07-1119CITY
Presented by
Council File #-��
Green 56eet #
RESOLUTlON t�y
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
I WHEREAS, Department of Safety and Inspections has requested the City Council to
2 hold public hearings to consider the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair or wrecking
3 and removal of a two-story, wood frame single family dwelling and detached, one and one-half
4 car garage located on property hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property" and commonly
5 known as 118 ROSE AVENUE EAST. This property is legally described as follows, to wit:
RANSOM'S ADDITION TO ST. PAUL LOTS 27 AND LOT 28 BLK 2
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
WHEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Office and
information obtained by Department of Safety and Inspections on or before March 31, 2007, the
following are the now known interested or responsible parties for the Subject Property: Joan C
[h
Gobely, I 18 Rose Avenue E, St Paul, MN 55117; Fred Hoelzel, 10320 38 Avenue N, Plymouth
MN 55441; Fred Hoelzel - Property Manager, 9220 Bass Lake Road, New Hope, MN 55428;
Twin City Federal Savings and Loan, P.O. Box 130670, Roseville, MN 55113, District 6
Planning Council, district6Cc�qwestoffice.net
WHEREAS, Department of Safety and Inspections has served in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code an order identified as an "Order to
Abate Nuisance Building(s)" dated July 16, 2007; and
WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the
structure located on the Subject Property is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and
WHEREAS, this order inforcned the interested ar responsible parties that they must xepaic
or demolish the structure located on the Subject Property by August 15, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property
declaring this building(s) to constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and
WHEREAS, this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Department of Safety
and Inspections requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the Legislative
Heazing Officer of the City Council and the Saint Paul City Council; and
WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance
with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, oPthe time, date, place and
purpose of the public hearings; and
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul
City Council on Tuesday, October 23, 2007 to hear testimony and evidence, and after receiving
testimony and evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested
or responsible parties to make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace,
health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting influence on the community by demolishing
and removing the structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The
67-11/9
44
45
46
47
48
49
�0
51
>2
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
demolition of the structure to be completed within fifteen (15) days after the date of the Council
Hearing; and
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul City Council on Wednesday,
November 21, 2007 and the testimony and evidence including the action taken by the
Legislative Hearing Officer was considered by the Council; now therefore
BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the testimony and evidence presented at the above
referenced public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and
Order conceming the Subject Property at 118 ROSE AVENUE EAST.
That the Subject Property comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul
Legislative Code, Chapter 45.
2. That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estimated to exceed
five thousand dollazs ($5,000.00).
That there now exists and has exisYed multiple Housing or Building code
violations at the Subject Property.
4. That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known
responsible parties to correct the deficiencies ar to demolish and remove the
building(s).
�
�
�
That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been corrected.
That Department of Safety and Inspections has posted a placard on the Subject
Property which declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition.
That this building has been routinely monitored by Department of Safety and
Inspections, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings.
That the known interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this
resolution and that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled.
••� '
The Saint Paul City Council hereby makes the following order:
The above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Property
safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its
blighting influence on the community by demolishing and removing the structure in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The demolition and removal of the
structure must be completed within �fteen (15) days after the date of the Council
Hearing.
D�-111 R
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
]03
4.
If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of time Department of
Safety and Inspections is hereby authorized to take whatever steps aze necessary to
demolish and remove this structure, fill the site and chazge the costs incurred against the
Subject Property pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative
Code.
In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Saint Paul, all
personal property or fixtures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal
shall be removed from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this time
period. If all personal property is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned
and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and dispose of such property as provided by law.
It is further ordered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested
par[ies in accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
Requested by Department of:
Safety and Inspections
Code Enforcement / Vacant
�
Form Approved by City Attorney
By:
Form Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
By:
Adoption Certified by Coun il Secretary
g /, i
Approved b o ate �1 Z
By:
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
��- i ll9
Departmentloffice/council: � Date Initiated: i
S� -DeptofSafety&Inspectious ; Z�EP-0� _; Green Sheet NO: 3044559
Contact Person & Phone:
Bab Kessler
266-9013
Must Be on
21-NOV-07
Doc. Type: PUBLIC HEARING (RESOLUI
E-DOCUment Required: Y
Document Contact: Ma�cine Linston
Contact Phone: 26Et938
�
Assign
Number
Por
Routing
Order
Total # of Signature Pages _(Clip All Locations for Signature)
O pept Of 591�¢N & InSpectlOnS I I
1 peot of Saferi & Inspections ' Department D'uector
2 C�7p Attomev i
3 Yor's Office Mavor/Assistant
4 omN I
5 'ty G7erk City Clerk
City Council to pass tivs resolurion which will order the owner(s) to remove the referenced building(s). If the owner fails to comply
with the resolution, Neighborhood Housing & Property Improvement is ordered to remove the building. The subject property is
located at 118 Rose Avenue East.
idations: Approve (A) or K
Planning Commission
CIB Committee
Civil Service Commission
1. Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department?
Ves No
2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
Explain all.yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Y11here, Why):
This building(s) is a nuisance building(s) as defined in Ck�apter 45 and a vacant building as defined in Chapter 43 of the Saint Paul
Legislative Code. he owners, interested parties and responsible par[ies known to the Eaforcement Officer were given an order to
repair or remove the building at 118 Rose Avenue East by August 15, 2007, and k�ave failed to comply with those orders.
Advantages If Approved:
The Ciry will eliminate a nuisance.
Disativantages If Approved:
The City will spend funds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the property, collected as a special
assessment against the property taxes. ,
Disadvantages If Not Approved:
A nuisance condirion will remain unabated in the City. This building(s) will continue to blight the communiry.
Trensaction: $12,000.00 Cost/RevenueBudgeted:y
Fundiny source: Nuisance Housing Abatement A���ity Number: 30251
FinanCial Information:
(Explain)
�{1�"�� r� � �
,�?e��n..�'•b .s?r
� -�! , � {. :.
October 29, 2007 235 PM Page 1 .._...
47- ///9
SUMMARY FOR PUBLIC HEARING
118 Rose Avenue East
Legislative Hearing — Tuesday, October 23, 2007
City Council — Wednesday, November 21, 2007
The building is a two-story, wood frame, single family dwelling with a detached 1%2 car garage on a
lot of 5663 square feet.
According to our files, it has been a vacant building since Apri128, 2005.
The current property owner is Joan C Gobely, per AMANDA and Ramsey County property records.
The City of St. Paul has boarded this building to secure it from trespass.
There haue been ten (10) SUMMARY ABATEMENT NOTICES since 2005.
There have been seven (7) WORK ORDERS issued for:
- Removal of improperly stored refuse
- Removal of tall grass and weeds
Removal of snow and ice
On June 28, 2007, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constihxte a
nuisance condition was developed and photographs were taken. An ORDER TO ABATE A
NiJISANCE BUILDING was posted on July 16, 2007 with a compliance date of August 15, 2007. As
of this date this property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the
legislative code.
The Vacant Building registration fees are delinquent in the amount of $500.00.
Ta�cation has placed an estimated market value of $104,200 on the land and $71,000 on the building.
As of October 22, 2007 a Code Compliance inspection has not been completed.
As of October 22, 2007, the $5,000.00 performance bond has not been posted.
Real Estate tases for the year 2006 are delinquent in the amount of $2273.23 plus penalty and interest.
Code Enforcement Officers estimate the cost to repair this structure is $50,000 to $60,000. The
estimated cost to Demolish is $10,000 to $12,000.
NIIPI, Division of Code Enforcement Resolution submitted for consideration orders the property
owner to repair or remove this shucture within fifteen (15) days, if not the resolution authorizes the
Division of Code Enforcement to demolish and assess the costs to the property.
Tas & Properiy Characteristic Tnformation - Structure Description
Hame 5"sYe Map
Page 1 of 2
6�-1119
Cantazt Us
Tax & Property Characteristic Information -
Structure Description
RRInfo Home � � Tiqs Info � � Propertv Search � � Record Document � � Contact Us
New Pr�ert�Search
Back to Search Results
Quick Info
Property_ Information
Taxpayer Name and
Address
Value Informatio�
ualue Nistorv
Structure Description
Saie information
Sqeciai Assessments
Frooertv Tax Payment
Information
Propert�Tax Payment
N �st�
> Structure Description
Property Identification 30.29.22.12.0018
Number (PIN)
Property Address 118 Rose Ave E
St. Paul 55117-5026
Residential Property:
Year Built 1884
# of Stories 1.50
Style One And 3/4 Story
Exterior Wall Aluminum(vinyl
Total Rooms 6
Total Family Rooms 0
Total Bedrooms 3
Full Baths 1
Half Baths 0
Attic Type
Pinished SQ Feet 1378
Foundation Size 892
Basement Area Finished
Finished Rec Area
Current Pro�erly Tax
Statement/Value Notice
2006 Property Tax
StatementlValue Notice
20Q5 Prope� ty Tax
S:atementJVatue Notice
2004 Property Tax
Statement/Value Notice
Garage Type Detached
Area (sq.ft.) 312
Parcel Size .13 Acres
Parcel Width 80.00 Feet
Parcel Depth 138.00 Feet
Land Use Code 510
Land Use Description R- Single Family Dweliing,
Platted Lot
http://rrinfo.co.ramsey.mn.us/public/characteristic/Parcel.pasp?scrn=Dwelling&pin=3 029... 10/22/2007
DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY AND IIvSPECTIONS
Dick Lzppert Manager of Cade Enforcement
SASNT
PAUL
�
AAAA
CITY OF SA�T PAUL
N✓isarece Bu¢Iding Enforceme:t
Christopher B. Coleman, Mayor
1600 U✓Lite Bem Ave N
Saint Paul, MN »106
September 28, 2007
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
Council President and
Members of the City Council
p7- / 1! 9
Tei (65!) 266-l900
Faz: (651) 266-1926
Department of Safety and Inspections, VacantNuisance Buildings Enforcement Division
has requested the City Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution oxdering
the repair or removal of the nuisance building(s) located at:
118 ROSE AVE E
The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows:
Legislative Hearing — Tuesday, October 23, 2007
City Council Hearing — Wednesday, November 21, 2007
The owners and responsible parties of record are:
Name and Last Known Address
Joan C Gobely
118 Rose Ave E
St Paul MN 55117-5026
Property Manager
9220 Bass Lake Rd
New Hope MN 55428
Fred Hoelzel
10320 38th Ave N
Plymouth M1V 55441-1501
Twin City Federal Savings and Loan
P.O. Box 130670
Roseville, MN 55113
District 6 Planning Council
district6(a�qwestoffice.net
Interest
Fee Owner
Certificate of Occupancy
Responsible Party
Tax Owner
Mortgagee
District Council
AA-ADA-EEO Employer
118 Rose Avenue East
September 28, 2007
Page 2
The legal description of this property is:
6"7- 1119
RANSOM'S ADDITION TO ST. PAti�L LOTS 27 A,\D LOT 28 BLK 2
The Department of Safety and Inspections has declazed this building(s) to constitute a
"nuisance" as defined by Legislative Code, Chapter 45. The Department of Safety and
Inspections has issued an arder to the then known responsible parties to eliminate this
nuisance condition by correcting the deficiencies or by razing and removing this
building(s).
The property was re-inspected on August 16, 2007. There was no compliance and the
nuisance condition remains unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighting
influence of this property. It is the recommeildation of the Department of Safety and
Inspections that the City Council pass a resolution ordering the responsible parties to
either repair, or demolish and remove this building in a timely manner, and failing that,
authorize the Department of Safety and Inspections to proceed to demolition and removal,
and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be
collected in the same manner as tases.
Sincerely,
S`teve Magner
Steve Magner
Vacant Buildings Manager
Department of Safety and Inspections
SM:mI
cc: Judy Hanson, City Attorneys Office
Mary Erickson, Assistant Secretary to the Council
Cindy Carlson, PED-Housing Division
Stacey Millett, Invest St. Paul
District Council— Community Organizer
pubhmg60183 06/07
DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY Al�TD INSPECTIONS
Dick Lipperz M¢nager of Code Enforcement
CITY OF SAIl�T PAUL
ChristopherB. Coleman, Mayor
Tlutsance Bu.ilding Enforcement
o7-I 119
Te?. (6 i l) ?66-1900
Fac. (651j?66-1926
I600 White Bear Ave N
Saint Paul, MA� i i 106
7uly 16, 2007
Joan C Gobely
118 Rose Ave E
St Paul MN 55117-5026
Fred Hoelzel
10320 38"' Avenue.N
Plymouth, MN 55441
Fred Hoelzel — Property Manger Twin City Federal Savings & Loan
9220 Bass Lake Road PO Box 130670
New Hope, MN 55428 Roseville, MN 55113
Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s)
Dear: Joan C Gobely
The Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Unit, Department of the Department of Safety and
Inspections, Division of Code Enforcement, hereby declares the premises located at:
118 ROSE AVE E
and legally described as follows, to wit:
RANSOM'S ADDITION TO ST. PAUL LOTS 27 AND LOT 28 BLK 2
to comprise a nuisance condition in violation of the Saint Paul Legislative Code,
Chapter 45.02, and subject to demolition nnder authority of Chapter 4511.
On June 28, 2007, a Building Deficiency Inspection Report was compiled and the
following condirions were observed.
This list of deficiencies is not necessarily all the deficiencies present at this time. As
�rst remedial action, a Code Compliance Inspection must be obtained from the
Building Inspection and Design Section, 8 Fourth Street East, Suite 200, Commerce
Building (651)266-9090. That inspection will identify specific defects, necessary
repairs and legal requirements to correct this nuisance condition. You may also be
required to post a five thousand dollar ($5,000.00) performance bond with the
Building Inspection and Design Office before any permits are issued, except for a
demolition permit.
AA-ADA-EEO Employer
7uly 16, 2007
118 ROSE AVH E
page2 ��'�'1 g
This building(s) is subject to the resh of Saint Paul Ordinance Chapter 33.03 and
shall not atrain be used for occupancy until such time as a Certificate of Compliance or a
Certificate of Occupancy has been issued.
'This is a two-story, wood frame, sin�le family dwelling with a detached, one %z stail car
garage.
Exterior
The roof is deteriorated, defective, or in a state of disrepair. Repair or
replace the roof covering to a sound, tight and water impervious
condition. Permit may be required.
2. The windows and/or storm windows are in a state of disrepair. Replace
all missing or broken window glass. Make all necessary repairs to
frames, sashes, hardware and associated trim in a professional manner.
Permit may be required.
3. The window and/or door screens are missing, defective or in a state of
disrepair. Provide proper window and door screens for all openable
windows and doors. Screens must be tight-fitting and securely fastened
to the frames.
4. The exterior walls of the house and(or garage are defective. Repair all
holes, breaks, loose or rotting siding, to a professional state of
maintenance.
The foundation is deteriorated, defective or in a state of disrepair.
Repair all foundation defects in a professional manner to a
weather-tight, water-tight and rodent-proof condition. Permit may be
required.
6. The chimney is defective, deteriorated or in a state of disrepair. Replace
ali missing or defective bricks, tuckpoint as needed to restore the
chimney to a professional state of maintenance and repair. Permit may
be required.
7. The eaves and soffits are in a state of disrepair or deterioration. Repair
all defects, holes, breaks, loose or rotting boards, to a professional state
of maintenance. Permit may be required.
8. The exterior walls of the house and/or garage are defective. Repair all
holes, breaks, loose or rotting siding, to a professional state of
maintenance.
9. The exterior walls of the garage are defective. Repaix all holes, breaks,
loose or rotting siding, to a professional state of maintenance.
July 16, 2007
118 ROSE AVE b
pa�e 3
D�-lll9
Note: The interior was not accessible for inspection but observin� through a window the
following was noted:
10. The intenor walls are defective. Repair all wall defects and finish in a
professional manner.
11. The interior ceilings are defective. Repair all ceiling defects and finish
in a professional manner.
12. SANITATION: Immediately remove improperly stored or accumulated
refuse including; garbage, rubbish, junk, vehicle parts, wood, metal,
recycling materials, etc., from intenor.
As owner, agent or responsible party, you are hereby notified that if these deficiencies and
the resulting nuisance condition is not corrected by August 15, 2007 the Department of
Safety and Inspections, Division of Code Enforcement, will begin a substantial abatement
process to demolish and remove the building(s). The costs of this action, including
administrative costs and demolition costs will be assessed againsY the property taxes as a
special assessment in accordance with law.
As first remediai action, a Code Compliance Inspection Report must be obtained from the
Building Inspection and Design Section, 8 Fourth Street, Suite #Z00, Commerce Building,
(651)266-9090. This inspection will identify specific defects, necessary repairs and legal
requirements to correct this nuisance condition.
As an owner or responsible party, you are required by law to provide full and complete
disclosure of this "Order to Abate" to all interested parties, all present or subsequent
renters and any subsequent owners. If you sell, transfer, or convey in any manner, the
ownership or responsibility for this property, you must within seven (7) days, notify the
Enforcement Officer with the names and addresses of any new owners or responsible
parties.
The Enfarcement Officer is required by law to post a placard on this property which
declares it to be a"nuisance condition", subject to demolition and removal by the City.
This placard shall not be removed without the written authority of the Deparnnent of
Safety and Inspections, Division of Code Enforcement. The department is further
required to file a copy of this "Order to Abate" with the City Clerk's Office.
If corrective action is not taken within the time specified in this order, the Enfarcement
Officer will notify the City Council that abatement action is necessary. The City Clerk
will then schedule dates for Public Hearings before the City Council at which time
testimony will be heard from interested parties. After this hearing the City Council will
adopt a resolution stating what action if any, it deems appropriate.
July 16, 2007
118 ROSE AVE E
paee 4
07- I119
If the resolution calls for abatement action the Council may either order the City to take
the abatement action or fix a time within which this nuisance must be abated in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 33 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code and
provide that if corrective action is not taken within the specified time, the City shall abate
this nuisance. The costs of this action, including administrative costs will be assessed
against the property as a special assessment in accordance with law.
If you have any questions or request additional information please contact Joe
Yannarelly between the hours of 8:00 and 930 a.m. at 651-266-1920, or you may leave
a voice mail message.
Sincerely,
Steve Magner
Vacant Buildings Prob am Manager
Division of Code Enforcement
cc: Mary Erickson - Council Research
Cindy Carlson - PED Housing
Axny Spong — Heritage Preservation
ota60135 6/07
w
�
�
w
�
° a
�
�
�
�
0
0
N
M
N
L.
�
�
0
U
0
�
'L3
m
d
O
E"�
b�A
.�
�
x
N
.�
.�
�
.a
M
�
�
�
x
�
�
0
U
y
U
a
.,
o � r r �,/
�� � o 0 0 � 07
d � � � �
� �
F� � I
� o 0 o i
` I
L I
I
� � I �
� r
a = i
� I��N �
:, ; � �
ra
�"a �
,� � :.�
o'�� �
� oa
i
� r r � � r r r c� r r
U z� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
aO� oo�yin co,�in o,�in co,� �n oo,y�in
� F� � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a .-r � � .--i .. .-i .--i .--i �. .-�
a
U
z
�.
o W
`i'�,
���
ZUF" ° o
o 5 W N ,
�
'� w � °� a
�� ° °
��>
,�
��z
H�H �
0
W � W �
U�� �
O
� � F
r r
,,,., ° o 0
� � z � � i
� � N N
� O O
A �
�
T
W T
� �'" � N i. '� .-+ c�d m i�� c
U �
�F" '� Q- o ��� . �v �n � ❑ m
W W °' �-' ° .�-�' "' � � v � i �y o "' j ci ,�
h� ��, �, � �� � �� �o
zw �' a�v, � �, >Z -a �Z � �
�" `" p > z a� � � a� � °J � a� 3
� � M ^ �
V] � � � � � � dj � �t n � � � N
W d � N� 3 o ai � o� o y 3 �� o.� � �
3� U� �O �" �ox '�„' '�", o 00 �aFq'� ai „co
•��- Co Py � '� � (v � O '� c � � '3 , b � O O N N
� .°�vz� w"�o`",z�, w' °a� t- �a�� ' q�
�
0
�
�
Date: June 28, 2007 G�
�le #: OS - 095836 ��� II /
Folder Name: 118 ROSE AVE E
PIN: 302922120018
e:a,� s �h�,�;+n_ � ' }
t'S� t �tj
: �'
ti '�
- ..�'4 � .�4�. .
�'- �
� �
�� �� `. . .,.
�
�
zA
'. d ..�_.�,C
L .
� ��^ ..
. .."�,...ry �
�
�
��?
��� �.
#
�
}� �
K`f »
� dd� l.=
� � �" �,��fi � � � ���.
`.3%
..—: ,� m
C
� i�'+ ` '
?.� a? � . .'� �...
� . .� �,.. �� •
�F � �
�� ' t
� �.
m z�'�; q.�.., .
^ �' ; 2
C S y��� �_,�a]J
N � ��
° " 'J
-.' -
. �r�
�
'�*".'
��
��
� %.�
�
:.„g�F �, ...,� mmes..�,,:,:,�... »,.-�,5ffi=u:«:sastr..9�s.�.'="_ .;. � "� ' `xi i
'i+� , ,. . .;::F.�f , � � r ..�: ,t2�
.��,,.,.�.�a « �B..x,+�cp _ ,.; � �� � ,
� 1�'g �r �;�. ,., '
�w-" k '� f � ��n.., � � �
a�
-� ,py ��; � ��—�_.
v �
_ r �. '.'. .'e. ; ._. i
�.. g �
'&y` � ...�..w..� +P .
. " � ' � � ... .
„'°" +
� . J :et..,.,fa..
a
�
. ; . .. ;, r
�
.: �t' � �� �! �. .
Date: June 28, 2007
File #: OS - 095836
Folder Name: 118 ROSE AVE E
PIN: 302922120018
b�—lIl9
Date: June 28, 2007
File #: OS - 095836 b � f �� 9
Folder Name: 118 ROSE AVE E
PIN: 302922120018
Date: June 28, 2007
File #: OS - 095836 D�� f�� �j
Folder Name: 118 ROSE AVE E
PIN: 302922120018
Date: June 28, 2007
File #: OS - 095836 ��� j/� 9
Folder Name: 118 ROSE AVE E �
PIN: 302922120018
Date: June 28, 2007
File #: OS - 095836 ��� I f l G�
Folder Name: 118 ROSE AVE E �
PIN: 302922120018
Date: June 28, 2007
File #: OS - 095836 6�� �f �L�
Folder Name: 118 ROSE AVE E
PIN: 302922120018
� �._ � .
9
F
*.: � : � '
�
'F:��� 'ti
' �` � ..h
�x=� "`.L.�;a
��
r +t� +
,dy" � .
�'�'s i.�'-..,r� _i..
�:_ ..� a., � +.
+ '7
. ° r ; .�ces d� � � p
n
"� � '
� ��.�� x
. �� q. �.P` T. �:
. °t�.r . .. �m.� ' ~` �'
. . . . �'.�- . .:
. ` r. . -.��. ���
. X.
, w ��
i�'. " ..
� _
' .': �
`;�
� �c� . . ,v�. *. c- :,;r .� .. � ........ . sns.rct . .
Date: June 28, 2007
File #: OS - 095836
Folder Name: 118 ROSE AVE E i,�7� � I� 9
PIN: 302922120018 « �
Date: June 28, 2007
File #: OS - 095836
Folder Name: 118 ROSE AVE E �"�„ �/l Gj'
PIN: 302922120018
Date: June 28, 2007
File #: OS - 095836 �
Folder Name: 118 ROSE AVE E �/� ��f �
PIN: 302922120018
To: The City of St. Paul
From: Tri Area Biock Club
RE: I 18 East Rose Avenue Demolition
Date: October 4, 20d7
D�I-1 ll �I
118 East Rose Avenue is located direcfly adjacent to the eastem boundary of ow desigoated
block club area. The siructure at that address has been in a neglected and deteriorating state for
some years and has been vacant for several of those years. Unfortunately once again, this is
another structure among the aging housing stock of ow neighborhood that has ouflived its
usefulness and should be demolished.
The proximity of this blighted structure to the I3ew Harmony Care Center, the proposed Trillium
nature preserve and trails, and a major arterial intersection/gateway to the North End and the City
is also reason for its removal. New Harmony Care Center, au important and much needed part of
our neighborhood, has recenfly upgraded its facility and has been supportive of the City's plans
for the Trillium site to the east. Their willingness to invest in our community along with the
City's investment in the park project are welcome and much needed enhancements to the North
End. With the I35E/Maryland Avenue/Jackson Street area being a main gateway to the
community, visual aesthetics also contribute to the perception of our neighborhood and City. The
issue of safety also is a factor. A property such as this, adjacent to the parking lot for staff,
families, and friends of caze center residents, could easily attract and harbor a criminal element
and/or iransient population, especially in light of the nearby rail lines and bridges. Removing the
boazded structure at 118 East Rose Avenue would be a step in the right direcrion.
Your considerarion of our comment is appreciated.
October 23, 2007 Legislative Hearing Minutes v�� 1�� � Page 7
6. Ordering the owner to remove or repair the building(s) at 118 Rose Avenue East within fifteen
(15) days from adoprion of resolution.
Mr. Magner stated the building was a two-story, wood frame, single-family dwelling with a detached
one and one-half stall gazage on a lot of 5,663 squaze feet and had been vacant since Apri128, 2005. A
code compiiance inspection had not been done, the vacant building registration fees were delinquent in
the amount of $500, and the $5,000 performance bond had not been posted. On June 28, 2007, an
inspection of the building was done and a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was
developed. An order to abate a nuisance building was posted on July 16, 2007 with a compliance date
of August 15, 2007. To date, the property remained in a condition which comprised a nuisance as
defined by the Legislative Code. Ramsey County Tasation estimated the market value of the land to
be approxunately $104,200 and the building to be $71,000. Real estate taxes for 2006 were delinquent
in the amount of $2,273.23, plus penalty and interest. Code Enforcement estimates the cost to repair
the building to be approximately $50,000 to $60,000. The cost for demolition was estimated to be
approximately $10,000 to $12,000. There had also been 10 sumuiary abatements issued to this
property, seven of which went to work order: to secure the building and the City had to board the
building to secure it from trespass, remove improperly stored refuse, cut tall grass and weeds, and
remove snow and ice. Code Enfarcement recommends the building be repaired or removed within 15
days. Mr. Magner read into the record a letter received from the Tri Area Block kClub, on the desire
to have the building demolished. Mr. Magner presented photographs of the property.
The property owner of recard, Joan C. Gobely, did not appear. Fred Hoelzel appeared and stated that
he was a realtor and property manager and he had managed this property since approximately 1991.
He stated that he, his wife Nancy and her sister Kathleen had made an application to clear the title as
they did not have clear title to the property. He explained that there was an unrecorded contract for
deed on the property which they had assumed in 1989 and had paid it off over the past several yeazs.
The previous owner, Joan Gobely, had died and they paid off the underlying mortgage. Hannony
Nursing Home, Inc., which went out of business, had been the previous owner of the property. They
had made an application to torrens the property which was in the process and he was unsure when it
would go before the court. Once they had clear title, they would like to contract to have the building
demolished as he did not believe the building was worth restoring. They also owned five other parcels
in addition to this property and this property which was located on the western portion to the other
parcels. He stated that they were requesting additional time.
Ms. Moermond stated that in order to grant the request for additional time, she had a list of condirions
that were required to be met. The building had been vacant for approximately two and one-half years,
the City had to inform them to maintain the property, and for the most part, the City had been
maintaining the property. The vacant building registration fees had not been paid and the tases were
due and owing in an amount over $2,000. What she heard was that there was no interest in
rehabilitating the building.
Mr. Hoelzel stated that was conect; however, he had concern with the City's bidding process on
projects. He cited the City bidding out tree removal where they had received only one bid and the tree
company charged exorbitant fees far tree removal.
Mr. Magner stated that Code Enforcement did not use the same process as Forestry. They sent out
RFPs based on a standard contract which was a very competitive bidding process. For the most part,
the bids that they received were fairly low; in the $5,000 to $10,000 range and most of the bids were
coming in under $10,000. He stated that he could provide Mr. Hoelzel with the bid tab and if he so
October 23, 2007 Le� slative Hearing Minutes
������� Pages
desired, he couid contact any af the contractors to see if they would demo the buildings for the same
price. He believed that they likely would not since they were guaranteed payment from the City and
were not necessarily guazanteed payment from a private individuai. He offered to fa�c the bids to Mr.
Hoelzel since he did not have them available for the hearing. Mr. Ma�er also stated that since the
2006 tases were in arrears and if the properiy were in a targetad area, the County could go after the
property in a shortened amount of redemption time and it would become tax forfeited.
Ms. Moermond told Mr. Hoelzel that he was weicome Co obtain his own bids to demalish the buiiding.
Since this had been a nuisance property for quite some time, she recommended the building be
removed within 15 days with no option for repair.