06-791AMEAIDED 8/23j06
RESOLUTION
OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
��
2 VJHEREAS, the Council of the City of Saint Paul requests the Saint Paul Planning Commission
3 and its staff to examine the City's site plan review and approval ordinance set forth in I.eg. Code
4 § 61.402(c) and prepaze a study, report and recommendation for potential amendment of the site
5 plan review and approval ordinance by including language that would incorporate "Crime
6 Prevention Through Environmental Design" principles anto the City's site plan review process;
7 NOW, THEREFORE,
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council, as set forth below and pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 462357,
Subd.4, hereby refers to the Planning Commission the following suggested amendment to Leg.
Code § 61.402(c) for study and report:
61.402.c Site plan review and approval. In order to approve the site plan, the planning
commission shall consider and find that the site plan is consistent with:
(1) The city's adopted comprehensive plan and development or project plans for sub-areas of the city.
(2) Applicable ordinances of the city.
(3) Preservation of unaque geologic, geographic or historically significant characteristics of the
city and environmentally sensitive areas.
(4) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for such
matters as surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air,
and those aspects of design which may have substantial effects on nei�boring land uses.
(5) The anangement of buildings, uses and facilities of the proposed development in order to
assure abutting property and/or its occupants will not be unreasonably affected.
(6) Czeauon of energy-conserving design through landscaping and location, orientation and
elevation of structures.
(7) Safety and convenience of both vehicular and pedestrian traffic both within the site and in
relation to access streets, including traffic circulation features, the locations and design of
entrances and exits and pazking areas within the site.
(8) The satisfactory availability and capacity of storm and sanitary sewers, including solutions to
any drainage probiems in the area of the development.
(9) Sufficient landscaping, fences, walls and pazking necessary to meet the above objectives.
(10) Site accessibility in accordance with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA), including pazking spaces, passenger loading zones and accessible routes.
(11) Provision for erosion and sediment control as specified in the "Ramsey Erosion and
Sediment Control Handbook.
Council File # D� - 7�'
Green Sheet # 3032155
o�-7ql
2 (121 Provision for the desiQn princi�les of Crime Prevention Throueh Environmental DesiPn as
3 specified in the "Design for Public Safetv - A Guide to Making a Safer Public Realm."
Saint Panl
Requested by Deparhnent of:
Adopted by Council: Date
Adoption Certified by Council SecreCary
BY ` S
Approved by a : D � ��
By:
Br
Fom� Approved by City Attomey
B �L✓!✓�— y- t7- o G
Form Approved by Mayor for Submission [o Council
By:
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
V�O y 7 !�
cA - c�ryan�m�y
CoMact Person & Phone:
Co�ricilmember Flelgen
Z:AUG-O6
Doe,Type: RESOLUSIOPi
i�-aur,a
�
Aasign
bYN�e): Nwn6er
Ftt
Raufing
Order
E-0oeumerrtRequired: Y
DocumentCo�ct MieK�a�s
Co�ct Phone: 2fi6-8776
Green Sheet NO: 3032155
DenaMieM SentTOPerson
0
1
2
3
4
5
Total S of Sign r e Pag ea _(Cl A ll Loeati TorSig
Action Reques6ed:
Requesting tlie Plaming Commission and its staff to examine the City's site plan review a� approva( ordinance and prepare a study,
report and recommmendation foc potenti.al amendmcnt of the site plan review and appcoval ordinance by including language that
would incotporate "Crime Prevention Thmugh Environmental Design" principles into the City's site plan review process.
IOC[IOf15: N�ip�9 �H) Of Ii
Planning Canmission
CIB Committea
Gvl Senice Commission
Personal Service CoMracls
't. Has this p�sorJfirm e�er xqked under a caitrad forthis departmeM?
Yes ND
2 Has this pesoNfirtn e� heen a city employce?
Yes No
3. Dces this personKrtn possess a skill rqt namaily possessed by any
cutterit cfty employee?
Yes No
Explain aN yes a�wers ai separate sheetami attach to graen aheet
MitiaNng Problem, lssues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
AWantages HApproved:
Disadvar�ges IFApproved:
Disadvantagas If NotApproved:
Transacfion:
Funding Source:
Financial information:
{Explai�)
CosURevenue Budgeted:
Actirdy Numtrer:
August 17, 200G 1.25 PM Page 1