Yi. � ��# ti .� .� ,
:_� ^v� _. � -� .r. n=
t � : 3 • ' f ,� `� , AG�� ! +!� �.
�' . ' � _ � ,j. � �r �� 4 � '
s . � �t4�3 y r y � � ,
.� �Su L £�y.. 4 ,�n ��.
e ` �� � �' 'T _ s S � .n�'e.
k _': "i � f _ 'y`s�
� �°. � � .',� 5 �` _
_ � ,� � � i�s"y' ; ,��
� ."D : % -y5 ` i 'N " - y➢ a i.
tr . >
:� ��
. � � q y T' �Y� ,
i ' ' +{ � ! �� -
�l � <L
� � yq} 4e ga
b �� {� � . �t �i' C� ,`� .
IY Z ' R`¢. ' .:
'� s5 3��, ��, ✓ v 4 �.. "' 3�*Y .. � �''`. � ° E : ±�
: r �
_ � ., � � �"� � 5 '
z
��
� � ,. � ' � i � � � �
W R � �
K ?'�l (� `` � '. dd'�r��b`: 'iA ,�&� �
�� ' X
4 n �. .�s. � `
��ifu �t _ �� �� �Y L�_
� � � � �
t � � � Y x
� �� �
%� ' £
re � �xm �, °" •> .� �z �£ �$ " �! 5 ��
�,�`*?t ". �. i� n s� , 2 -
,`3 �� �;`,��. n �j , `� : - ,:� �
� ro a. � s n '*s � ,.
7 , k _ u ,;. �,. �.,.,...�.-. „ �_.. r .., s ;'
��,. � b� ,�,
. � �� � � � �� � � �
i 3 g �p �
3
b '� $'� � 3�µ.�' �+{9+'�ip � z f a
' .�r E ��t'��d'�� � � �� .
�
� N f *:-�'� v ..s
<� ?: t
�� �. � � �
� ��������� � : �
K��. � � � �C' , = ��`� $
2�'
✓� � T, � ' ^�� . rz �.'
�,� '�,+�.. r ✓
�* � ;� ` � � �,, � �'' �
�
�, �:� '� ,' � �` � � „ t
�+.°�g �€g�^�' e _
F
i �����+� ` ��� �� � �' Y�. .�' �
§z FA ��� '� ` ' y a�" +a "'m-IS:,'. �' ..
� % � `.
. ,} �� e � ," ' Y C `� �t ..
' 41� . �5£55 ' �� .
2". vY�'"tt 1' � , �' x .,�2
v3 � `�.� � �; .,� ' � �'�,, y � h a. -
n _
..P%.3'� ., �» , , v.; �`.�-�t.
� F ec
� .: t ° 'S ,` .*�` ^" . nc• �� . r
a "3 v ' :. { ^�ry.k "!"� . ...,vc.m�'- ., _ __ _
� � � m
�.:�� � ����� °:
' a 4 ; '"��" "��- � xs�;r� �„ :- �;
, , � , . » �:�-<.
� � ._ . _
� ,: � -
�� ,
B11 �
" � j �`� �,�. �:. '` � ' � �-
. ... < ' . v. .. . . , `r��'
Y
IA
c
w
•
�
0
..
n
�
.
.
�
�•��� � y� �;
�` �' _ � �
i �
� ' =��- �- °��� ' . a �, ' s. �'€�
� ; _ , ` ° �
� `���.' r; � '(
�� ���. �. ..
x ?' � s :t�
� '� �� uF' ���� � � ����� ��
i �" r
4 �' v
� • � ��»
�� s '�'. '�� d`� � -k ��£�� r
Lm.n.,..,. „ � Ls �. J�
i` 3
_ _ ' �.. � ';;y: _.. cyy,
� - ,n >
z r� -. "`'�5 t s.� � 3
7 q <
x �.� t�
� �,, �� � � s�
�- ,� � �--, � ,� �, � � � � � r�„. —
, t t � �._�,�
J
�4� 7 vY� - d. s y e"'
1 .+ : vt`, $ :
� 3 '� • � ;- � � ,,.,� .il""
�, �, k � � �. �� �N✓ ��'����"'� � � '�
, � :rs � F �s � ti �. •
Y � � q .,. � �h
� 'M; '" � • � q �"��'`��'��'4.,�n1 a� v
-"'�' a ' " ^: ' ,,,,�5 �rf�r,y'���
� fi � f46 W `��i .
� � � � #
x Y � ¢�� � ������ ��
{$
� ` � y„} ���y5§�vs . � d .
� m�,'�j-'� ¢ fee�.a� p' � ��
- � j �]� 'z
� � � .. �. i . � �� � ,
J
�.. ... ffi. ,'x^ t4
.:<E� . .✓, i ` &
' gw Y
9"'M�
`Zi. %�,� . � � �IE�� . ✓ ^e'L�.+4 ?��'i.
�� i.
1
q :
, sriye°31�i�� '='e
.. .., ,?,_`z..'mLs.
� �
` f� �
�,�.
� - e
� .
.a '` �, '.
� �� ,
t � * �
� � � y tl
� �i... f §+w' �.;
�y,
iir 4
, �
� � • '� �
a
. y
/
FY���
w
M
1`: {
• ;� . �� 4 _ '
'''' rar
�� ��
� � D �x
. �' ..
u
�
�
a
�
�
n
�
�
w
y
m
�
0�
m
�s
�e
�
Oq
�
�
N
� .
M
O
w
G
�
co
�
r *
�
7
r
n
�
W
�
�
3 `�
6 ����
�
�
�
1921 Plan Book by J. W. Lindstrom, who designed the applicant house at 1760 Summit Avenue which
�vas built in 1922
3�'
�
, . _ , ... t..�,�s:p; �� tfi4
3P� (,I.n t... ,4_._, ,- .i �d a 8�.a.r Fixt a¢!v ar c�v��iu1 1I[an�-nce- i ,..s -. ., in alu`7
x¢t+.`I .: Fr.._ �G .;.y°..�en,.?,.k�. I.e.i,na�.�a!! $.ve[.�Ie;�T i!o- :.trsn.[ a�tL �h� p:.••. x�
f�[TF �a,. 1..-r ni ,
x 1�+�.
G'ri.�t �- �.. r,. i!� iir.c . x,nd,e. aL. acro�. �k;- ss...«r ar..l ,F:: i)�: �.�ut.t ,.e �s, ... �, -, � M�
�'� �. ,� r �,. ..,rt�.. ,..1�;r,:. _rt_,�t S1�e i:.ss�f �..I�a;.- el�. �nai+: r�.,[ i. ^. .-.. _�•
, n eFx i t �.� TI , ir.�ta.f�. .tl.i , � .. � _ , ._.�,�. k�tihem�
.4 lL.cd..i �. �F x'�aia. r 4 w E� . n.qGmf ONi i '=. • . T• .. !��i .rt.k i'nr1�i
n.�c t�,� r.. �.� � t. �'. .. .�. I'f.. F�il'snce of 1!x ':a. .i.. �c .. r sr-,w...�r? ..F' ��. � . - 1 •
a�cm- o ,. J !e._ ,. r�., iw. 2..�,.;v.i?r ��cL1iRL p1s�� e o �b.. fi. c a . �I.
�t^S"'...s'�!
Ue� ah - ! t�k. p. �i
.���:� ,�.�,�,.�, �,.t at
�;3Qh f.5.tiri <na� e�: ..(
�:eciu�tra;ean... i5a9 7h�.e
at£� nf pi�nr ]�.1 tW,a5f3�
lazHfi. $�.UfA
r e.va.ur.e °
�� F I
1�.�/tt�{���a K � ' �" I ��
,a- �,�t d �•.. .a
�
�� �
_�a"1.�'
� . .
i,� � -.:�:�.
'� a ...-w.� `
�j`��� 1
�.�i .°-G�3� . i
s� „ . < j
... �i
� u`a, e � 'a
�,� �.
r
� , 4 . .. ' -�1 . �
�Si'�?L{CaP.
eC; }'t ��'�
..a�iu-.+'�` t'
_ �L�� a�� a..
_ __m��.� _ l.(..�� kv�Y' .Y . a
�_.. �—
y 4_.._.. . ._i...
� Eax`i
a 5�
fi t= rAia7-eus�
Residential building from Lindstrom plan book �vith front entry pott h neazly identical to the one
proposed. (Same architect as app&cant residence, which �vas built zn 1922; plan shown here is from
1921.)
i
�
3�
�s�s�cN r�c�. e;a
�c.+s�nrx t=1x�a sadre tna.
��-q��
•
.
�
0
�
a
�
,
;
,
�
�
�
� rtV�
����
3
[ar(,�
�tT i�$
{GI��iY
�r*<prP
3
�tii��+en
q5p�rfF
M! �tt
tal�s�•1
tw�cian
p�a` s�'
Ar1[9zl�i�
ri4f ifl��
e.c u�
o�s��:�v �€?. s;c
,, v.. a �., ..�r�. t �f.
I�� �.,..�..-�i .3� .1...�r_�� r. �.�.Grprcu3 viec�rn�.rE
A� .-G:%..1 •� . 1. •�{.a x.r.. i.ar=i a�( a�vGe fieb
�arn 6l.lrt++# 1 ^ i+�'�' ' .: '�r �. 'i{'NCk51lL. P}S' =�
c�u�Tr.l ..i.i' � �. :� .• i� �: y�n�{C' N�.s qw
Ls 4�. i»; ,..s.. .,, .... .,.s,_ rt .�vir. e�p:eiril;+
.R sl,�� ��.. ., � . . .. .�• .g.,.n s . 34ti.a,4
r„-t3r t 1-im .. a. _.�... iN ad? nrn-r 9c2t nr?I.
i n.r� �e.:, �. K �., t, k: _ �.i. u f.- , rr IPm— Ra�W. ui
��i;e
��inxaCe>I �a P� �a» 1}.�ao� wil! vvM�tp
`@twi� fo-r:a.. ,�...
;t , m:p?. , Ro 1 -.. - � . „ �nt+ , IrIJ1'r wi44 .a:tia:�
yu,sts�t �is��. ... _ , �d-. ,. .-�l+,�br � , t�», .
a� -vi �,t °.1<.p... �_ , ...�oiit+-S +I'aHint� anl
,'��. ,�,�.rn� .�,.,= ,._�._ i,'n�€� 'fl�m,� -rr. o€
V[a.;t i.., .� ., i: , �i . � - ?' : �
ar•� _ .
� F:d°T�GtlP .
�'� '� � e.
�
I
t
f
.�
y,
Jn
�
i
�
L
S'4te mtA
�
Residential building £rom Lindstrom plan book with small entry porch at side of front elevation—
shows deviation from what one would typically eacpect to find. (Same azchitect as applicant residence,
which was built in 1922; plan sho�vn here is from 1921.)
3�-
Agenda Item N.D.
HPC File #07-179
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT �
FILE NAME: 1760 Summit Avenue
DATE OF APPLICATION: May 7, 2007
APPLICANT: David Heide Design Studio, Mark Nelson
OWNER(S): Paul Padratzik & Debra Asplund
DATE OF HEARING: May 24, 2007
HPC SITE/DISTRiCT: Summit West Historic District
CATEGORY: contributing
CLASSIFICATION: building permit
STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: Amy Spong
DATE: May 17, 2007
A. SITE DESCRTPTION:
The Mrs. Mae Weiss Fox House is a 2'/z story Prairie style house that was constructed in 1922. The
house has a low pitched hipped roof, stucco walls and rough brown brick trim around first story
windows and front entrance. The plan is L-shaped. The brick is tabbed and soldiez coursed around
the large first story window sets. The front entrance is open and curviiinear in roof shape with
nanow sidelights. Windows aze casements and 6 over 1. Soff'its are metal. There is a contributing
red brick retaining wall with brick coping. The rear gazage is also contributing.
B. PROPOSED CHANGES:
The applicant is proposing the fotlowing items: �
1. Replace existing front retaining wall, walkway, and steps. The retaining wall has a brick
coping and the applicant is proposing to install a limestone cap instead. According to the
applicant the brick edging on the sidewalk does not appear original and it is not proposed to
be replaced.
2. Widen existing driveway from 10 feet to 12 feet.
3. RebuiId front entry, using same footprint but adding a porch roof with support coIumns.
4. Construct a small two-story addition at the southwest (rear) corner of the house.
5. Consriuct a one-story addition at the southeast (side and rear) corner of the house. Both
additions would require the removal of original windows with brick surt brick and
stucco walls, and some older railings (unclear if original).
6. Replace the three existing wood exterior doors with similar design.
C. Gi7IDELINE CITATIONS:
The Secretar� ofthe Inlerior's Standards fnr Rehabiliiation:
1. A properly x�ill be used as it was hislorically or be given a new use that requires minimal changes ta i1s
disrinctive materials, features, spaces, and spaZial relationships.
2. 17se historic character of a properYy will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive
materials or alteration offeatures, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will
8e avoided.
3. Each properfy wi11 be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use, Changes that create
a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other
historic properties, will not be undertaken. •
4. Changes to a property that have acguired historic significance in their own right will be retained and
preserved.
38
o �-9�
Agenda Item IV.D.
HPC File #07-179
.i. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques ar examples ofcrafLrmanship that
chnracterize a properry wi[I be preserved.
� 6. Deteriorated historic fearures will be repaired rather than rep[aced. Where the severity of
deterioration requires replacensent of a distinctive fean�re, the new feature will match the old in
design, color, texture, and, tivhere possible, materials. Replacentent of missing features jvill be
substantiated by documentary and physical evidence.
7. Chemical or physical treatnsents, ifappropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible.
Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will nod be used.
8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. Ijsuch resources naust be disturbed,
mitigation measures will be undertaken.
9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic matertals,
features, and spatial relationships thad characterize a properry. The new work shall be differentiated
frorn the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion,
and massing to protect the integriry of the property and ats environment.
10 New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken zn such a manner that, af
removed in tTze future, the essential form and integrity ofthe historic properry and its environnaent
would be unimpaired.
Summit Avenue West Desien Guidelines
Resioration and Rehabilitution
General Principles
1. All work should be of a charaeter and gualiry that maintains the distinguishing features of the building
and the environment. The removnl or alteration of dastinctive architectural features should be
anoided.
2. Deteriorated architectural features should be repaired rather than replaced whenever possible In the
• event of replacement, vaew materaals should match the oraginal in composition, design, color, texture
and apyearance. Dupllcation of original design based on physical or pictorial evidence is preferable
to using conjectural of 'period" designs or using parts of other buildings.
3. Distinctive stylistic features or examples ofskilled craftsmanship characteristic ofstructures or a
periad should be treated with sensitiviry.
4. Buildings should be used for their origanally intended purpose or compatible uses which requare
minimum alteration of the building and its site.
.i. In general, buildings shauld be restored to their original aypearance. However, a[terations to
buildangs since their construction are sometimes signafzcant because they reflect the history of the
building and neighborhood This significance should be respected, and restoration to an "original"
appearance may not be desirable in some cases. All huildings should be recognized as�roducts of
their own time and not be altered to resemble buildings from an earlier era.
6. Whenever possible, new additions or alterations to structures should be done an such a manner that if
such additions or alterations were to be remooed in the future, the essential form and integriry of the
structure would be unimpaired.
Roofs and Chimneys
Original roofing materials should be retained untess deteriorated. When partially reroofing, deteriorated roof
coverings should be replaced with new materials that match the old in composition, size, shape and texture.
When entirely reroofng, new materials rovhich differ to such an extentfrom the old in composition, size, shape,
color or texture that the appearance of the building is altered should not be used. The predontinant roof
materaals on west Summit are tile and asphalt shingles Tile Yoofs are either red or green, generally to
complement rather than match the color of the house. When asphalt shingles began to be used in the 1890s
• and early hventieth century, the mast common colors were solid, uniform, deep red and solid, uniform, dark
green, Dark brown, dark gray and a weathered-wood color may also be acceptable for new asphalt shingles,
and blaek may be acceptable for Colonial Revival houses built after fhe 1920s.
39
Agenda Item 1V.D.
HPC File #07-179
TJze original rooftype, slope, and overhangs should be preserved. The slsape ofexistingdormers sJsould also
be preserved. New dormers may be acceptable in same cases ifcompatible with the originai design. Modern •
skylights are a simple way to alter a roof to admit light and air withoui disrupting its plane surface, are less
noticeabte than dormers, and may also be acceptable. Sky(ights should be flat and as close to the roofplane as
possible. They should not be placed on the front roofplane.
Chimneys should be restored to their original condition, In the absence ofhistorical documentation on the
original design, chimney design shauld be in keeping with the period and style of the building
Windaws and Doors
Existing window and door openings should be retained. New window and door openings should not be
introduced into principal elevations. Enlarging or reducing window or door openings to fit stock window sash
or new stock door sizes should not be done. The size of window panes or sash shauld not be altered. Such
changes destroy the scale and proportion of the building.
Window sash, glass, lintels, si11s, architraves, doors, pediments, hoods, steps and all hardware should be
retained. Discarding original doors and door hardware, when they can be repaired and reused in place,
should 8e avoided.
The stylistic period(s) a building represents should be respected. If replacement ofwindow sash or doors is
necessary, the replacement should duplicate the material, design and hardware ofthe older window sash or
door, Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum storm and screen window
combinations, plastic ar metnl strip awnings, or fake shutJers that disturb the character and appearance ofthe
building should not be used. Combination slorm windows should have ivood frames or be painted to match
trim colors.
Exterior Architectural Features
Porches and steps which are appropriate to the building and its development should be maintained or
restored. Porches and steps removed from the buildingshould be reconstructed to be compatible in design and
detail with the period and style of the building. In general, frontporches should not be enclosed, and precast
steps should be avoided
Decorative architectural feafures such as cornices, brackets, railings, and those around front doors ar�d
windows should be preserved. New material used to repair or replace, where necessary, deteriorated
architectural features ofwood, iron, cast iron, terra-cotta, tile and brick should match the origina! as c(osely
as possible.
Shutters should not be used on buildings not designed for them. Ifused, they should be large enough to cover
the entire windaw area, should be funciional and aperable, and shoudd not look as if they were flat-mounted
on the wall. 4. Deck and firestair additions may be acceptable in some cases, but should be kept to the rear of
buitdings where they wi11 be the most inconspicuous and delract the least from the historical context. The
detailing ofdecks and exterior stairs shouZd be compatible with the period and style of the building.
New Construction
L
General Principles
The basic principle for new construction in the Summit Avenue West District is to maintain the scale and
quality ofdesign of the district. The Summit Avenue West Distric[ is architecturally diverse within an overall
pattern ofharmony and continuity. These guidelines for new construction focus on general rather than spec�c
design elements in order to encourage architectural innovation and qualizy design rovhile maintafning the �
harmony and continuity of the district Netiv construction shouZd be compatible with the size, scale, massing,
height, rhythm, setback, color, material, building elements, site design, and character of surraunding
"l�
L �/� f�
Agenda Item IV.D.
HPC File #07-179
structures and the area.
• Massing and Scale
New construction should conform to the massing, volume, height, facade proportions and scale of existing
surrounding structures. The scale of tke spaces between buiidirzgs and rhe rhythm ofbuildings to open space
should also be carefully considered. New houses should be at [east 2� feer high and relare to the height of
existing adjacent houses. New coltege buildings should retate to nearby contributing college buildings, new
college buildings with a smaller setback from Summit should have a correspondingly lower height.
Materials and Details
i�ariety in the use ofarchitectural materials and details adds to the intdmacy and visual delight ofthe district.
But there is also an overall thread of continuary provided by the range of materials commonly used along
Summit and by the way these materia[s are used. This thread ofcontinuiry is threatened by the introduction of
new industrial materials and the aggressive exposure of earlier materials such as concrete block, metal
framing, andglass. The materials anddetails ofnew construction shouldrelate to the materaals anddetails of
existing nearby buildings
Most buildings on Summit are built ofhigh-quadsty materials, aften with brick or stucco walls and aspkalt or
tile roofs. Most brick is red and tile roofs are either red or green. Vinyl, metal or hardboard sading is
acceptable only for accessory structures which are not visible from Summit. Imitative materiats such as
artificaal stone and art�cial brick veneer should not be used. Materials will be revaewed to determine their
appropriate use in relation to the overall design of the structure
The materials and details of new college buildings should relate to the materiais and details of nearby
contributing college buitdings. The Macalesfer College campus has buildings predominantly ofred brickwith
� concrete or sandstone trim. The [UniversityJ ofSt. Thomas presents cream-colored Kasota stone buildings to
the Summit Avenue streetscape.
The color of materials should relate to surrounding structures and the area as well as to the style of the
structure. Buildingpermits are nat requiredfoYpatntingand, although the Xeritage Preservation Commission
may review and comment on paint color, paint color is not subject to Heritage Preservafion Commissfon
approval.
Building Elements
Individual elements of a bui[ding shouZd be integrated into its composition for a balanced and eomplete
design These elements of new construction should compliment existing adjacent structures as well.
Roofs
There is a great variery of roof treatment along Summit, but gable and hipped roofs are most common. The
skyline or profile of new construction should relate to the predominant roof shape of existing nearby
buildings.
The recommended roofpitch for gable roofs is 9:12 and in gener�al the minimum appropriate pitch is 8:1?
Highly visible seeondary strueture roofs should matck the roofpitch of the rnain structure .A 6:12 pitch may
be acceptable in some cases for secondary structures which are not visible from the street
Roofhardware such as skylights, vents, and metal pipe chimneys should not be placed on thefront roofplane.
Windows and Doors
• The proportion, size, rhythm and detailing ofwindows and doors should be compatible with tTiat ofexisting
nearby buitdings. Facade openings of the same general size as zhose in nearby buildings are encouraged.
Stiding windows, awning windows, and horizontalty oriented muntins are not common in the district and are
�1
Agenda Item IV.D.
HPC File #07-179
generally unacceptable. Uertical muntins and muntin grids may be acceptable when compatible with the
period and style of the building. Sliding glass doors should not be used where they would be visible from the �
street.
.4lthaugh not usually improving the appearance ofa building, the use of inetal windows or doors need not
necessarily ruin it. The important thing is that they shoufd Iook [ike part ofthe building and not like raw metal
appliances. AppropriaYely colored bronze-toned aluminum is acceptable. Millfinish (silver) aluminum should
be avoided.
Parcl:es and Deeks
Front entrance ways shouZd be articulated with a suitable design element to provide a transitionat zone
betrveen the publzc outdoors and the private interior, and should be appropriate in detail to the size and style
of the building. Iffront porches are constructed, rhey should generally nat be enclosed
Decks should be kept to the rear ofthe buildings, should be visuallyrefzned, and should be integrated into the
overall building design. Ef raised deck protrudingfrom a single wall usuaZly appears disjointed from the tota[
design and is generally unaccepiable.
D. FINDINGS:
1. The property is considered contributing to the chazacter of both local and National Register
Summit Avenue West Historic Districts.
2. The greatest ckanges proposed that will require the loss of character defining features are the
front entry changes, the brick retaining wall and the infilling of the L-shaped plan with the one-
story addition. Two of the changes are at the fronf of the property very visible from the avenue
and the addition is at the side and rear which is minimally visible. The guidelines state
"decorative architectural features such as cornices, brackets, railings, and those aroundfront .
doors and windows should be preserved" and "All work should be of a character and quality that
maintains the distinguishing features of the building and the environment. The removal or
alteration of distinc[ive architectural features should be avoided.
3. Front entry — The proposal to replace the front entry hood and extend it over to the brick wall
with new column supports does not comply with the guidelines and alters an nnportant feature of
the house. In A Field Guide to .4merican Houses, for asymmetrical, front entry Prairie Style
houses it states that the front entry is usually inconspicuous with the facade being dominated by
horizontal rows of casement windows having sharply defined vertical deYailing. Of conrse many
variations can occur but the entry on this particulaz house is somewhat inconspicuous with bands
of casement windows. Adding a lazger entry porch with columns brings attention to the new
construction and is not compatible with the original design intent.
4. Retaining wall, sidewalk and driveway — To replace and rebuild the exisdng retaining wall using
any salvageable brick with new closely matching brick complies with the guidelines. However,
changing the coping from brick to limestone changes an important feature. The brick coping
relates to the brick coping on the entry wall and that band follows around the entire perimeter of
the house. While a ten feet wide driveway is considered sufficient for a single-family property,
widening the driveway will have minnnal 'unpact; however, the driveway apron width should be
maintained. The loss of the brick edging along the sidewalk will also have minimal impact to the
historic integrity ofthe site.
5. Two-story northeast corner addition — The two-story addition is at the back of the properry and
would require very little loss of any character-defining features. The existing windows do not �
have the brick trim that is on the rest of the house. There is also a set back of the new addition
with the main side elevation and the roof change is still dropped from the main ridgeline of the
�Z
0 ��� ` ��-
Agenda Item IV.D.
HPC File #07-179
house.
• 6. One-story addition — The overall design of the addition is compatible with the size, scale,
massing, height, rhythm, color and material of surrounding structures and the area and complies
with those guidelines. Given the large back yard the rhythm of green space to nearby buildings is
sti11 consistent with existing patterns. ��The addition would require the loss of a lazge
band of casement windows trimmed with brick. These bands wTap azound three sides of the west
wing on two stories and are an important Prairie style feature. This addition is on a secondarv
elevation and will not have a neeative impact.
7. Porches and Decks. The proposed stairs and brick walls at the ground level aze integrared into
the overaZl buzlding design and comply with the guidelines.
E. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on findings 2, 3, 4 and 6, staff recommends to layover the HPC decision in order for the applicant
and architect to find a way to preserve the original front entry design, to redesign the retaining wall to
maintain a brick coping and to consider minimizing the loss of the band of casements on the west wing.
HPC DECISION with changes to findings reflected above:
Based on the findings, the HPC voted 6 to 2 to approve the two rear additions as proposed on the plans
and voted 6 to 0 to denv the proposal to alter the front entrv and to replace the brick coping on the
retaining wall with the proposed limestone.
The construction of the �roved rear additions shall have the following conditions:
• 1. Anv revisions to the a�provedplans must be reviewed and approved bv staff andfor the HPC.
2. The HPC stamped approved construction drawinps remain on site for the duration of the
constructlon proiect.
3. The existi� xeaz elevations will be photo-documented�rior to demolition and new
construction and submitted to the HPC for the files.
�
4 3
Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission
C/o �ce ofLicense, Inspections and Environmental Protectian
8 Fourth StreetE., Suite 200
SairuPaul, MN 55101-1024
Phone: (651j266-9078
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMIVIISSION
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
This application must be comple�d in addition tu the appmpriate city peaait applicatioa if the affected
property is en iudividually designated laqdmark or tocffied within an hisroric districk For appticafions that
must be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission refer to the HPC Meeting schedule for meetmg
dates and deadlines.
Please check the cate¢ory tfiat best describes the proposed work
i7Repair/Rehabilitation ❑Sign/Ar�ming ONewConstruction/Addition
QMoving ❑FenceBetainingWal2 ❑ConceptReviewOnly
❑Demolition ❑Other
Stfeet an$ numbei: 1760 Summit Avenue Zip Code: 55105
Name of contact person: Mark Neison
CompBny: David Heide Design Studio
Street and number. 301 Fourth Avenue South. Suite 663
City: Minneaqolis State: Minnesota Zip Code: 55415
Phone number: (g�2��37-5o6� e-mail: mnelson2aDHDstudio.com
Name: Paul Padratrik & Debre Asqlund
Street and number: 1760 Summit Avenue
City: Saint Paul 5��: Minnesota Zip Code: 55105
Phone number: (65l ) 699-4503 e-mail: opadratzikCa�iaosolso�.com
l�
p�-�'?�
�
r�
L
Contact person: Mark Nelson
Company: David Heide Desiqn Studio
Sh'eet and nuritber: 301 Fourth Avenue South Suite 663
City: Minneaoolis State: Minnesofa Zip Code: 55415
Phonenumber: 672 337-5060 e-mail: mneisonCc�DHDstudio.com
Completely describe ALL eaterior changes being proposed for the property. Include
changes to architectural details such as windows, doors, siding, railings, steps, trim, roof,
foundation or porches. Attach specificationa for doors, windows, lighting and other
features, if applicable, including color and materiat samples.
See attached narrative.
Attach addidonaC sheets if necessary
Refer to the Design Review Process & Checklist for required information or attachments.
**INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL BE RETURNED**
AI2E THE NECESSARY ATTACFIMENTS AND INFORMATION INCLUDED?
p YES
.
Will any federal money 6e used in this project? YES _ N� _�
Are you applying for the Investment TaY Credits? YES _ NO �_
��
I, the uQdersigned, understaud thatthe Design Rev3ew Application is limited to the aforementioned work to
the affected pcoperty. I fnRher vnderstand that any additionat esterior cvark to be done smder my
mvnership must be submitted by application to the St Paui Heritage Preservation Commission Any
unauthoBzed work wilI be r u' edto b reraoved.
Slgnature of applieanf: Dafe: �. � ��
Signature of orvner: .r,.��f 1 �z-- ¢"�----� Date: s��`u7
�
Date received: .5-�^ �� FII.�.1�FO. . :a� ' �� .. .. :.
District: S� /Individuat S.ite: '
�Conhibutin on-coutributing(PivotallSupportevel:. .
Type of �vork: MinorlMo ratelMajor
�` . :: ': '. . ':'..:..,' _ ' .._ ,. . _,
_ Reqa{res staff review
-:.,..- : ...... ..: :...:. ..:....
g data: YES NO
application: YES NO
' Tfie fallowing eondltion(s) must be ''
met in order for application to conform :
' `to preservatian ptograffe: ,
;i
;
:It has 6een determ3ned tl�at the 'I
wnrk to 6e perForme� pursuant to ,, �
"fhe appIIcatFon dnes not adversely
:affect the program for preservation ',
and arch9teetnral contrul of fhe
: lierifage preservation districtor site =
' (CH.73.0�.
HPC staffapproval
�.
"i2equires Comueission revEeiv
;`Submi ed:
:':::- �3 Sets ofPlaos
;;. ,'� 1 Set ofPlaus reduced to.i 1" -:
by.17 ::. .` .:: :'
- : :.i ;� . Photographs .'�:.'..: ;;'':, ; , :.
� �—�' ity Permif ApplicaHon ` .' . ^
=`, � �Complete HPC Design Revie�v::
- - aPPlicatipn . .. .: : ;
Hearing Date set for: _�5" Z.� '��
� 0� � ���12 loo
7
�
� �-���-
� Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission Application
Addendum for 1760 Summit Avenue
6. Project Description
The Mrs. Mae Weiss Fox House at 1760 Suusmit Avenue is a two-story structure
designed by architect J. W. Lindstrom and constructed in 1922. It is a stucco residence
with a brick water table, a hipped, asphalt-shingIed roof, a variety of window types, and
an L-shaped plan.
It is our intention that the proposed project will conform to the chazacter, materials,
design, and details of the existing structure and to the Smmuit Avenue West district
guidelines.
The project consists of six elements:
1. Replace existing front retaining wall, walkway, and steps.
2, Widen existing driveway.
3. Rebuild front enhy, using same footprint as the origfnal, but add a porch roof
to provid'e weather proteation. The roof would match the profile of the
existing entry hood.
4. Construct a sma11 two-story addition at the southwest (rear) corner of the
� house in order to add a half bath on the first floor and a shower and closet on
the second flaor.
- 5. Coxastruct a one-story kitchen addition at the southeast (rear) corner of the
house.
6. Replace the three existing, deteriorated, wood, exterior doors.
Details
Replace existing front retaining wa11 and walkway,
The existing, low, brick retaiiurig wall is severely deteriorated due to water infrltration
and is in need of replacement. We propose to replace it to match tke existing as closely as
possible with the exception of using limestone for the cap instead of brick in the interest
of durability (and preventing/prolonging the need for futnre replacement). The height and
design of the wall will not change. It is our intent to use new brick that matches the
existing colors, size, and texture as closely as possible (though the existing green color is
no longer available). If salvageable, some original brick will be reused. The existing
concrete walkway and brick edging do not appear to be original; they will be replaced
with a new concrete walkway.
2. Replace and widen existing driveway.
The eacist3ng, ten-foot wide, ooncrefe driveway is deteriorated and naxrow and provides
� no place for snow storage. We propose to replace it with a new, concrete driveway that is
`� '1
potentially up to two feet wider. Our discussions with the City Department of Public
Works will determine the width of the new driveway. The concrete will haue closely
spaced horizontal scoring on the slope to Summit Aveue to match the existing as well as
the driveway on the neighboring pmperEy immediately hr the west. The original, low,
concrete retanvng wa11s along tfie front sloping part of the drive will be repIaced with
concrete.
3. RebuiId front enhy stoop, using same footprint but adding a porch roof to provide
weather protection.
The existing front entry consists of a sha(Iow, segmental azched hood and wide brick
pilasters, in front of which exists a concrete stoop enclosed by a brick wall as well as
concrete steps and brick cheek wails with limestone caps. (It is not known if flte stone
caps are oxiginal.) Tha c�isting configuxation does not pxovide any weather protection
and the earisking brick wall is significanfly deteriorated and discolored {as can be seen in
the photographs).
VJe propose to replace tlie existing entry stoop, matching the existing footprint and
design. In order to match tke existing brick at the front of tha house, it is our intention
fhat the brick for the walls will be taken &om the back of the house, wflere fhe two
additions are being constructed. All of the rebuilt brick walls will have limestone caps for
durability.
We propose to consiruct a new roof over the stoop to create an open porch. The sHzpe of
flxe roof would be a confinaadon of, and matck the existing front entry hood. The roofing
maferial is copper. There will be tluee squaze wooden coluwus at the northwest corner
and two'such columns at the northeast comer to support the roof; several colvmns are
proposed so that the scale relates to the pilasters beside the doonvay. The existing metal
plantez box on the front elevation will also be repiaced witfi a new copper box; the design
would be unchanged.
The new porch rood will provide much needed weafher protection at the front entry. The
new structure will be conshucted in the same location as the e�cisting front stoop, so the
relationship with the street will not be altered. There is siguficant precedent for oovered
enixances along Summit Avanue,
4. Construct a small, two-story adc3ition (approxiznately 9 feet by 5,5 feet} at the
southwest (reaz) corner of the house in order to add a hatf bath on the first floor and a
shower and closet on the second floor.
The addition would be minimatlp visible from the street.
The two proposed rear additions aze related to a reconfigeu'ation of rooms on the first
floor of the house. The eacisting, small, cramped kitchen would be moved from the
southwest comer to the new, southeast comer addition. The e�sting dining mom and
:
�����
� svnroom at the rear of the house will be converted to a new faznily room. The existing
sunroom af the northeast (front) corner of the house would become the dining room.
The two-story southwest addition will wnvert part of the e�cisting rear entry stoop to a
half bath. The e�erior door will be relocafed and the steps widened. The first floor
eurrendy has no batbroom. The new conskniction would also permit the addition of a
shower to the originat second floor bathzoom without other alteration to the otherwise
originsl bathroom.
The design and pitch of the existing hipped roof will be maintained by simply increasing
the height of the ridgeline.
The materials and design of the two proposed additions will match the existing
construction as closely as possible. Brick and slucco will match as closely as possible.
Window openings will have brick quoined trim to match existing. Roafing, ridge tins,
and eaue design wiil match existing. New windows will be wood Marvin windows with
sunulated divided lights (interior and exterior grids) and exterior casing profiles to match
the original.
5. Conshuct a one-story kitchen addition at the southeast (reaz) comer of the honse.
This proposed 15-foot by 20-foot addition would have limated visibility from the street.
� The east wall of the addition will be set back two-feet from the e�sting east elevation,
The addirion would also provide a new, small porch for access to the rear yard.
Three new kitchen window openings wiil be trimmed in brick on ali four sides and have
copper window boxes {which allows the height of the water table to be maintained while
providing for higher interior window stools to accommodate the counter height).
The east elevation will have three egress casement windows in a window weIl at a new
basement-level family room.
As is to be expected of a house of this era, the building has a very small kitchen, a small
fami 1y (rear) enfry azea and no family living azeas. The addition of a new family-oriented
ldt�hen is necessary to provide for the needs and expectations of today's family. As
stated previously, all materials and design elements of the proposed addition will match
the existing construction as closely as possible. �
6. Replace the three existing, deteriorated, wood, exterior doors,
Finally, we propose to replace the three existing wood, ea�terior doors. They aze ill-fitting
and deteriorated beyond repair. The front door (which is delaminating) will be repiaced
with a new, wooden door custom-made to replicate the design of the e�cisting (though it
may or may not be paneled below the light). The west elevation door has been altered and
will be replaced to match the original. The rear door wi11 be replaced with a fu11 light
� wood door.
� r
Sununary:
The attached plans show what is to be built but do not contain all the details of the
completed construction drawings. Our hope is to receive HPC approval of the pmposed
project, contingent with HPC staff approval of the final plans.
The sdditions and aiterations proposed fo the residence at 1760 Summit Avenue witl
enhance the chazacter and design o£ the properiy, using materials and details of the
existing struciure. These changes aze necessary in order for tke house to answer the needs
of foday's family and remain viable in to the future. The design of the proposed wotk will
take its direction from the existing building. New exterior materials will be campatible
with the original and design details will reiterate the original. WIuIe the new construction
will continue the design aesthetic of the original building, it will be understandably
contemporary in detail and wili show the evolution of the building as it is changed to
meet the needs of our changing society.
1�
w
� � . -< �� ` �> a, _.. � � ��"� _ � ' �
. 1 t � �� F , �
� �� . ir R ; � n:x�� � ,
�-�
h .���y ; ,
1� � ��;�„., � �s;,?.��g��,� , � :
� , 4� 1 � �
_.�,� �.. �, ,� �; _ E � «
�,�� � , � ,
,�
��. �.�� � �� ���� �
',�;���'� ��+� � �;
..�: .�� ,�
'R �n�� ' F ' .
�>`h \\
8 �y�. T� y.:
� � � ti:�;y �e ' _
•��� '�'3 �6p� �r� �.
� ��a_ +�-� :
�"�'��" • � : - .
� � «�;� , _ ,
< ,
�,.�:� �,, _y;� ��
, ;
�'�t����'�.. , � � , ` ,
�
� �'�'� ��' �. � _ �.,.. _ �
��� �� � � , �,
�� /�,/ "� , � �
��/�� �°- � - '- �� �, � ,
,::
�l ; � � ' � � ' .,
, ,. ,
, ,,
, ;: >: a ' ; , '- :'' � ;' :
;
� � � ,
� ,._ �, '
' „
;«� �a;
�
�t�
; s �� , . r-;;s.^-�
�-�' � �;,, f<
yK��'��� � r _
� , s ��
4� �•y` 1
� �� ' i � 1 �
}
.�„�`'.,��'=� � �° ` .<
� ��.
��^-'�"�"�.�� � �� - � ��:
�� �� r,
,
.. ,-
�' '�
�"� , '
�
�, „� � ��
� �
�� � � =�
�`� t �, ��
�� P � 4: �� . .. � . . ...
.,
r __
_...�-�. � ..
_ �- LL _
.. r��r� . - .
��
f. �
�
�'Y T . ' , .
������ � '� �� ' .. �''���.
� 4
1 �
��a)�j y ^i � �3 ..
S �� � 3
,C C ������' �� .-�
l� ��Y� t
•:°����k��vt`�t� ��?� � � ;���.
� u F
,�C � ' } _ ' . . .
t � �
t �.� l 3� .. _- .
i
�+,I�� A_..�I A�
f`�?S k3 g�� : � ' .. �
� �� sSJx� z�, � , .
�'��Ar : � e ` �- . .� .
��e �^ i � g
� �� �� �� k � ...
. d`�'`u,- -..�= �
, i f � , .
: r � ;,� ' .
-=1. ��i''�,� ��, . ' �;;
4 2
r l
_ l
__�_��
��;- . ..
� .•
�.- , .
�� / �"/ �:
' i .. • ��
, �.
_ _ �
� ,-
_ -.�
, �-•
- �: ��
,
.7'
�J
� j , r
3 -
Y
J i' ',ff
'.G� .
/ f�
/ /":,'
r,����
/ ':
r ' /���
i
/ i
� `:-
'
_��
E
s _
_ r '���' � �.. ��� _�y
R
, �.-� . � � y ,� .
v
S a � ��iA� �� E �
; � � � . . �.
� � �; � � � �����:
' �� �� �.
� ��' E..^.,�+1 ��"dy` .�'� &L . _ ...
� , .:.
v����.,,��'.�' __ - _..
�
�'� � ; �
� �����
��'a,�. *��' � '� � �� �, iy r , - _
�.
� 2 �
a�°�'�.a�' �.m� �'� _'— � -- � , ..... �-
x� �� ' u
_ ��� -� ._
-."'�„ tr-y., - ,�;; � .
. . . .. � ; . .�
. � - ti; � ,v� ,, .; . .
$, „�� �� g 5 "*, ��----_ ��'
-- ..._.__ �
� ��
_ `
. .� � � ?..: . .. . � �- Y ' �
� � �
. ,3�.• '( �---_ , ' j `�~�MO y . yy � °i3
. _.. � ._ • • {�— • 1 . Yb � . Y
� � � ; - .:'.- : . :
.% _... q . �� ' - .. � � >
yy _ _ �� /
_...- _ � ) .. � / � .
� - '.Y { 3 /j f'g /// �.:. "� _
� `�
� f � �
_. � � .._. . .. _. � .' ' :.
* __ _ . S_ .' .� i .. ._...
-�__
.. � a _.. . . � .. G .,. �
�' �b/`� ,— _ ' ' _ _�.
. . - - ���'-� .� 1 . � I f � �. !, � , } �m- .
_.. �a � '_' } ,._ `l� Y 1_ ,�4 a ! 's
_..._._� . ,
, -,- ...._•�-•--.._ .... _. .__.___,-. �_.. __... �- , ...
. _. . . . . �. � _ __ � _ & `.
� 9 a _ . . . . . .. . _ " .
_,�.,_�.._. .,. ,_ ,. - ....
� . . . _. . . . . _ .,�._
��_ � _
� � �
p � t
u � � e� "�'S�3?�° �i5��� ro!. } ^' v \ j V'
, � J Y
v S. .c n ����.an:Y �
�
_ �
R ��
�•� - �
r', :�. ::t07Aa �
F . + ^� �r.,� � �4.'�
���9�. �r -
;
�
,.'
�
�
!"i
��
r�
� -- �
�
� = _
, � -
`�. a
,
ts�
�� �
P � '
�
� _.--�.::.+
+.
I
��
_ _I
6
�
�i
>
n.
i
�
1
i _.
�':.
�
��.
'�` _
7�
1
L
_Y
.......y�� ,. �^
� �
. . .. . �� �,.'
°I .
__ �� ,
� � . � .$.
`
��' �-Y�
�.
� ��
� ^, ,. .
���
����
� . . `i k"!.�._..
0
� �� -' ' ✓ �
/ ��4
.� •� ��� �.�i% ��q ,
t
,�� . 0 � 4 ���� ��
. �
r { � �
^� i • � .,��� �J�
.� �,R . _ `Y .v .
��� a f �
��.�y
4 ` '� � .
e �B Tl `
� � x
. �� ws"j:
. ir.'�!� r f �
i.`
�,_�. � t
E p�'�
� � x �.. �e,b` �'��� � , � -�-��.- � . . �
�` r'�.11�'��.�� � �
�t��
..d, l "'�'� Y
_ r.a.� � .._, ^ "-_ -, -
,_ '.
� " . , �.. . �e' i ,.. ` �f � .
� �� : � i . '.�. - .
� . . . +�t-, \ a... _ ., -y -
,�� j2l '.+.s:P-. • - , .
a. .� \ '�' ,
-� — �•��si�- t< < .,
.�� P -ar�-� � i � � r �; �
��e� �� . � 7 ��� �SA�• ' o _ �.
�� ��t K� � � ' +�Ei f� �+�'^ l �� I
+'b��i' a �"`' 4
� .. ` `�w ���� � ��, d ���� • � ' . .
9�P'� ♦ D'�."W�L�P��E _�
�� ��, r4 ��� ��� � ,�_ . .
e �S' �G �.` : � aCb'� � t
J w � �� ,`.�� � . 11\�� :� ���� . x �:1 �,_. � . -.
• � l� C t '�` '� �}
�/�` =.-..�c, � -
� ` '�
y �� � �,,>
`.�'����� %� �" g � � � p; � ci"' .� . .
�" 9° � t
l ealo- �
P, �
. "e.. x +�' � .. .s
'�=�- � � � � _
. y
�e . ;�* ��+� i `, ��"�.�i-�� . "'
� h f
�t `\' �r ° �'' ---�--"�—�--- - I . _ : ::,� 3 � ' �^..,Z� .- .
3 ��
� �.,� � .� � � ' ?""�,�3,^�'r�x� �"� .
,r.�%� i�-: .� �r .
� �` �--^.:;3.
��
��i
�� � �� �4 �. i� � .
3 ,'�i�`�i .,, � „ ;` ;; : 1 r
-°� ��i `� � ; :;
.�. --s: _. _
:� r
{�, $ -
f � ; �..' _ �
r � � . �
/ x �i ry
i �� . : . . � � . .
� '�1.... j �
r �� 3C�., T ...�{
4 4;u 1
� � � 3 :4TF�._ n 1 \ . �. _
`� �Y.�, . � .
%
�
�i � �� i �.,., . it .
', -�.',.'� c: .�.�
\ _" —` ` �` ' . ..'_
:, � � " ��
1 � � —_..._� 5.
` "�"; . � -i'� ` -. .
+3 "-:
P Y�
� �'..�i:. .
< x S�
�
. �ul .:. 'vv�+.t.n 4 S � f'
._S �__- k., N .- N {^"�.. .
G
� � '
�_ �:-
� ��
� � �
_ .�
�
J v.,% �^� .e v vu �:� t
C{ '
__ . . � _� °T 9� �'. � `, °/ .
r . r /�
. � '�'Y + +�� y < � ��CF '� � .
•. - ^ ' + � " '�f " "' ' S`� � _' A J, .. - " "
� �lf "✓ j �.-�...i%!.
. s " - : S k ' � , " I �. .
� 5 ` Y .
I 1 �` �� f / ' .
� ! 'I �' ,�
� �
s � , � -°��
� ^ _ �� �
,.
}� �� �� . .-. ,
� � .
.. / �. . �yS�� .< 3 Y
. . � _. . . �- � ...-._ " �2°. � r� _
t; �
R ��h �
£ y 1 t
' . d� ,,��4� (��.. ) �� � .
. � . - � � f} ''� � � �t
r � \' YY< �
_ . , . �->> �`�.' r T�.�'e ��. �, -•
� �;;& � sYSS„� i - �,d . +
. ti � *'�" .5 � -�^� ��,c$ r
� � 4 � � � �� T
f�
� J Y � � 1 �� �`� � i�v �i �L aM�� Y �✓yr (
� � 'r �!��G�F�;y^ ��� d � ?� �� S � � � �„/� �
Y � �Y LL� C . ] t
��.z ro '�.°� � H `S \:.. 4J' L 5 � S J/ �
,.�� L': r r H �.1 �, �.; * f a��'� :�^ �,v�i*. �,Tiz'�j,,+ '.r ��.' ��` �r
' 1 � i 1 :./ Sw..3.aJyf+F� �t. vl t r i � � �"{q3 b�S�iS�YCS:
� �� F ��°� ' xr�'�'�� .f�� � s . l�'Sl
i. . .�l �. N',.n�h J z �.� v Q� i� l
' � ¢� tp^uws. �,�'�� S }" � �
c ^w '' },.�ac �' '.
� -;«i ! � ` � V �' Z^ ' �, " RY'S4 y rN"ce .i .+ �;
h s t,r,., •r �� S L r .t„ y >& .�c v .t 's� f r �` � ...
�. i �. � � .� r� y � . - r .
R
�� y} � } '. �4�9�� � ..� '�.ils h
n � : . r . ��wr✓ai
Cd S i ".4s.AtY�'ek..aYmP'.� � i2 � � �r �
� } > n; �,�'q-�s a� � 1 d� y x1�� . 1 � z
.� u _ s.qs a7s.& s'''�.�JY x . x �� �- e C s
� �'�'�` �< b S '- � r �'�v
�: � t ' rm'v . ; .
�e,. " #5 �. :.�..� i t 9 µi k' . : � � . 2,
' r j f�� - t; �,t j l�`a�w s t r k , F `� ,' � � F
�: s t�� '% �, ..� b �a � a+� j� ' � � �,� �� r °f, ,��,` ^.y4 �
� r n - - - x � , ++.5�� ��btt- P.��' �,� °�"`
- . � y -�Y . W +i 2� h 3 3y
(y y 'lc�i �4 r � tl � e .' 4 1 �
� -y��. �(�
a lta�"' >� d"MYwled «F""�s`G'� f %C r SN� i i t ` � ' r �-' � "
. Y �� _ ��� � y� .� Y �
� �� �' . . r�P �� .'" Y � ' E �a �"+� �"v'��,f� � aa
_ . � s. ,� Y� �,+ �� n a,��
:. h : � 1 r : ������ '+'� ` � P
_ � y ✓ .s.� t l.r��3 e �, ° , c'� � �i� � t'.^ �
� y ' !. .e.., = xw.s#�.�8x Xa` .,�a�.: ' � �t� ) -a
°� ' `f ��. i `'� � ^
� r ? �. �, i . ^ �
y ° ;�' ' ' � - �.,`�,� h , r - ._
� �
lr+' � � ? v i 3
, . , . S r `. �.Ml�y44. v .;� nf: n' i�S �:'� � .
. .� ��'k �3tl�L �
� . . . ' } � . . �i �-�f �
3
� � � � ''x'
�.
- � c
�� ,.�1 4� ��.:4 -�: <
� . � �� . � .�. �
• � � :��.n i . .
� i,
���. ,�"'$
'� ,f- a v �s y � , ..
- ;' �,` s' `�
. • �
� � � �:; �
. ,; , .
, _ ,
,� � �� � � � °
�
, ._ y � , - �'�fi -� -�..: t , , � � ��� _ .
. ,. � � � � � � ..,m �"> ��
/ � � . . ' . �. � �� . :c� . ,�- ,.
� � . �: ' . r ��s
/ / ' l k:
! / . \ ' I i � ` �f;. � �
J �. . J t . .' � _ . � . { i�..
„ -
R
� . . . .i �. ..
. F.
. . : . ' . . - . �x�::
/ , " / ./ . . �``.. '. r � : � f' �.
� � � � � � �
/ _ � -,r R £ �c .r�
. /�� 9S y.� ' ai ��` � l9J "
/ A
/ � '�: '� � � '�
,�� ' � .. ... � 3(i .I
i/ �� - —�°� ° ' '� `
,,, r s•
. � .. '' �rL �} ._ ; �azaz' ; :
, - - ' " i �__ + � ��� M1' _ � .� �
i r� � , � � . S �''
r E `
� � •. _ �.„ sa��.� �' � ; .. . .i r � "=
. , _ , 'i, Z ...� � , 3 , . fr . '".e'�,:
� . i . . n /- .�i - i - i �, :
�Y'.: S 4 .. ..�u"���
.. - � . } .. `.. � t ... _ �t �
� �� � � � � -� ���.
' - . i /� , X. / �L �{ y � �'. x .� y y r� �
�"'�:� �� �� . � L �::
e' .. /� . ' ) . � �..` . �� '.;.
! � .ey�
1 � �" d
. " /k � `�i^�*i'�T,T 'Y - � �
x
� � � . /i -� s f � �. :' �
"yR. i ` � / . � �� � y� / Y � t � �°�_t!� �.`
- � '�� � l � I '� �� � ;,
/ � �� , �� �/{ s � S! _ f , . -� � 1 ,4.
� `f'� � ,� .- �'' `* _�
� � -'; l r �� ; '+ - r c . �'
' . �" �/ �. •,'� � ._ fj : � �� � __,�, __ _ 4 ��- � �S
- ?r // ' _ !i/ yf'x °' L` wi _ � _, } � �3'� � � • � :f�
_ y ---- f �. ! F �' x
��j ' E i. �' c. ' a �' , '�
�
. � / '� ��� �, � � � �� ��� ,
/ � I _ I �. I _ � � tr . , � 3
/ . . � �� // � t `'._ i � . y '� fi . i.
/ // / G
� �� / " / ��. • ^� . � 1 ��:� '�' � '}
� .- � � ( �/ � � �. �' ' - �
�t r �� � �� ' _. . .� _.::i"��.--.-__l`_'���. ( - . 3
� �! c f i , � ' _� _ " . �+
' d9 J I'-f /� . "�'�'�,o_.: _ _ a ,� ' � _s
� l� �. � if ' t �� i- _, — �.�r .. . - t
t
/. 1 / { �� � f � �� "�� � � � � p ����� , �.. �. b _
� �// � �` f/' �• / n) �J l. � "� •' " � .. ! .
G
/ ! � ��� , ' > > — ; _ '. ''"� ` ��
' %, � t _'--��'� F � � � , .,
a � � � � , � �,
� � �r�� �� ��E � � ti �
�F;- �� r � ��i i�4'' w.`-� ."� ���� �:��,�� �"� .,
/ f 1 � �
l ' �`� /�'t�� :�;��' �,,,7 O Y �� L �� . i�t �` ` .j Y � � i, `
� � � i �...�6� � � y '� � y vi p �� . i � ♦ �ti ' � , �� � '"� �p� �'� � � �� i .�K :.
. ; 1 1/ ` � jB ...� �� EpOy�fYf ���i1 ���~�_��� �1^�/� .. !� "a:._ k .� .` c �. t ,..�
r ✓ : ��` • \� � a �
� , q �' `-���, t 4 i.�q` y G : � ��- ..' < a'..��•`�� � �._�'�' >��\" � `t'': � �.:
`.�.' {�_ ��-� \ � i� �..f� . ir.�r� = .1' �..iiF� 'r �"D�'aOri s � /� � � �,.,•�e
� / � ��^ � � � : ' � � �� ..=� \�. � �
�� �i � �
/ / i � � , � j '>, � �`-� d� -. �-'� � _
] 1 � l \ J i . /� - � - ' 1 � ��� .� \ � .. �.`T ��4� f - ..
�I \. I. r � ' > �. �� e �^ Q = y �, - •@�'�s s � „ '�� C ,.��'� � y � ;
/ j "��� / / � � \ i ., a �� % � -=--"\ �a,_.�t. . y i �� � � �z f . � � `- �-•�. _�
�/ +s ��� _. � �• ,' = a � � __ � / �,�.
� - -y / �; 3 �� '�-��:�u/ i . �' = - �
^ �' f / � � i �� - � / jR �\ �������.:�\ � '� : �� � �� lwB�t„��"� . . � E� }.
�� / \ � / 1 4 � , " '� . ,.+� ---,'— � " ,/�rs:-'si� � -Oi�� �.., \ �O � ��
� J : ( / �.�� � ! � �� _.j �° .'" � i;� ..
l � � � A � �cv^� � � � � / ��� .�� � , p 3 .: '°- �'
�. � w
\� \�� �..�� \\l � �..'�'l�� ���� i ... -��:
t � . �� ..d i aV =� _ . =� �1
\` �\\� i �� � \��1� J'i _. r a �--�, �"—'�� ��< r a . .' � \ t:
\ � \ � , � � Id �� ,�.! _ - ' � - � l ':
� \'�� \\ , �` 4 \ .^ � v:. � � -. i �/� . � � s'..� . v
\
\ , [+ r � \-. \' _ \ "�� —� — s i �::
\ . \ .. �� � � �� \,� �.n� � \.. a t - . `i � --
, � - _ ,. .� .' 3. -� � ?�.
�. �
�. � .�.� � y..—'� -� � � y✓ � Y � � ,
� -.� / � . / �� , �
✓ � _ �+��..�-. :.� _s ��- \ . .
Y �—^ .,
i A �� _
�1� , ,�� \.�\` . � . , � �` '.�„
•
.
�
s6s 6�m exmflr�se evi�ms
301 FOVCZTti 79VEIYVE SOVTN
MIfIfIE79POL15, MIfII'fE50TA
bb41S-1019
TEL 612.337.b060
F79X SI2.337.SOb➢
Df2AWING INDIX
,4 GGVER SHEE'f g SffE PIAN
A7 DEMOLtTION PVWS g ELEVATIONS
p,2 &�SEMENT & FIRST FLOOR PLAN
q3 SEGOND FLDOR � ROOF Pt?JV
A4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS & BUILDING SEGf10N5
q5 EXTERIOR ELEVAllONS g BUILDING SEGllONS
A6 WALL SECfIONS & DEfPJLS
A7 WALl SEGfIONS � DETA�LS
Ag FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR ELEVATONS
P,g FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR ELEVATONS
A10 FIRSTAND SEGOND FlOOR INTERIOR ELEVAII
A11 SECOND FLOOR ELEVAllONS
Al2 GP9INETRY SEGTIONS
MEl 6Fa5EMENT � FIRST MEGHANIGAL � ELEGTRIGAL
PVaN
ME2 SEGOND FLOOR MEGHANIGAL � ELECTRIGAL
PLAN
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
ISSUE DATE:
05-04-2007
REVLSIONDAT'�:
a�-���
PAUI�
PADT' AT II�
� D�BT'A
ASPI�UND
R.�SID��� ��
1760 SUMMIT AV�NLT�
s�r pAVL N�INNESOTA
55105
����
�� 1 5!R4"�AV
\ ' I
, ,—���a:,� ;
i ��. � �
�i �
24
i i i
�� �
I
�wcoNC. r�ta�cnG � i
w�TO�
�� �
��G�
xr BiD z]
�RENSIIXV
Gf p(ISTNG
H
:--- --
, s
. l. �
i�
I O
_ ;_�
�� ;
,_.
�: ������:
• �
��
I
�
ii�■■■■■
�—.
�
F�.����:lm
w�
SPKF�ALGVG THE
w�nnnoN oF'rviewaxav
PPGROX 6 FCOT GpY1E45.
rsEeui�o oasnHO eu� 4
coNC Qa�wwcesro�o.
cua�noe NEw rsc�
smuc�vzs� a �
�
WSl7N t1AiE414L
&D tt3
OVE WSTNG CONCREIE
�F�caz. s�oce
ioR ovrRrie.ao ccozs
v
�
,,.
:�r�:
��1►�
:
.
��� ��
� °� v_
��� �c
S�E
v
�
w
Q
r
I�
1�
I�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Q�
��
�
�
�
•
C�
DEI"IOLRK'N NO i c�
t osxz�a�m�asr.ECa�.� a rsrMn__ocsvw
r�tiv..�a�r�asrosa.,onsxv.��u ccKSrcwn+�w.s�aa
ECiSTYWI�l'LF•v�P�� �7AfG�' Il'-�1�5
tVVG�'.WN1+.FCFFfYa.GO.�£Trt1'. BYie'EI��WR1lB('Y+
MM"`K£!dFK1�5YEONYULh`D �PL'nilM:Y�LVKaE/V�
5_LIRCALS:S�cTiA'�J� R9Jf.ft:J_'12 '�cGYL1EIX5TNGP'JNG
F � � � � Plq��-u PLaAS a�Cf�L
rc.iv.c�s�r�r.ED�a+roricf 5. ar�ovEAU0.i1r�G
ThEWQd:Na/SE'Jl�:E'JQJIE F1FL7RULWRW.6_VCES.
GRn�Vl�Y� EL.�S. C�R'(N�
2 v^LVP6EFXSTlGG\9I�ETitY. EQJFT'C-N�••
F�PEM. '/�ilJJ6SFX11S£SN^.X�i. Ur7�59YT�t�EN�
eIlL�w.2Ta�aE ElEGf'.tCf�!I�TPLIATK.N.
P190MERYI4lFKN_SPSD.F.L�EO SN_VIGEF%iU�aAW
FfIlfR1Mil�5 W�Cf�.
3 �l(A19iP.iR1C£LPYT.WALSA'O
Rt/.KFGRI.E�VWN.'UVA�D0.YX 6. N`>�P1l.YN/�US
ocn�rrsawwrxmr<u.c�avcf�w rw*�xswxcormo.�
SIRJCM11xiLYFY6QtSMOtCCVMfJ1A'�D Wi415fAiEM'DLCCN
E1KlRC/J.EdSA'ENI'. FE`vTC�h`m COOEw P.40�Y'ITl'c
FFAiHFRCELPYAY9WNLH4TE2>LaTO AFCARFLf�CpV..�.Lm
F%STNG SUfGP24 iFMC � RF5TQ'R
IXSTJ�G84EFLtaOJC.AhO:RHAS H4W2IXYJSYWT3EPL5
RfWfEDFLRALGtAEI'S�..4-9.�SSAVD �WRNG'fh�E
FNS��iN5TN1ATt?tYHT01FX5�W^ FXLlftANCFIIiI�A
PNSNESPfID1FMWE5.
� �o =,ti
����ti�
3�1 [IHA9�\LRSCVIE[
YLV1FA
55615
61133750GOm,
6123375059s�z
�M�rrn..{�m�
� ��Mbm+�
^ �
� �
�� a
� W �
U�
�Z w
��
�Q
N H
��
� �
� �
�, $
I LSSOEDATE
oswanos
� BEVLSiQY7�k�1'��
S
S�
GO�uW.wtvsz:
HRB.CCC.Ajm.MCS,VPK �.
��51': ���,
MEN.DCH
•
ii
J
f 1 I 1�
���,
��, �
��1 �
_r
L__
L _—____J
'��
�
..
�:
�•
.
DEMOLITION
PLANS
SF�Ef NO.
Al
e2ltIIDAVmF4IDED6�(N
•
NOTES
t SffS�.C.TUC/�_RU`)/M
S ThGm.GIf SiES:fLLTFN.
'A.EiL12'1 FSEDA'� 01'
YlSTiS�yltq'�W.pK�
Ai'M1�Q..7OF1lE
s�cs'rnras
2 OATdEi�AR[R�.lGE
IXS]YQY.FG.G44>Cf E
�iL'�VJRKASCE°m
I�A�E81'iFL
CCiJ1F�Ox YRFYIXI�6
v2u<wmnz+t:�
3 Rd'�TIXSTlGFNSt
�' V SFS.^LS � B-�IG i�"G`��
a.crG tar.e �w..�rQa
4 61iEGfSCr1IXSTY
ivAYt�:G FGR.�tIV lb�L
v�carec.v.vrx
6FNWiS
5 s��a.
s�ms�roaorssasn�o
ran�=soz-wrcn
E SE=�Dt'IFNS15'1��'ISE
FGRFn•S`65M. lII3.nip
�ALS
'!. Wr4EWRSCCClAN
caw�eF�.��
pYa'NGS (-A TMFT FlAL CNTYf
savrswzzu;=pm�eson
& c�C2TdtN.LWVArv
ACf�G]4V`c W11XAA^ a
TEHME$TASA�BVID1'Ya
CLGF 54M'JNl� LTAM4`KLS
Ab p}ELPT. �GN£CLSFS
s. wer.su.wuwrenw
n�anvsran� �o�
t�CSTGCANSiW.l:�Q1 �cRFI'
AILOI'B5YXV6EC5T.�G
CIX�STiXfP.' FRGR'O
°��TfJI.G ilil�W� BHJCA\f
AYfpSC�AW^5-011E
A�TQVCGT£NG'1{lf.
YJ. c-SnREfi°P.PE0.SfN^.a
w�rns�.vQeFr
n �w:Er�nrsnsrrs.r�o
FLafF1YNxlFIXSi+GE
T5T/UATCNCFfEW
�tNVCiI.Efi.KT�LCIV.
SSBx YJt'YE`�iyJfCF
�vau
fpGGL`]kBpL�NGE
3Ni2HA9EV1Y50VfIi
•'�_�T�0121�1�FSOfA
ss�u
6123375060x¢
6123375059Fwa
�...,m.,....�rs�.a
YR�PNbia�.
v+rrr��.oiWd r.
•
� �
I
Oe
.u�at+�aa��rnr�.
➢2IIKGl6TOt�EW h'HLQt
WTlLSA cTO�f3LLNEGf
Si1D' �,-1 F/f£6 Eza=
WNLS)
. o+ausnrs w.w. exs+ea
WµLSNETOFK'cGF
� �MlYaGRM44'>l�RY.
. CU`20.'82i'QSN�TOiT[r-J�
FTCc
.or��-o�.�rs,w�-o
BY�Q�Ci9�ll�Y.
���
� O
�
� �
� W 4
U�
�Z w
�W
�
��
�
� �
4
� �
� �
LSSOE DATE:
Oias2JO'[ •
� �� T ��
5
�,O�naawtvsr:
HP9.CCC.Nm.MCS,VPK
CE$Q'� HS':
A�1i`.DCti
•
_cu
��IN
Bt�SFT'��1�
b'f'�zsr
FLOOR
PLANS
s�erxo.
�
a2(IWOAVm}RIDEDffi(HV
I 13iL'�CI'ICNI rvti�
V4'=1'-0'
.
L J S�Slid%.'ILRN.WhWNVf- 4 Qf(EFP:GMIXSTTY & �LR"IN1NCttCN
4TG�GY15'<ES�KLILSY�L FaTP.-LGFQt�w0.'YXC PCClFA^IYc�NTE�
�.��p��gy ''/`�-��/`�- T c�ttIIJ��ASA._BtRDNS
rv.r.50wrw�nuPG �'`'N'� CaoESNrrvw..cfOw.�.
ATT£S9GFTE 5 SEELCGREWfCON A`DQ18[A'R'GYCG�4
.�KY�UTGNS f-A'FfAA£+�LRD.�Q50NSAKl
R91�13��"WTLTL 9. �YPLL.�'NTGNQJ
2 GATPiE(BARCFfE�A^c TEPA�5f8J��TOi1£
IX4.TG�i.CAS*YY.E 6 SEEf+GR'IF+is-i�p,+E EX�TNGCLnGTdKTGTavFRfY
I'iL'�1CrKA5�'m F�FFA'9ff5M'JfB.ni J N'_DS£�C'Li�t5�FX5T]'Y
A'.�'P�. Ai=BY irE �ON �GRTO
CQ�iReCfGR VHtFY�Jfi �"pt' ECY>I�NNG:IIN'[A' ALYN�11'
WRS\YIM�Cf. �. Mr�Rc'D..Y%£aCCGI.RN AWOS�FJA�Sro�-'=
LLA�£25LFP.'�'-G.LClJ�iE A��CN6:1EPVMLT'T.
3 P.QFLTIXSTI'FN91 pp�`/�C�'OAYhTftll.USt�Y
1'Mi�vTA'�S�BE.W'f$�"U �A�' Z'P.�AS�i'SLR O. fEi�ARE[�a19LIX5lKa
a.�zr�cc�.s�a.crora o+Flzcc*sm.c'aa�er^ w�.�nsrEw�.�+'
n rwfceiwrsn5zma
FLa(�CYNKLFIXSisGE
dJy'T/�L:ATQi6A.�V
KLHwlN.EHIL�Ut
v ^'iF1'G
V.GR'
lBGMA'F3pW�'.E
?t1ifF�AVEV1.85OUlH
31LL'�F.tF�[l$!2\'�'EOI'A
suu
612337.��Nm.
6123375059Fes
��+
T ������
��
��
•
� �
��"GL�ilO�^z-
.4`112 �NERW$NT'�.
OYE�; TOI��W N'BiLR
W.°1J.aA'£TO@�RLiE6
ST� Qipl�l F/�^ECFO(5]TY
WPLy9�
, otFryQ.ri6N1IX�lR
WN.LsK£roFil'£GF
54AiMT1: diY✓v�IX'�1'.
.cv=.nz�a� �oFx�
F!'�
•DLgyLrGTO�NETp
m.e�a_acFC� r�.
� �'�Y
'l
� �
���
a i ���
''. ``.
1� 4,
���►y
�
� 7
� a
� W �
U�
�Z w
��
�Q
� H
��
� �
� �
�, $
LSSUEDATE
. Os.oa2aol
�����
�o�� �:
HRB.CCC.AJm.M(9.VPK
CHfQ:ED BY:
laEt�'.ncH
�CO�
FLOOR &
ROOF
PLANS
SE�ECNO.
A3
e9JPlDAVmF4IDEDE9CN
v4:-Ta�•
•
�
h'i -' i 7�
�,���
������
�..���
x.,,
ciz��so6o�
6123375059enx
�+,�....
•T��.m�b����
�.M� ..
C�
� BUILDING SEGTION �11 NORTH ELEVATION
vz-ro� va _r-o�
O
� x�
�� 4
� r'T c.
U� w �
�v�
�z
�V �
�
N H
� �
� �
�
� �
� $
LSSOEDATE
otu2ao't
��
5�`
GO�vu�wwrrsr:
eaa,ccc�lm.�cs.ve�c
crgct� sr:
�,�
•
_ �21 BUILDING SECTION _
va - r4
K
EXTII2IOR
FS.EVATIONS &
BUII.DING
SECTIONS
s��eerxo.
A4
eZUO]MVmFff�ED�I@I
$�e�s�vr
E ��� ���,�� �
�� ����
•
����
��a���
����.�,
�,
61Z3375050x¢
6123375059eez
n,+,.+r.... �.. s a.. r�
� ����i:mo+�
•
•
i �0 1�=:Y�x_[d
�11 6UILDING SEG710N �-------
\ 0�.7 V4"=T�
�%
E e�vear*ac*'u. � oasnw^eui�a� � r�wmrvs�mwrtn �
,, ,..... i
... a �
---'� SOUTH ELEVATION
va = i-o
G
�
�
1�
�
�
f
�
�
^ w
1'�
�
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
f'1
U
�
W
�
H
�
�
�
S�
a
�
�
�
�
$
�
65[JEDATE:
05.o41�R1
�����
�°
S
GO�vaawrrsr:
BRB.CCC.Nw.MGS.VPK
CF�CfiEDBY:
ME[..DCEI
SE�ECNO.
A5
aaMDAVmthIDEDEaGN
EXTII2IOR
ELEVATIONS &
BUILDING
SECITONS
ocSTNGBUtDnG NelveGnG'Rd:efaN
C �
•
•
I `rcAtYN.L�tVSfNi W/
�$' TfY�LN '
2
- _ 1__-. 1 /zr�r.�i�;/%��//:
, I
— ---L- --� �
_ , /.�� . �
/ I i�
� �
= i .
��.
r:'. :I
. � _ �.
I. �
�."�`�.�_ .. - .� .�-�� ..
' • � • . �: r . ' ' 4 .
--, � -_ :'-J .
------- : ,� _ .
' •' . , _ `•I-
1 : �
' � —�.�� §I � § ��. �
�— ---
I =4 t � * 1
�71 WALL SEGTION
r_r-Q
�
f� FlRST flD..Yt
4 � mo
3TEC 0.l'NM1X)J-
�-�' L4N'DP10CM16
FTIS4 R6R --
��
} v�v. ev. -
avai tw<w�. siu, e
PLRdJTOM4Tp1
onsnrG
cm �v.vs
� �.�
�
���w�
W/ RL9 FBE2`aL/�95
,. r
_.�:.
,{,.
•�d�
—ASiFi^1TSYNSL:S
-��,
— }0.`.'�W�'1J
—2K.xJ5I59]tOL.
CPJ�FlI��Bt�
�C�nCNF..2�eL :
W/DC+�Ni
4
�
3'Ja F$T
W9FBEPaT-
ceunrw
j' Rra�or.v
� ws
4' F/�E BRCK
�,.,,,�
@�6'OL
INSIAJS4.'ry
6'IXtNN'fV— I I • •
� � �� ��•�•• �
aa�aa'o.cv¢r
' I - �Ea6Y'OGKRZ.
,.' � � GFMIAPRPII
����� �J.. `�'�a��,�
�Q -- - ���.
�1 WALL SEG1lON ' '
r=i-o'
F,�,
aamns oc
��'�1
6'FXEB20'
� 1F2. CQfGE
�JGSiWiRAJ_G
�1 WALL SECTION C� RETfVNING WALL
r-na
[qf.RNNF%aIA.\(8
b1iIHA9EVL'ESOUR!
NL�P' dtV[b,ffi"�IA
ss�ss
6123375060�m.
6123375059ri.a
i
�...,.+......rsam.�
�w^�P9�3�s�v
4W�ae��.MW+�s�
�1 �
� �
4
� � �
�U
w�
� �
� .�
, � H
� �
� �
c
� ^ � �
1"� �
ISS[lE DATE:
� ''
S��
�,O�aawxar:
BPB.CCC.AJW,M(SVPX
Cf$Cf.'FDBY:
�.�
W�
SECITONS
J
STIEETNO.
�6
oXIWMVmF�EOF516J
Macpherson-Towne Company
4900 Cedar Lake Road
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
Phone: (952) 377-0050
r1
LJ
24 May 2007
� �� �7�
Mr. Mark Nelson
David Heide Design Studio
663 Grain Exchange Building
301 Fourth Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
Dear Mr. Nelson,
This letter is accompanying two (2) sets of potential brick
replacement samples for the Asplund/Padratzik project at
1760 Summit Avenue in St. Paul. These samples are in
addition to the samples left at your office in late March.
The samples accompanying this letter include "Olde Towne"
blend from Acme Brick Company and a blend of Belden Brick.
• This blend is 600 ��Nutmeg", 25% ��Napier" and 150 "Canyon
F/R" brick.
In addition Terry Chance of Site Assembly asked us to
provide some discussion concerning the relative merits of a
brick wall cap versus a stone (or cast stone) cap for the
retaining wall.
he main design problem with a brick cap is the extensive
number o£ horizontal mortar joints in the cap. There is
potential for separation of the brick masonry and the mortar
which will allow infiltration of moisture into the retaining
wall below the cap. The extensive number of horizontal
mortar joints in a brick cap increases this potential.
Typically the mortar joint in this construction would be
more porous than the brick masonry which would also increase
the potential for moisture infiltration.
A stone (or cast stone) cap would have significantly fewer
horizontal mortar joints which would decrease the potential
for moisture into the wall below the cap. Moisture
infiltration could also be reduced by installing sealant
(caulking) in the horizontal joints in a stone cap. We do
not feel that caulking a11 horizontal joints in a brick cap
• would be an appropriate treatment.
�a�A�d o�(�j Ma�{'tyt t��
Bwiding Restoration / Bwidmg Preservation / Tuck - Pointing / Bwiding Cleamng / Pneumatic Concrete / Waterproofing / Caulking
l nle ►�1�1 •
r�
U
We recommend the installation of a waterproo£ membrane at
" the top of the new retaining wa11. This membrane would be
adhered to the top of the wall and extend down the back side
of the wall a minimum of four (4) inches. This membrane
would tie into any waterproofing installed on the back side
of the wall. This membrane should be installed prior to
either a brick cap or stone cap.
Since the waterproof inembrane will be a bond break between
the mortar bed joint and the top of the wa11 the cap units
(stone or brick) must be mechanically fastened to the top of
the wall.
Moisture infiltration at the cap level will be contained by
the membrane flashing. The potential for more rapid moisture
infiltration with a brick wa11 cap could lead to additional
cyclical maintenance of the wall cap or premature
deterioration of the cap. Elimination of the membrane
flashing could lead to mare premature deterioration of the
brick retaining wa11.
We recognize that a stone (or cast stone) cap will alter the
historic appearance of the existing retaining wall. This may •
well be a significant factor in determining the appropriate
material for the wall cap of the rebuilt retaining wall.
I hope this information will be helpful. Please feel free to
call if you have any questions or if we may be of further
assistance.
Sincerely,
�MACPHERSON TO NE COM NY
Mark F. Macphe on
•
�5/�
•
(PARTIAL MINUTES NOT APPROVED BY HPC] �� ��(�
MINUTES OF THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Lower Level — Room 40, City Hall/Court House, 1� West Kellogg Boulevard
May 24, 2007
Present: Richazd Faricy, April Haas, Pat Igo, Carole Kralicek, Paul Larson, John Manning, Lee Meyer, Dick
Nicholson, Mark Thomas, Shazi Taylor Wilsey
Absent: Carol Cazey (excused), Susan Bartlett Foote (excused), Dick Nicholson (unexcused)
Staff Present: Amy Spong, Christine Barr
CALL TO ORDER: 5:10 PM by Paul Larson (Chair).
1. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was approved. Wilsey, Meyer (8-0)
2. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: There were no conflicts of interest stated.
4. PERMIT REVIEW/PUBLIC HEARING
A. 1760 Summit Avenue, Summit West Historic District, by David Heide Design Studio, for a building
permit to construct an addition, alter the front entrance and other site improvements. File #07-179. (Spong,
266-9079)
Staff read the report recommending to layover the application. Staff received e-mails stating which
recommendations the applicants are okay with and which ones they are not. They are going to be asking the
commission, instead of laying everything over if there is some common ground and the commission and
everybody agrees on a certain item, to split up a decision so they could move forward on something. Larson
said that sounded reasonable.
Larson asked if there were any questions of staff. Meyer asked if there was an architect of record. Staff said
there was. It is David Heide Design and that they were on the plans. Meyer said he meant the original
architect. Staff said that was not on the survey sheet.
Staff showed pictures showing the different brick patterns. Trout-Petrel asked if there was just the canopy, or
that inset that was stucco proposed to have a tile design noted in the plans. Staff stated that was removed from
the proposal. Staff showed where the two story addition was being proposed and it still will have a set back
from the outer elevation. Staff showed where the area of the one-story addition is proposed to be infilled.
Larson asked staff to go back to the angle where the addition was being proposed that was the most
controversial. Larson opened the public hearing. David Heide from David Heide Design was present.
The applicant addressed the three concerns of the staff regarding their proposal. The first was the front
entrance. Applicant said it is a reasonable objective and request by the homeowner to provide weather
protection at the front door of the house. Applicant feels that the design that they came up with, does not
detract from the character or face of the house, since the new roof over the porch is an extension of the existing
hood, it is reversible. Applicant addressed the tile inlay over the front porch that has been removed from
� he project so that is no longer part of the project. Applicant said there is historic precedent for covered
entrances in the surrounding neighborhood of Saint Paul. Applicant provided images of other houses, both with
,i
column entrances and bracketed entrances. Applicant said the use of brackets in this case is not possible in the �
fact we enter the main stoop from the side and so a person would bump into the bracket. The columns that the
applicant is proposing recapitulates the brick pilaster on the front house. Applicant said they are not changing
the footprint. The columns will rest on the exisring brick wall; therefore, it doesn't change the scale or the
proportion of this element on the house.
Applicant addressed the stone caps on the retaining wall. Applicant went on to say that the owner wishes to
use the limestone rather than the brick caps for the sake of durability. Applicant had a letter from the mason
Macpherson Towne, recommending using limestone instead of stone. Applicant found stone used historically
throughout Summit Avenue, in fact both properties on both sides of this properiy either have stone caps on
retaining walls or pier locations. Applicant asked for the consideration of limestone. Applicant also said that
limestone is currently being used on the existing cheek walls on the entrance to the house so there is precedence
in this project as well for use of limestone.
Applicant addressed the third concern which was the one-story kitchen addition and the L-portion of the
house. The house has a very tiny kitchen with about a dozen windows and doors and stairways and there are no
family areas for the house only entertaining type areas. This'has been a primary concern of the project to create
a family usable, modern convenience of the kitchen and a family room. The applicant studied various locations
for these amenities and one of the solutions involves extending the wing on the left forward. Because of the L-
shape of the house it is already broken up and you have to go through the dining room and the living room to
get to the room on the right. Placing the kitchen in the intersection of the L creates a relationship between all of
the spaces and defines the front of the house as public and reaz of the house private. It was a very difficult
decision for the owner and the architect to remove the band of casement windows but the benefits of the kitchen
in trus location faz exceeded the loss of the windows. •
Applicant has set back the one story addition from the sidewalls to minimize the view from the street; they are
using the same articulation of brick azound windows and details of trim and so forth of the house in that
addition as well the addition that includes the extension of the hood over the front stoop. Meyer made the
comment he liked the resolution of everything; but felt the columns weren't the right thing. Something more
prairiesque. Would they try anything else? Applicant said they tried brick columns and they looked
cumbersome. They studied the brackets also and that would impede the traffic and pedestrian flow. Meyer
said a pair or a single flat one with more stretch. Applicant said they also studied that and felt the mutti smaller
columns were better proportionally to the house, applicant would take this under advisement.
Larson asked the applicant if he consulted or if he was awaze of the plan books at the Minneapolis public
library. Applicant said they did do some reseazch in this matter. Lazson said Lindstrom published at least 3
plan books and Minneapolis has at least one of them. Larson said that would have been one way to see how
they might have resolved this issue because they certainly had covered entries as well. Applicant agreed.
Manning asked if the motivation for this extension was more about visibility to the street rather than getting out
of the elements. Applicant said it was purely for weather protection. For arriving guests in bad weather waiting
at the door and ringing the bell this is for weather protection at the front step.
Haas was curious what was going in the place of the tile inlay that the applicant said was removed from the
plan. Applicant said the stucco panel that is currently there would remain. Trout—Peh�el asked the applicant if
he considered doing a band of casement windows at the new addition. You have two elevations where they
could do windows that match those on the rest of the house. Applicant said they did. The use of the windows •
�
����1�
basically took away the function of the kitchen because of the significant portion of cabinets. This kitchen
�eing at the back of the house, of course relates to the back of the house, which has the single and muitiple
paned double hung windows as well. It's only on the East wing that we see the casement windows. Larson
asked if there were anymore questions for the applicant. Public hearing closed as no one else was present to
speak.
Larson called for a motion. Meyer recommended accepring the proposal as presented. Haas seconded.
Meyer thought it was a good proposal, he thought the extension on the front is appropriate, he thinks it responds
well to the existing conditions. He thought the rule that they couldn't alter a building to reflect modem
conditions and functualiry is a very limiting narrow view. Wilsey-Taylor disagreed totally with Meyer, she
thought the total opposite about the front. She is fine with the rest of the proposal and she is inclined in seeing
the stone on the low cheek walls, and the limestone cap up neaz the house. Staff said they didn't know if it was
original or if it was a later addition. She does not agree with the proposal that the front is fine. She thinks that
piece needs to be laid over and they need to come back with an alternative if they want to extend. They need to
do their homework more on the design of that. She will not vote in favor of it. Igo said he is against it also.
He concurred with Commissioner Manning and Commissioner Wilsey that the back is fine, and they don't have
any rules that they can't change something if is isn't interfering with the integrity; but the front would be a
drastic change for Summit Avenue. Commissioner Thomas said the building is sculptural. Felt that back of the
house makes it sculptural. He suggested that perhaps there needs to be a deepening of appreciation how that fits
together, and certainly should that be altered there certainly should be documentation of this. This house is
highly effective but particularly from the back.
Larson said the Secretary of Interior Standards don't address the issue of stylistic purity, what they address is
�;haracter defining elements oF house when house was built. The east wing which is surrounded by casements is
only the really pure prairie school there. There are the elements that they have like the unmolded and stuccoed
overhang, it's very flat and has a roof edge. We aze asked the purity of a style we are asked to protect a house,
at least in terms of its character defining elements. We need to determine which elements of that house are
character defining and which would be threatened by the remodeling. Lazson said he was heazing several
concerns about the front entry, asked about the other two elements the coping on the landscaping elements, and
the reaz casement windows. Trout-Oertel said the windows on the original house are long and skinny and thaYs
a strong element of the house. The windows on the addition are double hung; she felt it was such a big addition
that the windows look a little small on everything for the size of the addition. Igo said he was ok with the
retaining wall. Thomas disagreed with Igo saying that the retaining wall was in its original condition and he
thought it would detract to take that piece away. Kralicek stated she was against the front changes. Wilsey-
Taylor said it would definitely change the look; it would look much more modern. Larson deviated from
protocol a bit, he thought one way to attack the 3-part issue, is to take a straw vote on the 3 sepazate elements.
Before that Larson called the question. Motion was defeated 1(Meyer) to 7.
Larson asked for a partial approval. Wilsey motioned for partial approval on the back of the house. Igo
seconded. Igo only had a concem with the windows. Wilsey asked if they were casements. Staff said they
were in-swing. Motion passes 6 to 2(Thomas, Trout-Petrel). The rear additions are approved. The
findings #2 and #6 it addresses. The applicant will submit to staff photo documentation of the rear elevation,
shot both obliquely and in elevation. Lazson said some of that was done here but the commission would like the
quality upped a little bit.
•
Z�
Wilsey would like to make a motion on the driveway widening, the retaining and sidewalk, and the front �
entry. Wilsey made the motion to layover the front facade and the brick wall, and she is in favor of
widening the driveway. Staff said she wasn't making a motion because it was just a layover. Staff said that
widening the driveway if it is not on the apron, staff can approve that staff tries not to do any widening on the
boulevard to maintain as much green on the boulevard and it is also considered parkland diversion which is a
whole other matter to go through that process to even get that approved. So staff has actually on a staff level
approved the widening of driveways, because this came to them as a whole proposal staff automatically brought
the whole proposal to the HPC.
Wilsey made a motion to deny the front entry design and the limestone cap to the brick wall. Igo
seconded. Larson said his only misgivings was to send a cleaz message to the applicant of whether a redesign
would be alright or whether we aze just rejecting anything that projects from the existing entry. Staff said in
denying, it does not prohibit them from coming back with a revised proposai. Larson said part of the denial
of the front entry design and part of the denial was of the concrete or stone coping as a replacement of
bricks. Larson called question. Morions carries 6 to 0(Meyer abstaining). Lazson told the applicant what
has transpired. He said the commission had approved the rear additions, they had denied the application for the
revision to the front entry and the copings with the option to the applicant to come back with a redesign of the
front entry. Staff said that staff has the ability to review and approve things that aze in-kind, so if you are
proposing to replace your retaining wall in-kind, staff can approve that administratively. StafF said that the part
that was denied is not the rebuilding of the retaining wall. Applicant was told he can come back with a revised
proposal for the retaining wall.
7. ADJOURNMENT: 8:25 pm
Submitted by: Sherry Huffman
•
�J
T�
SAINi
°.AUL
�
lIAAA
•
��
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
Christopher B Co(enaaa, .tlayor
May 29, 2007
Mazk Nelson
David Heide Design Studio
301 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 663
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Re: 1760 Summit Avenue, Summit West Historic District
May 24, 2007 - HPC Permit Review, Agenda Item IV.D.
HPC File #07-179
Deaz Mr. Nelson:
As you know, the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) considered at its May 24, 2007
meeting your application for a building permit to construct an addition, alter the front
entrance and other site improvements at the property listed above. The HPC voted 6- 2 to
approve the rear additions as proposed on the plans and voted 6— 0 to deny the proposal
to alter the front entry and to replace the brick coping on the retaining wall with
limestone. This decision was based on the discussion at the public hearing, public testimony
and findings by the HPC.
The construetion of the approved rear additions shall have the following conditions:
I. Any revisions to the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by staffand/or the
HPC.
2. The HPC stamped approved construction drawings remain on site for the duration of the
construction project.
You or any aggrieved party has the right to appeal the Heritage Preservation Commission's
decision to the Saint Paul City Council under Chapter 73 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
Such an appeal must be filed within 14 days of the date of the HPC's order and decision.
Chapter 73 states:
(h) Appeal to city council. The permit applicant or any party aggrieved by the decision of the
heritage preservation commission sha11, within fourteen (14) days of the date of the heritage
preservation commission's order and decision, have a righl to appeal such order and
decision to the city council. The appeal shall be deemed perjected upon receipt by the
division of planning [LIEP] of hvo (2) copies of a notice of appeal and statement setting forth
the grounds for the appeal. The division of planning [LIEP] shall transmit one copy of the
notice of appeal and statement to the city council and one copy to the heritage preservation
commission. The commission, in any written order denying a permit application, shall advise
the applicant of the right to appeal to the city council and include this paragraph in a11 such
orders.
AA-ADA-EEO Employer
DEPARTMENT OFSAFETY ANDINSPECTIONS
Bob Kessler, Director � ^ �/
��. <<.�
CO.t4.11ERCEBL/LDI.�'G Telephone� 6i1-266-9090
8 Fourth Street East, Seute 200 Facslmile� 657-?66-9!?J
St Pa:d, .LLnnesom 55l01-IOIJ It 2b tnnr stpmd gov dsl
�-Z
Please note, an HPC approval or conditional approvaZ does not obviate the need for meeting �
applicable building and zoning code requirements, nor is it a permit to allow for work to
commence. An HPC approvat or conditionai approval expires after one yeaz if no permit has
been issued. If revisions to the approved plans aze made, be awaze that addirional HPC andlor
staffreview will be required.
Please feel free to call me at 651-266-9078 if you have any questions. The permit application
and plans for the rear additions will be forwazded to the plan review�ers for further processing.
Sincerely,
��fn�u �.�,
Christine Barr
Planner, Historic Preservation
cc: Jon Hegner, Building Inspector
Paul Padratzik & Debra Asplund, owners
File ✓
•
C�
�3