07-317City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSME23T
j gp ,'�
` File
Assessment No
Voting Ward
D 7-31 �
5060�2
0764
2
33 _
In the Matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
reconstruction of concrete surfaces above existing areaway vaults abutting
the First Bank Building at 332 Minnesota Street and at the 340 Cedar Street
(Athletic Club) Building.
Preliminary Order:
Final Order:
06-325
06-433
approved
approved
04/OS/06
O5lo3/06
WBEREAS, A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the
above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by
the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be
it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all
respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby
determined to be payable in one to twenty equal installments.
Yeas Nays Absent
Benanav �
Bostrom
Harris ,/
Helgen
Lantry ,i
Montgomery y/
Thune ,/
Adopted by the Council: Date: ��
Certified Passed by the Council Secretary
BY ' lS
�
Mayor
City of St. Paul
REPORT OF
OF ASSESSMENT
COUNCIL FILE NO
File No.
Assessment No
Voting Ward
In the Matter of the assessment of benefits,
reconstruction of concrete surfaces above existing
the First Bank Buildinq at 332 Minnesota Street and
(Athletic Club) Building.
Preliminary Order: 06-325 approved
Final Order: 06-433 approved
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
c� 7
506002
07 64
2
cost and expenses for
areaway vaults abutting
at the 340 Cedar 5treet
04/OS/06
OSl03l06
The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the
following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in
connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total construction costs
Engineering and Inspection
Valuation and Assessment Services
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Charge To
Net Assessment
$238,987.67
$
$ 15,534.20
$254,521.87
$
$254,521.87
Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and
levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $254,521.87 upon
each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improvement,
and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits
conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto
attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer,
and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is
herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered
proper. � /
2 �� � � '
Dated � �`� �
� �,
aluat on an sess t Engineer
� Green 5heet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sfieet �
�7
PW —r�,vsowo�
Contact Person & Phone:
Juan Q�Uz
266-8864
28-FEB-07
' I �z-Fee-m
Doc. Type: OTHER (DOESNT FI7 ANY C
E-Document Required: Y
Document ContaM: John Saumweber
Conqct Phone: 266-8851
■♦
Assign
Number
For
RoWing
Order
Total # nf Signature Pages _{Clip NI tacations for Signature)
Green Sheet NO: 3036950
0 �Public Works � Jaan Ortiz r
1 Civic Center { Marv Erickson
2 CiriCierk I ShariMoore
Set date of public hearing to ratify the assessments for the reconshuction of sidewalk at the First Banlc and AthLetic Club buildings.
File No. 506002 Assessment No. 0764
itlauons: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Answer the Follow(ng Questions:
Planning Commission �, ��ry� ��onlfirm ever warked under a contract for this department?
CIB Committee Yes No
Civil Service Commission 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this person/firtn possess a skill not normaily possessed by any
current citY �PbYee? .
Yes No
Euplaln all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet
initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Wha, What, When, Where, Why):
Work has been completed. Ratifica6on is necessary in order to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the pmject.
Advantages If Approved:
Same as above.
�
Disadvantages If Approved:
Property owners will have assessments payabte via properiy ta�ces.
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
Transaction: $Z5d�52�.87
Funding Source: /�SS2SSfIleMS
Financial lnformatiorc
(Explain)
CosURevenue Budgeted: y
ActiVity Number:
February 12, 2007 1:42 PM Page 1