Loading...
06-814Council File # ��o — �j/� Green Sheet # 3031� 1 2 3 4 $ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1� 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 5� 51 52 53 54 55 56 RESOLUTION CITY OF SAfNT PAUL, MINNESOTA as WHEREAS, these projec[s were originally adopted by Council on CF OS-1163, known respectively as Log # SU-0701483, SU#0701474 and SU#0801382,and WHEREAS, the bids came in at varying amounts from the original engineer's estimate, necessitating changes in the MSA funding for these projects, the addirion of assessment financing and a need for additional CIB funding for [he Como Railroad Crossing project, and WAEREAS, the Mary]andlArcade Channelization, the South Wabasha Retaining Wall and the Lafayette Channelization projects were recently comple[ed and have surplus MSA balances that can be used for the above referenced contract, with [he remainder transfemng to MSA Contingency, and WHEREAS, the Whi[e Bear Avenue utiliry line buria] project has surplus CIB funding that can be hansferred to cover the addirional costs on the Como Railroad Crossing project, so THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the Ciry of Saint Paul, upon recommendation of the Mayor and advice of the Long Range Capital Improvement Budget Committee, tha[ $205,562.96 is available for appropria[ion in the 2003 & 2006 Capital Improvement Budgets, as heretofore adopted and amended by this Council, be hereby further amended in the Improvement Budget, in the following particulars: Clirsent Budget FINANCING PLAN Victoria: University to Thomas C06-2G025 M5A Assessments SPENDING PLAN Victoria: Universlty to Thomas C06-2G025 Conshvction FINANCING PLAN Como Railroad Crossing CO3-2T557-29275 Assessments CIB SPENDING PLAN Como Railroad Crossing CO3-2T557-29275 Construction FINANCING PLAN Minnehaha: Dale to Arundel C06-2G020 MSA Assessments 398,000.00 0.00 398,000.00 398.000.00 398,000.00 18,000.00 222 000.00 240,000.00 2A0,000.00 2ao,000.00 600,000.00 190.000.00 790,000.00 Amended Change Budget 86,391.02 484,391.02 25 296.46 25 296.46 111,687.48 509,687.48 111,687.48 509,687.0.8 1ll,687.48 509,687.48 2,61030 107.554.04 110,164.34 110.16434 110,16434 450,411.74 -64.304.86 386,106.88 2Q61030 329 554.04 350,16434 350,16434 35q16434 1,OSQ411.74 125.695.14 1,176,106.88 WHEREAS, the Deparhnent of Pub]ic Works has awazded a contract for the VictoriaUniversity to Thomas, the Minnehaha:Dale to Arundel the Se1by:Lexington to Avon, and the Como Railroad Crossing projects, and � Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet � � � ��� Depar6neM/office/council; Date Initiated: Pw -��w� ,�.�� Green Sheet NO: 3031381 Contaet Pewon 8 Phone: Paul KuRz 26662ai 6 Clerk (S C1e , � ToTal#ofSignalurePages_(ClipAliLOCationsforSignalure) Approve attached Council Resoludon amending the sperrding and financing plans of the Victoria, Minnehaha, Selby & Como Railroad crossing projects. � idations: /{oprrne (A) or Reject Planning Canmission CIB Canmittee CiHI Service Commission Initiating Problem, Issues, Opporlunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): Changes in the MSA funding, the addidon of assessment financing and additional CIB funding am needed. The Maryland/Arcade Channelizaaon, the South Wabasha Retaining Wall and the Lafayette Channelization projects were recendy completed and have surplus MSA balances available to be used on the above referenced projects with the remainder aansferred to Contingency. Surplus CIB funds from W6ite Bear will be transferred to Como Railroad project. Advantages IfApproved: Three older projects that have been recenfly completed will be closed out and tLe surplus MSA will be used to fund these projeas. Disadvantayes If Approv¢d: The MSA used finm the thnee projects that were recently closed will not be available fior use on other capitat ro'�� ��� � Assign Number Fw Routing Order /�qenda by Personal Service Contracts MustMSwer tlie Following questions: 1. Has this personlfimi e�er wo�ked under a coMract for this departmeM? Yes No 2. Has this person/fifin e�er been a city employee? Yes No 3. Does this personl8fm possess a skill not namally possessed by any curtent city employee? Yes No ExpWin all yes answers on separate sheet and aifach !o green sheet DisadvantageslFNotApproved: sav�+ � v �-�w� There will not be sufficient fiutding in the budget to pay the contraetor for work done on this contract. � g �� + y � g � 7 �.+6 9 � ����.J �4 Total Amount of Transaetion: Fundin5l Source: MSA, Asmts & CB CosHRevenue Budgeted: Y Financial Information: (Explain) ActivilyNumher. CpFy,2G020, 2G025, 2H011, CO3-2T557, etC. Cots�cil Research July 17, 2006 12:08 PM Page 1