Loading...
07-454City of St. Paul RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT AMENDED - MAY 17, 2007 COUNCIL FILE NO. �5/� By_` ��� File No. SEE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for � J0608E1 (8345) Summary abatement for the excessive consumption of inspection services for property code violations at 123 Farrington St billed during September 5 to November 27, 2006. LAID OVER BY COUNCIL TO 05-15-07 TO LEG HEAR AND 05-16-07 PUBLIC HEAR A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects �a�-i�i�k, deleted. RE3tTLitEIt-i'�R`Pii£�R', kereby -be-ga�+ab3.�- rrr-9xe-�eqita-�-4�s�,�l-�eaEs- Yeas Nays Absent Benanav J Bostrom � Harris � Helgen � Lantry � Montgomery � Thune y -- 5 � � Adopted by Council: Date / �"G� Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: � � �/ Approved �� yor Date � yf? b�__ By: � o �-�sy � Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet � L D— L�. f��P 5 �� o� Lo —��b. 7�E�P 5 ��-o� PW — �bbcworks Contact Person & Phon� Juan Ortiz 266-8864 Must Be on Council Agenda by (0 Doc. Type: OTHER (DOESNT FIT ANY C E-DOCUment Required: Y Document Contact: IGm Robinson ConWCt Phone: 26G8856 08-MAY-07 � Assign Number For Routing Order Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Loeations for SignaWre) Green Sheet NO: 3Q39470 0 lic Works Juan Orfiz 1 ounc7 Erickson 2 ' C1uk At Council's request this item was laid over to S-IS-071eg heaz and 5-16-07 public hearing, ��mmary abatement for the excessive covsumpfion of inspecrion services for property code violations at 123 Farrington St. billed during September 5 to November 27, 2006. Pianning Commission CIB Committee Civii Service Commission 1. Has this personlfirtn ever worked under a conVact for this department? Yes No 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? Yes No 3. Does this personlfirtn possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? Yes No Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet Initiating Probiem, Issues, Opportunity(Who, What, When, Where, Property owners or renters create a heaith hazazd at various times throughout the Ciry of Saint Paul when their property is not kept up. The City is required by City code to clean up the property and charge the property owner for the cost of the clean up. Advantages If Approved: Cost recovery programs to recover expenses for summary abatements, gass cutting, towing of abandoned vehicles, demolitions, garbage hauling and boazdings-up. Disadvantages If Approved: None DisadvaMages H Not Approved: If Council does not approve these charges, general fund would be required to pay the assessment. •�• Transaction: $70 Funding Source: Activity Number. Financial Information: (Explain) 1 property owner will be notified of the public hearing and chazges. " ��,A.��lrt�s �'.'�.P.'?§� a.r-.. t � i '� CostlRevenue Budgeted: � � � �,l? �� May 8, 2007 8:52 AM Page 1 City of St. Paul Real Estate Division Dept. of Technology � Management Serv.COUNCIL FILE N0. ��� �j REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT File No. SEE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for J0608E1 (8345) Summary abatement for the excessive consumption of inspection services for property code violations at 123 Farrington St billed durinq September 5 to November 27, 2006. LAID OVER 8Y COUNCIL TO 05-15-07 TO LEG HEAR AND 05-16-07 PUBLIC HEAR To the Council of the City o£ St. Paul The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz: Total costs 550.00 Parks Admin Fee $ Charge-Code Enforcement $ Real Estate Service Charge $20.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES Charge To Net Assessment $70.00 570.00 Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer £urther reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $70.00 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action the o ma e considered proper. Dated S'U �Z'Qv� � �� on"and �ssessment Engineer o � -�s� F+ b x � m r m O m x m 3 ro H q x a m r m ro u H H H H ?1 n 0000 � ii bbbb murrrr �u y n [] X X X O n <P7[+J[9 H II H !fi Il] !/] ?� n nU]Ulcn [y �� [�J H H H u <aa n �mt�[� n �, I I � p O O tl ZZ2 ii qCC n 3 3 3 n ro ro ro 0 O O � � N��� 0000 O O O O O O O O x � Vi t-+ O 'dt'HN i � [_] t� w g i 2 O i A .,�cvr� � zvra� � o c�z �n � x So3� �t � v�iz � O H�nOH � 'n �o�zcn � v .. n�K N rn X � L�] O UJ N F-] N �`�J N F] Y 0 N F+ w o i � i o C2bt7 � i in O O T� � ro *HtnC7K � #1 i N! Ut H r] i O �o N HO�ro � oro y]�z � [a ��mmy°z 'y �Wvxo �Z�K � � m �yd � m� o �e I H W C H I[�] I � � O � C � �1 ��i y r-� H i x] m Nzz�� � �,.. y� � ro � o - y w ro��� w ov o i o C z � a C C i C O i i y] m b] b7 h7 i h] �� �xxx�v c����y � �mmm�o ������ [j H H H i � C C C i z �nmmm;� � ���� � �n 000� zzz� �nmm � aaa� sss� rororo� � � � � i-+ . N lft �1 N i r7 O O U 1 O i O O O O i� O O O O i F] 0 0 0 o i m '+1 i i q � �� i y i p � Y 0 0 F` i � 0000 i 'z O O O O i H I O O O O I F] 00 0o i [n i n i n � �y n � n n y II O n i qJ n n � S� � irz n v+ �n i g i�t II N Lx Lt tn i p i O II O O O O i� II• i O II O O O O i r] i O II 0000 i(!] O i F' i � N I Ky ��� � N i �p w i p7 i � �iy N�K O I H F' I t] J i N i 0 w � � N 0 � O � � � � 3 H � m W � � 3 � � R7 7y � ro ro � L] � N Apri124, 2007 Legislative Aearing Minutes 123 Farrinaton Street (J0608E) Page 4 Ms. Moermond stated that Mazk Voerding appeared prior to the hearing, on behalf of Anne Czarniecld, the property owner, and indicated that no service had been provided to the property owner during this tune period. Ms. Moermond requested a report from the inspector on this property. Mr. Betz stated orders were issued on November 17, 2005 to repair the soffits and to paint portions of the house with a compliance date of June 30, 2006. The property was re-inspected on June 30, 2006 and the work had not been done. A charge for excessive consumption in the amount of $70 was assessed to the property owner. The properry was re-inspected on November 9, 2006 and the work still had not been done. Ms. Moermond asked who the nolice was mailed to. Mr. Betz stated that the orders were mailed to James and Anne Czarniecki at 123 Farrington. No mail was returned. Mr. Betz stated that the file indicated that in July, 2006, the property owner had requested an extension of time for compliance, which was granted by the inspector, which was after the excessive consumption charge was issued. Ms. Moermond's recommendation is forthcoming. May 15, 2007 Legislative Hearing Minutes o�-�5a Page 3 Laid over Summary Abatement: J0608E Excessive Consumption of Inspecrion Services for property code violations from September 5 to November 27, 2006. 123 FarrinQton Street (J0608E) This matter was referred back to a Legislative Hearing at the May 2 City Council Public Hearing. Mr. Betz stated that according to the file, there was a note from the supervisor that the owner had contacted Code Enforcement on July 13, 2006 concerning the $70 charge for excessive consumption of inspection services far non-compliance of the June 30, 2007 compliance date. The supervisor inspectar at that time recommended deleting the assessment, however, it somehow was brought forward. He recommended deleting the assessment. Ms. Moermond recommended deleting the assessment.