07-812City of St. Paul
RESOI,UTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT
COUNCIL FILE NO. D�' �' 4
B � � Lfg -
File No.
Assessment No.
Voting Ward
5
Green Sheet No. 3041990
In the Matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for the
ORANGE/PARK RSVP.
Preliminary Order
Final Order:
06-110
06-279
approved
approved
02;01/06
03; 15i 06
WHEREAS, A public hearing having been had upon the assessmer.t for the
above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by
the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be
it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all
respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be ar.d ir is hereby
determined to be payable in twenty equal installments.
Yeas Nays Absent
Benana� ✓
Bostrom ,/
Harris ✓
Hel en �/
Lantry �/
Mont omery r/
Thune ✓
_ �
Adopted by the Council: Date: �s
Certified Passed by the Council Secretary
By � �
Mayor
19025
5071
City oi St. Paul
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT
COUNCIL FILE N0.
File No.
Assessment No
Voting Ward
Green Sheet No
D�-BI�-
_19025_
5071
5
3041990
In the Matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for the ORANGE/PARK
RSVP.
Preliminary Order
Final Order:
06-110
06-279
approved
approved
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
02%O1/06
03/15/06
The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the
following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in
connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total construction costs
Engineering and Inspection
Valuation and Assessment Services
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Charge To MISC FUNDS
Net Assessment
$1,900,000.00
$
$ 28,151.70
51,928,151.70
$1,525,984.50
S 402,167.20
Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and
levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $402,167.20 upon
each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improvement,
and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits
conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto
attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer,
and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is
herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered
proper. _� � �
Dated ��� �(' U"��
r
v�-�1 a- �
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet
D 2/as/o �
Depar4nenUofficelcounal: Date Initiated:
P�r�/ -Public Works ,���-0� � Green Sheet NQ: 3041990
Contad Person & Phone: �� ) �
Juan Ortiz L ����
266�864
Assign
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): Num6er
Ot-AUG-07 For
Routing
Doc. Type: OTHER (DOESNT FIT ANY C Order
E-DocumeM Required: Y
Document ConfaM: John Saumweber
ConWM Phone: 266�&51
0 Public R'mks Jaan Ortiz _'
1 Council Man Ericksou
2 CSty Clerk S6ari Nloore
', Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip Ail Locations for Signature)
, Action Requested: --�
Set date of public hearing to ratify the assessments for the ORANGE/PARK RSVP. I
j File No. 19025 Assessment No. 5071
Recommendations Approve (A) or Reject (R):
Planning Commission
CIB Committee
Civil Service Commission
t. Has ihis person/frtn ever worked under a contract for this department'�
Yes Na
2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this persoNfirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
curtent city employee?
Yes No
Expiain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Rarificarion is necessary in order to begin collecring assessments to help pay for the project.
Advantages If Approved:
Same as above.
i DisadvanWgeslfApproved:
j Property owners will have assessments payable via proper[y taaces.
i
Disadvantages If NM Approved:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
T2nsaMion:
Fundiny Souroe: Assessments & Misc Aid
; Financial Information: $1,90Q000.00
(Explain)
i
i
CosURevenue Budgeted: y
Activity Number:
July 19, 2007 827 AM Page 1
�� �'ia_
bet:er servi<e
6etter Iiie.
E�ll�llSt 28� 2,0�7
Council Member Lee Hel�en
City Hall, Room 320-A
15 West Kellogg Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55102
RE: File Number: 19025
Assessment Number: 5071
Property Address: 55-65 Hyacinth Avenue West
Parcel ID Numbers: 19-29-22-33-0005 and 19-29-22-33-0004
Dear Council Member:
We are in receipt of the notice of public hearing regarding the above referenced.
Please be advised that this office represents the property owner and manages the
properties commonly known as 55 and 65 Hyacinth Avemie West in St. Paul.
The proposed assessments for the above referenced property Parcel ID 19-29-22-33-0005
are $11,449.60 and property Parcel ID 19-29-22-33-0004 are $7,156.00. These two
assessments, totaling $18,605.60, represent an inordinate burden to the property.
These two properties, which comprise 52 apartment units in two separate buildings,
�axuloi afforn ihi5 type oi a5SeSSrileirt.
The rent paid by the residents, which are mostly low to moderate income, barely covers
the real estate taxes, insurance, utilities and other expenses to the property.
We are protesting the proposed assessment for this street improvement project based on
the following:
I) The work that was done was not an improvement to the property.
2) The cost of the project is really not benefiting the owner's property. The
"improvements" will not increase the market value of the property in
excess of the cost of the project nor will it creaTe a better living condition
to the existing residents living at the property.
952 540.8600 p
952.540.8601f
5402 Parkdale Drive, Suite 200
St. Louis Park, MN 55416-1661
MANAGEMENT.INC
better apartments.
/�� b�ia
It was necessary to do this work because of the age of the street and the �utters, and the
need for additional street lightin� that was long over due.
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that I and the owner as well, will be out of
town on September 5, 2007 and will be unable to attend the public hearing and give you
our oral statements.
We feel that this assessment is large and can cause undue hardship to the owner.
Therefore, we are reiterating our protest to you at this time. We also call your attention
to MN State Statute 429 as well as the appropriate case law that accompanies that statute.
It is clear that these two apartment buildings on Hyacinth Avenue wili not see an
increased property market value because of the repair and the repaving of these
roadways.
Any consideration that you may see fit regarding this assessment would be greatly
appreciated.
We appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to hearing from yott.
Very truly yours,
S TEV N SCOTT MANAGEMENT, INC.
�
�
St achtman, C.A.M.
CC: Shelly Smith, Owner