The URL can be used to link to this page

214859s1 ORIGINAL TO CITY CLERK 214859 p V CITY OF ST. PAUL FILE ONCIL NO. _ OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK ' n U. File No. 214859 —By George J. COUNCIL RESOLUTION — GENERAL FORM .;oulis. Mayor—' k PRESENTED BY COMMISSION ;solved, By the Council of the City Saint Paul, upon public hearing DATE jivant to said Council's prior Res - laon, C. F. No. 214615, apprw�,� 'Igember 10; 1963, and upm,'. -'r`-- lderAtir-1 of the ar;rti-,td .S ZOO t ,;e +b SD31 cS, RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Saint Paul, upon public hearing pursuant to said Council's prior Resolution, C. P. go. 214615, approved September 10, 1963,'and upon due consideration of the application of Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, for said Council's approval of said Authority's Redevelopment Plan for Cathedral Area Renewal Project,, Minn. R -25, dated August, 1963,'(designated under said Resolution as "Redevelopment -Plan for Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project, Minn. R -25 dated August, 1963 "'),and for said Council's approval of said project: WHEREAS, under the provisions of Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, the Housing and Home Finance Administrator is authorized to provide financial assistance to Local Public Agencies for undertaking and carrying out urban renewal projects; and 4MREAS it is provided in such Act that contract for financial aid thereunder shall require that the Redevelopment Plan for the respective project area be approved by the governing body of the locality in which the project is situated and that such approval include findings by the governing body that: (1) the financial aid to be provided in the contract is necessary to enable theroject to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan; (2).:tPgq, Redevelopment Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the Locality as a whole,-for the rehabilitation or redevelopment of the urban renewal area by private enterprise; (3) the Redevelopment Plan conforms to a general plan for the development of the locality as a whole; and (4) the Redevelopment Plan gives due consideration to the provision of adequate park and recreational areas and facilities, as may be desirable for neighborhood improvement, with special consderation for the health, safety, and welfare of children residing in the general vicinity of the site covered by the Plan; and WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota (herein called the "Local Public Agency ") has entered into a planning contract for financial assistance under such act with the United States of America, acting by and through the Housing and Home Finance Administrator, pursuant to which Federal funds were provided for the urban COUNCILMEN Yeas Nays Dalglish Holland. Loss Mortinson Peterson Rosen Mr. President, Vavoulis 10M 6-62 In Favor Against Adopted by the Council 19— i Z X859 renewal project (herein called the "Project ") identified as "Cathedral Area Renewal Plan Project, No. Minn. R -25" and encompassing the area bounded by Beginning at the point of intersection of the southern right-of-way line of Carroll Avenue with the western right -of -way line of Cathedral Place, then southerly along said line of Cathedral Place to the point of intersection with the southern right -of -way line of Marshall Avenue, then westerly along said line to the point of intersection with the eastern right -of -way line of Arundel Street, then northerly along said line to the point of intersection with the northern right -of -way line of Marshall Avenue, then westerly along said line to the point of intersection with the western right -of -way line of Arundel Street, then northerly along said line to the point of intersection with the southern right= of--way line of the alley between Rondo and Carroll Avenues, then easterly along said alley line 263.375 feet to the point of intersection with a lot line, then southerly along said lot line to the point of intersection with the southern right -of -way line of Carroll Avenue, then easterly along said line to the point of-intersection with the western right -of -way line of Cathedral Place which is the point of binning in the City of Saint Paul, State of Minnesota, (herein called the "Locality "); and WHEREAS the Local Public Agency has applied for additional financial assistance under such Act and proposes to enter into an additional contract or contracts with the Housing and Home Finance Agency for the undertaking of, and for making available additional financial assistance for, the Project; and WHEREAS the Local Public Agency has made detailed studies of the location, physical condition of structures, land use, environmental influences, and social, cultural, and economic conditions of the Project area and has determined that the area is a blighted area and that it is detrimental and a menace to the safety, health, and welfare of the inhabitants and users thereof and of the Locality at large, because of dilapidation, obsolescence, faulty arrangement and de!hgt, deleterious land use and obsolete layout and the members of this Governing Body have been fully apprised by the Local Public Agency and are aware of these facts and conditions; and WHEREAS there has been prepared and referred to the Council of the Locality (herein called the "Governing Body ") for rVview and approval a Redevelopment Plan for the Project area, dated August, 1963, and consisting of 12 pages and four (4) maps supported by the following supplementary material, data, and recommendations, which material, data, and recommendations are not a part of said Urban Renewal Plan: -2- 1. Final Project Report, Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project Minn. R -25 2. Statement of Method For Financing Cathedral Area "Urban Renewal Project Minn. R -25 3. Relocation Program; :.. 21 4 WHEREAS a statement of the method proposed for financing of the Project has been submitted to the Governing Body, with and accompanying the Redevelopment Plan for the Project area; and WHEREAS said Redevelopment Plan has been approved by the Governing Body of the Local Public Agency, as evidenced by resolution of the Local Public Agency dated Septe&er 4, 1963 of said Body's duly certified resolution approving said Redevelopment Plan, which is attached hereto; and WHEREAS the Planning Board of the City of Saint Paul, which is the duly designated acting official planning body for the Locality, has pre- pared and adapted a Comprehensive Plan by resolution dated April 19, 1963, which Plan implements the Preliminary Guide Plan adapted April 11, 1958, and is recognized and used as a guide for the general development of the Locality as a whole; and WHEREAS, the said Planning Board has considered and examined the Redevelopment Plan for the Project area and has submitted to the Gov- erning Body its written opinion, by resolution adopted September 3, 1963, hat the objectives and purposes of the Redevelopment Plan conform to the objectives and propaals of the Comprehensive Plan for the Locality, and the Governing Body has duly considered said written opinion of the Planning Board; and WHEREAS said Redevelopment Plan for the Project area prescribes certain land uses for the Project area and will require,-among other things, changes in zoning, the vacating and removal of streets, alleys, and other public ways, the establishment of new street patterns, the location and relocation of sewer and water mains and other public facilities, and other public action; and WHEREAS the Local Public Agency has prepared and submitted a pro - gram for the relocation of families that may be displaced as a result of carrying out the Project in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS there have also been presented to the Governing Body information and data respecting the relocation program which has been prepared by the Local Public Agency as a result of studies, surveys, and inspections in the Project area and the assembling and analyses of the data and information obtained from such studies, surveys, and inspections; and -3- 21m,59 WHEREAS the members of the Governing Body have general knowledge of,the conditions prevailing in the Project area and of the availability of proper housing in the Locality for the relocation of families that may be displaced from the Project area and, in the light of such knowledge of local housing conditions, have carefully considered and reviewed such proposals for relocation; and WHEREAS it is necessary that the Governing Body take appropriate official action repecting the relocation program and said Redevelopment Plan for the Project, in conformity with the contracts for financial assistance between the Local Public Agency and the United States of America, acting by and through the Housing and Home Finance Administrator; and WHEREAS the Governing Body is cognizant of the conditions that are imposed in the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects- with Federal financial assistance under Title I. including those prohibiting discrimination because of race, color,,creed, or national origin: . that said Council, having heard all parties concerned and considered all evidence presented germane to said application, and being fully advised in the premises, does hereby make the following findings of fact and grant:, the following approvals sought by said application: 1. Tht it is hereby found and determined that the Project is a blighted area and qualifies as an eligible Project area under Minnesota Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act. 2. That said Redevelopment Plan for the Project aforementioned, having been duly reviewed and considered, is hereby approved, and the City Clerk be and is hereby,directed to file said copy of said Redevelopment Plan with the minutes of this meeting. �3. That it is hereby found and determined that said Redevelopment Plan for the Project area conforms to said Comprehensive Plan for the Locality. 4. That it is hereby found and determined that the financial aid provided and to be provided pursuant'to said contracts for Federal financial assistance pertaining to the 'Project• is nec.essary_ to enable the Project to' be. undertaken in accordance with the.Redev?lopment Plan for the Project area. 5. That it is hereby found and determined that the ab6ve' mentioned• Redevelopment Plan for the Urban Renewal Area.will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the Locality as a whole, for the urban renewal of such areas by private enterprise. 6. That it is hereby found and determined that.the Redevelopment Plan for the Urban Renewal Area gives due consideration to the provision of adequate park and recreational areas and facilities, as may be desirable for neighborhood improvement, with special consideration for the health safety, and welfare of children,residing in the general vicinity of the site covered by the Plan. -4- ORIGINAL TO CITY CLERK 21-4859 CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK FILE NO. _ COUNCIL RESOLUTION — GENERAL FORM PRESENTED BY - COMMISSIONER DATE 7. That it is hereby found and determined that the program for the proper relocation of the families displaced in carrying out the Project in decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings in conformity with acceptable standards is feasible and can be reasonably and timely effected to permit the proper prosecution and completion of the Project; and that such dwellings or dwelling units available or to be made available to such displaced families are at least equal in number to the number of displaced families, are not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities than the dwellings of the displaced families in the Project area, are available at rents or prices within the financial means of the displaced families, and are reasonably accessible to theirplaces of employment. 8. That in order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Redevelopment Plan hereby approved it is found and determined that certain official action must be taken by this Body with reference, among other things, to (changes in zoning, the vacating and removal of streets, alleys, and other public ways, the establishment of new street patterns, the location /and reloca- tion of sewer and water mains and other public facilities, and other public action), and, accordingly, this Body hereby (a) pledges its - cooperation in helping to carry out such Redevelopment Plan; (b) requests the various officials, departments, boards, and'agencies o.f the Locality having administra- tive responsibilities in the premises likewise i;o cooperate to such end and to exercise their respective functions,and powers in a manner consistent with said Redevelopment Plan; and (c) stands ready io consider and take appropriate,,r`- action upon proposals and measures designated to effectuate said Redevelopment Plan. 9. That additional financial assistance under the provisions of Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended,-is necessary to enable the land in the Project area to be renewed'in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan for the Project area and, accordingly, the filing by the Local Public Agency of an application or applications for such financial assistance under said Title I is hereby approved. 10. That said Council does hereby approve said Redevelopment Plan and said Project which constitutes the subject of the same. SEP 2 5 15b� COUNCILMEN Adopted by the Council -- 19— Yeas DalglishNays SEP 25 1963 � - Holland proved 19— LossTT — In Favor Mortinson r Peterson Mayor Rosen Against Mr. President, Vavoulis , - - - ; ions "2 -5- CITY PLANNING BOARD OF SAINT PAUL 1315 Courthouse _5�, RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA approving v� Redevelopment Plan for Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project, Minna R -259 dated August,, 19630 WHEREAS Minnesota Statutes 1953, State Edition, Section462o515 and 462.521 provide that the planning agency of the municipality in which a redevelopment pro- ject is proposed to be undertaken shall provide a written opinion concerning such project NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Planning Board cif the City of Saint Paul, that having considered the proposal," "Redevelopment Plan for Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project Minn., R-25," dated August, 1963, which proposal con- sists oft Ao Table of Contents B. Description of Project It J9 C! rr r !9, 7,,., la Boundary Map #' 2, Boundary Description SEp 9- 1963 3. Types of Proposed Renewal Actions CORPORATION Ca Land Use Plan LIVuNOLL la Proposed Land Use 2, Land Use Provisions and Building Requirements Do Project Proposals la Land Acquisition 2, Redeveloper's Obligations Ea Other Provisions Necessary to Meet State and Local Requirements 1, Non - Discrimination 2, Other Actions Necessary Fa Procedure for Changes-in Approved Plan Map Exhibits to Plan Map No, 1 Boundary Map Map No., 2 Proposed Land Use . Map Non 3 Proposed Rights- of-way Map Noe 4 Acquisition Map The City Planning Board now advises the Saint Paul City Council, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, and all others that it is the opinion of the City Planning Board of Saint Paul, Minnesota, that the objectives and purposes of said Redevelopment Plan conform to the Comprehensive Plan objectives and proposals of the City of Saint Paul and the adoption of this resolution signifies ap- proval, of this proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project, Minna R-25a Adopted by the City Planning Board of Saint Paul on Tuesday, September 39 19633 by a vote of �9� ayes and 0 nayesa A quorum was present Certified to be a true and correct copy: Director of City Planning Custodian of Planning Board Minute Books OFFICE OF CITY CLERK BUREAU OF RECORDS 386 City Hall and Court House St. Paul 2, Minnesota Sept. 24, 1963 MRS. AGNES H. O'CONNELL City Clerk HAROLD J. RIORDAN Council Recorder RECIVW, r S E P 24 1963 CORPORAnwi t,UUNSEL W. Donald L. Lais Corporation Counsel B Wilding Dear Sir: The City Council requested that you draw a resolution expressing their approval of the Redevelopment Plan for the Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project Minn. R -25, as described in the attached file. very truly yours, I City Clerk - CITY OF SAINT PAUL - MINNESOTA S M HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1 OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL September 6, 1963 55 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL 1, MINN. CApital 7 -7523 HAROLD J. MORIARTY Chairman B. WARNER SHIPPEE CARL CUMMINS, JR. Executive Director PATRICK J. TOWLE JOHN W. GREENMAN Honorable Mayor and City Council EUGENE R. LAMBERT C/o City Clerk Room 356 City Hall and Court House Saint Paul, Minnesota Gentlemen: There is herewith submitted the Redevelopment Plan for the Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project Minn. R -25, together with the Final Project Report, Relocation Program, a statement of Method Proposed For Financing Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project Minn. R -25, Resolution of the City Planning Board embodying its written opinion of the Plan, and a Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority approving the Redevelopment Plan. The Authority requests that your Honorable Body set a date for public hearing on the Redevelopment Plan and cause a notice of the hearing to be published in the Saint Paul Dispatch- Pioneer Press not less than 10 days prior to the date of such hearing, all in conformity with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521. The Authority further requests approval of the Plan following the public hearing. Encs. 1,' 1 -1 l EI 1, r. 4`7•i Inn; Respectfully submitted, Q Wowi � B. Warner Shipp ee �H Executive Director n , ') al lv REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINN. R -25 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA AUGUST 1963 i TABLE Or COM -11TS Paf*e No. 1. The Plan comprises the following: A. Table of Contents 1 B. Description of Project 4 1. Boundary PYap 4 2. Boundary Description 4 3. Types of Proposed Renewal Actions 5 a. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 5 b. City of Saint Paul 6 c. Board of Education of the City of Saint Paul 6 C. Land Use Plan 6 1. Proposed Land Use 6 a. Proposed Rights -of -Way 6 b. Utilities 6 c. Other Land Uses 7 2. Land Use Provisions and Building Requirements 7 a. Statement of Uses to be Permitted 7 b. Regulations and Controls 7 c. Duration of Controls 10 d. Applicability of Controls to Real Property Not to be Acquired 10 D. Project Proposals 10 1. Land Acquisition 10 a. Real Property Identified for Acquisition 10 b. Real Property Hot Now Identified for Acquisition 11 -1- 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page No. c. Properties Identified Which May Later Be Exempted From Acquisition 11 2. Redeveloper's Obligations 12 E. Other Provisions Necessary to Meet State and Local Requirements 12 1. Non - Discrimination 12 2. Other Actions Necessary 12 F. Procedure for Changes in Approved Plan 12 -2- MAP.EXHIBITS TO PLAN MAP NO. I BOUNDARY MAP MAP NO. 2 PROPOSED LAND USE MAP NO. 3 PROPOSED RIGHTS -OF -WAY MAP NO. 4 ACQUISITION MAP -3- 11 B. Description of Project 1. Boundary Map - The boundaries of the Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project are shown on Map. No. 1, Boundary Map. 2. Boundary Description - The boundary description of Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project Area (part of the " Cathedral" General Neigh- borhood Renewal Plan Area), Minn. 25 is as follows: A tract of land situtatied in the City of Saint Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the southern right- of-way line of Carroll Avenue with the western right -of -way line of Cathedral Place, then southerly along said line of Cathedral Place to the point of intersection with the southern right -of -way line of Marshall Avenue, then westerly along said line to the point of inter- section with the easterly right -of -way line of Arundel Street, then northerly along said line to the point of intersection with the northern right -of -way line of Marshall Avenue, then westerly along said line to the point of intersection with the western right -of -way line of Arundel Street, then northerly along said line to the point of intersection with the southerly right -of -way line of the alley (or extension thereof where no alley exists) between Rondo and Carroll Avenues, then easterly along said alley line 263.375 feet to the point of intersection with a lot line, then southerly along said lot line to the point of intersection with the southern right- of-way line of Carroll Avenue, then easterly along said line to the point of intersection with the western right -of -way line of Cathedral Place which is the point of beginning. -4- 3. Types of Proposed Renewal Actions Proposed renewal actions in the Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project comprise a combination of the following activities - acquisition, clearance, sale, and reuse of property; vacation and dedication of public rights -of -way; public works, and controls and restrictions. a. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul activities, basically, will include the acquisi- tion of properties, demolition of structures, site prepara- tion, relocation of families, disposition of land for public and private use, construction of necessary streets and utilities that are completely of benefit to the Project (with the exception of the Technical - Vocational High School improvements) and the enforcement of building requirements herein established for Project land. Included in these activities are the following: (1) A complete resurfacing of Western Avenue from Marshall Avenue to Carroll Avenue. (2) Virginia Avenue, from Marshall Avenue to Iglehart Avenue will be resurfaced and a new cul -de -sac including pavement, with gutter and sidewalk, will be constructed at Iglehart. New curbs, gutters and sidewalk will be constructed along the east side of Virginia Avenue from Marshall to the above - noted cul -de -sac. (3) Installation of a new storm sewer in existing Virginia Avenue from Iglehart to Carroll'Avenue. -5- b. The approval of this Plan by the City Council indicates acceptance by the City of Saint Paul of its responsibility to finance and carry out those elements of the Plan re- quiring City Action without assessment against land within the project boundaries as contained in separate Coopera- tion Agreements. c. The Saint Paul Board of Education shall be responsible for all site preparation and improvements necessary within the site designated on Map No. 2, Proposed Land Use for the new Technical- Vocational School. Included in such site prepar- ation are: removal of existing street pavements, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; abandonment or removal of existing utilities; installation of such public utilities which are necessary to maintain connections within the systems or will be necessary for the proposed redevelopment of the Urban Renewal Project; and development as necessary of the Public Open Space for recreational purposes. C. Land Use Plan 1. Proposed Land Use - Proposed land use in the project area is shown on Map No. 2, Proposed Land Use. a. Thoroughfare and Street Right -of -Way - All major thorough- fares, public streets and rights -of -way are shown on Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way, and are subject to minor modification only. b. Utilities, Public Uses and Institutional Uses. -6- (1) Utilities - All public utilities, existing or to be provided, will be within easement or right -of -way lines as shown on Map No. 2, Proposed Land Use. (2) Public Uses - The area generally bounded by the right- of -way line of Interstate Freeway Route No. 94, Marshall Avenue, Cathedral Place and Virginia Street is proposed as the site for a new Technical - Vocational High School and community recreational facilities. (3) Institutional Uses - Institutional uses are shown on Map No. 2, Proposed Land Use. c. Other land uses not covered by C la or C lb above are shown on Map No. 2, Proposed Land Use. 2. Land Use Provisions and Building Requirements. a. Statement of uses to be permitted. Land uses permitted within the project area as shown on Map No. 2, Proposed Land Use are: (1) Medium Density Residential (2) Institutional (Public and Private) (3) Parks and Public Recreation b. Regulations and Controls Residential (Medium Density) (1) Permitted Uses: Rowhouses, multi - family garden apart- ments. Alternate Use: Institutional. (2) Minimum Lot Area Per Family: Multi- family rowhouses and garden type apartments - 2,175 square feet. -7- 0 (3) Minimum Spacing of Buildings: Buildings within the same parcel, having exterior walls directly facing one another, shall not be spaced closer than the combined sum of the respective wall heights measured to the eave lines. (4) Minimum Front Yards: 20 feet from all street rights- of -way. (5) Minimum Side Yards: 10 feet from adjacent lot lines. (6) Maximum Net Building Coverage: 357.*. (7) Maximum Total Building and Hard Surface Area Coverage: 70 %. (8) Minimum Off- Street Parking: Family type dwelling units - One parking space for each dwelling unit. Special Residential Uses - Adequate parking should be provided.** (Housing for the Elderly, Convalescent Homes and Insti- tution affiliated residential uses) (9) Minimum Parking Lot Setback: 10 feet from street rights- of -way and all property lines. (10) Maximum Height: 40 feet. * Percent of Net Residential Land Area covered or intended to be covered by the major buildings. ** In each case, the adequacy of parking to be provided will be determined by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and City Planning Board of the City of Saint Paul. Building and site plans of the proposed uses will be re- viewed with respect to the specific parking needs of any proposed building in terms of its function. -8- Institutional (1) Permitted Uses: Public and private institutions of a religious, educational, eleemosynary, or philanthropic nature (as well as Staff Housing and related uses), including: Schools, Places of Worship, Parks and Playgrounds, Athletic Facilities, Affiliated Institu- tidnal uses, and Service Facilities related to or primarily serving the permitted uses; Parking Lots and structures. Alternate Use! Medium Density Residential. (2) Building Setback: 25'feet from all street rights -of- way and 10 feet from all property lines, excepting the westexn right -of =way line of Cathedral Place if vacated. (3) Maximum Floor Area Ratio: l:l* (4) Maximum Net Building Coverage: 35% (5) Maximum Total Building and Hard Surface Coverage: 70% (6) Off- Street Parking: Philanthropic and Eleemosynary Institutions: High Schools: Places of Worship: No parking shall be per- mitted in required setbacks. One parking space shall be provided for each three employees. Adequate parking shall be provided.** Adequate parking shall be provided.** (7) Minimum Parking Lot Setback: 10 feet from street rights- of -way and all property lines. * The Floor Area Ratio expresses the relationship between the allowable floor area .of a building and the gross area of the lot i.e., a Floor Area Ratio of 1:1 would allow the floor area in a building to equal the area of the lot upon which the building would be erected. ** In each case, the adequacy of parking to be provided will be determined by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and City Planning Board of the City of Saint Paul. Building and site plans of the proposed uses will be reviewed with respect to the specific parking needs of any proposed building in terms of its function. -9- (8) Off- Street Loading: One berth for public and private uses over 10,000 square feet. (The berth is to be no less than 300 square feet. All loading areas shall be screened by landscaping or architectural treatment.) (9) Maximum Height: 75 feet, but not over 40 feet for any portion of a structure within 75 feet of a right -of -way or property line. c. Duration of Controls - The regulations and controls incorpor- ated in the deeds conveying land to the redeveloper shall be maintained and continued in effect for a period of thirty (30) years from the date of original approval of the Plan by the City Council of Saint Paul. d. Applicability of Controls to Real Property Not to be Acquired. The regulations and controls of this plan shall be applicable to property in a clearance area which is not to be acquired when the owner thereof acquires project land, excepting where proposed setbacks may impose unreasonable restrictions upon existing structures. e. In the event of conflict between these regulations and controls and the provisions of the Legislative Code of the City of Saint Paul, the higher standard shall apply. D. Project Proposals 1. Land Acquisition a. Real Property Identified for Acquisition (1) Map No. 1 and Map No. 4 identify all properties proposed to be acquired for clearance and redevelopment. -10- (2) Ali land to be acquired for public facilities and other uses is shown on Map No. 1, Boundary Map. b. Real Ptopeity Not Now Identified for Acquisition. Property not now identified for acquisition may be ac- quired 'and structures demolished in the event of a: 1) change of use, 2) deterioration; damage, or lack of maintenance which makes such property a blighting influence, or 3) any violation which would bring such property out of conformance with the intent of the Plan. kesidentiad properties not now identified for acquisition must conform to the applicable building density, coverage and off - street parking requirements placed upon any structure in a "C" Residence District as specified in the Legislative Zoning Code of the City of Saint Paul. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul shall be authorized to acquire such properties if they fail to conform to all such requirements. c. Properties Identified Which May Later Be Exempted from Acquisi- tion. Properties herein identified to be acquired which may later be exempted from acquisition will include those proper- ties designated for acquisition and reuse which in the interim have been acquired by an adjacent retained use; provided, however, that the buildings on such properties are demolished and the land redeveloped in accordance with this Plan and the Regulations and Controls as herein established; and further provided that such exempted properties do not prohibit the adequate disposition and redevelopment of the adjacent project land. -11- 2. Redeveloper's Obligations. The redevelopers, their successors or assigns, will be required by contract to observe all provisions of this Plan, and they will further be required to submit a redevelopment progress schedule satisfactory to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul. Redevelopers will not be permitted to defer the start of construction for a period longer than that required to prepare architectural plans; obtain satisfactory financing for the review and approval o£ such plans of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul in order to establish its conformance with this Plan; generally, not to exceed a period of two years. E. Other Provisions Necessary to Meet State and Local Requirements. 1. Non - Discrimination Every contract for the sale, lease, or redevelopment of pro- perty within the project area will include prohibitions against land speculation, require compliance with all state and local laws in effect from time to time; prohibit discrimination or segregation by reason of race, religion, color, or national origin in the sale, lease, or occupancy of the property; and require that this latter provision be made a covenant running with the land and be binding upon the redeveloper and every successor in interest to the pro- perty. 2. Other Actions Necessary. Street vacations and dedications shall be accomplished by separate actions in accordance with state law and local ordinances. F. Procedures for Changes in Approved Plan. The Redevelopment Plan may be modified at anytime by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul in the manner provided by law. -12- Rill rMI 0 ' D R EP —aI -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - � C] O p : o a Q z a o :o o� 0 0 0 ■ o r rot ICU earaw- WE II a I a m� °n - i 7 ► < �m Om c �3pD 0A to CmZm i —4 rV1p C n D6 30 $ I 2 Ors. Z �D Z-1 1 W; A A ZI mn��m na D� 3 Ou D as � -1 o > 0 �n i'o D `m ►i { 6, I I: I� I I >•rr � I I I -� II II �I 11'K II II II II I� I� II 11- II II Fu JAVCNVE II b. II CO ?' f O c 9 9 O Z O a a O m Q 3 O � z z z a FMAW Ir ISM Id�M1:Sel�a':d 3i•]: �avdE911' ��I ®P'iw9�ed �INfA�IF Y=om !9!I n'1�1€0? r^ W IM ag OEM im E . Eff I Ed R r MAIN a m� °n - i 7 ► < �m Om c �3pD 0A to CmZm i —4 rV1p C n D6 30 $ I 2 Ors. Z �D Z-1 1 W; A A ZI mn��m na D� 3 Ou D as � -1 o > 0 �n i'o D `m ►i { 6, I I: I� I I >•rr � I I I -� II II �I 11'K II II II II I� I� II 11- II II Fu JAVCNVE II b. II CO ?' f O c 9 9 O Z O a a O m Q 3 O � z z z a ACKVOIN N lz V N Zf- VIRGINIA R A, 10 2i.0 r < F LAOIS SL z -1 0 O OEM - >< m cm 0 0 ;9 3 -C P, 'o 0= zz '>" -M zi -F ,z mr 0 CA Z m rr, IM. 0 " "1 X15 om� K,j > z Z > M Z m m u > 0 M In z -1 c 0 m . (,) —4 a rn r > 0 0 z m Di J WESTERN lk AVENUE VIRGINIA I CT LOUIS STREET IT EASEDEAL rq 52 o'i fm p ~ ZUT IR - - �«o o .� �, _ .z ter, - - a �o Q ter. �: �.�� n K=m M2. D �_ I m ■ MERM '�I.Ip, ^.q ail:. �.. US 111.■ ��lll.■ 1?e Ii1.. 7.1.. III.I : er II.IIi^"1-Inl...N .1 �rx�w�rrM% , �C ':��9■ MEI ■ ■ u;; ewl 1 11 p��' :TyyT ,I E;�.y�w�.v.�y . yy�..yn.pyyrlyyyyIl�yyly.y.y.l.��, rYjl ..ry�r I t I Y •�.pq�1 ■ ! � ii y�ji � : : :i 1 �7R671877 u.uu.rrda�a:aiau.r.-.:r.:.a:.: se. eo.e.e.e.r.e.ee.•v.:.........•n 'i 7 Q� � i 1 Iml..,7X f :li1C MIM NET., FICA, Elm ml NW-7 a 1� ■� •i7�tn!�,1q��11111i.�.= .1M�:u_ �'� I OC 'r =i�1G�"df'�lL�Ee;i,(illdlll' 11.1 qlp l5ip�. - -- 7 Y NISI I n s • • c September, 1963 Housing and Redevelopment tuthority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota RELOCATION PROGMAM FOR THE CATHEDRAL AREA Lml'iAIN KENEWAL PROJECT The Housing and Redevelopment Authority is charged with the responsibility for determining in advance of engaging in an urban renewal project that housing resources are or will be available to meet the needs of families to be displaced by the project. After property has been acquired the Authority is further respon- sible for assisting families and individuals find suitable standard housing within their means. This report summarizes information concerning the families and in- dividuals within Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project based on a 100% survey con- ducted by the Authority. It also contains estimates of the resources available to meet the need and briefly describes the organization and procedure established to assist displaced families and individuals. These data are based on the Reloca- tion Report which constitutes part of the Final Project Report approved by Resolu- tion No. 63 -5/8 -5 of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, which has been submitted to the Council of the City of Saint Paul. The Relocation Report demonstrates that there are available or will be pro- vided in the project or in other areas not less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of families displaced from the project area, decent, safe and sanitary dwellings equal in number to such displaced families. Number of Families and Individuals to be Displaced The Cathedral Urban Renewal Project I will displace 328 families with two or more members, 176 individuals living in separate dwelling units and 16 roomers. These families and individuals are divided between white and non -white as follows: - 2 - Total U-bite Novi!-White Families 323 256 72 Individual Householders 176 147 29 Roomers 16 14 2 One hundred eight of the families own their own homes and 220 rent. Thirty- six individual householders are owners while 140 are renters. Most of the families and individuals are of middle or low income. One hundred ninety -sips qualify for low -rent public housing operated by the Authority. The following table classifies families' estimated annual income: White Non -White Under $4000 109 44 $4000 to $5999 64 11 $6000 and over 33 5 Not Reported 50 12 Of the 327 families of one or more persons 143 are couples, 86 are families of 3 or 4 persons, 53 are families of 5 or 6 persons while 41 are families of 7 or more persons, Housing Resources The Authority's schedule calls for the beginning of land acquisition and relocation in November, 1963 and their completion by the end of 1965 although the period can be extended if all families have not been satisfactorily relocated by that date. The attached Table shows the estimated number of families and individuals to be displaced by this project and other renewal and public housing projects - 3 - between now and the end of 1965. These figures are subject to change and probably are high as some may have moved out before the land is acquired. A maximum of 455 families and individuals will need to be relocated in 1964 and 347 in 1965. To meet this need the community has the following resources: A. Turnover in existing public housing apartments B. New public housing to become available C. Existing private housing D. New private housing. Public Housing The Housing and Redevelopment Authority now owns and operates 1544 apartments in the following locations: Number McDonough Homes 562 Roosevelt Homes 320 Mt. Airy 446 Valley Apartments 200 West Side Duplexes 16 During the past year 350 apartments have become available through turnover. By 1965 turnover will probably increase to 450 with the availability of 578 addi- tional units. As families displaced by urban renewal and other government action have first priority for these apartments, Cathedral Project families will have the additional resource of the following new apartments which will become available during 1964 and 1965: Neill Apartments Central Apartments Dunedin Terrace (West Side) New Private Housing - 4 - When Available Elderly Family January; 1964 139 16 January, 1964 _ 144 42 1965 127 108 Real Estate Research Corporation has estimated that 1050 new apartments and houses will be privately built in St. Paul annually on an average between 1960 and 1968. Among these will be 140 rental units in Cathedral Project I built at moderate rentals with FHA mortgage assistance under FHA Title 221 D 3 and a number of apartments for the elderly sponsored by churches and other non- profit organizations. Existing Private Housing Based on Federal Census data it is estimated that over 15,000 families move each year in St. Paul. Of these about 12,000 move to apartments or houses they rent while over 3,000 buy houses. At any one time between 2,500 and 3,000 hous- ing units are vacant. Most of the families displaced by the Cathedral Project will most probably be rehoused in existing private housing. Relocation Organization and Procedure The Housing and Redevelopment Authority attempts to mobilize all available community resources to assist in relocating families to be displaced by an urban renewal project. These include public agencies, real estate offices, builders, social agencies and settlement houses and churches serving the area, among others. The Authority is now in the process of selecting a Relocation Advisory Committee of citizen leaders representing these and other community resources. The Committee - 5 - will meet regularly with the staff of the Authority to advise it on problems and procedures. The Authority has an experienced full time Relocation staff (5 professional and 1 clerical position) which will serve the Cathedral Project from an office already established in the area. The staff is headed by a Relocation Officer who reports to the Authority's Director of Community Services. Detailed data on each family and individual in the project area including information on size of family, place of work, income and housing preference, has already been gathered. As each property is acquired the families living in the structures are visited by a representative of the Relocation Office and informed of the relocation service available. Many families have already made their own plans to move. If not they are given listings of available houses for sale or rental units. If eligible for public housing they are given the opportunity to apply and their priority explained to them. Where need be, families are taken to available apartments or houses by Relocation staff members. The Relocation staff also makes and maintains contact with real estate firms, builders and financial institutions keeping listings of available rentals and houses for sale and assisting families with house financing problems. Families are given as much time as possible to find relocation housing with staff assistance. Each family is offered a number of standard houses or apartments before they are asked to move. If any family moves to substandard housing the Relocation staff continues to give it assistance until it can find standard housing. The Authority pays the moving expenses for families and individual house- holders in the project area in accordance with a fixed relocation payment sched- ule adopted by the Authority by resolution on September 4, 1963. Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota ESTIMATED NUMBER OF FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUAL HOUSEHOLDERS TO BE DISPLACED BY URBAN RENEWAL AND PUBLIC HOUSING PROJECT 1963 1964 1965 (Sept -Dec) Cathedral I 56 265 202 Riverview 60 145 Downtown 55 Dunedin Terrace 45 46 Mt. Airy (Addition) 29 Total 101 455 347 Families 82 294 241 Individual Householders 19 161 71 1 ' September 6, 1963 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota METHOD PROPOSED FOR FINANCING CATHEDRAL URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINN. R -25 The Housing and Redevelopment Authority proposes to finance the Cathedral Urban Renewal Project with a combination of Federal and local funds. The cost of the project is estimated at $3,631,851. It is planned to finance this cost as follows: Sale of Project Land $ 429,438 Federal Grant 2,134,942 Local Grant 1,067,471. The local grant will be made up of a cash grant by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of St. Paul from the Redevelopment Tax Levy Fund estimated at $920,857 and non -cash grants -in -aid provided by the State of Minnesota, the City of St. Paul and the St. Paul Board of Education in the total amount of $146,614. These non -cash grants -in -aid are itemized as follows: Credit Total Cost 1. Demolition or removal of streets and utilities in technical- vocational school site by Board of Education $41,679 $41,679 2. Removal of sidewalk and gutters on boundary streets ,(Marshall and Arundel) 939 939 3. Site improvements: Marshall Avenue, Arundel Street improvements and utility installation by City of Saint Paul 70,283 209,588* (continued) Credit Total Cost 4. Park land purchase and improvement by Board of Education $14,668 $86,280* 5. Land donation from State of Minnesota (tax forfeit land) 19,045 - $146,614 $338,486 * Additional credit will be received for these expenditures in Cathedral Area Projects II and III. ZA 1 v ' G -7 10/20/60 CERTIFICATE OF SECRETAIrZ The undersigned hereby certifies, as follows: (1) That he is the duly qualified and acting Secretary of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, " enc Minnesota herein called the "Local Public A � Agency" and the keeper of the records of the Local Public Agency; (2) That the attached RESOLUTION No- 63 -9/4_2 is a true and correct copy of the RESOLUTION N0. 63 -9/4 -2 as executed on the 4th day of September 19 (3) The seal affixed below constitutes the official seal of the Local Public Agency and this Certificate is hereby executed under such Official seal; (4) That the undersigned is duly authorized to execute this Certificate. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 4th day of Sent ember 19 63 ( S E A L ) Secretary grown , O �I b B. WARNER SHIPPEE Executive Director HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Mrs. Agnes O'Connell City Clerk Attn: Mr. Harold Riordan City Hall and Court House Saint Paul, Minnesota OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL September 5, 1963 55 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL 1, MINN. CApital 7 -7523 HAROLD J. MORIARTY Chairman CARL CUMMINS, JR. PATRICK J. TOWLE JOHN W. GREENMAN EUGENE R. LAMBERT Re: Notice of Public Hearing Cathedral Area Renewal Plan Minn. R -25 Dear Mrs. O'Connell: r M.S.A. 462.521 (1) and Title 42 U.S.C.A. 1455 (d) require public hearing on the Redevelopment Plan as a condition to approval of the Plan by City Council and as a condition to acquisition of project land by the Authority. Publication of notice of such hearing in the Dispatch or Pioneer Press is required at least ten days before the date of such hearing. Enclosed find a proposed Notice of Public Hearing which the writer believes satisfies the requirements of the above cited statutes. Enc. !.1 `9 ri filer truly yours, James T. Hart Staff Counsel MIS LF"—N-===MJ ni FROPOSKD RESOLOTION OF CDLVCZLf OF CITY OF . - SAM PAUL 'APPROM TO R$DZOWPHW PLAN • ; AM 7.'flE 88 MILM OF RRWCl 109 FOR PROJECt - ND. MUM. B+-.23 WMpMS; cinder the progiaions. of Title f ,of the, flowing Act of 1949- as . ameadsd, the flossing and HOMO Finance Administrator is authorised'to provide financial asoistabce to Local- Public Agoadias for undertaking and carrying- out 'urban, r6ne"I Projects; - and ' WHREB iB' it is pro#ded in ouch Act, thdt contr #ct for financial aid thsretusder�• shall require -that the Redevelopment•Plan,for the respective project area be approved - _ by the governins body -of the iotgtjty in ahinh the project is situated and -that such approval include- findings bar` the aqverning body that; (1) -the finjaciral aid to be provided in the coutfact is,:necessary tQ enoble the,project.to be t6dertaken -in -accordance srith the Re4evelopwat Pisa; (2) t'he Redevolopment Plan will afford mssxiuuas opportunity,,. t6zieiQtent Mith the a4nc �ageds of the Locality ss a Rhole, for the x• habilitation or redev lopment of the uih4o renevol area by private enterprise; _ (3) the Aedevelopm eon eht Plan forw* to. a general plan for, the develbpsrant of the 1aaality, cut a viols; and (4) the 8edevslopmOt Plan gives dun consideration to the -, provision of adequate park aW Ito reatf�nsl areas and facilities,. as may be d ®Hirable for, .neighborhood improvement, with spediol cbus .de stlon for the health, sr►fety, and ' -,gelfaxe of children reaidi.iig in the general gi.ciAity of the site cowered by the Plan; t_ s NHUMS, the Sousing and AedeveloPwjiA Authority of 'thr City of Saint Paul # Minnesota (herein called the "Local. Public Age#��y ") has entered into a planning c�m itract for fnixwial Asofitance wader such act with the United_ States of Assrica, actipg by a*nd through t,be .Sousing fto florae! rinaWei Administrator, pursuant to thich, 61 $edaral fund's tr+exe rcri*:# ded for the urban,- i_re�eifra , � ro jsct (heroin called the "Project ") I _ WHEREAS there has been prepared and referred to the Council, of the Locality (herein called the "Governing Body"} for review and approval a Redevelop -- ,.v meat Plata for the.Project'area, dated August, 19630 a0d consisting of 12 pages and four (4).maps supported by the following supplementary material, data, and aecotmretxlatlons, ,which m*terial, data,-and recommendations are not a part. of said Urban Renewal Plan; 1. Final Project Report, Cathedral AreetUrban Renewal Project Minn, R -25 2. Statement of Method For Financing Cathedral Area Urban BeneWal ` Project Minh.' R -25 3. Relocation Program; and WHEREAS a stato of the method- proposed for financing of the Project has been submitted to the Governing Body, iith and, �� yring the - Redevelopment Plan, for the. Project area; and WHEREAS said. $edepe,lopment' Plan hag '� p �tt�rf -ad by the Governing Body of the Local Public Agemy, e.s evidenced by.resoltut-iou of the Local Public Agency dated September 4, 1963 of -acid tody'a duly,-certified resolution approving said gedetvelopment-Plan, Whicli is attached hereto; and =' = WHSRBAS the'Plai#ning Board of the City of Saint Paul, which is the duly designated acting official planning body, for the, Locality, hait prepared and adapted :a - Cmprehensive Plan by, resolution dated April 19; 1963, which Plan implements the Pzelin+inary Guide Plaxi adapted April, 11, 1958, . and is recognized and used as a guide ! for,the general development of the Locality as a whole; and WHEREAS, the.-said Planning. Board has considered and examined the Redevelop- ment Plan for the Project area and bait submitted to`tha Governing Body its written �S, y . opinion, by resolution adopted September 3, 1963, -that the objectives and purposes of the Redevelopment Plan conform to the.objeetives and proposals of the Comprehensive Plan for -the Locality, and -the Governing Body has -duly considered avid vritteu .opinion of-the Planning Board; and QHERSA$ _ said• Redevelopment, Plan for the Project area prescribes certain' land uses for the Project area and will require,, among other things, changes in � zoning,.the vacating and removal of streets, alleys; and other public ways, the _ establishment of tew street patterns, -the location And relocation of sewer and Rater ma-fts and other public facIltties,, and -other public action;- and WHEREAS the Local Public Agency has prepared _and - submit ted a program for the relocation ,of families that may -be displaced as a result of - curving out the i- Project in accordance with said Redevelopment, Plan; and ; WHEREAS there have also been presented to the Governing Body information and data respecting the relocation program which has been prepared by the Local - Public Agency as a result , -of studios,;._ surveys, and inspections in the Project area and .the assembling and- analyses. of the data and information obtained from such studies;-surveys, and inspections; .and WHEREAS the members. of the Governing. Body have general knowledge of the conditions prevailing in the Project area and of the availability of. proper housing in the Locality for the relocation -of families that may be displaced from the 'Project area and, in the light _of such kugwledgd of vocal housing condi-tion6, have 'carefully considered and revieved such proposals for relocation; and, WHEREAS it is necessary that' the Governing Body take appropriate - official action respecting the relocation program and said Redevelopment Plan for'the Project, in conformity with the contracts for financial assistance between. -the Local Public _ Agency and the United States of America, acting by and through the Sousing and.Bome, Vinance Administrator; and WHEREAS the Governing Body is cognisant of'the - conditions that,are imposed in the undertaking and carrying odt of urban renewal project$ with Federal financial assistance under Title , including those prohibiting discrimination because of - race, color; creed, or lastiotnal origins i TH_ERLFORR, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL.OF THE CITY OF SAID PAUL; r + 1 4 1: That it is hereby found and determined that the Project is a blighted z area and qualifies as an eligible Project urea under. Minnesota Municipal Sousing and Redevelopment Act. 2, That said Redevelopment Plain for the Project aforementioned, having' been duly reviewed and .considered, .is hereby approved, and the City C1e>sk be and is hereby directed to fil& said copy -of said Redevelopment Plat} with the minutes of this meeting. ` 3. That it is hereby found and determined that said Redevelopment Plan for the Project area conforms to- said Comprehensive Plan for the Locality. ` 4. That it is hereby found and determined that the financial aid provided and to be provided pursuant to said contracts for Federal financial assistance pertaining to the Proleet is necessary to enable the Project to_be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan for_ the Pro ject: area. 5. That it is hereby found and determined -that the above - mentioned Redevelopment Plan for the Urban Renewal Area will afford ;maximtnm opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the Locality as a hole, for the urban renewal .of such areas by private enterprise. b.That it is hereby sound and determined that the Redevelopment Plan for the Urban Renewal Ared gives due tcnsideration to the provision of adequate park _ and recreational areas and faoilities, as may be desirable for neighborhood i4rovement, with special .consideration for the health safety, and Welfare of children residing i4 the general vicinity of the site covered-by the Plan. 70 That -lt`is hereby-found ind determined that the program for-the proper • relocation of,the,f - ' amilies displaced ia. carrying out -'the Project in decent, aalfe, and` oanita• ". dwelli -~ - ry ag$ 3n conformity with acceptabl,c standards is_feasible and can - be.feasonably and tjkely effected -to permit the prpper.,prosecution and .completion' o the_Rrojeot; _ and -that such **Higgs or dvelling .units available or to be made availible'to stick: displaced faoilied." are_�at least equal in nwaber to the a�iiez--of diaplsec d families, are not geaeral.ly "lean: desirable in regard to pub. lie utilities '- and publiCL and commercial facilities thaw, the dwellings of the displaced families - in the Project "area; are available at meats or prices within the -financial -means ; of the displaced: families, airid era Feaaoti_ably" accessible to' their places of _ - S. That in order to implement and facilitate the offectuation of the Redevelopment Plan hereby approved it-to 'found - -and determined that certain official } action xa!sst be taken by :this Body with reference,. among other things, to (changto, . in- zoning, the vacating; .and removal. -of streets, - alleys, .mud` other 'p+ublic' ways; the -establishment of new. stareet patterns,'t he. ,location and relocation of sever and pater _ mains and.other public facilities, and others public, and, accordingly, this _ , Body bereby (a) pledghs. its . cooper ation in Uelping to carry out such Redevelopmennt Plan; (b) regnests the -various offici * s, _departments, boards, apd agencies of_ _ the Locality having admi�nfitrativ- reapb4sibilities. in _the- premises likewise to codperate to ,such end • asid •to "exercise their _respective functions and_ pourers. in -a manner consistent with said Redevelo iiaxtt Plan; and '(c) ,_ stands(-ready to consider _ • 'and take appropriate action upon_ proposals and measures designated 'to, effectuate ° said xedevslopmenf•- Plan. - , - • Tz 9.: That additional financial arss stanee under the -provisions of Tittle Y - " of -the. •Housi�ag Act of 1949' as `a�spniied, is necessary to enablaa the land in t_he . P.roject _ , Oea. to .bey renewed in atoozditee with the Redfivelopment Ply for the Project area and, ..accordingly, the filins by the Local Public Agejicy of a�a applicetaion or applications r for such financial astaistance under said Title I is. hereby approved. i ' CITY PLANNING BOARD OF SAINT PAUL 1315 Courthouse RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL9 MINNESOTA approving. Redevelopment Plan for Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project, Minn. R -25, dated August, 1963° WHEREAS Minnesota Statutes 1953„ State Edition, Section462.515 and 4624521 provide that the planning agency of the municipality in which a redevelopment pro- ject is proposed to be undertaken shall provide a written opinion concerning such project NOW* THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Planning Board df the City of Saint Paul, that having considered the proposal," "Redevelopment Plan for Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project Minna R -259" dated August, 1963,.which.proposal con- sists of: A, Table of Contents B. Description of Project to Boundary Map 2, Boundary Description 3, Types of Proposed Renewal Actions C. Land Use Plan to Proposed Land Use 2. Land Use Provisions and Building Requirements Do Project Proposals 1. Land Acquisition 2. Redeveloper's Obligations E. Other Provisions Necessary to Meet State and Local Requirements 1. Non - Discrimination 2, Other Actions Necessary F. Procedure for Changes in Approved Plan Map Exhibits to Plan Flap No o 1 Boundary flap Map Noe 2 Proposed Land Use Map Noe 3 Proposed Rights -of -Way Map No, 4 Acquisition Map The City Planning Board now advises the Saint Paul City Council, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, and all others that it is the opinion of the City Planning Board of Saint Paul, Minnesota# that the objectives and purposes of said Redevelopment Plan conform to the Comprehensive Plan objectives and proposals of the City of Saint Paul and the adoption of this resolution signifies ap- proval of this proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Cathedral Area,Urban Renewal Projects Minn, R -25, Adopted by the City Planning Board of Saint Paul on Tuesday, September 3, 19639 by a vote of 9 ayes and 0 nayes, A quorum was present Certified to be a true+,, �and ncggrect copy: Directo of City Planning Custod an of Planning Board Minute Books THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF THE CITY OF ST. PAUL INTER - OFFICE COMMUNICATION September 5, 1963 Commissioner Milton Rosen Department of Public Works City of Saint Paul Dear Commissioner Rosen: It is my understanding that the Housing & Redevelopment Authority will present to the Council for approval today, September 5th, the prelim- inary plan for the Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project. This is the area where the new vocational school will be built. The Department of Public Works is rather heavily involved in the necessary physical changes incident to this project and for that reason would like to brief you by means of this report. Acceptance of the plan involves a number of commitments by the City of St. Paul among which are the financing and carrying out without assess- ment against land within the project boundaries of the following: 1. Vacation acceptance and modification of certain streets in the area and the purchase of a 14 foot strip of right -of -way on the north side of Marshall Avenue from Cathedral Place.to Western. 2. Constructing a widened roadway on Marshall Avenue from Cathedral Place to Western Avenue, including new street lighting. 3. Resurfacing of Arundel Street from Carroll to Marshall. 4. Construction of fairly extensive storm and sanitary works. 5. Acceptance and approval of certain rezonings that will be necessary to accomplish the plan. Certain of the physical works will be performed at the exclusive expense of the Authority and certain of them at the expense of the Depart- ment of Education. However, it is estimated that the expense for projects, that would be exclusively the responsibility of the City and this really means the Department of Public Works, inasmuch as the work involves that All I& q Commissioner Rosen - Page 2 - Sept. 5, 1963 relating to streets and sewers primarily, would amount to approximately $211,401.00. This is a very preliminary estimate prepared by the Housing Authority and would be subject to considerable revision upon more detailed plans and estimating. These are funds which must be found and actually expended on these improvements. Financing has been worked out to a fairly substantial degree. You will recall that the 1953 Bond Issue provided for an i'mprovement on Rondo Avenue. The Housing Authority claimed a non -cash grant -in -aid for this contemplated improvement. With the advent of the freeway program, the State and the Bureau of Public Roads agreed to take on the Rondo project as a frontage road, thus making it unnecessary for the City to construct this particular improvement. However, withdrawal of these funds from the Rondo project was somewhat of a problem inasmuch as the St. Paul Housing Redevelopment Authority had already claimed a non -cash grant- in-aid. Con- sequently, a three -way agreement was negotiated between the Highway Depart- ment, the City of St. Paul and the St. Paul Housing & Redevelopment Authority whereby these city funds were withdrawn from this proposed project and placed in a special unallocated reserve fund with the understanding that they would be used for physical improvements in and around one or another of the urban renewal projects. It was contemplated at the time that this fund would be used for the necessary physical improvements in the Cathedral Area which is close by to the Rondo Ave. project. Pursuant to a recommendation of this Department and the Council Bond Advisory Committee, the City Council on October 31, 1962, under Resolution C. F. 209773, transferred funds from the Rondo project 200 ST -5 to a special unallocated reserve for the aforementioned purpose. The amount available is approximately $170,000.00. Comparing this to the current estimate for city expenditures of $211,000.00 it may be seen that the financing for the proposed Cathedral Area improvements is substantially available, but that some $40,000.00 "of additional funds will be required. Inasmuch as this work will extend over perhaps two or three years, it is my belief that these additional funds can be assigned from one or another of the other aid funds or from the budget fund, City Share of Local Improvements. The exact plans and estimates remain to be worked out, but it appears that the general plan of physical improvements is satisfactory in the preliminary plan and that the financing is within the realm of possibility. It is, therefore, my recommendation that if this matter comes before the Council today, that it be approved insofar as the Department of Public Works is concerned with the understanding that the present plans are preliminary and will be subject to refinement. EVA /j v Yours very truly, Eugene V. Avery Chief Engineer Council•File No. 214859 —By George J. Vavoulis, Mayor — Resolved, By the Council of the City of Saint Paul, upon public hearing ,pursuant to said Council's prior Res- . olution, C. F. No. 214615, approved September 10, 1963, and upon due consideration of the application of Housing and Redevelopment Authority ,of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, for said Council's approval of said Authority's Redevelopment Plan for Cathedral Area Renewal Project Minn. R -25, dated August, 1963, (designated under said Resolution as "Redevelop- ment Plan for Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project, Minn. R -25, dated August, 1963 "), and for said Council's approval of said project: Whereas, Under the provisions of Title , I of the Housing Act of 1949, c as amended, the Housing and Home Finance Administrator is authorized to provide financial assistance to Local Public Agencies for undertaking and carrying out urban renewal projects; and Whereas, I6. provided in such Act that contractjfbr financial aid thereun- der shall require that the Redevelop- ment Plan for the respective project area be approved by the governing body of the locality in which the project is situated and that such ap- proval include findings by the govern- ing body that: (1) the financial aid to be provided in the contract is neces- sary to enable l t h e project to be undertaken• in `accordance with the Redevelopment •Pion; (2) the Redevel- opment Plan twill afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the Locality as a whole, for the rehabilitation or redevelopment of the urban renewal area by private enterprise; (3) the Redevelopment Plan conforms to a general plan for the development of the locality as a whole; land (4) the Redevelopment Plan gives due ;consideration to the provision of adequate park and recreational areas drid facilities, as may be desirable for neighborhood improvement, with special consideration for the health, safety, and welfare of children residing iii the general vicinity of the site covered by the Plait; and Whereas, The Housing and Redevel- opment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, + Minnesota (}herein, called the "Loo Piibhc Agency ") has - entered into a planning contract for financial assistance under such act with t h e United 'States of America, acting by sand , through the Housing and Home .Finance Administrator, pursuant to' "which Federal funds were provided for the urban renewal project (herein called the "Project ") identified' as' "Cathedral Area Renewal Plan Project,' No. Minn. R -25" and encompassing the area bounded by Beginning at the point of intersec- tion of the southern right -of -way line of Carroll Avenue with the Western right -of -way line of Ca- thedral Place, then southerly along said line of Cathedral Place to the point of intersection with t We' southern right -of -way line of Mar- shall Avenue, then westerly along said line to the point bf intersection with the eastern right -of -way line of Arundel Street, then northerly along said line to the point of intersection with the northern right -of -way line of Marshall Ave- nue, then westerly along said line to the point of intersection with the western right -of -way line of Arundel Street, then northerly Along said line to the point of in- tersection with the southern right - of-way line of the alley between Rondo and Carroll Avenues, then easterly along said alley line 263.375 feet to the point of intersection with a lot line, then southerly Along said lot line to the point of intersection with the southern right -of -way line of Carroll Ave- nue, then easterly along said line to the point of intersection with the western right -of -way line of Ca- thedral Place which is the point of beginning in the City of Sa t Paul, State of Minnesota, (herein; called the "Lo- cality"); and Whereas, The Local Public Agency has applied for additional financial as- sistance under such. Act and proposes to enter Into an additional 'egntract or contracts;•with the Housing�afid Home Finance 'Agency_: for the undertaking of, and for making:,available additional financial assistance for, the Project; and Whereas, The Local Public Agency has made detailed studies of the loca- tion, physical condition of structures, land, use, environmental influences, and social, cultural, and economic condi- tions of the Project area and has de- termined that the area is a blighted area and that it is detrimental and a menace to the safety, health, and wel- fare of the inhabitants and users there- of and of the Locality at large, because of dilapidation, obsolescence, faulty arrangement and design, deleterious eland use and obsolete layout and the members of this Governing Body have been fully apprised by the Local Public Agency and are aware of these facts and conditions; and Whereas, There has been prepared and referred to the Council of the' Locality (herein called the "Govern ' ing Body ") for review and approval a Redevelopment Plan for the Project area, dated August, 1963, and consisting of '12 pages and four (4) maps sup- ported by the following supplementary material, data, and recommendations, which material, data, and recommenda- tions are not a part of said Urban Renewal Plan: 1. Final Project Report, Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project Minn. R -25 2. Statement of Me_ thod For Financ- ing Cathedral Area Urban Re- newal Project Minn. R -25 3. Relocation Program; and Whereas, A statement of the method proposed for financing of the Project has been submitted to the Governing Body, with and accompanying the Re- development Plan for the Project area; and Whereas, Said Redevelopment Plan has been approved by the Governing Body of the Local Public Agency, as evidenced by resolution of the Local Public Agency dated September 4, 1963 of said Body's duly certified reso- lution approving said Redevelopment Plan, which is attached hereto; and Whereas, The Planning Board of the City of Saint Paul, which is the duly designated acting official planning body for the Locality, has prepared and adapted a Comprehensive Plan by reso- lution dated April 19, 1963, which Plan implements the Preliminary Guide Plan adapted April 11, 1958, and is recognized and used as a guide for the general development of the Locality as a whole; and Whereas, The said Planning Board has considered and examined the Re- development Plan for the Project area and has submitted to the Governing Body its written opinion, by resolution adopted September 3, 1963, that the objectives and purposes of the Rede- velopment Plan conform to the objec- tives and proposals of the Compre- hensive Plan for the Locality, and the Governing Body has duly considered said written opinion of the Planning Board; and Whereas, Said Redevelopment Plan for the Project area prescribes certain land uses for the Project area and will require, among other things, changes in zoning, the vacating and removal of streets, alleys, and other public ways, the establishment of new street Pat-' terns, the location and relocation of ewer and water mains and other pub- lic facilities, and other public action; and Whereas, The Local Public Agency, has prepared and submitted a program for the relocation of families that may be displaced as a result of carrying out the Project in accordance witTi said Redevelopment Plan; and Whereas, There have also been pre- f sented to the Governing Body informa- tion and data respecting the relocation program which has been prepared by the Local Public Agency as a result of studies, surveys, and inspections in the Pro ect area and the assembling and analyses of the data and information obtained from such studies, surveys, and inspections; and Whereas, The members of the Gov - erning Body have general knowledge of the conditions prevailing in the Project area and of the availability of proper housing in the Locality for the relocation of families that may be displaced from the-Project area and,: in the light of such knowledge of'locaV housing conditions, have carefully con- sidered and reviewed' such proposals) Whereas, It Is necessary that the Governing Body take appropriate offi- cial action respecting the relocation program and said Redevelopment Plan for the Project, in conformity with the contracts for financial assistance be- tween the Local Public Agency and the United States of America, acting by and through the Housing and Home Finance Administrator; and Whereas, The Governing Body is cognizant of the conditions that are imposed in the undertaking and car- rying out of Urban renewal projects with Federal financial assistance under Title I, including those prohibiting dis- crimination because of race, color, creed, or national origin: that said Council, having heard all parties concerned and considered all evidence presented germane to said application, and being fully advised in the premises, does hereby make the following findings of fact and grant the following approvals sought by said ap- plication: 1. That it is hereby found and de- termined that the project is a blighted area and qualifies as an eligible Project area under Minnesota Municipal Hous- ing and Redevelopment Act. 2. That said Redevelopment Plan for the Project aforementioned, having been duly reviewed and considered, is hereby approved, and the City Clerk be and is hereby directed to file said copy of said Redevelopment Plan with the minutes of this meeting. 3. That it is hereby found a n d determined that said Redevelopment Plan for the Project area conforms to said Comprehensive Plan for the lo- cality 4. That it is hereby found and determined that the financial aid pro- vided and to be provided pursuant to said contracts for Federal financial assistance pertaining to the Project is necessary to enable the Project to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan for the Project area. 5. That it is hereby found and determined that the above mentioned Redevelopment Plan for the Urban Renewal Area will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the Locality as a whole, for the urban renewal of such areas by private enterprise That it is hereby found and determined that the Redevelopment Plan for the Urban Renewal Area gives due consideration to the provision of adequate park and recreational areas and facilities, as m a y be desirable for neighborhood improvement, with special consideration for the health, safety, and welfare of children resid- ing in the general vicinity of the site covered by the Plan. 7. That it is hereby found and de- termined that the program for the proper relocation of the' families dis- placed in carrying out the Project in ,decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings in conformity with acceptable standards' is feasible and can be reasonably and timely effected to permit the proper prosecution and completion of the Pro- ject; and that such dwellings or dv. e';ing units available or to be made l av :..!..•)le to such displaced rc lamiliesl a at least cqu.l , it, numoer to the nu ;t..iar of disph. :,a,: families, are not, 4e :..r; lip less c., e :able in regard to? ^l :,Ac ..tilities .xci public and commer- C.%, RwEities tlit,.i the dwellings of the displaced 1z i lies in the Project •.rea, at,- availab:e at rents or prices w.tl in t'1e finane,al means of the dis- placed families, and are reasonably accessible to their places of employ - ML11t. 8. That in orcior to implement and facilitate the aTcctuation of the Re- f development P;an hereby approved it is found and determined that certain E official notion must be taken by t h i s k Body with reference, among other things, to (changes in zoning, the vacc.un • and removal of streets, alloys, and ')that- public ways, the establish. t en. of new street patterns, the lo- cation and relocation of server and water inains and other public facilities, and other public action), and, accord- ingly, this Body her..ov (a) pledges its cooperation in he .. s.; to carry out Such Redevelopme:.:.Ilan; (b) requests the various officials, departments, boards, and agencies of the Locality having administrative responsibilities j in the premises likewise to cooperate tt to such end and to exercise their re- spective functions and powers in a manner consistent with said Redevel- opment Plan; and (c) stands ready to consider and take appropriate action upon proposals and measures desig- nated to effectuate said Redevelopment Plan. 9. That additional financial assistance under the provisions of Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, is necessary to enable the land in the Project area to be renewed in accord - �icc with Redevelopment Plan fnr +tip QUADRUPLICATE TO DEPARTMENT 214615 CITY OF ST. PAUL FOENCIL NO. _ } OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK P COUNCIL RESOLUTION — GENERAL FORM PRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER DATE RL80LyJBD$ by. the Council of the City of Saint Paul, , that Hour irAS and Redevelopment Authority of tha City Of Saint Paul! HlUnoodta # having deteroinod that the thereby roposod Radevelopoent PrOJect chould be undertaken# on the 8th day of September, 19$3,1, riled with the Cit Cleric of the City of Saint Paul and pr©sented to this Counoll with it* applioatign for said C*unollfs approval of the samov its Redevelopment Plan for that certain area within tho City or Saint Paul, County Of namsoy and Sttta of Hinnevota, com - 004ly 465194at0d ea Cathedral Areas "Beginning at the paint or tutoreaction of the southern right-of-Way 13he of Carroll Avenue with the Woster" right -of -wa 'line of Cathedral Place, tho-4 southerly along said lane *f Cathedral Place to the poi`at of Intersootion vtth the southern. right-of.-way line of Ra�PShall Avaxkue# then west - erg along said line to the paint of Interseation wi the eaotarn right- of-way line of Arundel. Street# then northerly along said line to the point of intor- saotion with the northern right. -of-gray line or Marshall Avenue, then westerly along said line to the point of intorasction with the western right-of.-may line of Arundel Street, then northerly along oaaid line to the point of intersection with the southern right-of-way line off' the alley betvieen Hondo end Carroll Avonues, thou ensterly along said alley line 263,373 feet to tha point of intersection with Ia lot line, then south.. Orly along said lot line to the point of intersection With the southern right -of -sway line of Carroll Avenuo, then easterly along said line to the point of inter seotion with the western right-of-way lute of Cathedral. Place which to the point of 'begtnning." W id Re4eveloament Plan being designated "R.+edavalopment Plan for Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project, Minn. R..23# dated Auguot, 1963 "; togothor with a stntaaent of tho mothod 1 COUNCILMEN Adopted by the Council 19— Yeas Nays i �gi sb Holland Approved 19— Loss In Favor i Mortinson Peterson Mayor Against Rosen Mr. President, Vavoulis 101,1 8-62 ,y�r -4 12-14 61 1-- 2 '", MMP,Oped for the and the written opinion, Of'guOh Rodoroio by the Planning Board Or thereon A'ndap Mott Project Pertinent data ga1d,Cty -of proval cif same said Redevelopment Saint Paul and other and Other dote �-IAA and P, ohsrte said City Clerk"' Of""' 90MO bolug on file the Office of and In "VOlOPMOnt. AUthority-othe Office Of Baid, Hquoing and subject tQ Inopection d f the City Of Saint Paul; 11junegota ,%amt;s bY oxen U-"lng regular 'bualness hours, the p oo,, h and parcel her., oreby are I W with ... UcOrPOrsted herein and Made 0"Pot as if said same int Ott# PurPOSO and Set forth d0"064tS 40d all of the same W herein t, tha. -t- pursuant ore. fUlly statutes 'Ann6tfit -nt to �e . Pd1,'-,tjj18, OtiOn 462.1�210 Hinnegota Vidog that It 6,1141-1ho-', COUU011 hereby det0rMI400 and pro. Redievelopmo,4t P--- Id a public hearing on said proposed lat Otd. said. proposed RedevQ for Said ClAtheOr4l Aro - - - as lOpment Projedt develoPM6 Presented by said HOUSing and Re. nt Authority Of thb c of Saint Paulfune.,a# aforessl4And that,-said publ I hold before thi �hjjpot 'a HoUae -at, the -,6 8� C91M011 in'th'5 C-ounell-ilqli- hall, bo 0 faint Pauli In the court f SOPtembert 'A't.100- of, te 0 - On the 24th, da hoarj't-ig' ► - -cloak that- y a nd'ftfinijive of the P t'UPO'a said public shall consider r-gaid lRedevelopm urpose Of the saMo tbig Coutdil and said #nt - Plan_ Rtdovelopment project ,t6r aid 'Cathedral Area; other thi,494,-# -detep theieby-PrOP68ed and iamong 'Mine.whether or n6t-thji Counci-1.0 He t1on thereat to be Considered steal Bolu. said HeddVel.6p.matt;Rlan and 11 bp ado Od approving permitting,, said Housing Mild R-edevelo City of, -Saint J? 1,1nuand Rodeve, Pmeut PrOject'aAd projeo esota, ,,to lophlett" A-Ut'horlty of the t Under Sta -* I und"'take a 'Urban, renewal te and local law With Fede n asslotancO Under Title ,l O:t-. the - ral Finenciall amended � to -- � a HbuSlng'�Act- Of 1949 as or remove - &OqulrO land In- the pro ' 0 "t � ; � to, demolish or recf:inztbU'ld'P9s:aUd -ImOrOV'emeirtj -ar6a Mct O�reets,, utilities 8' to"nstAils 00notruat ProjeOt intprovezOhtS, and to make -11"anpEkrkso PlaMidunds and other d.aVailabl,o for developa. dent or redev,010M.... by- prqvilte 'nonprofit ontejpr1s4:, agencies Or publie oj� ag alltlaOrized b3'r ]a , and, among other thingol, it Connootion 1110 with said Resolut. at Bald meeting this'CO to b0-00nuiddred aCcorditgl UnOil Will deteral - or aid to be V upon the aluestions Whether Ine And make findings Provided in :the co not (1) the finanolal attilat 1A n0aes, - PrOJOct tQ be utdertaken- in a Vary to enable th Plan (2) the Redevelop ocordatce with the Redevelopment tual I Meht Plan will W alit rat t Cf0ouralstont -vith, 'tho Off6rd moximum a Who 0OUnd nee oppor- the rehibilitation di Of the loc�litv a#,, . renewal aroa,,br privot, Or redevkopiaont of the urban pla Oftbrpri - i - ( ) th , 4 conf Arms to 'a -gener'41, p lat., ;1rao Oomelol�ment 1 0 _ el opment locallti as - ri Ro ,o a Wholel S'dd (4) the Rede-rel-ent r the QOnOideratjog to the provio 'o , I - , i6l, 1 Plan gives due ar-OaS *nd.fa'0'tlit1e., .. May be . Adequat —0 Park and orhoodt1%. provemento with ape- 001"'0r, neighb and Welfare Or 6MIA01al Oonsiderati' ",q. On f or tom, vu-601,& "i safozy, -1�40 site 00vared by tt z"slat'49 in the general Vicinity of 0 Plan t Commissioner Rosen - Page 2 - Sept. 5, 1963 relating to streets and sewers primarily, would amount to approximately $211,401.00. This is a very preliminary estimate prepared by the Housing Authority and would be subject to considerable revision upon more detailed plans and estimating. These are funds which must be found and actually expended on these improvements. Financing has been worked out to a fairly substantial degree. You will recall that the 1953 Bond issue provided for an,improvement on Rondo Avenue. The Housing Authority claimed a non -cash grant -in -aid for this contemplated improvement. With the advent of the freeway progress, the State and the Bureau of Public Roads agreed to take on the Rondo project as a frontage road, thus making it unnecessary for the City to construct this particular improvement. However, withdrawal of these funds from the Rondo project was somewhat of a problem Inasmuch as the St. Paul Housing E Redevelopment Authority had already claimed a non -cash grant -in -aid. Con- sequently, a three -way agreement was negotiated between the Highway Depart- ment, the City of St. Paul and the St. Paul Housing S Redevelopment Authority whereby these city funds were Withdrawn from this proposed project and placed in a special unallocated reserve fund with the understanding that they would be used for physical improvements in and around one or another of the urban renewal projects. It was contemplated at the time that this fund would be used for the necessary physical improvements In the Cathedral Area which Is close by to the Rondo Ave. project. Pursuant to a recommendation of this Department and the Council Bond Advisory Committee, the City Council on October 31, 1962, under Resolution C. F. 209773, transferred funds from the Rondo project 300 ST -5 to a special unallocated reserve for the aforecaentioned purpose. The amount available is approximately $170,000.00. Comparing this to the current estimate for city expenditures of $211,000.00 It may be seen that the financing for the proposed Cathedral Area improvements is substantially available, but that some $40,000.00 of additional funds will be required. Inasmuch as this work will extend over perhaps two or three years, It is my belief that these additional funds can.be assigned from one or another of the other aid funds or from the budget fund, City Share of Local Improvements. The exact plans and estimates remain to be worked out, but it appears that the general plan of physical improvements is satisfactory in the preliminary plan and that the financing is within the realm of possibility. It is, therefore, my recommendation that if this matter comes before the Council today, that it be approved insofar as the Department of Public Works is concerned with the understanding that the present plans are preliminary and will be subject to refinement. Yours very truly, Eugene V. Avery Chief Engineer EVA/ j v September, 1963 Housing and Redevelopment Lut ority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota RELOCATION PROGBM FOR THE CATHEDRAL AREA UREA.11 RENEWAL PROJECT The Housing and Redevelopment Authority is charged with the responsibility for determining in advance of engaging in an urban renewal project that housing resources are or will be available to meet the needs of families to be displaced by the project. After property has been acquired the Authority is further respon- sible for assisting families and individuals find suitable standard housing within their means. This report summarizes information concerning the families and in- dividuals within Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project based on a 100% survey con- ducted by the Authority. It also contains estimates of the resources available to meet the need and briefly describes the organization and procedure established to assist displaced families and individuals. These data are based on the Reloca- tion Report which constitutes part of the Final Project Report approved by Resolu- tion No. 63 -5/8 -5 of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, which has been submitted to the Council of the City of Saint Paul. The Relocation Report demonstrates that there are available or will be pro- vided in the project or in other areas not less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of families displaced from the project area, decent, safe and sanitary dwellingsequal in number to such displaced families. Number of Families and Individuals to be Displaced The Cathedral Urban Renewal Project I will displace 328 families with two or more members, 176 individuals living in separate dwelling units and 16 roomers. These families and individuals are divided between white and non -white as follows: September, 1963 Housing and Redevelopment Luthority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota RELOCATION PROGM4 FOR THE CATHEDRAL AREA MEM FENEWAL PROJECT The Housing and Redevelopment Authority is charged with the responsibility for determining in advance of engaging in an urban renewal project that housing resources are or will be available to meet the needs of families to be displaced by the project. After property has been acquired the Authority is further respon- sible for assisting families and individuals find suitable standard housing within their means. This report summarizes information concerning the families and in- dividuals within Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project based on a 100% survey con- ducted by the Authority. It also contains estimates of the resources available to meet the need and briefly describes the organization and procedure established to assist displaced families and individuals. These data are based on the Reloca- tion Report which constitutes part of the Final Project Report approved by Resolu- tion No. 63 -5/8 -5 of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, which has been submitted to the Council of the City of Saint Paul. The Relocation Report demonstrates that there are available or will be pro- vided in the project or in other areas not less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of families displaced from the project area, decent, safe and sanitary dwellingsequal in number to such displaced families. Number of Families and Individuals to be Displaced The Cathedral Urban Renewal Project I will displace 328 families with two or more members, 176 individuals living in separate dwelling units and 16 roomers. These families and individuals are divided between white and non -white as follows: - 2 - Total 17bite NontiWhite Families 320 256 72 Individual Householders 176 147 29 Roomers 16 14 2 One hundred eight of the families own their own homes and 220 rent. Thirty- six individual householders are owners while 140 are renters. Most of the families and individuals are of middle or low income. One hundred ninety -sips qualify for low -rent public housing operated by the Authority. The following table classifies families' estimated annual income: White Non -White Under $4000 109 44 $4000 to $5999 64 11 $6000 and over 33 5 Not Reported 50 12 Of the 327 families of one or more persons 143 are couples, 86 are families of 3 or 4 persons, 53 are families of 5 or 6 persons while 41 are families of 7 or more persons, Housing Resources The Authority's schedule calls for the beginning of land acquisition and relocation in November, 1963 and their completion by the end of 1965 although the period can be extended if all families have not been satisfactorily relocated by that date. The attached Table shows the estimated number of families and individuals to be displaced by this project and other renewal and public housing projects i - 3 - between now and the end of 1965. These figures are subject to change and probably are high as some may have moved out before the land is acquired. A maximum of 455 families and individuals will need to be relocated in 1964 and 347 in 1965. To meet this need the community has the following resources: A. Turnover in existing public housing apartments B. New public housing to become available C. Existing private housing D. New private housing. Public Housing The Housing and Redevelopment Authority now owns and operates 1544 apartments in the following locations: Number McDonough Homes 562 Roosevelt Homes 320 Mt. Airy 446 Valley Apartments 200 [lest Side Duplexes 16 During the past year 350 apartments have become available through turnover. By 1965 turnover will probably increase to 450 with the availability of 578 addi- tional units. As families displaced by urban renewal and other government action have first priority for these apartments, Cathedral Project families will have the additional resource of the following new apartments which will become available during 1964 and 1965: Neill Apartments Centrhl Apartments Dunedin Terrace (West Side) New Private Housing - 4 - When Available Elderly Family January, 1964 139 16 January, 1964 144 42 1965 127 108 Real Estate Research Corporation has estimated that 1050 new apartments and houses will be privately built in St. Paul annually on an average between 1960 and 1968. Among these will be 140 rental units in Cathedral Project I built at moderate rentals with FHA mortgage assistance under FHA Title 221 D 3 and a number of apartments for the elderly sponsored by churches and other non- profit organizations. Existing Private Housing Based on Federal Census data it is estimated that over 15,000 families move each year in St. Paul. Of these about 12,000 move to apartments or houses they rent while over 3,000 buy houses. At any one time between 2,500 and 3,000 hous- ing units are vacant. Most of the families displaced by the Cathedral Project will most probably be rehoused in existing private housing. Relocation Organization and Procedure The Housing and Redevelopment Authority attempts to mobilize all available community resources to assist in relocating families to be displaced by an urban renewal project. These include public agencies, real estate offices, builders, social agencies and settlement houses and churches serving the area, among others. The Authority is now in the process of selecting a Relocation Advisory Committee of citizen leaders representing these and other community resources, The Committee - 5 - will meet regularly with the staff of the Authority to advise it on problems and procedures. The Authority has an experienced full time Relocation staff (5 professional and 1 clerical position) which will serve the Cathedral Project from an office already established in the area. The staff is headed by a Relocation Officer who reports to the Authority's Director of Community Services. Detailed data on each family and individual in the project area including 4 information on size of family, place of work, income and housing preference, has already been gathered. As each property is acquired the families living in the structures are visited by a representative of the Relocation Office and informed of the relocation service available. Many families have already made their own plans to move. If not they are given listings of available houses for sale or rental units. If eligible for public housing they are given the opportunity to apply and their priority explained to them. Where need be, families are taken to available apartments or houses by Relocation staff members. The Relocation staff also makes and maintains contact with real estate firms, builders and financial institutions keeping listings of available rentals and houses for sale and assisting families with house financing problems. Families are given as much time as possible to find relocation housing with staff assistance. Each family is offered a number of standard houses or apartments before they are asked to move. If any family moves to substandard housing the Relocation staff continues to give it assistance until it can find standard housing. The Authority pays the moving expenses for families and individual house- holders in the project area in accordance with a fixed relocation payment sched- ule adopted by the Authority by resolution on September 4, 1963. Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota ESTIMATED NUMBER OF FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUAL HOUSEHOLDERS TO BE DISPLACED BY URBAN RENEWAL AND PUBLIC HOUSING SEPTEMBER 1963 THROUGH DECEMBER 1965 PROJECT 1963 1964 1965 (Sept -Dec) Cathedral I 56 265 202 Riverview 60 145 Downtown 55 Dunedin Terrace 45 46 Mt. Airy (Addition) 29 Total 101 455 347 Families 82 294 241 Individual Householders 19 161 71 A " , "I.•- I `4�_, .,.� " n'' --4' � . _' � - I., i t" ,f . , 4 497 WE. • AL Y, lmki s .r,74 4 0 Av 1. 4d 11- --T- .4. I "I S. y' 4 jelt 11 P , 41tl t% 2L t :oc 7 "4 4- "k % 4; Ail 3L ZI, I 24 A A W e AW :;b jkj 41 jqo '44 J -NO u P4 I N,'ti. 4 "F.' i.11 71 fZ JIi .1;1 IV-, S go oo 000 N o"A Opi P47T N 4(l � tf l*A 71 . fl-oliv 7 0, W." Utto: 4f -6 YTS i Ao� vowb w4", fv 1.1,44,1+4"0 Awl At" _- -.Vlit ton, I* I JAW, A W, 'XI r % 4j' V. U; - Is 4o ,4 wo 16 wl. K"' T4 Aw! A- AW 7W t 4v r" 41 vl tA I Ott lot- a , 4 " A"', � - i I v. JL ql, od 'V L i5, q -lot Y.v �i�-ow of', xw J414 -040". -v Vi ti A# 1. 4i OT I `c' _4 i4itku,c Uo Jit 4t 'TOW E[ - �' .:i-v' 4 ,tf " h `� • s � � '��'?' ��xNf.:.�T � T' �G�i ,z F r ,y. „ti . d 5 ,'t .R. ^"' � :�4s, .,_2• • ..r i r U4V id w0v VOL- X-11 vo Oft QV,u �l jL Its tbo WO" F-V 0" 0 ik* qi� If fm paq), At, •1, �v, 11P - - IV, - 11M -,-VI-��,; ,,�t�,.,-�J, �-t, I 14 , I - 1, l. -4, ,� ,,�' � ,_;." 4% - 41 % 1. ,, - �.,� � - - - L i", -. '� .4. ., .----�%� - • - . �, " � '. - I � -_ � . I '.. "Z-f 1. -, - . - -F, -,�, ", . . �. -- - I- `4 � i ".", !_ I 1, - - S . - - �* _� - i �- _- �� 4 _ i" ,. ,_ , , � q . 4 " j � , -;-'.., - V - - , j, ", �-_, " , -P . " 'I 1, . ". I , _. - I %t• , , "'. . . - , ,,.%,. .A ,� 1 ! %t '-w-I.-.111 I "I, � J .,. :0 "t ;- , ;li , t . ,--,;�:,- ` - .:'I i-. -V - - - - �r -s . ')#,I. , .f ,l, I ?�` ± - , - ,- - ", k �_ . . - --,. r 1 _ -it, , T �, , �, - ,I .,,� %� ,,.� �_ �t o' � --,: ,,--- ,, , �r " . �, i6�, " �.. � I - --- - ,,�4` ,`t � 4, i '. e ,e A I'!." � , ,W_ ��'Ij .��, - 1, - a I I ., I ,�%�,�2_�;It,?Jw, � � �, ,-_ i:-- ,i�i.,-.-%, t " 4 t -,.�,- ",� " W'" -- �% . I- .. - , �� , t ,, .- "'. i"! ,"#- -, t,_ _._ ,-4- _-�'.,;vri �q �`-_��-.:�-"�,-�;�, '*,�, I . , " ,� -, ,,�i�7f x , , -It; u �, lz � �-". v A.t�,�,_' "00. , W - , . , , -, . � I-- , , 1q, � lt.z� P. �,�j ". 'p.. -� , zc . • �. �_, * , . , �, . ;I."-- I -tl j", - _, �_!� .. " �_ IA : 04.`� Y, -,, f "-,�,-_ " I - �, "'. -tl -,�--,�',,%,Z; - - , - . .:,&�.� �! YT, .�)�l ?4 4 �: ., - t - . I.'. - 'l . . N, -% . - I �.� _ � �. , , . z - , - , , " , - -, - , ", .,,,�'. , 1, z'rQ,V- .V-. �, .f - "_ 4y - IV I" - V , 0 - - . if-' -.!._", ... 1 1 %. '* , - A *,v:-, ;.-r -- j*', - _;to .. -.�, -�� -1 4 4�v�,�� ,M, � , - - -P. ,it A.U, ,, . ,:I � - � _'l �:-. .�� ,k f ` , - . - - 4 - --- , '', F" . - % I., � �� -!, .. . F, t -, , -,I-,Y" " .- I .f ; �1_ � . - , � I ,,�� ,,,--. _e �_ , JO.1 '_ ,: 4-�, � e ,,,�*,,�, -t.-," , - i .-,-, �`-. , - T,� a, f-A ,-,,--t " , -, 'a. , I _ -, , � - .. . il, "- -� e --t!: .0.4#-�,,,,,��'. • Iry#- " ., " _ -, A I t . 1� �., (, . , 'ir ,,- �. . � - , . . 4-1,� � , & - I 11, � ,,, , ,,C;�� " . i , � ��' , �r , V. , I I. , i � I" It- �k, y ,f ,�,- - �,%- A I I ., . , . 14 f I " , , I ,.J�;r - ��_; ,.-,!,�. ""', �_ . - ' . -.1 -4- - - � ,t��% - . - � iFj 4 W, � ,� �� , - , ,t .. ,,, Ib '�., I �. Q'I � � � 1�. ."',�,� ez 'Ir I �.A _� I ,,��, ,�, . - . ,� - . n* - - , - . r ,,_ -, -.,� , . , ;,k. ; '� ,� - , - .� - '? �- - -", .-I, - ., - •. �4_ '. , .. ��, 14 . 01�,^ - 1, .. _4 '.4 , " .� - , , 41 1 �I:r - - - F � �, - n , , I �' .-- t� '. -- .�� - - -.I-..e - , ,- . .� - _�f _4,:�; �'; " , -- , t, .��.�- F " , I *.? - , 4 , �, . , ��,- q9" , Z.'%P-c�.-,-- - - �.,4.'_ p i� ,-. t -, -, , ,.'' ! -j�, � j ,� , Vljy' - , . '. '.��-� -_� � -,` ,f' - ',-;, � -. - . , , , .., . , , , - - �'. k�3..T. � -,- - . 44 ., -i6. �,Z 1!..:t,�, �.7, , � -�',�, . ", � -r - I I I � �_` ", `�,, - '.,;. 'k ,.:. P:._,4_' ��. . t , -,4,z-, -, � , _� � - ,.� _. . .-''-A '��4,�_4 -, j ,N- jjr.- , 0;�:�� .9 ��4� , I, , �, ,,,.� -x.,w. - -v ,__.�: 2, � - 4, 4, 't". r�/ � cS . .1 , . . I k- .. .., ,,,, . '14 4�t.L * ' " �',,i' - f'x'., " " 4-.,;,.,, -I , ,,F� "Y; ", � q, - - - - - .� , - •� � A'.",] ht", , � , .-� -'- �� 5', - A ,�' � ..; ., , ., , � j , - 1, � Z,,_ . - ,- A��,_,:�4:�4,., -� 44� � , . . - . �!�,,',�;,� I. k-�,l - f� � - -, -, % - � -� ,�,:.. - , - ✓, , ", 1, �--k - - , - - I �, 6,-,. ,� 4 � ; ' " . . A'.,'-�,�-�-, , ,',A,� ,, , ,'- ", lt 'j!", t,- !,,;;,-, ;--f -i " tea: , -`� ,.',,A,-e '!"", � - p , .,,t,,, �q - .+_ - � , . . _* •�k. .�b -- - 1! -,� �-;' Z , 0 1 - , It � . , " '� , - I&- ��, ., . - ,� -_ - , , - " .. : . V '� �';� P"T %',X..'� -;-IF 'J'.!�,' , '4" ,� '11"T -� - - �- --� �- -Fe�, .1, "., -fji. , , , - ' , " * � . .-,)-# - , -.-. -,.,? z ,It�-�- �_ �;, *.' .", Yl - . ,I -.%� I -A,- - ,W A . �kLl;-,�' 1�4_ , -."i.. z; � " . .-;, .$. . %, ,'j 1, . " --. , -,�,- ._-.,,��J,s Q,, . '7� ,•:, t,-,- - � � , ".�, � , 1 4,�, � " �' i .'-, , .. � - I .1), , " 't " C., ",. -.�7-, - , .- � ,,�. � - ..i -1 1 a '. -'x,!: 1, - , I..., �I .. I.,", 4 T '- !�" - - - .1�1 % " ., ,-I , . , I - �J. . - , � I - , K � - .. I "-c � � -. _t, I., , - �. -, ��, .Z* ." W , I., I I % ", ?. - � -F� I.. � � - i�z � 5,�, _,,"_" �� #, �_ .11 It " _- _�_i_ Of'.0 ., , �- !&. " - 0 . . 7_�;�6 -� ., 4 ,\_ . ,L - . - � , - -- - - �' W� - -- w �X, . . - % - •I � � " � I . _ . , " ,�- �* " -�-_,�-�,�,v jv, " ', 4P', n, * _ -. I . , � - � .. _A. _ e , - ;"."i t� ; . �:�, , ,!..i ��_-- 4,p -2� � • '-., - �, - � ., - ,,., - , l ..- 't --� -A ; - - ,t?, i r i , .". A ,e�,. � , '. - _ - - �., I 0 I -1, . .. , - f. � . - 1-1 � I-e 1 ;�.6,;6 . 4, , 1, I ., - " , " 1"Z; 4 -.',- , i - -,,,,,,- - �� , . , - , T -, _: , I NA - � l, - -1 � '. 1, - - -, - , `�, , .-, -r-O�, '%..,,J "; " t , ._�t 1 .4,1- � , • V': " ,,, 'I .� I ._,_ ,$; 1 �� , � I . �� I � , " "tf -6� % , ,A*,,',. . :4% - � ��47,z ,,,e.-.,, ,:� - � a _! ,�?., _� 1. 11, _. , � - �, , , - ..,J-. , . I '. 'j, A- , . - , , � 't- , 1, - ,,, f. 1 , �v- .v� --- ,;,,!':-* .. ! '. - 'i " -, - r. - � - , ,*� : , . .., z ., '. ., ,, ;. , , ;� ;'.-, t - ll',,�, � , - ,-;-,,, .1, '. -� -," i , � � Z-4, -1 I 11 �. - -,,�, " -,'�! 11, t , , I , , i A t�_ , - -i_4„ _' - , � ' '�..p� '�-"_ " '114 ":� *.:'4t- . jr T : I -, , � -1r, - , �-V, . _,, .� '.. � - . , j �', , 'i ,,,�% �_,.4 ", , ;: ,�.,.�'Aq,`�. !,4ef�� 1, �; "� o; V�.", 4 :� ,',� - - t,e , -,�'� � !'.' . . -- '_ , ";4 , - - N - , ,�- �1' i I_' 4,!, -4- r" 1�� • - , W.4�xr' �' !,- 3, -, , --,'--' ,,-, _! _.�i, - -,_ , -,w- - �, ��AA, . , ",� , ,,,,, � . . �, ., , � , - f. _7.. . - ..�;e., -, �r , 1� 1. � --I�j �-�- <� .-W , .�, - ZI � . , . T,_ � T ,r,i,.", '., � ,&, ,; 1, , - '�111' -IL I . tt . I - �k:_ , ,� : ,-�- , 1, - - , - , " I* 11 � 1,4_1 - ,;, 4 -'-' l; - -� ',:, r , , . .,", - z -, �,:�",�.L-. ,-, � �J_ _'., , %;�X, , ;an' .. - - . . " .f ,.��. "ll. , I � - - - - , �11, •:,m ,_7 1, 1, �I, I .� -, e � T, �- � � I - ,,, - - , "'.. _ - •_ I , � , ?!� !,:- ,� 7" � , , , 'e_3" ---�-. - - .4 .t , 'r - - , -',. ' � I.-'r .19 �,?_ - - • 1�1 - _'4, . ! - � ,I , � "e. -° � � x ,- .1i , �, .. 1� N �,;��. -I!.-,'---"-Y lc� "'. ��t , � _. , - - - '; -i- , or .�,- " �, '- ., - - , ',� - :!�7,t ',!!r. �",?A, , % . ,� ,�`� -, -.� ll, 0,,�-t.. -� - .-.1 - .44 ifv. � -, , ".`� , * - -'v , 1�1 .. '.) - . - - 4".11 . ". � - -, - - . -1 . - *., •r.'. .� �. - , -4t; w - I - � 11 P" Ii, :. �, .T� , -, *' - -- 'j"," I I .. p .I.- - 1. - t, .,',,�I� . I- . �,� , - " " ,.% • . " � . :I � ,?- I.. - 1- . . - ", '.. �' , �� 'i J3 - - . - V - " - , . - '.�v , -, 'k - - - - , . �� r - I- - -1 _ V, n'! '. � - - , 4 ll • ,�;, f � - t, - , 3 - ._� . _)It .� - - � `1 .1 �. yk - 1'4'- I .11. , � .j -t , - .t� ,f; " , , - ,_ . - _, � . . - . .� , ,,, f, , �. , - vt .'� '_ e - �" , I . " - - .., - , � .. �.1_11 . I- *� .1, - .� ,A,.'A,)�V,(, - < , . .;-- " - Ng . �, - -! .14ft , " . 3: - . � j. , � ZI -, - ,*_ ,-" - , , 40 " " A *_ , v ,Z. * *_ 4" - iilw I C , M_ _-It"', , - � .", , -, , a� - , , . -1 ,� ; - fl : ,., � '. .,A , p ,'V � , , .. *, , _A , I_- ,�.�, . V k�l , :z,. , J. " � ., I . � , .k. - -:1+".''• .1, - , � � AS ''-e ` !'-�;,.�, 0, i� %- *, . 11 - " ,., ,-,..;p .-, ", ,J�% -. � ,,�- .., I .. 'It X� . - t. - � . I�V F - v � __;� - � I"f_- - , V, ��.';�I_ ..j, --- 44"".,4 - ,I .,N f , � - � •I . N`* ,%�,- . , ,; �� _ , � . ". - i � , - � p � *, -,!,. 4 �, .1 � 1, ,"."k,t, - ; , �' .-N ..., I I .1.11 I . � I • ( . � �� '. �j, "� .:�, 1 - N� - , q - 'IF, -,.O.-� t " " . '� ".'V , -e�" - , , 1, , 1 , - " � " � 7., _4 . � c � .; k i - �', ,� f i'te". t, -� , " �._.,V __ . � -- ,q,-. �.�% ,,, f I ,� - - , . .0� 17" W, , . I I ,,� ,Z,. - " 't. 1. � F 1, A 0'. ,,, " � '. I ; �lV- - 9. , f-i �_ t, 0 - , " . , i, . I .?- 3, - .7 �'_ , " 6, �' `�k- .� -,----. ,.� �e, , , lit , , , - . I 1, ; � I , " -1 ,��_,_'_ - � , -.1 �_ '. --�; , %14.� �i.!, - 1. , . I - ♦" " .� ,.I'- I . I � �.. " - . - -,�- , V, �," - ". q , I �v � -;.� . , - -,�`tX -.,-,-�-?`-(� A _ - "� 1 �', L, "' ,_%' ;� '� ;- ,,:!.,i ,",1%,; T 4, 11 It'- * . %�j �. , ji., ., � -. , , I - ,�-' -��.Nr -0 ,, ,-,� ".;k-�,� 0 � 1, . � - -- 1. " , tom, :�t . � AV. � - wmv. l , , - . �vc I -�, ,, �,, 'K_ �4. " "'. I . , - " - ! I � 'k, • � � , , '`•!` . q. , � 14- , ",,. . , � '.1 , �_ ., , I ;, - . - I I - �4 1 :0- I __ - - ,- � ,,,� 4 0 W,...- - � , � .'.2 - - �.� '. ', . ."'..""",� .0 �, . - � , , -1. •A I. 4� --j't - ,-,-,. • -,-"- '' . .__ � 114: - " Z"t .� �, �, , � � � . �f,N _. , � I - - -1 . !Ii- � , , � A �,, , I � I j - . le" I 4 - -;; .� . .1 • I - - L '�, 'i -_ 'e�.I _ 1 - , _", ��, I " - - "I - - - - ,. ,� _': - . �A �o * , ". * , r , �- ,"i- , , _. . ; , � � I 'p. I 11 � r. O", �t.;z ,�;�,.`-,�: -� �, � - F , - - . . % � , , , . I . I -, ,v �* If 140 . � - , , - I . 1��__ , I - . , � ".1, ,% , - - *.� . - . _ �� ,11 -, * � ", . � ' I - , � l. � ., - - : I , Mt , ( #tfotr � , . � r e . . � . � , , . � - � I '- I �.-, I -* '�Ct �;k - _%. , , , , i - ; P, � � V� - - *�:14�40 , rl�' O . .% , - . �j� k _ll ♦", � ;, Z-' .. w� �- � 6' . i 1� r :"k �j ti Ze"Zv ; - • � " -A - � ' ,7 , I *`�` ��; - - - - , , - �* N, , ,,, -- , X�, � � - . - , it, I . - -4 -� '�; fX -'� .�v � , , , , , , - , `> ;L , , � : � , " Z �, 'It W ,*' f�, 4 - * ' - - _ ' :�' .' '_ " ' �- e !, , - -Ui " , . . f , - ,.Cr" - , �, q, L't, , , � - , ,4, � ";� OP ,-, 'Y -_ , .4- .,., -. ,_ , i - ,_ � .. # . , �, , ,� ", i -oZ -�, �, •, I �. . - - �-,O ., , ., , 44 Ow � . - . I .,. � , .., - - I N . I �_ .. -., , X* X W - � P. � F " .. , -,,� `� . ., I, T - N "k, , -r- ; I- - . - � "A , . ARP9FIRI, w I , �j .. " � . . 0, �-I, . - . - . - - -09 , - k .,'r , , ;�� _�V�, 4044 , .* 4A " - i� - . ". ,, - T_ p - , , _.�� 1'r . V ., , � "I - - 17 N_,� I - 1. 1. -, . -, � - . ., .1 , '� , �,)_A .%.� 'I . , 11 � - _� _7�. , -, e-1-2- , � . -q,� - f .'-,?.)�, ,1;. - gt� , I � I, L�, ,WWW" , I 0 - , . ...� ii*411*40_04" 0, I " - , ) ,_a � 4%a 0, ,;..- .�' '-_� t I � u.:- i - - - I � , . - - .... , . � ",, % 34-1, .,� &; " .., , _�� - ,�-.-_ I"", A, - -,at% I ,;-r�� i l, - • - - . I _�I' . . - . . . . . - %'. � , . -,V . . " . . _ " - : " , '�!t , �-.: -_ -. - - f . . -1 . I . � -1 e , . - - , ='('r' 'IF , _'sae;' 'a,: ". . . . I I " I Z�.� I . . - 3" ,,��. - �;`i ..? ,�t I-V � A- - - � . - - �r . , iA .,;I",\. " � - I . - A.Z. _ _"*,_M . � . ". -),,j ,,l,% - - - , "� W I 7 , � ; 2 1 ,,�-_- S'. , . t VI*aQ.4*R*I-' 1%, ,,i-�-�,'�,,,,'-?--:t,..�-.-,i:� � I . - I " - , - -, - 4 0, " 11 " - '1� 5i " _.�,s - , t I _40 'u,".1" - 5 � �*- , 0,71� ,'�Zl " . I .. - - I �? � ,", ; - , - ".. -;�" .4 . C,3!' �,,-� -. ... j�� , " -_` 4' - " . ". - IZ r, •, V . - �- I " � - 1'% 4 `Ij 1 • - . I - . �. *- - - mZl,'.� - � . "., - --Y,,','_'�,t <;i,vl.,� ", joi,ok , ( . - "r I , 1 - --- - - .% , _%l- - W. , - '. �, .1, 1q,'-, ,,� . ,.-'�� 4, ..,is�,� r .., . . "I' , �, , Of ". x #�, - 6*f, .� . 4 41W , - -,,:.4.1' , ., - .- , . I ,*, 7 - ----- I - -, -� 'r � I,;%�2`.".,_-_, I .14 �11 I •- .1 . I .. . -U t 0 ., - 4�.., L. , , , - - .- '.I - - I . � lftf! 4 I , -1. . - . ,--A 4 � , , Z - : ", -, - - i ow W', * - --- --- ♦- -.. Y, . - ;!� . I - - "", 'T - I I,.. ,- - .., " I'mr I - I 4 -, ,'� ;. --� f- " * I i 0 0, " --,# I (w I k LLL , t"C', , __, : .. 11 , - , " 0. . � . � , ,;,?,�� .11 - . 4. 11 & 'i-, - ,- - . I I - , , W, (A , .T �'� ,V�;. .0 �,.�, .i�-- ioa, ,;, A _* -Y " I ii I . _VV, , , ;,.- ". ;-, •.. * I " � I - � - V .1 J* 0 . . , - � , _q .., �11 � , .�, ii�k 1110 I _� ,v ', I i I I— � I .0 I . .. z1aig I 1 . " I . I I I - - I , . . - PkI. v - . -- ... , , � 1;1 �" � .. ,_� I 'C I -,I, 't If, 4-, -,;� .k. " .- .r.. ... � , , . -v , e. - 4, It ,.W_,P-,- �-4 - " .� IV, - y IV! " � 7 -, . I I ; I t r xo,,�..h-� . I �, - . . 0 . Ii. I j " - . 0.4" , :, ,-;l " " , ; ._-.s - � -.1 , t q,. ,,, - -�_, -� M - � - , I v 1 ii,7 -, i -.,! ��. �,--, ". " "o-I . 1, I - , r', 11� , 4, . 1. � I I I I . � J(�, � I - - - - , I lf� , I - -, 6 - 101UNW, � . ", , _,� _,�, ,,�% - .. , �t, � .-.-�'_-" . Owl 11 " I *1 f, �:�, 6.3.0 , ; __111 i - . , � �, , ,,-- , ., . , .'�,� _, _,�, -%: I : -I4' ?. , I' - 'IL W . . I .1 . � , ,_ . . -- " I , I - I - '4� � � - , II 1 7 - . I 1_ . ..,•t, _ 11�;_�i .4 . - - , , -.",il - I-, pv, '�'.- z ',- i.,.. It .4 "I I* -k-ft i.�,��,f' �_ - - :.- � 1- � �;_ Y� I - i - - - - . �, - I , wwwu - , ,-.. 44kt 44 t10,- ,w �V_*,. � . - , � ., � ... I A-'..N At I - . - - - !,� I ., -4.4,- ""Fx., , -;�� 1'� ,-.!. � , I . N' :', �.` . -, � •-- I - .- '. � ; - - - .i . - � - ,�t-". _ � -�', I ,, A46"" 11 I %, �" "i_rL.I. A � ',,;. _ - i - - - � � .!r I . V I . �. , I - .... ... I ��. - _ �.11 , , _", � . -1 � , - " , I _4 I 4 - 0 , _T ", ! �., _,W' yj� , - - ,-- . ,�,�;, , ."_I, .:-, � - , 1: _,. �i, - " ItWo . � I" 1, .. I . .r i, 4��.,%,r,,,�* , . , - - . - 10 * AAW'.) ", -, �! . I . t� , , _141ii `A I � - . I . � il, , � �" � .- , 4 7 -.�-_l - 1, It, I _ - •. I -, - - - � ;: . - �* *0 0111 . W, � .1 . �, I 7� I- , , - I- - '1� � - - - .., d � I - . . x 1 , , � , � - . � I - . " , , , * lii 'L - , " - t *1 , . I .11 . . - - " �', 11 �, , -, � 1 4 - . .1 I t % J . ,.�, ___ ,�, .1 . I 4. -**-* •. - - .�,�.�,� �_ -0.4 1. ', �AA v _, ittqu* , , W - ��:_ -:I yhg": - L , - - , ,� f - " , � ,. I" � I -,,.,, - .-- , _ - -.-, • .4- ,_Y�_�. . -% + t ,I!rl��_4,vv '� -4 I- - , ,- '' ;-- .�,, .- ,,- ,, 1, - , . , -"-Io - C .� .�, -, . � ,7. : , t.t_.--,, - '. , , 0- � - . - , . V, - , __7 - f� , , ,4 , , 11� 1-4 � A; � - , t', , � ,.,� -q, ; 1- 1-1 - . . 11�1:1 . i'1,7�, :, - I V t I 1, , � , 1, • - "" , *i , i . , , ,� - - - --,, '�I' - ", - ---. f� - . " " - " i. � 1, �; I I '�. 1". t � , t.15.."., Ti. �- ,� , 1 . , .P4 , " � " , - - , x, '� ;. I - � - . . I , , '* L-A , II . I . . ,; � ;� '. -� - 1 , 4 !, , - , - w �' At". " � , , , ,04�w, -.14, �, ,'-'. g.; ,,� �, - _ � - , � � , 1 *4 - - , ,11 , , "k. , "V--ol" 4" � _. - .. .� --: - ., - -4 _..".-�.- _ � , , , , ", . � --- , r< - - - 4 � - - - -�-, .1 t4l v ,- 4r- -��;Z% -� - "'i, _."� � 0 A, .,J ,:! - � . . I . , .- , , , �, • , i A, -�-"-,,.:�j�; '-, L , �11 1, "t -�L i. �,� - , _. I i'_;k��; �'_�'_ L - " � v , I � - .�� I , 1, - - - I I . . I - I I - � - - '! � ,�� •� � -,,^ , 4 " '�I' � , a-�:_ - 1 �,4 " .A 0 �,j-- • 7 *"., _� - "Al.- , ,;', ". . , � ,.Fs. - *�" , 4.�, '211-11 , , "... '. � . . .�� #,�,. .1�4�',L_ .�-,* '�; 4' , ,� 11"% , z "p, ,,�N •- _r -e, - � -4.,�, � ,,. -4- �, ,',r-�-e-'. � -1 L ",; ; - � ,�� I .. ,j -1, -at , �' 4.1 '-' � ;� . • t , , , , ,-�,- "., 1. - � " - "'. -fj! r , ,., � �', wj, "i0I*__0* - -, � - � d� � - 1--... I 1. - . 17�j � . , , , , - ., , t, , 'T I- � .. '.. I 'i � , � � Z'� ,, '._ L, .. ,��, - , .�# . .. , _� - ., "I� . .1 , , , , �jt � , -4 * F � _V; � ". � � � �, � , - I . l, .,.,-,. t � - .,t,- -i' 4*.kf ,i�.�_ ,- t, -f 4, -t-, 1�_ 1-Y I 1. . - ,',�r , , , - . . I .- I ;.;" k; r .-J. S-- - ., I - , - f, '. � - " , - - I..1, ,_i - - . �_ _ - . " -- ,-��, - _ .-, - -. '. . . %,:2 - - - I :, .11 _ , � 4- _ _, -vi , i. , _�, A -� ,7 � i -, I - , _- X, - I.. - � . � . , - , � -, ii .� .�. � I I � � - - k, _ .- -�- . - , , . LI , tl,'V, -., ,,, I!t .., - , , ;-E, - , , _ , _, i I *,-l: � -, 0 - I"- I � '� If _�_.,� ,;" .I- "al '. , ... � . � �, �, _.: , , , 1� , N " , L.. -fr. ,,, *I, - - - - � , . i .- " . � - - - � Vq,,,7 ,:.-,, ' •I �'. , , , " - , f,f r,i * ,'z -, �,, , , - :,.�.. �, , . I " -il I . ,� � :; I I - ", `(t -T=#'• .- I I ' _", 4, - ,,� - 4Z44 . - I I �,',. , . - -_ . w . � .1 I. � , " . ._, ': ., " ". V I �_ . - N , �, , � ,�, - , - - "�, � I � - v -W.-. �,-S.* .4" �.,;.��h-_ i.-,,,, I . 11 , .,��;t* N_ .1 , . "I � , .d Z - - - ... � , -,--.'�-- � � � _� , �F '), I y- , * , I - - - I .. I . . ,-r I 11 _�, I 4 4 - - ..- •V., .. -- -.V� '.', - . I , -A, .1 �, I _t .I,P,.' s 4i ,* - ".'p , I . - , - � It,- , I -A-0i" , _� T V, I -,� ll- . , I - 'l � . , ,; q - . I . , 1. A , -, Y 7'. - ♦* I -i , _�A , -, -,i - JiA7.1 � .��14 A; 1� - _� , - , I li,, �. ". . , . '�� : �, L � I , , . " �' �'... �� , �;r, . - ;�t* ,�,, i i I � I .-VO, ,,�e� , " "r.4 jr,k,lf 1� , - , , � "... .., , -�., .. . f, " , - l: , , .. _ � �' .-. L ..' .1 - v � , " �,i -1,; .-f- r, -, ;, � . . � , , U� ��-�-"-";, , � . - � , .. , . � , -, I . . •,,,� I .. � - " " , , - ,It 11v - -� .. ,'. " ','� - 4 �"- * " ? �- v - ''a.-Y' ,% , t " -S, '-. - . .%. ,, 1,. -.,, , " � " 1';,�".`*v ,,,%- ` . �, " ,%, � I -, , -,, .r 1".4 � .. '- . ,,� . � - ,:� , '-, - -�-e � .le-, � 'k� ", , '.', I I ';�I �� ,� , - . . - � - i:;- , - - -, . - , .j., . -bf.�_�_-: , � � '_ ,,- `,,t5h,, 4-s , I , r , , , � -� - �P_i 1-:1: -;� - ,,I! ,;4: . , - - , " - - -, -'t k.- , , . g ,�'- � - , , j. " � - , , j & i,4 ."', ."; . . ".W. - v I , �'_ 4. . - � , s " '�, . .x "; r1i * �- - . , , . . I (5."�'I, : �, 1 _-_41-I'", , �.,, �� "I w-, . . - , ." - .. .1 ' . '�,� - I ., , . - ,�%_�_ -.�_� . _ _ * - '. � :. ". ,_ � i C, . , .., , - - - .., � �, 5-'�L � - ,�,� - ,- ,,- '�_, �_,_?4��,, 1-4: .. Al 4, •:�,";I�I_ -.---" -k 'r, i L�_ 1, - I . -Y . �qt �� - , - I* I -i -1;9t...��,� " - , ,�,,. ,,." - -1� � , , "k , . � ,... I . , . - , 4'. � ",, � ,,,�, ., - "sr, - - 4, ., .4 ". - 4.#. . - U�, � � _� .j, - . N . 1� , � . Ifo�---- , z -` � �;_,A - ite •- �`I* '. S5 .. .'-,-' � ,,-. -..,; - . -i7,- - � "I-" �14 V.�, � � - 4,1:�-, )�%k - o - 1� -, - , ,�'t ,�,��` �, !%� i - - - - - ,� - � -1, ,-,, - �, ,�- �� . -- - , . I �J.,,Ilq �. - - ,9 ;,.= 1 -1 � . � __ I I - �'L, 1'�',� I . - , - ,* - � "i'.�,;, . , _. - �'! , _,t , - "j, - i �,,� - - - 2._S -. V , _ , �, *� �, - % - -, , . - I - -1, , , . . � I - 't,,, ��,!-'-,7S_,_��_.j_ .- �� --,.L * �-,) 111i�:X.,: " � �". � -, N� 4 t ,�- . , "6 +., :. {\ - 1 _46 1 *, ---O� - , * L,v ,4, ; " _'� * 1 2 -1 % .!;� . -1.",L -1-.. .W. L � ;i.. . j-� .�, -- l ". � __ . �;.,`�,t-_,.-�_�, - '-�-*4�:'�, ,� -ji, ., . e, _� � - - -�- :,, , �-, _. � It r �_ � " , - -, ." vj,.� - -.1- .�Ii�,, � . -,v-i: - , -, _... _,4- .%7? , . _1 I . ?,!i�q . I te` -, �� " - - " -.4 �)�' � 1�' - �. � �. �- " .� 4 , iq-r _', t ,__ _,; �; , , __ --, :':_,�-`,z -%�` '' ", L - " _$ ': � Is, . �4' �, - ,4.- . ,4L, , , 31. - - _' - � ".' '� " -��'q�',' ', - 34 - -.,- F , � w 4*-~. I " _ �Z, yr- , - _1,J�I - - Q �.t��'. _. � -. �'--?L�'V' .'j, . , a - .i� ".1. , .Y� ", - . " �., , �? ,�, ! � . , . 1 �,��,;-,..�: . "t- .. - - lj� - 1�--,,;,O�,,it - -1 ,.;, I .9, A. . - i • ".'r lr� '., ��J' jtl',�� - � - %r I ,- * " -.4, ." I n , , .1. � � � t: 4, ,, ':p - JIk , 4 , I - . . . _A�% .. - - ,i-. ry -�- , v k - P. ` " .." , .,t,X,v ., 't. " - . ". Iv I" , . . , Nj I . '*, .t)? - - . - - " U. . - . - - - - - - il "' " "of Iflow.00 , . - , - - .1, , I., �,.,. - i � , -is"WW, , ,�,.i 3 � ". ., -�",n- � �, � -- �, X '. ,,s� � v., n-,-, - - � . %_ 1 4�, 'I , - ,4�,". 5 -.- . - �4 4, 11 ., " ,�� , � - - i . , �� •.-, ,_" - - -.,�� .1 I 1� • � " ��. VI 04" 1 � � - . , �. ., , " -� - - ;,-, , K. V�O - ; .'I ,-.-,,' � ., � I - �v Too � __:,,-�,, . ,A-a I , I ,E " , , I -, - ,� t-�- , - t - .0- � A - 0 ` v If , ��A4 'r,,J, � Z I. iv, , , ov I I .�'L -,, _J;�_ -'4,WV -1 4 ' "6% �� 0-'--,,,,-1 ., . � -I .�- -e - -�_, . . , -1 , , "L" I�i . , ,'tl 4 . , I V 4. -u . . � �'' ,�.�L'i��. • ��', .., , , , ... .i., �t�14.-r-,.�:' - , , - r, ,f ,V, t, .�',Z, - _- " 't I -,� tt4',7, -, � -4.- _- f , _N I __ -,( - � .� .!. " - 1. _. _ - . � -Z - 07, .1, ,,-..-g,. -�; ,�,`,� V , ,,-,,,. I . 11 4 - -,,. '.i' . ,� , . ��_ lt, . _,, , � !, - ',;i- 't'-i,`#` ' , p, ;,4�, z , ' �N, 'r ,% 4k. - -,- - L-, � - "' }.'' {:d„ - I - , " 1. I � - - , 4t_ �, '. . - - t ,:� _. i , � � - N ,1 - ."!t � � - _ , '! .!��, .�-. - .. , , . v - �'- ;,% - -, -e IRI I � bL I ,'a- 1 - ,,, �: i •I , _ r ; � , .i7 '-f " .� .� F .1 _o_,;- 1:tl� .V, � , I � ,;� ,. 1. q. - t . , , " . , , - k .� j . �, - . - , 401",-, - - ,�,�� . -- 'I, 1 - �. I � .. - A , _K - - . It •;1,c - .� " , -,j , " - �. U.."., ,�.;. -k ,�', I , _VvI � �, -1 ,-- i'%�,� ,,r- �r � V� ;-� - , •I . . � - � - " , I 6, , V " :�- . j ".� ."", -IL, ,T� �. -0 , " - . J, , - " , , - � - - .� t'�,,�-,, - �d - k4, F , I'j_'_, t � ��'�'L - "r "' ' ' . _,_-Ot - --, I ." - -�; ,- -� . - I . . ♦ t., �!�e , ., - �, ,��- - J ," ,,� -.. - �� s�, � � � . . w . - . - .,,ft$� - h I �,�% 't" I 'i. - , . - 11 . -`� I I , •- . . I , ii%_A`L . j"Jt�,,:�;? ,,�;.;, , , , 's - , 1, _.�MlAl � Al I _� , i - _ -.. .1 . � 7 F _,,�� _ : . 1. t. dl - .� - I .. I . I .k �_,.. , _-, �,. , - , I., -- � � - _t ":I'.,_;j'I- " r.'r w -- �Vl� ,, If, 1 '." �, -, , f ; - , �: - •.. 'm , . .11� z. , It, ..-..,4 " * k , - -, . � - �,'. - - I!-, �*, -_ . , , . -, -p Ii �_,44i,�.-� a :1, .; .1 v. ;;�x,�", �,- ''t - , 4. '"', - , ,�, - - - -4 41 �4 ". .1 � I I � ., ?'; . - 1,, a I v , I �. .7 �: � - � -�-.',' - - , , ,.�I " L.". ."+' A . ,, " ., . , , - � I'll .�; j,� ., � -.0- 7. �,- ;,-��O-* -4-J �__ , -fi,? * � � 'i .� - z � � . . ;tl - ��- % �- � .- '- " - , -, �, ,, ,�F.,I L W. A .1, 4.,11,4, , ;:t ' !-'� '. .. ;- �., r .. . , vid_e_i, , , , - �1- i't, I `l"V, .� .' ,"q� ,;;.� 'J.-, ��-,� I,"-,. " - - � " 1 -,7 � �*r,r 1� " ��. .. ,�A,! -,___""��I-e__,.,_� �, - - p , - --�x � ,p � ys . - , . " Y - .. '-;i�7-- --I " 1 , -, • -j z"k-; -, , "j" ."; - r- . �. , ." � 4v 17 .4,4_ - I - � - ,,-- " _r ", __ '. . - .. - , , - -% 1� . '. •, � 7 ,,A 4 ,YL, � . I , , , ,,,, - l", -1� � , ,4" •1 .K, ., - -,,,I,v "r... - I- - •jo;� ", , `,� � %'. �;V 0, i - , ' ': .1 . , , � . " � "';I:_.4 , . .It,! I, ,,,, I �N . I.. - � " _"_ - - c '-X. -, -Z. , - , Z -,-..,. - , - - �� "XI , '-.4 .- 7� -1, jj � -, . Z.; , �' t '%�� _,j ... 1 4. ,," I , .. J:4 A, , * � , �b �-, - - ,.,,�! � 1 -4 Z"' , , 'T': ,�,� ._.- .-,:, li-r* - ' � :,Ikr.� - Z"f� - ,�, 4,*6 - , - A"', �,j, � , , I - I , : "" _..,,,Z.L ,_,�� ,, . -, I " t, 9 I -% �- !,A, - - -` . � ♦ . Y _ _`� i - i% 4' L � , , , s„'. , , . - , ,-. .-�-, i , ,ip,-,t . 1;:. 't :rl -, W�4 ,� ��-- , 1,.�. k�' �._-- , , �,,'�,�. V, � ". - t , '!�T ,�.t " -,:N- . " - -- - ."'. �', L "_"7� _%�' - , �. ,-* " � , - - ,?;- a , ,�!, 4'j-', 'i I ,.4 1-7 - ,; � .. I'A'j "�r,' �' � , , ,�-L, - , o. .", i - , . . sk `t-'e'kl'f�, �',,- '-.. , " � _ 11 - .,Z., �,,, _ .. � '1M. I �, , �� , � I ��, � I ;" , ` - - - , , � L 14 -1 ..! .!, " " 1, � , , , % , - " , - 'J� "' , _� - , - I_ I- ". , i , -, - eel!. V'l,. _.,; , I .. ,� - . - �. .., 1, - S �r,:�t, , - , � ,#.A-, -��""a,i ,,, ". � !�' �,.c v , � -, _. , . "� , - �Z - - 1,-�� 't , r,� 9 I I- ",'L_'� _'I, ., e,- ,-v � .tr , , 1: L ` _.� - , �i � _ ,._ _. . �k 1 3T'l , " �' I �.�, , � .1 . -, I - 4 I , . ". •1� , - � . � .6� , "� :,!, `�-��, 14, � _4 - a �?_ - , ,il , - .�.."� " . - , .jfz�r "; ",4!�f* - .,. .��'di6t," , , It, � . , � A ,e .. .- -4, -, /A, " ,--��, f,�_, i, .:� - '_ . _ ;,�,,�� - �T - 4,- %_ � t�, 'i -, � t. 4-' , �, :1, '1� � 1;1 -1 _%, ., . � Uj , .q� � - , 'j � - - co , - � I . L � , .VL�P.iiiaq k � ., � - ., iz. •. ; ,,,�;.. 'L i I � " , , , . . � k t_ ,,--'. " " -, �*!-,:" " , - Lf - i �L ,;�, '�4'A - - . 't'Fl, -s , . i, . - !,.'r , i p , '.7. .u-` �r �_ , . �N . , ' t' 6C- _-� "4 ci� Z_ L- -1., _. p - +, . L;� 1, - - ,1#,,� -. . � . ',�!, , .,- . � - . - , ,, .,,- 4;-4:.� , , - , - - ,�%. i'-'-�` � ;%,Q'll�-,�- ,:'-1;4__'_ , ". " i ?; Z-.V�� -..,',I - ..A A ., .. ", .. - t -�, .. � -- N , , ,-*I'- � , 0�-,,_ ! e , � .1 . -, . - i - .,,-,, - - , .. - 4 , - `� i+. f., - i . , �4,;.*--,.,7�,?*�, I ,�, -4 - �4��,� -T-V-� - , 111. ., � " . 1. , I _. � , ,� � .,�'. � � �, . - ,� P"'i , ,1, ,,t.� ; �t', '�,� • , ` , ., "-6. � , , � , , ,5r , 'r -S, . , � � -I -. ,! ', , " rw � - ;,j-,P;",��- 1".;., " ", , -,�. - ,;..T .; .r - - ,� , I " ,;Ji �, -�- , . , ,, �. '? , � I I 1� � . -41 • I �,l I I. _N�,4, - -, , ,7 • _ � ji", �,:; _ . �:i - - - - 1 ',- I -If-a-', I ?,. '_ ., � - - t,, � 4�-J, • j; ,.t i7 _- - j�'. < P��_--�','� "', I. � • 7� � " I , � _, _, I'", I f� 4-.L -, .1 ' .- .*� , ). _,-. ;� 4�_5 � _t. 4L , � *'�, - - � . . .1 - -, - ,,, - �, -� A , " �: � k, �',� .-;�k - , , ", , O`l �_ .), ; � L. _ _% .r, � � , - - � i it,� M. - - - - ? L� 4, , ,,, - T, Olt "'A � .- - , - 7" 1 L. ,E . ,:Ip. �,.' _ _� -, ."', �', , .- � _ 1 Z., . . �, � -,.�' � -, _...i .0 ,� -, - - , L, '. - , �., �_, - , - , ., 1 , _� I P- ,;NJ. 'k.� 3. �' � , , - , , I k. - � . � - - - i. -. - --I 6 -1 ,�L.' . � . .I . " : , v �.i &�-i, , - - , - "' , _. I , . '. , . -.- , '4 , �0. y _�, F� 1 - .. 'r, i�, � .,%.., i� ,� , - ., __,4-��. • �!� � , .%.., .1 _;_t j--',','- - .-�- " : ,_- _A -�; " -. I - 1p� �,, I.r � " J,Ov X I 1'.� -4 - ,�L -, , •, - , Ir - ", . � '. '. A ?. - � ,_'I; r� .. - JL�I - � - " , - -�,AA�.. _--_".A, -,:! ,� ,- � " , �R,g '-f., t -� , �; , , -1 .,. �;,A, I , _4 , , . t , , V) - _ _., --%I'I';' 'p L'i C `+ . , , I �,. , itki;. 4 - �'t-4, . kr- ,,�- t:", q, "I ; -- I ', 1. � - , - , ,_ , . ,�t, - - �,& k � -, 41" - "P�* ��"A,W% - , . �,*,,�, e.. :A_�- - - t_ ,,�._, - -Y'�` � � -, �- , -;, -- 1� 10'� s -_-� - -I' - t- - " " . L;o -, � '_.",6.�K�� fs - N A ,. , ,-;�, r ;k •_,"i 7 _ ,�'r .� -t, .'_ -,""I''4�- ,� . � I,=, "'., 'r....t";.)'� ....;!I ,_t - __ ,;�� •� �,� ,.`�4, ,. - 'k� . L _ - ,,, .-. J � -1--4- -, t, A ,ml_,, � ,-, ,%-A, , - . .1 - _ _,r , I . -,-:" .; ,;" -- . , - - J� ., � A �, -, *t; �.L'f '. - , . ' Z - , L r �,F �., ""' C':- _'.'�t -.- A ' '� - i ,�� .. , j .,J$, _,. ' . ' " - ' Y . � -;�, -4 't � . - - ", .. . ...'.��`f ".f % - -r t, I.. A, •:%•'•, . , , , " , t", � � .,I"'� _t, " _ ,?" � �.. , , ", , . , *t, ' . _.' _ I ., - �', , 't ." - . . _ _'_j,A,I*� .. _ I",_ 1� - . . * ; " ,;, -, . . I ,� , ,;:..."�-', �? - - -,. , -�4., I.- .;o .1-,,, �� i� -�,,,,Pl ",-; S , .t�,7-.! .. , " "';' , � ,,, I .. , .''.- `+"`:;. - " - �� . ,;. . 1. .: .. - -i, - - - 'I ., I I �p , �, , � I , � 17t . . 1% �' ' - ' ' r" . . '_; I ,.', I - � ` '; �' 1. ., � , , - ,� , -, , - .�, , "Vi '.. - -1 i�� - . � �� j,,. 4 '; , - - '� !.,.,,I ,�;, -, `X� -.�-,Pt7 �- ,_I,, -.; '14 ' -T. . 'V •- 4 jl�t 11 -- _j� - . - Il:. . _�_ il � - , ��e I %_ �I , .11 - , � , , A. - ` -, �4.Ai - , . . . ". .j �,I , " ..v .I ,,� ,- . _ �. p " �.*:_ , --4v , .,;: .,-- - O.. � - - A- ., A" - , ,-4 ' ' I ' It * '.-, , - �L _ L', I , "� ", ' -',' . . - .", " k . __ . _ j- `�'- " w X 't ,f " , _--O,Ar,l-, - -V -w -� - ,. --- -; - .�, - - � 1 -, , I _1 - . , , . A - '-, I" *t - it - , �,. --i", �,,�� '-..pi%,�-,��- - �.� I � � � � jl�' 1. .,4� e _ :� ", �J'. .�, . � - -, . - - .,� ,;); %I,ft " � , , •. I '. t.�11 �. -, , � �, - , S. �� vl - � � ,.' - � . , ,_ , . - -� , - k I .-' ` .11 �_. 4 17 1. , ;�. ,,-' --.*-, " , _- - - . S _ , ". "� , lr. - - - - , t,z. ;, !..?-.i., , - w ,.,-,. , �, 6 � �, I . - , " ;,. N, , ,A' j� � i .1�.111 _� I' - .." . , � , . - . � ,:� , , .'. , � - , - - . t, .11,17 v ;,. .�vL .." � .It, - �. Z, - ; -* ',",- � " L- , - '. � �. : - - � - - �1. . I i.; - r, -�,��, -.-, , " ,4_i e- .�� -, � , , I �, � _ ,, , � -.- �, , .' � I i � ., .. , _4 - - , " . -� ,tsdn�,"�� .., -iz 4LO ,,�- - '! " " , , , - � .1. -,. - � , J "I" , ��I "' .-.'-,rA " 4�, , - - p � .". L�� ' # It I � I � . ", , � i� . - . , .:, . i� 'I ) f 31 - �. lr,�, , -, I I , " f "'? ,,, '. r _�..' , - - V I ., ., 4� � ,�, � 4 . ! � � A,� - _ , "� 1 }, " I'li. ;�. - . . - , - 'k� - 4 r # - , , , _�, .... -1 -, - ' ., lf�, - :, � ,,. , "�, , I e, T -, , k .-.,.- --4.1- 4"- .. - - - .; , " - , . o- ,� 'V?��' A � - � " � ' . i ., p - ' 1(! '. " I- - 'Y' � � v '. ,,,,;,- - I � , ,� , 1� - , " _" , � .' 1tYL_,' - I.j� � . , "t"A;t . J � �j�, V, .q.- .;4�:�_ .. -, - � 11 - " � . ?; . c �. . � , I _ .1. 4 'J., .. " , " ?. , � L � I , , - � " , ". _ , , � - 1&�P�-.�I, ,�,--, !�` " ;- -'s" - .�,. '� '. ','- , ', ,�. j I _ ;C A .:; , . • at� , -1, , :F, r'� � 1. I le % '.-- •, _ , �,F , ,.'4 . , - , m ., . , • -1:. - . � , - , 1, V 4 iv � , I - , - ,, -4 -t- 4 '? ,,�* ,� 1,7 ` Z �j ,'& 5tk 1 _� , . � - _�j IL j_ -F-, . � • I I.I.i .. - ` - .�; " ., , Ii, ; . � l., 9 I � ". I � _� 1, , 1-,r-� - %� .? " IC - , 1, - • �-,I , :k, _- '� " , 1, - rte'`. � I ' .;".� ... '-,L I I . Lj:p - t, . . ,1_ I .. - . . ..I i,! , ��,," .1 - -- 4 - , ��A O ' �- ,-' 'A '. 1� , '_ L"' ' ' l I ', ,A� V . ': " _ , - � 'I - -1 -, � .v� - 1�L -,,, e, - - -. - � , ,;. -4,:�,,_ � �,' ,' , - " �1- N � �. , ;; ,.,,,I Z� � ,� , ' " � - .,� �_. . � - y - . I 4", f -` , I , ,_ m 1- 'A. i � " i", P . � j� . w - I -J.' .j.p., ,.I �, I - � " 1, 's, - . -� ., I., 1� '.'� _"�J-',�_. ' _�.. �'t '� ' ' - '_ � I'- , I t ' ,� '. �., i �vi . - .. - - � 'I�V�,'�Z , __ _ � ,, � - - 1, , , ;,Y� � I", .�', I .. - 1. .. - 4 1.�. - .11- � I., � i 11 ; - I I - I.". , j, - �i , � 4"4 I- ,�,� - , ;, ?1- t, r I - . " - J,,� -, -,_� --k W, ,0- '. 1- � 1� il'i V#%%... --A- -'-,, ,Z�,'O. - �- - . " .�L VI ` .11 W, I . - _. � I , � �; t �L , I - . �,., . - JL � , . �. -F •. . .,t � • - - - "i '. - , -�� . -*.T�kw:I'_- •. ., - -il41- .�x '-� --. 4� - - :, .. -. A . . .. , ' 11 ' .4 .,.;, z - f ., '. # � � .1 91 ?" "-- �, -S .,L ;� T !; .4 ��I. . , I ., 11 , I , j 1�,, ', k -A -, t , J4, � �,,�,�_ V - . 6" j ,I-' , , , � "i - , . � , ,_ _ I_ ,� ; 4 .-0' . , . ,?,J:fi -il, ., _�'. � .k ,;5 � , ,� ;-. %. - �: � . . � � i, - , - * � ,!,� .e. ii ,_ , _ i , . i-`,�- ""F-jr -4 -, , � �� , , * -* _�, - - _& . , ,� �t, �,--,.,�,�: '. - I ll .1 , 1. - •, � 1, . I— " . . N, .- �,I, -V , �� , � . ; " :i� .1 .- , -.1 , "I . _�, _ .;,, , �4 . - 11.1 . - � - f, . -, -*' _" :�, � - 1� v ; S� ljl�,..' g �0, .1 a , - V - - I I --" -�, - t: ,;, k . . •�., " - I,--- Y, .'�, . " . , , f, I - _"_:�' , ., , . " �'- I , - -;, .-Lt.. ,r;r . - ., •, - � , - . , � � .. , I , I Ts. -,, � � . � 'e. ., _ , !� � T*. "41 -A'I __ � _' - '� , ,,, .v-;- - . . , " . . . , ,� 't 's'-.+. - � � �., , , %, �. �f - :� ". . , _,' I " �, ,l�, . ,i?, -, , .' _ L . � .- ,F - � , - - ., ? . j 0 - _W� - - ,,, ;, - , . �0, 'I. - ; -4. - I " �A.-.� �'s .. A- , - -- K -�, '1� l ^ �' ,V,,. -4;�, , , - - -, Jt f , _ - Ly� .;�. z ., ;, , J; , ,,�� 'I, '' I . A, , ,, , ,& ,�,, ,�, -, , ,Q!t. i ��_ i " - - . .1-i ,� - I �� - " - . i � - z. 4 ;I . A � - (�, A �. , , , 1'�' I . "", �_16,0�"k �'nr,'�,-, - - -'L 1 , A� 1. k, ,;I- 77, -,,, "v,',;�- ,4, � . A t.�2 " - I �e ", N", - !:%,� ;, � - � 4 � 4 z ,, �, I, -1 I - i- I - 1. LW4 'j. 4y % . il, 'I - ,-. -, , ,� .. ., I V . .' I'A - '-'-' - - �# I v -i , , ','Vh , - ;l', .� V 4��- -, 37 16. . ,�_ ' _" . - ; �j , �t_ -1. ' - �L_ -1 ..,$'I -4- -, ;, � , �._T. , _�Vl � .I V. V , . !;, Lj_,4'_ ,L I ' j-_ * .. " j, - - _ .'I- , A --I- Il " � -1 % , � ' L�, , �:�I' j - ' - ' � - ' 1, I.. . I .. ; �1. ,:, " �?�� - , , , N " 'r. .4- - ., ,,_ I �.� , ',,��_ L - . , I . ,r, _,'_, , ,,, '' L -10 71 ". jL I - I � - :•„' . I 'F _ - , .4. 't 1, �_ _ .-�pi , * I I � . '. , .4' � - Y" , . -, , - • `.� � 'j; - I i � "�_ .P. 1. i .. " �'_ 1 4 -.- .,.,.-- "': '] . ... I e- I -1 - - .. . � ;.- . -, � W, - . .1- 4�,, � ,,, - ,,, ,� .-,Vl ;, 't' :_1�4 - A I I , , 1'. , I , " s . :,. ; . ' - -1. ,;� I ,. . _� 4 .., -,t � A `;�,,� - - ( , I L-- . L � - I . ., - I . 1- _ ,L'. - `� 4 , - I 'I? .�' 11 ��; . . i . 't , n-, ', �4 ' ' ;L ,., � ;1- , . '_ r 1� , . - ._� �,,,, .V�. - - - 4'r, , 7, t_ kj � ,1,1; , 1� ,� ,q - ; � !,�� 'r 4 4 1 .1 - , L, , t__ - j - - I - -1. 'I',, �I __ , , �� , Ii. 1 $ , � _., " ,,, t�',., - . l, ., - I I 11 _1 __ , �kv �,',,,i, �q�iv ��, . - 1 � �, .., , , , - il, ., A,ll , , , m '-, f�r �,"� -�. _*1 ." • .. " - ii `411 h * 1 ", Rn" � A"** I* ", - 0* I , I -,, MI-0 to"Ovo �41�_:.� I q t . , , w .. �"Or "I I I v - , , I t�14'4 .k ,,, , - �;_� r _;Lj_ �4� , , ,,,-� -,_,; __; - � P!-'- , --k, - --.t. - __ , , .'.t�rtj, . ', k' V �. -'I -- ��; - .,l, - , - 1, �.. - � , ', %-11 t" -.14 , - j � , '.." � , - ,,,,% - , .1 41c_.11.11�_, , . ,S,r ,4,�, ,,� ,,.,�J,,�,��,.M_ - I- 'A', 4 ill � � - �11 '�:"-,!.,!-,A-.,�-;�.,�-,-,..,�'. .$* .-,� " " I �c , .,- kt 'P, -e�- ,-.7, J��. '4 ,i�I'r, ._! 4 . ,;'A-,i,AI "--"--- % e. - ,,, ,-� V . . _ _4 .. - a: - J� � - I ,� ? -,.,]o , i �. - - � IL 'S' ,O ,,, A q - . .�, _�T4'��, "_ __-i� I _". " % � - - .I I " � :* ..; �_`l - -,4 �k,-- r ""P...""p"� . ... .. 4. , .�, 1 4 .. 'X. , , - �-- �A 'q� I - -.,. ,-". t .L%, ,� .. � �,_. . ". ,�,. -41 - 1 _ , - � , t, . , - �, I _'. • - �w,l.- , �P-_I_ . re, '. � _�, , 'k- _ ,-, ,-,,_r" .,., !, _ , '. _i,, 4,," -�Y. ;.fm _%-i_,�',.; � - " � V - .,�,j -,.: I. _�' I .. .1 - _ - , _ W_ f -.�-, " , - , .. - ...l-, , 1�- � I - � 1, �.., i4 , I � t:11 � 11 - , LI ___ - , - I I '" I - , , -1 11 I , --,r,." . !L � - I , .�� -, i - - -, . , . ". r� '. 1 - , -, I " - , I- - .. W. - -. 4 - - - �,).. �. - ,,, - .� I ',� - , 1, • ` .� •�i. . ,� - �t -,, .- , " " - -,- � 4,- �,,, I " . . Z,t,� , _ 7 J� j.� ;. , _ ,� " i -_ F - Ii P�'q ,,,,,i,- �o,-'I�-�"- - � � .;,. - "; � I . , . . � L 4 - � I ,i_ , - , ., -1 't I ,Z,." � , , . % . � . . - 1 , 7, I . � , zl�' . , - !L: - I - - �Aq'10�5-. 9 ,,.,, ��,- � 1 ..�_ �t I ._. - � � 4 Z,I, .! *!,-,A, -, . _ I � " .?- - - _-+•''1•y - . " I V I- I __ � I- t, .. - ko � �, ., � .,�. . _�I*T 1, 'I -1 _�-, _�., - .1 I , �F, _,_,_,� - 1-1 - - .. . ,_ , �. .1--!�-.4ll; - 't;.,; , . , � - - , I . � , , . ,_ . . ,�! � � . . , ,� � _.� - . - 4 , - '. . , , '. , . ,� . � . - .�_, , N - •" - . . 1, _ � , , , _� _ � , , . , � - .�, A . ., - - .4 , � I . .� - '. . - - ., . , � . -, , -1 ., , . "'o, r 1:�. 1, � i �, .,J`~ , . , � , , 4, w1 r I � , . � � , , . � ',� , , , � � , �. , , , , , . I . - I , ! - � - . � '41 � , , ,, - , 4� - . � L , � ,,,� , - ,�_ z , , , ,:� .',4 .;;.t v - , ' . - . •-:�., 4 . ; , � , . - . , � , - �� . - - " , - .v . _!�;-, � . - , - - ,-. � •; ,�7_ � , . ,� , , � !, �_ , ,_ , '. , .4 . ,� . ,� - , - � . , �,,F - , , � . '. � � . � , ; , . L " - , � e . - . ; __ .0 , I - - ( � � , � � . �� , � , , � . . _� � - i % - ; , � � . �. . _� . - � , _ �, , _.� , , , , , " . L , , - - . � ., , �, , ,�;, � � I -, - � , , . ,�r , . , , , 4, , , , . - � - e � �, * . , , . . , , - - ' +!'•a., .N I? � - � - , � , - . '. i � - - - . . .. . . � . , , , ) . �4tk . x .__ � , � - � , � , - , , � - . ", , L - � , .; , , - , ., - , - .-, -I-, ". I . . . 4 . " - . L I , . -, -, . - , " , . ,� , , . " * � . , � t�� , , � � I . ,, ., . � - , r- *:,%:�qp , �', . � t, - , ., . " , � , - " , " � � � , - � � � � . 04� " , , - , , , , � - - , , , .'`t^ � - 1. " �, I � , . . � ., . , , '. �: - , , - - - - .� - , , � , , � , . , Nf � # _T� - - . , ., , ,�� _� � . -1 . � . - 4v- , , , � , �, � , - . , , , , - � � . e � 0 ,, �, � , � , .i.,,7 --} � � � . f � , �� , � , � ,� , � - � .. _ , � ., �', . - � � � _. . - - - . , ". � - - � ;�- ,. � , , . •, � '. ,�r,� -I-, - ,-, . , - - - _.� " , " . , , ,� " 't. Y_ _;� " -, 'o i,:' 1. - W, 11 4- TI I.,. , , .� -, , , . , . , - .. ; - . � - 1. I wl,' , i I � � - . t. - -, - " , . . , . �, � - . i . ,__ _ � �� _� . � - - _ - - , �4 - ., NOTICE- OF_ H kRIXG ON REDEVELOPMENT PLAN �' .'^ -AND HEDEvaoPMENT PROJECT THEEEEYjR0POSED" NOTICE HEREBY., IS GIVEN i Pursuant -to that certain. Resolution of the, Council 6: the City of Saint Paul, Counoil. Pile ``No 21-4615, 6pprood September: i0,: 1963, 'that a -publio hearing �r Ill be held bq and 'betare the `COuna� l `pf the City of Sa3.nt. Paul;. in ,the Counoil* Chambers,,- 1u the .City Hall, r ` and Court House, at tue City of 5a3ut paulr, State" Of . .: „I nneQOtaI - on the 24th day of Soptembor,- ;,19631- at 10#60 ; j o1o1©ok A. H',- upon the. Hedevelb meet- Plan designatedi . "BQdevelopment plan , for Cathedral Area 'Urban Aeneaa1 ProJeat; ' Mien,' $,25; doted •Augu�it, -1903" } oia. the 6t d i ' of, September; J r 19.63; _filed th the City Clerk of the City of Saint Paul, .- and presented to ,90 td _ Courioi7 by Housi i and Redevelopment Authority of the City, .of Saint Paulo , Minnesota, with the , appli4 dtion acid Houeibg'ad Redevelopment Authority of ± f the City' ,of -!Ssio Pau -ct Minneoote for said C a ' r : ounoil'a approval . 1 r ,,,. et. �t of - 'a Rei eVe�.opmerit_ =Piss and the Reds elopment Prp jdot v. T ; thereby ; pz�opdBedj. tqr ,that oerte in area within- the' C it ' . ' o ` � Saint Pau, •Count y of - Hamsey� State ''off Minnesota;,, aommQnly , 'designated as. Cathedral Area! 'desdribed"' as follows•s .. .. "Beginning at the point. of iuteraeation 'of the ` southaft right -*of sway line of .Cari�4Z1 Avenue. with the western right�_of -way line. of Cathedral `Place then southerly along paid line 'of• Cathedral * Place a to= the ,point of .intersection- with -thee southern right- of*ifag Uno of M04hail :Avenue, 'then west= or-,ly' along. Said line °to ,ths point of jiltor,eat'i�in . r with the' eastern line -of - Arundel..S, eat, .f ,. than northerly slang saic! line to iris 'point. o#' In-Iter'.- • a.eetion with the' •northern right�of -'gay - line of -Marshall }... y Avenue., then - westerly, . along said line to the point of '< interoeat-ion With the western r:ht- -.wa line' of �' Arundel Stroet,.then °northerly along said..11 -de to the.' point of intersedtion with the,'southern' right- of:�way line of the alley between Rondo. end .Carroll Avenuee., then eaeterly,along se.id- .alley sine 263037$ feet to ;the point of intereeotion with a 1ot -line that aouth.. ; _ erly along, said lot' line =to the paint. of, Interee0tion r '� • witY�, the southern right -of -wag ".line -,ref Carroll, Avenue ` tho me. ea- tarty along Said line to the point aP inter- .a oeotion with the western ri,ghtl- o�';.way i iris Of Cathedral Place whi�ah 19 `tbe'Point of . beginni�ig.." - - '• ` .WT • • ` • - Li'•- • '' .., •y .,' f • `.- r.a . . - 11 f✓ ' r . , ` -r -. ',.f {•'' • - A' •, , - t. _ • -. ,Rhit, -aaldS ii� �ve�OpM W 'y'e ■` A. SIT fj]' 0 •6 -� praorited° trageth�e9r tjth3a i�tatemaz�t -a',the ''echo pz'bpoe ®d for- the , f t ' of `� ', sups RedoVelOppolit ? n ect .and the ` t ritteh i . is h eoi3 zed approval, ,. of th6 iame by the • -plai'illi • Foam of said. q. iy. lof Saint Paul a�d l 000 peritfnent r ; ., - eat =e� aai+i 8,�deveiq sment Plah -and maps;. 'oharts.,aud Qt4ata Astor s. `of: thoV same boil on. f 1n iri the �s fi ©e of .'said My" _ .the off tge ,of a$;*d Ro ing a.nd`"Redev ioputent. a. t Authority of the city:of,Saint' Paa]:�' M nneB4ter su`b 8Ct t0 _ iweOtlol% du rlrtg rogul bt�a.inegi�" hours, the tame, by ra er-► f. ` ..enoei, . - iisrsby .srd inv�rporgt.ed horain and. madeAart-Iarid paroal ,.T h r� ot. 1t tY es ca14a intent, pt� abso and e ' ec t .aa ', said ddaumonts and all of "tote Nome W. r, full sit foi t i' tare r hhat Up4t eai�t polie` hbaritw axis Win :tire of :the pttrpbse" .- of -the 8ame U:a CdUndt .- .skull ocnoidO' said. RadevelopmQnt Platt, for satd Ca�thadra�. -Ar ®e .aid sa�:d Re�laro'elpot�i�nt FrQjeat .; • _ ' • _ •. - - , - , z . these " by: proposed aid rt,. emcpng" gther. _goo, detbr_ zt "!O, whether r or- 4# _ th o, until a .8e elution theregt`,to be -aaxisidered a t • ; .. -ohpli l . a.dopted.. aporov sad Eecl veXdpmeat aPlatid and sa id - r RdevecpmQnt?zdeo.artd permittin :saidoui3; ani� .Ee:� . -_ deveiopmeot ,Autxorit :of the. of s4�nt $aillinue t , to undortako ztt-B urban renet(al project :ndbr Su te .'.and, local ' laW,,*1th Tied - raj. fti de ��te�ej.etaace� urid�r' T tYa l .of, the ;, ,:• - HO SiOg"Apt, "1949' . -ao Amendod l to' acquire, lsiid. �p the pry jeot _ - = Area ; to d6� 011sh or z emove itu ldin a '.aiad improvomot�t to , 0; strudt. orr'rieo9natruc�t. atra+st i ntiiitiea a st �pr'a+ ' I Ygrrrouhda O d:- vtho;r 'pro jolt imprciYame�ite and � ©' make. �.aud �rraila`. 10 foxy di3ve loptoe nt -ate cede elo cqe t ii�",'.P ii at writer►. .. - pr.ieo or boo. �o' r,Qfit an a a� g a s., tutl�ored ` bit iainc p' axed - that, ,am g, , n ao ov ii xf with' Mid by said Ilk " i _ -� . _ .. •� ,fir IIW. - n • _ -, ate: a . itiori; to ae3 �vona .de r d e eel .Pub1 .0 hes�ring" tie :. sound it Will ditetwit'e sod . zaako find rtgg _ aOOordt.II$Iy upon the que�ct t.oTip wh the '` .4r tot (1) a the f j;tgu ial aid to be ; provIded;.t `tYxe -,oc aot i noceiiser U 8 e 1 the project � v a on, In aa*v dance with tie: Aedeve��:cip�ent pled; ,(2),'tbe� , ,f •'Atdevei . ,p_ .nt,.� Ift. Will affi-d Z o _ ppa. ^tun• ity, coneieta � t_ vitY t e .O ound. ne® d th o: Tjo ality a n e o : A f6r .too relab.tt.te fir= reQ4v elcrpinen o the "trbart reaeei, j aroi 'by p #tat+ BOdeeigpiaertt 'Plea conforms- ' to .4 Si,4erOI_- plan "O . thc� d$ i'gpment of the 1b a7. ty e .- (4) tie, ,8sd -6v, olbpi a FYaxa ` g .a_ . clue ` i�otip do ret i t tq tl e prcavlsIon of . *d c late± park 'ate re 'rarOaticmaI 'arses and be jdeai dab .e r - tisi kibn doh' � g v ease ►t, r with npoaial. c onkid,ergtloh for the health} 'pto ty, acid wolfare C! ' A4 or-on x'8 40g. :in th$ gl�XlQX'8�: Y.34 Y1 � of the site oovered. by the PIan; - thaf, , -the port ltie tt -rolopation prpopm of Said s . '_ I#cueing, Maid `aedevezloiteri Atthoritr o€• the-,C# Saint Pain.'; tanedeta as door l"tod-. b�r oOL d huthgrti is." On& shall area• - ` . M6 .4 fi, ed Send avpilable Pori public exar 4 . ►tidu; !dt -the said orh ,* of .ea :d Ci , Clerk; !n id City ,I3a3I rd4d'COtxr Foudes = _' °-and - at..0e�id, •offiae._tif eeid-Hdu ius and - 1,6d e P610 --me- Authortt� w.: of thy. Cx,t• of .Saint - Pain,, i�rineao'te,, nn4 ehe1.'be. aubeat tp • canidesrat.cn 4an .iiecnaaioa }at , sld`ublia bearixag , and that fi a .i ' endonn, partMpt h3pe, ao n` d o raza . g ion n terefited sir 46,noorne.d .in "U. 'wattero or 'any or the ::same, prov� e� 1, _n ikfi i veid,,, to be 'wsde 'th&.")S JOO ot'. said publ a -Sho i p • '•YT� heh eon e ` F�Op?i �NiV - - , nt ;a�iid publ e. ieyar :n '. bef- Ora''said Cannail, ;' = City C erk o ,0 3a nt Pau. . 1�� Dated Septem?�r Housing • and Redevelopment Anthoxity OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Pay ON RX * John Pi. I E"'+mr 9x, ti 011imx Is elvbat A2 Ibnewith slecesu -Ty 'dovMvitation La tc"x &r-ca td-th tho 131'ban 11'enewaa a:ut.la Part 41 chapta -2¢ soctivi It which to tits t6 -t I �.ut"'On of the � �I~�I«I�n Ir�;� z,�� tiar��.t,� A'tt&r'b0d here at the 1 *1110 AISIc t �� as Is T S, q yy q p } o h s•* g # lid � h X �ai�+a Urbao u i5 1 ,Y ?1'an (tic -do for 944w3* ea od may it 1 ) ; Two (2) corloo *f t4 Routo APPtx714' al A 2!katabill'tY Study c &' 11x01 iivca vxba T-em*1 f1rol ct Bch .mss pap4x ad fox the "Wo'Vri ty by J.. 46 4 Vb- 40442mot of tho tnc'tlk Perfamuti 17Y Olt .3 r�k art €!lcr r; (1) OnVtlapo 0ch of tba fotiotdng etddbltt¢ fox ..4,, uxv -&Y r-at.e. Gboko on } Vocational � "ssb 'avow) r - May log' , for- �u4lio �Wvsltyq Q t4 A 2 v for uOil Mc�r, time s"M'�ttod a4 if Fliv It n4cw-soaly Introductory Note This Final Project Report, Part I, is the first of three projects to be submitted as part of the Cathedral Area General Neighborhood Renewal Plan (GNRP), Minnesota R -17 (GN). Its submission coincides with the submission of the Final Project Report, Part I of the GNRP; both of which were prepared simultaneously to achieve total community treatment, reasonable protection against blighting influences, an abbreviated survey and planning period necessary for meeting immediate city objectives and desirable planning goals. Although prepared simultaneously, this submission is self contained and all data in the text, maps, forms and documents are justified in their own right as well as within the context of the General Neighborhood Renewal Plan. 0 0 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA FINAL PROJECT REPORT CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 May 1, 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS Code No. Title R 201 Application for Loan and Grant, Form H -612 R 202 Labor Standards R 203 Pi--aject Photographs R 211 Community Requirements Data R 212 Project Area Report R 213 Urban Renewal Plan (Separately Bound) R 214 Report on Planning Proposals i R 215 Report on Minority Group Considerations R 221 Conservation Data or Reconditioning Data R 222 Land Acquisition Report R 223 Relocation Report R 224 Project Improvements Report R 225 Land Disposal Report R 226 Cost Estimate and Financing Report (1) Project Cost Estimate and Financing Plan, Form H -6200 (2) Statements in support of estimates of non - cash local grant -in -aid (3) Data in support of proposed sharing of net project cost and sources of funds for project expenditures and relocation payments (4) Project Expenditures Budget, Form H -6220 (5) Local Public Agency Staffing and Salary Schedule, Form H -630 (6) Data Supporting Project Expenditures Budget, Form H -6121 (7) Project on a three - fourths grant basis R 231 Legal Data (1) Resolution of applicant authorizing filing of appl ication Code No. TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) R 231 Legal Data (cont.) Title (2) Opinion of Local Public Agency respecting Part I of application (3) Opinion of Local Public Agency Counsel re- specting Urban Renewal Plain (4) Text of proposed notice of public hearing on the project and statement concerning its publication or posting (5) Citation of law which requires payments in I ieu of taxes or ad valorem taxes on Local Public Agency acquired property (b) Rent supplementation program financed by municipality or another public body MAPS Map No. Map Title 1 Boundary 2 Proposed Land Use 3 Proposed Rights -of -Way 4 Acquisition Map 5 Proposed Zoning 6 Existing Land Use 7 Existing Zoning 8 Existing Rights -of -Way 9 Existing Combination Sanitary and Storm Sewer System 10 Proposed Sanitary Sewer System 11 Proposed Storm Sewer System 12 Existing Water System 13 Proposed Water System 14 Existing Electricity 15 Proposed Street Lighting 16 Existing Gas 17 Existing Telephone 18 Structure Condition 19 Blighting Influences 20 Disposition 21 Illustrative Site Plan • FIGURES Figure Number Figure Title 1 Marshall Street Cross - Section • 2 Boundaries of Storm Water Drainage Areas 3 Service Area of Public Open Space 4 Proposed Traffic System 5 Summit -Dale Community 6 View of Proposed Technical - Vocational High School 7 Typical Middle- Income Relocation Housing 8 Sequence of Relocation 9 Aerial View • • EXHIBITS Exhibit Exhibit Title A Survey Data Sheets B City of St. Paul, Minnesota Department of Public Works, Specifications for Street and Sewer Construction C Proposed Plan For Thoroughfares, City Planning Board of St. Paul, Minnesota D Preliminary Schematic Site Plan -- Technical- Vocational High School E Preliminary Engineering Drawing, Interstate 94 F Preliminary Utilities Plan, G Minnesota State Act Against Discrimination, H Tenant Selection and Re- examination Manual • • Form H -612, (Application For Loan And Grant) is attached. Form approved Budget Bureau No. 63- R610.8' H-612 (Over) PROJECT LOCALITY HOUSING AND HOME FINANCE AGENCY SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA URBAN RENEWAL ADMINISTRATION PROJECT NAME-. CATHEDRAL AREA APPLICATION FOR LOAN AND GRANT PROJECT NUMBER (Slum Clearance and Urban Renewal Program) MINN. R -25 DATE RECEIVED (To be filled in by HHFA) INSTRUCTIONS: Prepare original and 4 conformed copies for HHFA. Place original in Binder No. 1, copies in Binders No. 2, 3, 4, and 5. A. CORPORATE NAME OF APPLICANT HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF.SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA B. TYPE OF APPLICATION [X] Temporary Loan and /or Capital Grant, for project execution [Complete all blocks] [ ] Temporary Loan, for early land acquisition [Leave Blocks D and E blank]' ' C. SUBMISSION [X] Initial application [ ] Revision of previously approved application dated 19` , for purpose of: [ ] Change in project area boundaries [ ] Revision in Project Capital Grant Revision in Temporary Loan [ ] Revision in Relocation Grant [] ] Other (Explain) D. REPAYMENT OF ADVANCES Upon undertaking this project, the Applicant will repay,-with interest, Title I• advances in the sums indicated and in accordance with the contracts shown below: ADVANCE CONTRACT NUMBER AMOUNT OF CONTRACT AMOUNT ADVANCED UNDER CONTRACT R — 25 $ 1382000• $ s s E. EXISTING FEDERAL AUTHORIZATIONS Estimated survey and planning costs for this project, in accordance with the most recent approved Survey and Planning Budget No. 1 approved by HHFA on 4 -9 —" 19.j3: $ 1380000 ` F. TYPE AND AMOUNT OF FUNDS BEING APPLIED FOR COMPLETE ONLY IF REVISION TYPE (Check applicable items) TOTAL AMOUNT - AMOIJN OF H NGE (i� or —S [X] TEMPORARY IRAN $ 3 6 0 0 3 9 2 - c )$ [X] PROJECT CAPITAL GRANT [�(] 2/3 3/4 Basis: $ ( ) $ Basis [ ] Limited project costs ] Municipality under 50,000 population [ Municipality under 150,000 in redevelopment area 2 , 2 59 �, 3,05 LY1 RELOCATION GRANT $ . 4 1 1 O (.. ) $ G. PROGRAM the-Housing CX] Title toedatesing Act of 1949, Title [ °] ir toothehHousing Act of 195449, as amended (Over) PROJECT AREA BOUNDARIES Boundary Description -- The description of subject Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project, Minnesota R -25, is as follows: A tract of land situated in the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the southern right -of -way line of Carroll Avenue with the western right -of -way line of Cathedral Place, then southerly along said line of Cathedral Place to the point of intersection with the southern right -of -way line of Marshall Avenue, then westerly along said line to the point of intersection with the easterly right -of way line of Arundel Street, then northerly along said line to the point of intersection with the northern right -of -way line of Marshall Avenue, then westerly along said line to the point of intersection with the western right- of -way line of Arundel Street, then northerly along the said line to the point of intersection with the southerly right -of -way Wi e.of the;al•ley,:(or.extension) thereof where no alley exists) between Rondo and Carroll Avenues; then easterly along said alley line 263.375' to the point of intersection with a lot line, then southerly along said lot line to the point of intersection with the southern right -of -way line of Carroll Avenue, then easterly along said I ine to the point of intersection with the western right -of -way I ine of Cathedral Place which is the point of beginning. U Previously Obtained and Approved • C7 PROJECT AREA REPORT 1 . Boundary revisions. • There are no project boundary revisions from those shown in the Survey and Planning Application. 2. Project area maps. Maps of the project area and immediately surrounding area showing: a. Boundaries of project area (See Map ;No. 1, Boundary Map). b. Boundaries of clearance sections (See Map No. 1, Boundary Map). c. Number of buildings with deficiencies within each block (See Map No. 18, Structure Condition). The deficient buildings, reflected on the above noted map, include one or all of the following building deficiencies: 1) defects to a point warranting clearance, 2); deteriorating condition because of a defect not correctable by normal maintenance, 3) extensive minor defects which, when taken collectively, cause the building to have a deteriorating effect on the surrounding area, 4) inadequate original construction, and 5) inadequate or unsafe plumbing, heating, or electrical facilities. d. Approximate property lines and outline of each building (See Map No. 6, Existing Land Use). e. Existing land use of each property, including designation of: 1) land in public use, identifying each type of public use, 2) each property within project area in mixed use, and pre- dominant use of each such property, and 3) each vacant parcel within project area determined to be • residential in character, (See Map No. 6, Existing Land c Use). 3. Project area data. a. Form H -6120, Summary of Project Data, is attached. b. Basis for data reported on Project Area Data portion of Form H -6120: 1) Criteria developed and the items utilized in classifying buildings as deficient. The material in this section and that reported on a portion of Form H -6120, Project Area Data, was derived from a field survey undertaken during December, 1962. Three criteria were used to determine the number of buildings with deficiencies. First, a building was considered deficient if it was dilapidated to a point where it no longer provided adequate shelter or endangered the safety of the occupants. Second, a building was considered deficient if it had major defects (outlined below) which classified the building as substandard. And third, a building was considered deficient if it had major or intermediate defects (outlined below) which, in combination, caused the building to be classified as deteriorating or deteriorated, although not necessarily substandard. (Note: The field survey and building classification were modeled after the criteria outlined in the I Enumerator's Reference Manual for the 1960 Census of Housing.) Major defects, which can only be remedied by extensive repair, i were found in: outside walls, roof, foundation, windows and frames, doors and frames, and extensive unrepaired damage from storm or , fire. Major defects consisted of the following items: considerable areas of missing materials, large cracks, sags and bulges, and other indications of serious structural faults. -2- • Page 1 of 6 Form approved Budget Bureau No. 68- R884.4 • If-6120 (3-61) PROJECT LOCALITY HOUSING AND HOME FINANCE AGENCY ST B 1 MIE PROJECT NAME URBAN RENEWAL ADMINISTRATION CATHEDRAL AREA PROJECT NUMBER SUMMARY OF PROJECT DATA MINN. R-25 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IN WHICH (Urban Renewal Program) PROJECT AREA IS SITUATED Fourth INSTRUCTIONS: Place original and 2 copies in Binder No. 1, and one copy each in other binders. A. CATEGORY OF PROJECT ELIGIBILITY (Check one; see Urban Renewal Manual, Chapter 3 -2) CATEGORY PRESENT CHARACTER OF AREA EXTENT OF PRESENT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED REUSE I Predominantly. residential Built up Any ElII Predominantly residential Predominantly open land Any ElIII Not predominantly residential Built up Predominantly residential ElIV Not predominantly residential Predominantly open land Predominantly residential Nonresidential El V Exception Not predominantly residential Built up Not predominantly residential C 11 VI Nonresidential Exception Not p redominantl y residential Predominantly open land Not predominantly residential El VII College, University, or Hospital Any Built up Any El VIII College, University, or Hospital Any Predominantly open land Any CI Lx - Open land Predominantly residential CI R - Open land Not predominantly residential Area Redevelopment C 11 AI Exception Not predominantly residential Built up Not predominantly residential C11 %II ArExceptionlopment Not predominantly residential Predominantly open land Not predominantly residential CI B. TYPE OF TREATMENT OF AREA AREA ONLY (Complete Blocks C. F, and C) rjCLEARANCE CONSERVATION AREA ONLY (Complete Blocks C, H, and I) C I COWINATION OF CLEARANCE AND CONSERVATION SECTIONS (Complete Blocks C through I) C I RECONDITIONING AREA ONLY (Complete Blocks C, N, and I) SUBMITTED BY: Date Signature Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota Local Public Agency Title Page 2 of 5 • �3_61� C. ENVIRONMENTAL DEFICIENCIES (Check and complete one) No change in descriptions given on Form H-6101, Urban Renewal Area Data, Block J, submitted for this project on Februg= 1-L 19-6a- (See Text for sane) See following descriptions DESCRIPTION OF EXTENT TO WHICH CONDITION EXISTS CONDITION (Give source of information. If additional space is required, continue on a plain sheet and attach to this form) 1. Overcrowding or improper location of structures on the land 2. Excessive dwelling unit density S. Conversions to incompatible types of uses, such as roominghouses among family dwellings 4. Obsolete building types, such as large residences or other buildings which through lack of use or maintenance have a blighting influence 6. Detrimental land uses or conditions, such as incompatible uses, structures in mixed use, or adverse influences from noise, smoke, or fumes 6. Unsafe, congested, poorly designed, or otherwise deficient streets 7. Inadequate public utilities or community facilities contributing to unsatisfactory living conditions or economic decline S. Other equally significant environmental deficiencies • Page 8 of 6 • H -6120 (3-61) DATA ON PROJECT AREA (Cgaplete• this page only if project area includes both clearance and conservation sections) D. PRESENT CHARACTER, CONDITION OF BUILDINGS, AND PROPOSED LAND USES Does Not Apply (Areas shall be shorn to nearest tenth of an acre. Total area within perimeter boundaries of the project shall be ac- counted for, excepting only any sizable interior areas which have been excluded from the project area. Meanings of terms are identical with those in Urban Renewal Manual, Ch. 3 -2, and criteria for "Building Deficiencies" in Ch.3 -1) ACREAGE CONDITION OF BUILDINGS ACREAGE BY PRESENT CHARACTER BY PROPOSED IMPROVED ACQUISITION BY ITEM TOTAL NUMBER PROPOSED WITH W /OTHER UNIM— NOT TOTAL WITH LAND USES BLDGS. OR IMPROVE— PROVED ACQUIRED TO BE BUILDINGS DEFI- STREETS MENTS ACQUIRED CIENCIES TOTAL 1. Streets, Alleys, Public ................... ................... ....... ............................... ....... ............................... Rights -of -Way, Total ....... ............................... a. Major Transportation ................... ...... ............................... ...• :ti: ............ (1 ) W ith Federal ral .................................... ............. .. ......... ................. ........... . ............................................................. . Highway Aid 2 Without Federal ........ ................... .......... .................. ............................... ................... ..................... ............................... ............::................. :::::. ::.:.:......... ::.............. Highway Aid .................. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.................. b. Other Streets, Alleys, .................. .... ............................... Public Rights -of -Way .................. ................ .................. 2. Residential, Total a. Dwelling Purposes b. Related Public or Semipublic Purposes 8. Nonresidential, Total a. Commercial b. Industrial c. Public or Semipublic (Institutional) d. Open or Unimproved ....... ............................... ............. ........................ .......................... ............................... ............................... Land Not Included in ....... ............................... .......................... ............................... 8a, b, or c above ...... E. CONTEMPLATED TREATMENT Does Not A ply NUMBER NUMBER TO BE NUMBER ITEM TOTAL NUMBER NUMBER TO BE DESIGNATED FOR RETAINED FOR WHICH CLEARED CONSERVATION OR WITHOUT TREATMENT NOT RECONDITIONING TREATMENT YET DETERMINED 1. Area (in Acres) of Parcels With Buildings 2. All Buildings a. Residential Buildings b. Nonresidential Buildings 8. All Dwelling Units a. In Buildings With Deficiencies b. In Standard Buildings Page 4 of 6 H -6120 (3 -61) 'See Attached Sheet DATA ON CLEARANCE AREA, OR CLEARANCE SECTIONS OF PROJECT AREA F. PRESENT CHARACTER, CONDITION OF BUILDINGS, AND PROPOSED LAND USES (Areas shall be shorn to nearest tenth of an acre. Meanings of terms are identical with those in Urban Renewal Manual, Chapter 3 -2, and criteria for "Building Deficiencies" in Chapter 3 -1) ACREAGE CONDITION OF BUILDINGS BY PRESENT CHARACTER BY PROPOSED NUMBER ACREAGE IMPROVED ITEM ACQUISITION TOTAL NUMBER WITH SUB- BY WITH WIOTHER TO BE NOT TO TOTAL UNIM- BUILDINGS DEFT- STANDARD WARRANTING PROPOSED LAND USES B'LOGS.OR IMPROVE- PROVED C_ BE AC- CIENCIES CLEARANCE STREETS MENTS QA QUIRED QUIRED TOTAL 49.5 0.2 9.3 38.4 1. Streets, Alleys, Public # .......... ............................... ...................::::::: ............................ Rights-of-Way, Total 14.5 9.1 ................. 6 $ a. Ivhjor Transportation ................. ;:: ................. .......... .......................... .......................... ............................... ............................... ............................... 1 With Federal ................ ............................... ::::::: :..............::.............. Highway Aid ............... ................ ............................... ............................ ............... ................ ........................... ............................... .......................... (2) Without Federal ............... ............... . ............................... ................ ................ ................ ........................... ..... ........................... ................................................................ ...::::::::...... ............................................ ............................... : : : : : :........ ... ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ................... . .......... Highway Aid 8 Y .................................................................................. ., b. Other Streets,Alleys, Public Rights -of -Way 14.5 901 5.4 # 6.$ 2. Residential, Total 34.9 31.0 - 3.9 31.5 3.4 2 6$ a. Dwelling Purposes 31.6 27.7 - 309 31-3 * 0. 236 312 6$ b. Related Public or Semipublic Purposes 3.3 3.3 - - 0.2 3.1 3 0 0 29.8 8. Nonresidential, Total 001 0.1 0.1 1 1 a, Commercial 0.1 0.1 - - 0.1 1 b. Industrial c. Public or Semipublic (Institutional) -- - - - - d. Ope n or Unimproved ::i La nd Not Included i n - - - - 3a, b, or Q. CONTEMPLATED TREATMENT NUMBER NUMBER TO BE NUMBER ITEM TOTAL NUMBER NUMBER TO BE CLEARED DESIGNATED FOR CONSERVATION OR RETAINED WITHOUT FOR WHICH TREATMENT NOT RECONDITIONING- TREATMENT YET DETERMINED 1. Area (in Acres) of Parcels With Buildings 30.93 27.57 3.36 - 2. All Buildings 240 236 .. a. Residential Buildin Including 239 235 4 b. Nonresidential Buildings 1 1 - 0 .8. All Dwelling Units 574 543 31 a. In Buildings With Deficiencies 291 291 0 b. In Standard Buildings 2$3 252 31 - 'See Attached Sheet • C Page 6 of 6 H -6120 (9-61) DATA ON CONSERVATION OR RECONDITIONING AREA, OR CONSERVATION SECTIONS OF PROJECT AREA H. PRESENT CHARACTER, CONDITION OF BUILDINGS, AND PROPOSED LAND USES Does Not Apply (Areas shall be shorn to nearest tenth of an acre. Meanings of terns are identical with those in Urban Renewal Manual, Chapter 3 -2, and criteria for "Building Deficiencies" in Chapter 3 -1) ACREAGE CONDITION OF BUILDINGS BY PRESENT CHARACTER I BY PROPOSED NUMBER ACREAGE ACQUISITION ITEM IMPROVED NUMBER SUB- BY TOTAL WITH PROPOSED TOTAL WITH STANDARD W�OTHER UNIM- TO BE NOT TO BUILDINGS DEFT- LAND USES BLDGS.OR IMPROVE- PROVED AC- BE AC- CIENCIES WARRANTING STREETS MENTS QUIRED QUIRED CLEARANCE TOTAL ................ ..................::.... ............................... 1. Streets, Alleys, Public ::::::::::::::::::........ ............................... :............... .......................... ............................... Rights -of -Way, Total !?M :MM8662660600600 a. Nhjor Transportation Eii 1 With ra Fed e 1 Highway Aid 8 Y () Without Federal ....................................... ............................................. ...................... ........................ Highway Aid . . . ....... . ............... ..............................� ....... ............................... b. Other Streete,Alleys, Public Rights-of-Way 2. Residential, Total a. Dwelling Purposes b. Related Public or Semipublic Purposes S. Nonresidential, Total a. Commercial b. Industrial c. Public or Semi ublic (Institutional . ............................... .................. d. Open or Unimproved .. ............................... ......... . ............................... .................. .......... . Land Not Included in ...... ................ .............. .................. ................... Sa, b, or c above 1. CONTEMPLATED TREATMENT Does Not Apply NUMBER NUMBER TO BE NUMBER ITEM TOTAL NUMBER NUMBER TO BE DESIGNATED FOR RETAINED FOR WHICH CLEARED CONSERVATION OR WITHOUT TREATMENT NOT RECONDITIONING TREATMENT YET DETERMINED 1. Area (in Acres) of Parcels With Buildings 2. All Buildings a. Residential Buildings b. Nonresidential Buildings 8. All Dwelling Units a. In Buildings With Deficiencies w b. In Standard Buildings FBL 18-W" war, D. c. • • Appendix - Form H -6120 Under the columnar heading - TO BE ACQUIRED - are 6.8 acres of public right -of -way. Approximately 4.2 acres or 184,706 square feet will be vacated by the City of St. Paul (St. Paul School Board) following the purchase of the abutting disposition parcels (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way). Also proposed for acquisition are 31.3 acres of residential (Dwelling Purposes) land. Included in the noted total of 31.3 acres are 2.26 acres that are to be purchased jointly by the State Highway Department and the LPA and are excluded from urban renewal project activities (See Map No. 1, Boundary Map and Map No. 4, Acquisition Map). This also entails the acquisition of 30 structures that are included in the total 236 structures proposed to be acquired and reflected on Form H -6120. n U n U Intermediate defects, which are less critical and require less exten- sive repair, were found in: outside walls, chimney, porches, found- ation, windows and frames, doors and frames, ceilings, walls and partitions, floors and inadequate original construction. Intermediate defects are not correctable by normal maintenance. They include cracks, rotting, holes, and missing materials and are reported within the category of "building deficiencies" on Form H -6120. Criteria for classifying substandard dwelling units are as follows: dwelling units were classified as substandard if: 1) the dwelling unit was in a substandard structure, 2) the dwelling unit had one or more substandard defects, 3) the dwelling unit had two or more major defects, and 4) the dwelling unit had one major and two or more minor defects. An example of substandard defect is absence of running water inside the unit. An example of a major defect is a shared bath in the unit. An example of a minor defect within a dwell ing unit is one:�room without a window. 2) Description of the survey. A 100% interior - exterior inspection was made of each building in the project area to determine condition and use (See Exhibit A, Survey Data Sheets). In conjunction with these inspections a 100% family characteristic survey and business - institutional occupant survey was taken respectively at each occupied dwelling unit and at all business and institutional establishments. All vacant dwelling units and vacant or abandoned structures were also noted. (There are 11 abandoned structures and 41 vacant units). The basis for the building condition survey was developed through preparation of a checklist for recording visual observation of -3- • • structural condition as prescribed in the Urban Renewal Manual, Chapter 3 -1, Building Deficiencies, to determine: a. Defects (Major) to a point warranting clearance, . b. Structural defects (Intermediate) not correctable by normal maintenance, c. Extensive minor defects (Minor) which, taken collectively, are causing the building to have a deteriorating effect on the surrounding area, d. Inadequate original construction or alteration, e. Inadequate plumbing, heating, or electrical systems. Preparation and production of forms was undertaken by Jack Meltzer Associates who selected the material to reflect provisions of the St. Paul Housing Code in addition to meeting URA requirements as stated in the Urban Renewal Manual . The Business and Institutional Use Survey was patterned after similar forms used by the Detroit Housing Comm- ission and other metropolitan cities. A family characteristics survey was also undertaken at the time of the Building Condition Survey. The information collected conformed to the requirements listed in Chapters 16 -2 -1 and 16 -2 -2 of the Urban Renewal Manual . A listing sheet (See Exhibit A, Survey Data Sheets) was also included in order to aid the survey team in tracking call -backs or incomplete inspections. A team of nine fieldworkers was employed from a group of eleven applicants who responded to advertisements posted in three Twin City colleges and universities by their respective placement office. The first contact with the applicants, prior to employment, was made through the Personnel Director at Macalaster College, St. Thomas College, and the University of Minnesota (the three schools in -4- • which advertisements were placed). • Ten men and one woman applied for the job openings; all were college students and were interviewed individually by two members of the consultant's staff. Eight men and the one woman were hired based on their interests, past job experience, and educational back- grounds. (Sociologica; and engineering backgrounds were most desired). All had at least two years of college education. One man was doing graduate work for his masters degree. The woman was in her senior year of sociology and had previous employment as a social worker. It was anticipated, and later proved correct, that with proper preparation, training, and careful use of survey techniques these nine people, under the continuous and direct supervision of the consultant's staff-,' would accurately and efficiently obtain the necessary information concerning the families and structures in the project area. Training in the use of the form and the recognition of deficiencies was undertaken by two staff members with field experience in St. Paul and other cities. As part of their training, inspections were conducted of various types of structures in the project area, including inspections of both frame and masonry buildings, noting all types of defects, conversions, and blighting influences. In addition, each field worker was given a complete set of instructions to carry on his person (See Exhibit A, Survey Data Sheets). The survey team was under the constant supervision of a staff member who had experience in several cities (including a previous St. Paul survey) in the procedure and mechanics of efficient and thorough data gathering. -5- • Spot checks for accuracy of reporting were conducted by the supervisor (the staff member) during the period of the survey. The mechanics of the data collecting process revolved about a checking -in and a checking -out procedure (with the supervisor), for each surveyor. The purpose being twofold: 1) it insured con - sistant reporting, and 2) it could be applied to the class schedule of the students. At each checking -out, a question and answer routine was conducted by the supervisor with each individual of the survey team. During this period each form was thoroughly re viewed in order to insure completeness of information and to gain further opinions of the fieldworker concerning the attitudes of the people and the prevalent living conditions in their assigned area. This routine also facilitated the solving of problems that may have arisen in the course of the fieldworker's surveying on that particular day. Through this day by day, individual by individual interviewing system, misinformation was eliminated and completeness of reporting was insured. During the checking -in procedure, the fieldworker was given an area to canvass, a general idea as to the amount of time it would entail, and was briefed on problems that had arisen on the previous day in order to avoid repetition. In general, this system served to minimize timewasting and hostility provoking methods of fieldwork and maintain consistency and thoroughness of the field- workers. The second feature of the daily checking -in and checking -out was necessitated by the fact that the fieldworkers (students) had class hours during the day. Their work schedule was organized around their class schedules. No fieldworker was absent or asked to miss any class at his respective school . When the fieldworker was checked -out, 5M. a time and place was set to check -in on the following day and the approximate number of hours to be workedwere discussed in order to facilitate ease in the development of a schedule of assignments for the following day. This allowed the student to attend his classes in addition to giving the supervisor knowledge as to each field - worker's available working time. These daily time and attendance reports and daily working itinerary were developed by the super- visor after consultation with the fieldworker. Each fieldworker worked individually, under immediate super- vision, on the average of thirty -seven hours (each) over a ten day period to complete all field work. All materials used during the process of the survey are maintained in LPA files. 3. Environmental deficiencies. There is no change in the descriptions given on Form H -6101 (in the Survey and Planning Application) Urban Renewal Area Data, Block J, sub- mitted for this project in February, 1963. The sources of information and the standards used to determine the environmental deficiencies as shown on Form H -6101 are updated and listed below. a. Overcrowding or improper location of structures on the land is present. Residential structures are overcrowded on the land and sited too near the street. Most of the lots are less than forty feet wide. Approximately thirty percent of the land is covered by a major structure. Source: Consultant's Field Survey and Sanborn Map Co. b. Excessive dwelling unit density is present. The project is a high density area. In 1957 there were 25.1 dwelling units per gross acre and 29.9 dwelling units per residential acre. There were 0 to 5,000 square feet per dwelling unit for net per residential structure in 1957. Source: City Planning Board. -7- • • c. Conversions to incompatible types of uses are present. Many of the single family structures have been converted to two family dwellings and others have been made into rooming houses. 30 -30.9% of the people living in the area are unrelated individuals and 50 -50.9% are 18 years or older and unmarried. Source: 1960 Census. d. Obsolete building types are present. Some structures have been condemned as uninhabitable for humans. 29% of the structures in the area are sub- standard. Source: Structure Condition Survey. e. Detrimental land uses or conditions are present. The yards and open areas in the neighborhood are poorly maintained. Trucks and other commercial vehicles are stored on vacant lots. Trash and miscellaneous debris is evident in most of the area. Source: Consultant's Field Survey. f. Unsafe, congested, poorly designed, or otherwise deficient streets are present. Streets are poorly designed. Marshall and Western Avenues are heavily traveled, unsafe and congested. Marshall Place is too narrow. Access to points south of Marshall Avenue is inhibited by lack of proper traffic controls on Marshall Avenue. Source: Field Survey. g. Inadequate public utilities or community facilities contributing to unsatisfactory living conditions or economic decline are present. The schools are crowded. The playgrounds are far below the minimum standard (inadequate in size) and poorly maintained. There are no shopping facilities in the project area. Source: Field Survey. The Project Area is presently predominantly residential in character. Improved land totals 40.2 acres of which 31 .0 acres is in residential use and 0.1 in non - residential use. Thus, 77.1% of the net project land is presently in residential use. Data supporting assignment of residential character to properties in mixed use and vacant parcels is noted on Map No. 6, Existing Land Use. Justification of inclusion of any sizable area not meeting "Distribution of Deficiencies" is not applicable. 4. Evidence supporting eligibility of the project as a Non - residential Exception Project: A College, University, or Hospital Project or an Area Redevelopment Exception Project is not applicable. 5. The project does not qualify as a college, hospital or university project. There- fore, evidence of eligible non -cash local grants -in -aid for same is not applicable. 6. When clearance and redevelopment are proposed for the project area or sizable portion thereof: a. Justification for the extent of clearance proposed. Acquisition, clearance, and redevelopment are proposed for a total of 38.4 acres. Of the total 240 structures presently existing, 236 are proposed for clearance. The Cathedral project area is presently a residential area exhibiting extreme conditions of dilapidation and subject to numerous blighting in- fluences and environmental deficiencies. It is bounded on the north by an expressway (presently under construction) and on the east by topography which sharply slopes downward towards to the Central Business District. Apartment buildings and rooming houses compose the vast majority of structures to the south. Inadequate street layout with no curb and gutter, sidewalks, and street lighting, incompatible land use relationships with many residences • poorly converted into rooming houses, excessive dwelling unit densities in these particular structures, lack of schools and other community facilities, and vacant or abandoned buildings are evident blighting factors. Blighting influences are noted only in buildings determined otherwise structurally sound (See Map No. 18, Structure Condition). From this map it is possible to determine the extent of decay, beyond the 29% of the structures deteriorated in condition. These blighting influences are specifically related to individual structures (See Map No. 19, Blighting Influences), and are based on criteria specifically noted in the Urban Renewal Manual, Chapter 10 -1, namely:' 1) Inadequate street layout, 2) Incompatible land use relationships, 3) Overcrowding of buildings on the land, 4) Excessive dwelling unit density, 5) Obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or con- version, and b) Other identified hazards to health and safety and to the general well -being of the community. The blighting influences noted on Map No. 19, Blighting Influences, resulted from inadequate dwelling unit conversion, street layout and structure deficiencies. The following are specific criteria used in classifying structures containing blighting conditions: One or more rooms without heat Shared use of bath or shower facilities Shared use of flush #o'rlet fcrcil-ities Shared use of kitchen facilities - 10 - • • Less than two exits from dwelling unit Inadequate street layout The 22 structures in which these additional conditions exist comprise 23% (of the 97 %) of the buildings considered structurally sound. This is 9% of the total number of buildings in the project area. To further support the extent of clearance proposed, the structure conditions are itemized below. Total all buildings Substandard Deteriorating Blighting Influences Substandardness Otherwise Sound Of the total number of structures, 165 or 69% contain a degree of substandardness warranting clearance for the efficient and complete removal of same. Following is a table noting block -by -block statistics of the condition of structures (relate block numbers to Map No. 4, Acquisition Map). Structure Condition Block & % of Number of Structures Structures Number 240 100 69 29 74 31 22 9 165 69 75 31 Of the total number of structures, 165 or 69% contain a degree of substandardness warranting clearance for the efficient and complete removal of same. Following is a table noting block -by -block statistics of the condition of structures (relate block numbers to Map No. 4, Acquisition Map). Structure Condition Block & Total Number - Structures Sound Deteriorating 1 19 3 1 2 45 16 16 3 17 6 6 4 9 3 5 Buildings With Substandard Deficiencies 15 16 13 29 5 11 1 6 • • Structure: Condition (cont.) Block & Total Number Structures Sound Deteriorating Substandard 5 3 0 0 3 6 26 9 4 13 7 27 14 7 6 8 1 1 0 0 9 17 9 7 1 10 6 3 3 0 11 40 20 15 5 12 12 8 1 3 13 18 5 94 Total 240 97 74 69 100% 40% 31% 29% Buildings With Deficiencies 3 17 13 0 8 3 20 4 13 143 60% Thus, the isolated nature of the residential usage, the extent of dilap- idation, the lack of community facilities, the blighting influences of deter- ioration and substandard structures within the area and the incompatibility of converted residences are all factors rendering the project area unsuitable for rehabilitation. The proposed reuse of the area east of Virginia Avenue (with the exception of a strip of land abutting Marshall Avenue that is proposed to be redeveloped by the First Christian Church) is institutional - to be redeveloped by the City of Saint Paul for a Technical - Vocational High School. The reuse is in con- formance with the Preliminary Land Use Plan for the City of St. Paul (projected to 1980). The proposed reuse of the block north of St. Joseph's Academy is for the much needed (and long overdue) expansion of St. Joseph Academy. The proposed reuse of the project area west of Western Avenue is for medium density (middle income), 221 (d) 3 relocation housing. -12- b. • 11 Only four entities are not proposed for acquisition. (See Map No. 1, Boundary Map) . One, is St. Joseph's Academy and the second is the First Christian Church. Both of these uses, it is anticipated, will expand their existing facilities. The third is composed of two residential structures that are in sound condition and the land use is compatible with the proposed Urban Renewal Plan. The fourth concentration (consisting of a number of existing parcels) will not be acquired with project funds. The ar4a is identified on the Boundary Map and will be excluded from urban renewal project activities. The noted area will be purchased by the State Highway Department and dedicated for highway purposes (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way). Clearance of built up areas. The area to be cleared is built up and meets the criteria in Chapter 10 -1 of the Urban Renewal Manual for clearance of built up areas. Of the total number of structures proposed for clearance 29% are substandard to a degree warranting clearance. In addition, substantial other blighting influences (as previously noted on Map No. 19, Blighting Influences) and environmental deficiencies (as previously noted on Form H -6101 - Survey and Planning Application) exist to further justify the extent of clearance proposed. Of the 240 buildings in the project area, 69 or 29% are substandard, 74 or 31% are deteriorating, and 97 or 40% are sound (22 or 9% of the sound are blighting influences). Sound Deteriorating Substandard Total all buildings 240 97 74 Residential total 239 97 a) Dwelling purposes 236 94 b) Related public, semi - public 3 3 Commercial 1 0 -13- 74 74 0 0 The number of buildings with deficiencies entered on Form H -6120 includes those buildings which are substandard or deteriorating. Those structures which have four or less intermediate deficiencies are not included. Total all bu ildings 240 100% Substandard 69 29% Deteriorating 74 31% Sound 97 40% Thus, 60% of the structures are deficient. The remaining 40% are structurally sound. -14- 't CLASSIFICATION OF BUILDING CONDITIONS The 240 structures in the project area were classified as substandard, deteriorating or sound according to data obtained from the survey of the exterior and interior of each building (See Map No. 18, Structural Condition). Structural defects were considered major, intermediate or minor according to the extent of repair needed for their correction. The following are specified criteria used in classifying the condition of structures. MAJOR DEFECTS: A major defect can be remedied only by extensive repair or rebuilding. Major defects are of the following nature: Considerable areas of missing materials, large cracks, sags and bulges and other indices of serious structural faults. Major defects were found in: The exterior of all buildings: Outside 1Aalls: Obviously not plumb Holes, open cracks, leaks or rotting over considerable area Roofs: Holes, open cracks, leaks, loose or missing material over considerable area Foundation: Sag or sinking foundation (other than frame construction) Holes, open cracks, loose or missing material over considerable area Retaining Wall: Holes, open cracks, loose or missing material over considerable area Other Deficiencies: Extensive unrepaired damage by storm, flood or fire -15- • The interior of all buildings: Structural Deficiencies: Major defects in walls and partitions Major defects in floors and ceilings INTERMEDIATE DEFECTS L' An intermediate defect requires less extensive repair to be rectified. Intermediate defects are not correctable by normal maintenance. They are of the following nature: cracks, rotting, holes and missing materials which, although not necessarily making the building dangerous, indicate problems that could become major defects; in- adequate mechanical systems; and inadequate original construction. They require less extensive repairs than do major defects, but are not correctable by normal maintenance. Intermediate defects were found in: The exterior of all buildings: Porches and Outside Stairs: Missing or broken boards, steps or railings Outside Walls: Holes, open cracks, leaks or rotting minor in extent Roofs: Holes, open. cracks, leaks, loose or missing material minor in extent Sagging roof Windows, Doors and Frames: Breaks, cracks, warping or rotting of frames major in extent Holes, breaks, cracks, loose hinges, etc. of doors Foundation: Sag or sinking foundation (frame only) Holes, open cracks, loose or missing material minor in extent -16- • Inadequate Original Construction: Makeshift Walls No foundation Retaining Walls: • Obviously not plumb Cracked, rotted or missing materials minor in extent Other Deficiencies: Windows or parts of structure boarded up The interior of all buildings: Structural Deficiencies: Major defects in doors and frames, and windows and frames MINOR DEFECTS A minor defect is one that may be readily repaired and does not indicate a serious structural fault. Most minor defects can be corrected in the course of redecorating or normal maintenance. SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURES: A substandard structure provides inadequate shelter or protection against the elements, may endanger the safety of the occupants, or requires extensive major repairs in the basic structural features of the building. A building -vas considered substandard if it had: 1) Two or more major defects, or 2) One major plus four or more intermediate defects. DETERIORATING STRUCTURES: A deteriorating structure requires more repair than would be provided in the course of normal maintenance. A building was considered deteriorating if it had: 1) One major plus less than four intermediate defects, or 2) Four or more intermediate deficiencies with no major defects. -17- • SOUND STRUCTURE: • Sound structures are weathertight and structurally sound. They may have minor deficiencies which have occurred as a result of deferred maintenance, age or overuse which are correctional 'through normal maintenance, redecorating or a moderate amount of repair worle. A building was considered sound if it had: 1) Less than four intermediate defects, and /or 2) Only minor defects. 0 0 CLASSIFICATION OF DWELLING UNIT CONDITION A dwelling unit was classified as either substandard or sound. Those units located in substandard structures were automatically considered substandard. A unit was also considered substandard if it had: 1) One or more substandard defects 2) Two or more major defects 3) One major and two or more minor defects SUBSTANDARD DEFECTS IN DWELLING UNITS Inadequate Plumbing Facilities: No running water inside the building No flush toilet inside the building No shower or bath inside the building No kitchen sink with running water A shared makeshift kitchen sink Inadequate Heating Facilities: No heating equipment MAJOR DEFECTS IN DWELLING UNITS Inadequate Plumbing Facilities: Cold water only in the unit and /or building A shared flush toilet in the unit and /or building A shared bath or shower in the unit and /or building A shared kitchen sink with running water A makeshift kitchen sink Other defects: Two or more rooms without a window Only one exit from a dwelling unit Makeshift dwelling unit in attic or basement Makeshift dwelling unit space designed for commercial or industrial use 1KM • C: Observable major defects in walls, ceilings, floors, doors, or windows MINOR DEFECTS IN DWELLING UNITS One room without a window A flush toilet outside of the unit, although within the building and for the unit's exclusive use A bath or shower outside the unit, although within the building and for the unit's exclusive use Minor defects in walls, ceilings, floors, doors or windows There are 574 dwelling units in the project area. Of these, 291 or 51% are substandard; 283 or 49% are sound. The number of dwelling units in buildings with deficiencies includes those located in structures which are substandard or deteriorating. All dwelling units 574 In substandard buildings 153 In deteriorating buildings 138 In sound buildings 283 C. Justification for the acquisition of basically sound properties which involve high acquisition costs and not incompatible with land use proposals. The acquisition of three residential apartment buildings fronting the north side of Marshall Avenue, between Louis Street and Cathedral Street is essential to the achievement of the plan objectives. Their retention would unduly hamper the proposed redevelopment as well as having an undesirable impact on the marketability and useability of the disposition sites. In addition, the structures if retained would inhibit the achievement of the proposed traffic pattern by restricting the available right -of -way at a location critical to the objectives of the proposed plan. -20 - • • Report on Planning Proposals 1 . Zoning Proposals a. Map No. 7, Existing Zoning, indicating existing zone district classification in the project area, is attached. b. Map No. 5, Proposed Zoning, indicating proposed zone districts,is attached. c. Identification of all zone district; changes required by proposals under b. The dominant percentage of the project area, generally north of Marshall Place , is presently zoned as a "B" Residence District. It is proposed that the area be zoned to a "C" Residence District; this will maintain continuity between the "C" Residence districts south of the project area, and the Western Redevelopment area, zoned a "C" Residence District, to the north. The remaining portions of the Project bordering on Marshall Avenue, which presently are in a "C" Residence District (See Map No. 6, Existing Zoning) are proposed to remain unchanged. d. Statement of timing of proposed zoning changes. The proposed zoning changes will be enacted and become operative during the period of execution following local planning agency acceptance of zoning proposals and as required to implement the plan. The City Planning Board of St. Paul is in accord with the zoning proposals contained herein. The proposals conform to the Compre- hensive Community Plan of the City of St. Paul and were developed in liaison wi th the Planning Board staff. The official plan and supportive material was formally approved by the Planning Board (See R 231). 2. Basis for determination of: a. Proposed land uses, including economic considerations influencing selection of pro- posed reuses for clearance sections. The Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project is located within a one mile radius from the State Capital or the heart of the St. Paul Central Business District. The location 0 0 and topographic advantages of the Cathedral area serve to fulfill the expectation that renewal of the area can provide the City of St. Paul with the opportunities to imaginatively continue and enhance the revitalization of the Summit -Dale Community which lies north and west of the St. Paul Cathedral. The proposed development will satisfy four basic objectives. 1) Provide an opportunity to enhance the city and the community with needed additional public educational, recreational and cultural facilities of ever- lasting benefit. 2) Halt and reverse the present deterioration and decline of the area so that this project will serve as the first element of a comprehensive improvement program encompassing the entire Summit -Dale Community (See Figure 5, Summit -Dale Community). 3) Serve as an opportunity to coordinate renewal with public works such as the Federal Interstate Freeway and the new John Ireland Boulevard (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way). 4) Preserve the existing residential character of the community by the achieve- ment of compatible land uses. The proposed land uses are consistant with sound planning and were developed through coordination and consultation with the city agencies responsible for plan- ning, the public school enrollment and planning projections, park development and institutions within the project area in addition to local and city -wide civic oriented committees. Through this process, it has been possible to reconcile insti- tutional objectives and community requirements. Also, through such coordination and consultation, the plan facilitates the relocation of site displacees. (See R -223, Relocation Report) . The major land use proposals are as follows: 1) Institutional Uses. The area of the project east of Western Avenue (See Map No. 2, Proposed Land Use) !WJ5 • is proposed for institutional uses. Included within this proposal is the expansion of existing semi - public institutions, specifically St. Joseph Academy (girls school) and the First Christian Church, both of which have expressed a desire for additional land to be used for expanding their existing facilities (See attached letters in R225). As noted on the Existing Land Use Map, (Map No. 6) both institutions are located on minimal land areas. In addition, neither institution has parking facilities, although such provision is important necessarily to the respective institutional function. Preliminary Plans of St. Joseph.;- Academy reflect the need for additional classrooms, playground and parking area. Two and one -half (2.5) acres are proposed for such expansion. The First Christian Church is desparately in need of additional parking and open spaces; 1 :1 acres are proposed for their expansion. The interests of the city and community are well served by the preservation of these institutions which are major landmarks in the Summit -Dale Community. In addition, these institutions are valuable cultural assets to the people and the neighborhood and their structures are among the better maintained properties in the area. It is proposed that the remainder or the largest portion of the project area (approx- imately 18.7 acres) be allocated for the site of a new Technical- Vocational High School. The St. Paul Board of Education has selected this site as one of the most desirable geographic locations in the city for this facility. The proposed high school will have classrooms, laboratories, shops, and physical education facilities as well as a five acre park and playfield. Such an educational and recreational facility would be a significant addition to the city's existing com- munity facilities and would unquestionably be of lasting and permanent value. It is proposed that the school be utilized for technical training of high school students, post - graduate students (who wish to advance their ski IIs) and a -3- u LJ vocational high school curriculum for students in the community. Although the main body of the enrollment would be drawn on a city -wide basis, the presence of the educational institution would act as a permanent stabilizer and an institutional anchor for the Summit -Dale Community. The services and facilities of the high school will be available to serve the community, thus being of direct benefit to it. (See Exhibit D, Preliminary Site Plan of Technical - Vocational High School). 2) Residential Relatively little clearance (7.9 acres) is proposed for residential reuse. The prin- ciple purpose of the residential redevelopment which does occur is to provide middle income relocation housing, enhance the rehabilitation opportunities, trigger new investment throughout the area, and implement appropriate plan recommenda- tions. Specifically it is proposed that this area, with exception of one parcel be reserved for the development of relocation housing of low- medium rentals (221 (d) 3) for the express purpose of rehousing families displaced by the Urban Renewal activity within the Cathedral area. The following are excerpts from a letter (addressed to the LPA) from a representative of a possible sponsor for such housing. "On behalf of the Housing Advisor to the International President of American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, ( AFSCME), I wish to take this opportunity to advise your Authority of AFSCME's desire to assist in whatever way you deem necessary through its sponsorship of low- middle in- come and relocation housing under Sections 221 (d) 3 and (d) 4 respectively. -------- - - - - -- Being well aware of the fact that the success of any renewal efforts through clearance directly depends on the ability to relocat6 displaced families, I am authorized by the Housing Advisor of the International President of AFSCME to offer their sponsorship of whatever number of units deemed necessary, not to exceed 400 in number. -4- -------- - - - - -- Please have it understood that the primary interest of this sponsor is sociological. The sponsor is not in the housing business, but upon request sponsors non - profit housing ventures to assist a city in its urban renewal efforts. Since the city is the Union's employer, whatever this Union can do to assist its employer in the solution of its problems is one of the aims of AFSCME's housing interest." It has been determined that the need for such relocation housing exists (See Mark- etability Report, separately bound) and it is intended that clearance and relocation activities be staged so as to maximumize their benefit to displacees from the Cathe- dral area. (See R 223). It would be desirable to rehouse such families within an environment which is familiar to them, thereby easing the strain of relocation upon them and the community. Within the project area there are two - multi -unit residential structures (at the north- east corner of Marshall Avenue and Arundel Avenue) which are conditionally proposed to be excluded from acquisition. These properties have been so designated because of their sound condition, including excellent maintenance. In addition, the character and use of these buildings would not be incompatible with the ad- jacent proposed medium density residential use, provided that additional land be acquired by these properties to meet the maximum density and off - street parking standards of the existing "C" residential! district. Six-tenths of an acre of additional land has been proposed in order to meet this condition. b. Proposed regulations and controls to be imposed on property to be acquired are contained in the Urban Renewal Plan included in this submission and separately bound. These regulations and controls were predicated on: 1) the application and adjustment of the controls set forth in the Legislative Zoning Code and Build- ing Code of the City of the St. Paul adapted as necessary to reconcile market -5- • • considerations and plan objectives, and 2) the establishment of supplementary regulations and controls to govern permitted uses, setbacks coverage, off- strebt parking, and loading facilities, etc., beyond the provisions specified in the Zoning and Building Code of the City of St. Paul as determined by planning, architectural, market and legal considerations. These controls are to apply for a period of thirty (30)years from the date of original approval of this Urban Renewal Plan by the City of St. Paul. c. The City of St. Paul has maintained an effective program of code enactment and enforcement. (See Workable Program recertification). The existing comprehensive system of codes and ordinances assure that minimum standards of health, sanitation, and safety will be maintained in all dwellings. In addition, the proposed regulations and controls which have been established in the Official Plan are more restrictive than the applicable zoning district. These will permit imaginative and flexible redevelopment of the project area, while providing such safeguards which are deemed necessary to protect the integrity of the residential community. d. Modification of existing major streets. The adequacy of all the major streets in the project has been carefully scrutinized as to their function, role and requirements within the scope of the traffic patterns of the city and the community. The traffic plan was evolved for the Cathedral Area Renewal Project with consi- deration given to the following: (1) Conformance to the needs and proposals within the St. Paul Proposed Plan for Thoroughfares. (2) Coordination of Project proposals with the new Interstate Freeway # 94 and the construction of John Ireland Boulevard. (3) Relationship to traffic patterns developed for the Cathedral G NRP as a 2•_ • • result of liaison with the State Highway Department, the St. Paul Planning Board and the St. Paul Department of Public Works. (4) The needs of existing and proposed uses within the project area as guiding the character and development of a clear and workable street system. (5) Utilization of existing rights -of -way and pavement wherever possible and dedication of new right -of -way where available. (6) Provision of the most desirable disposition sites possible consistent with current market considerations. Marshall Avenue, one of the major streets within the project area, is presently one -half of the Marshall- Dayton collector. Dayton Avenue (one block south of the Project and within the GNRP area) carries west bound traffic, while Marshall Avenue carries east bound traffic. With the opening of the Interstate Freeway it is expected that through traffic presently using the Marshall- Dayton pair will be rerouted around the project. Recent preliminary traffic projections, taking note of this, have forecast a substantial need for the Marshall- Dayton two way street system to function as a main community collector street. It is proposed that the Marshall Avenue right -of -way be widened to eighty (80) feet by the provision of an additional fourteen (14) feet on the north side of Marshall. The pavement will be widened from Cathedral Street to Western Avenue to accommodate the additional traffic expected to be generated by the proposed Technical- Vocational High School. During subsequent GNRP renewal projects preceeding the opening of the Freeway, Marshall will be widened to the south of its present right -of -way line at which time Dayton can be eliminated as a collector link. The widened Marshall Avenue will then serve as a two way col- lector street leading from John Ireland Boulevard through the body of the Summit- Da le Communi ty . (See proposal in the General Neighborhood Renewal Plan). -7- • • Western Avenue, the oth'erstreet within the project designated as a collector, will be resurfaced. The role of Western Avenue as a collector is accentuated by the fact that it is one of the few streets traversing the proposed freeway as well as passing through the commercial district in the vicinity of Selby Avenue. Because of its increasing role as a traffic carrier, an additional fourteen (14) feet of right -of -way will be dedicated and reserved to provide for a later widen- ing when required by future anticipated traffic capacity. All streets within the area generally designated for the Technical - Vocational High School site, (i.e. Marshall Avenue to the Freeway right -of -way and Cathedral Place to Virginia Avenue) will be vacated by the School Board (the City) (See,Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way). This will be undertaken in stages as the clearance sections become available for redevelopment. A portion of Virginia from Marshall to Iglehart will be retained to provide access to St. Joseph's Academy,the school and playfield; the remaining segment of Virginia from Iglehart to Carroll will be vacated. Iglehart Avenue from Arundel to Western Avenue and from Western Avenue to Virginia Avenue will also be vacated. The portion of Carroll Avenue lying east of Arundel (within the project area) will be vacated and used for residential purposes. Arundel Avenue from Marshall Avenue to Carroll Avenue will be retained as a residential feeder; the portion of this street from Carroll, north to the project boundary, is proposed to be vacated; in a subsequent project in order to eliminate through traffic. Arundel street, as proposed, will be an integral part of the street pattern proposed for the neighborhood in the GNRP generally bounded by Western Avenue, Dale Street, Marshall Avenue and Frontage Road (See Figure 4, Proposed Traffic System }. IMM The General Neighborhood Renewal Plan(currently on file with HHFA) incorpor- ates a neighborhood traffic plan which is designated to eliminate all through traffic in order to secure a healthy residential environment, (See GNRP, Figure 4, Proposed Traffic System). e. There are no properties within the perimeter boundary of the project to be excluded from the urban renewal area. However, there are a number of parcels on the northern boundary (See Map No. 1, Boundary Map, and Map No. 4, Acquisition Map)of the project will be acquired jointly by the State Highway Department and the Local Public Agency. The portion of the area that will be utilized by the State Highway Department for freeway right -of -way will be excluded from urban renewal project activities. The southern -most portion of the parcels so affected are included in such activities and will be acquired by the LPA on a prorated land - area -only basis. f. Incidental properties not to be acquired within the clearance sections; compatibility of uses of these properties with project renewal objectives; and measures to be taken to insure that the properties conform to the controls or standards established in the plan: There are four properties within the project area that are proposed to be excluded from acquisition. One is St. Joseph's Academy and the second is the First Christian Church. Since these properties are structurally sound and well maintained in add- ition to providing valuable service to the community., there is no question of their compatibility with project renewal objectives, as noted elsewhere in this section. It is anticipated that the proposed institutional atmosphere will trigger community pride throughout the Summit -Dale area. Thirdly, two residential apartment buildings at the northeas#s•r corner of Marshall Avenue and Arundel Avenue have conditionally been excluded from acquisition because of their sound condition and excellent maintenance. These will be allowed to remain, am provided additional land is purchased, by the property owners to prov.ide:,adequate off - street parking and lot area to meet the minimum requirements of a "C" Residence zone. Their use is not incompatible with the proposed residential reuse of the surrounding project area. The Urban Renewal Plan contains several measures to insure that retained properties conform to plan objectives: (1) The controls contained in the Urban Renewal Plan shall be applicable to property which is not to be acquired when the owner thereof acquires project land. (2) Properties not now identified for acquisition may be acquired, and the struc- tures demolished or resold subject to repair and /or reconstruction to conform to the Urban Renewal Plan, in,1,1he: event of: 1) change of use, 2) deterioration, damage, or lack of maintenance which makes such property a blighting influence, or 3) any violation which would bring such property out of conformance with the intent and purpose of the Urban Renewal Plan. g. Adequacy of proposed and existing -to- remain commercial, community, recreational, and public facilities, including those outside of, but serving the project area: The discussions of facilities servicing residential development in the urban renewal project is related to the proposed relocation housing and the retained residential use (west of Western Avenue) which A II comprise all the residential uses within the project. Within the Cathedral General Neighborhood (Minn. R -17) Renewal Plan area which encompasses the project area and lies within the Summit -Dale Community, there will be sufficient and adequate facilities to serve and support the proposed residential development. The total population of the GNRP is estimated by a recent survey (See Relo- cation Appendix, R 223) to be 5,763 people of which 1,345 are located in Project 1. Following clearance and redevelopment the project population ' -10- • • is estimated to be 672 persons; the estimated GNRP population will be increased to approximately 6,100 persons. As noted, GNRP urban renewal activities reflect only a minimum variance in the total projected population. 1) Major Retail Facilities. The Central Business District of St. Paul lies about one mile east of the project. All major needs for durable goods can be met by the commercial development located within the downtown area. 2) Local and Community Retail Business The standards applicable to local community retail business are generally accepted to be dependent upon two factors: 1) the distance to be traveled, and 2) the total population to be served. Located within a one -half mile radius are two local shopping centers. Within the Western Redevelopment Area, north of the Freeway and the project, a size- able new Sears store (100,000 square feet of retail sales area) is nearing completion. A site has also been designated and sold for retail grocery purposes; however, at the time of this submission construction has not commenced. Directly south of the proposed residential area lies the Selby- Western commercial district. In the GNRP this existing retail area is proposed for consolidation and rejuvenation. The existing retail commercial strip development will be modionized with adequate: parking. The existing community retail business establishments are presently adequate to service the entire GNRP area. 3) Public Recreation (active and passive) The Board of Education has indicated that within the site designated for the new high school it will provide a park and playfield of approximately five acres. Included in this facility will be a ball diamond and an area which can be flooded in winter for ice skating. In addition, open space is being devoted to passive • • recreation. The park will be used for school purposes; but, because of the basic post - graduate nature of the technical - vocational school the park and playfield will serve a major role as a neighborhood community facility. It should be recognized that the park will meet the passive and active recreational needs of neighborhood families. The recommended standard for a community park is a ratio of one acre of land area for every 800 persons. The proposed park- playfield meets this standard as applied to the GNRP and will therefore serve as a facility to Project I residents (See Figure 3, Service Area of Parks and Playgrounds). The Cathedral GNRP proposes two additional recreational facilities; one, a neigh- borhood playground and the other a neighborhood park - playground. See the following table: PROPOSED PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS WITHIN CATHEDRAL GNRP Facility Project No. Area Type High School Cathedral Community Park & Playfield Urban Renewal 5.16 Acres Park and Project (No. 1) Playfield McKinley GNRP 5.71 Acres Neighborhood Playground Project (No.2) Playground Selby- Farrington GNRP 1 .87 Acres Neighborhood Park Project (No.3) Park (Passive Recreation and Playground) Total Recreational Acreage: 12.74 Acres All of the proposed parks lie within a one - fourth mile radius from the proposed residential redevelopment area of Project I. The proposed McKinley playground is one -half block west of the residential site.' This playground is to replace and supplement the existing playground bordering Rondo Avenue, which will be aban- -12- • • doned (during Project 2 execution) because of its poor location within the neigh- borhood and the unfavorable topography of the site . Together the school site and playground site comprise a total of 7.39 acres. In summary, there will be a total of 12.74 acres of park and playground within one - fourth mile of the proposed (Project 1) residential development which•*will adequately service the residents of same. 4) Elementary, Junior:H* *h_and'.fiigh;Schd-.ol: McKinley Elementary School presently serving the project residential development is located on Carroll, one -half block west of the project boundary. The struc- ture, built in 1903, occupies a site of 1 .68 acres which is acutely inadequate. The site will be enlarged to 7.39 acres in order to provide expanded playground facilities. During 1962, McKinley school had an enrollment of approximately 600 students in about 20 classes with a mean individual class enrollment of 29.7 students; this approximately equals the city -wide mean of 29.6 students per class. Following the implementation of all the clearance and redevelopment proposed within the project, there will be a resulting net decrease in total population and a corresponding decrease in the number of school -age children within the project. The following table summarizes the expected population change within the project. Total Population Elementary School -Aga Number of Families Children Existing 1,345 349 182 Future 672 * 172 90 ** (Estimated) * Based on 3.29 people /family derived from a preliminary relocation field survey. ** Assuming 0.52 chi ldren /family, ages 5 -12 years. - 13 - • • Thus it has been demonstrated that as the result of project activity the total number of elementary school aged children will be decreased approximately 15 per cent. Correspondingly, it could be estimated that the number of pupil's_ per class in McKinley might drop 15 per cent to a mean of 25 pupils per class -- well below the city average. Marshall Junior High School and the Mechanical Arts High School (a senior high and vocational school - both located within one mile of the project area) presently serve and are expected to continue to service the residential population of the Urban Renewal Project. As noted in the St. Paul Plan for Public Educational Recreational and Cultural Facilities Marshall Junior High School will, in time, expand its existing site and facilities. The construction of the new Technical - Vocational High School will be a valu- able asset to the community and further increase the number of educational facili- ties available to project inhabitants. Supplementary to the city -wide school facilities, parochial and private schools are located in the immediate vicinity of the project area. Within walking distance are: 1) the St. Paul Cathedral 2) St Josephs `Academy (within the project) and 3) the Capital City Junior Academy. In summary, the existing schools are adequately serving the project residents; and as noted above, indications are that following project redevelopment the number of students from the area will be substantially reduced due to project displacement. It can, therefore, be concluded that the above mentioned facilities would provide adequate service to the residents of the Cathedral Urban Renewal Project. 5) Institutional and Community Facilities Two and one -half (2.5) acres of the project are proposed for the expansion of St. Josephs' Academy and 1 .1 acres for the First Christian Church. These institutions -14- 0 .7 are invaluable community assets and are vitally concerned with the proposed redevelopment. Within and immediately surrounding the GNRP are numerous institutions of reli- gious, educational, fraternal and philanthropic nature. Among these are numerous churches such as: the St. Paul Roman Catholic Cathedral, the First Seventh Day Adventist Church, the Dayton Avenue Presbyterian Church, the Redeemer Lutheran Church, the Pilgrim Baptist Church, the St. James AME Church, Peace Church of God in Christ, the Church for Lord Jesus Christ, and the Trinity Lutheran Church. Other elements of the institutional foundation of the Cathedral a.rea would include such worthwhile organizations as the Amherst H. Wilder Welfare Children's Service, the Foriday Nursing Home and the Ober Boy's Club. It is vital to the purposes and objectives (as noted previously) of this plan to encourage the development of the stable residential Summit -Dale Community. Well planned and well maintained public and semi - public institutions are vital to neighborhood and community survival in addition to setting high standards of maintenance as sound examples of civic contribution and pride. It should be noted that these institutions have city -wide and metropolitan influences. 6) Public Utilities The project area is adequately serviced with water capacities. Alterations within the water system are proposed in order to continue water circuits which will be altered by plan objectives. Minor alterations will also be required due to the vacation of a number of interior streets (See R 224). The existing sewer system is a combined storm and sanitary network (See Map No.9, Existing Combination Storm and Sanitary Sewer System). Cooperation and liaison between the LPA, the St. Paul Department of Public Works and the Minnesota - 15 - • • State Highway Department has made it possible to provide two completely independent sewer systems (See Maps No. 10 and 11, Proposed Sanitary Sewer System and Proposed Storm Sewer System, respectively), with the Freeway drainage system providing interceptors and additional flow capacities adequate to carry project discharge. The function and tributary areas of all project interceptors were carefully analyzed in conjunction with proposed land uses before the evaluation of the final plan. The Plan, as herein presented, reflects such considerations and has been reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works (See R 224) . 3. Plan Relationship to Neighborhood The Cathedral Urban Renewal Project No. 1 is an integral part of the Cathedral General Neighborhood Plan area, consisting of an estimated population of 5,763 pedpler(1,382 families) commercial districts, and numerous institutions of utmost importance to the City of St. Paul and more specifically the Summit -Dale Comm- unity (See previous discussion). The project traffic plan as herein presented is the initial stage in the implementation of the GNRP traffic plan which reflects the comprehensive proposals and stated intent of the Proposed Plan for Thoroughfares of the St. Paul City Planning Board. 4. Statement of conformity with the Workable Program for Community Improve- ment (Workable Program) of the City of St. Paul a. The Urban Renewal Plan is in conformity with the General Plan and Program for Community Improvement (Workable Program) of the City of St. Paul. This is reflected in all of the elements of the plan, including Proposed Land Use, Proposed Zoning, Clearance of Blighted Areas, Proposed Traffic Plan, etc. b. Description of the Plan's relationship to definite and identified local objectives. -16- r: 0 Through a close continuing liaison with all the various participating depart- ments of the city government, it has been possible to reflect all local objec- tives respecting appropriate land uses, traffic, public utilities, proposed zoning, and more specifically the assembly of a suitable site for the proposed new Technical - Vocational High School and the elimination of a blighted residential area subject to extreme deterioration. -17- • • Report on Minority Group Considerations 1. All housing within the project area will be available to racial minority groupsi. The Minnesota State Act Against Discrimination, approved by the Minnesota Legislature in April of 1961 (See Exhibit G) established the State Commission Against Discrimination which is empowered to "Foster equal employment and housing opportunity for all individuals in the state in accordance with their fullest capacities regardless of race, color, creed, religion or national origin and to safeguard their rights to obtain and hold employment, housing and other real property without discrimination." By state law, all of the 574 dwelling units within the project are available to racial minority groups; but, in absolute terms, less than one fifth, or 105, of the 543 dwelling units contained in structures proposed for demolition are occupied by minority families. The remaining 31 dwelling units, conditionally excluded from acquisition, are not presently occupied by minority families. 2. Specific proposals for provision of housing to compensate for racial minority occupancy. The proposed residential redevelopment in the project entails the construction of approx- imately 160 dwelling units of 221 (d) 3 relocation housing. Since this housing would be available to all relocatees, without regard to race, there would consequently be no net reduction in the units available to minority families. As a matter of fact, a possible eventual increase of 52 percent or 55 dwelling units may occur, although it is hoped that a cross section of relocatees will avail themselves of this relocation housing. In addition, (at the time of this submission), there are under construction 100 family type housing units and 483 housing units for the elderly in three public housing projects. There are also 189 family type housing units and 124 housing units for the elderly in three other projects currently in the design phase of development. 3. Stops taken, and results achieved, in conculsing with representatives of minority groups. The Summit -Dale Community Planning Committee, a recently formed organization has interest in all planning and renewal activities that would serve to affect the Summit- • Dale community (of which this project is a part) as defined by the City Planning Board. The organization meets approximately once a month and discusses subjects of vital interest to the community. Recent discussion has primarily centered around the Technical - Vocational High School location and the Cathedral Neighborhood. The organization has wide representation including members of the LPA staff and its commissioners, members of the Metropolitan Improvement Committee and its Architectural Counseling Committee, representation from the City Planning Board, representation from the Dale -Selby Action Council (which represents primarily the white population in the neighborhood) the North Central Community Council (representing the non -white population), Capital Community Services and the Hallie Q. Brown House. The two latter organizations are United Fund (Community Chest) sponsored organizations within the Summit -Dale Community. The North Central Community Council, mentioned above, has functioned for a - number of years to serve the neighborhood from Cathedral to Lexington Parkway and from Selby Avenue to University Avenue. (See Figure 5). Two of the leaders of the council are, the president LeRoy Lazenberg and Reverend Floyd Massey of the Pilgrim Baptist Church. The organization represents primarily the non -white population of the community and functions as a neighborhood organization supporting renewal activity; although the Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project is only a part of the Selby -Dale Area, this organization understands that a successful Cathedral project is the first step toward renewal actions in the remaining portions of the neighborhood. _ -2- • • Subject Urban Renewal Project is a total clearance program and only three parcels within the project boundary are to be retained. The four structures on these parcels are in conformance with the proposed land use plan and were found to be in sound and standard condition. LAND ACQUISITION REPORT R -222 Project activity will include the acquisition of properties within the renewal project area as necessary to carry out the objectives of the Renewal Plan. Three parcels of land (Parcels 12 -15, 8 -1 and 7 =13) are not contemplated for purchase. The first two parcels contain the major structures of the First Christian Church and St. Joseph's Academy. The third parcel (7 -13) contains two residential struc- tures. The acquisition costs reflected herein includes purchase of Parcel 7 -13; however, costs for the two other parcels are not included. Properties will be acquired in essentially four different weys. The major portion of the land will be acquired by direct negotiation with property owners or, if necessary, by con- demnation. A- lesser amount of land will be acquired from the State of Minnesota by means of a joint acquisition contract with the Minnesota Highway Department. Two parcels are to be purchased as partial takings and involve severence value. Some tax forfeited properties within the Project Area will be obtained from the State of Minnesota and are considered donations. The value of the donation is based on the average acquisition cost for land only, as contained in the various appraisal reports. Minor amounts of land will be gained by the vacation of cer- tain street areas within the Project. This Report is prepared with appraisal value information gathered on 32`r of the total number of parcels to be acquired. Although the Authority has not received all of the acquisition appraisals, it is believed that the representative sample provides ample information for the determination of the expected real estate pur- chase costs for the primary acquisition parcels. The property map is contained herein as Map 4 and shows essentially the parcel numbers, owners and areas of land within the-Project which are to be acquired or excluded from purchase by the Authority. The classification of ownership is shown for various parcels and the streets and alleys that are to be vacated by Authority initiation are also shown. It should be noted that some streets are to be vacated in joint petition with existing property owners and the actual area of land to be obtained by the Authority through this action essentially follows 0 0 the center lines of these streets. Areas of land to involve street vacation, as indicated on the property map, are only the lands which will become the property of the Authority by vacation. A segment of Marshaii Place, a segment of Farrington Street, and a full block of Iglehait Will involve the vacation by the Authority in joint petition with two adjacent property owners. Firm commitments from the prop- erty owners to join in this joint vacation has not as yet been obtained. The vacations have been reviewed with representatives of both the First Christian Church and St. Joseph's Academy, and the procedure proposed is expected to be satisfactory. A total of 66 acquisition appraisals are bound separately and are considered a part of this Part I Application. The attached appraisals are as follows: One Binder containing 22 appraisals from Emil H. Nelson One Binder containing 21 appraisals from F.M. & E.V. Dolan One Binder containing 23 appraisals from Chandler B. Davis One Binder containing building and land comparables The Property Map is contained herein as Map 4 and the tabulation of properties to be acquired is contained as Exhibit "C ". - 2 - • ESTIMATE OF ACQUISITION COSTS 1. Primary Acquisition Parcels l Appraisal information has been received from the three acquisition appraisers now performing the first acquisition appraisals for the Authority and are attached as Exhibit "A ". Information contained in the reports serves to reveal parcel numbers and expected acquisition cost for various properties, as shown on Exhibit "B ". The following tabulation shows the relationship between the Full & True Value of properties and the expected land purchase cost for these properties: Full & True Value (land & buildings) of sample: $288,675 Purchase price of sample: Acquisition Factor: $882,800 3.6 Exhibit "C" at the end of this coded section serves to show the parcel number, and the Full & True Values of properties considered of the type and the areas by block. The above mentioned acquisition factor, when applied to the Full & True Value, essentially results in the expected purchase price of properties. The total Full & True Value for all properties to be purchased in this manner is $789,900 (789,900 x 3.06) and, therefore, the expected land purchase price for this category is $2,417,094, plus land assembly estimate of $39,414 = $21456,508. 2. Purchase Jointly with Minnesota Highway Department The northern portions of Blocks 1 & 2 will be purchased by joint acqui- sition with the Minnesota Highway Department. The LPA will become the owners of all land southerly of the highway right -of -way line shown within Parcels 1 -2 and 2 -2. This Department has indicated that the LPA would be obligated to pay only the prorated value of the land purchase involved without any compensation for building value. As the LPA in- tends to enter a joint acquisition contract with the Minnesota Highway Department in order to purchase these properties, the LPA will not appraise the properties. A precise determination of the payment amount has not been made for the portions of the properties that will become a - 3 - y • • part of the Project. The acquisition appraisals, presently being pre- pared by the appraisers now appraising property as a part of Project planning, serve to indicate that the land value (exclusive of buildings) throughout the Project is approximately 25¢ per square foot. It is, therefore, expected that the purchase price of these properties, on the basis of 84,208 square feet of land to be purchased and upon the appli- cation of this value per square foot,-is 84,208 square feet at 25¢ or $21,052. 3. Partial Takings Land acquisition will include the purchase of some property from the First Christian Church and from St. Joseph's Academy. This land will be purchased as a part of Project activity (similar to all properties abutting Marshall Avenue) and will be a part of the land to be dis- posed of to the City of Saint Paul for street improvements on Marshall Avenue. The appraisals of these two properties (Parcels 8 -2 and 12 -16) have not as yet been made; however, the appraisal will include both the land value and the value of the damages to the existing property owners. The two properties have a total area of 10,821 square feet. For the purposes of estimation and assuming that the land value is 25¢ per square foot, the land purchase price will be approximately $2,705 plus an estimated $159000 for damages to the existing proper- ties for wall and building entrance revisions as necessary. The total acquisition of these two parcels, therefore, is estimated at $17,705. 4. Donations (Tax Forfeited) A number of properties within the Project area are presently tax for- feited land and are in the ownership of the State of Minnesota. The LPA expects to acquire these properties without cost and the value of these lands will be computed and claimed for non -cash grant -in -aid credit as land donations. The following properties are involved in this form of acquisition: - 4 - • • Acquisition by Donation from the State of Minnesota (Tax Forfeit) Block & Parcel Area in Sq. Ft. Cost 2-30 10,425 None 3 -4 547 None 3 -7 547 None 4 -1 13y645 None 5 -2 10,566 None 6 -26 59519 None 10 -2 213 None 11 -22 59159 None 12 -3 13,452 None 12 -6 150 None 12 -11 150 None 13 -7 50600 None 76,179 Sq.ft. Land Donation The value of this land to be claimed as non -cash grant- in-aid credit on the basis of 25¢ per square foot, or $19,045. 5. Street Vacations (Donations from City to LPA) Street vacations, a requirement of the Redevelopment Plan, without cost will be performed by initiation of the LPA and will produce land for the LPA disposition. Street vacations ordinarily require payment to the City on the basis of land value or termed "adequate compensation ". Sec- tion 129 of the City Charter reads as follows: "No vacation of any 6treet, alley or public grounds in said City shall hereafter be allowed except upon such terms and conditions as to the compensation, if any, or be paid by the persons seeking such vacation, or otherwise as shall be specified in the resolution ordering such vacation, nor shall said Council order any vacation without adequate compensation to said City." - 5 - • • As the Renewal Plan requires vacation without compensation, the value of land to be vacated is claimed for non -cash grant -in -aid credit. These lands include portions of Marshall Place, Farrington Street, Iglehart Avenue and Virginia Street, with a total area of 97,143 square �edt: The value of this land dompbted at 25¢ per square foot is $24,286. 6. Street Vacations (Donations from City to Department of Education) Certain streets within the parcel of land to be sold to the Department of Education will be vacated by the Department of Education as a require- ment of the Plan. As these vacations are a Plan requirement, the value of the amount of land involved is claimed for non -cash grant -in -aid purposes. A total of 184,706 square feet is required to be vacated. Assuming the donated value at 25¢ per square foot, the value of credit is estimated as $46,176. 7. Minnesota Highway Department Interstate 94 The Minnesota Highway Department will purchase and retain for right- of-way purposes the northern portions of Blocks 1 and 2 (Parcels 1 -1 and 2 -1). Acquisition for this purpose will involve 44,750 square feet in Block 1 and 53,982 square feet in Block 2, or a total of 98,732 square feet. 8. Tentative Exclusion from Purchase Parcel 7 -13 contains two residential structures that are tentatively deemed adequate to remain within the renewal area. These structures have a substantial deficiency in necessary parking space and conflict with the Renewal Plan requirements relative to site space. A disposi- tion parcel of land will be made available for purchase by the owner of this parcel. In the event the disposition parcel is not purchased for the intended parking use, Parcel 7 -13 (area of 12,994 square feet) could be purchased and disposed of with Disposition Parcel No. 5 (see Code R -225) for use in accordance with -the Plan requirements. The cost of purchase, estimated at $1489735 (3.11 X F &T of 47,825), is therefore included in the total estimate of acquisition costs at this time. • • 9. Street Vacations (Donations from City to Owners of Excluded Parcels) Portions of Iglehart, Cathedral Place and Farrington Street are to be vacated as a requirement of the Plan. The LPA has no claim to this land as it would revert to the existing adjacent property owners (First Christian Church and St. Joseph's Academy). The local procedure ordin- arily requires payment to the City. The Plan states that all vacations will be made "without assessmentl'against land within the Project boun- daries". As this land is to be donated by the City, the value of such eland is claimed as non -cash grant- in- aid'credit to the Project. A total of 14,511 square feet of land is involved. Assuming a value, i again, of 25¢ per square foot, the value of the donation is computed as (14,461 X 250 or $1,702. The following serves to show the type, area and acquisition cost of land in various categories; land to be acquired without cost, or land to be acquired by others, thereby producing the total acquisition area: Type Area in Acquisition Donated No. Type Square Feet Cost Value N -C G -L -A 1 Primary Parcels 1,115,863 214561508 2 Minnesota Highway Dept. 84,208 21,052 - 3 Partial Takings (Parcels 8 -2 & 12 -16) 10,821 17,705 - 4 Donations (LPA from State of Minn. tax forfeit) 76,179 - 19,045 5 Donations - Street Vaca- tions (LPA from City of Saint Paul) 97,143 - 24,286 6 Donations - Street Vaca- tions (Dept. of Education from City 184,706 - 46,176 7 Minnesota Highway Depart- ment Purchase (Parcels 2 -1 & 2 -2) 98,732 - - 8 Tentative Exclusion from Purchase (Parcel 7 -13) 12,994 148,735 9 Donations - Street Vaca- tions (to excluded par- cels from City) 14, 511 - 3;702 1,695,457 2,644,00 91,209 -7- • The property line map shows 1,287,071 square feet of acquisition by par- cels which includes purchase types 1, 2, 3 and 4 above. The LPA will also obtain 97,143 square'feet (type 5 above) or a total acquisition of 1,384,214 square feet. A farther tabulation of properties to be acquired as required by Part 13 -3 Exhibit B of the Urban Renewal Manual is as follows: TA'RTTTATTnN OR PROPERTY Tn TM A00TTTPV.n Estimates of Land Area Appraiser's LPA Estimate Value and No.of in Valuations of Acquisition Parcels Square Feet Land Total Acquisition Cost Only Cost a. Total pur- chases and donations 227 1,397,208 $ - $ - $2,644,000* b. Purchases (Total) 211 1,223,886 $ - $ - $2,604,586 Federally owned or leased - - _ _ _ Other pub- licly owned 2 94,208 - - 21,052 Privately owned 207 1,139,678 - - $2,568,534 Public util- ity easements - Damage to prop- erty not taken 2 - 15,000 c. Donations (Total) 16 1731322 $ - $ - $ 0 Vacation of streets and other public rights -of -way 4 97,143 Donations by LPA - - Donations by other entities 12 76,179 - - 0 *Includes land assembly estimate of $39,414. 0 EAUL R. NELSON, S.R.A. REALTOR AND APPP", ISER 10 WEST 4TH .1 (ACROSS FROM COUR...JUSE) ST. PAUL 2. MINN. CAPITAL 4.5331 puk NEW ADDRESSs 921 Commerce Didq. ST. PAUL 1, MINN. St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority 55 East--,Fifth Street St. Paul 1, Minnesota Gentlemen: r] April 15, 1963 RE: Part One Cathedral Appraisals In response to youn request, I have personally inspected the parcels listed below, for the purpose of making an appraisal of each parcel and arriving at my opinion of their market value. The legal description, address and all other data is set forth in each indi- vidual Appraisal report. Also accompanying this first install*ent of my Cathedral Project Appraisals is a brief description of the neighborhood and the general area. Part One of the Appraisals are listed below together with the parcel number, the address and the final opinion of Market Value: FARCAL NUMBER ADDRESS MARKET VALUE C1 -9 286 Louis St. $ 5,500.00 C1 -10 233 Iglehart Ave. $ 9,000.00 C1 -11 227 Iglehart Ave. $ 9,200.00 C1 -12 225 Iglehart Ave. $ 17,000.00 C1 -13 217 Iglehart Ave. $ 7,000.00 C1 -14 273 Cathedral Place $ 4,000.00 C13 -1 271 Cathedral Place $ 9,000.00 C13 -2 222 Iglehart Ave. $ 15,000.00 C13 -3 228 Iglehart Ave. $ 16,500.00 C13 -4 232 Iglehart Ave. $ 21,000.00 C14 -5 260 -62 Louis St. $ 10,500.00 c13 -6 256 Louis St. $ 77500..00 C13 -8 250 Louis St. $ 6,500.00 C13 -9 248 Louis St. $ 7,000.00 C13 -aA 244 Louis St. $ 10,000.00 C13-32 225 -35 Marshall Are. $135,000.00 C13 -14 247 Cathedral Plac_4 $ 17,000.00 C13 -15 251 Cathedral Place $ 11,000.00 C13 -16 255 Cathedral Place $ 10,500.00 C13 -17 257 Cathedral Place $ 12,500.00 C13 -18 259 Cathedral Place $ 14,500.00 C13 -19 265 Cathedral Place $ 12,500.00 Sincerely, Emil H. 'e on EXHIBIT "A" 0 DAVIS & LAGERMAN 998 19"11OOTT- ON -3tO"=W 33XMG. SAINT PAUL Y. MINNESOTA T•I.aheR.l 222.15571 CHANDLER S. DAVIS • Mr. R. E. Lambert Acting Executive Director Housing and Redevelopment Authority 55 East Fifth Street St. Paul 1, Minnesota Re: R -25 Cathredal Project I Acquisition Appraisals Dear Cdr. Lambert: REAL ESTATE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SALES PROPERTY MANAGEMENT APPRAISALS INSURANCE April 17, 1963 Enclosed are twenty -three of those appraisals assigned to me in the Cathedral Acquisition project. The appraisals included in this group are listed below, together with appraised valuation: C4 -2 366 Carroll Avenue $15,5GO C74 400 Iglehart Avenue $7,900 C4 -3 368 Carroll Avenue 81300 C7 -5 402 Iglehart Avenue 9,200 C44 370 Carroll Avenue 8,800 C7-6 406 Iglehart Avenue 11,500 C4 -5 378 Carroll Avenue 1,350 C7 -7 410 Iglehart Avenue 10,500 Ch-6 377 Iglehart Avenue 92200 C7 10 418 Iglehart Avenue 6,750 C4 -7 375 Iglehart Avenue 10,400 420 C4 -8 371 Iglehart Avenue 1,400 C7 -18 409 Marshall Avenue 8,750 C4 -9 365 Iglehart Avenue 71000 C7 -19 403 -5 Marshall Ave. 19,000 C4 -11 357 Iglehart Avenue 7050 C7 -20 401 Marshall Avenue 9,500 C4 -12 353 Iglehart Avenue 9,800 C7 -21 397 Marshall Avenue 15,000 C7 -2A 394 Iglehart Avenue 10,500 C7 -23 389 Marshall Avenue 9,300 07 -3 396 Iglehart Avenue 8,250 C12 -2 243 =251 Marshall Ave-40#000 In accordance with our understanding, the market data submitted in connection with these appraisals is under a separate binder and is submitted jointly with the other two appraisers presently working on this same project. I trust that I have completed the forms in accordance with you wishes. I shall be pleased, however, to receive any suggestions you might have as to completion of these reports on the remaining property. Respectfully u 'tted, CBD :eb Chandler B. Davis, M.A.I. enc. EXHIBIT "A" F. M. AND E. V. DOLAN REALTORS AND APPRAISERS PIONEER BUILDING ST. PAUL 1. MINNESOTA 221 -7811 April 17, 1963 Housing & Redevelopment Authority 55 East 5th Street St. Paul, Minnesota. Gentlemen: Re: Cathedral Project Pursuant to your request, I have made an inspection and appraisal of the following properties: Block Parcel Address E stimate of Val ue 2 21 290 Farrington $5,500 2 22 284 -286 Farrington 10,000 2 23 317 Iglehart 8,000 2 24 311 Iglehart 12,250 2 25 309 Iglehart 7,500 2 26 305 Iglehart 8,500 2 27 301 Iglehart 8,250 2 28 297 Iglehart 6,200 2 29 293 Iglehart 7,000 2 31 281 Iglehart 10,500 2 32 279 Iglehart 5,500 2 33 277 Iglehart 7,500 2 34 273 Iglehart 4,250 2 35 269 Iglehart 11,300 2 36A 259 Iglehart 7,600 2 37 255 Iglehart 9,600 2 39 243 Iglehart 5,500 2 41 277 Louis 7,500 2 42 281 Louis 6,200 2 43 285 Louis 6,200 13 13 209 Marshall 115, 000. This appraisal is made subject to certain limiting conditions as hereinafter contained. Such facts and information contained EXHIBIT "A" • • CATHEDRAL PROJECT I DETERMINATIOdN OF ACQUISITION FACTOR Block & Parcel F & T Purchase Price Factor___ Cl 9 1925 5,500 2.857 10 2425 9,000 3,711 11 3250 95200 2.831 12 6875 179000 2.473 13 2550, 71000 2.745 14 1550 4,000 2.581 13 1 2650 99000 3,396 2 4900 159000 3.061 3 7650 16,500 2.157 4 7225 21,000 2.906 5 3950 109500 2,658 6 2200 7,500 3,409 8 1825 69500 3062 9 1900 73,000 3,684 10 3600 109000 2,778 11 42600 1353,000 3,169 14 5650 17,000 3,009 15 3950 119000 2.785 16 3750 109500 2,800 17 4350 12,500 2,874 18 4850 14000 2.990 19 4900 12,500 2,551 4 2 4750 15,500 3,263 3 2200 8,300 3.773 4 2450 81800 3092 5 750 1,350 1,800 6 2975 9,200 31092 7 1825 109400 5,699 8 675 1,400 2.074 9 1925 79000 3.636 11 2900 79350 2,534 12 2900 9,800 3.379 7 2A 3325 109,500 3,158 3 2350 8,250 3.511 4 1975 79900 4,000 5 2725 9,200 3.376 6 3175 119500 3,622 7 2075 109500 5,060 10 1675 62750 4,030 18 2400 89750 3,646 19 4050 191,000 4.691 20 2500 9,500 3,800 21 5400 15,000 2.778 23 2600 99300 3.577 12 2 17250 409000 29319 2 21 2100 59500 2.619 22 3350 10,000 2.985 23 3000 80000 2.667 24 4225 121,250 2,899 25 2400 7,500 3.125 26 2350 89500 3,617 27 2700 89250 3,056 28 2150 69200 2.884 29 2300 7,000 3.043 EXHIBIT "B" DETERMINATION OF ACQUISITION FACTOR - Cont'd Block & Parcel F & T Purchase Price Factor C2 31 2850 109500 3,684 32 1900 59500 2.895 33 2500 79500 3.000 34 1200 49250 3.542 35 2559 11,,300 4.431 36A 2550 7,600 2,980 37 2850 9,600 3,368 39 1425 59500 3,860 41 1900 79500 3,947 42 2000 69200 3.100 43 1300 69200 4.769 13 13 41700 1159000 2.758 Total 288675 8829,800 3.058 For purposes of estimation, the factor of 3.06 is used. This acquisition factor, when applied times the full and true value of properties, will produce the expected average purchase price. EXHIBIT "B" • • CATHEDRAL PROJECT I ESTIMATE OF ACQUISITION COST Parcel No. Area in Sauare:Feet Full & True 1 -10 2,425 11 3,250 12 6,875 13 2,550 14 1.550 Total 252000 169650 2 -21 2,100 22 3,350 23 3,000 24 4,225 25 2,400 26 2,350 27 2,700 28 2,150 29 2000 31 2,850 32 1,900 33 2,500 34 1,200 35 2,550 36 6,650 37 2t850 38 89200 39 1,425 40 2,650 41 1,900 42 2,000 43 1,300 Total 111,184 629550 3 -1 3,800 2 1,250 3 1,250 5 2,300 6 4,550 8 3,250 9 2,100 10 825 11 850 12 1,925 13 1,775 14 2,225 15 2,725 16 3,700 17 1,800 18 1,350 19 550 :Total 72,630 36,225 EXHIBIT "C" 0 0 0 ESTIMATE OF ACQUISITION COST - Cont'd Parcel No. Area in Souare Feet Full & True 4-2 4,750 3 2,200 4 2,450 5 750 6 2,975 7 1,825 8 675 9 1,925 10 1,825 11 2,900 12 2.900 Total 65,405 259175 5-1 1,075 3 1,275 4 2.300 Total 159832 4,650 6 -1 3,600 2 2,450 3 1,600 4 2,400 5 2,350 6 2000 7 1,550 8 2,050 9 1,800 10 1,950 11 3,250 12 650 13 1,200 14 1,200 15 4,050 16 5,950 17 4,000 18 4,000 19 3,650 20 1250 21 3,375 22 4 725 23 3,225 24 5,375 25 35625 27 2,900 28 1245 Total 150,839 75,925 7 -1 10,725 2 8,950 3 2,350 4 1,975 5 2,725 3,175 7 2,075 8 3,625 EXHIBIT "C" • • ESTIMATE OF ACQUISITION COST - Cont'd Parcel No. Area _in S4uare Feet Full & Tru 7 -9 5,225 10 1,675 11 4,550 12 5,525 14 4,275 15 4,100 16 3,650 17 3,550 18 2,400 19 49050 20 2,500 21 5,400 22 6,100 23 2,600 24 4.2 Total 1439595 952400 9 -1 3,200 2 29625 3 2,325 4 1,875 5 25 6 1,175 7 1,825 8 2,125 19 3,525 10 1,500 11 1,150 12 675 13 2,000 14 2,700 15 1,450 16 4,000 17 1,850 18 2,125 19 2,475 Total 83,331 389625 10 -1 7,050 3 7,150 4 5 625 5 1,775 6 3,200 7 6.100 Total 299326 309900 11 -1 4,950 2 2,300 3 29350 4 2,050 5 2,400 6 3,200 7 2,300 8 3,100 9 3,300 EXHIBIT "C" • • ESTIMATE OF ACQUISITION COST- Cont'd Parcel No. Area in Square Feet Full & True 11 -10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Tota 1 12 -1 2 4 5 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 Total 13 -1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 231,872 72,042 2,850 5,100 4,900 4,950 2,375 3,875 2,150 3,200 32800 1,350 1,300 1,850 2,800 2,425 2,375 2,700 5,150 49225 325 2,150 650 850 825 2,475 850 325 2,625 2,450 2,000 625 2,000 3,450 2,550 2.550 110,025 4,150 17,250 6,000 6,750 3,050 1,100 4,050 6,100 7,025 8,450 3.10 0 67,025 2,650 4,900 6,750 7,225 3,950 2,200 1,825 1,900 EXHIBIT "C" 0 0 ESTIMATE OF ACQUISITION COST - Cont'd Parcel No. Area in Square Feet Full & True 13 -10 1,600 1- 42, 600 12 80,000 �3 41, 700 14 5,650 15 16 3,950 �7 3, 750 4,350 18 4.,850 19 4,goo Total 115,157 226,750 RECAPITULATION Block 1 25,000 16,650 2 111,184 62,550 3 72,630 36,225 4 65,405 25.,175 5 15,832 4,650 6 150,839 75,925 143,595 95,400 8 9 83,331 38,625 10 29., 326 30,900 11 231,872 110,025 12 71,692 67,025 13 115,157 226,750 1, 11S, 863 789:900 789,900 X $3.o6 = $2,417,094 Land Assembly Estimate 39,414 Total $2,456,508 aM■:M R 223 RELOCATION REPORT R 223 Ll • I. Relocation Program A. Administrative Organization C It will be the responsibility of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of St. Paul (herein referred to as the Local Public Agency - LPA) to administer services and assist in the relocation of all persons displaced from the Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project. The LPA will not place the responsibility for carrying out the relocation of families in more than one agency. Relocation services for business concerns will be conducted separately as described in this Plan. The central relocation office of the city is a part of the local public agency and is presently in operation in the City of St. Paul . This is the central clearing house for the relocation of families, individuals and bus- iness as a result of any and all public actions, urban renewal areas, code enforcement, highway actions, and other governmental activities, with services being available to everyone who desires help in relocating. The experience of handling the relocation work of displacees from previous urban renewal activity and code enforcement indicates the need for an adequate staff so that frequent contact with the families, individuals and business concerns affected can be maintained and human values and standards be protected as the project progresses. Displaced families will be given the opportunity to move from the site into "decent, safe and sanitary" units in accordance with a well - developed schedule and in a manner that causes a minimum of inconvenience and social dislocation. Based on past experience, and taking into account the magnitude of the Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project, the proposed relocation staff will adequately serve the families involved. The proposed relocation staff will consist of: a Relocation Officer, Assistant Relocation Officer, two 0 S Family Assistants, Property Management Coordinator, Housing Locator and a Clerk- Stenographer. All of these persons, excepting the Housing Locator, have had previous experience in relocation. Their specific duties and responsibilities are generally as follows: Relocation Officer Summary of Duties Under the general supervision of the Executive Director and with latitude for independent action plans, coordinates and directs a program to rehouse site residents and perform efficient management functions. Specific Duties 1. Develops operating procedures and forms to effect efficient methods and controls. 2. Supervises the program of relocating site occupants from Redevelopment Project Sites,. 3. Maintains liaison with the Land Acquisition Coordinator, property management, and the public housing tenant selection office. 4. Advises the Executive Director on relocation problems, recommends rental rates, verifies vacancies and certifies the proper rehousing of site occupants. 5. Prepares budgets and staffing patterns upon request. 6. Develops and carries on a program of public relations through individual and group contacts. Establishes and maintains contacts with community agencies and organizations. Acts as Secretary to the Relocation Advisory Council. 7. Supervises staff of Rehousing Office. -2 - n LJ Summary of Duties Assistant Relocation Officer M LJ Under the general supervision of the Relocation Officer, assists in planning, coordinating and supervising a program to rehouse residents in a redevelopment project area. Supervises property management and performs related duties as assigned. Specific Duties 1 . As working supervisor plans, directs, supervises and evaluates the work of subordinates and /or performs the duties himself. 2. Suggests, discusses and assists in formulating plans to locate suitable housing for site occupants. 3. Makes recommendations regarding more efficient methods of internal operations and procedures. 4. Assists 'in the management functions of rehousing office such as requisitioning supplies, preparing budgets, making recommendations on personnel actions. 5. May be assigned management functions in area office. b. During absence of the Relocation Officer, acts in that capacity. 7. Gives direct supervision to Property Management Coordinator. Assists in recommending proper monthly rental charges. 8. Chekcs all needed repairs when amount of repair is expected to exceed $50.00 and recommends feasibility of repair or suggest other action. 9. Inspects repairs to structures to insure that such repair is according to specification and that charges are not excessive. i. 10. Inventories property after vacation, makes determination whether materials would be sold for salvage or scrap and arranges for sale. 11. Prepares classified advertising for insertion in daily paper or special press. 12. Interviews clients in difficult situations where antagonisms to program may exist. 13. Makes inspections on move -outs where it is anticipated that it may be -3- • • difficult to gain access or obtain information. 14. Completes final step in acquisition by making out necessary form and affidavits for 5% possession retainer. Family Assistant Summary of Duties Under the supervision of the Relocation Officer, the incument of this position accomplishes the relocation of families in the Redevelopment area. Specific Duties 1 . Visits families in area to give and obtain information relative to their housing needs. 2. Evaluates social and economic data on family and formulates a plan for relocation. 3. Obtains data on structure and dwelling unit. 4. Makes community contacts for the purpose of obtaining listings on available housing or to obtain other information or assistance related to the relocation of families in .the Project Area. 5. Inspects available housing to determine its adequacy in meeting housing standards. b. Compiles and summarizes data for statistical and narrative reports, and maintains other required records. Property Management Coordination Summary of Duties Under the supervision of the Relocation Officer, is responsible for property management functions of acquired properties. Supervises and directs collection of rents, maintenance repairs, inspections, vacations, posting and protection of all acquired properties. Specific Duties 1 . , Inspects property prior to possession and recommends suitable rental. -4- • • 2. Recommends necessary repairs to keep premises habitable or recommends that structure be vacated. 3. Collects rents. Works out arrangement for paying delinquent rent. Consults with Relocation Officer regarding necessity for legal action or eviction for persons who refuse to pay rent. 4. Performs all necessary actions after property has been vacated. Posts property. Notifies utility companies to discontinue service and remove equipment and meters. Secures property insofar as possible against vandal- ism and burglary. 5. Keeps systematic record of accounts receivable. Compiles reports at required intervals. Prepares or arranges for preparation of rent statements. Makes bank deposits. b. Audits statements on scales and services to structures and forwards to Central Office for payment. 7. Maintains close liaison with Family Assistants and other staff members so that relocation schedules are met, but that relocation of families is carried out in accordance with all regulations and objectives. Housing Locator Summary of Duties Under the general supervision of the Relocation Officer, performs a variety of responsible tasks necessary to locate decent, safe and sanitary housing for families and individuals who are to be relocated from the redevelopment project areas. Specific Duties 1. Familiarizes himself with overall housing needs of families and individuals in project areas and works in close cooperation with family assistants regarding specific needs of each family. 2. Secures listings on rental and sale property through the use of direct -5- advertising and through contacts with real estate firms, property owners and other community resources. 3. Maintains current file of listings for private rental and sale property. 4. Inspects units and certifies their suitability using established guides for making such certifications. 5. Screens family record files and pre - selects possible families on basis of rent paying ability and size of unit. 6. After consultation with Family Assistant or Relocation Officer, arranges for referral of family to existing vacancy. 7. Checks results of such referrals and keeps Relocation Officer informed as to results. 8. Keeps current listing on availability of and referral to low -rent public housing. 9. Inspects property owned by Housing Authority after units have been vacated, makes suggestions regarding the use of such units for temporary rehousing. 10. Makes certifications on units self - located by site occupants. 1 1 . Maintains necessary records and reports. 12. Performs other related duties as assigned. Clerk- Stenpgrapher Summary of Duties Under administrative supervision performs a variety of responsible and moderately difficult clerical tasks including use of typing and dictation skills and other related work as assigned. Specific Duties 1 . Receives, directs and gives information to callers and makes appointments when staff members are out. 2. Takes and transcribes dictation. Handles administrative clerical detail. May compose answers to routine letters. ` 3. Maintains various records; maintains numerical and subject files. Conducts c i -6- • 2) Condition of Dwelling Unit • The dwelling, whether an individual house or a unit in a multiple dwelling, must meet the following criteria: a) Permanent, safe and reasonably efficient kitchen facilities including sink with hot and cold running water and provisions for a cook stove. b) A flush toilet and a bath or shower in useable condition must be available for the exclusive use of each family. c) Potable running water must be available within the unit. d) Each unit in a multiple dwelling must have a sufficient number of exits to provide a safe means of reaching outdoors at ground level. e) Adequate electric lighting and safe wiring must be provided. f) Heating facilities must be safe and adequate. g) Living rooms, bedrooms and kitchens must have windows. (Windows opening into an air shaft shall not be considered as meeting standards). h) Toilets and bathrooms must have some means of ventilation. c. Occupancy Standards In making referral to a dwelling unit, the relocation staff will observe the following occupancy standards to insure that dwelling accommodations are in accordance with objective standards of health, sanitation and welfare. 1) Sufficient space must be available in relation to size and characteristics of the family so that it would be unnecessary for a family to occupy accommodations which would result in: a) Bedrooms being occupied by persons of the opposite sex, except married couples and children under six years of age. a IM • • b) The use of living rooms in one - bedroom units for sleeping space for more than one person. c) The regular use of living rooms in units larger than one bedroom units for sleeping purposes. 2) In observing the above standards, the following considerations shall be taken into account. a) The number of persons expected to occupy each bedroom shall be determined by the bedrooms capacity to provide for adequate furniture and healthful, comfortable sleeping arrangements. b) Every child will be considered a person, except that an infant under 18 months of age will not be counted as a person for occupancy standards. 3) The maximum occupancy limits are as follows: 0 -1 Bedrooms 3 persons .2 Bedrooms 5 persons 3 Bedrooms 7 persons 4 Bedrooms 9 persons 5 Bedrooms 12 persons Note: These occupancy standards may be varied provided there are special circumstances not normal to the average family and provided that such variance is approved by the Relocation Officer. An example of a situation in this circumstance would include the use of an enclosed heated porch for sleeping quarters in the case of an exceptionally large family. 2. Ability to Pay The following shall constitute the rent - income ratio and criteria for evaluating family ability to purchase housing. a . Tenants No family shall be required to accept referral to a dwelling unit if the rental charge for such unit exceeds 25% of the families monthly income. In applying the ratio, care and judgment must be exercised so that the individual needs and responsibilities of the family are considered. Some of the factors which must be taken into consideration are size of family, age of children, unusually high expenditures of income for medical treatment or care and excessive family debts. When any of these or other factors exist the family visitor will discuss the circumstances with the relocation officer and a fair and reasonable adjustment will be made. b. Home Buyers It will be the policy of the Rehousing Office to consider the following in the purchase of a home: 1) The cost of the house should not exceed 2 1/2 times the annual income. 2) When computing annual income, the income for all secondary wage earners should be evaluated. 3) Sporadic income of minor children or working wives generally will not be taken into account. 4) Income derived from working wives who are in the child- bearing years must be realistically evaluated. 5) The age of the purchaser shall be considered. 3. Location in Respect to Place of Employment In making referrals to dwelling accommodations, the relocation staff shall make certain that no family is forced to accept housing when said housing would necessitate the head of the family commuting an unreasonable - 10 - C: • distance to and from his place of employment and will be located in areas generally not less desirable in regard to available public utilities and commercial areas than the areas in which they currently reside. 4. Temporary Relocation It is not anticipated that temporary relocation will be needed during the relocation period. However, should such circumstance occur, it will be held to a minimum in both extent and duration. Temporary relocation is and will be avoided when possible. Any relocatee will be regarded as temporarily housed in any dwelling unit not following the occupancy standards outlined in this text (See exhibits following this text). Relocation responsibility will be continued and further offerings made until the family is rehoused in standard accommodations or the family refuses to accept suitable offerings. Families who self - relocate in substandard housing will be offered referrals to standard units. Standards for temporary housing will be based on health and safety objectives as previously outlined. Any temporary rehousing will not be less desirable in character than the dwellings vacated by the displaced families and will be in a safe and habitable condition. Temporary relocation does not diminish the obligations of the LPA with respect to permanent relocation. C. Proposals for Obtaining Relocation Housing. 1. Public housing is available in Minnesota. Continuing surveys are being made to locate existing vacancies within the City of St. Paul . A recent sample survey (See Appendix following this report) disclosed substantial standard vacant rental units. A file (multiple listing) is maintained of all houses for sale. "For Rent" listings are obtained from local newspapers, house -to -house calls, telephone calls and OL • • private and public appeals and contacts. Current files are maintained. Under recent legislation all dwelling units are now available to minority groups. (See Exhibit G, Minnesota State Act Against Dis- crimination). These were not previously attainable by them. In addition, where vacancies exist, landlords have been urged to rent to racial minorities. Income limits and minimum rent in public housing project for displaced families are based on yearly income for a particular family size. The requirements for those eligible for public housing are as follows: Maximum income limits for initial occupancy into public housing: Size of Family Yearly Income 1 Person $3,200 2 Persons $4,000 3 Persons $4,400 4 Persons $4,880 5 Persons $4,880 6 Persons $4,880 7 Persons $4,880 8 Persons or more $4,880 The families in the project area meeting these requirements are not only eligible for public housing but have priority over all other eligible families in the City of St. Paul for vacant and newly constructed public housing units. 2. The analysis of the rehousing needs of the families to be displaced from the Cathedral Area Urban Renewal Project indicates that there will not be a severe deficiency in the supply of existing housing during the relocation period (See Form H- 6122). No action, which is not already - 12 - • planned or in progress, is necessary in order to provide new housing for project families. Two other factors apparent in the St. Paul area will further ease the relocation situation for the Cathedral Area relocatees. a) The largest portion of Highway displacement throughouf the City of St. Paul has been completed. It is estimated that approximately 150 family relocations will be created by the City and State highway program during the relocation period of this project. b) Demolition in the Cathedral Area will proceed in three phases (See Figure 8, Sequence of Relocation). The first phase will begin from the " east boundary and remove the structures required for the construction limits of the Technical - Vocational School site. The area to the west of St. Joseph's Academy where the proposed reuse is medium density (221 (d) 3) housing as set forth in this text) will be the second phase of acquisition and demolition. The timing for the third phase of demolition will be such that its execution will follow the completion of the relocation housing construction (221 (d) 3 housing) in the western portion of the project area in the event that the Authority can dispose of land within the second phase for such residential use. These units will be available for the rehousing of those families in the central portion of the project area. Project displacees have priority over other families outside of the project area seeking housing in these units. The demolition of the project structures will then commence after the displacees have been relocated, either in the new structures in the project area or elsewhere in the city. This action is feasible since there will be little or no physical construction in the central portion of the area. Its use will be that of necessary parking and play area for the Technical- Vocational High School and open space for other institutional uses. d _R� i The relocation office will provide the necessary information to project area residents regarding the availability of FHA Section 221 Financing. In a special informational statement to families desiring to purchase homes, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority will advise these families of their eligibility for Section 221 Housing. Interested families will be referred to the proper institutions. (See Exhibit H, Tenant Selection Manual). 3. Only minor problems are expected to be encountered in the rehousing of minority groups of Project I displacees. In April, 1961, the Minnesota Legislature approved a state act against discrimination (See Exhibit G, Minnesota State Act Against Discrimination) . In Section 363.03 subdivision (12) of said act, it states: ".... It is an unfair practice: (1) For an owner, leasee, subleasee, assignee, or managing agent of, or other person having the right to sell, rent, or lease any real property, or any agent of any of these (2) to refuse to sell, rent, or lease or otherwise deny to or withhold from any person or group of persons any real property because of the race, color, creed, religion, or national origin of such person or group of persons ....... Public housing is available for the families in the project area. All eligible displacees have priority to relocate into vacant and /or newly constructed public housing units. These units are available to the aged, disabled, and families based on income and family size. The number of bedrooms required for each family will be determined, based upon consideration of the number of persons, ages, sex, health and other pertinent facts. Complete records will be maintained indicating the following facts before and after relocation: family composition and income, number of bedrooms, equity, and classification (standard or -14- • • substandard), gross housing costs, monthly payments and utility costs. Substandard quarters have not been nor will they be recommended. How- ever, some families may move into substandard units without notifying the relocation worker beforehand. Mihen inspection reveals that a self - located unit lacks any of the characteristics of a standard unit, the family will be encouraged to accept assistance in finding satisfactory accommodations. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (LPA) will continue to offer assistance until the family moves into a standard dwelling unit, or until the offer of further assistance is explicitly refused. In the latter case, the refusal will be documented and recorded on the respective family's relocation record. D. Relationship with Site Occupants 1 . The following contacts with site occupants will be made: a. A letter will be used to inform site occupants and owners of property in the contemplated project (See exhibits following this text). b. A 100 percent family survey has already been completed. (All properties in the project area will be acquired except St. Joseph's Academy, First Christian Church and two apartment buildings (31 dwelling units) compatible with the proposed land use.) Additional contacts of a more personal nature will be made with the families by the Relocation Staff. 2. The following services will be rendered to displaced families: a. A relocation office will be established within the project area. The hours to be maintained will be between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. b. Referrals to suitable private rentals will be given to families by the Family Assistant. Three rejections of such referrals shall be considered as refusal to accept suitable housing. -15- • • c. Applications for low -rent public housing will be taken by the Family Assistant and will be processed immediately by the Tenant Selection Interviewer. When it is determined that the family meets the requirements for low -rent public housing they will be offered the first available unit within their needs. d. Referral to sales housing will be made by the Family Assistant in a realistic manner, and where such assistance is needed, help will be sought for the family in obtaining mortgage financing. The City received certification for 221 financing; however, no units have been constructed. e. Self- relocated families will be visited after relocation and the dwelling unit will be inspected. If the dwelling unit fails to meet the criteria listed, further assistance will be offered to the family until such time as the family obtains standard housing or refuses further assistance. 3. Community Participation It is anticipated that as a result of the visits made by the relocation staff at the time of the survey, a climate of acdeptance and good will toward the Local Public Agency will have engendered in the community. A citizen's City -wide Relocation Advisory Committee is already in exist- ence and should the need arise the members of the committee are available for consultation with the relocation staff. Relocation will also be undertaken in conjunction with the Haley Brown Settlement House and the Capital Community Center, active community groups in the project area. Both groups will provide additional assistance in locating available housing. 4. Inspection of relocation housing will be conducted. The characteristics of a standard dwelling unit will be verbally explained to each family -16- • • by the relocation worker. In addition, a written description will be given the family during the first interview. (See exhibits following this text). Whenever possible, every self - located unit will be inspected by the relocation workers in advance of the move. If the unit does not meet the requirements for permanent relocation, the family will be encouraged to look for better housing. Aid and assistance in the form of referrals will be offered. If the unit is standard, a certification form will be prepared and the family will be considered to be permanently relocated by its own initiative. 5. Families that move without notifying the office of a new address will be kept as a continuing responsibility until they are located. The relocation worker will be required to keep a detailed record of all steps taken in attempting to locate them. Several measures in the relocation procedure will be designed to keep the number of lost families at a minimum. At the next interview the relocation worker will carefully explain the assistance available to families to be displaced and the resulting advantages of keeping in touch with the office. Names of friends or relatives outside the immediate family unit will be obtained wherever possible. Schools attended by the children will be recorded so that transfers can be checked. Basically, however, a good relationship, maintained by regular and fre- quent visits to the families, is the best means of avoiding this problem. Registered letters, showing the address where delivered, will be used when necessary to locate families who move without giving their new address. 6. Close liaison will be maintained with existing social agencies to provide social services to relocatees. -17- 0 0 7. Certification of eligible persons will be made under FHA Section 221 so that they can have the advantage of favorable financing available to them. E. Eviction Policy The policy of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of St. Paul in regard to forced eviction of residents who enter into a rental agreement with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority after the Authority has acquired title to the premises, shall be as follows: 1) Failure to pay rent according to terms of said agreement. 2) Maintenance of a nuisance or use of the premise for an illegal purpose. 3) A material breach of the rental agreement. 4) Refusal to admit a member of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to enter into a dwelling or upon a parcel acquired by the Authority. 5) Complete refusal to consider accommodations meeting the relocation standards set forth in this plan. 6) Situations requiring eviction under Minnesota law. F. Relocation Payments Program Relocation payments as provided for under Title I of the Housing Act will be paid to project displacees. Relocation Payment Schedule Estimated Number to Estimated Average Estimated Total Receive Payments Amount Payments Individuals 137 $ 10, $ 1,370 Individual Households 93 80 71440 Families 311 100 31,100 Business Concerns 1 2,000 2;000 Tota 1 $41-,910 (Note: Above table excludes 25 individuals and 26 families who will be relocated by the State of Minnesota. In the event these families are not relocated prior to the execution of the Loan and Grant Contract the responsibility for relocation will rest with the LPA) . • G. Services Provided Other Occupants • Individuals occupying separate housekeeping units will be offered the same relocation services as are offered families. Individuals not maintaining housekeeping units are not eligible for the services set forth in this relocation plan. However, the relocation office will attempt to locate standard housing facilities for these individuals in the event that extreme hardships or special problems are encountered. H. Other Requirements There are, to the knowledge of the LPA, no additional requirements imposed by the state or local law. -19- II . Estimates of Housing Needs and Resources The estimate for housing needs and resources are submitted on Form H -6122, Estimated Housing Requirements and Resources for Displaced Families. A. Project Area Requirements and Present Availability 1. Sources and basis for Estimates a. The following is an enumeration of the number, size, income, tenure and eligibility for low -rent public housing. (Blocks II and V, Form H -6122) . During the last four years there has been a turnover of 1,346 units in low rent public housing projects. This is an average of 336 units per year. Thus, for any one year period, 336 units, on the average, will be available for eligible families that will be displaced through urban renewal activity. A unit and bedroom count (of Minn. 1 -1, 1 -2, and 1 -3 public housing projects) developed in February, 1962, disclosed a total of 1,286 public housing units in existence in the City of St. , Paul. Of these 302 are efficiency or 1- bedroom units, 502 are 2- bedroom units, 348 are 3- bedroom units, 106 are 4- bedroom units and 28 are 5- bedroom units. In order to assign the turnover units a bedroom size, each of the total units in the bedroom classifications were reduced by a proportionate ratio until the total of 336 units was reached. (For example, the product of the 28 existing 5- bedroom units with the ratio of 336 units available each year to the 1,286 total units (28 x 336 divided by 1,286) equals the 7 units available for rehousing shown on Form H- 6122). A total of 110 families in the project area are eligible for these units (See Form H- 6122). The requirements in each bedroom classification are more than adequately satisfied for these families. The totaling of white and non -white families eligible for public housing follows. -20- 0 0 Form approved H -6122 Page 1 of 6 Budget Bureau No. 68— R926.4 (6-62) HOUSING AND HOME FINANCE AGENCY URBAN RENEWAL ADMINISTRATION ESTIMATED HOUSING REQUIREMENTS AND RESOURCES FOR DISPLACED FAMILIES PROJECT LOCALITY ST. PAUL MINNESOTA PROJECT NAME CATHEDRAL AREA PROJECT NUMBER MDT. R -25 INSTRUCTIONS: Place original and one copy in Binder No. 1, and one copy each in other binders. ESTIMATED LENGTH OF DISPLACEMENT PERIOD: --3L_ MOS. DATE OF SUBMISSION KAY 1, 1963 I. NUMBER OF FAMILIES IN PROJECT AREA AND NUMBER TO BE DISPLACED FAMILIES TOTAL WHITE NONWHITE a. Estimated number of families in project area 349 272 77 b. Estimated number to be displaced from property to be acquired by LPA 337 260 77 c. Estimated number to be displaced from property to be acquired by other public bodies - - d. Estimated number to be displaced by rehabilitation. conservation. or code enforcement activities.from property not to be acquired - - - II. CHARACTERISTICS OF FAMILIES TO BE DISPLACED FROM PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED BY LPA ESTIMATED NUMBER OF FAMILIES WHITE NONWHITE TOTAL ITENANTS OWNERS TOTAL TENANTS OWNERS a. TOTAL 260 177 83 77 53 24 b. Eligible for federally aided public housing 117 78 39 50 35 J 15 c. Eligible for State or locally aided public housing - - - - - - d. Ineligible for public housing 143 99 44 27 18 9 III. CHARACTERISTICS OF FAMILIES TO BE DISPLACED FROM PROPERTY_ TO BE.A000IRED BY OTHER PUBLIC BODIES WHITE NONWHITE ESTIMATED NUMBER OF FAMILIES TOTAL TENANTS OWNERS TOTAL TENANTS OWNERS a. TOTAL b. Eligible for federally aided public housing c. Eligible for State or locally aided public housing d. Ineligible for public housing IV. CHARACTERISTICS OF FAMILIES TO BE DISPLACED BY REHABILITATION, CONSERVATION, OR CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES. FROM PROPERTY NOT TO BE ACQUIRED ESTIMATED NUMBER OF FAMILIES WHITE NONWHITE TOTAL TENANTS OWNERS TOTAL TENANTS I OWNERS a. TOTAL b. Eligible for federally aided public housing NOT PPLIC LE) c. Eligible for State or locally aided public housing d. Ineligible for public housing V. PROPOSED REHOUSING OF FAMILIES INCLUDED IN BLOCKS II, III, and IV ABOVE PROPOSED REHOUSING WHITE NONWHITE TOTAL EXISTING UNITS NEW UNITS TOTAL EXISTING UNITS NEW UNITS a. TarAL FAMILIES 260 2846 743 77 2846 743 b. Private rental housing 96 2213 160 17 2346 160 c. Private sales housing 86 297 — 25 297 — d. Federally aided public housing 78 336 583 35 336 583 e. Other public housing 0' 0 0 Page 2 of 5 H-6122 (6-62) PROJECT NAME (✓A'j'Ijt+, RAL ARZA i PROJECT NUMBER MINN.- VI. SIZE AND BEDROOM REQUIREMENTS, BY INCOME, (In-elude all listed under 11, 111, and IV) OF FAMILI 3 TO BE DISPLACED FROM PROJECT AREA A. SIZE, BY INCOME, OF WHITE FAMILIES TO BE DISPLACED 011 PROJECT AREA MONTHLY FAMILY INCOME TOTAL NUMBER OF FAMILIES NUMBER OF FAMILIES BY FAMILY SIZE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 OR MORE Ta rAL 260 122 54 I 2 23 11 9 4 so - $49 3 3 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50 - $99 5 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 $100 - $149 12 29 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 $150 - $199 18 4 4 1 1 0 0 1 $200 - $249 22 11 3 3 4 1 0 0 0 $250 - $299 23 12 7 1 2 1 0 0 0 $300 - $349 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 $350 - $399 1 14 7 1 0 0 0 1 g $400 - $449 45 19 8 7 4 4 2 1 0 $450 - $499 9 5 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 $500 or more 68 22 16 6 10 4 5 2 3 B. BEDROOM REQUIREMENTS. BY INCOME. CF WHITE FAMILIES TO BE DISPLACED MONTHLY FAMILY INCOME TOTAL HUMBER OF FAMILIES BEDROOM REQUIREMENTS 1 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOMS 31BEDROOMS 4 BEDROOMS 5 OR ;MORE TarrAL 260 65 113 58 20 4 $0 - $49 3 1 2 0 0 0 $50 - $99 5 2 3 0 0 0 $100 - $149 12 6 6 0 0 0 $150 - $199 29 9 14 5 1 0 $200 - $249 22 7 9 6 0 0 $250 - $299 23 7 10 5 1 0 $300 - $349 �3 3 6 2 1 1 $350 - $399 31 6 17 6 2 0 $400 - $449 45 9 23 8 5 0 $450 - $499 9 2 4 3 0 0 $500 or sot. —t--68 13 19 23 10 3 I Draw a zigzag line differentiating eligible from ineligible families, by family size, for admissioi to pablic bossing. Page 8 of 5 8-6122 (6-62) PROJECT NAME CH ZI PROJECT NUMBER MINN. VI. SIZE AND BEDROOM REQUIREMENTS, BY INCOME, OF FAMILIES 70 BE DISPLACED FROM PROJECT AREA — Continued (Include all listed under II, III, and IY) C. SIZE, BY INCO21E. OF NONWHITE FAMILIES TO BE DISPLACED FROM PROJECT AREA MONTHLY FAMILY INCOME TOTAL'NUMBER OF FAMILIES NUMBER OF FAMILIES BY FAMILY SIZE 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 p OR MORE TOTAL 77. 17 14 12 9 5 7 7 6 $0 - $49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50 - $99 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 $100 - $149 6 4 2 0. 4 0 0 0 0 $150 - $199 9 2 2 2 1 0 1 1 0 $200 - $249 5 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 $250 - $299 11 2 1 3 2 0 1 1 1 $300 - $349 0 1 1 2 2 1 3 1 $350 - $399 7 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 $400 - $449 16 3 4 1 3 2 1 2 0 $450 - $499 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $SOD or more 10 2 2 2 10 1 0 2 1 1 D. BEDROOM REQUIREMENTS. BY INCOME. OF NONWHITE FAMILIES TO BE DISPLACED MONTHLY FAMILY INCOME TOTAL NUMBER OF FAMILIES BEDROOM REQUIREMENTS 1 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOMS 3 BEDROOMS 4 BEDROOMS 5 OR MORE TarAL 77 6 24 28 12 7 $0 - $49 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50 - $99 2 0 1 1 0 0 $100 - $149 6 1 4 1 0 0 $150 - $199 9 0 4 4 1 0 $200 - $249 5 1 1 3 0 0 $250 - $299 11 1 5 3 1 1 $300 - $349 11 0 1 4 3 3 $3SO - $399 7 1 1 2 2 1 $400 - $449 16 0 1 0 4 0 7 0 3 0 1 0 $450 - $499 $500 or more 10 1 3 3 2 1 1 Draw a zigzag line differentiating eligible from ineligible families, by family size, for admission to public Lousing. Page 4 of 5 H-6122 (6-62) PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER CATFMRAL AMA r r VII. ESTIMATED REHOUSING REQUIREMENTS AND AVAILABILITY A. NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED AND EXPECTED TO BE AVAILABLE DURING DISPLACEMMT PERICD TO WHITE FAMILIES 1 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOMS 3 BEDROOMS 4 BEDROOMS 5 OR MORE BEDROOMS TO-BE TO BE TO BE TO BE TO BE TYPE OF HOUSING RE- AVAILABLE RE- AVAILABLE RE- AVAILABLE RED AVAILABLE RE- AVAILABLE QUIRED QUIRED QUIRED QUIRED QUIRED EXIST- ING NEW EXIST- ING NEW EXIST NEW EXIST- NEW EXIST NEW ING ING ING 1. PUBLIC HOUSING 23 79 480 27 132 11 19 90 54 5 28 12 2 7 26 a. Federally aided 76 b. State or locally aided 2. STANDARD PRIVATE RENTAL HOUSING 36 1944 — 51 302 — 9 67 — 2 — — — — — TOTAL 98 Under $40 — 336 — 4 $40'- S49 582 H z w °[ $50 - $59 _ ]z3 _ _ 56 - - - p, - - - - - - - a s z aso - $ss 7 261 — 8 56 — 67 — — — — — — — — 7 $70 - $79 3 248 — 4 56 — — — — — — — — 0 — — a silo - $ss 4 89 — F 90 and over 22 202 — 28 134 — 9 - 3. STANDARD SALES HOUSING 6 27 — 35 101 — 30 109 — 13 47 — 2 13 — TOTAL 86 Under $5,000 0 0 - 1 0 - 0 0 - 0 1 - 0 0 - $5,000 - $5,999 1 0 - 5 6 - 1 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - $6.000 - $6.999 1 3 - 2 1 - 0 0 - 1 0 - 0 0 - M a $�,000 - $�.sss 0 2 _ 2 4 _ 1 2 — 0 0 — 0 0 — r $8.000 - $8.999 0 4 _ 2 5 _ 1 3 — 0 1 — 0 0 — N $9.000 - $9.999 0 2 — 0 2 — 0 10 — 0 1 — 0 1— 0 — $10,000 - $11.999 0 6 — 2 20 — 3 11 — 2 4 — 0 5 F Fsl2.000 and over 10 — 21 63 — 2� 83 — 10 2 8 — ^JCC '.C1vc;a�lorl nt;porL. n -EGG} • PAR. C. of % H-6122 (6-62) PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER CATiDRAL aR.N,A R -25 V11. ESTIMATED REHOUSING REQUIREMENTS AND AVAILABILITY—Continued B. NUMBM OF UNITS REQUIRED AND M[PECTED TO BE AVAILABLE DURING DISPLACEMENT PERICID TO NONWHITE FAMILIES 1 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOMS 9 BEDROOMS 4 BEDROOMS 5 OR MORE BEDROOMS TO BE TO BE TO BE TO BE TO BE TYPE OF HOUSING RE- AVAILABLE RE- AVAILABLE RE- AVAILABLE RE- AVAILABLE RE- AVAILABLE QUIRED QUIRED QUIRED QUIRED QUIRED EXIST- NEW EXIST- NEW EXIST- NEW EXIST- NEW EXIST- NEW ING ING ING ING ING 1. PUBLIC HOUSING a. Federally aided 34 1 79 480 10 132 11 15 90 54 5 28 12 3 7 26 b. State or - locally aided 2. STANDARD PRIVATE RENTAL HOUSING 3 1944 — 9 302 — 5 67 TOTAL 18 Under $40 — 336 — — — — — — — — — — — — — e u0 - $49 — 582 — — — — — — — — — — — — — F z a $50 - $59 - 123 - _ 56 $60 - $69 p 264 _ 3 56 — 0 67 — — — — — — — 0 2 2 $70 - $79 0 248 - 1 56 - 0 0 - - - - - - - 0 oc $80 - $89 1 1 89 _ 0 - - 01 0 - I - - I - - - - F$90 and over 2 202 - 5 134 - 5 0 - 3. STANDARD SALES HOUSING 2 27 — 5 101 — 8 109 — 6 47 — 4 13 — TOTAL 25 Under $5.000 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 1 - 0 0 - $5.000 - $5.999 0 0 - 0 6 - 1 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - $6.000 - $6.999 1 3 - 0 1 - 1 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - w U a $7.000 - $7.999 0 2 _ 2 4 _ 1 2 - 0 0 - 0 0 - $8.000 - $8.999 1 4 - p 5 - 1 3 - 0 1 - 0 0 - N $9.000 - $9.999 0 2 _ p 2 - 0 10 - 0 1 - 0 0 - $10.000 - $11.999 p 6 - 0 20 - 0 11 - 1 4 - 2 1 5 - $12.000 and over 0 10 — 3 63 — 4 83 — 5 40 — 2 8 — �.5ee Heiocation neiDort, x443 CFO 9 31 1 V0 0 0 Number of Bedrooms 1 2 3 4 5 Required Units (110) 24 37 34 10 5 Available Existing Units 79 132 90 28 7 Available New Units 480 11 54 12 26 In addition, a total of 583 public housing units are shown presently under construction. All of these units will be available for rehousing by January 1, 1964. The bedroom requirements and area in which they are located are listed below. The 0- bedroom (efficiency apartments) and 1- bedroom apartments are designed for elderly use. This totals an additional 480 units available for elderly Cathedral Area relocatees. The remaining 2, 3, 4, and 5- bedroom apartments total 103 units available (3 are designed for custodians) for the 110 displaced families eligible for public housing. The rehousing resources available for white families were applied to the non -white families. Total white and non -white families follows. -21 - Number of Bedrooms Public Housing Development 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 0 0 34 4 4 J. 5. McDonough (Minn. 1 -4) 71 72 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 8 22 Central Apartments (Minn. 1 -5) 100 99 0 1 0 0 Valley Apartments (Minn. 1 -6) 66 72 0 1 0 0 Neill Apartments (Minn. 1 -7) 0 0 10 6 0 0 Livingston and Curtice duplexes 237 243 11 54 12 26 The 0- bedroom (efficiency apartments) and 1- bedroom apartments are designed for elderly use. This totals an additional 480 units available for elderly Cathedral Area relocatees. The remaining 2, 3, 4, and 5- bedroom apartments total 103 units available (3 are designed for custodians) for the 110 displaced families eligible for public housing. The rehousing resources available for white families were applied to the non -white families. Total white and non -white families follows. -21 - Gross Monthly Rental $60 -$69 $70-$79 $80 -$89 $90 and over Total Sales Price Standard Private Rental Housing Number of Bedrooms 1 2 3 4 R E R E R E R E 7 264 11 56 - 67 - 3 248 5 56 - - - 5 89 11 - - - - 24 202 33 134 14 - 3* 39 1,944 60 302 14 67 3* Standard Sales Housing Number of Bedrooms 1 2 3 4 R E R E R E R E Under $5,000 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 $5,000 - $5,999 1 0 5 6 2 0 0 0 $6,000 - $6,999 2 3 2 1 1 0 1 0 $7,000 - $7,999 0 2 4 4 2 2 0 0 $8,000 - $8,999 1 4 2 5 2 3 0 1 $9,000 - $9,999 0 2 0 2 0 10 0 1 $10,000 - $12,000 0 6 2 20 3 11 . 3 4 $12,000 and over 4 10 24 63 28 83 15 40 Tota 1 8 27 40 101 38 109 1,9 47 R = Required Units E = Existing Units * The design of the sample survey found no 4- bedroom apartments. This type of housing does exist (as is evident in newspaper adds); little difficultyshovld ; be encountered in the rehousing of these three families. It is noticeable on the chart that there are at least two times as many resources in existance than is required in each bedroom category. -22 - 5 R E 5 R E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 4 8 6 13 • • There also exists 182 individuals that will be displaced. Of these 182, 83 are over 65 years of age and are eligible for low -rent public housing. This number of individual relocatees is approximately one -third of the total number to be displaced from the project area. Although there is no requirement to find rehousing for individuals, it is evident that at least one -third of the individuals will be able to relocate into public housing. b. The proposed rehousing information was developed from two main sources (Block V) . 1) Sale Housing A total number of available sales housing, broken down by number of bedrooms and sale price was compiled from the Multiple Listing Service of the City of St. Paul. This listing is a total compilation of all sale housing for all realtors in the Twin Cities area. Only those units within the city limits of St. Paul were compiled from this listing for rehousing resources and subsequently listed on Form H -6122. 2) Rental Housing A sample survey was conducted throughout the entire City of St. Paul to determine the rental housing units presently available. The design of this survey was such that it could be projected and provide an accurate indication of the total number of rental housing units, broken -down by rents and number of bedrooms for tabulation on Form H -6122 (See Appendix) . This information was found to favorably relate to the Housing Census of 1960. -23- • • c. The number, size, rent and price distribution of estimated housing resources was tabulated for all rehousing resources (Block VI) . This information was compiled as part of the sample survey for rental rehousing .(See Appendix) and noted from the multiple listings at the time the rehousing resources data was recorded. 2. Analysis of Rehousing Data The relocation staff concludes that existing housing resources are presently available, and hence, based on current turnover, these resources will be available during the displacement period to rehouse all of the project area families. The results of the sample survey and sale housing listing indicate that at the time of this submission there exist rental housing and sale housing in excess of the total requirements of relocatees by a minimum factor of three. A thorough analysis of the requirements in each rental and sales category indicates sufficient resources are available in each rental and sale category (or in the adjacent categories, e.g., in the $6,000- $6,999 sales housing category for 1- bedroom, 1 unit may be required but none found in the multiple listing; however, a 2 -unit may be available in the $5,000- $5,999 category.) These resources more than adequately satisfy the requirements for all displaced families. There are also 583 public housing units presently under construction and 160 units of 221 (d) 3 housing are expected to be constructed in the project area. The add- ition of these units - together with the satisfaction of meeting present requirements with existing housing - strongly indicates that only minor problems may arise during the relocation program. * With the exception of one family (presently owning) there are sufficient resources. Should it be impossible to locate a comparable sales home, the family will be required to rent in either private or public housing (as the family is eligible for public housing) . -24- • • Thirty of the structures in the Cathedral Area are within the Freeway right -of -way (See 10ap No. 1, Boundary Map). Within these structures there are 26 families and 25 individuals that will be displaced and relocated by the State Highway Relocation Office (included in the relocation estimate). These families, on the average, have two children and a yearly income of $4,355, with a median income of $5,000 per year. The majority of the individuals live in two story structures converted from a two family use to rooming houses. They are, in general, over 65 years old;, collecting Social Secuirity or a pension, and are of a low income bracket. All but two of the in- dividuals are white. Thus 7% of the relocation load will be under- taken by the Highway Department and not the LPA. (It should be noted, however, that the LPA will be respondible for the relocation of these families if they are not relocated prior to the execution of the Loan and Grant Contract) . 3. Rent- Income Ratios As standard policy to be followed in determining whether a particular dwelling unit is within the financial means of the displacees, the total purchase price should not exceed two and one -half times the gross annual income of the family; the monthly rent, including utilities, should not exceed twenty -five percent of the gross monthly income. These rent - income ratios were used to determine the ability of displaced families to pay. These ratios are based on averages developed statistically, using nation -wide data, and with only slight modification for geographical areas. A study of related household costs for ADC families by officials of welfare offices further supports the establishment of the ratio of rent and purchase price to income. -25 - • • 4. Competing Demands for Relocation Housing The City of St. Paul is in the midst of a highway construction program in conjunction with an overall proposed highway plan to be completed by 1980. The largest portion of the highway displacement has already been completed. During the next five years few major highway pro- grams are to be considered. These statements are based on a con- ference with the Housing Relocation Officer of the City of St. Paul who maintains continuous contact with the State Highway Relocation Officer. (It is estimated that there will be approximately 150 families relocated for highway purposes. Families displaced through housing code enforcement and Health Department restrictions will be minimal compared to Project I relocation and rehousing resources. No competing demand from this area is expected to hinder the relocation program. There will be 3,648 gross units available to the 337 families and 255 individuals that will be displaced. It is not anticipated that any competing demands will substantially effect the ability of the LPA to carry out relocation for this project in accordance with the Relocation Program. 5. Special Problems Few problems involving the rehousing of minority groups, low- income families, large families, handicapped or aged site occupants may be anticipated. Through new legislation, discussed previously, minority groups have been given equal opportunity in obtaining housing. Available public housing far overshadows the consumption demand of the -26 - C • eligible project area low- income families. A multiple listing of available sales housing and a sample survey which determined avail- able rental housing indicates a surplus of units available to large families. Handicapped or aged site occupants are either eligible for low -rent public housing (of which an adequate rehousing supply exists) or can afford private housing (of which an adequate supply also exists) . 6. Displacement of Individuals The 100% family characteristic and structural condition survey completed in February, 1963, reflected 197 individuals (exclusive of 73 women in the Catholic Guild Hall). Of this total, 182 are to be displaced (154 white and 28 non - white). Of the 182 individuals, 83 are over 65 and eligible for low -rent public housing. These individuals have priority over other persons desiring this type of housing. There is, in addition, another 41 individuals who are also eligible for public housing, based on their minimal income figures. Remaining are 58 individuals - 50 white and 8 non - white. The breakdown as for their ability to purchase housing or rent is as follows: Monthly Sales Rent White Non -White Housing White Non- Vyhite $60 -$69 2 2 Under $5,000 1 - $70 -$79 7 2 $5,000 - $5,999 2 - $80 -$89 5 0 $61000- $61999 1 - $90 and over 19 3 $7,000 - $7,999 1 - 34 7 $8,000- $8,999 2 - $9,000- $9,999 0 - $10,000- $111999 4 - $12,000 and over 5 1 16 1 -27 - • • The addition of these 58 units to the family requirements illustrated on Form H -6122 constitutes little or no problem. There are sufficient units available in the categories in which the requirements of these individuals fall and every effort will be made to assure these persons of adequate rehousing. The 73 women (white) in the Catholic Guild Hall are all working women (stenographers, nurses, lab technicians, teachers, etc.) with steady incomes. The sample survey indicated a preponderance of one bedroom units (which satisfy the needs of these women) in all monthly rental ranges. It is not expected that any of these young women will be eligible for public housing. 7. Financing Available to Non -White Families FHA financing under Section 221 is available to all those who quality, credit -wise, regardless of race. Conventional financing is also available to those who qualify credit -wise. B. Additional Construction No new private construction of dwelling units, to house displaced families, is required to meet the rehousing needs. However, construction of 221 (d) 3 housing is proposed for the western portion of the project area. This housing will be made available to displaced families in order to further facilitate ease in the relocating of project families. As was outlined in Section I of this text, the demolition of the project will be so timed (in the event the sponsoring agent is available) so as to allow families in the central portion of the area to relocate into the 221 Housing in the western portion of the project. Approximately 30% of the families in the project area will be able to utilize this rehousing resource in addition to the existing housing presently available in St. Paul. • APPENDIX • • • HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA M E M 0 DATE: October 4, 1962 TO: A11 Concerned FROM: Marshall D. Anderson SUBJ: Public Housing Construction The following outline describes our present public housing construction program, by projects, and indicates anticipated completion dates. This is being furnished in response to numerous inquiries from within and without our office and may assist you in answering some of these ques- tions: PROJECT 140. MINN. 1 -4 - ADDITION TO J. J. MCDONOUGH HOMES 9 two story row house buildings with the following unit types: 34 - 3 bedroom units 4 - 4 bedroom units 4 - 5 bedroom units Total 42 dwelling units Expected to be ready for occupancy about November 1, 1962. PROJECT NO. MINN. 1 -5 - CENTRAL APARTMENTS AND DUPLEX UNITS 1 six -sided hi -rise apartment building with 13 floors, lo- cated at Central Avenue and Kent Street. Unit distribution as follows: 1 - 2 bedroom unit for the custodian 71 - 0 bedroom units (efficiency units) 72 - 1 bedroom units Total - 144 dwelling units (Hi -rise) and 21 - 2 story duplex buildings with the following unit distribution: 12 - 3 bedroom units 8 - 4 bedroom units 22 - 5 bedroom units Total - 42 duplex dwelling units Available for occupancy in December of 1963+ b4lex units may be ready a few months earlier than the hi- rise, but the Contractor is under no obligation in this regard. 0 0 MEMO, continued Page two PROJECT NO. MINN. 1 -6 - VALLEY APARTMENTS This is an 11 story "L" shaped hi -rise building which is being constructed north of University Avenue in the Eastern Redevelopment Project. The building has the fol- lowing dwelling unit distribution: 1 - 100 - Total - 200 dwelling units 3 bedroom unit for the custodian 0 bedroom or efficiency dwelling units 1 bedroom units This building should be ready for occupancy by`June of 1963. PROJECT NO. MINN, 1 -7 - NEILL APARTMENTS AND WEST SIDE DUPLEXES This is a 6 -story (west wing) and 7 -story (east wing) "L" shaped hi -rise building which is being constructed on the north side of Laurel Avenue between Farrington and Virginia Streets. The unit distribution for this building is as follows: 1 - 3 bedroom unit for the custodian 66 - 0 bedroom or efficiency dwelling units 72 - 1 bedroom dwelling units Total - 139 dwelling units (hi -rise) The west side duplexes are located on Livingston and Curtice: 10 - 2 bedroom dwelling units 6 - 3 bedroom dwelling units Total - 16 dwelling units (duplex) Should be available for occupancy by December of 1963. 6 YEAR PERIOD UNIT TURNOVER - LOW INCOME HOUSING ESTATES -- MINN. 1 -1, 1 -2, and 1 -3 1 -1 1 -2 1 -3 Total 1957 155 90 0 = 245 1958 157 73 0 = 230 1959 149 118 66 = 333 1960 147 87 108 = 342 1961 139 96 100 = 335 1962 131 93 112 = 336 878 557 386 = 1,821 REHOUSING OFFICE 55 E. FIFTH'STREET • 0 HOUSING AMID RMEVMOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA INFORMATION NOTICE TO RESIDENTS TEL. NO. CA 7 -7524 The property which you now occupy is located within the Dunedin Terrace Housing Site. All of the buildings in this area will be purchased by the Saint Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority and will be demolished. It is the objective and obligation of the Local Housing and Redevelopment Authority to assist you in finding another home which is (1) safe, decent, and sanitary meet- ing all the requirements of applicable city codes, State and Federal laws, (2) within your ability to pay, and (3) reasonably located with regard to your place of employment. For this purpose, the Authority has established a Rehousing Office on Congress Avenue. The staff of this office will give you every possible assistance in finding suitable housing. However, you should begin immediately to look for a place to live. If you find one, notify the Rehousing Office of your new address. If you are unable to find a new location by the time clearance is scheduled, it may be necessary to offer you temporary living quarters. You will be required to pay rent for this temporary housing. The Rehousing Office will continue to assist you in finding permanent housing. Residents of the Urban Renewal Area who are eligible for low -rent, public housing will be given a preference. If your income is low, you may be eligible. The staff of the Rehousing Office will assist you in making application for public housing. You will be required to pay rent to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority after it takes possession of the house in which you live. If you fail to pay rent, you may be evicted. If you are evicted, you will lose all right to assistance from the Rehousing Office. However, you will not be evicted unless: (1) you fail to pay your rent, (2) you refuse to move when other standard housing is available to you, (3) you carry on any nuisance or unlawful activity in your home. You may be eligible for relocation payments to cover the cost of reasonable and necessary moving expenses and actual direct losses of property, for a family or individual provided; (1) you move from your residence after it was acquired by the Authority, (2) you make a claim which is approved by the Housing Authority thirty days after the date of moving, (3) you have Lived within the project boundaries three (3) months prior to displacement. The written conditions under which relocation payments will be made are available at the Rehousing Office located on Congress Avenue. Very truly yours, Clem H. Bowe Relocation Officer OFFICE HOURS: Mon. Through Friday 8,30 A,M. - 4:30 P.M. A r-I z s O 0 8 ppa fr1W ra ca O O\N\O O. z H r-4Mrm1NNN v Q 2 rn M. � O '� �N S 03 cu O H r-1 co O to H +- O\ N -t N (00 0 V'.00 r-1 M8r -INN U Q m rl rr�I�N�ON r-1 N M r-1 N r-1 0 H �lr4oO��N CU C\j f r-I cNV A � �p • 0ricAODCM f� ri N r-I U\ PG a a a w Fa as as al o O r1 N cn-t U) H • pa ON rl r-1 M 91 0 aW ►a o N • ON O 0 m rO-I O� O� rr-1 O N N N N N M M LC\ t!\ u1�p \D\0 N co CD CD o�O O O O goo op \O rO-i t--co MAN C�1 N r-1 r-l-1 D r�-I r�-I N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r-4 r1 r-1 9 N O� UN U* M U�\O �N \10 M \O. O\ O� f O O NLr\ r4 U\ O .:' N N O gN c+n\o r 4 M m 0 N N r-1 U\ O O M M MM U1 U\ -t -t ri o\O -t Lc\ E--\,D N t 00 O\ U\ \O r-1 +MOO '9OSO0.0. .000 00 .00 O N ONO r-1 N M-t U\\D LI -oo O\ O r-1 N cM.� U\\D f� ON O rl N Pi �N N NN NN N N N N McnMMMMMm m.�-. . Co oN0 rM-I O • O m c-- O N N N SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS S. O,too O . . . . . N ONON��Nokr NmNN01��rnorn�s koo com . . co ei w -% w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w r-1 r-i ri M-t .�. -t . U1 <` 00 n� U\ u1� \O ti m -- -t w w U\ \0 0 ! r-1 ri r-1 r1 r-1 r-1 rl N N C%l cm N d S S°0 SSSSS00 0 00°SSSSS0 m 0 .�Op.� .(�. gyp. . p c\ �S �D �CT� Oi93 N. lac\\ r4 cm N rl M u�.0 UN t r-1 rl N UN S SS°SOOOOSSSSSSS M r4 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 • • • . • • • .00 O N N cu \0 r-l-I \0 rO4 O O N� c�r1 N \D M,* rl UNF-1 ri N r4 CU r-1 N M w w N m fa- 0 OOSS OSS SSOSSOSSSSSO N rl 1 1 . . . . 1 . . . 1 . . . . . . . • tn-4 � c0 \D CD �� r-± O CO O �Nrl O M Off¢M 14c0 • . r-I O N cV 4rIIN w w N r-1 S S°o0°°SSSSS°OSSSS°0SS °°SS °O m NL— M M N 4 MAN M � U r1 lO --.Zt i�-CO rl r-1 ' N L`-N ri rl r-1 r♦ N r-1 r-1 r-i N N N M M o0 O N w w w r-1 M rl rO-I O� O� rr-1 O N N N N N M M LC\ t!\ u1�p \D\0 N co CD CD o�O O O O goo op \O rO-i t--co MAN C�1 N r-1 r-l-1 D r�-I r�-I N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r-4 r1 r-1 9 N O� UN U* M U�\O �N \10 M \O. O\ O� f O O NLr\ r4 U\ O .:' N N O gN c+n\o r 4 M m 0 N N r-1 U\ O O M M MM U1 U\ -t -t ri o\O -t Lc\ E--\,D N t 00 O\ U\ \O r-1 +MOO '9OSO0.0. .000 00 .00 O N ONO r-1 N M-t U\\D LI -oo O\ O r-1 N cM.� U\\D f� ON O rl N Pi �N N NN NN N N N N McnMMMMMm m.�-. . N N O O CQ U r-1 w r-I Cd A CU W r-I r--I O P4 a • • 880000 88080 0880 080 08800888888888800888000000000000000000 pp�... .. .. . .. . r-I ODD CY) rr I lO � � N U'� r-I O UN 00 t N� Lr N CO � . ON H � N M� t- t a\ N M UN w n w w w w w w w w n w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w n w w w w w w w w w w N t-OD r-I r-I N N M M-:t U\ L—OO OO O\O\ r♦ rl N M M U\L \kD kO Lam- L-- Ll- l-- lam- t- 0O CO OO OD (11 N N M CY) M M CO) M CY) M M M CY) MM� r-I -t .� -t .*.Z .:.* .:.:t :' -zf .f _:t --t .# .-J' -�t 8888888800008800 88808888080088008888 88888 .a�pppp. Ccpp .pp. .. .p. r.I c� r o. cy O\OL� L�r\ #� ti�� ON 00 �0N\D U�\L�� -OO�� O� cOYll� Oi iOr\oD L�u�\� --� OO L`-L\ El-CD.* N.:'\O ri N r-1 M r-1 M w w w r-1 N r1 00 00 8.8� 800 00 800 8.. 88 800 p 88.0. 0 O O 0 8 O O O CD O O O 0 p . _:t N .80 0000 00 U \ � � OM O N M t r \D - N - M LLrr\ � OD co N w r-I vr-I M M M M M M M M 00 , t r-I O N r1 OD ri M \O \O t U\ \p U\ r1 U\ M M .� \D M � U\� O ri U\ O O � O N rl O r1 M r-I 880000 88080 0880 080 08800888888888800888000000000000000000 pp�... .. .. . .. . r-I ODD CY) rr I lO � � N U'� r-I O UN 00 t N� Lr N CO � . ON H � N M� t- t a\ N M UN w n w w w w w w w w n w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w n w w w w w w w w w w N t-OD r-I r-I N N M M-:t U\ L—OO OO O\O\ r♦ rl N M M U\L \kD kO Lam- L-- Ll- l-- lam- t- 0O CO OO OD (11 N N M CY) M M CO) M CY) M M M CY) MM� r-I -t .� -t .*.Z .:.* .:.:t :' -zf .f _:t --t .# .-J' -�t 8888888800008800 88808888080088008888 88888 .a�pppp. Ccpp .pp. .. .p. r.I c� r o. cy O\OL� L�r\ #� ti�� ON 00 �0N\D U�\L�� -OO�� O� cOYll� Oi iOr\oD L�u�\� --� OO L`-L\ El-CD.* N.:'\O ri N r-1 M r-1 M w w w r-1 N r1 00 00 8.8� 800 00 800 8.. 88 800 p 88.0. 0 O O 0 8 O O O CD O O O 0 p . _:t N .80 0000 00 U \ � � OM O N M t r \D - r r N r M L UN - M L�- .� Lam- r-I M CO Cp� L LrrI l U\ O\ XCO r1 M M CT CU M N N r-I r-4 N M r-I N Cry LC\ M r-I N w r-I vr-I rra ter. .y} 80000800888000080000800088888000000 . . . . .\ �j .. . . . .. r Cam- O\ LC\ Lam- M M U\ U1 L O .� M CY' U\ O L` C4 c� O-* \1 tom!\ M N C M 888888 . . p. g O 8 M 08 00 0\ 0000000000000 1 5.pc8pp 8C.. 0QrH-I. p. CC) CO � \0 CY) -t 0 0 r0 cu U\ OO r-1 UN -.t N N N M r-i r f N N r-I r-I 88 0000 t NONM (m LC\ Lr\ ON M� H N N r-I r-I 8 r r-I r r r r t r r r O ti .y} 80000800888000080000800088888000000 . . . . .\ �j .. . . . .. r Cam- O\ LC\ Lam- M M U\ U1 L O .� M CY' U\ O L` C4 c� O-* \1 tom!\ M N C M 888888 . . p. g O 8 M 08 00 0\ ri M-d- 00 N M N r-1 M M C\i U\ . N MN .\ i N M N N N r-I cli O �I88888088888888888888885888888008888888 Co to O �Opp �Op\ pp ��pp ,,,yy� �ppp �p ,� CO co a\m\O\ 000000x0- lOrN- IiMIr4r-IIr�- Ir�Ir4r-IIC�NNNcu NcuN NCI cu C�l H ri ri r-I r-I ri r-I r-I r-I H r-I r-I r-i r-I r-i r1 rl r-1 rl rl ri H H r-I vr-I m O N M L`- O\ r N � O N L1 r- N.t O * � ai M t N Lr\rl U\ �r-i Nl C�h rl ri ri r- r-1 rI -I M 00 , t r-I O N r1 OD ri M \O \O t U\ \p U\ r1 U\ M M .� \D M � U\� O ri U\ O O � O N rl O r1 M r-I m CV N N NOLC \N - I-- t- '\DNN--triL\N r-I MON -zt *mNra0cm 0000000r-400 r-I r-I to W r; .:t O\ O 0 U\ C-- U\ M L�\O .d' H OD rl \'O .f U\\O -# CO N N U\� O m-* .d- r-I N M O O .:t O ri r-I �I88888088888888888888885888888008888888 M N GAD t O U v a\ r-I Fa .n w 0 A4 a� a • r-i L\ {E} • r-1 O\ b M Q � M0 800 00 8 00 00 8 8 00 8 00 00 8 00 8 00 8 8 0 8 8 8 8 0 0 8 00 8 00 800 00 N. pp.p�op0. .per. t .ppp�. ► oD O rr- IIOMOYL�bMD� � � UNur\\O\D�4 \00 k- - O0- O- 0 O\ 0 0 S �N • CC),, w G' \l w 011\1 w w ., w w w G* \l w w w w •w w w w w w w w •. w w w w w pp o r r Q g ° oo00 G\ • rn w O\ r-I 0 ° O O 0 C . O I 1 I r • t r r r r r r r • • o i l if r •° r r to M N \O C) ri r-1 r-I rN1 rl rl rrq r1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-i rl rl r-I rl r-1 r-I r-I r-I r I r-I r-I i--I rl r-d rl N tr\\O O CO t� Q O\ O\ O\ O O OM r-N000NOOO r-I 00000,-1rl000000 r-r- I000rI r4 fiO N �j NCO � ° ocv OOOOONOOO00000O0000000or 4r4000r4r-II Lr\ �'�-I rr4 �� r CO r r r r r r r r r r r� r� O r r r I r r r r� r M L \ r-I r; o or- it 40000000r -I000oor4OOOOOOOOoOOOO OI 0 CQ r4 try 88 O 0 r$ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r•° 0 ° °M° 0 r r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I w w Co r4 pp o r r Q g ° oo00 G\ • rn w O\ r-I 0 �ry N��N(�N(N(COj�C�ONt-Nt -L-E t- t- OD ODC(OC)C0000000[O CC) ODC0000CNOCO CM Cli N CrIl N N H 0 C) ri r-1 r-I rN1 rl rl rrq r1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-i rl rl r-I rl r-1 r-I r-I r-I r I r-I r-I i--I rl r-d rl U Q OM r-N000NOOO r-I 00000,-1rl000000 r-r- I000rI r4 fiO �j (rI rl ° ocv OOOOONOOO00000O0000000or 4r4000r4r-II Lr\ �� r r� r r r r r r r r r r r� r� r r r r I r r r r� r M cv r-I r; o or- it 40000000r -I000oor4OOOOOOOOoOOOO OI 0 CQ r4 try 0 CC) O w r4 r-I pp o r r Q g ° oo00 G\ • rn w O\ r-I 88888888888808808888888 .88$88888 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . • . . po oa�oa�o�o°`o S\a'�\�\OM\rn0 �\0%G\rnoO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`� o° °M° 0 r-1 r I rl 4 ri r-) 0 2 r-I r-I r-1 r-I H * * * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * 0 �ry N��N(�N(N(COj�C�ONt-Nt -L-E t- t- OD ODC(OC)C0000000[O CC) ODC0000CNOCO CM Cli N CrIl N N H C) ri r-1 r-I rN1 rl rl rrq r1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-i rl rl r-I rl r-1 r-I r-I r-I r I r-I r-I i--I rl r-d rl U Q OM r-N000NOOO r-I 00000,-1rl000000 r-r- I000rI r4 fiO �j (rI rl ocv OOOOONOOO00000O0000000or 4r4000r4r-II Lr\ M r� - m tcv O r- IOr 400000000000000r•1000000000000 OI 0 M W r; o or- it 40000000r -I000oor4OOOOOOOOoOOOO OI 0 CQ r4 try 88888888888808808888888 .88$88888 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . • . . po oa�oa�o�o°`o S\a'�\�\OM\rn0 �\0%G\rnoO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`� o° °M° 0 r-1 r I rl 4 ri r-) 0 2 r-I r-I r-1 r-I H * * * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * C- 0 H F D' aI W 0 V) z Ir W U Z 0 U A N I • • R. .0 O t+ U +1 00 q� 41 4) cd W ..� A +� c0 3, +) A H m odd cO d O aqf , D W • ,0� 1 0 m O r 1 ti c� � h rl U) O b a� L bb r{ � N C. Fq .1 r+ y afd r a r-i•r V1 r4 0 0 m o 7 co +1�� -i,� xo v o m � cc�,� Lei �e • yFa '�yy� m •° �' a� �h'� ? ° � C 4) 0 'D. + oer � 44 o 4 41 ;1 ° •r1 C O .Q .2 +� 44' V m .0 00 �V C mm y c0 •.+rC i .b . � W ce :. O • O aQ +1 ? O 44 O 44 .9 y 4J 4, O .'1 c) n N � 3 0 1v o 4H w c .)r 'd 4-) r_ a' m vw O a o GL .-1 G HO •r/ j H sb .� A 'O t0 P C Of +� U NN ° 0) r1 u .� O Cd +- P o r-4 9 aO G+ . t, rl .N mc'. C •-1 o O r4 r +j IS o +�3 �o •� r1 o w TI r1 1 w � +m ' '' .a i' ' N `9 +) x � l � 41 .44) p mf 4J . 0 0 0 V o •o mvw mo o 24.1 4-) A £ 4 0 m� V) (d U Wm tvON ra O it o m '� m y: Q. � >, � v o �, � .r♦ m �' � a m -d al '� a y, � � w o w r4 U 3 ct� moo "+ H • • p, H �' , +q�' +, .mOD 0 0 >4 W 1 U U� > r1 14 1 m r-1 2 y� 'C3 r-i +� H +l ct. O Y O cti.. �L� oa J d d W W Q 3 m z U � W 1 cn J i J Q x y 3 m z W � W h W El Q V J � a El 0 w 3 = w � � V O� r•d i Z O H �r4 In m M �o a o� 1 ;-s t , a t �w °O� � a O 0 0+•144 01 +a � � o Six fa •rl �O., U �momi �•1 C ce - a • O O : >Ob.8 PA O �I 0 0! � 41 W4 ri ri 449 O a� c �o� 14 ri • 004 m �0 N H 0 w W 4-) 'd cd O 2 n -r4 45 4 �..8 O 6 co ow c° IC 0.9 foA -ri m O 4�1 +3 Pt � 7g 3 m,o n +� x « 1014 rn o ? A a)m . C �. +-1 a 10 r-4 4k O 1 40 0'O je4 0 X90 +) 0' 19 -4 104 2 too 2a, Pit, 0 02 41� r. � ri cc •O rq r -4 4� 8 4J 44 to 10 O 0 r4 V q-4 0 O R+ 'r, O ) �i 0 tO w 0 m 4 0 �w 4 bo O ,a O �Q m a•o 0 a 9 z U 0 x C4 �yQ 4+ W [� • N H ell W4 o� 0 00 Q 010 0 �`oo � .,� S 0 b� � •ri .r+ �ntd 0�� o 4-4 0+� cr En D O C H rat �L O ��.� UHj r01 �J� x•�rm- 1.'.r�>i G C; 411 L m E . L, b�" ? E x y 100 Q� •O (D O 9 r-1 m •-i f. O IC v 0 r_4 H 0 +1 O 4-) CO � w • ori y G � O aa�f V m m �' CD 0 O Pe 4- i, '" SVz� n 2 to � cL �ao � �.� 2 -acv :.n - i -�o "�o OAm � �a c 5, 3� A 'J' •5 tD H m tH Q 0 cd w 1++ w y+ ,O•+ r�- i� •ri .�c �-f �y� +� O ] O GL C • 3 41-4 CC 0 +1 it C] .O � yp► ��" � � 'CO3 ri G-i � W y „�j ,� w m 4d rl += �� O-� x m� tD O + b aD'S O O4+ cc Zdj 0.0 z�,.1 M 4 .0 aim • • 131101 ON Z W A QQ H1VD ON m W � O U 0321 b'HS 13-1101 W < J W w x < N 03HVHS In HIVEI }a z0 J U 0 F z w 0 0 I O30MOH0 --H3A0 a OHVONVIS •NVIS '8f15 In J u< p W w C (a� O� 0 a •H•H •ONI IL N J F. 0 �� 1NVN31 w° pz z <a H3NMO wz x N z K LL +(I 0 } J_ � W IL z L 9 s a O N w N E UI 1 D M L ' w < Z '" 1 d a 3 s by b b 8b1 x a 0 'H'd •9113 NVW3OIAH3S J N 'A'030 /'13A G N N 7m LL a z a 7m IL rx- O b 311HM -JON I N N G N N N N I N N N G N ION U Y n g E J N l7 W 3 HOW HO DOSS w 66 VS -OS DS W i p U - 611VS -OOVS O 0 z I 1 J W Z O H_ W N N 66ES--OSES 6VES -GOES 66ES -OSZS 7 -ON SITE 9 - EQUITY 10- PAYMENTOR RENT 11 - RELOCATION NEEDS '•� 3003 3W VN - 0 �,. W U O a 05 V < ° 0 ¢ 6►ZS -OOZS m -DL L9 < OL -Z9 N 'd V"I I0 I W 131101 ON Z W A O NwN H1VD ON W � O U 0321 b'HS 13-1101 1- N W U < N 03HVHS In HIVEI }a z0 J U 0 F z w 0 0 I O30MOH0 --H3A0 a OHVONVIS •NVIS '8f15 In J u< H3WOOH W w C (a� O� 0 a •H•H •ONI IL N J F. 0 �� 1NVN31 w° pz z <a H3NMO wz x N z K LL +(I 0 } J_ � W IL z L 9 s a O N w N E UI D w < Z W w LL 3 x W ¢ 1 •H•d '9113N1 x a 'H'd •9113 NVW3OIAH3S J N 'A'030 /'13A U< O N N W 311HM -JON I a 0 < w 1 ir W F U 311HM •1HOd3H ION O g E J N l7 W 3 HOW HO DOSS w 66 VS -OS DS W i p U - 611VS -OOVS O 0 z I 1 J W Z O H_ W N N 66ES--OSES 6VES -GOES 66ES -OSZS 3 x 1� �,. W U O a 05 V < ° 0 ¢ 6►ZS -OOZS OOZS H30N11 -DL L9 < OL -Z9 N I W F$ a x ym, N O 6 J ° J u 7 0 < 9 O < x o I z ^� O F 5 L 0 F 9 S z f F< U1 rc Y U -wi J F E O IL � I Z IL I I w y < 1 g •dS10 'AM9H = 0 IX Z 'NNIW U) F U z O U UtI F- W z W O O U w F < 0 FJZ Z} �a N O a W W x w k w In z w zg z8 0 3i Si LLuai F < U O J W I 2< Q CL Ln Z Q W O � Ol U w 2 LL O } O x Q d z W 6� Z F w o H CL O w w C Q I :3 z ¢ 1 H w ! � rc 2 < F Ef W W NR W U N In }a a p UZI In J u< W W w �O (a� O� mg IL �� wi w° pz z <a wz 0 IL z TI- L Q CL Ln Z Q W O � Ol U w 2 LL O } O x Q d z W 6� Z F w o H CL O w w C Q I :3 z ¢ 1 H w ! � rc 2 < F Ef W W NR 0 0 sa3H.LO O31OIA3 LSO-1 snrovvs NOONVBV SNIOtlal F F < W W O H W Z Z < z z 1LLI3 dO lnO 4 031V3O13a J N O w N N W I W W Z {� y y U 9 < U 9 W Z�.1 O3aa333a w `JNISflOFI < 9NISnOH < F o o o LL I o U I m Z Z U� 1tl1N3a U 1N3 0 K I IY & & < < z S ssol K 83dOad I I I I y p z � y U ��y F U < <� < m W 'dX3 'AOW - 83nla u - 'Oa3H3 0 u a o o x g { x 0 0 i i w w p p '� z �7 «i .-1 00103 U UU) ' 3 w w J J w w ? ? ? {W� ' y w w y 3 � Natld "73ZVH � _ o Q * o F F Y Y 2 2 > U i >>p K K w w t to ONV1Fi�JIH Q Z < z z Z L'M -3WOH Z 3noa9 -'3VW Q ')4d WVIa83W O AtlM01W I _V'S- A I U 1tla1N33'ON 'VHd -3NAYci '9f1O0 1NI 111H NVeanens 3anionals z f Z w O O � �ti cz H.LVe ON Z HlVS 3aVHS z Hltle 'AIHd F F U U W < F W 0 1311O1.ON o - Vm*-IO1'HS E '1 O ON'1O1'HS U U J Z Z w O w 2 2 Z O '1 ON'1O1'ad z F 0 0. < F z 1H911'OVNI j j W W Z Z O O a a 3 W '.N3A'OVNI = 030MOHO 1 - 0 I < 1- o O = a OaVONV1S - 0 F F t F 'NVls'ens L LL 0 ly - } 0 [-. J a3AO ONV ? O [ [L .,<. 0 0 y 666' { {S O w O uyi J O < ,O a o 666'65-000'6S r a o 0. > w W O p > O 666'95- 000'9S N N w w W W C p p < 666'LS 00'LS = I p p 0 m mK p 666'95- 000'95 7 7 N N ' Z= t O 666'SS -OOO'SS m ODO'SS a3ONn c cn Z U 0 S 'OdNI ON U a3A0 y CINV 06S a yW{ W 444177 S fi S-OQS O O F FO 4 S U 0 W z O U) I • A COMMENT ON ESTIMATES OF VACANCIES (Leo J. Shapiro and Associates) Estimates and Vacancies are needed to make a judgement of the likelihood of re- housing families in existing standard housing in the city as they are displaced at various intervals as the renewal program is executed. Estimates of vacancies provide useful information for assessing rehousing requirements, but are severely limited as a measure of available housing. Concept of vacancy is imperfect The number of units available for rent or sale is understated by counting vacancies. Many occupied units may be available for rent or sale. Some units, for example, whose occupants are searching for a tenant or buyer are advertised in newspaper want ads, and in real estate listings. By contrast, some unoccupied units are not available for occupancy or their avail- ability is uncertain. This tends to be related to the total demand for housing. For example, during the housing shortage of World War 2, vacancy rates tended to sharply overstate available housing because many unoccupied units were kept off the market for periods of time. Measures of vacancy subject to error Vacancies tend to be a changing and elusive statistic. The number of units vacant changes during the course of the year because of leasing practices, temporary seasonal vacancies, and for other reasons. Finding an apartment is usually easier at some than at other times during the year. Usually, the number of vacancies in relation to the total housing inventory is small. Sampling and other sources of variability tend to have a larger relative effect on attributes i.e. vacancies which represent a very small proportion of the total population i.e. housing units. New construction projects, urban redevelopment and other ways in which action is • taken to change housing, may add further to variability of estimates from samples. Measurements of vacancies A common and simple approach to making a judgement about the number of vacancies is to review want ads, real estate listing or do windshield surveys of "for rent" signs. In this way it is possible to approximate how far the currently advertised vacancies go to satisfy the proposed rehousing needs. This same approach was also used in St. Paul to provide the planners with a quick perspective and early background information. After this preliminary view was taken, a full scale survey was planned in order to develop the estimates of vacancies for the proposed plan. These estimates are based on a sample enumeration in which 2400 St. Paul housing units selected by probability methods were surveyed. These survey data provide two basic kinds of information. (1) An estimate of the number of vacant units in St. Paul "today" (March, 1963) and of their characteristics; and, (2) evidence toward determining what the chances are of anyone finding vacant units simply by visiting structures in samples of city blocks. What the estimate of total vacancies means Although 2,400 housing units were surveyed, the number of vacancies enumerated is small, 82. While this sample provides the best estimate available, it should be pointed out that the particular value is subject to considerable variability. But, even if the over 100,000 housing units in St. Paul-had been enumerated and complete count of vacancies obtained, that value would most likely be changed today owing to the on- going and likely irregular changes in the number of units occupied and not occupied. Such changes over time may actually exceed the variability from survey sampling. Given these limitations, what can be concluded from the particular value of the estimate obtained? -2- • Essentially, there has been no startling change in the available housing supply since 1960. Changes in vacancies that was observed points to a decline in vacancies since 1960. The current estimate is about 25% below vacancies reported in the Census for 1960. The highest probability is therefore that no increase in available housing has occurred since 1960, and that a substantial share of the vacancy supply observed then remains today. Chances of finding a vacancy just by looking The need for rehousing families occurs as they are displaced over a period of time. This makes for the practical problem of being able to find housing at any point in time for varying numbers of families. This survey experience provides a good clue as to how much work is required to locate vacant units among the total housing inventory. About 100 man hours were required to locate 78 vacant housing units by visiting structures in blocks selected proportionate to their vacancies in 1960. Sixty eight of these vacancies were standard. This suggests a probability of locating a figure of app- roximately one vacancy per field hour if blocks are selected and units enumerated as they were done in this survey. Assuming even sharp changes in available vacancies, the experience suggests that it is feasible to find the vacancies needed by simply gauging the field hours spent enumerating housing units to the current vacancy supply. For example, given the current experience it may be possible to find the 349 vacancies needed to rehouse the proposed displacements in 350 field hours. It is possible to test the ability to find vacancies at various points during the program. -3- • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Item 1 - Project Expenditures 1 . Site Clearance • a. Removal of Existing Street Improvements 1) Pavement 2) Curb and Gutter 3) Sidewalk 4) Grading b. Removal or Abandonment of Existing Utility 1) Water Mains a) Water Mains Within Project Area b) Water Mains Outside Project Area 2) Combination Sewer 3) Lighting c. Structure Clearance 1) Demolition of Structures 2) Water Service Shut -Offs at Structures to be Demolished 3) Sanitary Sewer Service Plugging at Structures to be Demolished d. Private Utilities e. Summary Sheet 2. Site Improvements (100% Credit) a. Interior Street Construction 1) Street resurfacing 2) New construction a) Pavement b) Curb and Gutter c) Sidewalk • b. Lighting TABLE OF CONTENTS (car't) 1) Relocation and Conversion 2) Conversion c. Storm Sewer d. Summary Sheet -2- • I. Site Clearance • All existing site improvement removals or abandonments, unless otherwise noted, lie entirely within the project area and are necessary to carry out the urban renewal objectives in accordance with the Urban Renewal Plan. The local funds used for this project will not be derived from assessments to private property owners. a. Existing street improvements, in the proposed vacated rights -of -way, (ex- cluding those located in the proposed Technical - Vocational High School Site) will be removed or abandoned (in place) by the Local Public Agency. All existing street improvements within the Technical - Vocational High School Site will be removed or abandoned by the City of Saint Paul (the St. Paul School Board). (See Map No. 8, Existing Rights -of -Way for extent of street vacations in Project 1 .) Existing street improvements requiring removal or abandonment include, pavement, curb and gutter, and sidewalk. Upon removal, finish - grading will be required to return the area to a reusable state. The unit costs for the removal work have been obtained from a schedule of current prices used by the City of Saint Paul in their present contract - letting operations. These have subsequently been confirmed and /or modified by engineering representatives from the Street Department. 1) Pavement Removal (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way.) Information available from the City of St. Paul Street Department indicates that none of the street pavements, that are proposed for removal, have a concrete base, as do many of the streets in the city. The bases, while of undeterminable composition, are con- sidered as gravel and stone for the sake of this cost estimate. The visible surfacing consists cf brick, asphalt, or both. The unit cost indicated for removal of pavement includes the removal from the site of all surface and base material. -3 - • • 2) Curb and Gutter Removal Street From To Lineal Feet Carroll Arundel 200' East 400 Iglehart Arundel Western 1,200 Iglehart Western Virginia 620 Virginia Ig lehart Carroll 560 Farrington Marshall Marshall PI. 200 Tota 1 2,980 The cost estimate for curb and gutter removal is $0.50 per lineal foot 2,980 lineal feet @ $0.50/ lineal foot $ 1,490 Contingencies - 10% = 149 Engineering and Inspection - 10% = 149 Total cost of curb and gutter removal = $ 1,788 -4- Length Street From To x Width Square Feet Square Yards Virginia Iglehart Carroll 280 x 32 8,960 Carroll Arundel 200' East 200 x 30 6,000 Iglehart Arundel Western 600 x 30 18,000 Iglehart Western Virginia 310 x 30 9,300 Marshall Pl. Virginia Farrington 330 x 16 5,280 Marshall Pl. Forri ngton 120' East 120 x 16 1,920 Farrington Marshall Marshall P1.100 x 32 3,200 Total 521660 5,851 The cost estimate for pavement removal, including base, is $1 .50 per square yard 851 Square Yards @ $1.50 /square yard - $ 8,777 Contingencies - 10% - 878 Engineering and Inspection-40% -- 878 Total cost of pavement - $ 10,533 2) Curb and Gutter Removal Street From To Lineal Feet Carroll Arundel 200' East 400 Iglehart Arundel Western 1,200 Iglehart Western Virginia 620 Virginia Ig lehart Carroll 560 Farrington Marshall Marshall PI. 200 Tota 1 2,980 The cost estimate for curb and gutter removal is $0.50 per lineal foot 2,980 lineal feet @ $0.50/ lineal foot $ 1,490 Contingencies - 10% = 149 Engineering and Inspection - 10% = 149 Total cost of curb and gutter removal = $ 1,788 -4- • • 4) Grading (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way) 3) Sidewalk (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way) Square Street From To x Width Length Square Street From To x Width Feet Virginia Iglehart Carroll 560 x 4 2,240 Carroll Arundel 200' East 400 x 4 1,600 Iglehart Arundel Western 1,200 x 4 4,800 Iglehart Western Virginia 620 x 4 2,480 Farrington Marshall Marshall PI. 200 x 4 800 _ $ 5,844 Total 11,920 The cost estimate for removal of 4" thick concrete sidewalk is $0.50 per square yard Total cost for finish -grading 1,324 square yards @ $0.50 /sq . yd. - $ 662 Contingencies - 10% = 66 Engineering and Inspection - 10% - 66 Total cost of sidewalk removal - $ 794 4) Grading (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way) -5 - Length Square Street From To x Width Feet Marshall PI. Virginia 120' East 450 x 30 13,500 of Farrington. Carroll Arundel 200' East 200 x 60 12,000 Farrington Marshall Marshall PI. 100 x 66 6,600 Iglehart Arundel Virginia 910 x 60 54,600 Virginia Iglehart Carroll 280 x 66 18,480 Total 105,180 The cost estimate for finish - grading is $0.50/per square yard 11, 687 square yards @ $0.50 /sq . yd. _ $ 5,844 Contingencies - 10% = 584 Engineering and Inspections - 10% 584 Total cost for finish -grading = $ 7,012 -5 - C CJ b. Existing utility removal or abandonment. City owned utilities, that are located outside of the Technical - Vocational High School School Site, will be abandoned (in place) by the Local Public Agency; those within the Technical - Vocational High School Site will be abandoned (in place) by the St. Paul School Board (the City of St. Paul). i All existing fire hydrants, street lighting and related facilities presently owned by the city, and proposed for abandonment will be retained by the city and utilized in other areas of the project. The existing facilities have no value to the city except for relocation to match adjacent facilities. The existing utilities owned by the city include water mairis, sanitary and storm sewers, and street lighting. Utilities abandoned in place will be plugged or capped in accordance with City of St. Paul standards. See Map Nos. 10, 11, and 13, Proposed Sanitary Sewer System, Proposed Storm Sewer System and Proposed Water System for the location and extent of utility abandon- ments in the project area. The unit costs for the removal or abandonment work has been obtained from a schedule of current prices, used by the City of St. Paul in their present contract letting operations, and includes restoration of Site after all ex- cavations. 1) Watermains (See Map No. 13, Proposed Watermains) Discussions with the city water department engineers revealed that due to age and expected deterioration of the existing watermains, (including all values) the most appropriate method of vacating the proposed watermains would be to cap the main, remove the hydrants, and abandon the main in place. a) Watermain within project S -W 0 0 No. of W.M. Number of Street From To Caps Hydrant Removals Igl.ehart Arundel Western 2 1 Marshall Pl. Farrington 120° East I 1 Farrington Marshall Marshall PI. 1 0 The cost estimate for hydrant removal is $50 /hydrant. 2 hydrants @ $50/hydrant - $ 100 Contingencies - 10% = 10 Engineering and Inspection - 10% = 10 The total cost of hydrant removal = $ 120 The cost estimate for watermain capping is $20 0/cap 4 caps @ $200 /cap = $ 800 Contingencies - 10% - 80 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 80 Total cost for watermain capping = $ 960 b) The following watermains are entirely outside the project area, however, their abandonment is necessitated exclusively by the project objectives. On this basis a project credit of 100% is claimed. The cost estimate for hydrant removal is $50 /hydrant. 3 hydrants @ $50 /hyd . - $ 150 Contingencies - 10% = 15 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 15 Total hydrant removal cost $ 180 -7- Number of Hydrants to be removed 0 0 3 3 Number of Street From To Watermain caps Farrington Carroll Rondo 2 Louis Carroll Rondo 2 Carroll Farrington Cathedral PI. 2 6 The cost estimate for hydrant removal is $50 /hydrant. 3 hydrants @ $50 /hyd . - $ 150 Contingencies - 10% = 15 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 15 Total hydrant removal cost $ 180 -7- Number of Hydrants to be removed 0 0 3 3 • • The cost estimate for watermain capping is $200 /cap. 6 caps @ $20 0/cap = $1, 200 Contingencies - 10% - 120 Engineering and Inspection - 10% = 120 Total cost for watermain capping is $ 1,440 The cost estimate for removing a catchbasin is $10 /catchbasin 10 catchbasins @ $10 /C.B. - 2) Combination Sewer (See Map No. 10, Proposed Sanitary Sewer) Street From To M.H. C . B . Plugs Iglehart Arundel Virginia 5 3 4 Virginia Marshall Iglehart 2 1 2 Western Marshall Iglehart - 4 - Virginia Iglehart Carroll 1 2 2 8 10 8 The cost estimate for removing a manhole is $15 /manhole 8 manholes @ $15 /manhole - $ 120 Contingencies - 10% - 12 Engineering and Inspection - 10% - 12 Total cost of Manhole removal - $ 144 The cost estimate for removing a catchbasin is $10 /catchbasin 10 catchbasins @ $10 /C.B. - $ 100 Contingencies - 10% - 10 Engineering and Inspection -10% = 10 Total cost of Catchbasin . removal = $ 120 The cost estimate for plugging a sewer pipe is $2 /plug 8 plugs @ $2 /plug = $ 16 Contingencies - 10% = 2 Engineering and Inspection - 10% = 2 Total cost for sewer plugging - $ 20 • • 3) Lighting (See Map No. 15, Proposed Street Lighting) Discussions with the City Lighting Engineer revealed that the existing city owned buried conduits, containing feeder lines for the street lights, would have little value if salvaged. It was suggested that they be abandoned in place. The light poles will be removed and salvaged for relocation in other parts of the project. The unit removal cost includes the contingencies of circuits disrupted by the removal of poles, if these circuits are required for other lighting facilities within the area. If the circuit is not required for adjacent facilities, the conduit will be capped and abandoned in place. Poles to be Street From To Removed Carroll Arundel 200' East 2 Iglehart Arundel Western 6 Iglehart Western Virginia 4 Virginia Iglehart Carroll 1 11 The cost estimate for removal of light pole and base, capping underground conduit and abandoning cable is $20 /pole. 11 Poles @ $20 /pole _ $ 220 Contingencies - 10% - 22 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 22 Total cost of light pole removal $ 264 c. Structure Clearance.. . Due to existing structure conditions and project development plans, the entire project area, with the exception of St. Josephs' Academy, First Christian Church, and two apartments, located at the North East corner of Arundel and Marshall, has been designated for clearance and redevelopment. There • is a total of 243 principle structures wholly within the project area and 65 secondary structures attached or detached thereto. The cost of demolition was obtained from the City of St. Paul, and was based on the LPA engin- eer's estimate and bid prices on similar clearance projects in the St. Paul area. 1) Demolition at structures (See Map No. 1, Boundary Map) The cost estimates for demolition of existing structures are: 1 -story frame - $0.12 /sq . ft. 1 -story brick - $0.271/sq . ft. 2 -story frame - $0.27/sq . ft. 2 -story brick - $0.60 /sq . ft. 3 -story frame - $0.525/sq. ft. 3 -story brick - $0.80 /sq. ft. Secondary buildings - $25 /structure Unit cost includes back filling structure, basement @ $.75 /sq. ft. Average basement depth considered as 8' The average height of the first story at all structures was calculated as 15 feet and 10 feet for each additional story unless otherwise noted on Sanborn Maps. Structure Type Number Total Sq. Ft. Cost Sq. Ft. Total Cost 1 -Story Frame 21 15,415 $0.27 $ 4,162 2 -Story Frame 200 199,650 $0.525 104,816 3 -Story Frame 7 10,840 $0.95 10,298 1 -Story Brick 1 1,750 $0.45 788 2 -Story Brick 6 13,355 $0.60 8,013 3 -Story Brick 5 22,925 $0.80 18,340 Tota Is 240 263,935 146,417 An additional 65 structures @ $25 /structure = $1,625 A total of 74, 079 square feet @ 4' depth = 296, 316 cubic feet or 10, 975 cubic yards will be required for sand fill utilifed for basement back filling outside the Technical - Vocational High School Site. Those demolished structures within the Technical -10- Vocational High School Site will be filled with waste material obtained from the High School excavations. The cost estimate for sand backfill is $2.7 %ubic yard. 10,975 cubic yards @ $2.7 %u . yd . =;:$29,632 The total demolition cost for structures within the project = $177,674 2) Water Service shut -off (See Map No. 1, Boundary Map.) The water department engineers indicate that it would be advatitageous to plug only the services which are located on watermains which will remain in service. The plugging of the mains on those lines that are to be abandoned will serve to discontinue service to the demolished structures. The services located on the proposed active mains will - be plugged with a mechanical expansion plug at the main, after removal of the corporation cock. This method of plugging will elim- inate possible future leaks in the long service line serving the structures on the side of the street opposite the main. The total demolished struc- tures requiring water service shut -off equals 50. The unit cost for water service shut -off is $100 /plug. 50 plugs @ $100 /plug $5,000 The contingency consideration has been included in the unit cost. 3) Sanitary Sewer Service See Map No. (1) Boundary Map Discussions with city sewer engineers indicate that it would be advan- tageous to plug sanitary sewer services at their junction with the main sewer line. This plugging will prevent future surface water back -up as well as rodent infiltration. The total demolished structures re- quiring sanitary sewer service plugging equals 245. The unit cost for plugging sanitary sewer services is $50 per plug. 0 9 245 plugs @ $50 /plug $12,250 The contingency consideration has been included in the unit cost. d. Private Utilities Telephone lines, gas mains, and those electric lines owned by Northern State Power Company are shown on Map No. 17, Existing Telephone Lines, Map No. 16, Existing Gas System, and Map No. 14, Existing Electricity, respectively. Public utilities in vacated streets will be the responsibility of the respective owners. In the case of the electric facilities jointly owned by the City of St. Paul and Northern States Power Company, ownership of the respective parts of the facility will be retained by the respective owners, following abandon- ment or partial dismantling. Discussions with the respective utility companies indicate their acceptance of the proposals incorporated in this Plan. -12- 0 0 SUMMARY SHEET ITEM 1 - PROJECT EXPENDITURES Project Site Clearance Pavement Curb and Gutter Sidewalk Grading Watermains Combination Sewer Lighting Demolition of Structures Water Service Shut -Off at Structures to be Demolished $10,533 1,788 794 7,012 2, 700 284 264 177,674 5,000 Sanitary Sewer Service Cappi ngs at Structures to be Demolished 12,250 Subtotal $ 218,299 • 2. Site Improvements a. Interior Street Construction 1) Street resurfacing • Street resurfacing will be carried out on the streets within the project area which, due to present conditions, are considered to be deteriorated to the point of being a detriment: to local traffic. The resurfacing will consist of a 1 1/2" asphalt lift, feathered at the outside edges to meet the exist- ing gutter flow lines. This work is in accord with the City of St. Paul specification and lies entirely within the project area. Street From To Length x Width Square Feet Western Marshal I Iglehart 500 x 40 20,000 Western Iglehart Carroll 320 x 40 12,800 Virginia Marshall Cul -de -sac 340 x 32 10,880 Total 43,680 The cost estimate for asphalt resurfacing is $14 /ton, in place, including seal and tack costs. One ton Type "A ". Wearing course will cover 12 square yards when layed in a 1 1/2" lift. 285 tons @ $14 /ton - $ 3,990 Contingencies - 10% - 399 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 399 Total cost of resurfacing - 4,788 2) New Construction A cul -de -sac will be constructed within the project as indicated on Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way, at the intersection of Virginia and Iglehart . This will entail a 100' right -of -way and a 40' pavement radius to back of curb. The construction of the cul -de -sac facilitates (1) the use of the existing portion of Virginia, between Marshall and Iglehart and (2) permits -14- • • the school use for ample turning and parking area. The extent of new construction in this cul -de -sac will include a 3" asphalt pavement with a 6" gravel base, a concrete curb and gutter, and a 4' sidewalk, all in accord with City of St. Paul specifications. a) Pavement Street From To Size Square Feet Virginia Cul -de -sac Iglehart 40' Radius 5,024 The cost estimate for asphalt paving is $12 /ton in place, including seal and tack coats. One ton of Type "A" wearing course will cover 6 square yards when layed in a 3" lift. 93 Tons @ $12 /ton $1,116 The cost estimate for class 5 gravel Cxase in place is $ 0.50 /sq. yd. in place. 558 square yards @ $0.50 /sq . yd. 279 Asphalt Paving 1,116 Gravel base (6 ") 279 Total $1,395 Contingencies - 10% 140 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 140 Total Cul -de -sac paving cost $1,675 b) Curb and Gutter Street From To Size Lineal Feet Virginia Cul -de -sac at Iglehart 40' Radius 251 Virginia Marshall Cul -de -sac 340 The cost estimate for'Type 3" concrete curb and gutter in place on a curve is $2.40 /lineal foot. -15- 591 lineal feet @ $2.40 /lin. ft. Contingencies - 10% Engineering and Inspection - 10% Total cost for Curb and Gutter c) Sidewalk • $1,418 142 142 $1,702 Street From To Size Square Feet Virginia Cul -de -sac Iglehart 240 x 4 %0 Virginia Marshall Cul -de -sac 340 x 4 1,360 The cost estimate for a 4" Monolothicgconcrete sidewalk in place is $0.50 /sq. ft. (4° width). 2,320 square feet x $0.50 /sq . ft. $1,160 Contingencies - 10% 116 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 116 Total cost for sidewalk $1,392 b. Lighting The Lighting System on existing streets within the project area has been deemed insufficient and outmoded by City of St. Paul Standards. In order to provide the required foot candle lighting on these streets, it is proposed that the present lighting system be retained with the existing light fixture replaced by a new "Post Top Lumenaire" . This new Lumenaire will provide the city with a choice of five different light patterns, all operable on the present 189 watt service, and accommodating lamps up to 10, 000 lumens. The required lighting on the Virginia Cul -de -sac and on Western from Marshall to Carroll, will be provided by the relocation of facilities now located within the abandoned areas of the project. These relocated facilities will be converted to new Lumenaires by the above noted method. -16- • • 1) Relocation and Conversion (See Map No. 15, Proposed Street Lighting) Street From To No. of Poles Lineal Ft. Frontage Western Iglehart Carroll 3 300 Western Marshall- Iglehart 2 350 Virginia on Cul -de -sac 3 The cost estimate for relocating existing light standards and converting to new Lumenaire fixtures is $400 /pole. (Including feeders) 8 poles @ $400 /pole $3,200 Contingencies - 10% 320 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 320 Total cost of relocating and converting $3,840 2) Conversion (See Map No. 15, Proposed Street Lighting) Street From To No. of Poles Western Marshall Iglehart 4 Virginia Marshall Cul -de -sac 3 7 The cost estimate for converting existing poles to new Lumenaire fixtures is $85 /pole . 5 poles @ $85 /pole $425 Contingencies - 10% 43 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 43 Total cost for converting to new Lumenaire $511 c. Storm Sewer (See Map No. 11, Proposed Storm Sewer System) The only storm sewer line serving only the project area is that line in Virginia from the cul -de -sac to the proposed Freeway drainage system at Carroll. 100% credit is therefore claimed for this facility (See Figure 2). -17- , • • 400 lineal feet of 15" R.C.P. @ $4.08 /lin.ft. 193 cubic yards excavation @ $3.5 0/cu.yd. 2 Manholes @ $450/M. H. Total Contingencies - 10% Engineering and Inspection - 10% Total cost of storm sewer installation MUM $1,632 676 900 $3,208 321 321 $3,850 El • • SUMMARY SHEET ITEM I - PROJECT EXPENDITURES Project Site Clearance Pavement $10,533 Curb and Gutter 1,788 Sidewalk 794 Grading 7,012 Watermain 2,700 Combination Sewer 284 Lighting 264 Demolition of Structures 177,674 Water Service Shut -Off at $17,758 Structures to be Demolished 5,000 Sanitary Sewer Service Cappings at Structures to be Demolished 12,250 Subtotal $218,299 Project Site Improvements Street Resurfacing $4,788 Pavement 1,675 Curb and Gutter 1,702 Sidewalk 1,392 Lighting (Relocation and Conversion 3,840 Lighting (Conversion) 511 Storm Sewer 3,850 Subtotal $17,758 Total Item I, Project Expenditures $236,057 _19- • • TABLE OF CONTENTS II. Non Cash Local Grant -in -Aid 1. Project Improvements a. Site Clearance 1) Removal of Existing Street Improvement a) Project (other than Tech. H.S. Site) (1) Curb and Gutter (2) Sidewalk b) Technical - Vocational High School Site (1) Pavement (2) Curb and Gutter (3) Sidewalk (4) Grading 2) Existing Utility Removal or Abandonment a) Project (other than Tech. H.S. Site) (1) Lighting (2) Combination Sewer b) Technical- Vocational High School Site (1) Water Main (2) Combination Sewer (3) Lighting 3) SUMMARY SHEET b. Site Improvements 1) Right -of -Way Acquisition 2) Street Resurfacing 3) New Construction -20- • TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd) 0 a) Project (other than Tech. H.S. Site) (1) Pavement (2) Curb and Gutter (3) Sidewalk (4) Landscaping (5) Lighting (a) Conversions (b) Installation (6) Water Main (7) Sanitary Sewer (8) Storm Sewer b) Technical - Vocational High School Site Storm Sewer 4) Supporting Facilities 5) Summary Sheet -21 - i • I. Project Improvements a. Site Clearance • The clearance proposed for the north side of Marshall Avenue between Western and Cathedral Place will be required for the development of the Technical - Vocational High School Site by the St. Paul School Board and the First Christian Church. The added traffic volume anticipated to be generated (an approximate peak of 1,400 vehicles) by said High School and the added volume created by the proposed development of the other institutional facilities within the project, necessitates the need for a collector street between Western and Cathedral Place (See Figure No. 4, Proposed Traffic System). The City of St. Paul Thoroughfare Standards, Section III - A -4, (See Exhibit C, Proposed Plans for Thoroughfares), dictates a pavement width of 44' and a right -of -way width of 80' where feasible. In consideration of the benefit that will be derived by the project for street alteratfons, the project credit is based on Section 17 -4 -2 of the Urban Renewal Manual. Namely, proposed street width divided by project requirements or 44 °divided by 44' = 100 %. All site clearance work within the Technical - Vocational High School Site (with the exception of demolition and water sewer service shut -offs) will be undertaken by the School Board for the City of St.. Paul. This site clearance is necessary to .folfi II the objectives of the Urban Renewal Plan, -and the improvements are entirely within the project area. The expenditures of the St. Paul School Board, on this clearance action, are claimed as Non -Cash Local -Grant-in-Aids. 1) Removal of Existing Street Improvements. In order to achieve Urban Renewal Plan objectives a number of streets within or abutting the project will be vacated. -22- • • a) Project The following existing street improvements will be removed. The streets noted below are all boundary streets; 50% credit is claimed since these streets relate to required project standards otherwise 100% retroactive to the project. (1) Curb and Gutter Removal (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights - of -Way) Street From To Lineal Feet Marshall Western Virginia 380 Marshall Virginia Farrington 370 Marshall Farrington Louis 900 Marshall Louis Cathedral PI. 350 Marshal I Farrington Tota 1 2,000 The cost estimate for curb and gutter removal = $0.50 /lineal foot. 2,000 lineal feet @ $0.50 /lin.ft. $1,000 Contingencies - 10% 100 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 100 Total $1,200 A total of 50% of $1,200 or $600 is claimed as a project credit. (2) Sidewalk Removal (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way) -23 - Length 'k Street From To Width Sq. Ft. Marshall Western Virginia 380 x 4 1,520 Marshall Virginia Farrington 370 x 4 1,480 Marshal I Farrington Louis 900 x 4 3,600 Marshall Louis Cathedral P1.350 x 4 1,400 Tota 1 8,000 -23 - • • The cost estimate for removal of concrete sidewalk (4" thick) is $0.50 /square yard. 778 square yards @ $0.50 /sq.yd. $389 Contingencies - 10% 39 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 39 Tota 1 $467 A total of 50% of $467 or $234 is claimed as a project credit b) Technical - Vocational High School Site 100% credit is claimed for all site clearance in the Technical - Vocational High School Site. The site clearance work would ordinarily be undertaken by the Local Public Agency, but an agreement between the LPA and the St. Paul School Board notes the work is to be undertaken by the School Board in order to facilitate early redevelopment. (1) Pavement Removal (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way) Length Square Street From To x Width Feet Iglehart Virginia Farrington 370 x 30 11,100 Iglehart Farrington Louis 880 x 30 26,400 Iglehart Louis Cathedral PI. 350 x 30 10,500 Marshall PI. 120' East Louis 760 x 16 12,160 -24- 10,080 8,960 3,600 10,080 10,080 6,000 108,960 of Farrington Farrington Marshall PI. Iglehart 280 x 36 Farrington Iglehart Carroll 280 x 32 Louis Marshall Marshall PI. 100 x 36 Louis Marshall PI. Iglehart 280 x 36 Louis Iglehart Carroll 280 x 36 Alley S. Iglehart E. Louis 300 x 20 Total -24- 10,080 8,960 3,600 10,080 10,080 6,000 108,960 • • The cost estimate for pavement removal is $1 .50 /square yard. 12,107 square yards @ $1 .50 /sq . yd . $18,161 Contingencies - 10% 1,816 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 1,816 Total project credit $21,793 (2)Curb and Gutter (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way) Street From To Lineal Feet Iglehart Virginia Farrington 740 Iglehart Farrington Louis 1,760 Iglehart Louis Cathedral PI. 700 Farrington Marshall PI. Iglehart 560 Farrington Iglehart Carroll 560 Louis Marshall Marshall Pl. 200 Louis Marshall PI. Iglehart 560 Louis Iglehart Carroll 560 Tota 1 5,640 The cost estimate for curb and gutter removal is $0.50 /lineal foot. 5,640 lineal feet @ $0.50 /lin.ft. $2,820 Contingencies - 10% 282 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 282 `x Total project credit $3,384 (3) Sidewalk (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way) -25 - The cost estimate for 4' sidewalk removal is $0.50 /square yard. 2,507 square yards @ $0.50 /sq . yd. $1,254 Contingencies - 10% 125 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 125 Total project credit $1,504 (4) Grading (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way) Length x Square Street From To Width Feet Iglehart Virginia Farrington 740 x 4 2,960 Iglehart Farrin §ton Louis 1, 760 x 4 7,040 lglehart Louis Cathedral PI. 700 x 4 2,800 Farrington Marshall Pl. Iglehart 560 x 4 2,240 Farrington Iglehart Carroll 560 x 4 2,240 Louis Marshall Marshall PI . 200 x 4 800 Louis Marshall PI. IgIeharf 560 x 4 2,240 Louis Iglehart Carroll 560 x 4 2,240 Total 22,560 The cost estimate for 4' sidewalk removal is $0.50 /square yard. 2,507 square yards @ $0.50 /sq . yd. $1,254 Contingencies - 10% 125 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 125 Total project credit $1,504 -26 - (4) Grading (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way) Length Square Street From To x Width Feet Iglehart Virginia Cathedral PI. 1,550x 60 93,000 Marshall PI. 120' East of Louis 760 x 30 22,800 Farrington Farrington Marshall Pl . Carroll 660 x 45 291700 Louis Marshall Carroll 660 x 70 461200 Total 191,700 -26 - The cost estimate for finish grading Ys. $0.50 /square yard. 21,300 square yards @ $0.50 /sq .yd. $10,650 Contingencies - 10% 1,065 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 1,065 Total project credit $12,780 2) Existing Utility Removal or Abandonment Due to street closings and structure clearance, there are a number of utilities that will be abandoned, plugged or capped. Casements will be dedicated where utilities are to be retained in vacated rights --of -way. a) Project (1) Lighting (See Map No. 5, Proposed Street Lighting) All existing street lightpoles and fixtures, within the vacated street rights -of -way, will be removed and the concrete bases eliminated. The buried conduit will be capped and abandoned in place; no circuits will be dead -ended in this vacation process. The lighting on the north side of Marshall is necessitated by the u proposed widening on the north side of the street (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -drf -Way). It has been established that the widen- ing of Marshall is required by city standards and the pole removal is necessarily parcel to the widening. The project credit here is the some as that for Marshall Avenue construction (50 %) because it is a bounding facility. .Street From Marshal I Western 0 -27- To Poles to be removed Cathedral PI. 8 • • The cost estimate for complete light pole removal and capping of buried conduit is $20 /pole. 8 poles @ $20 /pole $160 Contingency, allowance is included in the unit price as obtained from engineers in the Bureau of Lighting. A total of 50% of $160 or $80 will be claimed as a credit to the project. Street Arundel Marshall (2) Combination Sewer (See Map No. 9, Existing Combination Sanitary and Storm Sewer System and Map No. 10, Proposed Sanitary Sewer System). Within the project area the proposed storm sewer system wi II serve to separate the existing combination sewer systems and allow said system to function entirely as a sanitary system. All existing catch basins presently a part of the combination system will be removed so as to eliminate entrance of storm waters. This procedure will eliminate the present problem of the existing sewer system being inadequate to handle peak loads. Those catch basins on the north side of Marshall from Western to Cathedral Place will be removed as part of the proposed Mar- shall Street widening. The remaining catch basins on boundary streets will be removed and a project credit of 50 %,will be claimed in accordance with the previously documented 50% benefit applicable to boundary streets. No. of From To Catch Basins Marshall Arundel South side of Marshall EKs1115 Iglehart 1 Western 2 2 Total 5 The cost estimate for removing catch basins is $1 0/catch basin. This price includes restoration of site. 5 catch basins @ $10 /catch basin $50 Contingencies are included in unit price as were obtained from city engineers. A total of 50% of $50 or $25 will be claimed as a project credit. b) Technical - Vocational High School Site (1) Water Main (See Map No. 13, Proposed Water System) All water mains will be plugged in such a manner so as to create no deadend lines or services. -29 - No. of Hydrants to Street From To W.M. P lugs be removed Iglehart Virginia Farrington 1 1 Iglehart Farrington Louis 1 1 Iglehart Louis Cathedral PI. 2 0 Marshall PI. 120' East of Louis 1 1 Farrington Farrington Marshall PI. Carroll 1 0 Louis Marshall Carroll 0 0 Tota 1 6 3 The cost estimate for water main plugging is $200 /plug 6 plugs @ $200 /plug $1,200 Contingencies - 10% 120 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 120 Total project cost $1,440 -29 - • • The cost estimate for hydrant removal is $50 /hydrant 3 hydrants @ $50 /hydrant $150 Contingencies - 10% 15 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 15 Total project cost $180 (2) Combination Sewer (See Map No. 10, Proposed Sanitary Sewer System) All existing sanitary sewers in the Technical - Vocational High School Site will be plugged in such a manner as to eliminate sewage back -up. Storm water and sanitary sewer lines that will be required to service the high school will be installed by that entity. The cost estimate for manhole removal is $15 /manhole 1 I Manholes @ $15 /manhole $165 Contingencies - 10% 17 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 17 Total Project cost $199 -30- Man- Catch Street From To Plugs Holes Basins Iglehart Virginia Cathedral 6 6 4 P lace Marshall PI. Farrington Louis 2 4 0 Farrington Marshall PI. Carroll 4 1 4 Louis Marshall PI. Carroll 4 0 4 Total 16 11 12 The cost estimate for manhole removal is $15 /manhole 1 I Manholes @ $15 /manhole $165 Contingencies - 10% 17 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 17 Total Project cost $199 -30- The cost estimate for catch basin removal is $1 0/catch basin 12 catch basins @ $1 %atch basin $120 Contingencies - 10% 12 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 12 Total Project cost $144 The cost estimate for sewer plugging is $2 /plug 16 plugs @ $2 /plug $32 Contingencies - 10% 3 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 3 Total Project Cost $38 (3) Lighting (See Map No. 15, Proposed Street Lighting) All existing street light poles and fixtures, within the vacated street rights -of -way, will be removed and the concrete bases eliminated. The buried conduit will be capped and abandoned in place. No circuits will be dead -ended in this vacation process. Street From To Poles to be removed Iglehart Virginia Cathedral 13 Place Farri ngton Marsha I I P I. Carroll 4 Tota l 17 The cost estimate for complete light pole removal and capping of buried conduit is $20 /pole. 17 poles @ $20 /pole $340 Contingency and Engineering allowances are included in the unit removal cost as obtained from the Bureau of Street Lighting. -31 - I SUMMARY SHEET Project Boundary Streets Total Cost Curb and Gutter (50% credit) $1,200 Sidewalk (50% credit) 467 Lighting (50% credit) 160 Combination Sewer (50% credit) 50 Subtotal $1,877 Technical - Vocational High School Site Pavement $21,793 Curb and Gutter 3,384 Sidewalk 1,504 Grading 12,780 Water Main 1,620 Combination Sewer 381 Lighting 340 Subtotal $41,802 Tota 1 $43,679 !&),, m Non -Cash Credit $600' 234 80 25 $939 $939 .7 b. Site Improvements 0 As noted in Section II, a, the traffic volume and proposed parking on the south side of Marshall (both created by the proposed Technical- Vocational High School) will require a minimum 44' pavement width and an 80' right -of -way to conform to City of St. Paul standards for a collector street. (See Exhibit C, Proposed Plan for Thoroughfares). The existing pavement will be retained with the addition of a 1 -1/2" asphalt overlay to provide a transition for the new 12' pavement strip. The existing curb and gutter, and sidewalk on the south side of the street will be retained. The extent of the street construction will include asphalt paving and base curb and gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on the north side; and on the south side, street lighting con- version. 1) Right -of -way Acquisition (See Map No. 20, Disposition) Based on the above noted city- right -of -way requirements the existing 66' right -of -way on Marshall will be increased 14' from Virginia to Cathedral Place excluding that portion abutting the First Christian Church (which will be widened only five feet) and an irregular shaped parcel between Western and Virginia. The acquitition will entail approximately 2,000 lineal feet at 14 foot and 70 lineal feet at 5 foot. The square foot cost for the land was established by the market appraiser for re -use sites at $0.315 /sq.ft. (See R -225, Disposition Report) Project credit is claimed in accord with the proposed construction or 50% 31,219 square feet x $0.315/sq. ft. $9,834 A total of 50% of $9,834 or $4,917 is claimed as a project credit. -33 - • • The proposed right -of -way changes on Western from Marshall to Carroll will involve dedications to the city in exchange for vacated rights -of -way elsewhere in the project by action of the LPA. (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way) 2) Street Resurfacing (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way) Due to existing surface conditions, or as in the case of Marshall Avenue reflecting a transition between existing and new paving, a 1 -1/2" lift will be required in order to create an accepta:ble surfacing on all boundary streets. In all cases the lift will be feathered at the outer edges to meet the flow lines of the gutter. Since the boundary streets are considered local in character 50% credit is claimed. The cost estimate for street resurfacing is $14 /ton in place including seal and tack coats. One ton type "A" wearing course will cover 12 square yards when laid in a 1 -1/2" lift. 1, 000 tons of asphalt x $14 /ton $14,000 Contingencies - 10% 1.400 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 1,400 Total cost oferesurfacing $16,800 A total of 50% of $16,800 or $8,400 is claimed as project credit. -34- Length x Square Street From To Width Feet Arundel Marshall Iglehart 300 x 32 7,600 Arundel Iglehart Carro 11 360 x 32 11,520 Marshall Western Virginia 380 x 44 16,720 Marshall Virginia Farrington 360 x 44 15,840 Marsha I I Farrington Louis 900 x 44 39,600 Marshall Louis Cathedral PI. 350 x 44 15,400 Total 108,680 The cost estimate for street resurfacing is $14 /ton in place including seal and tack coats. One ton type "A" wearing course will cover 12 square yards when laid in a 1 -1/2" lift. 1, 000 tons of asphalt x $14 /ton $14,000 Contingencies - 10% 1.400 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 1,400 Total cost oferesurfacing $16,800 A total of 50% of $16,800 or $8,400 is claimed as project credit. -34- 3) New Construction The only new pavement to be constructed on a boundary street is the 12' strip to be added to the north side of the existing pavement (in order to provide the required 44' pavement width) on Marshall Avenue from Western Avenue to Cathedral Place. A city standard of a 3" asphalt pavement with a 6" gravel base is proposed for this pavement addition, since additional improve- ments will be undertaken in a later project - (See G NRP) . A "Type 3" concrete curb and gutter, a 4" thick 4' wide concrete sidewalk, street lighting and landscaping will complete the new construction required on Marshall. A credit of 50% is claimed for this improvement. a) Project (other than Technical- Vocational High School Site) (1) Pavement (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way) Length x• Square Street From To Width Feet Marshall, Western Virginia 380 x 12 4,560 Marshall Virginia Farrington 360 x 12 4,320 Marshall Farrington Louis 900 x 12 10,800 Marshall Louis Cathedral PI . 350 x 12 4,200 Tota 1 23,880 The cost estimate for asphalt paving is $12 /ton in place, including seal and tack coats. One ton of "Type A" wearing course will •cover 6 square yards when laid in a 3" lift. (See Exhibit B, Specifications for Street and Sewer Construction.) 442 tons of asphalt @ $12 /ton $'5,304 -35 - 0 0 Contingencies - 10% 530 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 530 Subtotal $6,364 The cost estimate for "Class 5" gravel be 2,653 square yards @ $0.50 /sq .yd . Contingencies - 10% Engineering and Inspection - 10% Subtotal Total cost for Paving se is $0.50 /square yard in place $1,327 133 133 $10,593 $ 7,957 A total of 50% of $7,957 oFj $3, 978 is claimed as a project credit (2)Curb and Gutter (See Map No. 3, Proposed Rights -of -Way) Street From To Lineal Feet Marshall Western Virginia 380 Marshall Virginia Farrington 360 Marshall Farrington Louis 960 Marshall Louis Cathedral PI. 350 Total 1,990 The cost estimate for "Type 3" concrete curb and gutter is $2.10 /lineal foot in place. 1,990 lineal feet x $2.10 /1 in. ft. $4,179 Contingencies - 10% 418 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 418 Total cost of concrete curb and gutter is $5,015 A total of 50% of $5,015 or $2,507 is claimed as a project credit. - 36 - • • Tota 1 7,960 The cost estimate for 4" monolithic concrete sidewalk in place is $0.50 per square foot. 7,960 square feet @$0.50 /sq . ft. _ $3,980 Contingencies - 10% = 398 Engineering and Inspection - 10% = 398 Total cost of sidewalk $4,776 A total of 50% of $4,776 or $2,388 is claimed as a project credit. (4) Landscaping (See Map No. 3, Proposed Right -of -Way) The only area where landscaping will be required is the north side of Marshall. A width of 14 feet will be seeded between the curb and sidewalk. Trees will be planted at 20 feet intervals in order to conform to the existing tree spacing on the south side of Marshall. (a) Seeding (including seed, fertilizer and planting) The cost estimate for seeding is $0 -15 per square yard. 2,893 square yards @ $0.15 /sq, yd. — $434 Contingencies - 10% = 43 Total cost of seeding $477 -37- (3) Sidewalk (See Map No. 3, Proposed Right -of -Way) Length x Street From To Width Sq . Ft. Marshall Western Virginia 380 x 4 1,520 Marshall Virginia Farrington 360 x 4 1,440 Marshall Farrington Louis 900 x 4 3,600 Marshal I Louis Cathedral P1.350 x 4 1 400 Tota 1 7,960 The cost estimate for 4" monolithic concrete sidewalk in place is $0.50 per square foot. 7,960 square feet @$0.50 /sq . ft. _ $3,980 Contingencies - 10% = 398 Engineering and Inspection - 10% = 398 Total cost of sidewalk $4,776 A total of 50% of $4,776 or $2,388 is claimed as a project credit. (4) Landscaping (See Map No. 3, Proposed Right -of -Way) The only area where landscaping will be required is the north side of Marshall. A width of 14 feet will be seeded between the curb and sidewalk. Trees will be planted at 20 feet intervals in order to conform to the existing tree spacing on the south side of Marshall. (a) Seeding (including seed, fertilizer and planting) The cost estimate for seeding is $0 -15 per square yard. 2,893 square yards @ $0.15 /sq, yd. — $434 Contingencies - 10% = 43 Total cost of seeding $477 -37- • • l (b)Trees (Spaced at 20 feet intervals) The cost estimate for trees is $25 per tree 93 trees @ $25 /tree - $2,325 Contingencies - 10% 233 Total cost for trees is $2,558 A total of 50% of $2,558 or $1,279 is claimed as a project credit. (5) Lighting (See Map No. 15, Proposed Street Lighting) The existing lighting facilities on Arundel from Marshall to Carroll will be converted in the manner set forth for the interior streets (noted previously). The existing lighting facilities on the north side of Marshall between Western and Cathedral Place will be removed as indicated in Section 2:a..1) (this report) and replaced by new light standards, bases, and fixtures. The proposed facilities on the north side of Marshall will be designed for relocation to the center street median anticipated for installation in a later project. (a) Conversion Street From To Number of Poles Arundel Marshall Iglehart 1 Arundel Iglehart Carroll 1 Marshall Arundel Western 7 Marshall Western Virginia 1 Marshall Virginia Farrington 2 Marshall Farrington Louis 5 Marshall Louis Cathedral PI. 2 Total 19 ORM • • The cost estimate for converting existing lights to new "Post Top Lumenaires " is $85 per pole. 19 poles @ $85 /pole - $1,615 Contingencies - 10% = 162 Engineering and Inspection - 10% = 162 Total cost of converting to new lumenaires is$1,939 A total of 50% of $1,939 or $969 is claimed as a project credit. (b) New Lighting Street From To Lineal Feet Marshall Western Virginia 380 Marshall Virginia Farrington 360 Marshall Farrington Louis 900 Marshall Louis Cathedral PI. 350 Total 1,990 The cost estimate for new lighting, including pole, base, fixtures, and feeder line is $12 per lineal foot of frontage. Poles are to be located at 100 foot intervals. 1,990 lineal feet of frontage @ $12 /lin.ft. _ $23,880 Contingencies - 10% = 2,388 Engineering and Inspection - 10% = 2,388 ' Total cost of new lighting is $28,656 A total of 50% of $28,656 or $14,328 is claimed as a project credit. (6) Water Main (See Map No. 12, Proposed Water System) Even though the project is benefited by the presence of the proposed water main located in the South Frontage Road of Interstate #94,an agreement with the Minnesota Highway Depart- ment notes that this line will be installed by the highway department at no cost to the City of St. Paul . -39- • • The only main which will be of 100% benefit to the project is the 6" line in Arundel,..a boundary street. The system only requires a 4" line in this area, but due to city standards the minimum acceptable line size is 6 ". Location of Line Length of Line Size of Line No. of Hydrants Arundel - Iglehart- Carroll 350 lin. ft. 6" 0 The cost estimate for a 6" water main, in place (including valves) is $6 per lineal foot. 350 lineal feet @ $6 /lin. ft. _ $2,100 Contingencies - 10% - 210 Engineering and Inspection -10% = 210 Total $2,520 A total of 50% of $2,520 or $1,260 is claimed as a project credit. (7) Sanitary Sewers (See Map No. 10, Proposed Sanitary Sewer System) The proposed sanitary sewer lines lie entirely within the project, but the project requirements dictate only a 12" line to serve this area. A project credit of only 50% is claimed for the pro- posed line due to project necessitated rerouting. It is proposed that the present 24" line flowing north on Arundel be extended to intersect with the line on Carroll. Due to the added volume created by this 24" line, the existing 12" line flowing east on Carroll must be increased to a 24" line. The existing manholes on Carroll will be utilized; one man- hole will be required on Arundel. The estimated cost of 24" sanitary sewer in this area is $5.75 per lineal foot plus $4 per cubic yard for excavation (for 1, 000 lineal feet of sewer) . -40- • • Cost of 24" V.C.P. = 1,000 lineal feet @ $5.75 /lin.ft. $5,750 Cost of excavation = 64,000 cubic feet. = 2,370 cu. yds. @ $4 /cu.yd. 9,480 Cost of one manhole required on Arundel between Iglehart and Carroll 450 Subtotal $15,680 Contingencies - 10% = 1,568 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 1,568 Total $18,816 A total of 50% of $18,816 or $9,408 is claimed as a project credit. The relocation is necessitated by project objectives; and the sewer line is located in a boundary street; therefore, a total of 50% of $18,816 or $9,408 is claimed as a project credit, (8) Storm Sewer (See Map No. 11, Proposed Storm Sewer System) The City of St. Paul sewer engineers have agreed to furnish the Minnesota Highway Department with information per- taining to additional volume requirements, created by the project, for thestorm sewer line in John Ireland Blvd. from Selby Street to St. Anthony Tunnel. The size of the storm sewer pipes, within Interstate #94 and John Ireland Blvd., have not been designated by the Minnesota Highway Depart- ment at this time. Therefore the various sizes indicated in the following cost estimates are an approximation based on the "Q" information obtained from the Minnesota Highway Department. -41 - 1- In many cases, the project volume requirements will dictate a pipe size smaller then the 12" proposed. It has been indi- cated by city sewer engineers that the city will only allow a 12" minimum pipe size for any future storm sewer construc- tion. The percent of project credit in all cases was based on the ratio of project drainage areas served divided by the total drainage area served. Credit for the boundary streets is based on the maximum allow- able in Section 17 -4 -2 of the Urban Renewal Manual. Pipe Size Pipe Size % Street From To for System for Project I Credit Arundel Marshall Iglehart 2111 12" 13% Total Project Acres Served _ 0.9 _ Total Acres Served 6.5 13% The cost estimate for a 21" R.C.P. is $5.70 per lineal foot plus $3.50 per cubic yard for excavation, $450 per manhole, and $200 per inlet including connection. 340 lineal feet @ $5.70 /lin .ft. _ $1,938 217 cubic yards @ $3.5 0/cu .yd . = 760 8 inlets @ $200 /inlet - 1,600 3 manholes @ $450 /manhole = 1,350 Subtotal $5,648 Contingencies - 10% 565 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 565 Total $6,778 A total of 6.5% of $6,778 or $441 is claimed as a project credit. -42- • • Pipe Size Pipe Size % Street From To for System for Project I Credit Arundel Iglehart Carroll 15" 12" 24% (See Appendix, following this report) Total Project Acres Served 1.8 = 24% Total Acres Served 7.4 The cost estimate for a 15" R.C.P. is $4.08 per lineal foot plus $3.50 per cubic yard for excavation, $450 per manhole, and $200 per inlet including connection. 330 lineal feet @ $4.08 /lin.ft. - $1,346 226 cubic yards @ $3.5 0/cu.yd. = 791 8 inlets @ $200 /inlet = 1,600 2 manholes @ $450 /manhole - 900 Subtotal $4,637 Contingencies - 10% = 464 Engineering and Inspection - 10% = 464 Tota 1 $5,565 A total of 12% of $5,565 or $668 is claimed as a project credit. Pipe Size Pipe Size % Street From To for System for Project I Credit Carroll Arundel Western 27" 12" 11.2% Total Project Acres Served - 4.6 = 11.2% Total Acres Served 39.9 The cost estimate for a 27" R.C.P. is $8.10 per lineal foot plus $3.50 per cubic yard for excavation, $450 per manhole, and $200 per inlet includ- ing connection. 660 lineal feet @8. 10/1 i n . ft. _ $5,346 665 cubic yards @ $3.5 0/cu .yd . = 2,328 2 inlets @ $200 /inlet = 400 2 manholes @ $450 /manhole = 900 Subtotal $8,974 MINE Contingencies - 10% - $ 897 Engineering and Inspection 10% 897 Total $10,768 A total of 5.8% of $10,768 or $625 is claimed as a project credit. i Pipe Size Pipe Size % Street From To for System for Project I Credit Marshall Virginia Farrington 18" 15" 52% Total Project Acres Served = 2.0 = 52% Total Acres Served 3.8 The cost estimate for an 18" R.C.P. is $4.44 per lineal foot plus $4 per cubic foot for excavation, $450 per manhole and $200 per inlet including connection. 360 lineal feet @ $4.44 /lin.ft. _ $1,598 1, 167 cubic yards @ $4 /cu . ud . = 4,668 6 inlets @ $200 /inlet = 1,200 2 manholes @ $450 /manhole - 900 Subtotal $8,366 Contingencies - 10% 837 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 837 Total $10,040 A total of 26% of $10,040 or $2,610 is claimed as a project credit. Pipe Size Pipe Size % Street From To for System for Project I Credit Marshall Farrington Louis 21" 12" 18% Total Project Acres Served = 2.0 - 18% Total Acres Served 11.1 The cost estimate for a 21" R.C.P. is $5.70 per lineal foot plus $4 per cubic yard for excavation, $450 per manhole, and $200 per inlet including connection. -44- • • 900 lineal feet @ $5.70 /lin.ft. _ $5,130 1,687 cubic yards @ $4 /cu . yd . = 6,748 8 inlets @ $200 /inlet = 1,600 2 manholes @ $450 /manhole -- 900 Subtotal $14,378 Contingencies - 10% 1,438 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 1,438 Total $17,254 A total of 9% or $17,254 or $1,553 is claimed as a project credit. Pipe Size Pipe Size % Street From To for System for Project I Credit Marshal I Louis Cathedral 2111 12" 18% Place Total Project Acres Served = 3.37 = 18% Total Acres Served 18.7 The cost estimate for 21 " R .0 .P P. is $5.70 per lineal foot plus $3.50 per cubic yard for excavation, $450 per manhole, and $200 per inlet including connection. 360 lineal feet @ $5.70 /lin.ft. - $2,052 200 cubic yard @ $3.5 0/cu.yd. = 700 6 inlets @ $200 /inlet = 1,200 2 manholes @ $450 /manhole = 900 Subtotal $4,852 Contingencies - 10% 485 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 485 Total $5,822 A total of 9% of $5,822 or $524 is claimed as a project credit. -45- • • The following sewer lines lie entirely within the project area, but serve the project only to the extent indicated. Pipe Size Pipe Size % Street From To for System for Project I Credit Western Marshall Iglehart 30" 15" 15% Total Project Acres Served - 7.7 - 15% Total Acres Served 44.8 The cost estimate for 30" R.C.P. is $9.30 per lineal foot plus $3.50 per cubic yard for excavation, $450 per manhole and $200 per inlet includ- ing connection.. 340 lineal feet @ $9.30 /lin.ft. _ $3,162 533 cubic yards @ $3.5 0/cu .yd . = 1,866 8 inlets @ $200 /in let = 1,600 3 manholes @ $450 /manhole = 1,350 Subtotal $7,978 Contingencies - 10% 798 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 798 Total $9,574 A total of 15% of $9,574 or $1,436 is claimed as a project credit. Pipe Size Pipe Size Street From To for System for Project I Credit Western Iglehart Carroll 30" 18" 20.4% Total Project Acres Served - 9.0 = 20.4% Total Acres Served 46.9 The cost estimate for a 30" R.C.P. is $9.30 per lineal foot, $3.50 per cubic yard for excavation, $450 per manhole, and $200 per inlet including connection. 330 lineal feet @ $9.30 /lin.ft. _ $3,069 517 cubic yards @ $3.5 0/cu.yd. = 1,810 6 inlets @ $200 /inlet - 1,200 3 manholes @ $450 /manhole 1,350 Subtotal $7,429 MEM ! ! Contingencies - 10% $ 743 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 743 Total $8,915 A total of 20.4% of $8,915 or $1,819 is claimed as a project credit. The drainage system presently proposed by the Minnesota Highway Depart- ment in the median of John Ireland Boulevard (from Marshall to the Southern Freeway Frontage Road) must be increased in capacity since the additional drainage area created by the project was not incorporated in the free- way plan. The City of St. Paul will absorb the cost of the over - sizing of these pipes. Estimated Estimated Pipe Size Pipe Size % Street From To for System for Project I Credit John Ireland Marshall Frontage 42" 12" 7% Road The cost estimate for a 42" R.C.P. is $17.10 per lineal foot @ $3.50 per cubic yard for excavation, and $450 per manhole. 400 lineal feet @ $17.10 /lin.ft. - $6,840 333 cubic yards @ $3.5 0/cu .yd . = 1,166 3 manholes @ $450 /manhole = 1,350 Subtotal $9,356 Contingencies - 10% 936 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 936 Total, $11,228 A total of 7% of $11,228 or $786 is claimed as a project credit. That portion of the Freeway drainage system extending north easterly from John Ireland Boulevard and intersecting with the St. Anthony -Hill Tunnel will be paid for by the City of St. Paul in proportion to the increase in capacity re- quired by the project. -47- • Estimated Pipe Size Street From To for System Across Freeway Frontage St. Anthony- 42" Road Hill Tunnel pq LJ Estimated Pipe Size % for Project I Credit 30" 34% The cost estimate for 42" R.C.P. is $17.10 per lineal foot and $3.50 per cubic yard for excavation. 1,000 lineal feet @ $17.10 /lin.ft. $17,100 1,019 cubic yards @ $3.50 /cu.yd. - 3,567 Subtotal $20,667 Contingencies - 10% 2,067 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 2,067 Total $24,801 A total of 34% of $24,801 or $8,432 is claimed as a project credit. b) Technical - Vocational High School Site Storm Sewer The additional volume of surface water created by the school site will require that the proposed highway drainage system be enlarged in capacity. In joint discussions with engineering representatives of the City and Minnesota Highway Department it was noted that a portion of the project drainage area (between Western and Virginia) had been previously considered by the highway depart- ment in their preliminary utility design for Interstate #94. (See Figure No. 2, Storm Water Drainage Areas) . Permission was also given (by the Minnesota Highway Department to the City School Board ) for incorporating their storm drainage needs into the highway drainage system at the 364' line between Louis and Cathedral. The City School Board Architects were contacted and they agreed to furnish the Minnesota Highway Department with the additional volume requirement. The additional expense to OEM • • the state for the oversizing of their system, (See Exhibit F, Preliminary Utilities Plan, Interstate #94) attributed to the School Site, will be shared on a proportional basis by the St. Paul School Board. The following information is predi- cated on anticipated volumes created by the Technical - Vocational High School Site. The drainage system presently proposed by the Minnesota High- way Department for the Freeway must be increased on the Southern Frontage Road from Cathedral Place south - easterly to John Ireland Boulevard, then north to the intersection with the St. Anthony Hi II Tunnel l,. The increase in cost due to the additional requirement of the line in the southern Frontage Road from Cathedral Place to John ! reland Boulevard will be absorbed by the St. Paul School Board. The increased cost of installing the sewer extending north from this point will be absorbed by the City of St. Paul. The following line will flow into the Free- way drainage system at Cathedral Place, but serves only the Technical - Vocational High School portion of the project; there- fore, 100% credit is claimed (See Exhibit F, Preliminary Utilities Plan, Interstate X94) Pipe Street From To Size Frontage Farrington Cathedral 36" Road Place The cost estimate for 36" R.C.P. in place is $14.50 per lineal foot. Z= • • 1,200 lineal feet @ $14.50 /lin.ft. _ $17,400 1,111 cubic yards @ $3.5 0/cu.yd. = 3,889 5 manholes @ $450 /manhole = 2,250 Subtotal $23,539 Contingencies - 10% 2,354 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 2,354 Tota 1 $28,247 A total project credit of $28,247 is claimed (See Exhibit F). The following line is presently proposed by the Minnesota Highway Department as a part of the Freeway drainage system, but must be increased to meet project requirements. Estimated Estimated Pipe Size Pipe Size % Street From To for System for T. H.S. Credi t Frontage Cathedral John 42" 36" 75% Road Place Ire land Blvd. The cost estimate for 42" R.C.P. is $17.10 per lineal foot, $3.50 per cubic yard for excavation and $450 per manhole. 600 lineal feet @ $17.10 /lin.ft. - $10,260 611 cubic yards @ $3.50/cu-.yd. - 2,139 4 manholes @ $450 /manhole = 1,800 Subtotal $14,199 Contingencies - 10% 1,420 Engineering and Inspection - 10% 1,420 Total $17,039 A total of 75% of $17,039 or $12,779 is claimed as a project credit. 1114110 • • STORM SEWER SUMMARY Storm Sewer 6.5 $ 6,778 $ 441 " 12.0 5,565 668 " 5.6 10,768 625 " 26.0 10,040 2,610 " If 9.0 17,254 1,553 " it 9.0 5,827 524 " 15.0 9,574 1,436 " 20.4 8,915 1,819 " 7.0 11,228 786 If If 34.0 24,801 8,432 To to I $ 110,745 $18,958 -51 - 4) Supporting Facilities a) Public Open Space (Technical - Vocational High School Site) At the present time the Urban Renewal Project Area does not contain any recreational areas. The proposed land use plan reflects a 5 acre park (224, 770 square feet) located in the Western portion of the proposed Technical - Vocational High School Site. It has been determined, by comparing the ratio of the families within the project (following redevelopment) to the entire number of families in the service area of the park, that there is a relative benefit to Project I of 17 %. (See Figure No. 3). Number of Projected Project I Families 190 Number of Families in Service Area of 1,133 Parks 190 divided by 1,133 =:; 17% The basis for estimating the park development costs is noted below. The estimate is $3,000 per acre for improvements and $0.315 per square foot for land acquisition. The cost estimate, per square foot, for land acquisition is based on an estimate prepared by the reuse appraiser. Improvement Seeding . Sod 2 hooded Softball backstops Sidewalks Deciduous Trees Evergreen Trees Unit Unit of Cost Measure .15 square yard .40 square yard 730.00 each .50 25.00 30.00 -52 - square feet each each The cost estimate based on the above figure is 5.16 acres @ $13, 721 /acre (land value) — $70,800 5.16 acres @ $3, 000/acre (improvements) = 15,480 Total cost $86,280 Relative Benefit to Project 107%) $14,668 -53 - Unit Unit of Improvement Cost Measure Ornamentals $ 10.00 each Shrubs 5.00 each Lighting 3,000.00 per 5 acre playground The cost estimate based on the above figure is 5.16 acres @ $13, 721 /acre (land value) — $70,800 5.16 acres @ $3, 000/acre (improvements) = 15,480 Total cost $86,280 Relative Benefit to Project 107%) $14,668 -53 - • • SUMMARY SHEET Street Improvement Removals % Total Project Boundary Streets Credit Cost Curb and Gutter 50 $ 1,200 Non -Cash Credit $ 600 Sidewalk 50 467 234 L Lighting 50 160 80 Combination Sewer 50 50 25 Subtotal $ 1,877 $ 939 Technical - Vocational High School Site Clearance Pavement - $ 21,793 Curb and Gutter - 3,384 Sidewalk - 1,504 Gradi ng - 12,780 Lighting - 340 Water Main - 1,620 Combination Sewer - 381 Subtotal - $ 41,679 -54- # • • SUMMARY SHEET (con-t-) Site Improvements Technical - Vocational High School Site Storm Sewer 100 % Total Partial Project Credit Credit Cost- Right-of-Way Acquisition 50 $ 9,834 Street Resurfacing 50 16,800 Pavement 50 7,957 Curb and Gutter 50 5,015 Sidewalk 50 4,776 Landscaping 50 2,525 Lighting (conversion) 50 1, 939 Lighting (new) 50 28,656 Water Main 50 2,520 Sanitary Sewer 50 18,816 Storm Sewer 110,745 Subtotal $ 209,583 Technical - Vocational High School Site Storm Sewer 100 $28,247 Storm Sewer 75 17,039 Subtotal $ 45,286 Supporting Facilities (Technical - Vocational High School Site) Public Open Space 17 $86,280 Subtotal $,86, 280 Total - Project $2114,830 Total - Technical - Vocational High $ 169,875 School Site Total - Item If $384,705 -55 - Non -Cash Credit $ 4,917 8,400 3,978 2,507 2,388 1,279 969 14,328 1,260 9,408 18,958 $ 68,328 $ 28,247 12,779 $ 41,026 $ 14, 668 $14,668 $69,840 $ 96,800 $ 166,640 0 0 APPENDIX -56- • • Project I Storm Sewer Capacity Calculations Road -57- Total Q Slope Size Street From To Acres Acres % Pipe Arundel Marshall Iglehart 0.9 0.9 1.23 0.6 12" Arundel Iglehart Carroll 0.9 1.8 2.47 3.7 12" Carro I I Arundel Western 2.8 4.6 6.30 3.5 12" Western Marshall Iglehart 6.9 6.9 9.45 3.5 15" Western Iglehart Carroll 2.1 9.0 13.70 3.5 18" Virginia Dayton Marshall 2.0 2.0 2.74 0.3 15" Marshall Virginia Farrington 1.8 3.8 5.21 0.3 18" Marshal I Farrington Louis 7.3 11.1 15.21 1.0 2111 Marshall Louis John Ire- 2.1 18.7 25.60 3.0 21 " land Blvd. Virginia Cul -de -sac Carroll 2.0 2.0 2.70 0.3 15" Frontage Farrington Freeway 22.5 22.5 30.80 0.3 36" Road -57- (Y) 6F— o Q U 11 Q� w0 Ql-- ir O O m w a- .�. 0 O � Q 1-- �n (r 1-- �4 Q .,� L Q, • N 11 11 11 w W a H x a. ry a. in w IL O\ J° N vi Or w 6 J N Q w cr O U �Q W V) In �z x0 O H H H In I .:D aU P4 .0 ti }1 C9 H H U Q a U w U Q z 0 H Q U O J • • rl r I r i r- I N CN N M N r♦ N r-i N r i r 1 M N I� O N N M [� rn M M M M O 1� � M r I H H O r-1 , I o m m o 0 o c4 ri 4 o H m CO .* O N LO � [� -t w CO H m 1` N r-I O rl O O rn m O N C Lo w m H w O rl N m m cs O 1` N rn Lr w r I W r1 O r c4 z; 9 oOz N z; ri M O N rn 9 N O r-i H N N N r-I u) M r-I H LO LC LC H 04 rl M C:.) O rn O CO rn N Ln O T O N N O a: M r-i OO n 4 CD t%- LO O (.O 1` (3) M O M O W N rl OD O O N N H ri cl, N M N r-i OO r-I N O z' CD Lo =' tT 0 Lo r- u*) O O o0 N tT r1 N O O O M rn O ri O O O to M r i M Ln cD � O Ll Z N �' O N m O C4 N N O N r- LID O N OD O CV CN H N N •ri rd A b a • r-♦ - > r-I is 4J O m 4J r_: sl rd r-♦ rd r-i P+ r-I r-i F+ r-I •rl M CLI In In rd O 3 O r-i r-I rd r I a N rd H r' W P r-i fa r-i ri [," • ri • ri H H 'O Q1 Q) O ri x: O T ; O �4 F4 �4 N r-I ,1; O r ( • r1 ::j :j r-i N • r1 v Ill �-r I ; R1 V Pr a (1) �4 Q) W > • ri i-r P: rd N P i-r rd P o o rd P rd P rd P �4• r1 0 4 H Sa A O::J H P iJ iJ A> N O 9 r-I P In A P a a A R1 A 4J U) W rd r-i +3 P W rd In (n r-♦ N +J N OA rd • r1 In rd In U H U � Q H U N a) N 0 3 p H U X� 1� O o P4 s~ O O O O >� ru 3 .3: 4 4-) rd rd Ea rd +3 4J rd rC� -P d-r +J 4-r C: o u A r- o o 0 C/3 A O o o C/3 o AX: o o o �E: O Q) +3 rd i-+ +-+ +J +J +J o o I; +i P +J o +-+ I: 1~ �-D 1. 0 O sl a4 �E:: 0 0 O o +-J +-r O O O O +-J O O O O O rd rd O +O +3 i r r-I +-r +-r +-r r-: H i-r P i-r rd 4-r +J r-I 4-) iJ rd +-J 4-r +-) O iJ CO v] i-) o P o H P • ri • rl r-i P H r-I U • H H �4 r-♦ • ri U bD i-r OLC I 1 bi +' rd P M ro rQ r i A rd rd O O r-: I~ C: > q: rd rd r-I �:: f; r- 1; rl s; N O 1: .� A O .a 9 O A::1 A � ro b o •ri -r-I A O .� A O O •r1 •ri -r-I O U) •ri A A ri Q) (3) 4J r-I +J In N .X P H 9 In Q) s~ 9. +-) Pr U r-i i-J N N P 4-r W P P +- • r-I �r 1 1 �+ H ri s~ N > P r-I �l 1U U P r1 =5 :J > X 94 4) > P H P P �4 > K P H r1 rd b0 O 9 rd b bc ra rd -_ rd rd m p p rd rd • r-I A rd rd a rd rd • H rd rd rt O (i ::3 :j M A H X U) A= H D rl In �E: H ¢ A PI > cn A�E: H U A > W W A a W U U fl4 ra rd sl x O C: iJ rd r-I r-I r-I rd Q) r-I H •ri •r1 •ri •r1 H r-1 r-I r-I H r-I r-I W 9: r: L: •ri r-1 r-I H •r1 bD r-I ri A A A A r-i N N rd a) a) r-I r, >; > P % �4 P P 1:� Ri Ri 1; rd >1 r- rd O O ::1 :j :� 0 O 'C7 'b A 10 'O O O • r-I A A m (1) 0) (1) 41 • H A A O In rC A • ri i-r P +-r P 9 .X rX P r. is N 1; s: P +J �4 H H i-J -P 4J +.r +J M N N +� N r-I +J DO f: 94 9 f•+ U U U U P�3 0 P:1 :1 P > P Q) Q) CO m In N fn f`r s`+ f4 >, ;:% P Q) 9 94 O rd O rd b rd ro rd rd P S+ N f r p b b R1 A r- O N N Q) N r1 Ri b rd O rd 4 O •r1 p U a4 U�2: =:E: :E: U Q Q A Q U A f1. cn 3 3 3 3> ;2:: r A i-ri .4 ~ to x> P. 9 0 R 225 LAND DISPOSAL REPORT R 225 I . Two complete copies of the reuse appraisal and marketability report, including an analysis of land utilization, are included with this submission (separately bound). 2. The studies cited above, including investigation of available financing by the market analyst, are referred to in the market study and indicate that subject land is marketable. An aggressive program of disposition and a carefully staged disposition schedule will be undertaken to facilitate early development of the Technical - Vocational High School. Realization of the total program of renewal will entail only minute initiative on the part of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of St. Paul, since most of the land has a ready developer. 3. Tabulation of Land Disposal Estimate (see following pages). 4. Modest modifications only may result in the land disposal estimate as data shown is predicated on the reuse appraisal study of the parcels noted on the Disposition Map. In addition, the "LPA's Estimate" includes 12,994 .square feet that is included in the dollar tabulation, but not identified on the map. The reason for the inclusion is that the parcel may have to be acquired if the present owner does not conform to the objectives of the Urban Renewal Plan. The estimated reuse value of the land is $.30 per square foot or $3,900. 5. Site clearance work and project improvements will be furnished by the St. Paul School Board (City of St. Paul) in the Technical - Vocational School Site Area - Disposition Area No. 1 (See Map No. 20, Disposition) . On the remaining sites within the project area no site clearance work or project improvements are to be undertaken by redevelopers, except for interior access roads and such other activities necessary to reconcile the developed use and the public utility and right -of -way lines which, conventionally, are the obligation of the builders. Subject report (See R 224, Project Improvement Report) identifies site clearance work and installation of project improvements to be provided by the City of St. Paul School Board within Disposition Parcel No. 1, for which non -cash - local grant -in -aid credit is being claimed. IWM • segments designated for public and non - profit institutional uses (accompanied by the required supportive data and information),will be furnished by the LPA for the HHFA concurrence when later requested within the time limits indicated to assure expeditious conveyance and fulfillment of plan objectives. Land Disposition Policies, Methods and Procedures: The land disposition policies, methods and procedures will be similar to the sale of land utilized in the Western Redevelopment Project presently on file with the HHFA. -5- • E7fz,s7l,L�r, �. 'zU L GZi2 ��ULa� MAR SHALL AT FARRINGTON C. W. HAUTZENRADER, MINISTER 1829 DAYTON AVENUE :.:r. 1lilliam R. Carter lousing and Redevelopment Authority 55 East Fifth Street Saint Paul 1, Kinnesota Dear Mr. Carter: SAINT PAUL 2, MINNESOTA September 24, 1962 On September 12 the Official Boarc. of Yirst Christian Church voted to request the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to make available 3 acres of land for parking space and future expansion of the Church acilities. It is desired that the land include the area bounded by _,rrington, Earshall and Virginia Streets, and a buffer area around tl:e present Church property. It is our understanding from confer- ences with you and Mr. Chapman th,:..t this area is presently being considered for the use of the two institutions in the 'vicinity. We received a communication from l+r. Chapman which included a parking diagram and a copy of the letter of September 20 to the uepartment of Education. We appreciate the information and the efforts of you and your staff to keep us informer, of developments in Cathedral Project I. Sincerely,, Bruce Miller, Chairman New Church Study Committee i 92 C January 28, 1963 C'. 1110114WIrsclu ATTORNEY -AT -LAW 242 UNWERSIT r AVBNUB SAINT PAUL. 3, MMNBSOTA CAPITAL 2 -4711 WILLIAM CARTER Executive Director Housing and Redevelopment Authority 55 East 5th. Street St. Paul 1, Minnesota Res Acquisition of land by St. Josephs Academy Dear Mr. Carters • . M RECEIVED JAN 2 9 1963 Housing & Redev, a Authority /�. St. paw, Minn. I am writing you on behalf of the Sisters of5t. Joseph and St. Josephs Academy regarding a square block of land located North of St. Joseph Academy, bounded by Western, Carroll, Iglehart, and Virginia Avenues. This land is in the proposed Cathedral Redeveopment Project by the Board of Education and Housing & Redevopment Authority. For sometime St. Josephs Academy has been contemplating acquiring this property in order to provide parking and an out- door gymnasium area for the students of St. Josephs Academy. They had authorized The Lentsch Company, Inc., as agent, to acquire the property, but in view of the proposed acquisition by the Board of Education for technical school development, they have been forced to hold their present plans. I have been asked to represent them in approaching the Housing & Redevelopment Authority and the Board of Education to determine whether or not this square block could be set aside for thei-r acquisition, or acquired by the Housing & Redevelop- ment Authority, and then sold to St. Josephs Acaden;r. I would appreciate your contacting me at your earliest convenience to advise as to what steps might be taken to arrange a meeting with you, as representing the Housing & Redevelopment Authority and /or a meeting with the Board of Education,to present on behalf of the sisters,their plan for developing the subject property. Kindly let me hear from you, in this matter, at your earliest convenience. Aery truly yours, nald C. „�,exitsah DCLssjk ip • "ONAXXi C. 1[.1ENFrS (C1E1[ ATTORNEY -AT -LAW 242 UNwmiTY AVENUE SAINT PAUL 3, MINNESOTA CAPITAL 24711 February 7, 1963 WILLIAM CARTER Executive Director Housing & Redevelopment Authority 55 East 5th. Street St. Paul 19 Minnesota • Re: Acquisition of land by St. Joseph's Academy in the Cathedral Redevelopment Area Dear Mr. Cartert r �,+ o RECERTI; " FEB 9 1963 5 Housing & Redev. ! i Authority St. Paul, Minn. To summarize our meeting with you and Dr. Conners, of the Board of Education, and to further emphasize the position and needs of St. Joseph's Academy, I again state that St. Joseph's Academy is vitally interested in land located in the Cathedral Redevelopment Area. As I stated in our meeting on Tuesday, the land that is needed for expansion is that land located North of St. Joseph's Academy, bounded by Western, Carroll, Iglehart and Virginia Avenues. If this land is made available, it will be used as a parking and gym area for the student of St. Joseph's Academy. In the not too distant future, some of the land will be used for the construction of additional facilities urgently needed in the expansion of St. Joseph's Academy. The parcel of land to which I refer is the most advantageous location for this ex- pansion and development. Any arrangement for joint use of other property with other institutions, public or private, would not suit the purposes of St. Joseph's Academy. I strongly urge and sincerely request that you and the Board of Education do everything possible to set aside this specified parcel of land for St. Josephs Academy, to be acquired by them after the Development Authority has completed negotiations with the present owners of the property. If there is any further information or facts of a concrete nature which you think necessary to further aid St. Joseph's Academy in obtaining this parcel of land, please contact me at your earliest convenience so that I can supply whatever information and facts you deem necessary. Very truly yours, onald C. Lent ch DCLtsjk (Housing SHELDON L. COHEN ATTORNEY AT LAW ED 962 Hl. 2-6261 — 4365 NORTH 27TH STREET edev. MILWAUKEE 16, WISCONSIN nn. V June 12, 1962 Mr. B. B. Chapman , Director of Planning Housing and Redevelopment Authority 55 East Fifth Street St. Paul 1, Minnesota Dear Mr. Chapman: On behalf of the Housing Advisor to the International President of American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, I-wfsh to take this opportunity to advise your Authority of AFSCME's desire to assist in whatever way you deem necessary through its sponsorship of low- middle income and relocation housing under Sections 221 (d)3 and (d)4 respectively. We are advised that you are in the survey and planning stage for the CATHEDRAL NEIGHBORHOOD project (Minn R -17) . In viewing the proposed general area with you, your writer noted the general characteristics of the area adapt well to both clearance and rehabitation. Being well aware of the fact that the success of any renewal efforts through clearance directly depends on the ability to relocate displaced families, I am authorized by the Housing Advisor to the International President of AFSCME to offer their sponsorship of whatever number of units is deemed necessary, not to exceed 400 in number. We shall work with your Survey and Planning Department in an effort to devise the best in break -down of types to cover one, two, three and four bedroom units. It is desired that prior to any decision on the distribution of these units your office furnish us with copies of surveys made that will warrant such distribution and quantities. It is usually desirable to have developments of 100 units or more in any one site. In this way improvement costs and construction costs are kept at a minimum. The method of purchase of any land on which this sponsor will build shall be on a "residual" basis. The sponsor feels that if a true need exists, then the Authority in cooperation with the city shall determj.ne: 1) a need exists; 2) number of units necessary; 3) rental range; 4) distribution of unit sizes. The sponsor then can make a determination of that amount which will be left for land. If the land price were a fixed item, rental would have to give. As long FILL �. �� 0 0 Mr. B. B. Chapman, Director of Planning June 12, 1962 -2- as the four criteria above are met, any price that FHA approves in their commit- ment is an acceptable price for the land in the eyes of AFSCME. Please have it understood that the primary interest of this sponsor is sociological. This sponsor is not in the housing business, but upon request sponsors non - profit housing ventures to assist a city in its urban renewal efforts. Since the city is the Union's employer, whatever this Union can do to assist its employer in the solution of its problems is one of the aims of AFSCME's housing interest. It is necessary, therefore, that the disposition of any land by your Authority to this sponsor must be by negotiation, as this is the only way the four criteria above can be met. This sponsor is still interested in the development of Parcel 10, Western Redevelopment Area. Its proposal of last May still stands, modified, however, by the fact that rent could be reduced approximately $15.00 per unit if advantage is taken of the below market interest rate program under Section 221 (d)3. If for any reason your present negotiations with Hanover Development do not fully materialize, please advise us of the desire to proceed along the line which I have outlined herein and the Union shall take necessary steps to determine feasibility. This can be had within ten days. Perhaps the development of Parcel 10 can be the opening wedge to permit clearance in the CATHEDRAL NEIGHBORHOOD. Thank you once more for your inquijSince ssured of the assistance of AFSCME if desired. you s Coh SLC:eb • R 226 COST ESTIMATE AND FINANCING REPORT • R 226 • CJ 1. Form H -6200, Project Cost Estimate and Financing Plan is attached. 2. Statements in support of estimates of non -cash local grants -in -aid are included in R 2241 Project Improvements Report; including net costs of site clearance work; services and basis of estimates of project improvements; evidence that each facility, to the extent of allowance claimed, is necessary to serve and support uses of land (including maps and figures). 3. Data in support of sharing Net Project Cost (Form H -6200) will be submitted during Part II: description of arrangements and evidence of fund availability with respect to local grants -in -aid and proposed cooperation agreements. 4. Form H -6220, Project Expenditures Budget and supporting statements for same are attached. 5. Form H -630, Local Public Agency Staffing and Salary Schedule is attached. 6. Form H -6121, Data; Supporting Project Expenditures Budget and supporting statements for same are attached. 7. Project on three - fourths grant basis is not applicable. • • SUPPORTING STATEMENTS - Form H -6220, PROJECT EXPENDITURES BUDGET Line 2a: Administration 1410.01 - Form H-630 1410.09 - Retirement Contributions (FICA and Pension - total salary and chargeable to project is $156,911 @ 7 %) 1410.16- Pamphlets and Annual Report 1410.19 - Sundry Overhead Telephone and Telegraph (Total annual office expenditure of $5,848 @ 20% (chargeable to project) x 4 years) $ 41676 Office Rental (Total annual office expenditure of $19,278 @ 20% (chargeable to project) x 4 years) 15,420 Office Supplies (based on previous experience) 5,000 Postage, Freight and Express (based on previous experience) 2,000 Printing and Reproduction (based on previous experience) 3,000 Insurance (general @ $600 - fidelity @ an annual amount of $450 x 20% (chargeable to project) x 4 years = $360 Workmen's Compensarion @ $250) 11210 Electricity (based on previous experience) 680 Advertising (based on previous experience) 800 Miscellaneous 11500 Subtotal $341286 Line 2b: Travel Out of Town Travel: Title Destination No. of Trips Commissioners URA 4 Commissioners NAHRO 2 Counsel 'Reglional Office 4 $49,240 101983 2,000 Estimated Cost $ 350 300 350 Title Destination No. of Trips Executive Director Regional Office 5 Executive Director NAHRO Conference 4 Finance Director Regional Office 2 Planner Regional Office 3 Planner NAHRO 1 Relocation Officer NAHRO 1 Director of Develop- 3 ment Regional Office Director of Develop- 1 ment NAHRO Travel allowance for staff vehicles - Based on reimbursement of $0.10 per mile for private vehicles, it is estimated that the staff will travel 3,000 miles per year. 3,000 miles per year @ $0.10 per mile x 4 years Line 3 - Office Furniture and Equipment: Ten -key electric adding machine Fireproof filing cabinet (3) Electric typewriters (trade) Map cabinet Total line 2b $325 300 450 200 Subtotal Estimated Cost $ 375 600 150 225 150 75 225 150 '.$2j950 $1,200 $4,150 $1,275 • '• Line 4 - Legal Services: R 1410.024 (Form H -630) $12 180 In addition to staff salaries, a sum of $3,000 is included for necessary legal counsel. 3,000 $15,180 Line 5 - Survey and Planning: R 1410.021 $ 2,800 Other expenses 11200 $ 4,000 Line 13 - Interest: Lines B -21 B -12 plus 8 -17 = $3,169,373 divided by 4 years = $793,124 per year for four years. Interest on $793,124 each of 4 years = (interest rate of 3.875; factor of 9419.35) $289,490,260, $2891490,260 __ dollar days: 9419.35 $30,735 x 4 (years)= $122,940 Line 16 - Contingencies: 15% of $648,313 = $971247 Line 18 - Project Inspection: .075 x $3,389,560 (lines 15, 16 and 17) $25,422 • • SUPPORTING STATEMENTS- Form H -6121 Line Narrative 1 . 1420.012 - Interest on Federal advances are estimated at $5,500 5 Survey and Planning - R1410.021 (Salaries) are estimated at $2800 Other expenses as needed $1200 Total $4,000 6 1440.03 - As needed 500 1440.04 - Title (Information) Examination and Insurance 17,800 The $17, 800 reflects the dif- ference between a total cost for -title examination and insurance of (244 parcels @ $100 /parce 1 ;) $24,400 and the $6,600 in the Survey and Planning Budget. It should be noted that this amount is substantially less when com- pared to the Eastern and Western Redevelopment Projects which was undertaken via registration . 1440.05 - Closing costs - Estimated 122 parcels @ $25 /parcel 3,050 1440.06 - Closing Costs on 122 parcels C $25 /parcel = $3, 050 50% of the parcels @ $200/ parcel (122 x $200) = 24,400 1/3 of (122) these parcels at $300 /parcel (40 x $300) _ $12,000. Tota 1 39,450 7a 1448.031) 236 structures at an average 1448.032) of $10 /structure = 2,360 1448.033) 1448.035) (based on previous experience) • • SUPPORTING STATEMENTS -- Form H -6121 (continued) Page 2 Line Narrative 7a (continued) 1448.034 - Insurance for structures and land liability $1,000 (based on previous experience) 1448.039 As needed 1,000 11 1445.01 Second reuse appraisal at $3, 000 and boundary surveys and maps @ $3,000 6,000 1445.03 Sundry disposition costs (as needed) 2,500 • Page 1 of 6 Form approved Budget Bureau No. 63- R908.2 • "200 (6-61) PROJECT LOCALITY HOUSING AND HOME FINANCE AGENCY SAINT PAUL, E URBAN RENEWAL ADMINISTRATION PROJECT NAME PROTECT COST ESTIMATE AND FINANCING PLAN CATHEDRAL AREA INSTRUCTIONS: Submit original and a second signed copy in Binder No. 1, and PROJECT NUMBER copies in Binders No. 2, 3, 4, and 5. SUBMISSION (Check and complete the description which applies) XJ ACCOMPANIES FINAL PROJECT REPORT REVISES PROJECT COST ESTIMATE AND FINANCING FLAN II SUBMITTED BY LPA ON 19 Al— DATED � 1, 19 Al ACCEPTED BY HHFA ON . 19 SECTION A. ESTIMATE OF GROSS AND NET PROJECT COSTS TO BE COMPLETED BY LPA TO BE FILLED IN BY HHFA yy INITIAL ESTIMATE NO E I TEM LATEST REVISED ESTIMATE ACCEPTED ESTIMATE ACCEPTED ESTIMATE BY HHFA (a) (b) (o) ITEM 1 OF GROSS PROJECT COST: $ $ $ TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES (from Form H -6220, line 20) A -1 3,558,482 ITEM 2 OF GROSS PROJECT COST (Non -Cash Local Grants -in -Aid): A -2 93,209 Cash value of land donations (from Supporting Schedule 1) A -3 Demolition and removal work (from Supporting Schedule 2) 42,618 A -4 Project or site improvements (from Supporting Schedule 3) 109,418 A -5 Public or supporting facilities (from Supporting Schedule 4) A -6 Other non -cash local grants -in -aid (specify type and breakdown of estimate on attached sheet) A -7 TOTAL NON -CASH LOCAL GRANTS -IN -AID (sum of lines 2 through 6) $ $ S A -8 GROSS PROJECT COST ( ITEM 1 plus ITEM 2) ( line 1 plus 7) $ 3,818,395 $ $ PROCEEDS FROM PROJECT LAND: A -9 $ 429,438 $ ; Sale price of project land to be sold A -10 Capital value imputed to project land to be leased A -11 Capital value of project land to be retained by LPA A -12 TOTAL PROCEEDS FROM PROJECT LAND (sum of lines 9, 10, and 11) $ 429,438 $ $ A -13 NET PROJECT COST (line 8 minus 12) $ 3,388,957 S SHARING OF NET PROJECT COST: A -14 $ 3,388,957 $ Net Project Cost df this project (from line 13) A -15 Net Project Cost of other projects (if any) pooled with this project — A -16 Aggregate Net Project Costs for this and other projects (if any) in the pool (line 14 plus 15) 3,388,957 A -17 Minimum local grants -in -aid required for this and other projects (if any) in the pool (113 or 1/4, as appropriate, of line 16) 1/129,652 A -18 (Less) Total local grants -in -aid to be provided for other projects (if any) in the pool A -19 (Equals) Minimum local grants -in -aid required for this project (line 17 minus 18) $ 1,129,652 $ i • Page 2 oft • H-6200 (6-61) SECTION A. ESTIMATE OF GROSS AND NET PROJECT COSTS (Continued) TO BE COMPLETED BY LPA TO BE FILLED IN BY HHFA INITIAL ESTIMATE LINE ITEM OR REVISED ESTIMATE NO. LATEST ESTIMATE ACCEPTED ACCEPTED BY HHFA ESTIMATE ia) (b) (o) SHARING OF NET PROJECT COST: (Continued) LOCAL GRANTS -IN -AID, THIS PROJECT: A -20 $ 259,913 Is $ Non -cash local grants -in -aid (from line 7) A -21 Cash local grants -in -aid 869,739 A -22 TOTAL LOCAL GRANTS -IN -AID FOR THIS PROJECT (line 20 plus 21) (must be not less than line 19) $ 1 129,652 $ $ A -23 PMJECT CAPITAL GRANT (line 14 ■inus 22) $ $ $ 2,259,305 A -24 RELOCATION GRANT (from Fors H -6220, line 21) $ $ $ 41,910 A -25 TOTAL FEDERAL CAPITAL GRANT (line 23 plus 24) $ $ 2,301,215 SECTION B. SOURCES OF FUNDS FOR PROJECT EXPENDITURES.AND RELOCATION PAYMENTS (Leave blank) ESTIMATE SUBMITTED LINE ITEM BY LPA ESTIMATE ACCEPTED NO. BY HHFA a) i b) B-1 Total cash requirements for project expenditures and Relocation I$ $ Payments (line A -1 plus A -24) 3,600,392 Cash local grants -in -aid: SOURCE OF CASH ACTUAL OR ANTICIPATED DATE OF RECEIPT B -2 $ S B -3 B -4 B -5 Real estate tax credits (from Fors H -6220, line 1b) _ B -6 Total cash local grants -in -aid (sun of lines 2 through 3) I$ _ S B -7 Total funds to be applied to project expenditures and Relocation Payments from short -term borrowings other than those on line B -9 below B -8 Subtotal (line 6 plus 7) $ $ B -9 PROJECT TEMPORARY LOAN THROUGH DIRECT OR PRIVATE FINANCING $ $ UNEM LOAN AND GRANT CCNTRACr (line 1 minus 8) 3,600,392 • Page 3 of 6 • H -6200 (6-61) SECTION C. FINANCING PLAN FOR CURRENT AND NEXT FISCAL YEARS (Commencing July I and Ending June 30) If project execution work will not start before the end of the next fiscal year or if a Contract for Lonn and Grant has been executed, check here I J and leave the rest of Section C blank. If project execution work will start during the current or next fiscal year and a Contract for Loan and Grant has not been executed, enter estimated starting date here: and complete Section C. FROM STARTING DURING DATE TO END NEXT FISCAL LINE I T EM OF CURRENT FISCAL YEAR, YEAR ENDING NO. JUNE 30, 19 J JUNE 30, 19 (a) ( b) C -1 Amount of Project Capital Grant Payments that probably will be earned a $ C -2 Amount of Relocation Grant Payments that probably will be earned Tentative Schedule of Short -Term Borrowings FEDERAL NON— FEDERAL NON— FEDERAL TOTAL TEMPORARY LOANS WITH LOANS WITHOUT LINE I TEM LOANS FEDERAL FEDERAL N0. GUARANTEE GUARANTEE (a) (b) (o) (d) C -3 Amount to be borrowed during current S S $ $ fiscal year C -4 Amount to be repaid during current fiscal year C -5 Amount outstanding at end of current fiscal year (line 3 minus 4) C -6 Amount to be borrowed during next fiscal year C -7 Amount to be repaid during next fiscal year C -8 Amount outstanding at end of next fiscal year (line 5 plus 6 minus 7) Acceptance of the estimates submitted is hereby requested. Date Signature of Authorized Officer Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of S�t:a Publ'Minney Title auI 'Minnesota HHFA ACCEPTANCE The estimates are accepted as indicated in the appropriate Columns. Date Regional Director of Urban Renewal, Region • Page 4 of & • H-6200 (6-61) SUPPORTING SCHEDULES SCHEDULE 1. LAND DONATIONS (Land Parcels or Land Interests) ESTIMATED (Leave blank) IDENTIFICATION NAME OF DONOR CASH VALUE SUBMITTED ESTIMATED CASH VALUE ACCEPTED BY LPA BY HHFA (•) See R -222 (b) (a) (d) LPA from State of Minn. - tax forfeit State of Minn. $ 19,045 $ LPA from City of St. Paul City of St. Paul 24,286 Dept. of Educ, from City City of St. Paul 46,176 School Board Street vacations - to excluded parcels from City of St. Paul 3,702 City CASH VALUE OF LAND DONATIONS (Enter on line A -2) $ 93,209 $ SCHEDULE 2. DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL WORK —NON –CASH LOCAL GRANTS –IN –AID (Include work which has been or will be provided) IDENTIFICATION OF DEMOLITION OR REMOVAL WORK JOBS NAME OF PROVIDING ENTITY ESTIMATED NET COST (Leave blank) ESTIMATED NET COS SUBMITTED BY LPA ACCEPTED BY HHFA (a) (b) (o) (d) BOUNDARY STREETS $ $ Curb and Gutter City of St. Paul 600 Sidewalk 234 Lighting " 80 Combination Sewer " 25 TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL SITE St. Paul School Board Combination Sewer 381 Pavement 21,793 Curb and Gutter 3,384 Sidewalk 1,504 Grading 2. It 12 780 TOT AND FEMOVAL WORK TO BE CHARGED TO ITEM 2 pF GROSS $ 1,260 Fs T (Enter on line A -3) SCHEDULE 3. PROJECT OR SITE IMPROVEMENTS —NON -CASH LOCAL GRANTS -IN -AID ESTIMATE SUBMITTED BY LPA (Leave blank) CHARGE TO PROJECT 1 ESTIMATE ACCEPTED IDENTIFICATION NAME OF PROVIDING ENTITY TOTAL COST BY AMOUNT ((e) x (d)) AMOUNT (a) (b) (o) (d) (a) (r) (L) Right-of-Way Acquis. Cit ) of St. Paul s 9,834 50 $ 4,917 i Street resurfacing 16,800 50 8,400 Pavement 11 7,957 0 31978 Curb and Gutter 5,015 50 2,507 Sidewalk 4,776 50 2,388 Landscaping It 2,525 50 1,279 Lighting (conversion) " 1,939 50 969 Lighting (new) " 28,656 50 14,328 Water Main " 2,520 50 1,260 Sewer 18,816 50 1 9,408 If a special assessment against project - acquired land is involved, apply the percent of direct benefit to the project from the improvement to its total cost and subtract from that amount the total amount of the special assessment against the project-acquired land. 0 Page 6 of 6 • H-6200 (6-61) SUPPORTING SCHEDULES (Continued) SCHEDULE 9. PROJECT OR SITE IMPROVEMENTS — NON -CASH LOCAL GRANTS -IN -AID (Continued) ESTIMATE SUBMITTED BY LPA (Leave blank) CHARGE TO PROJECT 1 IDENTIFICATION NAME OF ESTIMATE ACCEPTED BY HHFA PROVIDING ENTITY % AMOUNT % AMOUNT TOTAL COST ((c) X (d)) (a) (b) ( a) (d) ( a) Storm Sewers City of St. Paul $ 6,778 6.5 $ 441 $ it If 5,565 12.0 668 of If 10,768 5.6 625 " " 10,040 6.0 2,610 " " 17,254 9.0 1,553 " 5,827 9.0 524 " 9,574 15.0 1,436 " 8,915 0.4 1,819 111228 7.0 786 " If 24,801 8,432 k.0 TOTAL PROJBCT OR SITE Ib�iiOVEIfS TO BE CHARGED 'T0 $ :: S ITE14 2 OF GROSS PROJECT COST (Enter on line A -4) CONTIN ED SCHEDULE ll. PUBLIC OR SUPPORTING FACILITIES ESTIMATE SUBMITTED BY LPA (Leave blank) CHARGE TO PROJECT 1 ESTIMATE ACCEPTED BY HHFA IDENTIFICATION NAME OF PROVIDING ENTITY TOTAL COST % AMOUNT ((c) X (d)) % AMOUNT (a) ( b) (a) (d) (e) (f) (6) S $ S TOTAL SUPPORTING FACILITIES TO BE CHARGED $ :S TO PROJECT (Enter on line A -S) If a special assessment against project - acquired land is involved, apply the percent of direct benefit to the project from the improvement or facility to its total cost and subtract from that amount the total amount of the special assessment against the project - acquired land. FxLBa- Washington, D. C. E PagejNiiAWM 6 of 6 C7 H-6200 (6-61) SUPPORTING SCHEDULES (Continued) SCHEDULE $- PROJECT OR SITE IMPROVEMENTS —NON -CASH LOCAL GRANTS -IN -AID (Continued) ESTIMATE SUBMITTED BY LPA (Leave blank) CHARGE TO PROJECT l IDENTIFICATION NAME OF ESTIMBYEHHFAEPTED PROVIDING ENTITY AMOUNT TOTAL COST % ((c) X (d)) % AMOUNT (a) ( b) ( o) ( d) (a) ( f) (g) TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL $ $ $ SITE St. Paul School Board 28,247 100 28,247 Storm Sewer " ° 17,039 75 121779 TOTAL PROJECT OR SITE IMPROVDWTS TO BE CHARGED TO ............. ............................... $ ......... $ ITEM 2 OF GROSS PROJECT COST (Enter on line A -4) 109,418 SCHEDULE X. PUBLIC OR SUPPORTING FACILITIES ESTIMATE SUBMITTED BY LPA (Leave 61ank) 1 ESTIMATE ACCEPTED IDENTIFICATION NAME OF CHARGE TO PROJECT BY HHFA PROVIDING ENTITY TOTAL COST % AMOUNT ((c) X (d)) % AMOUNT ( a ) ( b ) ( o ) ( d ) ( e ) ( f ) ( S ) Park St. Paul $ $ $ School Board 86,280 17 14,668 TOTAL SUPPORTING FACILITIES TO BE CHARGED 9 t TU PROJECT (Enter on line A -S) 14,668 If a special assessment against project - acquired land is involved, apply the percent of direct benefit to the project from the improvement or facility to its total cost and subtract from that amount the total amount of the special assessment against the project - acquired land. FHLBB- Wuhlnelaa. D. C. r Fora approved Page 1 of 3 Budget Bureau No. 63 -8983 H-6220 (3-62) 1 For a project on a three - fourths capital grant basis, enter zero on Lines 1 through 8 and 12. PROJECT LOCALITY HOUSING AND HOME FINANCE AGENCY ST PAUL MINNESOTA URBAN RENEWAL ADMINISTRATION PROJECT NAME CATHEDRAL AREA PROJECT EXPENDITURES BUDGET PROJECT NUMBER BUDGET NUMBER MINN. R -25 1 INSTRUCTIONS: Initial Budget: prepare original and 8 copies for HHFA. Submit original and 4 copies in Binder No. 1, and copies in Binders No. 2, 3, 4, and 5. Revised Budget: If with amendatory application, follow "Initial Budget" in- structions. Otherwise, submit original and 4 copies to HHFA. DATES OF HHFA BUDGET APPROVALS (Complete for revision only) Budget No. 1, 19 Latest Approved Budget (No. ), 19 TO BE COMPLETED BY LPA TO BE FILLED USE ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET IN BY HHFA BUDGET LINE NO. 1 ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION BUDGET LATEST APPROVED ADUUSTMENT REQUESTED FOR APPROVED FOR BUDGET I+ or -! 48 MONTHS MONTHS (a) (b) (o) (d) 1 TOTAL SURVEY AND PLANNING ERPFSIDITURES (Includes all costs incurred, costs estimated to be incurred interest to $ $ 143,500 E and on advances repayment date (R 1401, R 1403, R 1404) 2 PROJECT EXECUTION EXPENDITURES: Administration: a. qq((dministrative overhead and services RR'09, R 1410.16, 96'509 R 1410.19, It 1416) b. Travel (R 1410.05) 4,150 3 Office furniture and equipment (R 1475) 13275 4 Legal services (R 1410.024, R 1415) 15,180 5 Survey and planning (R 1410.021, R 1430) 42,000 6 Acquisition expenses (R 1410.022, R 1440.02 90,608 through R 1440.06) 7a Temporary operation of acquired property - (—)4,551 Profit ( -) or Loss ( +) (R 1410.027, R 1448) 7b Amount included in Line 7a as real estate tax r — r L r L credits (R 1448.038) L 8 Relocation costs, excluding Relocation Payments shown on Line 21 (R 1410.023, R 1443) 29.,149 9 Site clearance- Proceeds ( -) or Cost ( +) ( )233,865 (R 1410.025, R 1450) 10 Project or site improvements (R 1410.026, R 1455) 25.,572 11 Disposal, lease, retention costs (R 1410.028, 29, 616 R 1445) 12 Rehabilitation and conservation (R 1410.029, R 1460) — 13 Interest (R 1420.013, R 1420.02) 1.22,940 14 Other income ( -) (R 1449) (-) (-) — (-) 1 For a project on a three - fourths capital grant basis, enter zero on Lines 1 through 8 and 12. • Page 2 of 3 �1_ 4-6220 (3-62) 15 Subtotal (sun of Lines 2 through 14, $ $ excluding Line 7b) 16 Contingencies (for Column (c), not to exceed 15% of Line 15) 17 1 Real estate purchases (R 1440.01) 18 1 Project inspection (R 1418) 19 TOTAL PROJECT EIIECUTION EXPENDITURES (sun of Lines 15, 16, 17, and 18) 20 TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES (ITEM 1 OF $ E GROSS PROJECT COST) (Line 1 plus 19) 21 1 Relocation Payments 10096 reimbursable to LPA $ $ (R 1501) $648,313 $ 97,247 ?,644,000 25,422 I 324142982 I $3355 8,482 $ I ................................ ............................... $ 41,910 $ l Approval of the Project Expenditures Budget in the amounts and for the time period shown in Column (c) is hereby requested. Date HHFA APPROVAL Local Public Agency Signature of Authorized Officer Title The Project Expenditures Budget is hereby approved in the amounts and for the time period shown in Column (d). The project shall be completed by , 19 - . Date Regional Director of Urban Renewal, Region TO BE COMPLETED BY LPA TO BE FILLED IN BY HHFA USE ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET LATEST APPROVED A(�USTMENT BUDGET APPROVED FOR LINE ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION BUDGET REQUESTED FOR NO. BUDGET l or —) 48 I MONTHS MONTHS (a) (b) (o) (d) 15 Subtotal (sun of Lines 2 through 14, $ $ excluding Line 7b) 16 Contingencies (for Column (c), not to exceed 15% of Line 15) 17 1 Real estate purchases (R 1440.01) 18 1 Project inspection (R 1418) 19 TOTAL PROJECT EIIECUTION EXPENDITURES (sun of Lines 15, 16, 17, and 18) 20 TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES (ITEM 1 OF $ E GROSS PROJECT COST) (Line 1 plus 19) 21 1 Relocation Payments 10096 reimbursable to LPA $ $ (R 1501) $648,313 $ 97,247 ?,644,000 25,422 I 324142982 I $3355 8,482 $ I ................................ ............................... $ 41,910 $ l Approval of the Project Expenditures Budget in the amounts and for the time period shown in Column (c) is hereby requested. Date HHFA APPROVAL Local Public Agency Signature of Authorized Officer Title The Project Expenditures Budget is hereby approved in the amounts and for the time period shown in Column (d). The project shall be completed by , 19 - . Date Regional Director of Urban Renewal, Region Page 3 of 3 • H-6220 (3-62) SUPPORTING SCHEDULE PROJECT OR SITE IMPROVEMENTS CHARGED AS PROJECT EXPENDITURES TO BE COMPLETED BY LPA TO BE FILLED IDENTIFICATION TOTAL COST CNARGE TO PROJECT IN BY HHFA % AMOUNT % AMOUNT E E � PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS Street Resurfacing 4,788 100 43788 Pavement 1,675 100 13675 Curb and Gutter 1,702 100 1,702 Sidewalk 1,392 100 1092 Lighting (Relocation & Con- version) 3,840 100 3,840 Lighting Conversion 511 100 511 Storm Sewer 3,850 100 3,850 (Advertisements and Maint. ($2,000) TOTAL P WE C GROSS SITE PROJECP VnEWIS TO HE CHAR( TO .i...i 3 17,758 7,75 FPI ENO -3 8.62.15650 PIRG Page 1 of 3 Form Approved Bud¢et Bureau No. 63- R922.1 • H -6121 (4 -61) HOUSING AND HOME FINANCE AGENCY URBAN RENEWAL ADMINISTRATION DATA SUPPORTING PROJECT EXPENDITURES BUDGET PROJECT LOCALITY SAINT PAUL9 MINNESOTA PROJECT NAME CATHEDRAL AREA INSTRUCTIONS: Prepare origin l and U copies for HNFA. If part of an initial or amendatory application, submit origin l in Binder No. I, copies in Binders No. 2, 3, 4, and 5. If not part of an application, do not submit in binders. PROJECT NUMBER MINN. R -25 Accompanies Form H -6220 dated May 1 19 63 H -6220 LINE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER EXPLANATION` AMOUNT CHARGEABLE TO BUDGET (a) LINE TOTAL (b) 1 R 1401; R 14103; R 1494 SURVEY AND PLANNING EXPENDITURES $ ] 3 8 0 Total estimated survey and planning costs other than interest R 1420.011; R 1420.012 Interest on Federal advances 5$500 R 1420.02 Interest on other borrowed funds — $ 14 3 5 0 0 LINE 1 TOTAL `,:.` 3 4 ADMINISTRATION OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT LEGAL SERVICES ......................:.. Entries on these lines of Form H -6220 shall be supported by a narrative statement explaining the cost esti- mates and the basis of any proration of the costs to this project. 5 ......... ................::..: : •;,, SURVEY AND PLANNING Attach a narrative statement describing the nature of the survey and 'planning work, including reference to any previous HHFA approval for such work in the project execution stage. 4 f 0 0 0 6 R 1410.022 ACQUISITION EXPENSES $ 2 9 ! 8 0 90,608 LPA salaries and wages - Acquisition ( from Form H -630) R 1440.02 Contracts for acquisition appraisals — R 1440.03 Option negotiations 500 R 1440.04 Title infiorsaatiow 17 9 8 0 0 R 1440.05 Sundry acquisition costs - Direct Purchase 39050 R 1440.06 Sundry acquisition costs - Condemnation 399450 LINE 6 TOTAL ..s 7a R 1410.027 TEMPORARY OPERATION OF ACQUIRED PROPERTY $ 3,239 I Ii I LPA salaries and wages - Management (prom Form H -630) R 1448.01 Gross income from temporary operation 12 s 15 0 CLASS OF LESSEE NO. OF �Rbt'e7t 2 AVERAGE RENTAL UNIT MOS. OF MGMT. TOTAL INCOME Residential 15 0 $ 4 0 /m 2 $ 129000 Commercial 1 5 0/m 3 150 Industrial — — — — Institutional * For a project on a three - fourths capital grant basis, enter zero on lines 1 through 8 and 12. Page 2 of 8 • H-6121 (4 -611 H -6220 LINE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER EXPLANATION AMOUNT CHARGEABLE TO BUDGET LINE TOTAL (a) (b) 7a TEMPORARY OPERATION OF ACQUIRED PROPERTY (Cont'd.) (Cont'd ) R 1448.031: Repairs and normal maintenance: janitorial wages and R 1448.032; supplies and watchmen wages; fuel. light, power: sewerage R 1448.033: R 1448.035 and water rentals g 2.,360 R 1448.034 Insurance 1'000 R 1448.036 Real estate tax payments — R 1448.037 Management contracts (staff) - R 1448.038 Charges in lieu of real estate taxes — R 1448.039 Temporary on -site moves 13000 $ ( —) 4 , 551 LINE 7a TOTAL (R1448.01 minus other amounts; if income exceeds costs, show as minus amount) . . ............................ 8 RELOCATION COSTS, EXCLUDING RELOCATION R 1410.023 PAYMENTS SHORN ON LINE 21 $ 29,149 LPA salaries and wages - Relocation (frog Fors.H -.630) R 1443.01 Contracts for relocation planning and execution $ 29,149. LINE_8 TOTAL ........................... :....................:.:....... ... ............................... 9 A 1410.025 SITE CLEARANCE $ 13.,566 LPA salaries and wages - Site Clearance (from Fors H -630) A 1450 Contracts for preparation of contract documents (staff) Net cost (+) or proceeds ( -) of site clearance work. exclusive of above amounts (See R 224) ( +) 220;222 Buildings and other structures (+)$ 177. b74 ... ..........:.................... .......... Sidewalks and pavements ( +) 20,127 ... ............................... ... ............................... ..................• ... ............................... Capping of utility lines ( +) 0 ... ............................... ... ............................... ... ............................... ... ............................... Li ht in (+ ) 264 ... ............................... ................... ... ............................... Advertisements & Maint ( > 2.000 ... ............................... " " "'.....` ...... " (Minus) Total credits for salvage and ... ............................... ... ............................... ... ............................... structures sold, if work will be done ............. .: ............................... by LPA force account br if such credits ... ............................... ... ............................... • are calculated separately for contract ... .::............................ .... ............................ work... ... ............................... ............................... ... ............................... ••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ... ............................... ... ............................... Site clearance work will be performed by LPA force account Contract ... ............................... ... ............................... Attach a narrative statement giving the sources and basis of estimates, including identification of any work involving unusually high costs. (not applicable - See R 224) $ 233,865 LINE 9 TOTAL 10 PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS LPA salaries and wages - Project Improvements (from Form N -630) R 1410.026 $ 5,814 A 1455 Contracts for preparation of contract documents (staff) - Project Improvements (from Form 9-6320, Supporting Schedule) 19,758 Attach a narrative statement giving the sources and basis of estimates of project improve- ments, or referring to such data in the accompanying Project Improvements Report. $ 25,572 LINE 10 TO3,AL . ...................::.......... • Page 3 of 3 CJ H -6121 (4 -61) H -6220 LINE NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER EXPLANATION AMOUNT CHARGEABLE TO BUDGET (6) LINE TOTAL (b) 11 R 1410.028 DISPOSAL, LEASE, RETENTION COSTS $ 21.,116 $ LPA salaries and wages - Disposition (from Fors H -630) R 1445.01 Disposition appraisals, boundary surveys, and maps 6 ! 0 0 0 R 1445.02 Commissions and fees R 1445.03 Sundry disposition costs 22500 LINE 11 TOTAL .... ............................... 12 R 1410.029 REHABILITATION AND CONSERVATION $ LPA salaries and wages - Rehabilitation and Conservation (from Fors H -630) R 1460 Contracts for technical and administrative services for rehabilitation and conservation program Attach a narrative statement giving the sources and basis of estimates of the above amounts. LINE 12 TOTAL 13 ............... ........................ :::..................... INTEREST ..................................... ...................................... ...................................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ... ............................... ... ............................... ............. Attach a narrative statement giving the sources and basis of estimates of interest costs. 14 h 1449 HER INCOME ... ............................... ................... ... ............................... .... ............................... $ Source of LPA income other than covered in Line 7a or 9 S LINE 14 TOTAL 17 REAL ESTATE PURCHASES ... ............................... Attach a narrative statement giving a Justification for the estimate for real estate purchases, including reference to appraisal reports and breakdown of estimated acquisition cost showing separately estimates for project land and compensation for consequential damage, if any, to real or personal property that is not to be acquired. Also include a schedule showing, on a quarterly basis, the proposed land acquisition activity for each segment of the project. 21 R 1501 RELOCATION PAYMENTS 100% REIMBURSABLE TO LPA $ li 1 10 CLASS OF PAYEE ESTIMATED NUMBER TO RECEIVE PAYMENTS ESTIMATED AVERAGE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TOTAL PAYMENTS Individuals Indiv Hshds 137 $ 10 $ 1, 0 Familiem 311 100 31,100 Business Concerns 1 2000 2, 000 LINE 21 TOTAL FHI,Bs- W.6h1.9tW. D. C. Io i�O .O N 10 O N m Pd by stO tad p m Op a.w d to v A [q E 'I • ,, .% 0-17 Vp W LoO(V OC+') O(D� [-Lr)OONNO)V) 00 (Db000 O O} m y W rr a,=(,� N O 00 Lo M (D m LO O (D r-I M m Cr) r- Cl CV N 00 r- w 00 .Zi- Cr) r-I O O py F ZJ(W7 ~G ,. as M w H (O r-I r-I r- w M H M LO OD 00 Q o y Q O m m w w '16 w LO M M N M n n n O M U) w w w w w w (n om'* 7� M w wN N CD w w w w O� Ei NI S F- " r-I ri M N M {ry N'ri H O to to to to to to cn v>v} tr} o ...... .... ..... z O =2mw C H W F- F- J a tn0N -�U n (O M O (D (O 0o _ _ M M _ M e -ft LO w Op �EO3c� = tl O N ] CL N1 W W J �"`• = C O LO LO U') LO C) m < r r l= L _ r--I N r _ N O Z Z O Z O J U R"1 t�nn U CO ri Z to 2 = CL CL W Hc7 O O caia JO V J o u« n M u 'a w x S W — '= N 1.0 l+i LO LO LO u > w W LO __ CO N= __= L N 1 u b Q z }. a O W O 4. J LLI J A b a i5 _ w W w W ^ J U o~ m O N O N O M O M 1 0 m �+ ` a� : O OD 00 :1- (D O :I- w w CD Oo V y V O M o O (D N (O �O (D m CD . =I— M LO CD O �• x N Fw r o w e tv LO 00 (D (O � O Lo O � ,* O Lo (D i• Q g b C�� t z « V « w w w w N 00 OD t.f) r .• M w w� w w w L, (D (D L, LA Lr (O w [: � e0 ri M I Z Q td < U t Q ti J zH a 0Q O H a �4 w 1-4 4j z LL. a) x •ri LL. y H a y u z z wa r_: >- i a�� z •� v ° v ti O a f� a) w U H 4-1 H r, W a a) • ri C/3 4a Cea+ +�- H z � w a w O Z� O A :D >~ O � W ✓ • ri • r1 4-) ,C� (1) . t a �. E v OLD > U f U� 4=1 4-) a ; a a A z r- > ri W rt O i0 C: r rd Q) Cl) wH a)wUH• a LH •ri(d(d OPao H r P4 Q c Q I 4J iJ 4J iJ iJ UD rd Q -� O Cn r-I O O U) .. ^ (4 • rd U) (1) rd O C; ^ I m Q ~ H • ri iJ C, W LO (D U • rl • r-I U C; rd M r Z N 00 (� O> a) 1 N N O O N N O iJ N N CL a W •ri 4-J 4J P C) C:) O OH U) U)ra iJ C) C) H C) C) « z X: F4 Z� O • • H ri a)QQ Cn >) • • H a) 0a O rd iJ O O E- r Cy UD +j O C) H b0 O O Q < z H O iJ Pr iJ $Lr U H r-i Q rd >) >) C; S-r %r r-I r-I C/] Q r-I ri C7 v H H .1 U O U) O v �' _r U U. • r-I r i• ri O Q) :j- :I- H - :j- U3 U W (1) 'r-I •r1 •ri P4 r i r-I O O iJ "A -r-I U) •r1 C1t r-I ri r-I H J O 7 F.r C'. fA U) I 1 t o r-I U) � P O I I a 1 1 w ri P4 P4 w a) U) rd rd O a) >`, P4 P4 C- N P4 P4 " b J x x N Q cA H P4 P4 F, W A. .... < u N v O } 2 F•!- O O Oo r-I L y ;b J LL O LLJ r= a co U (J to O rd rd LJ (q Z Q W a� o �O �O N v O N co a GAD fro N O PfT as �p o w O D a.aa .+ a tv v v 0 0 m W 00(VN(D.� (DOO M 00 0 000 OLn(V O 000 tprmv)- OLDrICnc-000)00J 000 0000 NrnNr-i 00 CL H rr a x - -I' r-1 t- N Lo M LO O r-I O r-I O O N Lo m m 00 m Q' (W� =JCW7 F-C �O W -1 a C O � 00 � m �' m N m� N 00 N Lt) m N r-I H r-I N m CO N U i!? �!} {/} {/} (R V)- vv w v v v z H ov�omLa - W F H J (L '•' 00 00 00 N CIA a Ltd r-i m c N -) - Xfa O N w 0 U 3 +Cr I r� - pVp z O P4 : � a f14 O w - W w J � � b O LA LO O m c EI r� N = _ _ _ _ = C14 N N C14 N = H o z m F m z J l F oW J W W -D 2 m C LL) u O O �� LL) _�'� b n 0 0 O • a CL v a J U c °« n It • a. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r-I r-I LIB LO aW W N Z - a~ <� o 0 0 4.) W W z LO - - - - - -- LO m m I I I 1 1 U W O. Spd LLI O d J W A z - y = „Wj W m m JI) LO LO O p ~ N = - _ _ - - _ = m m m - a rn LLJ S a O O (V (D (O (D N O O O (.0 N N V b r O W = = , OC)a)rINLnr,r_ 00O Or- r-I LO >- x N 1- )'o o•+ V N ONOOr-I r- mr- -t r1CD rl[� (DO gb w b V w w w w w w w w w w w w w w n co O Lo LO _-r m � tf) N Op rl l- (D Lo U J fz. O e «.w U V)- r-I H (D {i} r-I -ca {ii r-I -U> VY D J c W Z a w H H a ., z a H O w Z P� Cn 0 H w LL. n H z Q n :=) H rd. O a, a u ¢ r ao rn a � a H ,< ` v r-I rd a W r-I tv 4-J h0 M a W +J Q) 4) •f9 •ri ,p O H J O rd +J (1) 4 : co p � h +J T 1 r� H ar ar 0 U) 4) a e W H F U C, Q) rd -r-I rd rd U Q,' rb z rd >Q wa)a� a+Jur �>~ Cr — c w o > �+ U O >~ I w do 4-1 H a rd to o A - H ri •ri w W ~ H 4-4 b o N N r- � H � bA � N CO 4-1 QH•r r- r-i CO S �+ P4 O rn Q,' 4-1 F•r U -r-I •ri N N O +J Q) N (V CV O Q) (14 N fZ Q) O >, rd U �: A. +J iJ C/) a O o o +J s~ +J o 0 y W A >4 H> F-r O Q O >, Cl) C/3 o c9 F r rd U, J c c� z H U) ri Q) 'rd A •rl •H r-� 1 0 0 o z 0 rd r 0 0 H +J U +J rC: P +J I $�r P -:I- r-I r-I r-I H +J +J N 14 r-I H V U z::I r. 4) U O 0 ,S4 0 O ri a � -t zj- z U cn +J O .t zt C ,; r CD H U rd �4 +J •ri Q) P -r-I 'r-I I Q r-I r1 H Q) •ri 4-1 •rI H r-I •-L co z W � N C" U •rl I~ U Q) r- i-. P4 Ur I 1 I � �r N rd r- 1 � b. a H x A �C • r♦ U 3 O Q) r-I d) U v W P4 P4 P4 a rl cn r N P4 P4 JEn H 94 WcnU) hP4.UU3 U) PL, <AN .... 0 pq H L J X o a LL r z H o r I o O c�> a w a (D zr (D r-i Lo r-I o = mUJU N w LO vv 0, 9 c S x + _ �- V � DATE: MAY 89 1963 For Z'he HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ST. PAUL REGARDING: APPLICATION FOR LOAN AND GRANT CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA I am a attorney -at -law admitted to practice in the State of Minnesota. As counsel for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, (.hereinafter called the "Local Public Agency ") in the above- identified project, my opinion, including certain factual statements requested by the Housing and Home Finance Agency, is as follows: 1. I have reviewed the Legal Information submitted on HHFA Forms H -6103A and H -6103B as part of the Survey and Planning Application of said Local Public Agency, dated December 21, 1961, for the Cathedral Area General Neighborhood Renewal Plan; I have made an examination of applicable State law and am of the opinion that since the date of the submission of said Legal Information there has not been any court decision, statutory or constitutional enactment, or any revision or amendment of any State or local law requiring any change or supple- mentation of the Legal Information submitted as aforesaid, and that the said Legal Information as of the date of this opinion is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct. 2. I have reviewed the Application for Loan and Grant, dated May 1, 19639 and approved by the Local Public Agency on May 8, 1963, for Project No. Minn. R -25, including particularly the data and information.relating to (a) the size -A M U ti For The HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ST. PAUL DATE: MAY 89 1963 REGARDING: APPLICATION FOR LOAN AND GRANT PAGE TWO CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -259 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA and character of the proposed project area, (b) the proposed project, (c) the activities to be undertaken by the Local Public Agency in carrying out the proposed project, and (d) the proposed method of financing the project. S.• To the best of my knowledge, there is no pending or threatened litiga- tion.of any kind concerning said project. 4. I am of the opinion that the Local Public Agency has been legally created and is a duly organized and acting public body having the legal power to undertake, carry out, and finance the project and project activities des- cribed in the application in the manner set forth therein after completion of the following actions: (a) Public hearing held by the Common Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, upon the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.5219 Subdivision I. (b) Approval of the Redevelopment Plan by the Common Council of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, upon finding by that body, (1) that the land in the project area would not be made available for redevelopment without the financial aid to be sought, (2) that the redevelopment plans for the redevelopment areas in the locality will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound 7 y_N W[lp^ r'e' G yty, a (O DR<A 9 o , IttiN , �a < ��c�iNr TM •GSy,cOl� U DATE: MAY S, 1963 ! For The HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ST. PAUL *. fly s�i� _��`� REGARDING: APPLICATION FOR LOAN AND GRANT PAGE THREE CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA needs of the locality as a whole, for the redevelopment of such areas by private enterprise, and (3) that the redevelopment plan conforms to a general plan for the development of the locality as a whole, all pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521, Subdivision 2. 5. I am of the further opinion, on the basis of the data and information submitted in support of the application: (a) That the proposed project area meets the requirements of State law, particularly Minnesota Statutes, Sections 462.415, 462.421 and 462.445, for undertaking the proposed project activities and carrying out the proposed project therein. (b) That the proposed project area is, within the meaning of Section 110(c) of Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, a predomin- ately residential area. (c) That -the project and project activities described in the application are consistent with the Urban Renewal Plan which has been prepared _ for the proposed project area. i,/ For The M " N HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF -ST. PAUL` . .. �c R . Syr' r ,. `? ,_ - - - - - • - = - A•TTORN_ EY. , _ _� � ., - •. .. _ ,S OPINION_ _ DATE:-- my, O REGARDING:_ -'WBAN & PLO ftft TW = , _ ^ ��.r,�ti��T� fit! -��, �'�"; �e�i1�., ��" � _ ... _ - - - _ . '• - -•- �- - • ,. --' _ .ter ' 1r - . � • ... i so to attoftiEwY*at -liar a %ittad- , frsaUct In t'h* SWO G; m*l*t4. Authotity of t6 �*ty "tot As domm tor the aide"I" �wli�'i1r1r!lio�ra� 11?4'aitlaltx= rasd.tie'crlbi so; dt'i9,. aV M14. r d+ mtif i* p*ol *o ,ter of �t a�i, a1vr�#I ctu ' a a r►r�ll� a +giigi d by the _: `.>M�l1E� _ , F- �,_.oa�lat ��n��i .��_ �' �D��. - �- -� -•r � ' '�'°' t -` �' ';'_ A - . ' - - •_ - �.- h �±i1 $f b they r " p Y _ Rod,". 4 Mr t Au on y t G . y p# i�ir>t vain} 'msra iotoi -. 4rA ' 't+ the at d ai i>~ ,Ran U��a' 4425, try o csty, �f stint f��w�i r + '440ty of- �Ukta_ 'af � ataip (h* fts* 1041160 00 'iW)o doh Y - Flan: �s �ox� �r�+toif3,etaRl��y ii�t�i��sd • as • �fQl��nti , - � .._ o - . A p riatsd_ -&cuwt dated' y'-l. Igo t est Ann Vrban Its"ml F"4"t 1l• "s oa s #ng trey y rig" ; W4 fout 44) ashlbits, for tbo p aat: r s • 3n tiyti f C1��M13�'� p 9aat• 24 uA, pion io ,fam w4 $Wit& .iii io aaogrd with appXtoola I *w: - Thit . Fairto 'wwl c ' # yam_ a$# of -tht Qtty o3 9siut -Paul.$ - _ socl affair riril3tan smart by Oparo a# thw (3ty of, Wat- h , Fa�ui� , i3nrw tar +viii bad. ak _valid Flan p�s�3i>K� all �i o >I��ir lrtita �� r�ta or The M N f HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ST. PAUL , - G cvuo�y ° - ATT0- RNE.YS- OPINION DATE: REGARDING-.-.- . AN 84 W AL ; - ! . WIVA �i 3 $OG>AX ► WW Tit! "I �Of th! 4I* - A6t .bf_ 1949 "t ply li . 'her "ter rlts4iai a 6mroO . f! P100, i4thli><, th! t iatl u�l i tici l of tho L6ad alts �; q # ta• sil,`ls�sl._ s l s. • PoAsinir Eo tiii loot Q H toy►. 11 t�ai� 'y!� -lr t i fill # irw,_ *uCb _ qtr- t titan -404 1001.1 is 14001ty.+rr114 *10 I �Facw��s�i�►�+li for .: +A*, rodeiir�lli E3 tr'r�a a�'v� t i�. _ VOWAl06ti9n tativitlss wiempl>at+Mt4 T under the P14m. 4_ � ' - - �� ' `'�� .ih� �i�r�,• �ti�# - 1'- CIi,�,.'�1'�V�,�iO�s�• �r,�l�>r.� #'�' d�rxt�� _ , ' ,__ a otri ' t i s 3rl�raluQ�ld ti v t, td.Stst� or 14 *4 id ' .. • F. ow 'AG `• .. {? dT �'�• fix. a � . =l'T j' ' ' -'- �b - 'f#► Pain l do epos 0 r . _On* Oftatt . P "rte *414 the- 400,01 Polio: -A9 1 Is to • *c Est obit 1M. 61, xisat to + ?► ,�, 16614doo, sppvo Alt*. 0010 - ; for thir' s; F lo►r►, 61, 6 � *0_1* irk' sr ** Ar "ts~ of :the _ �*l o ff' lTk' 0#qt "03*jQ For The d' M u N n HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT- AUTHORITY OF THE CITY ST. PAUL ATTORNEYS ;O_ PINION - - a - � v E 'may _ :' - .-- - r .-.. •, '. � _• - ,• - - ' DATE: my, 0 - 1 90, REGARDING: 0 w11AL:' �{{��{•{�. "?y+`'j�j% r��- ``� . } t� Y t - �- _' ' - • -WOOMa �r A' �[*.^1M��, M�n��T ■,w�efre'rw� ' a'i I 11 i f i ' e - ' .. ' _ ��ii��s�l ��a, p_A�r+j �3i71�:�r�.A!x �" _ -., -. • _ - - y ={ ' - - - - yy.��•� �y 1y •�j� i - _/�_, -�, ■.{ !r�Zy!^�: 16 R 'j� ; - ♦ - .• '• •�: ►.e. N qr 7 ♦, y! �.!T � . � M i� � ITT Fa •`�" b* ._"dw to to v6eth rr it C*04�m&_ tq t a �� a►r► b � �� ", . w i r. - o Ind �►t ►�1�0 kilt, Abj*ot4v*& vosp c tag: R sal 3&W v r 'ia+v�d?►1ic is pc>'ztiito« c1 ± 1r .ul1tiler prov iioiia . 1o_ the Pl �i_ ve3 .log 104 +awo bui141 .�cirr ► s r- a�oto i +r�i„ Ia 3 . �R otho vio ph i. t r+r 1► .> o t!it Stato road 20001 lol ' . r qui lrn s':oP' - ) P s � i a thy. 4tl .ar4 + 1Cmitto .tr# Y - tla wyt�d for It in+tri 'or #i11d1 -cost . � *2 Qgw Ain In �Cwxd wits stilts, 001 0 ,' &W the- G4'►n *1g,4 1�� e p 3s A t »i!1', Q tom' ro 00 oaorlbo tiomo . - ±psis o'lwoy OXV;w alw_ 409 ly oftot., - -•- M,' .. -- , � '' �, - =.-= _ • -- -` 'For The •'�_ a - - -- •' _ u .^' _ HOUSING` AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ST. PAUL . G ' cvno'v` k w + ATTORNEYS .OPINION Z •''AUL. MINK «a • '- , _ _ - - '- - - - - - DATE: RAY 'g j _1 REGARDING: (f) .The iaov'i016& I .plan -00111 IN APO polod,' -0 ovirstloo I ` 10 X Sip'" a' py k !rl> * o"-Ii .�n+o per y[�jQ. a ei#�e # x . i 7y j?{�/' a' J - ' "M- � Via' Wi'' �y.ky I> 1"o . *wf"v* the Plan# : CERTIFICATE OF RECORDI14G OFFICER The undersigned hereby certifies that; 1. He is the -duly qualified and acting Assistant Secretary of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, (herein- after called the "Local Public Agency ") and the custodian of the records of the Local Public Agency, including the minutes of the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and-Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, (hereinafter called the "Governing Body "); and is duly authorized to execute this certificate. 2. Attached hereto is a true and correct copy of a resolution, including the WHEREAS clauses, adopted at a meeting.of the Governing Body held on the 8th day of May, 1963. r 3• Said resolution has been duly recorded in the minutes of said meeting and is now in full force and effect. 4. Said meeting was duly convened and held in all respects in accordance with law and the bylaws of the Local Public Agency. To the extent required by law or said bylaws, due and proper notice of said meeting was given. A legal quorum of members of the Governing Body was present throughout said meeting, and a legally sufficient number of members of the Governing Body voted in the proper manner for the adoption of said resolution. All other requirements and proceedings under law, said bylaws, or otherwise, incident to the proper adoption.of.said resolution, including any publication, if required by law, have been duly fulfilled, carried out, and otherwise observed. 5. If the seal appears below, it.constitutes the official seal of the Local Public Agency and was duly affixed by the undersigned at the time this certificate was signed. If no seal appears below, the Local Public Agency does not have and is not legally required to'have an official seal. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 8th day of'May, 1963. (SEAL) ASSISTANT SECRETARY r _ , RESOLUT ION N0. 63 -5 /05 RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOP - MENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR LOAN AND GRANT FOR PROJ- ECT NO. MINNESOTA R -25 WHEREAS, it is necessary and in the public interest that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, avail itself of the financial assistance provided by Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, to carry out the urban renewal project described as Cathedral.Area Renewal Project and bounded generally by Beginning at the point of intersection of the southern-right- of-way line of Carroll Avenue with the western right -of -way line of Cathedral Place, then southerly along said line of Cathedral Place to the point of intersection with the southern right -of -way line of Marshall Avenue, then westerly along said line to the point of intersection with the easterly right -of- way line of Arundel Street, then northerly along said,line to the point of intersection with the northern right -of -way line of- Marshall Avenue, then westerly along said line to the point of intersection with the western right -of -way line of Arundel Street, then northerly along the said line to the point of intersection with the southerly right -of -way line of the alley (or extension thereof where no alley exists) between Rondo and Carroll Avenues, then easterly along said alley line 263.375' to the point of intersection with a lot line, then southerly along said lot line to the point of intersection with the southern right -of -way line of Carroll Avenue, then.easterly along said line to the point of intersection with the western right -of -way line of Cathedral Place which is the point of beginning, and hereinafter. referred to as the "Project "; and WHEREAS, it is recognized that the Federal contract for such financial assistance pursuant to said Title I will impose certain obligations and respon- sibilities upon the Local Public Agency and will require among other things: (1) the provision of local grants -in -aid; (2) a feasible method for the reloca- tion of families displaced from the project area; and (3) other local obligations and responsibilities in connection with the'undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects. L' T 0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA, That an Appli- cation on behalf of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, for a loan under Section 102(a) of said Title I in the amount of $3,6003392.00 and for a-Project Capital Grant and a Relocation Grant to the full amount available for undertaking and financing the Project is hereby approved, and that the Executive Director is hereby authorized apd d1rected to execute and to file such Application with the Housing and Home Finance Agency, and to provide such additional information and to fuxnish� such documents as may be requ�red in behalf of said Agency, and to act as the authorized.correspondent of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota. •M ! , , • `. r i � • • -' ' • • , • it SAMRLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Publication of the Notice of Hearing on Redevelopment Plan will be made iri the Saint Paul Pioneer Press and Dispatch, a newspaper of general circulation ih.the- City of Saint Paul, Minnesota. -First publication -will be ten days prior to the, date of public hearing. Second publication will be made seven days following first publication. The following is a sample of such a notices _ n NOTICE OF HEARING ` OW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be had before the Council.in the City of Saint Paul in 'the Council chambers in-the Court House in the City of Saint •Paul on the day of , 19 , at o'clock upon •the redevelop- ment plan presented by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City -of Saint Paul, Minnesota, for the area generally referred to as ' The area embraced by the redevelopment plan is as follows:. The boundaries set forth,herein'_are approximation's, exact boundaries -and detailed - �legal,,descriptions are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Saint . Pau1,386 Court House, and of '.the Housing•and- Redevelopment Authority of the City of FSaint Paul,- Minnesota, 55 East Fifth Street.' Maps, charts and other details of the ro osed redevelopment p p plan are on file in the 'office of the Housing and Redevelopment:' Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota.and may be "inspected during regular ' business hours. The purpose of the - hearing, of which notice is hereby given, is to'-consider the rede- velopment plan for the above described anea and determine whether it shall be approved permitting the Housing and Redevelopment.Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota to acquire land in the above described area and otherwise proceed,to carry out the said plan pursuant to the prbvisions of the Minnesota Munic.ipal,Housing and Redevelopment Act and of Title I of the�Housing'Act of 1949 as amended. All persons and organiza- -tions interested in this matter-will be given full opportunity to be heard. City Clerk Dated 119 ; 0 9 MAPS MAPS r--.j I � ST. Iwl ICI IUI tl II I u ; ' � b a,` _ 1 rm DAY E O I r I r� BOUNDARY MAP ��--- ` =. .... � .............................. AVENUE PROJECT R 0 Ly FREEWAY ACQUISITION ............•• FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PROJECT BOUNDARY I I lal I I I I I I C I I AVENUE CAR' — — — — — el I ILI W I O I I � cn = I o I x aa�_�. I u ; ' � b a,` _ 1 rm DAY E O I r I r� BOUNDARY MAP ��--- CLEARANCE SECTIONS PROJECT ACQUISITION FREEWAY ACQUISITION ............•• FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PROJECT BOUNDARY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N 0 200 400 600 CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY It 1963 maD no. 1 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES j URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 1 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS z Y PROPOSED LAND USE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM -HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PUBLIC PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS, AND OPEN SPACES INSTITUTIONAL RETAIL - COMMERCIAL I RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED IN SUBSEQUENT © PROJECT AT WHICH TIME THE WEI PROPOSED CONTROLS WILL APPLY Mc ELE' "•••••••••••• FREEWAY RIGHT —OF -WAY S PROJECT BOUNDARY jc. _=4 PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT V NOTE PLAN CONTROLS ONLY APPLY TO AREAS WITHIN THE ' PROJECT BOUNDARY ~s HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT :..... AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET ;: • • SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA •• 0 200 400 G00, �� CATHEDRAL AREA O URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 11 1963 mar) no. JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS II IWI Iir II-1 II.................... _J kl RIB I I I I I I I I I I I I II ■I I I I r I I Io I I iluA I I �1N I I I IE PROPOSED RIGHTS -OF -WAY .............. FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PROJECT BOUNDARY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N l 0 200 400 600 CATHEDRAL AREA' URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY It 1963 mar) no. 3 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2950 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED BY LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED BY CITY OF ST. PAUL -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED ®RIGHT BY STATE OF MINNESOTA -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED ®RIGHT IN SUBSEQUENT PROJECT RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE ACQUIRED BY CITY OF ST. PAUL _ RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE DEDICATED .............. FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PROJECT BOUNDARY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N l 0 200 400 600 CATHEDRAL AREA' URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY It 1963 mar) no. 3 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2950 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS • i i i0} . I /Z 13 14 h /0 I I I { %00 , 50 I _ 50 -- Joe---------- - I5 45 • STREETS Tr BE VACATED r Virginia Street - Iglehart to Carroll 18,575 QCarroll oy� ®�m0 4 0 • �I Iglehaxt Avenue - Arundel to 14' east of its -.0141 An 1 �� N 38,161 W Iglehart Avenue - Western to Virginia 11,630 1 Marshall Place - Virginia to 120' east of I Q' Farrington Farrington - Marshall Place to 5' north 12,515 I V• of Marshall Avenue 3,234 I -- Joe---------- - I5 45 • ►/�/ t�O 7 I� 4 I 12 O I ® Ci ® ` I O I 4L 6 19 Q'ti J w V i ./5 14 13 /Z /0 9 Bd Qi 5 /0 5, s 18 4>; \� : •.« «••• _ ©Q� // • 4 17 I AREAS NOT TO BE ACQUIRED h J ~ _•�**` k fir` � •' M i \ O V2 3 I6 ~'•< Parcel Area in 30 Q i16 /7\ /9 ZO 2/ 2Z 2 �� I QL. Number Owner's Name So. Ft. 0 • 13 14 16 17 16 �� t w 15 , _ V C 1 -1 State of Minnesota 44,750 66 I• I :O © O O C P " 2 -1 State of Minnesota 53,982 lyj ��• In 7 -13 Bernard F. Bjornstad (tentative + 55•+ I �_- �I exclusion) 12,994 1 '� �� 8 -1 St. Joseph's Academy 107,210 I� • IICJ 13 ; .6 12 -15 Trustees of Church of Christ 6,930 �. 14 � /9 � /Z � ll � /0 � •� I / /O 1 9 1 8 7 16 5 4 j t ' ;.tp Total Not to be Acquired 225,866 � ..1 i9 YF N E S1 I Parcel Area, Number Owner's Name sous I�e,u L E G E N D C 1 -2 State of Minnesota 20,25, 1 -10 East Side Investment 5,00 _.- . -.�.� PUBLIC OWNERSHIP NOT TO ACQUIRE 1 -11 Frances R. Luitjens 5,Oq 1 -12 Milt arie Simek 5,00 .King,etal 510q 1 -13 Marie Si PRIVATE OWNERSHIP TO ACQUIRE 1 -14 Herman C. Wilkes, et al 5,00 ' 45,25 •.....••••• -•••• PRIVATE OWNERSHIP NOT TO ACQUIRE C 2 -2 State cf �•'- nne3oLa 63,9581 -�� PUBLIC OWNERSHIP TO ACQUIRE 2 -21 Ralph Stacker, et al 1,836 2 -22 Florence M. Young 2,93$ BLOCK N U M B E R 2-23 John E. Blomquist, Inc. 3,745 2 -24 Helen L. Semper 3,745 2 -25 Mildred R. Johnson 5,214 12 PARCEL N U M B E R 2 -26 James B. Rooney 5,214 2 -27 Sarah Schapezy 5,214 ® VACATE S T R E E T TO AUTHORITY 2 -28 Julia Langhorne, et al 5,214 2 -29 Helene Fiquette 5,214 2 -30 State of Minnesota 10,428 2-31 Kathleen M. Gillis 5,214 NOTE OWNERSHIP DATA AS OF 1 -30 -63 2 -32 Vivian F. Amacher 5,214 10 2 -33 Pete Georgantonea, et al 5,214 0 2-34 Adelmo Casci 5,214 2 -35 Michael J. Condon, et al 5,214 2-36 John E. Blomquist, Inc. 15,540 O ' 2 -37 Marcel La Valle, et al 5,112 _I 2 -38 Pete Georgantones, et al 10,224 0 IV 2-39 Stephen J. Barthold, at al 1,864 2 -40 Maurice W. Rosenblum 2,112 0 2 -41 John E. Blomquist, Inc. 3,976 7 2 -42 Charles L. Hitsman, et al 3,976 t0 2 -43 Arnold O. Jacobson, at al 3,976 ]0 185,57 PROPERTY ', .A` AREA M 1A P C 3 -1 Philip arle S. Rosenblum 3,116 C AT rH E J R A i P �R 0 L C K 7 3 -2 Charles E. Bell, et al 2,280, L 3 -3 Aleksandrs Lidaka, at al 5,467 3-4 State of Minnesota 5,467 1� 7 3 -5 Minnie M. Yet ter 5,4671 �+ 3 -6 M. C. I:oschnnesots,etal 5,467+ HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 3 -7 State of Minnesota 5,467i7 3 -8 John E. Blomquist, Inc. 4,497 3 -9 Clair F. Londroche, et al 2,3651 3 -10 FrancesH.McGuire 2,1551 FIFTY -FIVE EAST FIFTH STREET, SAINT rPAUL I, MINNESOTA 3 -11 Marion M. Picht 3,386 3 -12 Peter E. Fooshe 3,574 o 3-13 Jchn F. Blcmquist, Inc. 3,223 0 100 300 a 3 -14 Teresa M. Crowe 5,467 FEET 3 -15 Norman J. Flynn, et al 5,467 3 -16 Emma H. Tews 13,66811 MAY 1, 1963 C.T. J.H.S. MAP No-4 3 -17 Wayzata Enterprises, Inc. 4,008- COMPLETEO PREPARED BY 3 -18 Marie M. Stute 2,863 3 -19 AxtAur E. Thor.., Inc. 1,260 STREETS Tr BE VACATED • Virginia Street - Iglehart to Carroll 18,575 QCarroll Avenue - Arundel to 197.4'west of Arundel 13,028 Iglehaxt Avenue - Arundel to 14' east of Western 38,161 W Iglehart Avenue - Western to Virginia 11,630 ' V Marshall Place - Virginia to 120' east of I Q' Farrington Farrington - Marshall Place to 5' north 12,515 I V• of Marshall Avenue 3,234 I Total Streets 97,143 Total Acquisition Area 1,384,214 ►/�/ t�O 7 I� 4 I 12 O I ® Ci ® ` I O I 4L 6 19 Q'ti J w V i ./5 14 13 /Z /0 9 Bd Qi 5 /0 5, s 18 4>; \� : •.« «••• _ ©Q� // • 4 17 I AREAS NOT TO BE ACQUIRED h J ~ _•�**` k fir` � •' M i \ O V2 3 I6 ~'•< Parcel Area in 30 Q i16 /7\ /9 ZO 2/ 2Z 2 �� I QL. Number Owner's Name So. Ft. 0 • 13 14 16 17 16 �� t w 15 , _ V C 1 -1 State of Minnesota 44,750 66 I• I :O © O O C P " 2 -1 State of Minnesota 53,982 lyj ��• In 7 -13 Bernard F. Bjornstad (tentative + 55•+ I �_- �I exclusion) 12,994 1 '� �� 8 -1 St. Joseph's Academy 107,210 I� • IICJ 13 ; .6 12 -15 Trustees of Church of Christ 6,930 �. 14 � /9 � /Z � ll � /0 � •� I / /O 1 9 1 8 7 16 5 4 j t ' ;.tp Total Not to be Acquired 225,866 � ..1 i9 YF N E S1 I Parcel Area, Number Owner's Name sous I�e,u L E G E N D C 1 -2 State of Minnesota 20,25, 1 -10 East Side Investment 5,00 _.- . -.�.� PUBLIC OWNERSHIP NOT TO ACQUIRE 1 -11 Frances R. Luitjens 5,Oq 1 -12 Milt arie Simek 5,00 .King,etal 510q 1 -13 Marie Si PRIVATE OWNERSHIP TO ACQUIRE 1 -14 Herman C. Wilkes, et al 5,00 ' 45,25 •.....••••• -•••• PRIVATE OWNERSHIP NOT TO ACQUIRE C 2 -2 State cf �•'- nne3oLa 63,9581 -�� PUBLIC OWNERSHIP TO ACQUIRE 2 -21 Ralph Stacker, et al 1,836 2 -22 Florence M. Young 2,93$ BLOCK N U M B E R 2-23 John E. Blomquist, Inc. 3,745 2 -24 Helen L. Semper 3,745 2 -25 Mildred R. Johnson 5,214 12 PARCEL N U M B E R 2 -26 James B. Rooney 5,214 2 -27 Sarah Schapezy 5,214 ® VACATE S T R E E T TO AUTHORITY 2 -28 Julia Langhorne, et al 5,214 2 -29 Helene Fiquette 5,214 2 -30 State of Minnesota 10,428 2-31 Kathleen M. Gillis 5,214 NOTE OWNERSHIP DATA AS OF 1 -30 -63 2 -32 Vivian F. Amacher 5,214 10 2 -33 Pete Georgantonea, et al 5,214 0 2-34 Adelmo Casci 5,214 2 -35 Michael J. Condon, et al 5,214 2-36 John E. Blomquist, Inc. 15,540 O ' 2 -37 Marcel La Valle, et al 5,112 _I 2 -38 Pete Georgantones, et al 10,224 0 IV 2-39 Stephen J. Barthold, at al 1,864 2 -40 Maurice W. Rosenblum 2,112 0 2 -41 John E. Blomquist, Inc. 3,976 7 2 -42 Charles L. Hitsman, et al 3,976 t0 2 -43 Arnold O. Jacobson, at al 3,976 ]0 185,57 PROPERTY ', .A` AREA M 1A P C 3 -1 Philip arle S. Rosenblum 3,116 C AT rH E J R A i P �R 0 L C K 7 3 -2 Charles E. Bell, et al 2,280, L 3 -3 Aleksandrs Lidaka, at al 5,467 3-4 State of Minnesota 5,467 1� 7 3 -5 Minnie M. Yet ter 5,4671 �+ 3 -6 M. C. I:oschnnesots,etal 5,467+ HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 3 -7 State of Minnesota 5,467i7 3 -8 John E. Blomquist, Inc. 4,497 3 -9 Clair F. Londroche, et al 2,3651 3 -10 FrancesH.McGuire 2,1551 FIFTY -FIVE EAST FIFTH STREET, SAINT rPAUL I, MINNESOTA 3 -11 Marion M. Picht 3,386 3 -12 Peter E. Fooshe 3,574 o 3-13 Jchn F. Blcmquist, Inc. 3,223 0 100 300 a 3 -14 Teresa M. Crowe 5,467 FEET 3 -15 Norman J. Flynn, et al 5,467 3 -16 Emma H. Tews 13,66811 MAY 1, 1963 C.T. J.H.S. MAP No-4 3 -17 Wayzata Enterprises, Inc. 4,008- COMPLETEO PREPARED BY 3 -18 Marie M. Stute 2,863 3 -19 AxtAur E. Thor.., Inc. 1,260 • �i 0 PROPOSED ZONING V ' :3 •:1 . : :........... •. +'• . ••.'•.• X. #.:•. 1 m Y a 11C° RESIDENCE COMMERCIAL PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT RIGHT -OF -WAY © TO BE VACATED IN SUBSEQUENT PROJECT AT WHICH TIME THE PROPOSED CONTROLS WILL APPLY ...... k....... FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PROJECT BOUNDARY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N 0 200' 400 600' CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, M I N-N ES OTA MAY 11 1963 map no. 5 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL.AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4. ILLINOIS - ST. Iwi ICI INI II II RON :r I I , i I N I1ti II± DAY la�l II II II II J 1. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA a:•. :ti ° J� 0 200 400 600 P CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT J� MINNESOTA R -25 5 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 14? 1963 rmap no. b JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS EXISTING LAND USE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENCE AVENUE ® COMMERCIAL SEMI - PUBLIC z. PUBLIC VR VACANT PARCEL - RESIDENTIAL USE - - - - - - - - AyE.NU ...... WK—— FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY w PROJECT BOUNDARY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA a:•. :ti ° J� 0 200 400 600 P CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT J� MINNESOTA R -25 5 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 14? 1963 rmap no. b JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS 0 0 II Sl I i j IWI / IWI I I'- I I (wn I RO II u II I I � J 1. /_ _ •�::`.::.•: _ . . . . . . . ... .. C A 5 . .... . ................ om Rou am am am A i EXISTING ZONING '.B" RESIDENCE DISTRICT C" RESIDENCE DISTRICT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PUBLIC FREEWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PROJECT BOUNDARY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 0 260' 460' 6:00 CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R-25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY It 1963 map no. FolJACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD • HARRI So N 7-2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS 0 I I I� sT EXISTING RIGHTS -OF -WAY II Iwl 66/34 WIDTH OF RIGHT —OF —WAY/ PAVEMENT, IWI IN FEET Cn ICI I I ..... ............................... A ASPHALT ROl B BRICK . .... u I I Q C CONCRETE I 1 I� vii i I I I GOOD CONDITION 2 FAIR CONDITION I I I J — — — — — — �_— — — — 3 POOR CONDITION CA W PAVED STREETS (concrete base) ir I N I I _____= PAVED STREETS (non- concrete base) Cn I '2) I I _ Q 2 x = .............. 17 .... ...•• I FREEWAY RIGHT —OF —WAY I I 1 ••S a = PROJECT BOUNDARY I .66/34 II I I I NMI I �I I �I I DA NOD N N. M P q-.0 \DO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N l 0 200 400 600' CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 11 1963 man no. 8 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES TURBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS 1 a 0 9 I' 1 I I. EXISTING COMBINATION SANITARY r a STORM SEWER SYSTEM II IWI IWI - - - -- EXISTING SEWER LINE ICI ■••••••••• ..... ... 8 SIZE OF PIPE IN INCHES ,�� -1i • MANHOLE -�` —� DIRECTION OF FLOW Irl I� - I I ,. FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY Al PROJECT BOUNDARY 1 1111 1211 III _JII. u =x=15 =_�-- r � ♦ II I III � 151'11 g I 1 III •. ,1 I 1 I 1111 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT Its I 911 AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 9:1 I 1L' , 55 EAST 5th STREET . SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 1A '1 0 =1211 tea_ 0 200 400 600 gul - - -- — - -- �„� CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY It 1963 O ma p no. 9 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD • HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS ._ -aW._ IF _ II IWI IWI II—I Ito I I�I Ill 'A Well li I 1511 �P III r =j 111 111 n 9;1 I �I 111 ll I Jv� —4r —M �do I 9�1 • r ABANDONED STATE OF MEN • • • PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM - - - -- EXISTING SEWER LINE 811 SIZE OF PIPE IN INCHES O MANHOLE - -Q -- DIRECTION OF FLOW ............•. FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY ® PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPOSED SEWER LINE • PROPOSED MANHOLE SEWER LINE TO BE ABANDONED HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT •'• AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL ABANDONED a '• 55 EAST 5th STREET SCHOOL BOARD '•. � SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 1211 , II i II �� 11 I l 15 "ice 11 � � J N 0 200 400 600' CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 11 1963 map no. 10 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS S1 II IWI IWI R 1 "�— L•, j 121 I I I I I I-9 1 I I I II II' I I I I I I �OS IIOUTE 94 1 L INAGE SYSTEM 124 I''••!� II I I 1 I I I I I J 1 12411 to I II Z 21 I U � I � II DA1 • TO PROPOSED JOHN IRELAND BLVD. 11 DRAINAGE SYSTEM F_ PROPOSED STORM SEWER SYSTEM PROPOSED SEWER LINE 12 SIZE OF PIPE IN INCHES DIRECTION OF FLOW MANHOLE ............•• FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY i PROJECT BOUNDARY NOTE SEE EXHIBIT F, INTERSTATE DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO RELATE PROJECT DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITH FREEWAY DRAINAGE SYSTEM. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT-PAUL, MINNESOTA N l 0 200 400 600 CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 1, 1963 map no. 1.1 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES- URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS • r - 1 `L-1 STS PROPOSED I STORM SEWER SYSTEM IWI IWI Icc �� PROPOSED SEWER LINE '"'" " " " " " " " "'• 12�� SIZE OF PIPE IN INCHES Rdjj r mm*mm DIRECTION OF FLOW —�... liar , a 12' MANHOLE II I �0. ............•• FREEWAY RIGHT —OF —WAY I I I I PROJECT BOUNDARY I I cA J L__ — — ' — — — — NOTE' SEE EXHIBIT F, INTERSTATE �- - - - - - DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO RELATE PROJECT DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITH FREEWAY DRAINAGE I I 10SED W w SYSTEM. I I ROUTE 94 N INAGE SYSTEM I x I124 I �r I G L+ •. I '•• HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT I I •'•. • AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL I I 11 X24 . •'•• 55 EAST 5th STREET I I°a SAINT-PAUL, MINNESOTA 1 TO PROPOSED JOHN IRELAND BLVD. • ` DRAINAGE SYSTEM JCV �., 0 200 400 600 JJ II I i CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 i ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA D A j MAY 11 1963 [-mar) no.' JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES- URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS -j. I. _ lr — II I'I'I I�I I�I I.I -� R III III III III III _ 1 III Ill III III III III III III I I I �I I�I •1 I I I I I 11 61 I Ili, �rrrrr ,- rir.- r.r ................ ku IV III III III • 0 EXISTING WATER SYSTEM WATER MAIN 6 SIZE OF PIPE IN INCHES -� -, FIRE HYDRANT ■ VALVE FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PROJECT BOUNDARY I � I T 611 _ 411 LI I I • HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT I AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 6" 6„ 55 EAST 5th STREET p SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 'I I, I► , II II II i� / N l 0 200 400 600, CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY It 1963 map no. 12 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS ...J.1.11�L ... II ICI I�I I�I II I R III III III III III III � r 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 III III I 1 I �I I�I till1 I I I I 00 11 Ills t rf I I Lj..,.:, ..t,�.. ... ............. III III III J 11 I I � I 1611 ABANDONED 11 BY STATE - 4 OF MINN. PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM WATER MAIN 6" SIZE OF PIPE IN INCHES FIRE HYDRANT ■ VALVE FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPOSED WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WATER MAIN TO BE ABANDONED ■ PROPOSED VALVE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 611 � �s 11 STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA i �i.l1� r� r• � lr- � I 1 � 11 � II II N l 0 200 400 600 CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 1, 1963 mat) no.13 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS • • j.0 PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM WATER MAIN L iii 6" SIZE OF PIPE IN INCHES II■I 61u� ... .,............. J_ - FIRE HYDRANT JJ "I '� -- - - - - -� d VALVE • —�1 III IV FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY II�" III m PROJECT BOUNDARY III III III III PROPOSED WATER MAIN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WATER MAIN TO BE ABANDONED II I III If 11 ■ PROPOSED VALVE 11 II ABANDONED If II 6 "BY STATE - 4" i 11 OF MINN. III III HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT I I AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL I i 6„ • 16 u r 61, 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA I � I •• � •• / N •, t 0 200 400 600' CATHEDRAL AREA „ I URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT II MINNESOTA R -25 i400 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 1, 1963 map no. 13 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS Ir A4- _ l r _ II IWI IWI Ico m I I II I I I I I I I I C I 11 �I I� II — I I DAi. 1; I� I�I IEI I:I ■ I I: I: I; I. II II a EXISTING ELECTRICITY UNDERGROUND CABLE (owned by Northern States Power Co.) UNDERGROUND FEEDER CABLE (owned by Northern States Power Co.) UNDERGROUND CABLE (owned by City Of St. Paul ) 0 LIGHT POLE a FIXTURE (owned by City of St. Paul) 0 LIGHT POLE OWNED BY NORTHERN STATES CO. 81 FIXTURE OWNED BY CITY OF ST. PAUL ■ ELECTRIC MANHOLE - - -- FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PROJECT BOUNDARY _ E \ ••� IN II II I I 5 II f HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N O 200 400 600' CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY It 1963 map no. JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD • HARRISON 7 -2760 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS II re IWI IWI ICI 1: :1 •I Q1' II II II L r i I I II T11 i k 0 Q I:I I:I I:I _JET. - - - - -- — 7]1 W 0 I G...... ...... .......... — DA PROPOSED STREET LIGHTING HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N 0 200 400 600 CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA MAY 1, 1963 map no. JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS UNDERGROUND CABLE (owned by Northern States Power Co.) UNDERGROUND FEEDER CABLE ........... ... (owned by Northern States Power Co.) UNDERGROUND CABLE (owned by City Of St. Paul ) 0 LIGHT POLE a FIXTURE (owned by City of St. Paul) 0 LIGHT POLE OWNED BY NORTHERN STATES CO. 81 FIXTURE OWNED BY CITY OF ST. PAUL ■ ELECTRIC MANHOLE ----- FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY ® PROJECT BOUNDARY REMOVED • NEW 0 RELOCATED a CONVERTED NOTE: all existing street lights to be converted with new fixtures unless otherwise indicated. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N 0 200 400 600 CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA MAY 1, 1963 map no. JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS —Jill .....! I II IWII Iwi1211 II-I I Ra 7T-- - - - - -- • �• ■u•u 1 I 11 1I lal u II 2 114 I 11 I I I II LL I I I II J i` I II q 811 411 ' I II j 0 EXISTING GAS — — — — GAS MAIN 211 SIZE OF PIPE IN INCHES FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PROJECT BOUNBARY IG III - - -- ., I II I 1 1 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT I II I 1 ''••• 1 11 1 1 AUTHORITY OF'THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL I 11 11811 3" I ( �411 55 EAST 5th STREET 11 q SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA I lur •• I 11 Im •. M Al ' N •�,Z'i II l��' /�•\ 0 200 400 600 ', I 411 J` 11111 II � I � /�/ CATHEDRAL AREA III Iii; 11 URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 all 1,2 / � ST. PAUL , MINNESOTA MAY 11, 1963 map no. 16 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS III ITII S' I�I I�I I�I II■•I • Rit III � III I� II III I I • cry r - - - - -1 r r— I' I I� I I I II I IG MI I I ■ r II rl II I �I DA I EXISTING TELEPHONE - - - - -- UNDERGROUND CABLE FEEDER ROUTES ■• - -•••■ AERIAL CABLE DISTRIBUTION ROUTES -�- FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PROJECT BOUNDARY - .- .- . -. -.r. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N 0 200 400 600 CATHEDRAL AREA ,, URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL? MINNESOTA MAY 1, 1963 map no. 17 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS II ST Iwl ICI Ico II II R R I I ®® I a I u Em • 0 ....................... I............ AVENUE lal lal II II II I! J `AVENUN _ II II II J D A Y'J E A STRUCTURE CONDITION HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N 0 200 400 600 , CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 14F 1963 ma[) no. 18 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES ffl7b'l URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS SOUND DETERIORATING _ DETERIORATED NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PER O BLOCK WITH DEFICIENCIES .............. FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PROJECT BOUNDARY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N 0 200 400 600 , CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 14F 1963 ma[) no. 18 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES ffl7b'l URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS II �, ST. IWI I =I INI II II .... ..............................� AVENUE RON iW I I lal I I I I I I I I 1 1 C3 I I I I _J J `AVE -IU-t _ 7 11 �d e D AYVE 0 ii II BLIGHTING INFLUENCES _3 OR MORE BLIGHTING INFLUENCES LESS THAN 3 BLIGHTING INFLUENCES INADEQUATE STREET LAYOUT ® STRUCTURAL DEFICIENT BUILDINGS . — FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PROJECT BOUNDARY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 0 200 400 600 CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY It 1963 map no. 19 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2180 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS -S IwI rr II IWI IF-I Ic'I J �-�. ..,,�.. R N0. SQ FT USE 1 816,298 I I I I� I I I I I I I I I I Ci - - - -- I 3 II SAINT JOSEPH'S ACADEMY I I ~ I � MEDIUM DENSITY HOUSING 5 28,666 MEDIUM DENSITY HOUSING I LO N' Oa v' IN L PM-v L 1 II li I I tD II . I DISPOSITION PARCEL AREA N0. SQ FT USE 1 816,298 TECHNICAL - VOCATION HIGH SCHOOL 2 46,491 FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH 3 108,473 SAINT JOSEPH'S ACADEMY 4 342, 61 1 MEDIUM DENSITY HOUSING 5 28,666 MEDIUM DENSITY HOUSING 6 31 , 219 RIGHT-OF-WAY TOTAL 1,373,758 _ DEDICATED RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED BY ST. PAUL SCHOOL BOARD RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE ACQUIRED BY CITY OF ST. PAUL PARCEL BOUNDARY PROJECT BOUNDARY ............•• FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA < N 0 200 400 600' CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 11 1963 mat) no. 20 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS 0 U u u U u u u v U W U d o' Lff p 0� D ° p EZI 0 O ❑6 d � b� � �pogb�o 0 0 0 a as o 0 000000 .ad LIDO ❑017 (] p000❑❑ood000 o ppaQQ0000aopq❑p 0 0 p 0 000000 0500W f IIjd0o 0 mzoblj B AVENUE o° 0 o ■° 0 o oD� Ba o °�, r� , yo o ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN 1i. I JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND, CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD • HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS ° MAP NO. 21 c l 6 -ou einBij :a m 0 -M n rn z GD 0 F MOT mm 00 -qoo I O >W O-im In rn b CA T a-j=f M &7-j _7 . t, --k 713. arn Om z -4 $1 f • 0 < rn m o 0 C: Z Am z G) 0 rn 0 CO (l) Cl) rn U) 0 --I 0 z I I 41' 1L_ � II sl IWI IWI IF•I R( I 12 ' I I I I ■► I I f 124 \B AE Yj 111i I A ................. 1 —11 -i II it Q, III ISED ROUTE 94 NAGE SYSTEM •••1 If BOUNDARIES OF STORM WATER DRAINAGE AREAS ® PROPOSED SEWER LINE la" SIZE OF PIPE IN INCHES DIRECTION OF FLOW MANHOLE .............. FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY ® s PROJECT BOUNDARY NOTE SEE EXHIBIT F, INTERSTATE DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO RELATE PROJECT DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITH FREEWAY DRAINAGE SYSTEM I HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT I AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL I 55 EAST 5th STREET a SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA TO PROPOSED •� / %I HN IRELAND BLVD. RAINAGE SYSTEM l�,j;� p 200 400 600 i CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT II MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA � MAY 11 1963 figure no. 2 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS \ - z a J W a a z z z o O W u w CL O �J ° < w U zx as az O i-- a p ` a LL D <�W 0 Z a u � II �, W O Njo.z cr L U LJ z J ' o is si W m Yzwi ` a Q s n = I � • 7 � o u a a ZZ W 2 % �� N Q O( Z O 7k O=} � I cr a UQ J iNJ �a J = d i c U2co co z cr ai = a I a ( <�w,,:v�' \.- cs"- I�Y;S`'y •''' �i lit i.i, f; j! L v..�: �4rs �: tip( /ti � � •r: { h:t f . > /r�; ,"' �: it •!; � � �. i a .Y: f J LU 7nNiAT O a I J � ra -ica Z Y I Y� I I Ma F. <. •' �'•v k` 4ii V.l!lI li. 1 iL y •y t NI � N I I � g a u L-1 LU L ,g ill L-11 L 177Y1s 7ltB L-1 UL 11 L �I I 1 I I• 8 I' I figure no. 3 • w PROPOSED TRAFFIC SYSTEM •••.......•••• FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY �.� PROJECT BOUNDARY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N 0 200' 400 600 CATHEDRAL. AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 11 1963 figure no.4 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS FREEWAY ARTERIAL STREET COLLECTOR STREET ....................... RESIDENTIAL FEEDER STREET RESIDENTIAL LOCAL STREET •••.......•••• FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY �.� PROJECT BOUNDARY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N 0 200' 400 600 CATHEDRAL. AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R -25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 11 1963 figure no.4 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES URBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS W Q W 2 t HAMLINE COMMUNITY MACALESTER COMMUNITY 0 0 SUMMIT —DALE COMMUNITY THOMAS —DALE COMMUNITY PROJECT I U. S. IIVTERSTATE 9 - ... MARSHALL AVE. SUMMIT —DALE COMMUNITY l� G.N.R.P. BOUNDARY SUMM /T AVE. 1 WEST—SEVENTH ST. CLA /R I STREET COMMUNITY •i. ?, tii. Y. Q W 2 MT. AIRY OMMUNIT 0 lok figure no. 5 3 4 Vi y Q � M Q h c� Q 2 O W 1W. k v y V i 0 3 THOMAS —DALE COMMUNITY PROJECT I U. S. IIVTERSTATE 9 - ... MARSHALL AVE. SUMMIT —DALE COMMUNITY l� G.N.R.P. BOUNDARY SUMM /T AVE. 1 WEST—SEVENTH ST. CLA /R I STREET COMMUNITY •i. ?, tii. Y. Q W 2 MT. AIRY OMMUNIT 0 lok figure no. 5 I TIP-1-1 W11111A III � 1 + to , T. V, 1,4 {�• � k }� � s ,t3 � , .II. ..r,n•.rl� _ t��••� � k _R 1 cD ''_^^ z V/ D Z O Q U O W W O U z W J 0 cl L J U a } U- 0 w I figure no. 7 •J' t cD ''_^^ z V/ D Z O Q U O W W O U z W J 0 cl L J U a } U- 0 w I figure no. 7 — , � —ST. _ II IWI 11--I IcoI ROND DAY R ................................... u I!� Iai II II II 11 I I �I r 11 �1 I I SEQUENCE OF RELOCATION STAGE OF RELOCATION - TENTATIVE BOUNDARY OF RELOCATION STAGE ............• FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY s� = PROJECT BOUNDARY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 55 EAST 5th STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA N 0 zoo' 40d 600' CATHEDRAL AREA URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT MINNESOTA R-25 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 11 1963 figure no. 8 JACK MELTZER ASSOCIATES TURBAN RENEWAL AND CITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS 53 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD . HARRISON 7 -2150 CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS �Oa F -1 -"V4-4, I ....... ... .j or i I i�ljll 11 � M ..W4 - • i Ir -41,u .4 TIT, rin .v rill