06-792Council File #
Green Sheet # �'Q�
!
Presented by
RESOLUTION
C{TY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
�
1 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Councii File No. 04-968, date October 20, 2004, said resolution
2 being the Ratification of Assessments for the Case/Ruth RSVP, identified as File No. 18997, Assessment
3 No. 5045, and
4
5 WHEREAS, the pioperty located at 1105 Hazel Street North with the property identification number of
6 26-29-22-22-0045 was inadvertently assessed for the improvement, and
7
8 WHEREAS, the property owner has paid a portion of the assessment via the property taxes for 2005 and
9 2006 for a total of $892.26, and
10
11 NOW TFIEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Real Estate Section is authorized to refund the
12 $892.26 to the property owner, and
13
14 BE IT F'LTRTHER RESOLVED, that the amount of $892.26 be funded as follows:
15
16 $453.84 (principal) - 2004 Capital Improvement Bonds — CPL-004-2T'S58-0789-29270
17 $438.42 (interest) - Debt Service Funds — PIR-963-89304-6007-89C�02
18
19 FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Real Estate Section is authorized to request the necessazy changes be
20 made to the property owner's 2006 property taxes.
Benanav
Boshom
Harris
Helgen
Thune
✓
Adopted by Council: Date
Adoption Certified by Council SecrdYary
By:
Approved 1� a}� �: Da[e � C.�b ��
By:
Requested by Department of:
P ublic Works
By:
�
Form Appr ed City Atto e
By:
Form Approv � Mayor for Submission to Council
By:
c3� � S;
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Greert Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet
�� '77oC.i
pw - r„w,�wo�
Contact Person 8
Juan Ortiz �
2&6$8Cvi
Must Be on Council Agenda 6y (Date):
26JUL-06
r:� � v.
�►
Assign
Number
For
Routing
Order
7otai # of Signature Pages _(Clip NI Locations for Signature)
resolution.
itlations: Appro�e (A) or F
Planning Cammission
CIB Committee
CiHI Service Commission
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Green Sheet NO: 3031279
SentTo Person
tv derk C'tv CI rk i
Personal Service Contracts Must Mswerthe Following Questions:
1. Has this persoNfirm eeer wnrked under a contrect for ihis departmeM?
Yes No
2. Has this persoNfirm eeer been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a skiil not nortnally possessetl by any
current city empfoyee?
Yes Fto
Explain all yes answers on separete sheet and aHaeh to green sheet
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Properry owner was assessed for a street that was not improved.
Adva�qgeslfApproved:
Property owner will not have to pay for a sireet that was not impmved.
Disadvantages IfApproved:
None.
AUG 1 1 2Q06
DisadvantageslfNotApproved: tr'r741
Property would continue to be wrongfully assessed.
ToW I Amount of
Trensaction: S92'26 CostlRevenueBUdgeted:
Funding Source; 2QQ¢ C(B/D2bf SefNCPS ActivitY Number:
Financfal Information:
(Explain)
AUG 04 2006
Council Research
AUG 10 2006
July 6, 2006 �2:26 PM Page 1