Loading...
07-510AMENDED 6/6/07 Council File # o - /v Green Sheet # 303 RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �7 Legal Desc: MICHEL'S SUBDNISION OF BLOCK 4, STINSON'S DIVISION E 41 FT 7 INCHES OF LOT 28 BLK 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 WHEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Office and information obtained by Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement on or before September 18, 2006, the following are the now known interested or responsible parties for the Subject Property: George Farkas, 10850 Tyler Ct. NE, Blaine, MN 55434; Countrywide Home Loans/ Remaac Assoc. Plus, 480 Hwy 96 W Ste. 200, Shoreview, MN 55126; Wells Fargo Bank NA Trustee, C/O Countrywide Home Loans Inc., 7105 Corporate Dr Ptx-C-35, Plano, TX 75024-4100; Wilford & Geske, 7650 Currell Blvd. Suite 300, Woodbury MN 55125; District 6 Planning Council, district6(�a qwestofficenet WHEREAS, Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement has served in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code an order identified as an "Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s)" dated February 27, 2007; and WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested ar responsible parties that the structure located on the Subject Property is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 4S; and WHEREAS, this order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or demolish the shucture located on the Subject Property by March 29, 2007; and WHEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declaring this building(s) to constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and WHEREAS, this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the City Council and the Saint Paul City Council; and WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the time, date, place and purpose of the public hearings; and WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City Council on Tuesday, May 15, 2007 to hear testimony and evidence, and after receiving testimony and evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or responsible parties to make the Subj ect Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, 1 WHEREAS, Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement has requested the City 2 Council to hold public hearings to consider the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair 3 or wrecking and removal of a two-story, wood frame, single family dwelling located on property 4 hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property" and commonly known as 707 KENT ST. This 5 property is legally described as follows, to wit: ��l- 5l� 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 �a 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 this structure in accordance with a11 applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitarion or demolition of the structure to be completed within fifteen (15) days after the date of the Council Hearing; and WI�REAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul City Council on Wednesday, June 6, 2007 and the testimony and evidence including the action taken by the Legislative Hearing Officer was considered by the Council; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the testimony and evidence presented at the above referenced public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and Order concerning the Subject Property at 707 KENT STREET. That the Subject Property comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul Legislative Code, Chapter 45. 2. That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estimated to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000.00). That there now exists and has existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at the Subject Property. 4. That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible parties to correct the deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s). 5. That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been corrected. 6. That Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement has posted a placard on the Subject Property which declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition. 7. That this building has been routinely monitored by Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings. That the lrnown interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this resolution and that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 haue been fulfilled. •• � • The Saint Paul City Council hereby makes the following order: The above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting influence on the community h; :�::u�;;;*�*�r�- *�-:� �*�.��,�� �--a � ��r� „ ���,. .:ana .., +w,...t,,. er .- �a n,.a,....,, n�....,, nr ..:.......... n..;ia:_��,.� . � Y « e 0�-5�� 9� 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 by demolishing and removing the shucture in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The ��l��iea-e� demolition and removal of the shucture must be completed within fifteen (1� days after the date of the Council Hearing. 2. If the above conective action is not completed within this period of time Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement is hereby authorized to take whatever steps are necessary to demolish and remove this sh-ucture, fill the site and charge the costs incurred against the Subject Property pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. 3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Saint Paul, all personal property or fixtures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal shall be removed from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this time period. If all personal property is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and dispose of such property as provided by law. 4. It is fixrther ordered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested parties in accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul L,egislative Code Benanav Yeas Requested by Department of: Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement � Adopted by Council: Date ✓ ✓ Adoprion Certified by Council Sec:etary By: Approvedby� Date �- �� By: By: Form Approved by City Attomey By: Form Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By: �7 S/� � Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet � NH — NeighborhoodHousing/Propeny I 27-APR-07 Conqct Person & Phone: Bob Kessler 26G9073 Must 6e on Gouncil Agenda by (Date): 06-JUN-07 Doc. Type: PUBLIC HEARING (RESOLUI E-0ocumeM Required: Y Document Contact: ConWCt Phone: � Assign Number For Routing Order Totai # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature) Green Sheet NO: 3039154 0 eiehborhoodHousin¢/Prouertv 1 ' borhood Housin ro De artment Director � ��� 2 itv At[ornev �_(��'�� 3 vor•s Otlice Mavor/ASSistant 4 ou¢c7 5 i Clerk Ci Clerk CiTy Council to pass this resolution which will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the referenced building(s). If the owner fails to compty with the resolution, Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement is ordered to remove the building. The subject property is located at 707 Kent Street. ioanons: npprove (H) or rt Planning Commission CIB Committee Civil Service Commission 1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? Yes No 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? Yes No 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? Yes No Expiain all yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet Initiafing Problem, Issues, Oppatunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): This building(s) is a nuisance building(s) as defined in Chapter 45 and a vacant building as defined in Chapter 43 of the Saint Paul Legisla[ive Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties lmown to the Enforcement Officer were given an order to repair or remove the building at 707 Kent Street by Mazch 29, 2007, and have failed to comply with those orders. Advantages If Approved: The City will eliminate a nuisance. Disadvantages If Approved: The City will spend funds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessment against the property taxes. RECEIVED MAY 0 8 2007 as a special �� Disadvantages If Not Approved: � A nuisance condition will remain unabated in the City. This bwlding(s) will continue to blight the community, _ �������� Transaction: $10,000 CosURevenue Budgeted: y Fundiny source: Nuisance Housing Abatement A����tY Number: 30251 Fi nancial Infortnation: (Explain) ����''� �,� � ��� P,pril 27, 2007 1�:51 AM Page 1 07 �ib � 1�1�� : • � • ' J C 1_ . • I 707 Kent Street Legislative Hearing -1�esday, May 15, 2007 Ciry Council - Wednesday, June 6, 2007 The building is a two-story, wood frame, single family dwelling on a lot of 4,792 square feet. According to our files, it has been a vacant buIlding since January 24, 2006. The current property owner is George Farkas, per AMANDA and Ramsey county property and taYation records. The ciry has had to board this building to secure it from trespass. There have been three (3) SUMMARY ABATEMENT NOTICES issued for: - Removal of unproperly stored refuse - Secure the building On Febxuary 13, 2007, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed and photographs were taken. An ORDER TO ABATE A NUISANCE BUILDING was posted on February 27, 2007 with a compliance date of March 29, 2007. As of this date this properry remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The Vacant Building registration fees are paid. T�ation has placed an estnnated market value of $29,500 on the land and $63,900 on the building. As of March 20, 2007, a Code Compliance inspection has been completed. As of May 11, 2007, the $5 performance bond has not been posted. Real Estate taxes are current. Code Enforcement Officers estimate the cost to repair this structure is $50,000 to $60,000. The estnnated cost to Demolish is $8,000 to $10,000. NHPI, Division of Code Enforcement Resolution submitted for consideration orders the properry owner to repair or remove this structure within fifteen (15) days, if not the resolution authorizes the Division of Code Enforcement to demolish and assess the costs to the property. NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING AND O7 j�� PROPERTY IlVIPROVEMENT Dick Lippert, ManaRer of Code Enforcement CITY OF SANT PAUL Chrrstopher B Coleman, Mayor 1600 White Bear Ave N SaintPaul, MN»706 Nuisance Builtting Enforcement Tel: (651) 266-1900 Fax: (651) 266-1926 February 27, 2007 Joy Nazario 907 Oliver Ave N #2 Minneapolis MN 55411-3732 Bee Vue Lamena Vue 1292 Donegal Dr. St. Paul, MN 55125 Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) Deaz : Joy Nazario The Vacant/Nuisaace Buildings Unit, Department of Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement, hereby declares the premises located at: 707 KENT ST and legally described as follows, to wit: Legal Desa MICHEL'S SUBDNISION OF BLOCK 4, STINSON'S DNISION E 41 FT 7 TNCHES OF LOT 28 BLK 1 to comprise a nuisance condition in violation of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, Chapter 45.02, and subject to demolition under authority of Chapter 45.11. On February 13, 2007, a Building Deficiency Inspection Report was compiled and the following conditions were observed. This list of deficiencies is not necessarily ali the deficiencies present at this time. As first remedial action, a Code Compliance Inspection must be obtained from the Building Inspection and Design Sectiou, 8 Fourth Street East, Suite 200, Commerce Building (651)266-9090. That inspection will identify specific defects, necessary repairs and legal requirements to correct this nuisance condition. You may also be required to post a five thousand dollar ($5,000.00) performance bond with the Building Inspection and Design Office before any permits are issued, except for a demolition permit. This building(s) is subject to the restrictions of Saint Paul Ordinance Chapter 33.03 and shall not again be used for occupancy until such time as a Certificate of Compliance or a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. AA-ADA-EEO Employer � 7 This is a two-story, wood frame, sin�le family dwelling. Exterior 1. The chimney is defective, deteriorated or in a state of disrepair. Replace all missing or defective bricks, tuckpoint as needed to restore the chimney to a professional state of maintenance and repair. Permit may be required. 2. The eaves and soffits aze in a state of disrepair or deterioration. Repair all defects, holes, breaks, loose or rotting boards, to a professional state of maintenance. Permit may be required. The exterior walls and/or trim of the house and/or garage has defective, peeled, flaked, scaled or chalking paint or has unpainted wood surfaces. Scrape and repaint to effect a sound condition in a professional manner. 4. There aze missing or defective guardrails. Provide all stairways, porches, decks or steps which are more than 30" high with guardrails and intermediate rails with openings in the guardrail no more than four (4) inches apart and in accordance with the State Building Code. 5. The roof is deteriorated, defective, or in a state of disrepair. Repair or replace the roof covering to a sound, tight and water• impervious condition. Permit may be required. 6. The window andlor door screens are missing, defective or in a state of disrepair. Provide proper window and door screens far all openable windows and doors. Screens must be tight-fitting and securely fastened to the frames. Interior l. The bathroom floor covering is deteriarated or inadequate. Provide floor covering which is impervious to water and easily cleanable throughout the bathroom and seal around the edges and fixtures. 2. The foundation is deteriorated, defective or in a state of disrepair. Repair all foundation defects in a professional manner to a weather-tight, water-tight and rodent-proof condition. Perxnit may be required. 3. FURNACE: Have a licensed heating contractor service and clean the fumace or boiler and make any necessazy repairs. Perfonm a C/O test on the heating plant. Then, send the attached form back to the Inspector. Repair of gas fired appliances requires a permit. 4. Lack of Natural Gas Service. Immediately restore natural gas service. Failure to provide natural gas service will result in these premises being declared Unfit for Human Habitation and ardered vacated for lack of this basic facility. � 7 �/O 5. G.F.C.L: The bathroom is lacking an electrical G.F.C.I. outlet. Permit May Be Required. 6. There aze missin� or defective guardrails. Provide all stairways, porches, decks or steps which are more than 30" hi�h with guazdrails and intermediate rails with openin�s in the guardrail no more than four (4) inches apart and in accordance wlth the State Building Code. 7. The interior ceilings are defective. Repair all ceiling defects and fmish in a professional manner. 8. Lack of basic facilities. Electric and/or gas service shut off. 9. There is evidence of a rodent infestation. Immediately exterminate and eliminate ali rodents from the entire building. Remove rodent harborages in the yard areas. Tuckpoint the foundation if necessary to rodent-proof the building to prevent re-infestation. Tnunediately remove any dead rodents from the premises. 10. Sleeping room does not meet light, ventilation or escape requirements. Stop this use of this room or repair to meet sleeping room requirements. 11. DEFECTIVE STATRS. Stairs are broken, defective, or in disrepair. Repair in a professional manner. As owner, agent or responsible party, you are hereby notified that if these deficiencies and the resulting nuisance condition is not corrected by March 29, 2007 Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement, Division of Code Enfarcement, will begin a substantial abatement process to demolish and remove the building(s). The costs of this action, including administrative costs and demolition costs will be assessed against the property t�es as a special assessment in accordance with law. As first remedial action, a Code Compliance Inspection Report must be obtained from the Building Inspection and Design Section, 8 Fourth Street, Suite #200, Commerce Building, (651)266-9090. This inspection will identify specific defects, necessary repairs and legal requirements to correct this nuisance condition. As an owner or responsible �arty, you are required by law to provide full and complete disclosure of this "Order to Abate" to all interested parties, all present or subsequent renters and any subsequent owners. If you sell, transfer, or convey in any manner, the ownership or responsibility for this property, you must within seven (7) days, notify the Enforcement Officer with the names and addresses of any new owners or responsible parties. AA-ADA-EEO Employer Febtuary 27, 2007 707 KENT ST page 4 � 7���U The Bnforcement Officer is required by law to post a piacard on this property which declares it to be a"nuisance condition", subject to demolition and removal by the City. This placard shali not be removed without the written authority of the Deparhnent of Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement. The department is further required to file a copy of this "Order to Abate" with the City Clerk's Office. If conective action is not taken within the time specified in this order, the Enforcement Officer will notify the City Council that abatement action is necessary. The City Clerk will then schedule dates for Pubtic Hearings before the City Council at which time testimony will be heard from interested parties. After this hearing the City Council will adopt a resolution stating what action if any, it deems appropriate. If the resolution calls for abatement action the Council may either order the City to take the abatement action or fix a time within which this nuisance must be abated in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 33 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code and provide that if corrective action is not taken within the specified time, the City shall abate this nuisance. The costs of this action, including administrative costs will be assessed against the property as a special assessment in accordance with law. If you have any questions or request additional information please contact Mike Kalis between the hours of 8:00 and 9:30 a.m. at 651-266-1929, or you may leaue a voice mail message. Sincerely, Steve Magtler Vacant Buildings Supervisor Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement cc: Mary Erickson - Council Research Laurie Kaplan - PED Housing ota60135 3/O6 OFFICE OF LICENSE, MSPECTIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bob Kessler, Director CITY OF SAII�TT PAUL ChratopherB Coleman, Mayor March 19, 2007 COMMERCE BUILD/NG 8 Fourth Stree! Ecst, Suite 200 StPaul, Minnesotc SS10i-7024 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOt�NS1REMAX ASSOC PLUS 480 HIGHWAY 96 W STE 200 SHOREVIEW MN 55126 Re: 707 Kent St File#: 06 Ol 1998 VB3 Dear Property Owner: �� �7/d Teiephone. 651-266-9090 Facsimile� 65l-166-9099 Web: wwwirep.us Pursuant to your request the above-referenced property was inspected and the foilowing report is submitted: BUILDING l. Replace front steps. Steps are not to code. 2. Replace basement window on north side. 3. Remove all delaminated plywood flooring in the northwest, first floor room. 4. Anchor post to beam in basement. 5. Install joist hangers in basement per code, on joist with excess loading. 6. 7. 10. 11. Replace jamb on front door. Provide ventilation in second floor bathroom per code. Insure basement cellar floor is even, is cleanable, and all holes are filled. Install hand and guardrails on all stairways and steps as per attachment. Tuck point interior/exterior foundation. Provide thumb type dead bolts for all entry doors. Remove any surface bolts. 12. Repair or replace any deteriorated window sash, broken glass, sash holders, re-putty etc. as necessary. 13. Provide complete storms and screens, and repair all door and window openings. 14. Repair walls and ceilings throughout, as necessary. 15. Where wall and ceiling covering is removed, attic, replace doors and windows, (insulation, glass, weather stripping, etc.) shall meet new energy code standards. 16. Prepare and paint interiar and exterior as necessary (take the necessary precautions if lead base paint is present). 17. Habitable rooms with new usage, replaced windows shall have glass area equal to 8% of floar area, or a minimum of 8 sq. ft., one-half of which shall operate and ail bedroom windows sha11 meet emergency egress requirements (20" wide minimum, 24" high minimuxn but not less than 5.7 sq. ft. overall). AA-ADA-EEO Employer �7 PAGE 2 707 KE?�1T STREET 18. Provide general clean-up of premise. 19. Provide smoke detectors as per the Minnesota State Buildin� Code. 20. Repair soffit, fascia riim, eta as necessary. 21. Provide proper drainage azound house to direct water away from foundation. 22. Install downspouts and a complete gutter system. 23. Replace house roof covering and vent to Code. ELECTRICAL 1. Ground the electrical service to the water service within 5'of the entrance point of the water service. 2. Bond azound water meter with a copper wire sized for the electrical service per Article 250 of the NEC 3. Verify/install a separate 20 ampere laundry circuit & a separate 20 ampere kitchen appliance circuit. 4. V erify that fuse amperage matches wire size. 5. Properly strap cables and conduits in basement or service conduit on the exterior of the house. 6. Provide one (1) light for each 200 square feet in unfinished basement. One light must be switch at top of stairs. 7. Install or replace GFCI receptacle in first bathroom adjacent to the sink. 8. Ground bathroom light in first bathroom. 9. Repair or replace all broken, missing or loose light fixtures, switches & outlets, covers and plates. 10. Check a113-wire outlets for proper polarity and verify ground. 1 l. Remove any 3-wire ungrounded outlets, and replace with 2-wire, or ground 3-wire to code. 12. Through-out building, install outlets and light fixtures, as specified in Builetin 80-1. PLUMBING All plumbing work requires permit(s) and must be done by a plumbing contractar licensed in Saint Paul. Basement l. Water heater was not fired or in service. 2. Gas piping and gas venting are incorrect. 3. Water meter is removed and not in service. 4. Repair or replace all corroded, broken or leaking water piping. 5. Laundry tub is unvented and waste is incorrect. First Floor 6. Water closet is incorrectly vented and waste is incorrect. 7. Lavatory is incorrectly vented and waste is incorrect. 8. Kitchen sink is incorrectly vented and waste is incorrect. 9. Range gas connectar is incorrect. Second Floor 10. Install scald guard faucet on bathtub. d 7 PAGE3 707 KENT STREET HEATING 1. Patch chimney azound venting of fumace. Z. Clean and Orsat fumace bumer. Check ail controls for proper operation. Submit report from licensed contractor. 3. Check furnace heat exchanger for leaks, provide documentation. 4. Replace furnace flue venting and provide proper pitch for gas appliance venting. 5. Provide support for gas lines to Code. Plug, cap and/or remove all disconnected gas lines. 6. Provide heat in every habitable room and bathrooms. 7. Appropriate mechanical permits are required for this work. ZONING 1. This property was inspected as a single family home. NOTES **See attachment for permit requirements. ' There was considerable starage/clutter within property at the time of the inspection. Property is to meet appropriate Codes when complete. All items noted as recommended do not have to be completed for code compliance but should be completed at a later date. Possible purchasers of property shall be made aware of these items. **VACANT BUILDING REGISTRATION FEES MUST BE PAID AT NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING AND PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT (NHPI) FOR PERMITS TO BE ISSUED ON THIS PROPERTY**. For further information call, NHPI at 651-266-1900, located at 1600 White Bear Avenue. Sincerely, James L. Seeger Code Compliance Officer JLS:ld Attachments H � H z � r 0 r � O O N � � �" � b � � ❑ L-i biJ L�i � � � � N � � a r �d� ° � =��� N ° �Q � i ::-. i I az �s I � i � I ; z � 0 .. =-� .::a � �r o'�a I � � d t� � c� t� t� r r r U Z W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p0� °ohjo °d$o °�o °�o � � � � ��A o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �U� z o W `�av ��� z�F � � aW� + w �, � �, � F�� � � � a � - 4 4 U �" �+ � .,` r� S � T H n ,a,, F o o � r W d� N N N V � � � � � O �+ F ° ��r7 � �� v 0 Q N O ,. N O � � b M ` 0 O �:J � O � v1 ,�T � C„7 a N N d � Uj � cJ .-. � .� ^y `� ( � =a i � c� y� 4 � r s - .. V y , �J V� W u �`�' c�ry �� C%a � r�-� �, � U~ d� N N 7� � O �o x ZG`i'--1 �, v�, :����U �U.� � c o � q' " "" .x �i. "' Y^, °' o �C! �i. o O � o � .-�i L7 � � � 4Y+ �" L >' � � �� � T a � N (,J o R' �n ''�' b °� � r-�'. v�, ' F" o a� n o � O '_�.,' yC 3� O � a � U` � o�n 'd U� o 3 O�'� � �� O O N aJ "� O� �� � O � O CO yd N � O !� !� O �� FQ U U l�i d' V] .�.� J't r�' [� P-i P-i � J C� i� � r O O N l0 � C ❑ h � b h v � d 3 � � � � � � O � � �7 �o a 0 � 0 n � 0 O N � N N �, � �, � < a h � F z � 0 � r 0 0 N � � � � � � � � � N C'i � � � N ti � � � a N 0 0 c�r � N ry e ti � b � � � � � 3 � � .� x U C O V Y � �.:a ..:., ��a dr �z �� z c ., �.��: r.•� o�a � � � � p �"� 6� ] 4 P. � �5y `�'�U a`�'� a U o5z aa� �� F-F �' � � CJ � F�r z�z w�w U�� ah ��� a � H ` CJ Ri h L � �� � � �i � W � z 3 O � 0 � � � c M °� O � � 0 0 DA C � .`� W � U ~ U �� Qv � � � U u 0 � � 3; ,�-+ � ti � 7 0 ti a Date: February 13, 2007 �le #: 06 - 011997 Folder Name: 707 KENT ST PIN: 362923220113 .��.e � floor - _ ;a3:��`��:� ��� iop- Sloped floor 0 7 �eo Unapproved Sump pump connection; damaged sink Unapproved plastic piping and electrical wiring Unapproved plumbing lines Damaged and possibly open flashing around chimney Damaged and open roof covering and boards Date: February 13, 2007 File #: 06 - 011997 Folder Name: 707 KENT ST PIN: 3fi2423220113 b 7 �/o Unserviced water heater and furnace; not seen — Unapproved vent connection to furnace vent Unapproved sink drain — up hill flow Missing smoke detector Sloped lloor, missing cover plate 07-5` Date: February 13, 2007 File #: 06 - 011997 Folder Name: 707 KENT ST PIN: 362923220113 Front NEIGHBORHOOD HOtiSING AATD G 7 S�D PROPERTYIMPROVEMENT DickLippert ManagerofCodeEnforcement CITY OF SATNT PAUL Christophe Coleman, Mayo: l600 YYhtte Bear Ave N Sainz Paul, M.N i5106 April 27, 2007 1�TOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Nvisance Bv.ilding Enforcement Council President and Members of the City Council Zel: (651j 266-1900 Fax: (651) 266-1926 Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Enforcement Division has requested the City Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution ordering the repair or removal of the nuisance building(s) located at: 707 KENT ST The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows: Legislative Hearing — Tuesday, May 15, 2007 City Council Hearing — Wednesday, June 6, 2007 The owners and responsibie parties of record are: Name and Last Known Address George Parkas 10850 Tyler Ct. NE Blaine, MN 55434 Countrywide Home Loans/ Remax Assoc. Plus 480 Hwy 96 W Ste. 200 Shoreview. MN 55126 Wells Fazgo Bank NA Trustee C!O Countrywide Home Loans Inc 7105 Cozporate Dr Ptx-C-35 Plano, TX 75024-4100 Wilford & Geske 7650 Currell Blvd. Suite 300 Woodbury MN 55125 District 6 Planning Council district6�a qwestoffice.net lnterest Fee Owner Fee Owner / CCI Mortgage Holder Foreclosure Attorney Counci9 F2esearch Cerates District Council Contact �aY o7 aoo� AA-ADA-EEO Employer � 7 S/o 707 Kent Street April 27, 2007 Page 2 The legal description of this propert� is: Legal Desc: MTCHEL'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4, STINSON'S DIVISION E 41 FT 7 INCHES OF LOT 28 BLK 1 Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement has declared this building(s) to constitute a"nuisance" as defined b� Legislative Code, Chapter 45. Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement has issued an order to the then lmown responsible parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcting the deficiencies or by razing and removing this building(s). Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition remains unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighting influence of this property. It is the recommendation of the Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement that the City Council pass a resolution ordering the responsible parties to either repair, ar demolish and remove this building in a timely manner, and faiiing that, authorize the Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement to proceed to demolition and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be collected in the same manner as taaces. Sincerely, 1.+ . �� , Steve Magner Vacant Buildings Supervisor Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement SM:m1 cc: Thomas Riddering, Building Inspection and Design Judy Hanson, City Attorneys Office MaryErickson, Assistant Secretary to the Council Cindy Carlson, PED-Housing Division Stacey Millett, Invest St. Paul Disirict Council — Community Organizer pubhmg60183 May I5, 2007 Legislative Hearing Minutes 6 7' SOo Page 15 9. Ordering the owner to remove or repair the buiiding(s) at 707 Kent Street within fifteen (15) days from adoption of resolution. Mr. Magner stated the building was a rivo-story, wood frame, single-family dwelling on a lot of 4,792 square feet and had been vacant since January 24, 2006. However, he did not believe the square footage of the lot was correct as there was a mulri-housing unit that was directly in front of this property and the back of the lot where the house stood ran east and west so it appeared to be a combined square footage of the lot. George Farkas was listed as the REO representing the mortgage company and he believed he was the agent selling the property. The vacant building registration fees had been paid, the $5,000 performance bond had been posted on May 11, 2007 and a code compliance inspection had been done on Mazch 19, 2007. On February 13, 2007, an inspection of the building was done and a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed. An order to abate a nuisance building was posted on February 27, 2007 with a compliance date of March 29, 2007. To date, the property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the Legislative Code. Ramsey County Taxation has esrimated the mazket value of the land to be approximately $29,500 and the building to be $63,900. Real estate taaces were current. Code Enforcement estimates the cost to repair the building to be approximately $50,000 to $60,000. The cost for demolition was estimated to be approximately $8,000 to $10,000. There had also been three sumniary abatements issued to this property: to secure the building and the City had to board the building to secure it from irespass and to remove improperly stored refuse. Code Enforcement recommends the building be repaired or removed within 15 days. Mr. Manger presented photographs of the property. Christina Weber, Wilfard & Geske, stated she was representing the mortgage company, Countrywide Home Loans. She was not aware that the code compliance inspection had been completed and would obtain a copy to forwazd to Countrywide to determine their course of action. Ms. Moermond stated that the code compliance report was dated March 19, 2007 and was sent to Countrywide in Shareview. Ms. Weber stated that she believed that at the time the order to abate was issued, Countrywide did own the property. The sheriff sale occurred on July 13, 2006 and the redemption period expired on January 13, 2007. The order to abate was issued on February 27, 2007. She understood the order to abate was posted on the building, however, Countrywide was not provided a copy of the order pursuant to the Saint Paul Legislative Code. Mr. Magner stated that if Countrywide were the owner of the property, they had 30 days to register the building as being vacant and that they were the lawful owner of this property. Code Enforcement would ha�e certainly notified them on the order to abate if they were aware of their ownership of this properiy. Ms. W eber questioned what chapter this was under in the Legislative Code. Mr. Magner responded it was under Chapter 43, which states that an owner has 30 days to register the building as being vacant. It was not incumbent on the City to find the lawful owner of a property for notification purposes. Ms. Weber azgued that the nuisance abatement aspect of the Code did not require that her client notify Code Enforcement that they were the owner of the property; it was simply the City to give notice to the owner that the property is subject to demolition. Mr. Magner stated that they made all attempts on notifying the parties of interest based on the ownership information that they knew at that point in time. Subsequently, they did find out other ownership information which was why Ms. Weber received the public hearing notifications. Ms. Moermond questioned when Code Enforcement ordered the records for the owners and interested parties on this property. Mr. Magner stated it was ordered on February 13, 2007, which was the same May 15, 2007 Legislative Hearing Minutes 0 7-s �o Page 16 time that the buiiding deficiency inspection report was done, and it was completed on March 19, 2007. If the building had been registered during the order to abate timeframe that Countrywide had not received this notification, they would have granted an extension on the order to abate. Ms. Moermond stated that obviously someone laiew about the order to abate because the code compliance inspecrion report was done on March 19, 2007 and it usually took some time to process. Ms. Weber quesfioned when the vacant building fee had been paid. Mr. Magner stated that according to his records, it was paid on March 2, 2007 which was after the order to abate the nuisance on the building. Ms. Weber stated that they were not given a copy of the order to abate and were not granted an extension to comply with the order to abate. Mr. Magner stated that if they had contacted Code Enforcement and requested an extension on the order to abate, they would have granted the extension. He had a conversation with Mr. Farkas concerning a summary abatement that had been issued, however, there were no other conversations concerning his responsibility of the property. They would have mailed a copy of the order to abate to him if he had let them lrnow. Ms. Moermond asked when Countrywide came into possession of this property. Ms. Weber responded 7anuary 13, 2007. The property was being actively marketed and was listed on MLS and Mr. Farkas was attempting to sell the property. She requested additional time so they could get some things in order to see what they could do to save the property. Ms. Moermond asked whether Countrywide was planning to do the rehabilitation to the property as well. Ms. Weber stated that it definitely was an option. The property wasn't sold yet and it would depend upon what additional time they were granted by the City. Ms. Moermond asked Mr. Magner how they became aware this was a vacant building. Mr. Magner stated that the inspector went by the property and noticed it was open to entry. The inspector looked in the interior and saw there was water damage, mold, fallen ceiling and walls, broken and missing windows and the roof was in disrepair. In reviewing the Code Compliance Inspection Report, there was a significant amount of work that needed to be performed. Ms. Moermond questioned whether any of the summary abatements had gone to work order. Mr. Magner reviewed the file and stated that one cleanup of the yard did not go to work order, boarding ttie building did go to work order and another summary abatement to clean the yard did go to work order. The most recent summary abatements were issued on May 1, 2007 and a work order was done to cieanup the yard and they boarded up the broken windows. The cleanup of the yard included removing a tire from behind the house, broken glass around the house and miscellaneous debris around the house. The summary abatement was mailed to George Farkas and to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., trustee of Countrywide Home Loans. Ms. Moermond stated she would continue the Legislative Hearing to June 5 and the following reports and/ar documentation would need to be presented at that hearing: 1) the property must be maintained in good condirion; 2) tl�e $5,000 performance bond must be posted; 3) an approved work plan must be submitted; and 4) the purchaser must provide financial documentation indicating they had a�ailable financing to complete the rehabilitarion. If Countrywide was not going to do the rehabilitation to the building, then they would need to have a signed purchase agreement with a qualified person to perform the rehabilitarion to the buiiding. It appeared from all of the documentation presented at the hearing that there was some awazeness at Countrywide that this was a problem property especially considering the b 7-s�a May 15, 2007 Legislarive Hearing Minutes Page 17 timiug of the order to abate, the vacant building fee being paid and the code compliance inspection being done. Mr. Magner stated that someone had to lrnow since the order to abate was posted on February 28, 2007 and someone was obviously going to the property at or after that point in time. On the date he issued the summary abatement and he posted the public hearing notices, the vacant building and order to abate placazds were srili posted on the building. Ms. Moermond stated that if all of the conditions were completed by June 5, she would recommend to the City Council at the Pubiic Hearing on June 6 that they grant the owner 180 days to rehabilitate the property. If all of this documentation was not presented, she would need to consider what her recommendation would be to the City Council. Continued to the 7une 5 Legislative Hearing ��- s�o June 5, 2007 Legislative Hearing Minutes Page 9 6. Ordering the owner to remove or repair the building(s) at 707 Kent Street within fifteen (15) days from adoprion of resolution. (Continued from May 15) Ms. Weber stated that they were srill working on trying to obtain bids to do the work, therefore, a work plan and a financial plan had not been prepared. Since Countr}�wide did not have a cost estimate for the total amount of the work that needed to be done, they were not in a position on whether the building should be rehabilitated or demolished. She had been in contact with Mr. Farkas who indicated he was working on getting the bids. Concerning the bond, somehow the paperwork had been misplaced. She had been in contact with bonding company that morning and they were going to execute the documents again, have it overnight delivered and it should be filed prior to the Council hearing on 7une 6. She requested addirional tune to obtain the bids. Ms. Moermond asked whether any additional complaints had been received concerning exterior maintenance violations at the property. Mr. Magner stated that he had not recently been to the property however he reviewed the records and stated there had been no further complaints concerning the property. Ms. Moermond asked whether Countrywide was willing to afford the cost of the rehab themselves. Ms. Weber stated that since they did not have the bids on the cost of the rehab, they were not in a position to make a decision on whether they would afford that cost. She pointed out that they were still actively marketing the property for sale. Ms. Moermond stated that she would recommend laying this matter over to the June 19 Legislative Hearing and June 20 City Council Public Hearing provided the $5,000 performance bond was paid by Wednesday, June 6.