06-797City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND
COUNC •L FILE O. ��n 7� �
By �
�
FIXING TIME OE HE,ARING THEREON File No.
o�
Assessment No. 5064_
Voting Ward 6 & 7
Green Sheet No. �.�D�oZ..�
In the Matter of constructing an above standard twin lantern street lighting
system on White Bear Avenue from approximately 140 feet south of Beech Street
to approximately 140 feet north of Reaney Avenue.
Preliminary Order: 06-56 a pproved
Final Order: 06-169 approved
01/11/06
02/15/06
The assessments of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection
with the above improvement having been submitted to the Council having
considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all
respects approved.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That a pub].ic hearing be had on said assessment on
the 18th day of October, 2006 at the hour of Five th�rty o'clock P.M. in
the Council Chambers of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City
of St. Paul; that the Valuation and Assessment Engineer give notice of said
meetings, as required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and
place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the amount assessed
against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is
directed.
. r�
t ' '�. �: .�,a
Adopted by the Council: Date:����d�
Certified Passed by the Council Secretary
By �� �
Mayor
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Greeo Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
l0�>8t0�i v `T r � ! !
DepartmenUofficelwuncil: ' DaM tnitiated: �
Pw -����wo�� ,,.��� ; Green Sheet NO: 3032042
Gontact Person & Phone:
i �� �
i
�. • �.
E-Document Required: y
Docwnent Contact: Sohn Saw
Cantact Phone#: 266-8851
___
y
Assign
Number i
For �
Routing �
OMer
0 pp6tic Works ivan Ortia i
1 �Coune� Marv Ed�san
2 S�[9 Qerk � S6�oore I
i
7otai # of SignaWre Pages _(Clip A II Locat f 8ignature)
i+c
Set
File No.19021
Assessment No. 5064
itlat�ons: Appmte (A} or Reject (ft): Personal Service Contrects Must Mswer the Pollowing Questions:
Planning Commission t. Has this person/fimi eter worked under a contract fur Mis department?
C18 Committee Yes No
Gui Service Commission 2. Has tFas persmJfirtn eur been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Dces tMs persoNfircn possess a skili nM nocmaliy possessed 6y any
cwrent city emOtoyee?
Yes No
Explain ali yes a�swers o� separste sheet and attach to gteen sheet
�
�
Initiating Problem, issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Wh¢re, Why):
RatiScation is necessary in order ta begin collecti�g assessmeats ro help pay for the projec[.
Advantapes ffApproved:
Same as above.
Disadvantaqes ff Appraved:
Properry owners will have assessmenu payabie via property ta�es.
i ' DisadvanU�qesffNotApproved:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with Ciry policy.
hearing to ratify the assessments for improving White Beaz Avenue.
7 ota� Amount of
Trensaction: $79$7'93 CosVRevenue Budgeted: Y
Fundiag Source: ASSeSStTtents & MSA Activiiy Number.
financia� Information:
{Expiain)
(�lI Paqe 1
II